Episodit

  • US Special Operations Command, or SOCOM, is divided up into the following. I will talk about each individual unit listed.
    Army: 75th Ranger Regiment, Special Forces (Green Berets), 160th SOAR (Night Stalkers)
    Navy: SEALs, and SWCCs (Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen)Air Force: Pararescuemen (PJs), Combat Controllers (CCTs)Marine Corps: Marine Force ReconJoint: Delta Force, DEVGRU, 24th Special Tactics Squadron, Intelligence Support ActivityFor more information, read:
    US Special Forces by Samuel Southworth
    Chosen Soldier by Dick Couch
    That Others May Live by Jack Brehm
    Lone Survivor by Marcus Luttrell
    Black Hawk Down by Mark Bowden

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Audible (visit audiblepodcast.com/militaryhistory for a free audiobook download)


  • This episode answers four basic questions:
    Why were both North and South so unprepared for war?Which side had the initial advantage?Did the South have to secede? Did the North have to respond with military force?Was Northern victory inevitable?For information on sources, email me.

  • Puuttuva jakso?

    Paina tästä ja päivitä feedi.

  • Vicksburg was a Confederate fortress guarding the Mississippi River during the American Civil War. It was the only thing stopping the Union from taking control of the all-powerful Mississippi waterway. Although the Vicksburg Campaign is most famously associated with General Ulysses Grant (whose capture of the fortress is considered a major turning point in the war), there were many earlier Union campaigns to take control of Vicksburg. One of these campaigns, led by Navy Admiral David Farragut, is the focus of this episode.

    The script for this episode was written by Jacob Bains from Texas. If you would like to submit your own script, please send it to [email protected]

  • Why has democracy failed in Iraq? Here are some potential theories, with their originators in parentheses:
    Modernization (Rostow, Lipset): Iraq is not wealthy, urban,modern, or secular enough to support democracy. It has not followedthe same path to development that Western democracies have set out, andthus, it is not yet ready.Cultural (Huntington, Weber): Iraqis are not inherently suitablefor democracy, simply because their culture favors an authoritarianstyle of government.Marxist (Moore, Marx): Iraq still has a strong landed elite and aweak bourgeoisie, meaning that it is not ripe for class conflict andthus, it is not ripe for social and political developmentVoluntarist (Di Palma): Iraq lacks the strong leadership needed to usher the country into a democratic phase.Each of these theories has its flaws and counterexamples, which will bediscussed in this episode. This is not meant to define one theory asbetter than the rest...it is simply meant to put all ideas on the table.

    For more information, read:
    Huntington's Third Wave
    Di Palma's To Craft Democracies
    Bellin's Authoritarianism in the Middle East
    Colton's Putin and Democratization
    Johnson's Political Institutions and Economic Performance
    Lipset's Political Man
    Marx's Communist Manifesto
    Moore's Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy
    Rostow's Stages of Economic Growth
    Selbin's Revolution in the Real World
    Skocpol's Social Revolutions in the Modern World
    Varshney's India Defies the Odds
    Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

  • This episode focuses on the decision-making strategies that PresidentBush used in December of 2006 before choosing to commit the troopsurge. Things discussed include: the release of the Iraq Study GroupReport, the 2006 midterm elections, Bush's meeting with Generals Keaneand Downing, and Bush's relationship with General Petraeus andSecretary Gates. At the end of the episode is a recap on the successof the troop surge, as well as an analysis of President Bush'sleadership during December 2006 and January 2007.

    For more background information on Iraq, listen to: Iraq Study GroupReport Assessment, Iraq Study Group Report Recommendations, InvadingIraq, Occupying Iraq, Iraq's Environment, and Medal of Honor in Iraq.

  • Whether they are seen as acts of God, or as simple climate-relatedoccurrences, natural events have always had a sizeable impact onmilitary operations. At the small end of the scale are the little changes in terrain or weather that may affect a battle or a small war. Forexample, many armies have postponed their campaigns due to inclementweather conditions, and many militaries have suffered from rampantdisease. On the other end of the scale are thetimes when nature has so much of an impact that the fate of an entirenation or civilization is decided upon it. Inthe words of Charles Darwin, these are times when “the war of nature”results in the downfall of one party and the rise of another.
    Colonization Smallpox: Rampant disease severely weakened theAztecs and Incas, allowing small bands of Spanish conquistadors (led byCortez and Pizarro, respectively) to easily overthrow two great empires.Revolutionary Wind and Fog: Heavy winds subsided after the Battleof Long Island, allowing American troops to evacuate and fight anotherday. Their retreat was concealed by a dense fog. Later, just beforethe Battle of Trenton, a heavy fog concealed the Americans long enoughto conduct a surprise attack which greatly boosted the morale of theContinental Army.Russian Winter: Cold temperatures forced Napoleon to retreatafter he failed to conquer Russia and find accommodations in Moscow. The lack of grass and unfrozen roads resulted in the destruction of upto 75% of Napoleon's Army as it marched back to France.For more information, read:
    Hopkins' The Great Killer
    Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel
    McCullough's 1776
    Burton's Napoleon's Invasion of Russia
    Tolstoy's War and Peace
    George's Napoleon's Invasion of Russia

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine

  • Whether they are seen as acts of God, or as simple climate-relatedoccurrences, natural events have always had a sizeable impact on militaryoperations. At the small end of thescale are the little changes in terrain or weather that may affect a battle ora small war. For example, many armieshave postponed their campaigns due to inclement weather conditions, and manymilitaries have suffered from rampant disease. On the other end of the scale are the times when nature has so much ofan impact that the fate of an entire nation or civilization is decided uponit. In the words of Charles Darwin,these are times when “the war of nature? results in the downfall of one partyand the rise of another.

    Thales' Eclipse: Halted the epic Battle of Halys River, therebysaving one or both of the participants (Lydia and Media) fromdestruction.Kamikaze (Divine Wind): Created a storm that destroying the invading Mongol fleets, thereby saving Japan from foreign conquest.Athenian Typhoid: Wreaked havoc throughout Athens, contributing to its downfall in the Peloponnesian War.Bering Land Bridge: Facilitated the "invasion" of North America.Clouds over Kokura: Obscured the primary target for the "Fat Man"atomic bomb, thereby saving Kokura but resulting in the destruction ofNagasaki.Legend of Quetzacoatl: Convinced the Aztecs that Cortez was thereincarnation of Quetzacoatl, thereby facilitating the Spanish conquestof Latin America.For more information, read:
    Darwin's Origin of Species
    Herodotus' Histories
    Mitchell's Eclipses of the Sun
    Lamont-Brown's Kamikaze
    Daniels' Almanac of World History

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine
  • This episode covers the period between Bush's declaration of "MissionAccomplished" and the change in coalition leadership (from GeneralCasey to General Petraeus). The following major events and topics arediscussed:

    2003: Deaths of Saddam's two sons (Qusay and Uday), capture ofSaddam, Baathist Purge, National Museum looting, and Bremer'sdisbanding of the Iraqi Army.2004: Sectarian violence and displacement, Operation VigiliantResolve (1st Fallujah), Battle of Ramadi, Battle of Husaybah, Battle ofMosul, Operation Phanton Fury (2nd Fallujah), Blackwater USA, medals ofhonor.2005: January and December Legislative Elections, Battle of Haditha, Abu Ghraib.2006: Handing three provinces to Iraqi authority, death ofZarqawi, execution of Saddam, Al-Askari mosque bombing, OperationTogether Forward (Baghdad), Battle of Ramadi.2007: Battle of Haifa Street (Baghdad), creation of the new Counterinsurgency Field Manual (3-24).For more information, read:
    Iraq Study Group Report
    Counterinsurgency Field Manual 3-24
    No End in Sight (film)
    http://iraq.liveleak.com/
    www.iraqstatusreport.com
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFijzDyJnVE
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epfmuHr4_b8&feature=related
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGQaPYzFZ8o

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine

  • According to Lawrence Keeley, "90-95% of known societies engage inwar". Why? What compels homo sapiens to kill each other? Why do wefight? Part one will describe two hypotheses.

    War is Necessary:
    Aristotlesays in Nicomachean Ethics that "we fight war so that we may live inpeace". This notion is echoed by many other famous thinkers includingMarx (an advocate of a final proletarian revolution in order toestablish a worker's paradise) and Zoroaster (the first monotheist todiscuss the final battle of judgment between good and evil).

    War is Logical:
    UsingDarwin's logic, mankind continues to fight wars because it is the meansthrough which our species survives. Thomas Malthus adapted this into apopulation argument, stating that humans fight wars in order to keeppopulations small and manageable. Samuel Huntington took this one stepfurther by saying that war negates massive youth bulges. Lastly, JohnNash (the economist) proved, through game theory, that war is a morelogical choice than peace.

    War is Accidental:
    AJP Taylorargued that all wars are unintended and unhappy escalations of smallerconflicts. Warmongering is neither inherent nor unavoidable. Taylor'sideas link closely to the pacifistic ideas of Tolstoy and Gandhi.

    For more information, read:
    Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle
    Communist Manifesto by Marx
    Holy Avesta, Holy Bible, Holy Qur'an
    Origin of Species by Darwin
    An Essay on the Principle of Population by Malthus
    Environmental Science by Richard Wright
    Clash of Civilizations by Samuel Huntington

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine

  • According to Lawrence Keeley, "90-95% of known societies engage inwar". Why? What compels homo sapiens to kill each other? Why do wefight? Part one will describe two hypotheses.

    War is Rational:
    SunTzu argued that political struggles would eventually lead to armedconflict. Clausewitz took this one step further by saying that "war isa mere continuation of policy by other means". Machiavelli completedthis entire line of thought by saying that war was the most efficientmeans of attaining any political goal.

    War is Inevitable:
    Hobbesargued that humans are inherently violent. Raymond Dart and RobertArdrey found a scientific basis for this by claiming that homo sapiensbecame the dominant humanoid through their martial prowess (and we havekept this prowess ever since). Another group of philosophers believethat war can be attributed to the reckless aggression caused bytestosterone in males.

    For more information, read:
    Sun Tzu's Art of War
    Clausewitz's On War
    Machiavelli's The Prince
    Mao's Quotations
    Hobbes' Leviathan

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine

  • Joan of Arc (1412-1431) was a poor peasant girl fromLorraine. One day, she had a vision in which three saints urged her tolead the French to victory over the English in the Hundred Years' War.She traveled to Charles VII's court and was appointed head of theFrench Army (headed to relieve the besieged city of Orleans) becauseher unlikely presence would inspire hope in the French forces. Uponarriving in Orleans, Joan launched several counterattacks against theEnglish and broke the siege in only eight days. Then, she led acampaign to clear the English out of the Loire River Valley, eventuallyliberating the city of Reims.

    During a later skirmish, Joan was captured and tried for heresy. Shewas found guilty and burned at the stake. Later, she was exonerated andmade a saint. She has served a symbol of French nationalism andfeminist pride ever since.

    For more information, read:.
    Joan of Arc: Her Story by Regine PeroudJoan of Arc: A Military Appreciation by Stephen Richey

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine and Audible

  • Frederick the Great, King of Prussia, is considered the best commanderof the European Enlightenment. Despite possessing relatively fewpeople and resources, he transformed the tiny Prussian state into agreat military power (which arguably wouldn't be brought down until1945). Strategically, he modernized the Prussian military into awell-trained, well-disciplined unit. He taught them to fire faster,march with more precision, and deploy artillery quicker. Tactically,he employed oblique tactics which massed all units on one side of thebattle line in order to sweep through the enemy forces one at a time(instead of all at once). This allowed Frederick to achieve victoriesagainst numerically-superior enemies at Hohenfriedberg, Rossbach, andLeuthen.

    For more information, read:
    Frederickthe Great by Gerhard Ritter
    Frederickthe Great by Giles MacDonogh
    Frederickthe Great by Christopher Duffy
    Military Blunders by Geoffrey Regan
    Dictionary of Battles by David Chandler
    Extreme War by Terrence Poulos

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine

  • President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, asouthern sympathizer and a self-proclaimed modern-day Brutus, on April14th, 1865 (five days after the end of the Civil War). Booth snuck intoLincoln's viewing Booth at the Ford's Theater while Lincoln waswatching "Our American Cousin" and shot him in the back of the head.Booth then jumped down onto the stage and ran out the back door. Theensuing manhunt eventually caught up with him in the swamps of thePotomac River. He was shot, and his co-conspirators were hanged.

    The event has many interesting stories associated with it:
    Lincolnhad a dream in which he walked into the East Room of the White Houseand saw a casket. He asked the soldiers why there was a casket and thesoldiers told him that the President had been assassinated. He had thedream three days before being assassinated.Robert ToddLincoln, Abraham Lincoln's son, stood by his father's body as he passedaway. Strangely, Robert Todd Lincoln would also stand by the sides ofPresidents Garfield and McKinley (both shot by assassins) as they laydying.Robert Todd Lincoln once fell onto the train tracks but was saved by Edwin Booth, John's brother.Boston Corbett, the soldier who fatally wounded Booth, shot him in the exact same spot that Booth shot Lincoln.There are also several conspiracy theories about the Lincoln Assassination:
    VicePresident Johnson indirectly communicated with Booth on the day of theassassination. He stood to gain the most from the death of Lincoln.ConfederateSecretary of State Judah Benjamin might have ordered the assassinationof the opposing head of state for tactical reasons. Benjamin destroyedall of his records after the surrender, and then fled to England andnever returned.Secretary of War Edwin Stanton disliked Lincolnfor his moderate stance on many issues. Stanton prevented Ulysses Grant(and his military escort) from attending "Our American Cousin" withLincoln (and potentially saving his life). He also lowered security onthe bridge that Booth used to flee into Maryland. He also destroyed afew pages of Booth's diary before it was used as evidence in court.For more information, read:
    The American Presidents by David Whitney
    Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln’s Killer (The History Channel)
    The Greatest Presidential Stories Never Told by Rick Beyer

  • Crassus was the wealthiest man in Rome. Before he joined the FirstTriumvirate with Pompey and Caesar, he struggled to make a name forhimself. His big break came with the outbreak of the Third ServileWar, when Spartacus led a slave rebellion throughout the ItalianPeninsula. Spartacus and his men wreaked havoc throughout the region,defeating several Roman legions. Although his original plan was toescape to Gaul and head home, Spartacus decided to head south towardsSicily. However, his transport (the Cilician Pirates) failed to arrivein time, and Crassus was able to bring his legions in from behind totrap Spartacus. In the ensuing battle, Spartacus was killed and manymore slaves were crucified. Crassus achieved some fame but in the end,his career would pale in comparison to Pompey and Caesar. He waskilled in Parthia after a failed showing at the Battle of Carrhae byhaving molten gold poured down his throat.

    For more information, read:
    Plutarch’s Lives (http://classics.mit.edu/Plutarch/crassus.html)
    http://www.livius.org/so-st/spartacus/spartacus.html

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazines.

  • Today's episode's script was written by Andrew Tumath of Aberdeen,United Kingdom. To submit your own script, please send them to me [email protected]

    The Anglo-Dutch Wars were a series of thedistinct conflicts waged between England and the United Provinces (modern-dayNetherlands) in the middle years of the 17th-century. Fought for differentreasons, alongside different allies, and with different results, the warspitted the two great maritime powers of the period against each other, untilboth came to realise that the real threat came from the France of Louis XIV.Almost uniquely maritime in nature, there wasn’t a single action in the threeconflicts in which an English army faced a Dutch one.

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine
  • This episode is an analysis of the environmental impacts of the currentwar in Iraq. There are several major categories, each of which will bediscussed. This episode is meant to be an overview of therarely-discussed ecological situation in Iraq, rather than a persuasivepiece towards one viewpoint or another. The entire episode willrevolve around environmental issues--political and strategic issues andbiases will not be included.

    Negative Effects:Oil Fires: Saddam lit oil wells on fire, resulting in extreme air pollution.Oil Spills: the oil wells spilled into the surrounding ground and sea, ruining vast expanses of animal habitats.Depleted Uranium: DU munitions used by Coalition forces have chemically wounded thousands of Iraqis and Americans.War Machines: Military vehicles and structures wreak havoc through the fragile deserts of Western and Northern Iraq.Munitions: Unexploded ordinances and explosion craters have wrecked acres and acres of potential farmland.Water Pollution: Unnatural or unhealthy chemicals, such as oil and human biomass, have entered waterways in large quantities, thereby rendering them unusable.Infrastructure Damage: The lack of leadership in Iraq means that significant environmental problems, such as broken sewage systems, never get fixed.Fiscal Allocation: Funds allocated to defense could have been used to pursue environmentalist initiatives.Positive Effects:Iraq War is a major catalyst for the “alternative energies initiative?.Saddam’s ecologically harmful policies will no longer devastate the Iraqi ecosystem.Iraq’s relationship with the United Nations has improved, meaning that UN environmental agencies can now safely enter the region.For more information, read:
    Environmental Science by Richard Wright
    The Gulf War Aftermath by Mohammed Sadiq
    Desk Study on the Environment in Iraq by the United Nations Environment Program
    The Iraq Quagmire by the Institute for Policy Studies
    The Environment Consequences of the war in Iraq by the UK Green Party

    Special thanks to: Captain Christopher Green, Corporal Trent Davis, and Master Sergeant Jonny Lung

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine

  • John McCain Sr: Admiral, Commander of Fast Carrier Task Force in South Pacific during WWII
    John McCain Jr: Admiral, Commander of Pacific Command during Vietnam War
    John McCain III: Navy aviator, shot down in Hanoi, tortured as aprisoner of war for 5.5 years, currently running for Republicannomination for President of the United States

    Other presidential candidates with military experience are:
    Chris Dodd: Army ReserveMike Gravel: Lieutenant, Counter-Intelligence Corps (West Germany)Ron Paul: Captain, Flight Surgeon (US Air Force)Duncan Hunter: Lieutenant, US Army RangersFor more information, read:
    http://www.saudiaramcoworld.com/issue/198503/delenda.est.carthago.htm
    http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jsmccain.htm
    www.realclearpolitics.com
    http://www.azcentral.com/news/specials/mccain/articles/0301mccainbio-chapter3.html
    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/15/politics/15mccain.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1198992044-jBYur2uP0d4d90Hp7uLjtA


    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine

  • The title of this episode comes from the following George Orwell quote: “Serioussport has nothing to do with fair play. It is bound up with hatred,jealousy, boastfulness, disregard for all rules and sadistic pleasurein witnessing violence: in other words it is war minus the shooting."This is meant to be a fun episode on the similarities between football, chess, and war. Please take each analogy with a grain of salt.

    Football (two armies fighting to reach the opposing camp/end zone):
    Kick-off Team: SkirmishersQuarterback: Tactical CommanderHead Coach: Strategic CommanderHalfback: Light Infantry ReservesFullback: Heavy Infantry ReservesTight End: Heavy CavalryLinemen (offensive and defensive): Heavy InfantryWide Receivers: Light CavalryCornerbacks: Light CavalryLinebackers: Light InfantrySafeties: Heavy CavalryKicker: Artillery

    Chess (two armies fighting to defeat the opposing commander):
    Pawns: Heavy InfantryRooks: ArtilleryKnights: Light CavalryBishops: Light InfantryQueen: Heavy CavalryKing: Tactical Commander

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine

  • This episode is written by Russell Holman of Merrimack, New Hampshire. If you would like to submit a script to Military History Podcast,please send me an email at [email protected]

    The mighty American military during WWII would have been nothingwithout its surprisingly-important rationing system. Food kept theUnited States going, so therefore, it is well worth studying. Throughout WWII and the years beyond, the US entered/exited several"eras" of rations:
    A RationsB RationsK RationsC RationsLRRP RationsMREsFor more information, read:
    http://science.howstuffworks.com/mre.htm
    http://www.olive-drab.com/od_rations.php
    http://nsc.natick.army.mil/media/print/OP_Rations.pdf

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine

  • Aircraft Carriers are the ultimate tool of modern power projection. They are symbols of both naval strength and air superiority. Thisepisode covers their history and their future:
    1840s: Balloon Carriers are invented1900s: Seaplane Carriers are invented1910s: Modern aircraft carriers are invented1930s-1940s: WWII (five major carrier battles)
    Pearl Harbor: Japan's six carriers surprise the United States NavyCoral Sea: Japan's three carriers engage America's two carriers (both lose one carrier)Midway: America's three carriers engage Japan's four carriersand sink all four, with the help of codebreakers and reconnaissance. Considered a turning point in the Pacific WarPhilippine Sea: America's sixteen carriers destroy or disable all but 35 of the 500 Japanese carrier-based aircraftLeyte Gulf: America's seventeen carriers decisively defeat the Imperial Japanese Navy in the largest naval battle in historyWWII-present: US Carrier Strike Groups control the seasFor more information, read:
    http://www.sandcastlevi.com/sea/carriers/cvchap1a.htm
    http://www.navy.mil/navydata/ships/carriers/cv-list.asp
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/carriers.htm
    http://science.howstuffworks.com/aircraft-carrier.htm
    http://www.combatreform2.com/submarineaircraftcarriers.htm
    The Pacific War Companion by Daniel Marston
    Jane’s Warship Recognition Guide
    Imperial Japanese Navy Aircraft Carriers (1921-1945) by MarkStille
    US Navy Bluejacket’s Manual

    Military History Podcast is sponsored by Armchair General Magazine