Episódios
-
Welcome to Episode 7 of UPC UNFILTERED—your concise, AI-powered guide to the latest Unified Patent Court decisions.
Based on Professor Willem Hoyng’s authoritative analysis, this week’s episode covers highlights from Week 18 of 2025, including:
• Juul v NJOY – Court of Appeal grants an exceptional stay pending EPO appeal
• Kinexon v Ballinno – Patent revoked; Central Division confirms inventive step is a matter of law, not fact
• InterDigital v Disney – Language of proceedings changed from German to EnglishWhile our voices are digital, our insights are real. Still, some details may occasionally be slightly off—and names may be mispronounced.
Prefer to read the full written version? Access the complete commentary, including links to the decisions, here:
👉 https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-18-2025/Brought to you by HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER — we do IP.
-
Welcome to Episode 6 of UPC UNFILTERED—your concise, AI-powered guide to the latest Unified Patent Court decisions.
Based on Professor Willem Hoyng’s authoritative analysis, this week’s episode covers highlights from Week 17 of 2025, including:
• Confidentiality issues: Orthovox v Mammut and Nicoventures v NJOY/Juul
• Bifurcation in the name of efficiency: Labrador v BioMérieux
• JR outlines key issues ahead of the hearing: Dish v Aylo
• Injunction granted, but only for France: Seoul Viosys v Laser ComponentsWhile our voices are digital, our insights are real. Still, some details may occasionally be slightly off—and names may be mispronounced.
Prefer to read the full written version? Access the complete commentary including links to the decisions here:
👉 https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-17-2025/Brought to you by HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER — we do IP.
-
Estão a faltar episódios?
-
Welcome to Episode 5 of UPC UNFILTERED—your concise, AI-powered guide to the latest Unified Patent Court decisions.
Based on Professor Willem Hoyng’s authoritative analysis, this week’s episode covers highlights from Week 16 of 2025, including:
• Syngenta v Sumi Agro (UPC_CFI_566/2024; 39/2025): LD Munich allows claim change to include non-UPC EPC states post–BSH v Electrolux.
• Kunststoff Nehl v Häfele (UPC_CFI_526/2024): 80 auxiliary requests cut to 10—a clear message on procedural economy.
• Seoul Viosys v Expert Klein (UPC_CFI_363/2023; 677/2024): Claim dismissed for being one day late—strict deadlines strictly enforced.
• Bekaert v Siltronic (UPC_CFI_539/2024): Evidentiary seizure upheld—broad powers under R. 196 RoP confirmed.
• Emboline v AorticLab (UPC_CFI_628/2024): Full security for costs imposed on counterclaim—access-to-justice concerns raised.While our voices are digital, our insights are real. Still, some details may occasionally be slightly off—and names may be butchered.
Prefer to read the full written version? Access the complete commentary here:
https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-16-2025/Brought to you by HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER — we do IP.
-
Welcome to Episode 4 of UPC UNFILTERED—your concise, AI-powered guide to the latest Unified Patent Court decisions.
Based on Professor Willem Hoyng’s authoritative analysis, this week’s episode covers highlights from Week 15 of 2025, including:
Dainese v Alpinestars (UPC_CFI_472/2024 & UPC_CFI_792/2024): Critical issues on claim amendments and UPC jurisdiction.
Härtwich v Talbert (UPC_CFI_50/2024): Joint development agreements and compensation for unauthorized use of a patent application.
TGI v AIM (UPC_CoA_169/2025): Leave to change or amendmend the claim (R. 263 RoP) and the addition of a defendant.
EOFlow v Insulet (UPC_CFI_597/2024): Rejection of late filed prior art documents, security for costs.
Tridonic v Cupower (UPC_CFI_459/2023): Correction of judgment the details of a judgment.
Prefer to read the full, written version? Access the complete commentary here: https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-15-2025/
Brought to you by HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER — we do IP.
-
Welcome to the third AI-powered episode of UPC UNFILTERED—your go-to source for sharp, weekly commentary on the latest Unified Patent Court decisions.
Based on Willem Hoyng’s authoritative analysis, this episode covers the highlights from Week 14 of 2025, including decisions on claim amendments, opt-out withdrawals, jurisdiction over pre-UPCA acts, security for costs, and the problem-solution approach.
Tailored for patent professionals, this concise and accessible episode brings you up to speed quickly—no fluff, just essential insights.
Prefer to read the full, written version? Access the complete commentary here:
https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-14-2025Brought to you by HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER — we do IP.
-
Welcome to the second AI-powered episode of UPC UNFILTERED, your go-to source for sharp, weekly commentary on the latest Unified Patent Court decisions. Based on Willem Hoyng’s authoritative analysis, this episode covers the highlights from Week 13 of 2025, including rulings on jurisdictional objections, bifurcation, confidentiality in cost proceedings, and more.
Tailored for patent professionals, this concise and accessible episode brings you up to speed quickly—no fluff, just essential insights.
Brought to you by HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER—we do IP.
-
Welcome to the inaugural episode of UPC UNFILTERED, your premier source for incisive, weekly commentary on the latest Unified Patent Court decisions. In this first AI-powered episode, we delve into key rulings from Week 12 of 2025, as analyzed by Prof. Willem Hoyng.
Topics include confidentiality measures in cost proceedings, jurisdictional challenges concerning the UPC's alignment with EU law, and procedural considerations for amending claims and adding defendants. Designed for patent professionals, this concise and accessible episode delivers essential insights without the fluff.
Brought to you by HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER—we do IP.
