Episodit
-
On November 1, several amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines took effect. Some of these changes are significant, offering advantages to the defense, while others are less beneficial.
However, ultimately, this process amounts to nothing more than "Kabuki Theatre," meaning the tortured guideline applications become merely performative, because 18 U.S.C. § 3553, enables discerning judges to overlook the sentencing recommendations provided by the guidelines.
Thus, it is crucial to be informed about these amendments to argue effectively whether and how they should be considered in the final analysis.
IN THIS EPISODE:
Some eye-popping facts and stats after forty years of guideline sentencing; Relevant conduct amendment to now exclude acquitted conduct (but it comes with a big but…) Possibility that new litigation may void the Kisor fix because of commission overreach by overriding congress and/or resolving circuit splits; The “Kisor” work-around to fix the intended loss issue under the fraud guideline; The implication and larger application of the Kisor workaround – i.e., support for the argument that for other guidelines, if it’s in the commentary, it doesn’t count; Clarification of the new Zero Point Offender provisions (ZPO) to deny eligibility for anyone who gets an upward role adjustment; And, perhaps the one bright spot, adding a potential downward departure for “youthful offenders” (mid-20’s or less); Practice tips for navigating the new guidelines provisions; Information on reaching out to the commission for future proposed guideline amendments.LINKS:
United States Sentencing Guidelines online: https://guidelines.ussc.gov/apex/r/ussc_apex/guidelinesapp/home
My new Album! The guidelines are 40 years old, which is also when I picked up my first guitar. So, yes, I had to give a shameless plug for my first rock record, "One Good Thing", which is available everywhere you stream your music! Music is another creative outlet that keeps me sane and quiets my brain: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_kyVV0Qs1xMGqXQYZlzHzBgUlA7A35aENI
FAREWELL 2024!!!!
This will be the last new episode of 2024. As always, I wanted to thank you for listening, constributing, liking, subscribing and spreading the word about Set for Sentencing. We have been going strong for over two years now, and the show was recently ranked #7 among the 35 “must-follow” Criminal Defense podcasts in 2024, via Feedspot (35 Best Criminal Defense Podcasts You Must Follow in 2024).
So, per a tradition I started in 2023, I’ll be taking the rest of the year off! The remaining episodes of the year will be re-broadcasts of either other podcasts I have appeared on or some earlier episodes I adore and may have been overlooked when the audience was smaller.
2025 will be a wild ride, and we’ll be right here with you, buckled up and ready to roll. Until then, I’m grateful for all of it, and I hope you find some peace, light and love as the year winds down.
-
We’ve spent a lot of time running down the BOP, and not without good cause, BUT we don’t give as much attention as we should to the positive things happening inside those walls. Lawyers need to learn about and advocate for beneficial programming placements for clients, especially those with special needs. Therefore, helping us get set for sentencing is Dr. Alix McLearen, former acting director of the BOP and psychologist who is responsible for the creation of some really important programs, including the Skills program for clients on the Autism spectrum,
IN THIS EPISODE:
The Skills Program (for those on Autism Spectrum or have other special needs); The F.I.T. program (Female Integrated Treatment); Directory of First Step Act approved programs; Advice for lawyers to improve their advocacy at sentencing when it comes to prison; Dr. Mclearan's servicesLINKS:
Contact Dr. Alix McLearen at: [email protected]
OTHER BOP PODCAST EPISODES:
Please visit www.setforsentencing.com or YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/@setforsentencing/videos) for several other episodes on the functioning (or more likely dysfunctioning) of the federal prison system, including, Ep. 99 (BOP Horror Stories); Ep. 83 (BOP Stands for Back Off Punishment!); Ep. 70 (BOP Stands for Backwards on Purpose); Ep. 67 (BOP Stands for Big Ol' Problems); Ep. 44 (3 Years of Hell: Covid & the BOP); Ep. 3 (Telling the Story of Prison at Sentencing).
Directory of Programming at BOP: fsa-approved-program-guides-en.pdf
Federal Prison Guidebook (Alan Ellis): https://alanellis.com/federal-prison-guidebook/
-
Puuttuva jakso?
-
We spend so much time and engergy trying to develop our knowledge and skill to better represent our clients. And keeping abreast of all major developments in the law is paramount to a successful legal practice.
But there’s one thing every lawyer needs, and it does not exist – a crystal ball. If we were clairvoyant we could anticipate favorable changes in the law that we could use to our advantage right now, even before the ruling happens.
The bigger problem, especially in federal court, is that if we enter a plea agreement (which is almost every case), we almost always waive our right to challenge changes in the law that would even prove a client is innocent of the crime to which he pled!
Therefore, in an effort to aid in your clairvoyant powers on the subject of federal FRAUD cases, we give you Thompson v. United States, a “sleeper case” headed for the Supreme Court.
Reading the tea leaves of prior recent court decisions on fraud crimes, the muck at the bottom of the mug tells us that if the Court continues on their quest to narrow the scope of federal fraud prosecutions, could result in a seismic shift in many cases where the fraud is predicated on the accused making “false statements. “
IN THIS EPISODE:
Summary of the Thompson case; The distinction between “false statements” versus “misleading statements”; The need to make a record before, during, and after a plea; Consider negotiating a conditional plea that preserves your right to appeal should the Thompson case go our way; How long it may take to get a ruling from the court on Thompson; Plea implications of Thompson; Sentencing implications of Thompson (relevant or acquitted conduct).FREE DOWNLOAD:
Visit the shownotes (link below) for this episode for a free download of the article we discussed in this episode laying out the Thompson case and its potential impact on the future of federal fraud!
https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/future-of-fraud/
AFTERTHOUGHT:
It occurred to me when editing this podcast a very important practice tip now that there is this great body of S.Ct. law limiting fraud and cert having been granted on Thompson: We should strongly consider asking for a “Bill of Particulars” in every case, to make the government state, with specificity what the alleged fraudulent conduct was, as if it was an omission or a misleading statement, rather than an outright LIE, then you may have a fighting chance at defeating the charge, and/or mitigating your sentence.
LINKS:
Mark Allenbaugh: www.sentencingstats.com
Check back here soon for an updated link to Mark's Law 360 article on this topic!
-
Where we are born, how many times we were forced to relocate, and the kinds of things happening, or not happening, in our communities, our schools and other institutions in those locations are all important to give context to a client's life and choices.
But how do we tell those stories at sentencing?
Thankfully, there's an amazing expert that can do it with compassion, grace and an unparralled skill set: Social Geogrpaher, Dr. Julie Urbanik!
Her outside the box approach to mitigation is something that should be on every defense attorney's radar.
IN THIS EPISODE:
The connection between geography and criminal defense; Explanation of “mitigation geonarratives”; Explanation of “body maps”; Explanation of “memory walks”; Other uses of video to tell the mitigation story;LINKS:
Julie’s website is www.julieurbanik.com
Email contact: [email protected]
Here is the link to Dr. Urbanik's peer-reviewed publication on the topics we discussed, including several examples of her work: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291121000553
Lastly, we mentioned a couple of other podcasts with incredible legal professionals that can attest to Dr. Urbanik's great work:
Episode 58 - Life in the Shadow of Death with Atty Cyndy Short:
https://youtu.be/-0Dsy8pTt_Q?si=g_al0g4FO5k7nZaO
Episode 28: The Heart & the Head: Holistic Sentencing with Mitigaiton Specialist Victoria Rusk
https://youtu.be/7vtaFT9TKl4?si=vqnrwEQDMz32ipHg
-
I can’t think of a better topic for our 100th episode of Set For Sentencing – the topic that is so near and dear to my heart – MITIGATION FILMMAKING!
Mitigation films are arguably the most powerful and persuasive weapon in our advocacy arsenal. They offer an unparalleled way to humanize a client and show the truth of their journey, rather than simply telling it.
However, there’s currently a significant gap in learning and leadership within the world of mitigation filmmaking. With no established standards and a lack of a supportive community, many well-intentioned individuals—whether new to the legal field or even the supervising lawyers—often lack the comprehensive skill set needed to produce these films effectively. This gap can be detrimental to both the client and the broader cause.
That’s why a group of dedicated, highly experienced professionals is coming together to form REEL DEFENSE: A MITIGATION FILM COLLECTIVE! This non-profit entity is committed to educating, building community, and producing these essential films for those who might not have the resources to do so themselves.
Visit www.reeldefense.org and consider making a tax-deductible donation to support this worthy endeavor!
IN THIS EPISODE:
What is a mitigation film and why is it such a powerful persuasive tool of advocacy? Announcing a new, non-profit endeavor – the mitigation film collective! Examples of great results gained through use of video advocacy Why your judges will love these (even the ones that say they hate ‘em); Why the claim that these are just for “rich people” is a false narrative; How you can support the newly formed, non-profit mitigation film collective! Mitigation movies and the Simpsons!? Bad Actors in the Mitigation film arena Upcoming training opportunities with the collectiveLINKS:
To make a tax-deductible donation or learn more about the Collective, please visit: www.reeldefense.org
Sample sentencing videos: If you've never seen one, here is a sample. This was done for the first defendant to plead guilty and be sentenced in the plot to kidnap the Gov. of Michigan. He received, by far, the most favorable sentence of any of the individuals charged, and the video played a big part in that: https://youtu.be/AOhOY3uuvRQ?si=7UO2LO1EPzDDF8SW
New Book on Holistic Defense: Early in the episode, I told you about Katie Carter's new book, Holistic Defense: a Practice. It's a must read for anyone doing criminal defense work. You can buy it here: https://www.carterinvestigations.com/shop/product/
EXTRA: The Saga of Lance Oppenheim:
One reason for the colletive is to guard against “bad actors” who either enter the space without the proper perspective to do the work, or who simply seek to exploit the medium for their own gain. We talked specifically, in this context, about a filmmaker named Lance Oppenheim. While we spared the audience much of the gory details, suffice it to say, Lance manipulated his way into the defense community and behaved badly in order to further his own ambition. And, while we're here to uplift and inspire, sometimes people just need a reality check.
Back around 2014, Lance was a Harvard undergrad with big ambition. He took advantage of legal professionals (myself included) that thought they were helping him with a school project, and then preyed on our vulnerable clients by using portions of their mitigation films without permission. He neglected to mention that the little supposed “student film” he was making was actually going to be submitted to the New York Times for the world to see. The story of Lance and his careless attitude about what we do and who we do it for, is a cautionary tale of why only those who are trustworthy and hold the mission of providing quality, holistic, representation sacred can be allowed into the inner circle of mitigation filmmakers.
-
It's not even October yet, but this episode feels tailor made for Halloween. It's no secret that the BOP is deeply dysfunctional, dangerous, and dehumanizing. And the stories of deprivation and death inside the walls of the BOP abound.
But lawyers are not telling these stories enough at sentencing, and as a result, Judges often have no idea of the real scope of punishment they are inflicting.
Therefore, it's important to share these true stories, and then act on them- in every case, and in every way you can.
IN THIS EPISODE:
Horror stories of death and deprivation in the BOP; The BOP’s form letter parlor trick; The danger of going to an FMC; The danger of being in transit; How inmates are threatening suicide to get adequate medical treatment; Stories of hope – how lawyers and their experts are slowly but surely achieving results by telling the story of prison; A list of action items for telling the story of, and hopefully FIXING, the BOP.LINKS:
OIG Compendium of BOP issues: https://oig.justice.gov/news/compendium-federal-bureau-prisons-oversight-products
Expert Prison Consultants (Maureen Baird & Jan Perdue): https://expertprisonconsultants.com/
Walter Pavlo: www.Prisonology.com
60 minutes piece with Collette Peters: https://youtu.be/3l6wdVxr6nE?si=71Wy9-d9WoQkDh6B
Furman Opinion (U.S. v. Chavez): https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/22cr303%20US%20v%20Chavez%20Opinion%201.4.2024-1.pdf
—————
Other BOP PODCAST EPISODES:
Prison Consultants and the Myth of the Fixer: https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/prison-consultants-and-the-myth-of-the-fixer-how-to-separate-substance-from-snake-oil/
BOP Stands for Big Ol’ Problems: Exposing Dysfunction & Danger at the Federal Bureau of Prisons https://youtu.be/kYn1uq-Hfes?si=b6fWmPDMdc8Soe0_
BOP Stands for “Backwards On Purpose” With Current BOP inmate Bilal Kahn: https://youtu.be/MQjT-anqAjg?si=sVk0c3yn-T96AyZ
Telling the story of Prison at Sentencing with Maureen Baird: https://youtu.be/fCls6d1pzuA?si=kprd9q2DCaI7XPie
---------------------------
BILAL KHAN BOOK LINKS:
SURVIVING PRETRIAL, by BILAL KHAN, ON AMAZON: https://a.co/d/9ZhE9h5
THE 2255 MOTION HANDBOOK: A POST-CONVICTION RELIEF GUIDE FOR FEDERAL INMATES:https://a.co/d/atpF2AP
-----------------------
BOP IN THE NEWS:
This compelling and comprehensive NPR article came out right before this podcast episode dropped – it documents the high rate of DEATHS in the federal BOP due to failure to render prompt medical care, short staffing, and other issues:
https://www.npr.org/2023/09/23/1200626103/federal-prison-deaths-butner-medical-center-sick-inmates
-----------------------------
LIVE CLE SEMINAR WITH DOUG PASSON AND PATRICK BARONE!
Lastly, here’s a link to register for our psychodrama and storytelling at sentencing seminar (social atom) CLE in Michigan, in October, here’s the link and don’t forget the podcast discount code : S4S10
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/mitigating-with-impact-harnessing-the-power-of-social-atoms-in-sentencing-tickets-811822341477?aff=websitereferral
-
Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) can help avoid prison and even a keep a person's record felony-free. And, the Biden DOJ has encouraged it's regional US Attorney offices to devise their own policies for DPAs and to be more liberal with their application.
But, local federal prosecutors seem to be ignoring their boss's mandate. They're reluctant to make new policies, let alone to actually offer diversion.
Therefore, we need to be more aggressive about adovocating for DPAs and unearthing local policies.
To that end, we welcome back attorney and author Jon May, who has been at the forefront of this fight.
IN THIS EPISODE:
Becoming aware of federal diversion; Advocating for diversion policies nationwide; Suggestions on how to position your case for diversion.LINKS:
Episode 38: Who Says You Can't: Strategies for Creative Lawyering with Jon May
https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/jonmay/
Jon’s Latest Book: Who Says You Can’t? Strategies and Tactics For Becoming a More Creative Criminal Defense Lawyer:
https://members.nacdl.org/online-store/merchandise-details/?action=view&id=68fcfb2a-c07b-ed11-a76e-0003ff66b1f0
Attorney General's 2022 Memo on DPAS:
https://sentencing.typepad.com/files/attorney-general-memorandum---general-department-policies-regarding-charging-pleas-and-sentencing.pdf
Jon May's Website: https://www.jonmaycriminaldefense.com/
Jon's Substack: https://jonmay.substack.com/
-
It’s a gloomy night in Oklahoma City. I’m holed up in a hotel working on a capital case. But I’m in a dark place. Last week I saw a terrible injustice occur in a matter in which I was involved as a consultant. The lawyers did a fantastic job of making their case for a non-custodial sentence, but all of their arguments and impassioned pleas fell on deaf ears.
We spend a lot of time on this podcast talking about our triumphs. But anyone who does this work knows that epic losses are part of the deal. And they hurt. So let’s talk about it.
This is a departure from my usual episode. I’ve always had a guest. Today, it’s just me. Putting it all out there. It was cathartic. Probably indulgent. Hopefully there’s something in there you can take away.
IN THIS EPISODE:
Autism; Avoiding the bus bench lawyer; The truth about flat fees; Working with a competent legal team; Telling the story of prison; The need to walk the walk when it comes to remorse and acceptance – do something to right the wrong; The criminal justice system is a (rigged) lottery.LINKS:
First Autism Episode with Jamie and Toni Sparks;
https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/understanding-autism-at-sentencing/
Defending Autism With Mark Mahoney (Part One):
https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/defending-autism-mark-mahoney-pt-1/
Defending Autism With Mark Mahoney (Part Two):
https://setforsentencing.com/tag/mark-mahoney/
Bilal Khan Episode: Is My Lawyer Any Good?
https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/surviving-pretrial-vol-1-is-my-lawyer-any-good/
Bilal Khan Book (Surviving PreTrial)
https://a.co/d/9vN1A8F
On Deaf Ears – this is the part of the soundtrack of my misery this week. Music is the salve that heals any wound. I adore this song (and album) from “Joseph the Spouse”, which is fronted by Chris Sullivan, an incredible actor you’ve seen as Toby in “This is Us” and Tom Cleary in “The Knick”. Anyway, it’s the bomb. Take a listen. https://youtu.be/VelUZgdLQwU?si=egf45hGGXASHQZqW
-
Psychodrama has been used by trial lawyers for decades. But it hasn't been effectively deployed for use at SENTENCING.... until now.
While psychodrama action therapy requires a trained professional to implement, there good news is there are psychodrama-adjacent techniques that can help any lawyer dig for, develop, and deliver a powerful and persuasive sentencing presentation!
In this episode, Patrick Barone, a 30+ year criminal defense attorney and certified trainer, educator and practitioner of psychodrama introduces us to two such "psychodramatic action techniques" - the social atom and psychodramatic letter-writing.
This is a TWO-PART EPISODE!. The timing of its release was deliberate, as Barone and Passon just co-authored an article for "The Champion", the premiere criminal defense publication of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL). The issue will soon be in NACDL member's mailboxes. For those without a subscription, we will soon make the article available (for free) for download at www.setforsentencing.com/psychosentencing1.
Lastly, if anyone is interested in registering for our first CLE in Michigan, in October, here's the link and don't forget the podcast discount code : S4S10
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/mitigating-with-impact-harnessing-the-power-of-social-atoms-in-sentencing-tickets-811822341477?aff=websitereferral
IN THIS EPISODE: -
Doug's Social Atom Psychodramatic Letter Writing Our upcoming live CLE presentationDOWNLOADS: FOR THE FOLLOWING DOWNLOADS, PLEASE VISIT THE SHOWNOTES AT THE SET FOR SENTENCING WEBSITE: www.setforsentencing.com/psychosentencing SOCIAL ATOM INSTRUCTIONS AND SAMPLE & NACDL CHAMPION ARTICLE: The Story of a Life: Uncovering Deep Levels of Sentence Mitigation Using Psychodramatic Action Techniques by Patrick T. Barone and Doug Passon:
OTHER LINKS: Original Psychodrama Podcast (Psychodrama 101) With Patrick Barone: https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/sentencing-psychodrama/ Barone Defense Website: https://www.baronedefensefirm.com/patrick-t-barone.html Michigan Psychodrama Center (Patrick Barone and Dr. Elizabeth Corby): https://www.michiganpsychodramacenter.com/
-
Psychodrama has been used by trial lawyers for decades. But it hasn't been effectively deployed for use at SENTENCING.... until now.
While psychodrama action therapy requires a trained professional to implement, there good news is there are psychodrama-adjacent techniques that can help any lawyer dig for, develop, and deliver a powerful and persuasive sentencing presentation!
In this episode, Patrick Barone, a 30+ year criminal defense attorney and certified trainer, educator and practitioner of psychodrama introduces us to two such "psychodramatic action techniques" - the social atom and psychodramatic letter-writing.
This is a TWO-PART EPISODE!. The timing of its release was deliberate, as Barone and Passon just co-authored an article for "The Champion", the premiere criminal defense publication of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL). The issue will soon be in NACDL member's mailboxes. For those without a subscription, we will soon make the article available (for free) for download at www.setforsentencing.com/psychosentencing1.
Lastly, if anyone is interested in registering for our first CLE in Michigan, in October, here's the link and don't forget the podcast discount code : S4S10
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/mitigating-with-impact-harnessing-the-power-of-social-atoms-in-sentencing-tickets-811822341477?aff=websitereferral
IN THIS EPISODE: -
A brief overview of psychodrama 30:00: The Social AtomDOWNLOADS: FOR THE FOLLOWING DOWNLOADS, PLEASE VISIT THE SHOWNOTES AT THE SET FOR SENTENCING WEBSITE: www.setforsentencing.com/psychosentencing SOCIAL ATOM INSTRUCTIONS AND SAMPLE & NACDL CHAMPION ARTICLE: The Story of a Life: Uncovering Deep Levels of Sentence Mitigation Using Psychodramatic Action Techniques by Patrick T. Barone and Doug Passon:
OTHER LINKS: Original Psychodrama Podcast (Psychodrama 101) With Patrick Barone: https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/sentencing-psychodrama/ Barone Defense Website: https://www.baronedefensefirm.com/patrick-t-barone.html Michigan Psychodrama Center (Patrick Barone and Dr. Elizabeth Corby): https://www.michiganpsychodramacenter.com/
-
A good investigator can be essential to winning cases at trial or sentencing. They bring a fresh perspective and outside-the-box techniques that help lawyers better communicate the truth of their sentencing story.
This week, we’re thrilled to have Justin Yentes, one of the best investigators in the business, on our podcast!
Justin’s wealth of experience in the criminal and civil world, including death penalty cases, makes this episode a must-listen.
During our time together, Justin shares super practical case advice, captivating war stories, and even dives into some tequila talk. If you haven’t already, check out his new podcast, ‘Truth Be Found,’ available on all major platforms.
Also, because we talked about cutting edge video investigatory techniques, and showed several video samples, this may be a good episode to watch on YouTube rather than just audio.
In any event, wherever you go, please like, subscribe and leave a review!
IN THIS EPISODE:
Using Drones, Go Pros, VR, and other cutting edge investigation tools; A journey into gang-ridden El Salvador; immersive storytelling to bridge the gap of cultural understanding; Tips for working with investigators; Pimps up, hos down; Tequila!LINKS:
Justin's website
Truth Be Found (Apple Podcast)
Truth Be Found (Instagram)
Truth Be Found (TikTok)
Truth Be Found (Facebook)
EQUIPMENT RENTAL! Justin and I talked about the option of RENTING video equipment rather than buying, which is always my go to option. My favorite place to rent top quality equipment, for very reasonable prices and easy shipping is Lensrentals.com. Here is my "refer a friend link". If you use it, you get 25 bucks off your first rental! https://share.lensrentals.com/x/sI5M9C
#LegalInsights #InvestigativeTechniques #JusticeMatters #CriminalLaw #SentencingStories #PodcastRecommendation
-
The FSA is meant to give non-violent offenders a chance to significantly reduce their term of incarceration through programming and good conduct.
But, the BOP is proving to be unwilling or unable to properly implement the law.
Helping us get set for sentencing this week is Walt Pavlo, founder of prisonology.com and frequent contributor to BOP issues for Forbes online.
Walt and I discuss all the issues with FSA (and Second Chance Act) implentation, as well as offer many useful practice pointers.
LINKS
www.prisonology.com
https://oig.justice.gov/news/compendium-federal-bureau-prisons-oversight-products
-
We went live the day after Hunter Biden was convicted in Federal Court on three firearms charges.
Not only do we take a deep dive into Hunter Biden's sentencing issues, we also peel back the layers of this new-ish word permeating the lexicon of the right/Trump supporters -- LAWFARE.
Lawfare refers to the supposed "weaponization" of the criminal justice system. The term has been deployed on right wing media and social media, in refernce to the many Trump civil and criminal cases, and all of the folks in the Trump orbit who now find them selves having to defend themselves in courts across the land.
Is "Lawfare" really a thing? If so, what does that term really mean? And, if it applies, should it not apply to the Hunter Biden prosecution?
IN THIS EPISODE:
How prevalent are these specific federal gun charges? What are the guidelines and sentencing stats for these offenses of conviction? What other sentencing arguments can/will Mr. Biden present? How will these convictions and sentencing impact his next (tax) prosecution? Sentencing predictions? Is Lawfare real? -
Marilyn Mosby, Baltimore’s former top prosecutor, made headlines for her bold actions during her tenure. She fearlessly took on the Baltimore police, charging those involved in Freddie Gray’s death, and advocated controversial positions, including refusing to prosecute low-level drug offenders. However, her own legal journey took an unexpected turn. Accused of federal fraud violations, she faced trial and ultimately received a non-custodial sentence. Was this an outlier? Did she receive special treatment? Join Doug Passon and Mark Allenbaugh as we delve into these questions and more on this week’s episode of Set for Sentencing!
IN THIS EPISODE:
The backstory of the Marilyn Mosby Prosecution; Digging into the sentencing data and the facts to determine whether her non-custodial sentence was warranted; Critique of the sentencing memoranda (spoiler alert, the defense memo was F’ing fantastic); In praise of the Federal Public Defender; Gender disparity at sentencing; Walking the tightrope of using your kids as mitigation; Why lawyers should be less scared about going to trial; Remember that the guidelines actually suggest NON-CUSTODIAL sentences for ALL first time offenders!; Arguing collateral consequences at sentencing; Navigating the pitfalls of not accepting responsibility after trial.LINKS:
"The 3Rs of Sentencing Narrative": In this I make a few references to something I call “relativity” and “redemption” stories, which are 2 of the “3Rs” of sentencing. If you’d like to dig into the full 3Rs, visit the shownotes on the website and you'll find a link to an article I wrote on the subject for the Champion.
www.setforsentencing.com/mosby
-
It shocked the nation when David DePape, driven by insane QAnon conspiracy theories, violently attacked Paul Pelosi, husband of former Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
A federal judge recently sentenced DePape to 30 years in prison. With that de facto life sentence looming, we uncover a legal twist: the judge’s oversight during sentencing denied him the chance to speak in his own defense. Now, a follow-up hearing is in the offing, leaving us wondering—will DePape break his silence, and will the sentence change?
More importantly, at sentencing his lawyer reveals that DePape has documented mental health disorders, including Autism Spectrum Disorder. Yes, we're going there -- again.
In this episode, we explore the intersection of radicalization and vulnerability, particularly online, among individuals with ASD. Could this condition render them more susceptible to extremist ideologies?
#DePapeCase #SetForSentencing #Radicalization #MentalHealth #Autism
LINKS:
Original DePape Podcast: https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/david-depape-pelosi-attacker-guidelines-mitigation-breakdown/
Alan Ellis - Articles about What Judges Look For At Sentencing:
https://alanellis.com/law360-series-sentencing-representation/
For a copy of Judge Bennett's Article, go to shownotes at the Set for Sentencing website:
https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/depape-pelosi-at…cing-post-mortem/
-
The pre-sentence report is arguably the most crucial sentencing document. Not only does it serve as a vital tool for judges during sentencing, but it also acts as the “bible” that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) relies on to make critical decisions about our clients.
Unfortunately, many lawyers struggle to properly prepare their clients or ensure the report’s accuracy before it reaches the BOP.
In this episode, we’re fortunate to have Leslie Lockwood as our guest. Ms. Lockwood spent her career as a pre-sentence report writer in the Eastern District of NY, including several years as a supervisor. She’ll provide valuable insights into federal pre-sentence reports, covering topics such as best practices for pre-sentence interviews, the role of pre-sentence writers, and more.
-
Artificial intelligence is here and it’s getting more sophisticated and more ubiquitous every day. Indeed, the legal community seems to be largely embracing A/I with open arms.
But the jury is still out whether this somewhat terrifying new technology is going to be our savior or our destroyer.
Therefore, helping us get set for sentencing this week are two great gentlemen: a lawyer (Patrick Barone) and communications expert (Dr. Randy Olson) to debate the pros and cons of A/I in life, and in law.
IN THIS EPISODE:
Using A/I as an editor in legal writing; Using A/I to help a client prepare to allocute at sentencing; Using A/I to summarize voluminous discovery and creating summaries for clients; A/I’s limitations; The concept of “prompt engineering” and it’s importance in generating the best A/I results; The importance of infusing meaning into our sentencings, our stories, and our lives.OTHER LINKS:
We spent a fair amount of time discussing the "ABT" Narrative template. It's a simple way of powerfully communicating in narrative form in any setting. I co-authored a book on this with Dr. Randy Olson and have done a few podcasts on the topic. Here's Episode four: https://setforsentencing.com/podcast/narrative-is-everything/
Here's a link to buy the book: https://a.co/d/0dVt1MP
As we discussed, the big fault with all of this new technology is the risk that it robs your pursuits of all meaning! This goes to the core of what Randy’s big critique about A/I is at this moment, it’s MEANING that makes our lives worth living. That’s why we love telling, watching, reading, and listening to stories so deeply – great stories are infused with big meaning- universal truths about life. I wrote about this on my blog a few years back in the context of the epic Tarantino Film, “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”. Take a look:
https://dougpassonlaw.com/articles/every-good-story-has-meaning/
More on Patrick Barone: https://www.baronedefensefirm.com/
More on Randy Olson: http://abtframework.com/randy-olson/
-
Today history is being made, as the first criminal trial of a former president for multiple felony allegations begins in New York.
But none of the pundits seem to be talking about what happens if Trump loses at trial.
Therefore, helping us get set for sentencing is a superb New York criminal defense attorney, Richard Willstatter, to break it all down.
IN THIS EPISODE:
Possible sentencing ranges if convicted; Whether, if convicted, he could be taken into custody upon conviction or sentencing; Whether the judge can consider “other conduct” of Trump at sentencing if convicted; Where Trump might serve a sentence if convicted; How quickly might sentencing occur should he be convicted; Whether Trump could delay his sentencing if convicted.LINKS:
Trump Indictment & Trump Statement of Facts:
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/04/read-the-trump-indictment-document-00087925
Richard Willstatter:
http://greenandwillstatter.com/
-
Last Thursday, Judge Lewis Kaplan sentenced Sam Bankman-Fried to 25 years in prison. Some think that’s an appropriate result. Some think it should have been more.
But this sentence far more than necessary to meet the goals of sentencing. The bigger problem is, there were likely missed opportunities to convince the Judge that justice demanded a lower sentence for Sam.
Therefore, here is the straight scoop on SBF’s sentencing (we have the full transcript) and the larger problems it reveals about federal sentencing and beyond.
IN THIS EPISODE:
Judge Kaplan’s “tip of the cap” to the insurrectionists; The missed opportunity to present powerful sentencing statistics, including average federal sentences for murder, kidnaping, sexual abuse, and child pornography; Judge Kaplan’s explicit comments regarding broken guidelines; Autism Spectrum Disorder – the (largely ignored) elephant in the room; SBF’s sentence compared to (spoiler alert, his sentence is HIGHER than all of ‘em); The missed opportunity of highlighting a LIFE EXPECTANCY analysis at sentencing; The missed opportunity to tell the story of BOP classification issues;LINKS:
Ep. 73: Sam Bankman-Fried: Is Autism the Missing Piece of Mitigation?
https://youtu.be/jkh6eEkvBRg?si=qXJxNu4SBKCqTWEq
-
The guidelines commission is gearing up to make their recommendations for the next round of amendments. It’s the follow-up album to their first hit record, which included memorable songs like The “Zero Point Offender Boogie”, and “Release Me (Compassionately)”. The real question is can they top their debut with their sophomore effort? Will there be any hits? Can we dance to it?
Mark Allenbaugh and I hit the highlights, and offer up some B-side pontifications about the death of the administrative state, why Trump’s immunity claim is destined to die in the Supreme Court, and what rhymes with “acquitted conduct”????
IN THIS EPISODE:
Proposed amendment to reclassify classic “departures” into a generic category; Proposed amendment to deal with “intended loss” issue in fraud cases; The possible death of “Chevron Deference” and what that could mean for the guidelines (spoiler alert – it will render all commentary meaningless); Remembering the “rule of lenity”; Proposed changes to “youthful offender” criminal history provision; Following up on “acquitted conduct”; A really cool discussion about Booker and how the guidelines should (and must) interplay with 18 USC 3553; The only true fix to render the guidelines constitution is to implement “charge offense sentencing”; Revisiting the proposed amendment to criterion 10 of the Zero Point Offender guideline.LINKS:
Acquitted Conduct Revisited with Mark Allenbaugh & Prof. Doug Berman:
https://youtu.be/iRG6cbZ_YCY?si=VZ_IEDp5Zq8Z8esC
Imperfect 10: The Commission’s attempt to fix the Zero Point Offender Criteria:
https://youtu.be/amEXfhgMpa8?si=_tZ9-FIOrw-b4huP
- Näytä enemmän
