Episodes
-
A declaration of support of allegations in a civil or criminal complaint is a sworn statement made by a party involved in the case, typically the plaintiff or the prosecutor. This statement provides factual details and evidence supporting the claims or charges being made in the complaint. The purpose of such a declaration is to provide the court with relevant information and evidence to support the legal arguments being presented.
In civil cases, the declaration may include details about the events leading up to the dispute, any damages suffered, and any other pertinent information relevant to the case. In criminal cases, the declaration may contain information about the alleged criminal activity, evidence gathered by law enforcement, and witness statements.
The individual making the declaration typically signs it under penalty of perjury, meaning they attest to the truthfulness of the statements contained within the document. This adds legal weight to the allegations or claims being made in the complaint.
In this episode we take a look at the declaration made by Rodney Jones in support of his allegations against Diddy and the co-defendants.
(commercial at 10:30)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.34.2.pdf (courtlistener.com) -
A declaration of support of allegations in a civil or criminal complaint is a sworn statement made by a party involved in the case, typically the plaintiff or the prosecutor. This statement provides factual details and evidence supporting the claims or charges being made in the complaint. The purpose of such a declaration is to provide the court with relevant information and evidence to support the legal arguments being presented.
In civil cases, the declaration may include details about the events leading up to the dispute, any damages suffered, and any other pertinent information relevant to the case. In criminal cases, the declaration may contain information about the alleged criminal activity, evidence gathered by law enforcement, and witness statements.
The individual making the declaration typically signs it under penalty of perjury, meaning they attest to the truthfulness of the statements contained within the document. This adds legal weight to the allegations or claims being made in the complaint.
In this episode we take a look at the declaration made by Rodney Jones in support of his allegations against Diddy and the co-defendants.
(commercial at 9:26)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.34.2.pdf (courtlistener.com) -
Missing episodes?
-
Harve Pierre is a music industry executive, known primarily for his role as the President of Bad Boy Entertainment, a record label founded by Sean "Diddy" Combs. Pierre has been a key figure in the music business for over two decades, working closely with Diddy to oversee the label's operations and its roster of artists. He is known for his expertise in artist development, A&R (Artist and Repertoire), and overall strategic management within the music industry. Under his leadership, Bad Boy Entertainment has released numerous successful albums and singles, contributing to its significant impact on hip-hop and R&B music. Pierre's contributions have helped shape the careers of many prominent artists associated with Bad Boy, including The Notorious B.I.G., Faith Evans, and many others.
He now finds himself caught up in the maelstrom that has engulfed Diddy as he has been directly accused by the alleged under aged accuser.
In this episode, we take a look at his response.
(commercial at 9:03)
to contact me:
[email protected] -
Our journey into the heart of the allegations against Diddy continues in this episode, as we take a look at Diddy's response to the lawsuit filed against him by his alleged underaged accuser.
(commercial at 10:49)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Doe v. Combs | PDF | Complaint | Pleading (scribd.com) -
As we continue to lay the foundation for our deep dive into the investigation into Diddy, we are now pivoting to the allegations made against him by the unnamed 17 year old girl who claims she was also trafficked and abused by Diddy and his rogues gallery of alleged abusers.
(commercial at 8:28)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
New Jane Doe lawsuit against Diddy aka Sean Combs - DocumentCloud -
As we continue to lay the foundation for our deep dive into the investigation into Diddy, we are now pivoting to the allegations made against him by the unnamed 17 year old girl who claims she was also trafficked and abused by Diddy and his rogues gallery of alleged abusers.
(commercial at 7:46)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
New Jane Doe lawsuit against Diddy aka Sean Combs - DocumentCloud -
The court battle between Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán and the United States Government over Special Administrative Measures (SAMs) is centered around the stringent confinement conditions imposed on Guzmán after his extradition to the U.S. in 2017.Special Administrative Measures (SAMs): SAMs are extreme restrictions placed on prisoners deemed a significant threat to national security. These measures severely limit a prisoner's communication with the outside world, including restrictions on mail, visits, phone calls, and interaction with other inmates.Arguments by El Chapo's Defense:
Human Rights Violation: Guzmán's lawyers argue that the SAMs constitute cruel and unusual punishment, violating the Eighth Amendment. They contend that these restrictions lead to severe psychological harm and amount to inhumane treatment.Right to a Fair Trial: They argue that SAMs impede Guzmán's ability to participate in his own defense by limiting his communication with his legal team, potentially infringing on his Sixth Amendment rights.Arguments by the U.S. Government:
Security Concerns: The government maintains that SAMs are necessary due to Guzmán's history of orchestrating criminal activities from prison and his previous prison escapes. They argue that without these measures, Guzmán could continue to direct his drug cartel's operations, endangering public safety and national security.Preventing Witness Tampering: The restrictions are also seen as essential to prevent Guzmán from threatening or tampering with witnesses and obstructing justice.Court Rulings:
The courts have largely sided with the government, upholding the imposition of SAMs on Guzmán. Judges have ruled that the restrictions are justified given Guzmán's history and the potential risks he poses.Outcome: El Chapo was convicted in February 2019 on multiple charges, including drug trafficking, murder conspiracy, and money laundering. He was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years and is currently serving his sentence under SAMs at the ADX Florence supermax prison in Colorado.
(commercial at 8:13)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
032717-wls-el-chapo-SHU-doc.pdf (go.com) -
The court battle between Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán and the United States Government over Special Administrative Measures (SAMs) is centered around the stringent confinement conditions imposed on Guzmán after his extradition to the U.S. in 2017.Special Administrative Measures (SAMs): SAMs are extreme restrictions placed on prisoners deemed a significant threat to national security. These measures severely limit a prisoner's communication with the outside world, including restrictions on mail, visits, phone calls, and interaction with other inmates.Arguments by El Chapo's Defense:
Human Rights Violation: Guzmán's lawyers argue that the SAMs constitute cruel and unusual punishment, violating the Eighth Amendment. They contend that these restrictions lead to severe psychological harm and amount to inhumane treatment.Right to a Fair Trial: They argue that SAMs impede Guzmán's ability to participate in his own defense by limiting his communication with his legal team, potentially infringing on his Sixth Amendment rights.Arguments by the U.S. Government:
Security Concerns: The government maintains that SAMs are necessary due to Guzmán's history of orchestrating criminal activities from prison and his previous prison escapes. They argue that without these measures, Guzmán could continue to direct his drug cartel's operations, endangering public safety and national security.Preventing Witness Tampering: The restrictions are also seen as essential to prevent Guzmán from threatening or tampering with witnesses and obstructing justice.Court Rulings:
The courts have largely sided with the government, upholding the imposition of SAMs on Guzmán. Judges have ruled that the restrictions are justified given Guzmán's history and the potential risks he poses.Outcome: El Chapo was convicted in February 2019 on multiple charges, including drug trafficking, murder conspiracy, and money laundering. He was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years and is currently serving his sentence under SAMs at the ADX Florence supermax prison in Colorado.
(commercial at 8:13)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
032717-wls-el-chapo-SHU-doc.pdf (go.com) -
The court battle between Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán and the United States Government over Special Administrative Measures (SAMs) is centered around the stringent confinement conditions imposed on Guzmán after his extradition to the U.S. in 2017.Special Administrative Measures (SAMs): SAMs are extreme restrictions placed on prisoners deemed a significant threat to national security. These measures severely limit a prisoner's communication with the outside world, including restrictions on mail, visits, phone calls, and interaction with other inmates.Arguments by El Chapo's Defense:
Human Rights Violation: Guzmán's lawyers argue that the SAMs constitute cruel and unusual punishment, violating the Eighth Amendment. They contend that these restrictions lead to severe psychological harm and amount to inhumane treatment.Right to a Fair Trial: They argue that SAMs impede Guzmán's ability to participate in his own defense by limiting his communication with his legal team, potentially infringing on his Sixth Amendment rights.Arguments by the U.S. Government:
Security Concerns: The government maintains that SAMs are necessary due to Guzmán's history of orchestrating criminal activities from prison and his previous prison escapes. They argue that without these measures, Guzmán could continue to direct his drug cartel's operations, endangering public safety and national security.Preventing Witness Tampering: The restrictions are also seen as essential to prevent Guzmán from threatening or tampering with witnesses and obstructing justice.Court Rulings:
The courts have largely sided with the government, upholding the imposition of SAMs on Guzmán. Judges have ruled that the restrictions are justified given Guzmán's history and the potential risks he poses.Outcome: El Chapo was convicted in February 2019 on multiple charges, including drug trafficking, murder conspiracy, and money laundering. He was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years and is currently serving his sentence under SAMs at the ADX Florence supermax prison in Colorado.
(commercial at 10:14)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
032717-wls-el-chapo-SHU-doc.pdf (go.com) -
The court battle between Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán and the United States Government over Special Administrative Measures (SAMs) is centered around the stringent confinement conditions imposed on Guzmán after his extradition to the U.S. in 2017.Special Administrative Measures (SAMs): SAMs are extreme restrictions placed on prisoners deemed a significant threat to national security. These measures severely limit a prisoner's communication with the outside world, including restrictions on mail, visits, phone calls, and interaction with other inmates.Arguments by El Chapo's Defense:
Human Rights Violation: Guzmán's lawyers argue that the SAMs constitute cruel and unusual punishment, violating the Eighth Amendment. They contend that these restrictions lead to severe psychological harm and amount to inhumane treatment.Right to a Fair Trial: They argue that SAMs impede Guzmán's ability to participate in his own defense by limiting his communication with his legal team, potentially infringing on his Sixth Amendment rights.Arguments by the U.S. Government:
Security Concerns: The government maintains that SAMs are necessary due to Guzmán's history of orchestrating criminal activities from prison and his previous prison escapes. They argue that without these measures, Guzmán could continue to direct his drug cartel's operations, endangering public safety and national security.Preventing Witness Tampering: The restrictions are also seen as essential to prevent Guzmán from threatening or tampering with witnesses and obstructing justice.Court Rulings:
The courts have largely sided with the government, upholding the imposition of SAMs on Guzmán. Judges have ruled that the restrictions are justified given Guzmán's history and the potential risks he poses.Outcome: El Chapo was convicted in February 2019 on multiple charges, including drug trafficking, murder conspiracy, and money laundering. He was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years and is currently serving his sentence under SAMs at the ADX Florence supermax prison in Colorado.
(commercial at 8:52)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
032717-wls-el-chapo-SHU-doc.pdf (go.com) -
The trafficking of weapons meant for warzones often involves complex networks of arms dealers, corrupt officials, and organized crime groups. Here's a summary of how this process generally unfolds:Acquisition
Conflict Zones: Weapons are initially acquired from conflict zones, where they are often plentiful due to ongoing wars or civil unrest.Military Surplus: Arms dealers obtain surplus weapons from military stockpiles. These might be obsolete or excess to the needs of the armed forces.Black Market: Weapons can also be sourced from the black market, where they are sold illegally by corrupt military personnel or officials.Transportation
Smuggling Routes: Arms dealers use established smuggling routes to transport weapons. These routes often overlap with those used for drug trafficking.Bribes and Corruption: Bribes are paid to corrupt border officials, customs agents, and police to facilitate the smooth transit of weapons across borders.Disguised Shipments: Weapons are hidden in shipments of legal goods, such as food or machinery, to avoid detection.Distribution
Criminal Networks: Weapons are sold to organized crime groups, gangs, or other non-state actors. These groups use their existing distribution networks to move the weapons further.Drug Cartels: Arms dealers often trade weapons directly for drugs. This is particularly common in regions where drug cartels operate, as they have both the resources and the demand for firearms.Barter System: In some cases, weapons are bartered for other illicit goods or services, including drugs, making it a mutually beneficial exchange for both parties.Final Sale or Trade
End Users: The end users of these trafficked weapons can range from gang members and drug cartels to terrorist organizations and insurgent groups.Profit Generation: The sale or trade of weapons for drugs allows arms dealers to profit significantly, which they reinvest into further illegal activities.Market Dynamics: The illicit arms market is influenced by supply and demand. As conflicts flare up or as the need for drugs increases, the trafficking patterns and prices fluctuate accordingly.Impact
Violence and Instability: The influx of trafficked weapons exacerbates violence and instability in both conflict zones and areas plagued by drug-related crime.Enforcement Challenges: Law enforcement agencies face significant challenges in tracking and intercepting these illegal arms due to the sophisticated methods used by traffickers.
About a year ago we were having the discussion about MANPADS and other shoulder fired systems falling into the hands of the cartels and the legacy media was quick to deny it. Well, like usual, it would seem as if the legacy media wasn't exactly telling you the truth. So in this episode, we are going to swim through the muck and find some clarity.
(commercial at 12:59)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Mexican cartels boast of increased firepower, including U.S. weapons (usatoday.com) -
The Mexican cartels' trade of drugs for weapons is a complex and illicit network that involves the exchange of narcotics, primarily cocaine, marijuana, and methamphetamine, for firearms and ammunition. The process typically follows a multi-step pattern:
Drug Production: Mexican cartels have established extensive drug production and trafficking operations within the country. They cultivate and process drugs like marijuana and opium poppies, which are used to manufacture cocaine and heroin, respectively. Methamphetamine production has also increased significantly in recent years.Drug Transportation: Once the drugs are produced, cartels employ various methods to transport them across the border into the United States. These methods include the use of underground tunnels, hidden compartments in vehicles, boats, and even human couriers, known as "mules."Drug Distribution: In the United States, the Mexican cartels have established vast distribution networks, involving multiple tiers of individuals involved in the trade. These networks supply drugs to local gangs and distributors, who then distribute the narcotics further down the line.Accumulating Weapons: Cartels need weapons to protect their drug operations and maintain control over their territories. Firearms are acquired through various means, including purchases from arms dealers in Central America, illicit arms markets, and smuggling operations. Some weapons are also stolen from legitimate sources, such as law enforcement agencies or the military.Trade Negotiations: Mexican cartels establish connections with international arms dealers, intermediary groups, or corrupt individuals who can facilitate the trade of drugs for weapons. These negotiations may involve direct contact between cartel representatives and arms dealers, or they may rely on intermediaries to coordinate the exchange.Exchange Process: Once an agreement is reached, the trade takes place at a prearranged location. The cartels typically transport drugs to the designated location, where they hand over the narcotics to the arms dealers or intermediaries. In return, they receive weapons, ammunition, and other related equipment.Smuggling Weapons: After acquiring the weapons, the cartels smuggle them back into Mexico, often using similar methods employed for drug trafficking. These may include hidden compartments in vehicles, underground tunnels, or human couriers.Weapon Utilization: The acquired firearms are then used by the cartels for various purposes, including protection against rival cartels, confrontations with law enforcement agencies, and maintaining control over their illicit activities. The weapons also serve to intimidate and enforce their authority within the territories they operate.
In this episode, we examine the response by the AP to a story claiming that the cartels in Mexico have a pipeline to illegal arms, including ones earmarked for the theater in Ukraine. As usual, the fact checkers are well...not exactly factual.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Mistranslated news report sparks baseless claim about Mexican cartel getting weapon from Ukraine | AP News -
The trafficking of weapons meant for warzones often involves complex networks of arms dealers, corrupt officials, and organized crime groups. Here's a summary of how this process generally unfolds:Acquisition
Conflict Zones: Weapons are initially acquired from conflict zones, where they are often plentiful due to ongoing wars or civil unrest.Military Surplus: Arms dealers obtain surplus weapons from military stockpiles. These might be obsolete or excess to the needs of the armed forces.Black Market: Weapons can also be sourced from the black market, where they are sold illegally by corrupt military personnel or officials.Transportation
Smuggling Routes: Arms dealers use established smuggling routes to transport weapons. These routes often overlap with those used for drug trafficking.Bribes and Corruption: Bribes are paid to corrupt border officials, customs agents, and police to facilitate the smooth transit of weapons across borders.Disguised Shipments: Weapons are hidden in shipments of legal goods, such as food or machinery, to avoid detection.Distribution
Criminal Networks: Weapons are sold to organized crime groups, gangs, or other non-state actors. These groups use their existing distribution networks to move the weapons further.Drug Cartels: Arms dealers often trade weapons directly for drugs. This is particularly common in regions where drug cartels operate, as they have both the resources and the demand for firearms.Barter System: In some cases, weapons are bartered for other illicit goods or services, including drugs, making it a mutually beneficial exchange for both parties.Final Sale or Trade
End Users: The end users of these trafficked weapons can range from gang members and drug cartels to terrorist organizations and insurgent groups.Profit Generation: The sale or trade of weapons for drugs allows arms dealers to profit significantly, which they reinvest into further illegal activities.Market Dynamics: The illicit arms market is influenced by supply and demand. As conflicts flare up or as the need for drugs increases, the trafficking patterns and prices fluctuate accordingly.Impact
Violence and Instability: The influx of trafficked weapons exacerbates violence and instability in both conflict zones and areas plagued by drug-related crime.Enforcement Challenges: Law enforcement agencies face significant challenges in tracking and intercepting these illegal arms due to the sophisticated methods used by traffickers.
(commercial at 6:49)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Mexican cartels have begun using weapons smuggled from Ukraine (bulgarianmilitary.com) -
The Mexican cartels' trade of drugs for weapons is a complex and illicit network that involves the exchange of narcotics, primarily cocaine, marijuana, and methamphetamine, for firearms and ammunition. The process typically follows a multi-step pattern:
Drug Production: Mexican cartels have established extensive drug production and trafficking operations within the country. They cultivate and process drugs like marijuana and opium poppies, which are used to manufacture cocaine and heroin, respectively. Methamphetamine production has also increased significantly in recent years.Drug Transportation: Once the drugs are produced, cartels employ various methods to transport them across the border into the United States. These methods include the use of underground tunnels, hidden compartments in vehicles, boats, and even human couriers, known as "mules."Drug Distribution: In the United States, the Mexican cartels have established vast distribution networks, involving multiple tiers of individuals involved in the trade. These networks supply drugs to local gangs and distributors, who then distribute the narcotics further down the line.Accumulating Weapons: Cartels need weapons to protect their drug operations and maintain control over their territories. Firearms are acquired through various means, including purchases from arms dealers in Central America, illicit arms markets, and smuggling operations. Some weapons are also stolen from legitimate sources, such as law enforcement agencies or the military.Trade Negotiations: Mexican cartels establish connections with international arms dealers, intermediary groups, or corrupt individuals who can facilitate the trade of drugs for weapons. These negotiations may involve direct contact between cartel representatives and arms dealers, or they may rely on intermediaries to coordinate the exchange.Exchange Process: Once an agreement is reached, the trade takes place at a prearranged location. The cartels typically transport drugs to the designated location, where they hand over the narcotics to the arms dealers or intermediaries. In return, they receive weapons, ammunition, and other related equipment.Smuggling Weapons: After acquiring the weapons, the cartels smuggle them back into Mexico, often using similar methods employed for drug trafficking. These may include hidden compartments in vehicles, underground tunnels, or human couriers.Weapon Utilization: The acquired firearms are then used by the cartels for various purposes, including protection against rival cartels, confrontations with law enforcement agencies, and maintaining control over their illicit activities. The weapons also serve to intimidate and enforce their authority within the territories they operate.
In this episode, we discuss the disputed report about a member of the Gulf Cartel being in posession of a anti tank weapon that is being used in Ukraine. The weapon, first reported as a Javelin system, was confirmed to be an AT-4, a different style of anti tank gun that fires grenades.
(commercial at 7:55)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
US 'Javelin' misses mark: Anti-tank missile meant for Ukraine lands up with Mexican gangster (firstpost.com) -
As the western world continues to pour weapons into Ukraine to help the people of the nation defend their sovereignty American intelligence officials are admitting that they have no idea where the weapons end up once they enter the theater.
With the high level of technology that is being deployed, it is inevitable that criminal groups will be vying to get their hands on some of it to cause maximum damage to their enemies and anyone else who stands in their way.
(commercial at 15:13)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/04/19/politics/us-weapons-ukraine-intelligence/index.html -
Narcotrafficking submarines, also known as drug submarines or narco-submarines, are specialized watercraft used by drug cartels and criminal organizations to transport illegal drugs across bodies of water, primarily for the purpose of smuggling drugs into other countries. These submarines have become a significant concern for law enforcement and maritime authorities due to their ability to avoid detection and efficiently move large quantities of narcotics.
Purpose: Narcotrafficking submarines are designed and used to smuggle illegal drugs, such as cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin, across international waters. They allow drug cartels to move their products covertly and evade traditional law enforcement measures.Design and construction: These submarines are custom-built, semi-submersible, or fully-submersible vessels. Some are capable of diving partially underwater, while others can fully submerge for short periods to avoid detection by radar and surveillance systems.Submersible technology: The submarines are equipped with advanced navigation systems, periscopes, and communication equipment to navigate long distances and avoid detection by authorities. They are often constructed using fiberglass and other materials that make them difficult to detect by radar and sonar.Crew: Typically, these vessels have a small crew, ranging from a few individuals to a handful. These crew members are skilled and trained to operate the submarine and navigate through challenging maritime environments.Trafficking routes: Narcotrafficking submarines are primarily used to transport drugs from producing countries in South America, such as Colombia, to consumer markets in North America, like the United States. They often travel through the Pacific or Atlantic Ocean, and their routes may vary to avoid detection.Detection challenges: Due to their low profile and ability to operate stealthily, detecting and intercepting narcotrafficking submarines are challenging for law enforcement agencies. However, efforts have been made to improve surveillance and interdiction strategies to combat this type of drug smuggling.Legal implications: Operating and using narcotrafficking submarines is illegal under international law and the laws of most countries. Those involved in manufacturing, operating, or transporting drugs through these vessels can face severe legal consequences if caught.
With the assistance of highly trained and skilled engineers from Pakistan, the cartels are now pumping out more sophisticated subs than ever, making an already difficult job that much harder.
(commercial at 9:12)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Narco Submarines: How Pakistan is helping Colombian drug cartels sneak in cocaine into US (firstpost.com) -
Diddy has fired back at Joi Dickerson Neal and her allegations against him and in this episode, we are going to get a look at what Diddy had to say.
A "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" is a legal document filed by defendants in a lawsuit. Let's break down what each component means:
Memorandum of Law: This is a written legal document that presents arguments and supporting authorities (such as statutes, regulations, and case law) in support of a specific legal position. It is used to persuade the court to rule in favor of the party presenting the memorandum.Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss: A motion to dismiss is a request made by one party in a lawsuit to terminate the case before it goes to trial. In this case, the defendants are asking the court to dismiss only certain parts of the complaint filed against them. This motion is "partial" because it seeks dismissal of only some claims or allegations, rather than the entire complaint.The Complaint: This refers to the initial document filed by the plaintiff(s) in a lawsuit, which outlines the claims and allegations against the defendant(s). The defendants' motion to dismiss is a response to the complaint, arguing that some or all of the claims in the complaint should be dismissed for various reasons, such as failure to state a legal claim, lack of jurisdiction, or other deficiencies in the complaint.So, the "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" would be a document prepared by the defendants' legal team that lays out the legal arguments and authorities supporting their request to dismiss certain parts of the complaint. It would likely include analysis of relevant case law, statutes, and legal principles to demonstrate why the court should grant their motion to dismiss.
(commercial at 10:34)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
diddy-motion.pdf (documentcloud.org) -
Diddy has fired back at Joi Dickerson Neal and her allegations against him and in this episode, we are going to get a look at what Diddy had to say.
A "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" is a legal document filed by defendants in a lawsuit. Let's break down what each component means:
Memorandum of Law: This is a written legal document that presents arguments and supporting authorities (such as statutes, regulations, and case law) in support of a specific legal position. It is used to persuade the court to rule in favor of the party presenting the memorandum.Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss: A motion to dismiss is a request made by one party in a lawsuit to terminate the case before it goes to trial. In this case, the defendants are asking the court to dismiss only certain parts of the complaint filed against them. This motion is "partial" because it seeks dismissal of only some claims or allegations, rather than the entire complaint.The Complaint: This refers to the initial document filed by the plaintiff(s) in a lawsuit, which outlines the claims and allegations against the defendant(s). The defendants' motion to dismiss is a response to the complaint, arguing that some or all of the claims in the complaint should be dismissed for various reasons, such as failure to state a legal claim, lack of jurisdiction, or other deficiencies in the complaint.So, the "Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint" would be a document prepared by the defendants' legal team that lays out the legal arguments and authorities supporting their request to dismiss certain parts of the complaint. It would likely include analysis of relevant case law, statutes, and legal principles to demonstrate why the court should grant their motion to dismiss.
(commercial at 10:34)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
diddy-motion.pdf (documentcloud.org) -
Our examination of the allegations made against Diddy continues in this episode, as we begin taking a look at the complaint filed by Joi Dickerson-Neal.
(commercial at 10:02)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
sexual assault lawsuit against Diddy - DocumentCloud -
Our examination of the allegations made against Diddy continues in this episode, as we begin taking a look at the complaint filed by Joi Dickerson-Neal.
(commercial at 7:44)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
sexual assault lawsuit against Diddy - DocumentCloud - Show more
