Episoder

  • The Evil Creator: Origins of an Early Christian Idea by: M. David Litwa

    Existential Kink: Unmask Your Shadow and Embrace Your Power by: Carolyn Elliott

    The Ballad of the White Horse by: G. K. Chesterton

    American Cosmic: UFOs, Religion, Technology by: D.W. Pasulka

    Encounters: Experiences with Nonhuman Intelligences by: D.W. Pasulka

    Undreaming Wetiko: Breaking the Spell of the Nightmare Mind-Virus by: Paul Levy

  • A method for making better decisions should you ever find yourself in Kathmandu, or paying for SEO, or hoping to see the Supreme Court.

  • Manglende episoder?

    Klik her for at forny feed.

  • Self-Help Is Like a Vaccine: Essays on Living Better by: Bryan Caplan

    Anaximander: And the Birth of Science by: Carlo Rovelli

    The Social Conquest of Earth by: Edward O. Wilson

    The Intellectual Devotional: Revive Your Mind, Complete Your Education, and Roam Confidently with the Cultured Class by: David S. Kidder and Noah D. Oppenheim

    Building a StoryBrand: Clarify Your Message So Customers Will Listen by: Donald Miller

    The Power of Having Fun: How Meaningful Breaks Help You Get More Done by: Dave Crenshaw

    The Cartoon Introduction to Climate Change by: Yoram Bauman and Grady Klein

    The Little Book of Aliens by: Adam Frank

  • You have probably heard about Rotherham, and the child sex abuse rings that existed there (and may still be operating). As with so many things these days, this story entered the public discussion when Musk tweeted about it. For many people Iā€™ve talked to, this was the first theyā€™d heard of it. I actually spoke about about it in 2018. At the time I felt I was late to the game, but apparently I was six years ahead of most people. Given the story's re-emergence I thought it might be worth dusting off that old piece. I think it holds up pretty well, particularly the part about the woeful lack of reporting on the topic.

    I have lightly edited it, smoothing things out in a few places, adding commas, that sort of thing. Temporal references have not been updated, so when I say ā€œa week agoā€ Iā€™m referring to 2018.

    Even if youā€™ve already read a lot about these horrific crimes, there are a few takes in here that I havenā€™t seen elsewhere

  • Exactly five years ago, China identified a ā€œnovel coronavirusā€ and the world was introduced to the term ā€œwet marketā€. In the time since then arguments continue to rage about the source of the virus, the measures that were taken, and the vaccines that were created.

    In the midst of all these arguments, everyone seems to agree on one thing: extended school closures were a bad idea. Itā€™s very easy to continue on from that to assume the harms of such closures were obvious from the very beginningā€”that they happened only because we were blinded by fear. Some people donā€™t go quite so far, but nevertheless argue that such closures were implemented hastily and without much consideration. But consider this quote from the Michael Lewis book Premonition on the role of disease modeling:

    The graph illustrated the effects on a disease of various crude strategies: isolating the ill; quarantining entire households when they had a sick person in them; socially distancing adults; giving people antiviral drugs; and so on. Each of the crude strategies had some slight effect, but none by itself made much of a dent, and certainly none had the ability to halt the pandemic by driving the diseaseā€™s reproductive rate below 1. One intervention was not like the others, however: when you closed schools and put social distance between kids, the flu-like disease fell off a cliff. (The model defined ā€œsocial distanceā€ not as zero contact but as a 60 percent reduction in kidsā€™ social interaction.) ā€œI said, ā€˜Holy shit!ā€™ ā€ said Carter. ā€œNothing big happens until you close the schools. Itā€™s not like anything else. Itā€™s like a phase change. Itā€™s nonlinear. Itā€™s like when water temperature goes from thirty-three to thirty-two. When it goes from thirty-four to thirty-three, itā€™s no big deal; one degree colder and it turns to ice.

  • A Gentleman in Moscow by: Amor Towles

    The Humans by: Matt Haig

    Super-Cannes: A Novel by: J. G. Ballard

    Monster Hunter: International by: Larry Correia

    Monster Hunter: Vendetta by: Larry Correia

  • Three things converged for me recently and at the point of their convergence was the issue of placing women in frontline combat roles.

    The first leg of the convergence was the election of Donald Trump. Weā€™re still debating the reasons why he won, but certainly a reassertion of gender differences are near the top of everyoneā€™s list. For example, allowing natal men into womenā€™s sports.

    The second was Trumpā€™s nomination of Pete Hesgeth for Secretary of Defense. Hegsethā€™s nomination is controversial for a lot of reasons, but one of the controversies is his opinion that women should not be allowed into front line combat roles.

    Finally, I just got done watching the miniseries Band of Brothers, while at the same time re-reading the Stephen E. Ambrose book itā€™s based on. I would highly recommend the exercise (see my review of the book here.) In addition to being enjoyable it reminded me of how physical, grimy, and desperate combat can be. And of course the theme of both the book and the series is that Easy Company was so effective because they had developed strong bonds of brotherhood through the numerous challenges they overcame. These challenges include D-Day, Market Garden, liberating concentration camps, and finally being the first into Hitlerā€™s stronghold at Eagleā€™s Nest. But if you were to pick the hardest thing they did, it was probably defending Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge.

    Watching and reading about Bastogne was a sobering experience. It is also the point where the three things I just mentioned crystallized into this line of inquiry. Given that it might be helpful to give you a brief overview of the Siege of Bastogne...

  • Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict by: Ara Norenzayan

    A Brief History of Intelligence: Evolution, AI, and the Five Breakthroughs That Made Our Brains by: Max Bennett

    The Management of Savagery: How America's National Security State Fueled the Rise of Al Qaeda, ISIS, and Donald Trump by: Max Blumenthal

    What I Learned Losing a Million Dollars by: Jim Paul and Brendan Moynihan

    The Laws of Trading: A Trader's Guide to Better Decision-Making for Everyone by: Agustin Lebron

    Meditations for Mortals: Four Weeks to Embrace Your Limitations and Make Time for What Counts by: Oliver Burkeman

    Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne, from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest by: Stephen E. Ambrose

    The Small and the Mighty: Twelve Unsung Americans Who Changed the Course of History, from the Founding to the Civil Rights Movement by: Sharon McMahon

  • AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Canā€™t, and How to Tell the Difference by: Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor

    Country Driving: A Journey Through China from Farm to Factory by: Peter Hessler

    On Grand Strategy by: John Lewis Gaddis

    Leisure: The Basis of Culture by: Josef Pieper

    Anatomy of the State by: Murray Rothbard

    The ONE Thing: The Surprisingly Simple Truth Behind Extraordinary Results

    Alone on the Ice: The Greatest Survival Story in the History of Exploration by: David Roberts

    The Killer Angels: The Classic Novel of the Civil War by: Michael Shaara

  • He talks about the Village, and the River, but what we really need is a Redoubt.

    On the Edge: The Art of Risking Everything

    By: Nate Silver

    Published: 2024

    576 Pages

    Briefly, what is this book about?

    There are two different ways of approaching the world: the River, which thinks in terms of numbers, expected values, and quantification and the Village, which is the paternalistic expert class which manifests as the vast bureaucracy.

    What's the author's angle?

    I got the impression that Silver just wanted to write about things that interested him. Because of this, his thesis was kind of tacked on. That said, he is a fairly passionate advocate for things that interest him.

    Who should read this book?

    Silver is worried that people will skip the first half of the book which is about gambling, but in reality that was the best part, or at least the part I found to be novel. The second part is about Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), AI, and all the stuff youā€™ve already heard too much about if you spend much time online. With this in mind, I think there are three reasons to read this book:

    If you want a deep exploration of high-level poker playing.

    You have never heard of AI Risk or SBF.

    If you think my discussion of Silverā€™s model of the Village vs. the River is incomplete.

    Specific thoughts: An mashup of the election and this book

    ...

  • One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein, Volumes 1 & 2

    By: Whitney Alyse Webb

    Briefly, what are these books about?

    The alleged connections between organized crime and national intelligence agencies which led to the numerous illicit operations including Watergate, Iran-Contra, the JFK Assassination, and of course the entire Jeffrey Epstein mess.

    A key component of these operations was the tactic of collecting blackmail and using it to convince people to do things they otherwise wouldnā€™t.

    What's the author's angle?

    Charitably, Webb is an autodidact with an enormous command of facts and connections.

    Uncharitably, sheā€™s someone with a weak evidentiary filter making conspiratorial mountains out of tenuously connected molehills.

    Who should read these books?

    No one should just read them. You should either ignore them or study them intently as part of an ā€œIntro to Conspiracy Theoriesā€ curriculum. Of the two I would recommend the former. Read on to see why.

    I- How does one approach a book like this?

    ...

  • The Ocean at the End of the Lane by: Neil Gaiman

    There Is No Antimemetics Division by: qntm

    The Man Who Had All the Luck by: Arthur Miller

    How Green Was My Valley by: Richard Llewellyn

    Theft of Fire: Orbital Space #1 by: Devon Eriksen

    Assassin's Apprentice (The Farseer Trilogy, Book 1) by: Robin Hobb

    Royal Assassin (The Farseer Trilogy, Book 2) by: Robin Hobb

  • With the enormous increase in the power of AI (specifically LLMs) people are using them for all sorts of things, hoping to find areas where theyā€™re better, or at least cheaper than humans. FiveThirtyNine (get it?) is one such attempt, and they claim that AI can do forecasting better than humans.

    Scott Alexander, of Astral Codex Ten, reviewed the service and concluded that they still have a long way to go. I have no doubt that this is the case, but one can imagine that this will not always be the case. What then? My assertion would be that at the point when AI forecasting does ā€œworkā€ (should that ever happen) it will make the problems of superforecasting even worse.2

    I- The problems of superforecasting

    What are the problems of superforecasting?

    ...

  • The Untethered Soul: The Journey Beyond Yourself by: Michael A. Singer

    Chatter: The Voice in Our Head, Why It Matters, and How to Harness It by: Ethan Kross

    The Ruthless Elimination of Hurry: How to Stay Emotionally Healthy and Spiritually Alive in the Chaos of the Modern World by: John Mark Comer

    Dumb Money: The GameStop Short Squeeze and the Ragtag Group of Amateur Traders That Brought Wall Street to Its Knees by: Ben Mezrich

    Clear Thinking: Turning Ordinary Moments into Extraordinary Results by: Shane Parrish

  • Journey of the Mind: How Thinking Emerged from Chaos by: Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam

    Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States by: James C. Scott

    This post represents a new feature (experiment?) I plan to occasionally write posts which take advantage of one or more books I read recently, but which arenā€™t actually reviews of those books. See, for example, my last post: Superminds, States, and the Domestication of Humans.

    Despite the fact that the books feature heavily in these posts, I assume my adoring fans still want actual reviews. But it doesnā€™t make sense to wait until the next book review collection for those reviews to appear, nor does it make sense to cram the reviews into the original essay which was about something else. And so I thought that instead I would have the reviews quickly follow the essay as sort of supplementary material. So thatā€™s what this is. Let me know what you think.

  • How durable is the state? How resistant is it to being overthrown? How closely does it reflect our desires? Is it possible it has its own desires?

    But maybe more importantly how does all this affect the possibility of a very close election in November?

  • A narcissistic dialogue around ideas that are either annoyingly fractured or wholly unrealistic.

    DON'T DIE: Dialogues

    By: Bryan Johnson

    Published: 2023

    247 Pages

    Briefly, what is this book about?

    How best to extend the lifespan of humans and the lifetime of humanity presented in the form of a fictional dialogue between various aspects of the author's personality.

    What's the author's angle?

    Bryan Johnson is a biohacker who measures dozens and dozens of biomarkers. As a result of this he claims to be aging at 64/100th the normal rate. Heā€™s also a former and, as near as I can tell, disaffected member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

    Who should read this book?

    If youā€™re really into lifespan expansion, then maybe? Or similarly very concerned with X-risks? But I will warn you that the book is written in one of the more annoying styles Iā€™ve ever encountered. Not only does it directly impede the transmission of information, it actively works against its inclusion..

    Specific thoughts: A strange approach to X-risks...

  • Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890-1940 by: George Chauncey

    The Conservative Futurist: How to Create the Sci-Fi World We Were Promised by: James Pethokoukis

    Morning After the Revolution: Dispatches from the Wrong Side of History by: Nellie Bowles

    Every Man for Himself and God Against All: A Memoir by: Werner Herzog

    The Complete Maus: A Survivor's Tale by: Art Spiegelman

    The Master and Margarita by: Mikhail Bulgakov

    The Buried Giant: A Novel by: Kazuo Ishiguro

    Naked Defiance: A Comedy of Menace by: Patrik Sampler

    The Riddle of the Third Mile (Inspector Morse Series Book 6) by: Colin Dexter

    Dungeons & Dragons 2024 Player's Handbook (D&D Core Rulebook) lead designer: Jeremy Crawford

  • Transcript: https://www.wearenotsaved.com/p/divine-disappointment-and-mortal

    Is God Disappointed in Me?: Removing Shame from a Gospel of Grace

    By: Kurt Francom

    Published: 2024

    190 Pages

    Briefly, what is this book about?

    Our parents expect that we will do certain thingsā€”perhaps itā€™s cleaning our rooms, perhaps itā€™s becoming a doctorā€”when we don't, they're disappointed. We have a tendency to view God in the same fashion; He also has expectations, and when we fail to meet them we imagine that He is similarly disappointed. Francom claims this is a false belief. Because of Godā€™s omniscience and infinite love, He cannot be disappointed. When we think He might be it leads to shame, which prevents us from accessing His love.

    Whatā€™s the authorā€™s angle?

    Francom is the director of Leading Saints, an organization whose primary focus is providing advice and resources for the lay leadership of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Heā€™s also heavily involved with Warrior Heart a Christian menā€™s organization that runs retreats with a focus on addiction recovery. This book is part of those focuses and a personal expression of Francomā€™s approach to leadership and the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

    Whatā€™s My Angle?

    Iā€™ve known Francom for going on ten years. As such Iā€™ve been privy to his argument that God cannot be disappointed from his initial epiphany all the way down to his full, book-length treatment of the subject. As Iā€™ve watched the idea develop, Iā€™ve raised numerous objections. To Francomā€™s great credit most of these objections are at least acknowledged in the book. I suspect that I wasnā€™t the only one to raise these objections, but I fancy that he first heard of them from me.

    My name is listed in the bookā€™s acknowledgments but itā€™s pretty generic. I had hoped for something more like ā€œAnd thanks to Ross Richey, if not for his relentless criticism, unending negativity, poor character, and dark soul, the book would have been less accurate, but probably more inspiring.ā€

  • A City on Mars: Can We Settle Space, Should We Settle Space, and Have We Really Thought This Through? by: Kelly and Zach Weinersmith

    Ravenna: Capital of Empire, Crucible of Europe by: Judith Herrin

    The Birth of the West: Rome, Germany, France, and the Creation of Europe in the Tenth Century by: Paul Collins

    Missing: The Need for Closure After the Great War by: Richard van Emden

    In My Time of Dying: How I Came Face to Face with the Idea of an Afterlife by: Sebastian Junger

    Do Hard Things: Why We Get Resilience Wrong and the Surprising Science of Real Toughness by: Steve Magness

    Eruption by: James Patterson and Michael Crichton

    The Last Devil to Die: A Thursday Murder Club Mystery (#4) by: Richard Osman

    He Who Fights with Monsters 8: A LitRPG Adventure by: Shirtaloon

    He Who Fights with Monsters 9: A LitRPG Adventure by: Shirtaloon

    He Who Fights with Monsters 10: A LitRPG Adventure by: Shirtaloon