Episodit
-
BREAKING:
Former Congressman Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination for U.S. Attorney General, citing concerns that his confirmation process was becoming a distraction for the Trump-Vance transition team. Gaetz, a staunch ally of former President Donald Trump, had faced intense scrutiny since his nomination due to allegations of sexual misconduct.
The allegations, which include claims that Gaetz paid women for sex and had inappropriate encounters with a minor, have been the subject of investigations by the Department of Justice and the House Ethics Committee. Reports suggest the House Ethics Committee may release a detailed report on these allegations, though its jurisdiction ended when Gaetz resigned from Congress shortly after his nomination.
Gaetzâs decision to step aside marks the end of a short-lived bid for the top legal post in the Trump administration. The move comes amid ongoing investigations and growing political pressure. It remains unclear what impact this development will have on Gaetzâs future in public life, as he continues to face scrutiny over the allegations.
The Trump-Vance team has yet to announce a replacement for the role.
We discuss this and other Florida political stories with Kimberly Leonard of Politico.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
Your Guide to the Matt Gaetz Scandal
State of Play:
Ethics report is unreleased as of now, a hacker has apparently obtained parts of the Department of Justice investigation that did not end in prosecution of Gaetz
The iron law of political scandals, as written on the wall of a DC backroom (wash your hands after inspecting): if the public already knows about your dirty deeds and hasnât totally written you off, keep chugging. But every new bit of information that comes out is an exponential risk.
The Gaetz story has been publicly aired for years. So it is really only a liability if new information comes to light.
So what is already known? That way we know if something new comes along.
Well, it comes down to two main questions.
* Are Sugar Babies w****s?
* Is it illegal to sleep with a minor who misrepresents their age? Can the sex be proven beyond a reasonable doubt?
Letâs start with question number one.
Are Sugar Babies w****s?
Which for the pure of heart will begin with a subquestion, what is a Sugar Baby?
A sugar baby is typically a younger individual who enters into a relationship with an older, affluent partnerâknown as a sugar daddy or sugar mommyâin exchange for financial support, gifts, or other benefits. These relationships are often characterized by mutual agreements where the sugar baby provides companionship, and in some cases, intimacy, while receiving monetary assistance, luxury items, or experiences in return.
These connections, like much of our modern world, is facilitated by the internet. For exampleâŠ
Seeking.com is an online dating platform that connects successful and attractive individuals seeking mutually beneficial relationships.
And so it was on Seeking.com that Joel Greenberg, a then-friend of Gaetz who eventually pled guilty to sex trafficking and informed on the congressman, met women to form such relationships. Here is an ABC report of a back and forth between one of the womenâŠ
"I have a friend flying in and we are trying to make plans for tonight. What are your plans for later," Greenberg wrote to the woman, whose identity ABC News is withholding for privacy purposes. "And how much of an allowance will you be requiring :)" Greenberg added.
The woman responded by telling Greenberg she has "a friend who introduced me to the website that I could bring" and said she "usually" requires "$400 per meet."
Greenberg then sent the woman a photo of Gaetz taking a selfie with students at Pea Ridge Elementary from a 2017 visit, and wrote, "My friend," indicating that Gaetz would be the friend joining him.
"Oooh my friend thinks he's really cute!" the woman responded.
Greenberg then replied that Gaetz was "down here only for the day," adding "we work hard and play hard," before asking, "Have you ever tried molly," referring to the drug MDMA, or Ecstasy.
As Greenberg was discussing payment for the get-together, the woman asked if Gaetz used the same website Greenberg had used to meet her. Greenberg replied, in part, "He knows the deal :)," referring to the Florida congressman. The former tax collector then said he would book a "suite Downtown" for the gathering.
Sugar Baby websites are built on the idea that wealthy people connect with attractive people. The implication of money or expensive gifts being exchanged is inherent to the concept. But⊠are the women legally w****s? Specifically, women who are charging money for the act of sex?
This is a very important question. Flying a friend you eventually have sex with across state lines on your dime is a nice thing to do. Flying a w***e across state lines to pay for intercourse is sex trafficking.
We do not have an answer for this. Although Greenberg plead guilty to sex trafficking so he seemingly admitted it.
In general it is a moral and legal question that I am sure many rich men, including possibly some in congress, likely donât want answered.
However, it gets even more serious when one of those women is 17 years old. Which leads us to our second question.
Is it illegal to sleep with a minor who misrepresents their age? Can the sex be proven beyond a reasonable doubt?
A lawyer for two women interviewed by the House Ethics Committee has said the following:
Leppard told POLITICO on Sunday that his clients had attended between five to 10 "sex parties" with the former Florida Representative between 2017 and 2018. Gaetz was already in Congress at the time.
Leppard also said one of his clients witnessed Gaetz having sex with another woman who was then 17 years old. They were at a house party in Florida.
"She testified [that] in July of 2017, at this house party, she was walking out to the pool area, and she looked to her right, and she saw Rep. Gaetz having sex with her friend, who was 17," Leppard said.
A report from The Daily Beast identified two Venmo transactions Gaetz had in 2018 with Joe Greenberg, an accused sex trafficker, for a total of $900. Greenberg then sent the money to three teen girls in transactions labeled "tuition" and "school."
The woman, now in her 20s, reportedly confirmed this during interviews with the House Ethics committee.
In Florida, engaging in sexual activity with a minor is illegal, regardless of whether the minor misrepresents their age. The state enforces strict liability in such cases, meaning that a defendant's belief about the minor's age, even if based on the minor's false representation, is not a valid defense. Florida Statute 794.021 explicitly states that ignorance or a reasonable mistake regarding the victim's age is not a defense to prosecution under sexual offense laws.
And yet⊠the woman in question also testified about this to criminal investigators and no charges were filed against Gaetz. This might suggest that the case against him is less than air tight. Or that proof beyond personal testimony would not stand up at trial.
So no⊠you cannot claim ignorance on having sex with a 17-year-old in Florida. But also, there might not be evidence to prove it happened beyond a he said/she said.
Again: this has all been known for years after Greenbergâs arrest and the Department of Justice investigation.
Will there be new information? We have to wait and see.
But it also might not matter, because Gaetzâ higher hurdle to clear has nothing to do with what he did or didnât do as a military-grade horny Florida Man bachelor⊠but rather his conduct as a rhetorical bomb thrower who has personally torched members of the Senate whose vote he now needs to court.
-
That and more on the show!
CHAPTERS
00:43 Guide to Matt Gaetz Sex Scandal
17:24 Normally Podcast (Karol Markowicz and MK Ham)
49:08 Update: Selzer, Lutnick, Trump's NY Sentencing
58:02 Gabe Fleisher
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
Puuttuva jakso?
-
Things polling get right in 2024:
* Trump had a chance to win the popular vote (he did)
* Trump had an advantage in the Sun Belt but the races in the Rust Belt would be closer (true, Trump still won them all)
* Ticket splitting is real and could save Democrats from a Senate demolition (it did)
But beyond that⊠we have some real questions.
Carl Allen believed Kamala Harris was a favorite to win the electoral college. Together we go through the results and find lessons big and small.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
I am obsessed with how much money the Kamala Harris campaign spent.
Hundreds of millions of dollars per week spent on creating a once-in-a-lifetime glittering election machine only to deliver less electoral votes than John Kerry.
Some FEC reports are available but reporting on the excesses is also bubbling up. For example, Harris recreated the set of Call Her Daddy in a DC hotel room so she didnât have to fly to Los Angeles.
Videos of a party thrown by the KamalaHQ social media team for Fashion Week have also surfaced.
I believe the Harris â24 might be a turning point for donor patience, so we will have much more on it going forward. But to whet your whistle⊠we have Dave Levinthal to chat about it today.
Combine that with Kirk Bado of National Journalâs Hotline to discuss the future of the Democratic Party and you have todayâs episode!
Also, Trumpâs cabinet appointments continue.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction
02:39 Kirk Bado
40:32 Update On Trump Appointments
55:00 Dave Levinthal
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
Much like the Trump Tax Cuts, the $99 Annual Deal for all bonus content is now permanent. Enjoy!
As we sift through the multi-billion dollar wreckage of this election Iâve recruited Evan Scrimshaw to figure out what we know about this election.
First, if you had a Time Machine and your only goal was to increase the vote share of the Biden or Harris campaign, what time would you go back to and what would you say?
Then we carve through the revelations weâve had since Tuesday including understanding Trumpâs popularity and the electoral benefit of putting Jews on the ticket.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
Immediate thoughts on the Trump win.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
ânuff said.
Find your polling place.
Enjoy this entirely non-political conversation with Scott Johnson. Literally, no politics are discussed at all. But there is a lot about religion, fast food, parenthood, weed and more.
See you on the other side.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
You asked! We listened! The $99 Annual Deal is extended until Election Day. Make sure you upgrade from your complimentary status if you are coming from Patreon!
Here it is⊠Our conversation with Kevin Ryan on the state of the culture and philosophy that this election takes place in.
With that, my final thoughts.
Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Plagueis The Wise? I thought not. Itâs not a story the Jedi would tell you.
Thatâs a quote from a Star Wars prequel and itâs the final decider on who I believe will win the President, the Senate and the House.
We will get back to that.
First, letâs empty the file on my 2024 election thoughts in order.
First, the landscapeâŠ
Donald Trump is a flawed candidate damaged by January 6th and hard capped at 48%
Itâs the reason his party tried to overthrow him during the primaries. However, his resilience and ease in overcoming those challenges is telling.
Donald Trump began to gain and beat Joe Biden in head to head polling after he was indicted and his New York trial had a positive effect on his polling
This was the first moment I believed Trump could have a redemptive arc. If the public did not understand the charges against him and saw the prosecutions as political, he would be a martyr beyond core MAGA.
The Dobbs decision has been rocket fuel for Democrats
In off-year elections and special elections the present threat to reproductive rights have gotten Democratic voters to the polls. My criticism that they might be punished for not taking the threat seriously enough has not panned out as of yet.
Joe Bidenâs presidency has been broadly unpopular and specifically unpopular with anyone who makes under $100,000 a year
Biden was elected in the panic of COVID to be a steady hand at the wheel. He lost that with Afghanistan and never regained it. The border went from a purely GOP partisan issue to a mainstream winner for Republicans almost entirely because of executive orders Biden made at the beginning of his presidency.
Issue after issue, the same playbook unfolded⊠deny, deny, deny until you blame it on Trump.
But nothing was more personal than inflation. A class warfare issue like no other.
Personal story, my wife and I were driving to dinner with friends. The husband was at the wheel of their new Tesla. The issue of politics comes up. I mentioned Trump was doing well because of the economy. âBut the economy is good?â Is the response. And it is a sentiment Iâve heard from many people in my orbit and online. The stock market is booming? We avoided a recession? Inflation is lower here than anywhere else the world? How is this a weakness?
And behind the wheel of a new Tesla, I agree.
Which is where we get to that $100,000 a year figure. Because anywhere below that, inflation gets infinitely worse. Itâs persistent and embarrassing. A ritual humiliation and reminder you are not good enough. That kind of stuff sticks with people.
So thatâs the landscape⊠how about the candidates
TRUMP
To say that Donald Trump has run his best campaign out of his three tries is an understatement.
Iâll be honest, I stopped trying to fully understand the logic of Trump sometime in 2016. His combativeness, the issues he centered and erratic behavior is impossible to grade. Why did he just send that tweet? Has he discovered a hidden undercurrent in American society? Or did the KFC bucket he had last night make him farty?
In his two previous attempts he often didnât seem to understand which way was up either. He fired two different campaign directors in 2016. He fired one of them in 2020.
Both times, election day came with him trailing mightily in the polls. The refrain for his chances became religious. He will pull through⊠becauseâŠ
But thatâs not the case this cycle. Susie Wiles, a Florida GOP veteran who watched her party take a purple state and drench it blood red and Chris LaCivita a bare-knuckle student of the last era of a Republican dominance under George W. Bush have run the ship from initial announcement to election day.
Tactically, the boat has pointed in the right direction.
Trump decapitated well-funded rivals in his own party in Desantis and Haley. He ended the political career of the man who beat him in 2020.
Trump has stayed off Twitter and has largely been able to avoid his habit of turning a bad 24 hours into a bad 3 days because of his inability to concede a point. He has mitigated his worst issue, abortion, as well as anyone who appointed the justices that flipped Roe vs. Wade can and accentuated his strengths with the economy and the border.
Of course, he is still Trump. Heâs an a*****e that viserally annoys 40% of the country.
He is the loser pissbaby who couldnât wrap his head around losing in 2020 and did a January 6th. And with that I will now leave space on the page so you can add the pet issue or event that you believe best encapsulates why Donald J. Trump should never be president again.
If you need more space, please open a new window and hit return until you have enough.
He also got shot in the face and survived. Not really sure how that factors into an election.
Which brings us toâŠ
KAMALA
Well⊠Letâs start withâŠ
BIDEN
Joe Biden is unpopular. This is in part because two of his failures played into both sides of the coin that helped him beat Trump.
His strength, foreign policy, where he sat on the powerful Senate committee for years was telegenically shattered with the Afghanistan pullout. It is impossible to say you did a good job when people are falling off the landing gear.
His weakness, the border, which he gleefully signed executive orders for on day one of his presidency created another telegenic disaster and supercharged an abusive of Americaâs asylum system. Itâs impossible to say you did a good job when hundreds of Haitians, Chinese and Congolese have found themselves in Texas border towns.
Add inflation, add Gaza.
But it was his age that ended his career. The one thing he couldnât ultimately shift the blame for.
The depression about his horrific debate created a panic for him to drop out, an unthinkable move as late in the campaign.
Which brings me to Darth Plagueis the WiseâŠ
It was at the RNC when I sat in stadium seating talking with a man I would later be told knows everyone in Washington. We were watching something in a stadium in recessed seating which is what reminds me of the Darth Plagueis scene.
I am steadfast and pig headed that Biden wonât drop out. Heâs too stubborn, I said stubbornly. Very calmly⊠he explains to me that Joe Biden will drop out this Sunday. He would have done it during the RNC but he didnât want to give the most important speech of his career while he had COVID.
Within and hour Mark Halperin reported something similar.
Sunday morning, I wrote a newsletter about how Biden would never say die. Sunday afternoon, Biden announced he would not seek the presidency.
I looked like quite the a*****e.
It was Joe-ver.
My assumption was that taking over a campaign mid-stream was like trying to fix an F1 car while driving it and trying to win a race. Impossible.
And yetâŠ
KAMALA
The Democrats hot swapped Biden for Kamala and for a shining glimmer of a moment⊠it looked like something was brewing.
Brat Summer. Coconut Trees. Unburdned by what has been.
Sure there were some weird moments⊠why do so many big named Dems not want to be VP? But the vibes! THE JOY!
When Kamala selected Tim Walz over Josh Shapiro, the leftist base of the party rejoiced! She picked a man who is at his best explaining liberal solutions to normies! Not the polished Obama clone just because he is the very popular governor of a swing state. This was bold! This was new! This was interesting!
And then⊠she tacked rightâŠ
Wait. Why pick the guy that can explain single payer health care with a Cabelas metaphor if you are going to talk about how Israel has a right to a lethal defense force that can eradicate any enemy it identifies? Why not pick the Jew who is +20 in Pennsylvania?
At least she found a wedge issue to distance herself from Biden⊠wait⊠didnât do that either.
Did she parlay the buzz of the summer into a series of interviews with friendly media to reintroduce herself? Nope. Didnât do that either.
I took a lot of crap from folks when I said she lost the debate. Not because she didnât rhetorically hold her own, but because she had the most to gain by telling America about herself and she mostly spent her time running down Trump.
Cathartic after Bidenâs disaster? Sure. But not the mission.
And she hasnât really done much since then.
To her credit, her campaign has not been a flaming disaster like her 2019 run was.
But⊠one thing seems to be the same as that failure⊠the more America sees of Kamala Harris, the less they like her.
Which brings us toâŠ
THE RACE
Do any of my opinions about the Harris campaign matter?
Donald Trump is a one-man Get Out The Vote drive for the Democrats. The specter of him returning to power raised OVER A BILLION dollars since Kamala took over.
And so we get to the final decision and it is determined by what you believeâŠ
Do you believe polls that say Donald Trump is more popular than he has ever been?
Do you believe polls that say Democrats are at Obama-level excitement for Kamala?
Do you believe (as our friend Ettingermentum has spelled out) that polls are herding to a stalemate because they are terrified to overestimate Democratic support again and are therefore overestimating Trump support?
Do you believe that an administration with a 30/60 right track/wrong track environment can win re-election?
Thatâs a lot to think about⊠much like the Tragedy of Darth Plagueis the WiseâŠ
Because in that RNC conversation with the Guy Who Knows Everyone⊠where he told me the exact day Biden would drop out and I didnât believe him... He told me something else. He told me Kamala would be the candidate.
And he went furtherâŠ
He told me that Democratic power brokers know she canât win. But they know sheâs a bad candidate and donât want her around in 2028 when the party can really rebuild. So this a suicide mission. Raise a lot of money. Give her the old college try. Pat her on the head when itâs over and never have to be in the Kamala Harris business again.
So, do I believe him now?
I believe that Donald Trump is inarguably the defining figure for a decade of politics, love him or hate him.
I believe he has run a better campaign than both of his opponents.
I believe enough independent voters did not have a good time the last four years.
I believe Donald Trump, the 45th president will become the 47th president.
Donald Trump will be the 4,547th president.
I believe the map is too favorable to Republicans to not hand them the Senate.
But I donât believe that a shoddy Get Out The Vote operation and reliance on low propensity voters in blue states is enough to win them the house.
Republican White House, Republican Senate. Democratic House.
Of our four scenariosâŠ
PAX MAGA - Republican Sweep
Democratic Civil War - GOP White House and Senate, Democratic House
Unburdened By What Has Been - Democratic White House and House, GOP Senate
Roe Sends Her Regards - Democratic Sweep
I believe Democratic Civil War⊠is the most likely.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
You asked! We listened! The $99 Annual Deal is extended until Election Day. Make sure you upgrade from your complimentary status if you are coming from Patreon!
We are in the endgame now. Iâve asked experts from across the spectrum who they believe will win the White House, Senate and House. Now itâs my turn.
But I have a few last trusted advisors to speak to first.
Michael Cohen (Model Political Campaigns) and Tom LoBianco of 24Sight.news help break down the closing polls and model out how the election will finally shake out.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
If you would like to get 150 episodes of Politics Politics Politics for $99 please take advantage of our annual deal that ends on Halloween!
By the time you hear this episode, we will have less than seven days until Election Day.
Here are the metrics I am looking atâŠ
Nate Silverâs Silver Bulletin: Trump 54% to win
Jon Ralstonâs Nevada Early Voting Blog: GOP has 38,000 ballot advantage
VoteHub Early Voting Counter
And here is the math comparing the final tallies in Nevada and ArizonaâŠ
Electoral History of Nevada:
Biden +2.5
Clinton +2.5
Obama +6.5
Obama +12.5
Electoral History of Arizona:
Biden + Less than .5
Trump + 3.5
Romney +9
McCain +8.5
How much more Democratic is Nevada than Arizona?
2008: 21
2012: 15.5
2016: 6
2020: 2
On this episode of the show we welcome Taylor Lorenz for the first time. We discuss independent media, the blogging revolution of the 2000s and an unfortunate tweet. Also, Wake Up To Politicsâ Gabe Fleisher helps us look at the final hours of this contest. And finally, Mark Sutton helps us break down the gender gap.
Letâs go!
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
Donât take early numbers too seriously. Itâs the first chapter of a book. You might think you know where it goes, but each story is different. Early votes are not linear, they are often jumbled by different start times or counting processes.
So donât take them seriously.
Okay? Did you read that? Are you not going to take them seriously?
Fine. Letâs torture ourselves with early voting data.
* VoteHub
* Jon Ralston Early Voting Blog
* UMichVoter
AlsoâŠ
The great Bill Scher (Washington Monthly) joins to discuss where Kamala Harris is and how she wins the election. Andrew Heaton tells us of all the political signage heâs seen during his road trip from Texas to Washington DC.
Chapters
2:56 Early Vote
13:21 Bill Scher
1:00:13 UPDATE (Obama and Kamala, $28 million Polymarket Bet, Trump Legal Strategy)
1:09:50 Andrew Heaton
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
If you are looking for good President Harris omens, you might want to check back later.
* Every betting market has now firmly tilted Trump
* Polling averages continue to show Harris wilting in the Blue Wall states
* Silver Bulletin, 538 and The Economist prediction models now all point to Trump
* The Oracle of Nevada Jon Ralston brings positively bleak news about the early vote in the Silver State for Democrats
Take all of those for what you will. But remember this, the only reason why President Biden isnât on this ticket is because down ballot candidates made noise that he was dragging them down.
Well take a look at an ad Bob Casey is running. The Pennsylvania Senator and staunch Biden ally who is in a close race with Republican Dave McCormick is running an ad bragging about bucking the current White House and working with Donald Trump.
Crunch all the numbers you want, nerds.
I will always pay attention when a politician starts running for their own lives in defiance of the party.
On this episode
* Kirk Bado (National Journalâs Hotline) discusses the Kamala Harris fixation on Liz Cheney and if they are even looking for Never Trumpers in the right places.
* Howard Mortman (C-SPAN) dives deep into late campaign trivia and the traditions of the Al Smith dinner.
* Trump will tape Joe Rogan this Friday.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
PATCH NOTES:
* FIXED audio on Jason Whitely Interview
* REMOVED f-bomb
Apologies for the last exportâŠ
â
A listener sent me a curious story: There is a Super PAC running ads online that paint Kamala Harris as a staunch defender of Israel AND a weak capitulator inflaming anti-semitism by pandering to Palestinians.
Donât believe me? Here are the ads.
Why is the Future Coalition PAC countering their own message? They arenât. Theyâre attempting to inflame both sides of the conflict against Kamala Harris in two swing states.
The Pro-Israel ads are not running in ZIP codes with high Jewish populations, theyâre running in Dearborn, Michigan the highest concentration of Arab Americans in the United States. Meanwhile, the Palestinian âPanderingâ ads are running in the suburbs of Pennsylvania where the majority of that crucial stateâs jewish population lives.
The goal of both is to turn those natural Democratic voters against the nominee.
Thatâs only first 10 minutes of our two-hour episode!
* We are joined by Jason Whitely the senior political reporter for WFAA in Dallas. This week he moderated the debate between Colin Allred and Ted Cruz. We talk to him about his moderating philosophy and his thoughts on Texas politics.
* Evan Scrimshaw
and
Ryan Jakubowski
join the show to do a Narrative Draft. What are the topics we believe will dominate the conversation after the election.
* Carl Allen
explains to us why weâve been reading polls the wrong way our entire lives and how to change it.
All that and snap reactions to the death of Sinwar in Gaza.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
A listener sent me a curious story: There is a Super PAC running ads online that paint Kamala Harris as a staunch defender of Israel AND a weak capitulator inflaming anti-semitism by pandering to Palestinians.
Donât believe me? Here are the ads.
Why is the Future Coalition PAC countering their own message? They arenât. Theyâre attempting to inflame both sides of the conflict against Kamala Harris in two swing states.
The Pro-Israel ads are not running in ZIP codes with high Jewish populations, theyâre running in Dearborn, Michigan the highest concentration of Arab Americans in the United States. Meanwhile, the Palestinian âPanderingâ ads are running in the suburbs of Pennsylvania where the majority of that crucial stateâs jewish population lives.
The goal of both is to turn those natural Democratic voters against the nominee.
Thatâs only first 10 minutes of our two-hour episode!
* We are joined by Jason Whitely the senior political reporter for WFAA in Dallas. This week he moderated the debate between Colin Allred and Ted Cruz. We talk to him about his moderating philosophy and his thoughts on Texas politics.
* Evan Scrimshaw and Ryan Jakubowski join the show to do a Narrative Draft. What are the topics we believe will dominate the conversation after the election.
* Carl Allen explains to us why weâve been reading polls the wrong way our entire lives and how to change it.
All that and snap reactions to the death of Sinwar in Gaza.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
The campaign known for booming vibes has hit a recession.
None of Kamala Harrisâ polls in the Rustbelt have increased in October. Some averages are verging on the dreaded 47% line.
That's bad news. Donald Trump is a hard capped 48 % candidate, but you can count on that 48% showing up.
Whatâs more? Other indicators are pointing the wrong direction for Coconut Hive.
Nate Silver on his Silver Bulletin Substack has the race back to a 50% tossup.
Think what you will about the prediction markets, but Polymarket money is beginning to pile on a Trump victory.
Harris â24 knows they need a vibe shift and so they will take a risk! Harris will do an interview with Fox News today. This decision is being hailed as bold and it is.
But itâs also a massive risk.
Kamala has never faced an adversarial interview in her career. Not in California, not in DC, not in her 2019 campaign. This is a big stage to experiment on.
Will it pay off?
We discuss that and so much moreâŠ
Karolâs Substack on the Jewish vote in 2024.
JD Durkin LIVE FROM THE NYSE FLOOR on the economy.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
COMING FROM PATREON? MAKE SURE YOU MOVE YOUR SUPPORT OVER!
Justin Robert Young and polimath (Matt Shapiro) explore the duality of truth in politics, anxiety within the Democratic Party regarding Kamala Harris's campaign and the implications of Biden's debate performance. The conversation delves into the shifting narratives in political discourse, the challenges facing Harris, and the role of FEMA in disaster response. They also touch on voter sentiment, election predictions, coalition shifts, and the future of AI in politics.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
Tom LoBianco wants to tell the FULL story of January 6th from Mike Pence. Justin unveils the four potential scenarios for the 2024 election outcome with Evan Scrimshaw.
Chapters
00:00 The Pence Quest Begins
39:40 Introduction and Election Scenarios
46:26 Positive Republican Outcomes
50:06 Democratic Civil War
55:19 Democratic Optimism
01:01:53 The Case for a Democratic Sweep
01:35:54 The Texas Political Landscape
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
BIG EPISODE TO BEGIN OCTOBER!
Justin gets into the current polling trends with Michael Cohen, separating fact and fiction in Springfield, Ohio and the unusual partnership between Kamala Harris and Liz Cheney.
Claire Meynial makes her Px3 debut to talk about the flashing warning signs for Harris in Dearborn, Michigan.
CHAPTERS
2:53 Michael Cohen
33:01 VP Debate Thoughts
53:57 The Widening War in Middle East
1:10:29 Liz Cheney campaigning with Kamala Harris
1:20:31 The Truth In Springfield, Ohio
1:39:57 Will Middle East Cost Harris Michigan?
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
Justin Robert Young and Andrew Heaton discuss the vice presidential debate, analyzing a sparkling JD Vance and slightly wobbly Tim Walz.
00:39 Vance Won
09:53 Joe Biden Erasure
12:35 Moderation and Fact-Checking in Debates
18:41 The Lack of Personal Attacks
21:34 Trade Policies and Economic Perspectives
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe -
The least consequential debate of the cycle? OF COURSE WE'RE STILL GOING TO GRIND THE TAPE! Vance vs. Ryan in 2022 and Walz vs. Jensen in 2022. I actually think this debate is actually going to be good.
Also, Jeff Maurer (Last Week Tonight, I Might Be Wrong) joins the show to discuss why all political communications from campaigns try to be funny these days.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe - Näytä enemmän
