Episodes
-
Six months into Israel’s war in Gaza and with no sign of a ceasefire or breakthrough in securing the release of the 130 hostages, as yet unaccounted for, pressure is mounting on Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
There have been widespread protests in Tel Aviv and across Israel. There have been calls both from home and abroad for an early election to be called. And Israel’s greatest ally, the United States has sharpened its rhetoric in the past few weeks over Israel’s conduct of the war, with President Biden now saying that he believes Benjamin Netanyahu is making ‘a mistake’ in his handling of it.
For his part, the Israeli Prime Minister looks set to continue with his military offensive and has shown no indication so far that he is willing to step down or call an early election.
So, on this week’s Inquiry, we’re asking ‘How secure is Benjamin Netanyahu’s leadership?’
Contributors: Professor David Tal, the Yossi Harel Chair in Modern Israel Studies, University of Sussex, UK Natan Sachs, Director of the Centre for Middle East Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC, USA Aaron David Miller, Senior Fellow, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC, USA Professor Tamar Hermann, Senior Research Fellow, The Israel Democracy Institute, Jerusalem
Presenter: Tanya Beckett Producer: Jill Collins Editor: Tara McDermott Technical Producer: Cameron Ward Production Co-ordinator: Liam Morrey
Image credit: Reuters via BBC Images
-
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disease which can lead to loss of mobility and vision. Almost 3 million people worldwide are affected by it. There is no cure, but attempts are being made to accelerate the healing process with treatments to restore what the disease has damaged.
At the same time, scientists have recently discovered a link between MS and a common virus that the majority of us carry in our bodies. It had been known for years that there was a link between Multiple Sclerosis and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). But then, a study finally proved the link.
Now, trials are underway on potential vaccines against EBV and scientists are hopeful that this could be a gateway to preventing MS.
This week on the Inquiry we are asking: Are we close to a breakthrough for Multiple Sclerosis?
Contributors:
Tim Coetzee, Chief Advocacy, Services & Science Officer for the National MS Society, USTjalf Ziemssen, Professor of Clinical Neuroscience and Head of the Multiple Sclerosis Center and Neuroimmunological Laboratory, University Clinic Carl-Gustav Carus, GermanyJeffrey Huang, Associate Professor of Biology, Georgetown University, USClaire Shannon-Lowe, Associate Professor in Virology, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy at the University of Birmingham, UK
Production team:
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Matt ToulsonResearcher: Ajai SinghEditor: Tara McDermottStudio Manager: Hal HainesProduction Co-ordinator: Liam Morrey
Image Credit: Shidlovski\Getty
-
Missing episodes?
-
For centuries chocolate has had a global appeal, the key ingredient of this confectionery is derived from the dried and fully fermented seed of the Theobroma cacao, whose origins began in northern Amazonia. From this tree, both cocoa solids and cocoa butter can be extracted to form the basis of chocolate.
Today, it’s the West African countries of Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana that produce the bulk of the world’s supply of cocoa beans. But in recent years hotter temperatures and shifts in rainfall patterns have impacted cocoa harvests particularly in this region. And now the global price of this key ingredient has roughly doubled since the start of last year, fuelling concern that demand could outweigh supply. Cocoa farming itself is mainly small scale and these farmers are at the bottom end of the value chain when it comes to profits. But whilst many of the major chocolate manufacturers do invest in the industry, with support for improved planting and harvesting techniques, farming sustainably is just one of a number of challenges that these small farmers face.
So on this week’s Inquiry, we’re asking ‘Is climate change impacting chocolate production?’
Contributors: Dr Katie Sampeck, British Academy Global Professor of Historical Archaeology, University of Reading, EnglandPhilip Antwi-Agyei, Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana Steffany Bermúdez, Policy Advisor, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), CanadaYunusa Abubakar, Project Manager, International Cocoa Organisation (ICCO), Côte d’Ivoire
Presenter: Charmaine CozierProducer: Jill Collins Researcher: Matt ToulsonEditor: Tara McDermott Technical Producer: Hal HainesProduction Co-ordinator: Liam Morrey
Image by grafvision via Getty Images
-
In February this year, El Salvador's president Nayib Bukele won re-election with nearly 85% of the vote. His flagship policy after he came to power in 2019 has been the mass arrest of thousands of alleged gang members, mainly young men.
It is estimated that over 100,000 people are now behind bars as part of his crime crackdown. The round-ups have been hugely popular with El Salvador's people as it has improved security and neighbouring countries are taking note.
But critics say following Bukele's approach could threaten democracy, not just in El Salvador but across the continent. So on this week’s Inquiry, we’re asking: Will neighbouring countries follow El Salvador's lead on crime?
Contributors: Carlos Dada, director of El Faro, an online newspaper based in El SalvadorKatherine Saunders-Hastings, a lecturer in Latin American Studies at the University of London's Institute of the Americas.Will Freeman, Fellow for Latin American Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, New York.Monica Pachon , a political scientist and professor at the University of the Andes in Bogotá, Colombia.
Presenter: David BakerProducer: Farhana HaiderJournalism Researcher: Matt Toulson Editor: Tara McDermott Technical Producer: Nicky EdwardsProduction Co-ordinator: Tim Fernley and Liam Morrey
Image Credit:Alex Peña / Stringer via Getty Images
-
More than half of the world’s population currently lives in cities, and by 2050, the UN estimates that figure will rise to nearly 7 in 10 people. The world is also getting hotter, with heatwaves and wildfires becoming increasingly common.
So how can we deal with the dual challenges of increasing urbanisation and extreme weather caused by climate change? Perhaps we should look downwards.
For millennia, humans have taken refuge underground from the elements, predators and from war. Even today, bomb shelters exist under major cities like Beijing and Seoul. Many cities across the world have subway systems for easy transportation – and some are integrated seamlessly with below-ground business and shopping centres.
But what are the future challenges for urban planners and architects in this subterranean space, and how can we overcome the social stigma against those who live underground?
This week on the Inquiry, we ask: is our future underground?
Contributors: Martin Dixon, trustee of Subterranea Britannica, a society devoted to the study and investigation of man-made and man-used underground places. Jacques Besner, architect and urban planner; co-founder and general manager of Associated Research Centres for Urban Underground Spaces.Antonia Cornaro co-chair of ITACUS, the International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association's Committee on Underground Space.Professor Clara Irazábal, Director of the Urban Studies and Planning Program at the University of Maryland, USA.
Presenter: Tanya Beckett Producer: Ravi NaikEditor: Tara McDermottResearcher: Matt Toulson Production Coordinators : Janet Staples & Liam Morrey
Photo by BEHROUZ MEHRI via Getty Images
-
The Mexican government has won its appeal to bring a civil lawsuit against a number of American gun companies. Mexico, which has extremely restrictive gun laws, claims that the ‘deliberate’ business practices of these US firms results in the illegal flow of firearms into Mexico, contributing to the gun crime violence in the country. They are now seeking as much as ten billion dollars in compensation.
The gun companies, which include some of America’s oldest established names in the firearms business, deny any wrongdoing. Since 2005, these companies have being granted immunity from prosecution under the ‘Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act’. This law protects the firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. But Mexico’s argument is that PLCAA, as it’s also known, only applies within the United States and therefore doesn’t protect the companies from liability.
It’s a case which is also resonating with other Latin American countries who have been impacted by illegal gun trafficking from the United States. Some of these countries have supported Mexico’s claims in the courts. And they will be watching closely to see if Mexico’s lawsuit, the first by a sovereign state, can set a precedent.
So on this week’s Inquiry, we’re asking ‘Can Mexico win its battle with US gun companies?’
Contributors:Ioan Grillo, journalist and author focusing on Organised Crime, MexicoAdam Winkler, Cornell Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law, California, USARobert Spitzer, Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of Political Science, SUNY Cortland; Adjunct Faculty Member, College of William and Mary School of Law, USADr. León Castellanos-Jankiewicz, Senior Researcher, Asser Institute for International and European Law; Academic Supervisor, International Law Clinic on Access to Justice for Gun Violence, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Presenter: Charmaine CozierProducer: Jill CollinsJournalism Researcher: Matt ToulsonEditor: Tara McDermottTechnical Producer: Cameron WardProduction Co-ordinator: Liam Morrey Image: Reuters via BBC Images
-
One of the most famous of Egypt’s pyramids, Menkaure’s pyramid on the Giza plateau, is the subject of controversy after the Egyptian authorities announced plans to restore it in what the country’s Head of Antiquities has called “the project of the century” and Egypt’s “gift to the world”. But not everyone believes such a restoration is in keeping with the demands of proper archaeological preservation.
The plans met with opposition from archaeologists and Egyptologists both inside and outside the country. The project has now been paused after recommendations from a scientific committee commissioned by the Egyptian authorities.
So what’s going on with the pyramids?
Presenter: Gary O’DonoghueProducer: Louise ClarkeResearcher: Matt ToulsonEditor: Tara McDermottTechnical producer: Nicky EdwardsProduction co-ordinator: Liam Morrey
Contributors: Aidan Dodson, honorary Professor of Egyptology at Bristol university in the UKDr Jennifer Hellum, senior lecturer in classics and ancient history at the University of Auckland in New ZealandHeba Saleh, Cairo correspondent for the Financial TimesSalima Ikram, professor of Egyptology at the American University in Cairo
Photo by KHALED ELFIQI/EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock via BBC Images
-
Across the world fertility rates are falling and for the first time Europe is experiencing a sustained population decline. The average fertility rate for the European Union is 1.53 live births per woman. In Italy the fertility rate has remained low for the last thirty years, with an average 1.3 births per woman.
Some governments, who are concerned that not enough people are being born to keep their economies functioning in the long term are spending billions on incentives and policies to try and reverse the trend. But even in the Nordic countries, which are noted for some of the best family focused policies, these are proving ineffective against a markedly high drop in fertility rates over the last decade.
Society’s attitudes on when or whether to start a family are shifting, so does this mean that we need to change the way we approach the issue or even adapt to a future with fewer people?
On this week’s Inquiry, we’re asking ‘Can Europe reverse its falling fertility rates?’
Contributors: Anna Rotkirch, Research Director, Population Research Institute, The Family Federation of Finland, Helsinki Michael Herrmann, Senior Advisor on Economics and Demography, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), TurkeyArnstein Aassve, Professor of Demography, Political Science Centre, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy Tomas Sobotka, Deputy Director, Vienna Institute of Demography, Austrian Academy of Sciences
Presenter: Charmaine Cozier Producer: Jill Collins Journalism Researcher: Matt ToulsonEditor: Tara McDermott Technical Producers: Nicky Edwards and Toby JamesProduction Co-ordinator: Liam Morrey
Image Credit: PA via BBC Images
-
In the next two or three years America’s National Aeronautics and Space Administration - NASA - plans to send a mission into space that will land people on the moon for the first time in over a half a century.
The mission has already been pushed back and is widely expected to be delayed again.
But America is not alone. Both China and India also have ambitions to land people on the lunar surface.
Who is next to walk on the moon is driven by geopolitics and a desire to harness the moon’s resources. Different countries, and even the private companies involved, all have different agendas. Who gets there first may even determine the political ideology of any future permanent human settlement.
Contributors:Oliver Morton, Senior Editor at The Economist and author of The Moon, A History for the FutureEric Berger, Senior Space Editor at Ars TechnicaChristopher Newman, Professor of space law and policy at Northumbria UniversityNamrata Goswami, Professor at the Thunderbird School of Global Management at Arizona State University
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Louise ClarkeJournalism Researcher: Matt Toulson Editor: Tara McDermottTechnical Producer: Richard HannafordProduction Coordinator: Liam Morrey
Image: U.S. Flag On The Moon by Encyclopaedia Britannica via Getty ImagesCredit: NASA Youtube Channel
-
The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church - once a powerful marker of nationhood - is deeply split as result of the recent civil war in Tigray which exacerbated historical tensions in the church.
The Church, which traces its history to the fourth century, was once the biggest denomination in Ethiopia with nearly 44 percent of the population calling themselves Orthodox Christians, but now its centrality in Ethiopian spiritual and political life - once unquestioned - appears to hang in the balance, with a steady increase in the number of people joining other denominations and the number of people calling themselves Orthodox Christians diminishing. Ethiopia is a modern state, with the second largest population in Africa, led by Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for 2019. But months after he took power, Ethiopia was ripped apart by a civil war which broke out in November 2020 and left tens of thousands of civilians dead. In May 2021, four archbishops in Tigray announced that they were forming an independent structure. They accused the church of not opposing the war - and of being too close to Abiy Ahmed's government. Although a ceasefire was agreed in 2022, the recent splits highlight historic ethnic and religious tensions in Ethiopia.
Contributors:
Ralph Lee: Oxford Centre for Mission Studies in the UK.Mebratu Kelecha: London School of Economics. His research focuses on conflict, peace building and democracy.Yohannes Woldemariam: US-based academic specialising in the Horn of Africa and the Middle East.Jorge Haustein: Associate Professor of World Christianity at the University of Cambridge.
CREDITSPresenter: Audrey BrownProducer: Philip Reevell. Researcher: Matt ToulsonTechnical Producer: Nicky Edwards. Production Coordinator: Tim FernleyEditor: Tara McDermott
Main Image: Ethiopian Orthodox priests walk around the church during the Saint Michael's anniversary celebration at St. Michael church in Mekele, the capital of Tigray region, Ethiopia
Image Credit: Yasuyoshi Chiba\AFP via Getty
-
After serving nearly a year of his 26 year sentence for treason in a Nicaraguan jail, Bishop Rolando Álvarez of Matagalpa was flown to Rome in January. The high profile bishop known as an outspoken critic of President Ortega’s Sandinista government has been under house arrest since August 2022. He was allowed to leave the country alongside his supporter Bishop Isidoro Mora and a group of priests and seminarians, after a request from the Vatican. It’s the latest development in a relationship between Nicaragua and the Holy See that has grown increasingly tense. President Ortega has had a complicated relationship with Nicaragua’s Catholic clergy ever since he first came to power in the 1979 revolution. It was with the help of the Church that Daniel Ortega returned to power in 2006, but as his rule became increasingly more authoritarian he steadily repressed any sort of opposition, including critical voices from within the clergy. Mass peaceful protests over social security reforms in 2018 ramped up the repression from the Ortega government in the following years. Opposition leaders, journalists, and prominent leaders from within the R.C.Church were amongst those expelled or advised to leave the country and some like Bishop Álvarez were even imprisoned. The situation has left the Catholic Church in a difficult position. There are no diplomatic ties now between Nicaragua and the Holy See and since the end of the Cold War it appears that the international community has found more pressing concerns. Nicaragua’s Catholic neighbours may have the country on their radars, but how willing they are in supporting the Pope over his concerns for Nicaragua’s Catholic population remains to be seen.
So, this week on The Inquiry we’re asking ‘Can the Vatican stop Nicaragua’s Catholic crackdown?
Contributors: Brandon Van Dyck, Associate Director of the Princeton Initiative in Catholic Thought, The Aquinas Institute, New Jersey, USABianca Jagger, President of the Bianca Jagger Human Rights Foundation, Executive Directors Leadership Council of Amnesty International, LondonAndrea Gagliarducci, Vatican Analyst, EWTN /ACI Group, Rome, Italy Ryan Berg, Director, Americas Programme, Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Washington DC, USA
Presenter: Tanya Beckett Producer: Jill Collins Researcher: Matt ToulsonEditor: Tara McDermott Technical Producer: Cameron Ward Broadcast Co-ordinator: Tim Fernley
Image Credit: Mireya Acierto\Getty
-
After months of tension and hostility in the Middle East over the Gaza-Israel conflict, Iran has publicly stated its desire to avoid a regional conflict. It has however displayed its military force on several fronts.
There have been missile strikes. Iran targeted militant bases in western Pakistan leading to a retaliatory back-and-forth with Pakistan. With attacks on Iraq and Syria, Tehran said it was targeting Islamic State and Israel's Mossad spy agency - both of whom it claimed were behind the deadliest domestic attack on Iranian soil since the Islamic revolution – an attack in early January that killed almost a hundred people in the southern city of Kerman.
Iran has been using proxy groups too - the so-called “Axis of Resistance” – to carry out attacks on Israel and its allies to show solidarity with the Palestinians. The axis is a grouping of Iran-backed militant groups including Houthi militants in Yemen who have been responsible for disrupting shipping in the Red Sea and have been targeted by US and UK air strikes aimed at deterring them. Other members of the axis include Hezbollah in Lebanon and various groups in Syria and Iraq. Tehran insists that the groups act independently but that the coalition shares its goals. Iran’s stated aim is to roll back US influence in the Middle East and it stands ideologically opposed to Israel. Iran’s grown closer to China and Russia too, the latter more so since the start of the Ukraine war in 2022. What does Iran hope to gain from these relationships?
We also ask how Iran wants the current Israel-Gaza conflict to end.
So this week on The Inquiry we’re asking ‘What does Iran want?’
Experts: Negar Mortazavi, Iranian journalist and Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy.Kirsten Fontenrose is a non-resident fellow at the Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative in the Atlantic Council’s Middle East Programs. Professor Maryam Alemzadeh, Associate Professor in History and Politics of Iran at the Oxford School of Global and Area Studies (OSGA) and a Middle East Centre Fellow.Suzanne Maloney is the vice president and director of the Foreign Policy program at the Brookings Institution, where her research focuses on Iran and Persian Gulf energy.
CREDITS:Presenter: Charmaine CozierProducer: Philip ReevellResearcher: Matt ToulsonProduction Coordinator: Tim FernleyEditor: Tara McDermottTechnical Producer: Nicky Edwards
Image: Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamanei
Image Credit: Anadolu/Getty
-
Indonesia’s ambitious plan to move the administrative headquarters of its capital city from Jakarta to a new location on the island of Borneo, in the East Kalimantan province, is nearing the completion of its first phase. Known as Nusantara, the new city’s inauguration is scheduled to coincide with Indonesia’s Independence Day on 17th August, the date of the final term of office for the current President Joko Widodo.
The project has been deemed necessary as Jakarta is considered no longer fit for purpose. Located on the island of Java, it ranks as one of the most densely populated cities in the world and it is reported to be sinking by around 17 centimetres a year in some areas, due to a combination of environmental pollution and climate change.
With four more phases to go, around two million people are expected to inhabit Nusantara by the planned completion date of 2045, but that remains dependent on a number of factors and the schedule has already hit some challenges.
Future development is reliant on billions of dollars from foreign investors and currently the Government is struggling to secure much commitment. Furthermore, with Presidential elections due next month, there are concerns about whether a new leader will be inclined to continue with the vision announced by the outgoing President Joko Widodo.
So this week on The Inquiry, we’re asking ‘Can Indonesia pull off relocating its capital?’
Contributors: Dr Athiqah Nur Alami, Head of Research Centre for Politics, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia. Dimas Wisnu Adrianto, Assistant Professor, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Brawijaya University, Indonesia Sulfikar Amir, Associate Professor of Science, Technology and Society, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang University, Singapore Julia Lau, Senior Fellow and Co Coordinator, Indonesia Studies Programme, ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore
Presenter: Charmaine CozierProducers: Matt Toulson and Jill Collins Editor: Tara McDermottTechnical Producer: Nicky Edwards and Toby James Production Co-ordinator: Tim Fernley
Image credit: Dimas Ardian/Bloomberg/Getty.
-
In 1973 America ended a draft that had been in effect since before it entered the second World War, and for the last fifty years the US Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines have been an all-volunteer military.
But, recently, of the four major branches which make up the US armed services, only the Marines have achieved their target for new recruits. And the biggest force, the Army, has been struggling most of all. In the past two years its missed its recruiting target by several thousand.
In this edition of the Inquiry, Sandra Kanthal looks at the myriad reasons the American Army is failing to enlist enough new soldiers, and why this may affect what impact it can have on global security.
Guests:Nora Bensahel – Professor of the Practice at the School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Mark Cancian - Senior Advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies Peter Feaver – Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, Duke University and author of Thanks For Your Service: The Causes and Consequences of Public Confidence in the US Military Beth Asch – Senior Economist, The Rand Corporation
Production Team:Presenter: Sandra KanthalProducer: Sandra KanthalEditor: Tara McDermottTechnical Producer: James BeardProduction Co-ordinator: Tim Fernley
Image Credit: Bo Zaunders\Getty
-
Something strange started happening in early 2023 in the waters off south-western Europe, where the Mediterranean sea meets the Atlantic ocean. Orcas began slamming into the sides of fishing and sailing vessels. The killer whales then dived underneath to locate and destroy the rudders used to steer the boats. Once finished, the orcas departed, leaving shocked crews and thousands of dollars of damage behind. Some of the attacks were over in a matter of minutes, but others lasted hours.
It’s very unusual behaviour for this particular mammal, but orcas are under a lot of threat from man-made hazards. Factors like underwater noise pollution, overfishing, toxic waste and climate change to name a few are making orca life extremely difficult. Could all of this have caused this change in behaviour?
Contributors:
Billy Heaney, zoologist, wildlife tour guide and presenterDr Jeremy Kiszka, professor of biology at Florida International University in MiamiHannah Strager, marine biologist and director of exhibitions at the Whale Museum in NorwayNicola Hodgins, researcher with the global charity Whale and Dolphin Conservation
Presenter: Charmaine Cozier Producers: Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty, Jill Collins, Matt ToulsonEditors: Tara McDermott and Tom BigwoodResearcher: Matt ToulsonSound designer: Nicky Edwards Production co-ordinator: Jordan King
Image: An orca showing its teeth (Credit: Marcos del Mazo/LightRocket via Getty Images)
-
Sargassum seaweed was recorded as far back as the 15th century when Christopher Columbus wrote in his expedition diaries about miles and miles and miles of dense seaweed as he crossed the Atlantic Ocean. In 2011, a great mass of this seaweed emerged, stretching from West Africa to the Gulf of Mexico, a phenomenon known as the Great Atlantic Sargassum Belt. Since then it’s been washing up on coastlines in massive amounts, causing a big impact on communities whose economy relies heavily on the tourism industry. As the seaweed decays it releases hydrogen sulphide which has a strong odour of rotten eggs.
Various research projects are looking into ways of containing this seaweed, as no one has found a viable solution on an industrial scale. But whilst it is causing problems onshore, offshore in the deep ocean of the Sargasso Sea, the sargassum provides a unique ecosystem for a variety of marine life including turtles and swordfish.
So, this week on The Inquiry we’re asking, ‘What’s going on with sargassum seaweed?’
Contributors:
Dr. Chuanmin Hu, Professor of Oceanography, University of South Florida College of Marine Science, USA
Dr. David Freestone, Executive Secretary, The Sargasso Sea Commission, Washington DC, USA
Dr. Marie-Louise Felix, Marine Biologist and Lecturer, Sir Arthur Lewis Community College, Consultant to the Department of Fisheries, St Lucia
Ajit Subramaniam, Biological Oceanographer, Lamont Research Professor, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, New York, USA
Presenter: Charmaine CozierProducer: Jill CollinsResearcher: George Crafer Editor: Tara McDermott Technical Producer: Nicky Edwards Production Co-ordinator: Jordan King
Image: Miami Beach, Florida, North Beach Atlantic Ocean shoreline, large quantity of arriving seaweed sargassum macroalgae, tourist trying to swim. (Photo by: Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
-
Toyota has unveiled a revolutionary electric car battery, able to travel 1,200 kilometres in one go and can be charged in just ten minutes.
Toyota’s CEO Koji Sato said that “commercialisation of solid state batteries is a thing of the future... now within reach, changing the future of cars". The company also claims to be on the brink of being able to manufacture them.
So is this, as some are claiming, a ‘watershed moment’ in car making? Can these new batteries now be produced at scale? What impact will this have on the popularity of electric cars and their uptake?
Has Toyota solved the electric car battery problem?
Contributors:
Paul Shearing, chair in sustainable energy engineering and director of the Zero Institute at the University of Oxford.Shirley Meng, Professor of Molecular Engineering at the University of Chicago.Jeff Liker, Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Michigan for 35 years.Dr Evi Petavratzi, a mineral commodity specialist from the British Geological Survey. Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Bob HowardEditor: Tara McDermottSound Designer: Gareth JonesProduction Coordinator: Jordan King
Image: Olga Rolenko via Getty Images - 1403000871
-
Tensions between South American neighbours Venezuela and Guyana have ratcheted up a notch in recent weeks over the disputed oil rich region of Essequibo. The territory, which is roughly the size of Florida, currently makes up around two thirds of Guyana and vast oil reserves were discovered here in 2015 which have helped make Guyana’s economy one of the fastest growing in the world. Essequibo has come under the authority of Guyana and before it British Guiana for more than a century, but Venezuela has always disputed that decision made by an international tribunal back in 1899. The issue is currently with the International Court of Justice in the Hague, who are expected to make a decision next year. But Venezuela does not recognise their jurisdiction. And now President Maduro has used the results of a recent referendum claiming rights over Essequibo, as evidence to support his threat to move forward with plans to annexe the region.
So this week on The Inquiry, we’re asking ‘Is Venezuela about to invade its neighbour?’
Contributors: Phil Gunson, Senior Analyst, Andes, Caracas, Venezuela for International Crisis Group Alejandro Velasco, Associate Professor of Latin American History, New York University, author of ‘Barrio Rising: Urban Popular Politics and the Making of Modern VenezuelaDr Christopher Sabatini, Senior Fellow for Latin America at Chatham House, London Dr Annette Idler, Associate Professor in Global Security, Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford.
Presenter: David BakerProducer: Jill CollinsResearcher: George CraferEditor: Tara McDermottTechnical Producer: Mitch GoodallBroadcast Co-ordinator: Jordan King
Image credit: Anadolu\Getty
-
In less than a year, France will play host to the Olympic and Paralympic Games. The opening ceremony will be played out along the River Seine in the nation’s capital city Paris. The Seine is also set to be the scene of the open-water swimming events and work is now being done to make sure the polluted waterway will be clean and safe enough for the Olympic participants.
To accommodate the expected influx of visitors to the Games, new transport links are been built. Whilst its already been acknowledged that some of the network is planned to link up a number of Olympic sites, it won’t be ready in time for the Games. There are plans to provide extra river boats and cycle lanes.
In addition to all this is the question of whether the French themselves are in the mood to celebrate the Games. This summer saw waves of social and political unrest in the country, but traditional sporting events like the Rugby World Cup have played a role in bringing the country together.
This week on The Inquiry, we’re asking ‘Is Paris Ready for the 2024 Olympics?’
Contributors: Jean-Marie Mouchel, Professor of Hydrology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France Florence Villeminot, Journalist and Presenter, France 24, Paris, FranceBill Hanway, Global Sports Leader, AECOM, Dallas, Texas, USARainbow Murray, Professor of Politics, Queen Mary University of London
Presenter: Tanya BeckettProducer: Jill CollinsResearcher: Matt Toulson Technical Producer: Kelly Young Production Co-ordinator: Jordan KingEditor Tara McDermott
Photo: Olympic Rings to celebrate the IOC official announcement that Paris won the 2024 Olympic bid are seen in front of the Eiffel Tower at the Trocadero square in Paris, France, September 16, 2017. Credit: Reuters
-
Around 1 billion people around the world suffer from a mysterious neurological condition called migraine. Far more than just a headache, migraine is abnormal processing of the world around us that can have symptoms like loss of sight and speech, dizziness, nausea and extreme fatigue.
There are drugs which can help those struggling with the condition like anti-depressants and anti-convulsants. However, they weren’t developed specifically for migraine and can come with quite a lot of side effects or simply not work.
For a long time migraine medication has been a process of trial and error.
But a new class of drugs called anti-CGRPs are being hailed as a breakthrough migraine medication. Anti-CGRPs have a small side effect profile and were designed specifically to target migraine. They work by blocking CGRP (Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide) from building up in the body and triggering a receptor in the brain which turns on a head pain pathway causing the migraine attack.
Earlier this year the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence - or NICE – in England cleared the use of an anti-CGRP called Rimegepant to use as both a preventive and acute treatment. Clinicians are hoping this will massively improve the lives of those living with the condition.
So this week on The Inquiry were asking ‘Have we reached a turning point with migraine medication?’
Contributors: Dr. Amaal Starling, neurologist and headache specialist at Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, in the US state of Arizona. Dr Faraidoon, researcher at the Georgian Institute for Global Health at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.Peter Goadsby , Director of the NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility and a professor of neurology at King's College London, England. Dr Lise Rystad Oie, researcher at the government funded Norwegian Centre for Headache Research - also known as NorHead.
Presenter: Charmaine Cozier Producer: Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty Editor: Tara McDermott Researcher: Matt ToulsonTechnical Producer: Craig BoardmanBroadcast Co-ordinator: Jordan King
Image: eternalcreative - Getty Images: 1372323487
- Show more
