Episoder

  • AI-generated ‘deepfake’ audio clips of both London mayor Sadiq Khan and leader of the opposition Sir Keir Starmer have circulated on social media. A faked robocall impersonating Joe Biden was sent to voters before a primary election. The number of AI-enhanced images of politicians is increasing.
    In a year when over two billion people in more than 50 countries will vote in elections, the use of AI technology – more widely accessible than ever – and disinformation could have a major impact on trust and integrity.
    So what can be done to tackle this growing problem? What can political parties, government, media companies and civil society do to mitigate the risks of AI and ensure electoral integrity? And what steps can be taken ahead the elections of 2024 and then in the longer term.
    We were joined by an expert panel, including:
    • Professor Joe Burton, Professor of International Security in the Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion at Lancaster University
    • Louise Edwards, Director of Regulation and Digital Transformation at the Electoral Commission
    • Chris Morris, Chief Executive of Full Fact
    • Simon Staffell, Director of Government Affairs at Microsoft
    The event was chaired by Jill Rutter, Senior Fellow at the Institute for Government.

    We would like to thank Lancaster University for kindly supporting this event.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • The question of how to reform the House of Lords dominates discussions about the upper house, with less attention focused on its day-to-day activities. Since his election as Lord Speaker in 2021, Lord McFall of Alcluith has sought to champion its important role of revising legislation and advising the government, while ensuring the Lords remains on the path of modernisation.
    Lord McFall has focused on parliamentary outreach and prioritised communicating the value of the House of Lords externally, bringing the devolved parliaments and Westminster closer. He has also worked with schools and universities, and launched a podcast, to demystify the upper house. 
    What are public perceptions of the upper chamber and how have they changed? How has the Lords changed its ways of working? What kinds of links does it have with the devolved parliaments? And what might all of this mean for discussions about reform of the Lords?
    Lord McFall addressed these questions and more in a keynote speech at the Institute for Government, before taking part in a discussion with the IfG’s Director Dr Hannah White and an audience Q&A.
    Follow us on X (formerly known as Twitter) @IfGEvents and join the conversation using #lordspeaker.
    Lord McFall of Alcluith became Lord Speaker in 2021, having served as senior deputy speaker for five years. He entered the Lords in 2010 after spending 23 years in the Commons as Labour MP for Dumbarton and later West Dumbartonshire. There, he served as a minister in the Northern Ireland Office, a government whip, and chaired the Treasury Select Committee between 2001 and 2010, including during the global financial crisis. Before entering politics, Lord McFall worked for over a decade as a teacher.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Mangler du episoder?

    Klikk her for å oppdatere manuelt.

  • The Treasury is perhaps the most powerful department in Whitehall. Its ownership of public spending means it has direct control over the money available to the rest of government, while the Treasury’s responsibility for tax policy gives it enormous influence over the finances of households and businesses.
    But criticism of the department’s influence on government policy is almost as old as the institution itself, with frequent complaints about the “dead hand of the Treasury” or attacks on the department’s “orthodoxy”.
    However, a recent IfG report found many of the fiercest criticisms to be overblown: many simply represent a dislike of a budget constraint. The department plays an important function in effectively managing public spending and guarding against financial disorder. It has also consistently been a champion of economic growth, though there is debate about how that is managed against its responsibility for managing government spending. While the department has clear strengths, there are clearly problems with how it functions. The Treasury often takes a short-term approach, is frequently accused of micromanaging other departments, and wields excessive influence over government policy relative to the rest of the centre.
    So how can these problems be addressed? How much are they due to the relative weakness of other departments or the incentives facing Treasury ministers? And just what impact does the Treasury have on government policy making?
    Our expert panel exploring these issues and more featured:
    • James Bowler CB, Permanent Secretary of HM Treasury
    • Anita Charlesworth, Director of Research at the Health Foundation and former Director of Public Spending at HM Treasury
    • David Gauke, former Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
    • Giles Wilkes, Senior Fellow at the Institute for Government and co-author of Treasury orthodoxy, and former No 10 special adviser for industrial strategy
    The event was chaired by Dr Gemma Tetlow, Chief Economist at the Institute for Government
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Fraud is the UK’s most common crime. But despite 3.5 million incidents reported in 2022/23, 40% of all reported crimes, only one in a thousand results in a charge or summons. So why is there such a huge gap between preventing, detecting and prosecuting this crime – and what can be done to fix the problem?
    A wide range of organisations have responsibility for tackling fraud, including the Home Office, National Crime Agency, Serious Fraud Office, City of London Police, Metropolitan Police Service, Financial Conduct Authority and the National Cyber Security Centre. However, there are problems with coordination, capacity and capability.
    So what can government and others do to help prevent fraud? How can coordination among the various agencies responsible for tackling fraud be improved? And what steps could be taken to help increase detection and prosecution rates?
    We were joined by an expert panel, including:
    • Francesca Carlesi, CEO of Revolut UK
    • Adrian Searle, Director of the National Economic Crime Centre
    • Nick Stapleton, Co-Presenter of BBC Scam Interceptors
    • Rt Hon Emily Thornberry MP, Shadow Attorney General
    The event was chaired by Nick Davies, Programme Director at the Institute for Government
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • From tackling low economic growth to addressing regional inequalities, from adapting to climate change to transforming public service performance, UK government is facing substantial and urgent challenges. But without radical reform of the centre of government, whoever wins the next election will repeat the failures of previous administrations. The next prime minister must transform No.10, the Cabinet Office and the Treasury.
    On Monday 11 March, The Rt Hon Sir John Major KG CH and The Rt Hon Gordon Brown spoke at the Institute for Government to launch the final report of the Commission on the Centre of Government. It sets out a plan – ambitious but deliverable – for reforming the centre of government.
    Over the last year the IfG’s Centre Commission has been speaking to people who have worked at the heart of government in the UK and overseas, to devolved governments, industry and civil society leaders and community leaders. Our conclusion is that the centre of government is not equipped to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Fundamental change is needed – and it cannot wait.
    The first part of the event featured opening speeches from Sir John Major and Gordon Brown. This was followed by panel discussion of the core recommendations of the report. For this discussion we were delighted to be joined by:
    • Baroness (Louise) Casey, a Commissioner who supported the project, and a crossbench peer and former civil servant
    • Lord (Gus) O'Donnell, former Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service
    • Sir Anthony Seldon, Deputy Chair of the Commission on the Centre of Government.
    The panel was chaired by Dr Hannah White, Director of the Institute for Government and Chair of the Commission on the Centre of Government. This event was supported by a grant from Charities Aid Foundation.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • With the general election less than a year away, the Conservatives, Labour and all other political parties are drawing up their manifestos. Scrutinised by the media and voters, manifestos can shape debate, shift the polls, and play a major part in an election campaign – and shape what the winning part does in government.
    While manifestos are described as a contract between a party and the people, the reality in government is often quite different. Pledges may prove difficult to deliver in practice, with unforeseen crises and the day-to-day challenges of governing seeing commitments fall by the wayside. In a coalition or minority government, parties may have to compromise.
    So how do the parties develop and write their manifestos? What does a good manifesto actually look like? What are the questions that Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer will be considering when signing off on their manifestos? And just how important are manifestos during – and after – a general election campaign?
    Joining us to discuss these questions and more were: 
    • Andrew Fisher, former Executive Director of Policy for the Labour Party, and author of the 2017 and 2019 Labour manifestos 
    • Robert Shrimsley, Chief UK Political Commentator and Executive Editor at the Financial Times
    • Rachel Wolf, Founding Partner at Public First, and co-author of the 2019 Conservative manifesto
    The event was chaired by Dr Catherine Haddon, Programme Director at the Institute for Government.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Dr Thérèse Coffey served in government under every prime minister from David Cameron to Rishi Sunak, including four years as a member of the cabinet. She led the Department for Work and Pensions through the Covid pandemic, served as deputy prime minister and heath secretary under Liz Truss, and was made environment secretary by Rishi Sunak. She left government at the November 2023 reshuffle. 
    Dr Coffey joined Tim Durrant, Programme Director for Ministers at the Institute for Government, to reflect on her government career and the challenges of ministerial life. What was it like serving under five different prime ministers? How did she approach running a large delivery-focused department during the pandemic? And are the pressures of ministerial office impacting too much on the lives of politicians?
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Devolution to Wales is almost 25 years old. Since the first Welsh assembly elections in 1999, the powers of the devolved institutions in Cardiff have been substantially expanded – with Welsh voters backing the historic transformation of the assembly into a law-making parliament in a 2011 referendum. 
    A quarter of a century since devolution began, what are the potential next steps in Wales’s unfinished constitutional journey? Set up to address this very question, the cross-party Independent Commission on the Constitutional Future of Wales, established by the Welsh government, will publish its final report in January 2024 – a key moment in the debate on the future of Wales.
    The Institute for Government was delighted to welcome Rt Hon Mark Drakeford MS, the First Minister of Wales, to discuss the findings of the commission, his perspective on how devolution to Wales could be protected and strengthened, and how a future Labour government in Westminster should reform the constitution and improve relations with the devolved administrations.
    Mark Drakeford was in conversation with Dr Hannah White, Director of the Institute for Government, followed by Q&A with the live and online audience. 
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • A wide-ranging discussion on the key issues facing government – and the economy – as a general election draws near. On the panel:
    • Claire Ainsley, Director of the Project on Center-Left Renewal and former Executive Director of Policy to Keir Starmer
    • Anita Boateng, Partner at Portland Communications and former Special Adviser for the Cabinet Office, MoJ and DWP
    • Sam Freedman, Senior Fellow at the Institute for Government
    • Giles Wilkes, Senior Fellow at the Institute for Government
    • Joe Owen, Director of Impact at the Institute for Government (Chair)
    This event was part of the Institute for Government’s Government 2024 annual conference.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Stuart Hoddinott, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government, set out key findings from Performance Tracker – the IfG’s annual stocktake of nine key public services – ahead of a panel discussion on how public service performance can be turned around. On the panel:


    Stephen Bush, Associate Editor and Columnist at the Financial Times


    Councillor Georgia Gould, Leader of Camden Council


    Rt Hon Kwasi Kwarteng MP, former Chancellor of the Exchequer


    Nick Davies, Programme Director at the Institute for Government (Chair)

    This event was part of the Institute for Government’s Government 2024 annual conference.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • The IfG was delighted to welcome Rt Hon John Glen MP, Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office, for a keynote speech at Government 2024, the IfG’s annual conference with Grant Thornton UK LLP. This was followed by an in conversation with Dr Hannah White OBE, Director of the IfG.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • The next general election is – at most – one year away. If Labour wins, there will, as is almost always the case in the UK, be an overnight transition of power. A party that has spent 14 years in opposition would be instantly thrown into government.
     
    But having focused already limited resources on election campaigning, and often lacking the knowledge and experience of being in government, how can opposition parties prepare for an overnight transition? Which issues do they need to consider ahead of a possible election win? And what challenges might arise on that first day in power?
     
    As the Institute’s research shows, proper preparation can make the difference between success and stagnation once in office. This event, the latest in the Institute for Government’s General Election programme, discussed a new IfG report – Preparing for government: How oppositions should ready themselves for power – which sets out how to prepare for a possible transition into government.
     
    Joining us to the discuss the report and its findings was an expert panel, including:
     

    Wes Ball, former Director of the Parliamentary Labour Party

    Baroness Fall, former Deputy Chief of Staff to David Cameron

    Dr Catherine Haddon, Programme Director at the Institute for Government

    Lord Macpherson, former Permanent Secretary at HM Treasury (2005–16)

     
    The event was chaired by Joe Owen, Director of Impact at the Institute for Government.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Earlier this month Lord Maude, who served as Minister for the Cabinet Office from 2010-2015, published his Independent Review of Governance and Accountability in the Civil Service. The comprehensive review saw Maude speak to former and present civil service leaders, minister and ex-ministers, former Prime Ministers, and many civil servants. Maude concludes that “the arrangements for governance and accountability of the civil service are unclear, opaque and incomplete”, and that the centre of government has become "unwieldy, with confusion about where responsibilities lie."
    So what is Lord Maude’s plan to fix these problems and how would his 57 recommendations work? Ministers have reacted coolly to Maude’s plan to split the Treasury and create an Office of Budget and Management, but is he right? What responsibilities should the Cabinet Secretary hold? And what can be done to ensure this review of the civil service succeeds when so many previous attempts have failed?
    To discuss these questions and more, Lord Maude joined us in conversation at the Institute for Government. The event was chaired by Alex Thomas, Programme Director at the Institute for Government.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • After Rishi Sunak used the recent Conservative Party Conference to pitch himself as the ‘change’ candidate, the Autumn Statement on 22 November was Jeremy Hunt’s first opportunity to set out the government’s new tax and spending plans. But what the Prime Minister and Chancellor can offer will in part be shaped by the new economic and fiscal forecasts they were given by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the UK’s independent fiscal watchdog.
    So, what does the Autumn Statement reveal about this government’s approach to economic and fiscal policy? How has the economic and fiscal outlook changed since March and how might that shape the general election campaign? Does the government have any new plans to try to boost growth and household incomes? What do the government’s public spending plans look like – and are they plausible?
    To explore these questions and more, our expert panel included:
    • Anoosh Chakelian, Britain Editor of the New Statesman
    • Stuart Hoddinott, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Government
    • Richard Hughes, Chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility
    • Thomas Pope, Deputy Chief Economist at the Institute for Government
    The event was chaired by Hannah White, Director of the Institute for Government.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • High standards are crucial for maintaining public trust in the police – but in recent years the reputation of the Metropolitan Police has been damaged by a number of scandals.
    Sir Mark Rowley was appointed as Met Commissioner in September 2022 with a mandate to bring in higher standards of policing, reduce crime rates, and deliver more trust in the Met Police. At this Institute for Government event, the Commissioner set out how he intends to achieve his priorities, including through changes to police structures, improved leadership, and the New Met for London plan.
    The event was chaired by Emma Norris, Deputy Director at the Institute for Government. Following his brief opening remarks, the Commissioner took part in a Q&A with the in-person and online audience.
     
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Public services were hit hard by the pandemic, which exacerbated existing performance problems and pressures on staff. High inflation and widespread strikes have since caused further disruption.
    Ahead of the Autumn Statement, this event brought together an expert panel to discuss:
    • How does public service performance compare to pre-pandemic levels?
    • How can the government recruit and retain sufficient staff to improve public service performance?
    • What are the key public service challenges that will be faced by the winner of the next election?
    As the Institute for Government and the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) publish the latest edition of Performance Tracker which features new analysis on the performance of public services, Nick Davies, Programme Director at the Institute for Government, presented the key findings. He was joined by Stephen Bush, Associate Editor and columnist at the Financial Times, and Baroness Morris, Chair of the Lords Public Services Committee.
    The event was chaired by Emma Norris, Deputy Director of the Institute for Government, with opening remarks by Jeffrey Matsu, Chief Economist at CIPFA.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Rishi Sunak has until December 2024 to call an election. While the formal starting pistol has yet to be fired, and may not be for at least a year, the long campaign has already begun. Both Sunak and Starmer are presenting themselves as the change candidate and the person to fix a country that – they both argue – is struggling to find its way.
    Kicking off the Institute's General Election programme, this event reflected on the opening pitches of the two main parties at their recent conferences. It will ask what change the country, government and political system needs, what change the voters want, and whether either party has a plan to deliver it.
    Joining us were:
    • Kelly Beaver, Chief Executive of Ipsos in the UK and Ireland
    • Lord Mandelson, Chairman of Global Counsel and former minister in the Blair and Brown governments
    • Kate McCann, Political Editor at Times Radio
    • Lord Willetts, President of the Resolution Foundation and former minister in the Major and Cameron governments
    The event was chaired by Emma Norris, Deputy Director at the Institute for Government.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • To mark the publication of her new book, The Women Who Made Modern Economics, Rachel Reeves MP sat down with IfG's Chief Economist, Dr Gemma Tetlow.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Twenty-five years after the Scotland Act established the devolved Scottish government and parliament, the future of devolution and Scotland’s place in the Union remain contentious issues. The SNP continues to advocate for Scottish independence. Meanwhile, the UK government has pursued a strategy of ‘muscular unionism’. Scottish Labour has called for a new approach, based on greater cooperation between UK and Scottish governments, and for stronger local government within Scotland. So what does Scotland’s constitutional future hold?
    The Institute for Government was delighted to welcome Anas Sarwar MSP, Leader of the Scottish Labour Party. How can Scottish devolution be strengthened? What might a future Labour government at Westminster mean for relations with Holyrood? And what is Sarwar’s vision for Scotland’s place in a reformed Union?
    To discuss these questions and more, Anas Sarwar was in conversation with Dr Hannah White, Director of the Institute for Government, followed by Q&A with the live and online audience.
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

  • Questions about standards in public life have dominated politics in recent years. As Chair of the independent Committee on Standards in Public Life since 2018, Lord Evans KCB DL has been at the heart of these debates, leading the committee’s work to define and uphold ethical standards across the public sector. 
     
    As Lord Evans reaches the end of his five-year term, he joined the Institute for Government to reflect on the work of the committee and the UK’s approach to standards in public life more broadly. He discussed how the standards landscape has changed, the challenges he anticipates, and how he would like to see public standards strengthened in future. 
     
    After his speech, Lord Evans was in conversation with Dr Hannah White, Director of the Institute for Government. There was an opportunity for questions from the audience. 
    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices