Episodit
-
China's resilience: Turning tariffs into driving force
First Voice
A new chapter in global trade tensions is unfolding with U.S. President Donald Trump's latest move: A sweeping 10 percent additional tax on Chinese imports, igniting economic friction that's rippling far beyond Washington and Beijing. But this isn't just a story of tariffs and taxes; it's a test of resilience, strategy and global influence. How has China responded? In this video commentary, Yasir Masood, CGTN opinion editor and Pakistani political commentator, unpacks the big picture: Past, present and future.
https://news.cgtn.com/news/2025-02-07/China-s-resilience-Turning-tariffs-into-driving-force-1ANCxadK8UM/p.html
Long Mekong is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Japan PM, Trump play nice despite tariff threat
Source: France 24
Heaping praise on each other at the White House, the two leaders pledged to stand together against Chinese "aggression" and said they found a solution for a blocked deal for troubled US Steel.
Trump however pressed Ishiba to cut the US trade deficit with Japan to zero, and warned that Tokyo could still face tariffs on exported goods if it fails to do so.
Ishiba, an avowed "geek" and model warship fan, has been under pressure to replicate Trump's close relationship with former premier and golf buddy Shinzo Abe.
Both leaders insisted they had struck up a rapport during what was only the second visit by a foreign leader of Trump's new term.
'Frightening'?
"I was so excited to see such a celebrity on television in person," Ishiba told their joint press conference -- while saying he was not trying to "suck up."
"On television he is frightening and has a very strong personality. But when I met with him actually he was very sincere and very powerful."
As they exchanged photographs, Trump praised the 68-year-old Japanese premier as "good looking" -- typically one of the former reality TV star's highest orders of praise.
And the US president laughed and said "that's a very good answer" when Ishiba said he could not respond to a "theoretical question" about whether he would retaliate to any US tariffs.
Trump meanwhile said that Japan's Nippon Steel will make a major investment in US Steel, but not take over the troubled company as previously negotiated.
Trump said "they'll be looking at an investment rather than a purchase." His predecessor Joe Biden had blocked the deal.
The two leaders also doubled down on decades-old US ties in security and trade -- despite fears that Trump could turn on Tokyo as he has with other US allies.
Chinese 'aggression'?
Trump said they had agreed to fight "Chinese economic aggression" and in a joint statement they condemned Beijing for "provocative activities" in the contested South China Sea.
They also called for a denuclearised North Korea, although Trump -- who met its leader Kim Jong-un during his first term -- said he wanted to have "relations" with Pyongyang.
Behind Trump's expressions of support were Japan's promises of a 1 trillion dollar investment in the United States and to boost Japanese purchases of US defense equipment.
Ishiba said his country was the biggest investor in the United States and would step up its spending.
The soft-spoken, cigarette-smoking Ishiba had rushed to Washington hoping to blunt the edge of Trump's "America First" policies.
Under Abe, Japan was shielded from some of Trump's more punishing tendencies, such as sudden trade wars and pressure to increase financial contributions towards hosting US soldiers.
Days after Trump's first election victory, Abe rushed to deliver to him a gold-plated golf club. Trump also hosted Abe's widow Akie for dinner at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida this past December.
So far the US president has slapped tariffs on China and ordered them on Mexico and Canada before halting them for a month.
He has also pledged tariffs on the European Union and said Friday that he would announce unspecified "reciprocal tariffs" next week.
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250207-trump-hosts-japan-pm-threatens-tariffs
Full-Page Ad: Donald Trump - Letter on Foreign Policy - September 2, 1987
How Japan sparked Trump's 40-year love affair with tariffs
By Nada Tawfik
When Donald Trump's fortunes took a downturn in the 90s and he needed to raise cash fast, he sailed his 282ft (85m) super-yacht, the Trump Princess, to Asia hoping he could attract Japan's wealthy.
It wasn't the first time the businessman had sought out Japanese buyers or lenders for his projects.
In the cut-throat world of New York real estate, Trump had a front-row seat from his Fifth Avenue skyscraper of Tokyo's buying spree in the 80s of iconic US brands and properties, including Rockefeller Center.
It was then that his worldview on trade and America's relations with its allies was formed, and his fixation on tariffs, a tax on imports, began.
"He had a tremendous resentment for Japan," says Barbara Res, a former executive vice-president at the Trump Organization.
He watched with jealousy as Japanese businessmen were viewed as geniuses, she says. He felt America wasn't getting enough in return for assisting its ally Japan with military defence.
* What are tariffs and why is Trump threatening them?
Trump often complained that he had difficulties doing deals with large groups of Japanese businessmen.
"I'm tired of watching other countries ripping off the United States."
That Trump quote could've been pulled from 2016, but it's actually from the late 80s when he made an appearance on CNN's Larry King Live, around the time he first floated his name as a potential presidential candidate.
Fresh from sharing his business philosophy in his 1987 book, The Art of the Deal, Trump went on a tirade against America's trade policies in national interviews.
In an animated interview with Oprah Winfrey before a live studio audience on The Oprah Show, he said he would handle foreign policy differently by making the country's allies "pay their fair share".
He added that there wasn't free trade when Japan was "dumping" products into America's market but making it "impossible to do business" there.
Jennifer Miller, an associate professor of history at Dartmouth College, said others shared his concerns about the economy at the time.
Japan provided competition for US manufacturing, particularly in consumer electronics and cars. As US factories were shuttering and new Japanese brands entered the market, pundits were talking about Japan surpassing the US as the world's leading economy.
"Trump is sort of symbolic of a lot of people who were kind of questioning American leadership in the American-led international order, and whether it actually served the United States," Prof Miller says.
Before his Oprah appearance, Trump had spent almost $100,000 to release an "open letter" in full-page ads in three major US newspapers.
The headline read: "There's nothing wrong with America's Foreign Defense Policy that a little backbone can't cure."
In it, he said Japan and other nations had been taking advantage of the US for decades. He claimed "the Japanese, unimpeded by the huge costs of defending themselves (as long as the United States will do it for free), have built a strong and vibrant economy with unprecedented surpluses".
Trump believed the obvious solution was to "tax" these wealthy nations.
"The world is laughing at America's politicians as we protect ships we don't own, carrying oil we don't need, destined for allies who won't help," he wrote.
Watch: Donald Trump opens up in 1998 BBC interview on surviving financial loss
The ad served as a potent introduction to Trump's foreign policy vision, according to Prof Miller. One built on the zero-sum belief that allies are freeloaders and that the liberal internationalist approach which had dominated since World War II was weak and foolish in a competitive world. The solution, he argued, was a more aggressive, protectionist trade policy.
"I think that's one reason he likes tariffs so much, is they fit not only with his transactional ideology but his sense of himself, which is very deeply rooted as this successful dealmaker," she said. "And the fact that tariffs can be threatened; they can be dangled over another country."
Clyde Prestowitz headed negotiations with Japan during the Reagan administration as counselor to the secretary of commerce. A longtime critic of free-trade policies, he said nobody who was intellectually serious was affiliated with Trump or his simplistic approach at the time. He argues that the president hasn't offered a real solution to the problems he's raised.
"Tariffs are kind of a showy thing that you can say, look what I did, I banged those guys… so you know, you can be a tough guy. Whether or not they are effective in any way is really open to discussion."
Mr Prestowitz believes the real problem then and now is that the US doesn't have a strategic manufacturing policy, despite complaining about unfair trade.
Of course, fears of Japan's rise calmed over time and now it's an ally. Instead it's China that is the US's fiercest corporate competitor. This week Trump welcomed Japan's prime minster into the Oval Office as one of his first foreign visitors.
But Donald Trump's governing philosophy is still the same as when he was a young real estate developer. He still believes just as strongly in tariffs as a tool to pressure other countries to open their markets and reduce trade deficits.
"He just says this all the time to anybody who will listen whenever anybody asks, and that's been true for 40 years. And in fairness to him, you know that is a very natural way to view international commerce," said Michael Strain, an economist with the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
He says students often share Trump's intuitive thinking about the economy, and one of the big challenges that professors face is convincing them that their understanding is wrong.
Mr Strain says despite Trump's hold on the party, with a stance that has upended decades of Republican embrace of free trade, he doesn't think he's convinced sceptical lawmakers, business leaders and economists.
The sticking points remain that his views that foreign imports are bad, that the size of the trade deficit is a useful measure of policy success or that the ideal state for the US economy is to only import goods that cannot physically be made in the US.
Mr Strain believes threats to increase tariffs on US allies could reduce business investment and weaken international alliances.
Joseph LaVorgna, a chief economist of the National Economic Council during Trump's first term, believes there's been too narrow a focus on tariffs and not enough of an attempt to understand the big picture of what Trump is trying to accomplish.
He says the president wants to galvanise domestic industry, in particular high-tech manufacturing.
The administration, he explains, feels they can encourage more corporations to come to the US using tariffs, combined with deregulation, cheaper energy and lower corporate taxes, if enacted by Congress.
"I think that President Trump understands something which is very important, being a businessman and being transactional, and that is free trade is great in theory but in the real world you need to have fair trade and that's a level playing field."
He is betting Donald Trump is right. Few Republicans have publicly opposed the president as he demands loyalty to his agenda.
Still, some who have remained silent understand that their constituents could be impacted by rising prices, and are hoping they can convince Trump not to follow through with his beloved tariffs.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gp5pw654lo
Get full access to Long Mekong at longmekong.substack.com/subscribe -
A Journey Through Chinese Fine Arts
History, Periods, Materials, and Masterpieces
Source: https://chat.deepseek.com (prompt: write a 500 word essay on the development of ink drawing in China and emphasis the importance of the horse and especially at scale or in Tang statuary. Also add mention of Shang and sites in Sichuan)
The development of ink drawing in China is a profound reflection of the country's rich cultural and artistic heritage, spanning thousands of years. Ink drawing, or *shuimohua*, emerged as a dominant artistic medium during the Tang Dynasty (618–907 CE), though its roots can be traced back to earlier periods, including the Shang Dynasty (c. 1600–1046 BCE). This art form, characterized by its use of brush, ink, and paper or silk, became a vehicle for expressing philosophical ideas, natural beauty, and the dynamism of life. Among its many subjects, the horse holds a special place, symbolizing power, freedom, and spiritual vitality. The depiction of horses in ink drawing and Tang statuary, often at a monumental scale, exemplifies the artistic and cultural significance of this subject.
The origins of Chinese ink drawing can be linked to the Shang Dynasty, where early forms of calligraphy and symbolic art were inscribed on oracle bones and bronze vessels. These early works laid the groundwork for the expressive potential of brush and ink. By the Tang Dynasty, ink drawing had matured into a sophisticated art form, influenced by Daoist and Buddhist philosophies that emphasized harmony with nature and the fluidity of life. Artists such as Wu Daozi and Han Gan elevated ink drawing to new heights, capturing the essence of their subjects with minimal yet powerful strokes. Han Gan, in particular, was renowned for his depictions of horses, which were celebrated for their lifelike energy and movement. His works, such as *Night-Shining White*, exemplify the Tang Dynasty's fascination with the horse as a symbol of imperial power and cosmic vitality.
Long Mekong is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The horse was not only a central subject in ink drawing but also a prominent motif in Tang statuary. Tang Dynasty pottery figurines, often created as tomb goods, frequently depicted horses at a large scale, reflecting their importance in both daily life and the afterlife. These sculptures, known for their realism and dynamism, captured the horse's muscular form and spirited demeanor. The scale of these statues, sometimes life-sized, underscored the horse's symbolic role as a bridge between the earthly and spiritual realms. The Tang elite, who prized horses for their role in warfare, trade, and diplomacy, commissioned such works to demonstrate their status and ensure their prosperity in the afterlife.
In addition to the Tang Dynasty's artistic achievements, archaeological discoveries in Sichuan Province have shed light on earlier depictions of horses and other animals. Sites such as Sanxingdui, dating back to the Shang and Zhou periods, reveal a rich tradition of animal symbolism in Chinese art. While these artifacts are primarily bronze and jade rather than ink drawings, they demonstrate the enduring cultural significance of animals, including horses, in Chinese artistic expression.
In conclusion, the development of ink drawing in China, particularly during the Tang Dynasty, represents a pinnacle of artistic achievement. The horse, as a subject, embodies the vitality and spirit of the era, whether rendered in ink on silk or sculpted at a monumental scale. From the Shang Dynasty's symbolic art to the grandeur of Tang statuary, the horse has remained a powerful motif, reflecting China's deep connection to nature, spirituality, and artistic innovation.
* https://www.patreon.com/c/TheChair844
* https://x.com/GalaLive8/
* https://www.linkedin.com/in/dgb365/
Get full access to Long Mekong at longmekong.substack.com/subscribe -
Puuttuva jakso?
-
The Biden neo-cons are attempting to trap Trump in sanctions, weapons and loans to Gaza and Ukraine. A deep dive into the implications for G7 leaders as they drop like flies from the political fallout.
The rapid turnover of G7 leaders has become a farce. Economic turmoil, a major change in global industrial investment and a river of US sanctions and the Team Trump tariff avalanche expected this year provide the bulk of today’s episode.
A quick update on ASEAN and Cambodia FDI and the outlook for Trump tariffs on the world’s largest trade partnership between China and ASEAN.
Australia’s sustainability transition is highly dependent on China’s EVs, but so is the UK and many are countries.
Like, subscribe and share…
https://www.patreon.com/c/TheChair844
https://x.com/DGB365/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dgb365/
https://www.youtube.com/@long_mekong
Get full access to Long Mekong at longmekong.substack.com/subscribe -
NATO is boosting its visibility in the Asia Pacific region. For three years in a row, leaders or representatives of four Asia Pacific countries – Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand – have attended the annual summit of the military alliance. The outgoing NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has been an ardent advocator of Asia Pacific outreach, and his argument has been echoed by US officials as Washington, DC hosted this year’s NATO summit.What is behind NATO’s growing interest in Asia Pacific? Will NATO be a force for good if it establishes a sizeable footprint in the region? Host Ding Heng is joined by Digby James Wren, External Relations Advisor to the Royal Academy of Cambodia; Lee Pei May, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the International Islamic University Malaysia; Professor Shen Dingli from the Institute of International Studies, Fudan University.
Listen to original here.
Transcript below.
Long Mekong is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Long Mekong at longmekong.substack.com/subscribe -
Good morning,
Today is Wednesday the 10th of July 2024 and today we're going to explore the NATO Summit that's being held in Washington today and tomorrow. And, I think we're going to start with an article written by the the former Singapore ambassador to the United Nations, Kishore Mahbubani, who was actually appointed twice as Singapore’s UN ambassador.
Now, he's a very, very well-respected figure, and he wrote in 2021 that...
“that the Pacific has no need of the destructive militaristic culture of the Atlantic Alliance.”
Now, what was he talking about?
What he was talking about was the fact that NATO, which has existed since post-World War II and the Cold War era, basically has been involved in invasions and wars in Europe, in the Middle East, Central Asia, North Africa and other places.
And now the United States wants NATO to be dragged in to Asia.
Long Mekong is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to Long Mekong at longmekong.substack.com/subscribe
