Episoder

  • Subscriber-only episode

    In this episode of Talking D&T, I delve into the historical context and the reasons behind my decision to start the "Shaping Design and Technology Education" series. I reflect on the conversations and committees formed to discuss the state and future of D&T education in England, drawing parallels to the development of the national curriculum in 1990 and 2013. I express my concerns about the representation and balance of stakeholders in these committees, emphasizing the importance of power, legitimacy, and urgency in shaping the curriculum.

    I also discuss my contribution to a Festschrift in honor of Professor Mark De Vries, where I propose a new approach to developing the D&T curriculum. Instead of writing a new curriculum, I suggest a framework for evaluating proposed changes and identifying the appropriate stakeholder group. This framework consists of seven criteria, including the subject's epistemology, aims, inclusivity, values, real-world relevance, and feasibility across educational settings.

    Throughout the episode, I emphasize the need to view the development of the D&T curriculum as a design project, with each iteration being a resolution relevant to its time. I also highlight the importance of involving teachers at the micro-level, as they have the greatest power, legitimacy, and urgency in delivering the curriculum.

    Mentioned in this episode
    Documents from the 1990s government directive on the D&T curriculum
    Bob McCormick's paper on designing the D&T curriculum by committee
    The 2013 D&T curriculum - the first version
    Abstract of Alison Hardy's book chapter for the Festschrift in honor of Professor Mark De Vries
    Information about the "Redesigning D&T" project





    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • In this introductory episode of the second series of my Talking D&T podcast for 2024, I discuss the focus of the upcoming series on shaping design and technology education in England. The series, running from April to August 2024, will feature international speakers sharing their perspectives on the subject in their respective countries.

    I explain the catalysts behind the series, including the decline in the number of pupils studying GCSE design and technology and proposals for transforming the curriculum. I have been attending various national meetings about the subject's current state and future development, hosted by organizations such as the Design Council. My podcast aims to bring these conversations to a wider audience and engage them in the discussion.

    I have divided the series into three parts, focusing on design and technology's current status in England, what people think about this, and what is being done to address the issues. I have invited a diverse range of guests, including representatives from exam boards, subject associations, and international voices. I hope that listeners will find the series engaging and encourage them to get involved in the conversation by sharing their ideas and opinions. The first public episode will be released on April 16th, 2024, with a subscription-only episode available on April 11th for teachers and other subscribers to prompt further thinking based on the context of shaping design and technology education.

    Mentioned in the episode
    Design Council: An independent charity and the government's advisor on design. Matilda Agace will discuss the organisation's role in shaping D&T education.

    Design and Technology Association, the only professional association for D&T education in the UK, actively involved in conversations about the subject's future.

    Crafts Council: The national charity for craft in the UK. Nikki Dewar will discuss their perspective on D&T education and the role of craft.

    Pearson's proposal, put forward by this education company, has served as a catalyst for current conversations and meetings surrounding the future of D&T education in England.



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Manglende episoder?

    Klik her for at forny feed.

  • Subscriber-only episode

    In this follow-up episode to my conversation with Phil Jones about Remke's paper on intrinsic motivation, I delve deeper into the concepts of motivation and expectancy, drawing from my doctoral research and my chapter in the "Learning to Teach Design and Technology" book. I explore the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, emphasising that intrinsic motivation comes from within the pupils, such as the satisfaction of mastering complex tasks or learning something new, while extrinsic motivation stems from external rewards like passing exams or pursuing a particular career.

    I argue that teachers should consider both short-term and long-term relevance when planning lessons, as well as the cost-benefit balance for pupils in terms of stress, effort, and hard work. Using personal examples from my own schooling experience, I illustrate how a teacher's intervention and support can help students overcome challenges and develop their skills within their zone of proximal development.

    Throughout the episode, I stress the importance of teachers conducting research in their classrooms to challenge assumptions and understand pupils' motivations better. By being aware of the complexities surrounding intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, teachers can create more engaging and effective learning experiences in design and technology. I invite listeners to share their thoughts on the conversation with Phil, and Remke's paper, and how it may have influenced their understanding of motivation in the classroom.

    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

    Mentioned in this episode
    Learning to Teach Design and Technology
    Klapwijk, R. (2023). Secondary Students Intrinsic Motivation during Multidisciplinary STEAM projects : A quantitative study on the influence of competence, autonomy and relatedness in secondary Dutch classrooms. The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Retrieved from https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/997



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • In this episode of Talking D&T, I interview Phil Jones, a full-time D&T teacher and subject leader at a school in Merseyside, who is also a part-time doctoral student at Liverpool John Moores University. Phil shares his experience as part of the organizing committee for the PATT (Pupils' Attitude Towards Technology) conference and discusses a paper that grabbed his attention during the event.

    The paper, authored by Remke Klapwijk from the Netherlands, explores secondary students' intrinsic motivation during multidisciplinary STEAM projects. Phil and I delve into the study's findings, which surprisingly showed no significant effect on motivation despite the initial hypothesis. We also discuss the implications of these results for teaching practice and the importance of challenging assumptions about the impact of multidisciplinary projects on student motivation.

    Phil also provides insights into his own doctoral research, which focuses on design thinking at Key Stage 3 D&T and the relationship between skills and knowledge. He explains his data collection methods, including using validated instruments, portfolios, presentations, student field notes, and focus groups. We discuss the value of pursuing postgraduate studies as a D&T teacher and the importance of research in providing an evidence base for the subject's impact. Finally, we reflect on the benefits of presenting at conferences, such as receiving valuable feedback and engaging with the wider D&T community.


    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

    Mentioned in the show

    Phil on LinkedIn Work Upton SchoolKlapwijk, R. (2023). Secondary Students Intrinsic Motivation during Multidisciplinary STEAM projects : A quantitative study on the influence of competence, autonomy and relatedness in secondary Dutch classrooms. Learning to Teach Design and TechnologyTechnasiumIntrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI)



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Subscriber-only episode

    In this episode of Talking D&T, I delve into the complex topic of teaching children to understand and articulate the agency and values inherent in designed objects. Inspired by my recent conversation with Alice about object agency, I reflect on the challenges and importance of equipping students with the knowledge and language necessary to critically examine the technological world around them.

    Throughout the episode, I explore the limitations of simplistic frameworks like Access FM and emphasise the need for teachers to strategically select content that builds students' knowledge base over time. I introduce David Layton's list of values as a potentially powerful tool for structuring lessons around technical, economic, aesthetic, social, environmental, moral and spiritual dimensions of objects. However, I argue that such frameworks are only effective if students have the requisite understanding of materials, processes, and terminology to engage in meaningful analysis.

    As I grapple with the complexity of teaching design and technology, I emphasize the importance of spiraling knowledge development and providing opportunities for students to practice applying their understanding to decode the implicit and explicit values embedded in designed objects.

    Ultimately, I position the ability to critically examine object agency and values as a crucial aspect of design and technology education. I challenge teachers to move beyond superficial engagement with frameworks and to instead focus on equipping students with the rich knowledge and language needed to participate successfully in a complex designed world. My insights highlight the thought and care required to effectively support students in navigating an increasingly technological landscape.


    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)




    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • In this episode, Alice Hellard and I explore the impact of design on our lives and society. Alice's work highlights the importance of design education in navigating modern complexities, emphasising student agency and the dynamic relationship between humans and their environment.

    We talk about how objects like smartphones influence behaviors and interactions, prompting a shift in educational focus towards process over outcomes. Everyday objects are also examined as a means of exploring personal values and political expression - hear me get very excited talking about the Memphis design movement!

    Some of the topics we discuss are challenging to us both and maybe to listeners as well. We talk about ethical considerations in design education as we reflect on aesthetics, materials, and socio-political contexts plus we explore cultural biases in museums and classrooms, and other social issues such as gender inequality.

    Overall, we hope the episode offers an insightful exploration of the ethical dimensions of design, encouraging active engagement and reflection.


    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)





    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Subscriber-only episode

    Have you ever walked into a corporate foyer and felt as though you've stepped into a modern-day cathedral, with its grandeur either welcoming you or intimidating you? Now imagine that as a learning space for D&T...

    Join Alison in this episode as she explores that potential connections between space, values, and D&T education. Reflecting on personal experiences and professional insights, Alison examines the impact physical environments could have on pupils' learning, from corporate offices to renowned museums.

    Alison talks about how design choices communicate inclusivity or exclusivity, and how teachers can use these choices as learning points with pupils.

    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)




    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Subscriber-only episode

    In this podcast episode, Alison discusses inclusive research practices and the significance of diversity within design and technology (D&T) education. Drawing from her conversation with Sarah Davies, Alison emphasises the inclusion of children as active participants and the importance of their work as valuable data in research. Additionally, she underscores the need to consider ethnicity, gender, and other aspects of diversity in research to ensure representation and inclusivity.

    Alison also promotes building research networks, providing practical tips for collaboration and knowledge sharing.



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • This is the first part of a conversation with Alice Hellard from Goldsmiths. We unravel the complexities of agency, design and objects agency in museum settings. Alice's research, presented at PATT40, looks at the often-overlooked emotional and philosophical connections we form with objects, and how these relationships are shaped by historical practices and curatorial decisions. Her research underscores the importance of bridging the gap between students and the items they study, challenging the conventional wisdom of design and technology education to foster a more profound understanding amongst students.

    Throughout our conversation, we dissect the nuanced power dynamics of museum displays, using examples like nude heels and the globalization of fashion to illustrate the limitations of current curatorial practices and their impact on cultural representation. We share our personal stories with iconic design pieces that evoke deep emotional responses, emphasizing their significance in our lives. Alice champions a future where museums not only exhibit objects but also facilitate immersive experiences that democratize design comprehension. By the end of this episode, you'll be inspired to think differently about the role of design in our lives and the potential it has to shape our relationship with the world.

    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Are you a D&T teacher or researcher navigating the complex world of academic writing and conferences?

    Unlock the mysteries of academic publishing as I sit down with Sarah Davies, the editor-in-chief of the PATT40 conference. This week's episode explores the layers of the paper submission process, offering a comprehensive look at the journey from abstract to publication. We dissect the peer review system, emphasising its crucial role in fostering equality, diversity, and inclusion. If you're interested in what happens when you submit a paper, tune in to gain a deeper understanding of the supportive framework that upholds the integrity of educational research, and the collaborative efforts that ensure a manageable flow of contributions .

    Concluding with a nod to the power of research, we examine the themes that came from the PATT40 conference: teaching methods, curriculum design, and assessment strategies , with a special focus on how D&T classroom studies can influence broader educational conversations

    In our conversation, Sarah reveals the confidence and empowerment that arise when teachers actively participate in research, arming them with the tools to challenge conventional wisdom and advocate for subject-specific teaching approaches. This episode is a testament to the collective wisdom of the D&T teaching community and a "how-to" for those poised to make a difference through their research.

    (Text generated by AI, edited, a little, by Alison Hardy)

    Links
    Home - Camtree website supporting close-to-practice research for teachers
    Researching D&T website
    Masculinities and Femininities in the Design and Technology Classroom
    Promoting Creativity in the Secondary Design and Technology Classroom in England

    Find Sarah
    Threads

    LinkedIn



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Subscriber-only episode

    Could your curiosity be the key to unlocking new frontiers in design and technology education?
    This episode is a celebration, not just of the rigorous academic process, but of the spirit of learning that's at the heart of teaching. I talk about how Alex's approach to research, his refreshing transparency, and the significant topic of 'non-academic intelligences' gives a new way of thinking about research.






    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • This week I'm talking with Alex, artist and lecturer in environmental design, and Sam, the design and technology curriculum lead at Oak National Academy.

    Alex's research, presented at PATT40, is the starting point of the conversation. He focuses on the often-overlooked non-verbal intelligences and offers a fresh perspective on how we might better assess different cognitive strengths.

    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

    Find Alex online

    Website

    LinkedIn

    Find Sam online
    Website

    LinkedIn

    Greenhalgh, A. A. (2023) “‘If D&T wasn’t so easy, I wouldn’t be so good at it’: Nonverbal Ability and Confidence”, The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Available at: https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/1731 (Accessed: 5 February 2024).



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Subscriber-only episode

    In this week's subscription episode, I unpack the complexities of assessing design and technology capability, emphasising the significance of real-time assessments. Using published literature, I question England's current non-examined assessment (NEAs - coursework) approach

    Listen in and be inspired to rethink how we evaluate our students' grasp of design and technological knowledge.

    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)



    Links/ Mentioned in the episode

    R Kimbell, & K Stables, Researching design learning: issues and findings from two decades of research and development. Springer, 2008.

    R. Kimbell, Examining the reliability of Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) as an assessment tool in educational settings. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Volume 32, pages 1515 to1529.




    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • This week I chat with Neil Wright, whose unique path from the electronics industry to education brings a fresh perspective to his students at William Farr School. He talks with me about his attendance at the PATT-40 conference, sponsored by WF Education Group, where he had the opportunity to learn from and talk with D&T educational thought leaders.

    In today's conversation, we delve into the world of Adaptive Comparative Judgment using RM Compare software.

    The episode culminates with me encouraging Neil to do some research on his own practice to share with other teachers. We also consider the sharing of research within the D&T educational community.

    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

    Links

    Work webpage: William Farr C of E Comprehensive School - HomeLinkedIn: Neil Wright Got Feedback: https://feedback.gotlearning.comWF Education group/ Technology SuppliesRM Compare

    Paper

    Buckley, J., Seery, N. and Kimbell, R. (2023) “Modelling approaches to combining and comparing independent adaptive comparative judgement ranks”, The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Available at: https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/1570 (Accessed: 25 January 2024).



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Subscriber-only episode

    I discuss AI in D&T education with insights from my recent chat with Joanne Taylor. I explore in more depth the paper from the PATT 40 conference that probes the dual nature of AI as both a creative catalyst and a potential disruptor for future creativity. In this episode I take a deep dive into the use of AI for generating images from text and the implications of teaching such technology in schools.

    Joanne's observations on Tuesday set the stage for an exploration of AI's role within the classroom and beyond, showcasing how it can serve as a design strategy on par with traditional methods like brainstorming. I'll share how AI is not just another tool but a piece of conceptual knowledge.

    Links

    Ringvold, T. A., Strand, I., Haakonsen, P. and Saasen Strand, K. (2023) “AI Text-to-Image Generation in Art and Design Teacher Education: A Creative Tool or a Hindrance to Future Creativity?”, The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Available at: https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/1350 (Accessed: 16 January 2024).
    Learning to Teach Design and Technology

    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Prepare to have your perspective on art and design education challenged as I sit down with Joanne Taylor, after the PATT 40 conference. She's here to share her thoughts on research from Oslo Metropolitan University on how AI text-to-image generators like Mid-journey, Dali-E, and Stable Diffusion are revolutionising the field. We dissect the conference highlights and reflect on the importance of staying abreast with academic research, you'll discover the keys to nurturing evidence-based learning in our ever-evolving educational landscape.

    This week's discussion goes beyond mere tools, probing into the ethical terrain where technology meets education. We're tackling topics like combating bias, fostering originality, and ensuring that our students' innovation is expressed with clarity and depth. With Joanne's take on the ethical implications of AI in design and the importance of traditional skills in harmonising with new technologies, we share some thoughts about how AI can be used to guide your students into the future.

    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

    Ringvold, T. A., Strand, I., Haakonsen, P., & Saasen Strand, K. (2023). AI Text-to-Image Generation in Art and Design Teacher Education: A Creative Tool or a Hindrance to Future Creativity?. The 40th International Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology Conference Proceedings 2023, 1(October). Retrieved from https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/PATT40/article/view/1350

    Links
    Dall-E
    Stable Diffusion
    Midjourney
    Paul Russell at Loughborough University

    To connect with Joanne:
    LinkedIn

    jtdesignandtechnology.com





    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Subscriber-only episode

    In this episode I explore how teachers can enhance their classrooms through research and writing. Using the example of design fiction to spark students' imagination, I explain how reflective, research practice can be a powerful tool for professional development. I explain the steps D&T teachers can take to incorporate research into their teaching strategies, creating an environment where creativity flourishes and success criteria are clear.

    Discover how engaging with published research can provide significant benefits for design and technology teachers. I explain the importance of community contributions like the PATT40 conference papers and offer advice on navigating academic papers with ease, using resources like the Researching D&T website.

    My aim is to build a collective knowledge base that not only enriches D&T teaching practice but also boosts the reputation of D&T.

    Links

    Researching D&T website

    Learning to Teach Design and Technology: Chapter 17 by Professor Stephanie Atkinson

    Action Research

    PATT40 papers

    Design Fiction paper

    Roberts, P. (2001). Aspects of research concerning design education. Paper presented at the Idater, 10-30.

    Related podcast episodes

    23 Where do I find D&T research?

    45 Why D&T teachers will benefit from doing a masters (IMO)

    49 Getting started with writing about D&T

    65 Talking lockdown and ethics with Daniela Schillaci Rowland



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Step into the world of the PATT 40 conference with Dr. Matt McLain, who shares his insights and experiences from this groundbreaking event. As the conference chair, Matt explains the conference's aim to unite design and technology research, and classroom practice in a meaningful symphony. In this episode we talk about the conference's emphasis on diversity, its aim to incorporate teachers in research, and the celebration of plurality within D&T education. The PATT conference is the international space for sharing D&T research and the dedication to making academic research not just accessible but actionable for educators on the front lines.

    We discuss the personal triumphs and collective achievements of the recent PATT40 conference.

    The expertise of three teachers, who I'm working with, brought a co-authored paper to life, as an example of how the conference was committed to teacher-involved research.

    The Liverpool PATT conference was a landmark as the first completely face to face meeting since the COVID pandemic. As we close the episode, Matt and mine's thoughts turn to the future—pondering a position that beckons with the potential to further academic and teaching aspirations.

    (Text generated by AI, edited by Alison Hardy)

    Links
    PATT40 papers
    PATT40 website
    EdD at Nottingham Trent University



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • This episode is unusual in that there is also a video that goes alongside it where you can see me and Ciaran talking as I am live editing his debate that he's submitted as an example of a response to one of the contentious questions.

    Link to the video: https://youtu.be/QrBNYNC7fo8

    Episode transcript

    Mentioned in this episode:

    Link to the video: https://youtu.be/QrBNYNC7fo8

    Find out more about the project and how to get involved:

    Guidance for responding: 'Have Your Say'

    18 questions

    How to respond to the questions: use this link to upload your responses: https://ntupsychology.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_e3uA5bBcRdmPD5s







    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    Support the show

    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!

  • Subscriber-only episode


    This is a follow on from Tuesday's episode with more detail about why I made the suggestions I did to the Design Council event about what can be done to develop and improve D&T in England.

    Episode transcript



    Ciaran Ellis posted a thought-provoking question on LinkedIn recently: Do design decisions involve value judgements?

    What do you think? Join the conversation over on LinkedIn and let us know what you think. 


    If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

    Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

    If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

    If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

    If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!