Episoder
-
Precious Muir, a British model and broadcaster, recently shared unsettling accounts of her experiences at Sean "Diddy" Combs' infamous parties. She described how these gatherings were laden with predatory behavior, drugs, and a toxic environment aimed at exploiting young women. Muir reflected that many attendees, including models like herself, were lured by the promise of advancing their careers but found themselves in risky situations. She emphasized that her decision to avoid drugs saved her life, noting that several others who participated developed severe addictions or faced tragic outcomes
Muir recounted that some of these events, starting as daytime parties, devolved into disturbing scenes at night, including graphic sexual behavior. Shockingly, she mentioned the presence of children at these gatherings, questioning how such an inappropriate environment could allow that. Her narrative aligns with broader allegations against Diddy, who is currently under scrutiny following numerous accusations of sexual misconduct from over 120 individuals. Muir expressed no surprise at his recent arrest, implying that his behavior at these parties always carried a sinister undertone.
(commercial at 8:54)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source: -
Gary Betzner’s life is a tale of extraordinary twists and deceptions, as chronicled in the HBO documentary The Invisible Pilot. Betzner was an Arkansas crop duster turned drug smuggler who, in 1977, faked his death by leaping off a bridge. His apparent suicide was a cover to evade law enforcement after being caught in a large DEA sting involving drug trafficking.
With the help of his wife, who acted as a grieving widow, Betzner disappeared and assumed new identities. He re-emerged in the drug trade, working for figures like Pablo Escobar, smuggling drugs into the U.S. He later became involved with the CIA, using his piloting skills to transport weapons to the Contras during the Iran-Contra affair while simultaneously smuggling cocaine on behalf of Colombian cartels.
Eventually, Betzner’s criminal exploits caught up with him, leading to his arrest and a 27-year prison sentence in 1984. He later cooperated with investigations into the Iran-Contra scandal, exposing his involvement and the CIA’s double-dealing. After serving his sentence, Betzner returned to Arkansas, where he currently lives, reflecting on the chaos of his past while maintaining his resentment toward the CIA for their betrayal.
(commercial at 14:47)
To contact me:
[email protected]
source:
https://nypost.com/2022/03/31/the-invisible-pilot-life-of-a-drug-smuggler-turned-cia-op/ -
Manglende episoder?
-
On April 7, 1972, Joseph "Crazy Joe" Gallo was shot and killed at Umberto's Clam House in Manhattan's Little Italy while celebrating his 43rd birthday. The hit occurred early in the morning, with Gallo dining alongside his wife, daughter, sister, and bodyguard. His presence at the restaurant was noticed by Joseph Luparelli, a member of the Colombo crime family, who alerted other Colombo associates nearby. Soon after, four gunmen entered the establishment and opened fire on Gallo.
Reports suggest that Gallo attempted to defend himself by overturning a table and drawing his own weapon, but he was hit multiple times, including in the back, elbow, and buttocks. Although he managed to stagger out of the restaurant, he collapsed on the street and was later pronounced dead at the hospital. Some accounts speculate that he was trying to divert the attackers away from his family as he exited the building.
The assassination is believed to be tied to long-standing tensions between Gallo and the Colombo family, especially after Joe Colombo was shot months earlier, with Gallo rumored to be behind the attack. The hit on Gallo remains a notorious mob killing, with different narratives about who exactly ordered and executed it, but no one was ever formally charged for the crime.
The scene of Gallo’s murder at Umberto’s Clam House became infamous, symbolizing the chaotic and violent underworld of the American Mafia at the time, as depicted in various mob-related books and movies over the years, including The Irishman and references in popular culture like Bob Dylan's song "Joey".
(commercial at 15:05)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
https://www.nytimes.com/1972/04/08/archives/joe-gallo-is-shot-to-death-in-little-italy-restaurant-joe-gallo.htm -
The journey through the court documents continues in this episode as we begin our look at Virginia Roberts response to Ghislaine Maxwell's brief of undisputed facts.
(commercial at 8:11)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org) -
The journey through the court documents continues in this episode as we begin our look at Virginia Roberts response to Ghislaine Maxwell's brief of undisputed facts.
(commercial at 8:25)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org) -
The journey through the court documents continues in this episode as we begin our look at Virginia Roberts response to Ghislaine Maxwell's brief of undisputed facts.
(commercial at 9:37)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org) -
The journey through the court documents continues in this episode as we begin our look at Virginia Roberts response to Ghislaine Maxwell's brief of undisputed facts.
(commercial at 8:25)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org) -
The journey through the court documents continues in this episode as we begin our look at Virginia Roberts response to Ghislaine Maxwell's brief of undisputed facts.
(commercial at 7:51)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org) -
Our look at the unredacted Epstein related files continues in this episode as we are now taking a look at Ghislaine Maxwell's statement of undisputable facts pursuant to local civil rule 56.1.
(commercial at 9:55)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud -
The very close ties that bind Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell have always been readily appararent for anyone who was interested in taking a gander at the years long relationship between the two and considering these close ties, is it any wonder that many people, including survivors of Jeffrey Epstein want Prince Andrew to answer some questions?
In this episode, we take a look at just how close Andrew and Maxwell were and how Prince Andrew would yell and scream at Palace guards if they ever attempted to stop Maxwell from gaining entry into the palace. Instead, they were ordered to just wave her through.
(commercial at 9:29)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
How Prince Andrew & Ghislaine Maxwell had ‘intimate relationship’ allowing her ‘come and go as she pleased from palace’ | The US Sun (the-sun.com) -
In the lawsuit between Diageo and Combs Wines, Sean "Diddy" Combs’ legal team submitted an opposition to Diageo’s motion to compel arbitration or dismiss the complaint. In this opposition, Combs argues that his claims, including requests for equitable relief, are not subject to arbitration under the terms of the joint venture agreement. The agreement's language, which allows for injunctive relief in cases of "irreparable harm," forms the basis of Combs' assertion that these matters should be handled in court.
Combs alleges that Diageo discriminated against his brand by limiting its distribution and failing to meet its obligations within their partnership, claims that, according to his team, merit judicial review rather than arbitration. The court agreed with Combs in an earlier ruling, allowing these equitable claims to proceed in court. Diageo, however, maintains that all disputes, including those for damages, should be resolved through arbitration and is appealing the court’s decision to deny its motion. The case continues to unfold as both sides contest the interpretation of the arbitration provisions and the scope of equitable relief allowed under the agreement.
(commercial at 8:28)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Combs_Wines_and_Spirit_v_Combs_Wines_and_Spirit_MEMORANDUM_OF_LAW_I_69.pdf (digitalmusicnews.com) -
In the lawsuit between Diageo and Combs Wines, Sean "Diddy" Combs’ legal team submitted an opposition to Diageo’s motion to compel arbitration or dismiss the complaint. In this opposition, Combs argues that his claims, including requests for equitable relief, are not subject to arbitration under the terms of the joint venture agreement. The agreement's language, which allows for injunctive relief in cases of "irreparable harm," forms the basis of Combs' assertion that these matters should be handled in court.
Combs alleges that Diageo discriminated against his brand by limiting its distribution and failing to meet its obligations within their partnership, claims that, according to his team, merit judicial review rather than arbitration. The court agreed with Combs in an earlier ruling, allowing these equitable claims to proceed in court. Diageo, however, maintains that all disputes, including those for damages, should be resolved through arbitration and is appealing the court’s decision to deny its motion. The case continues to unfold as both sides contest the interpretation of the arbitration provisions and the scope of equitable relief allowed under the agreement.
(commercial at 8:28)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Combs_Wines_and_Spirit_v_Combs_Wines_and_Spirit_MEMORANDUM_OF_LAW_I_69.pdf (digitalmusicnews.com) -
In the lawsuit between Diageo and Combs Wines, Sean "Diddy" Combs’ legal team submitted an opposition to Diageo’s motion to compel arbitration or dismiss the complaint. In this opposition, Combs argues that his claims, including requests for equitable relief, are not subject to arbitration under the terms of the joint venture agreement. The agreement's language, which allows for injunctive relief in cases of "irreparable harm," forms the basis of Combs' assertion that these matters should be handled in court.
Combs alleges that Diageo discriminated against his brand by limiting its distribution and failing to meet its obligations within their partnership, claims that, according to his team, merit judicial review rather than arbitration. The court agreed with Combs in an earlier ruling, allowing these equitable claims to proceed in court. Diageo, however, maintains that all disputes, including those for damages, should be resolved through arbitration and is appealing the court’s decision to deny its motion. The case continues to unfold as both sides contest the interpretation of the arbitration provisions and the scope of equitable relief allowed under the agreement.
(commercial at 8:19)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Combs_Wines_and_Spirit_v_Combs_Wines_and_Spirit_MEMORANDUM_OF_LAW_I_69.pdf (digitalmusicnews.com) -
Diageo submitted a memorandum in support of its motion to stay discovery in its lawsuit with Combs Wines and Spirits, arguing that ongoing discovery should be paused pending the resolution of its motion to compel arbitration. Diageo claims that their agreement with Combs Wines mandates arbitration for most disputes and that continuing discovery before resolving this procedural issue would be inefficient. The company also argues that allowing litigation and discovery to proceed could undermine the arbitration process and waste resources if arbitration is ultimately ordered to resolve the dispute.
In this episode, we get a look at that memorandum.
(commercial at 8:03)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
en-combs-wines-and-spirits-llc-v-diageo-north-america-inc-memorandum-of-law-in-support-of-diageo-north-america-inc-s-motion-to-stay-discovery-wednesday-5th-july-2023 (jusmundi.com) -
NDAs, or non-disclosure agreements, will not protect Sean "Diddy" Combs in his criminal trial because NDAs are primarily civil agreements designed to prevent parties from disclosing certain information publicly. However, they do not shield individuals from testifying in criminal cases. Criminal law supersedes any private agreements, as the government has a vested interest in prosecuting crimes and ensuring justice. Therefore, if someone has relevant knowledge about criminal activities, they can still be compelled to testify, even if they have signed an NDA.
In the case of Cassie Ventura, although she signed an NDA as part of her settlement with Diddy, this does not prevent her from being called to testify in a criminal trial. NDAs cannot override a subpoena or prevent someone from providing testimony if it pertains to criminal conduct. The court can compel Ventura to testify about any relevant events, even if they were covered by the terms of the NDA, as the pursuit of justice in criminal cases takes precedence over any civil agreement. Thus, despite the NDA, Cassie can be legally obligated to provide testimony in the ongoing criminal proceedings against Diddy.
(commercial at 7:57)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Cassie may be called to testify at Diddy trial despite signing NDA, lawyer says | Daily Mail Online -
In our affiliated series, we will profile the men and women who inhabit the world of organized crime and for our first installment, we present Tommy Pitera.
Tommy Pitera is a notorious American mobster who was heavily involved in organized crime during the late 20th century. Here is a summary of his life and criminal activities:
Early Life: Tommy Pitera was born on December 2, 1954, in Brooklyn, New York. He grew up in a neighborhood with strong ties to the Mafia and became associated with the Bonanno crime family.Criminal Career: Pitera became a member of the Bonanno crime family, one of the five major Italian-American Mafia families in New York City. He quickly rose through the ranks due to his ruthlessness and violent tendencies.Drug Trafficking: Pitera was primarily involved in drug trafficking, particularly in the distribution of heroin. He was known for his brutal methods of enforcing discipline and eliminating rivals, earning him the nickname "Tommy Karate" because of his proficiency in martial arts.Violent Murders: Pitera was responsible for numerous violent murders, many of which were carried out with extreme brutality. He was known for dismembering his victims to dispose of their bodies, making it difficult for law enforcement to solve the crimes.Arrest and Conviction: In 1992, Pitera was arrested and subsequently convicted on multiple charges, including murder, racketeering, and drug trafficking. His arrest was the result of extensive law enforcement efforts to dismantle the Bonanno crime family.Life Sentence: In 1994, Tommy Pitera was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. His conviction was based on the testimony of former associates who had turned state's witnesses, as well as physical evidence linking him to the murders.Imprisonment: Pitera is currently serving his life sentence in a federal prison in the United States. He is considered one of the most dangerous and violent mobsters in American history.Tommy Pitera's criminal activities and reputation for extreme violence have made him a notorious figure in the history of organized crime in the United States. His life story has been the subject of books, documentaries, and true crime discussions.
(commercial at 9:36)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
The butcher (nypost.com) -
Our look at the unredacted Epstein related files continues in this episode as we are now taking a look at Ghislaine Maxwell's statement of undisputable facts pursuant to local civil rule 56.1.
(commercial at 9:26)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud -
Our look at the unredacted Epstein related files continues in this episode as we are now taking a look at Ghislaine Maxwell's statement of undisputable facts pursuant to local civil rule 56.1.
(commercial at 10:05)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud -
Our look at the unredacted Epstein related files continues in this episode as we are now taking a look at Ghislaine Maxwell's statement of undisputable facts pursuant to local civil rule 56.1.
(commercial at 7:45)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud -
Our look at the unredacted Epstein related files continues in this episode as we are now taking a look at Ghislaine Maxwell's statement of undisputable facts pursuant to local civil rule 56.1.
(commercial at 9:15)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud - Vis mere
