Episodes
-
Ellen Greenberg was found dead in her locked Philadelphia apartment in 2011. The medical examiner first ruled it a homicide — then reversed the finding, and the case has been argued ever since. Most of that argument rests on four claims that don't survive scrutiny. A retired police commander and an active 911 dispatcher work the record, not the rumor.In this finale, Drew and Jon break down the four myths driving the Ellen Greenberg case: that no real investigation ever happened, that there was a cover-up, the most uncomfortable myth about motivation, and the claim that the 911 call "sounds fake." Then we do something we rarely do — we make the case for the other side, and the questions that genuinely remain. We are not attorneys, and we don't render verdicts. We analyze how investigations, 911 calls, and forensic rulings actually work — and we let you decide.
Support Hope For The Day. https://www.hftd.org/
-
Here to bring you the best 911 True Crime content-- I hope you'll consider supporting my work with these Spotify-only deep dives of intriguing cases, 911 in the news and all your questions and answers.
-
Episodes manquant?
-
A real 911 dispatcher breaks down the controversial call made by Sam Goldberg upon discovering the body of his fiancé Ellen Greenberg in one of the internet’s most debated true crime cases.
Dissect the emotional 911 call, highlighting key moments, language choices, and behavioral cues that may have influenced dispatcher decisions and police perception and helped establish the initial 'self-inflicted' narrative of the crime scene-- before investigators even arrived.
-
A frantic caller screams that a chimpanzee is ripping her friend apart — and the dispatcher struggles to comprehend what’s happening in real time. I break down one of the most unbelievable 911 calls ever recorded, the danger of treating wild animals like family, and yes… why giving a chimp Xanax may have been a catastrophically bad idea.
-
Months before her murder, Nicole Brown Simpson called 911 begging for help as O.J. Simpson screamed in the background. The warning signs were all there — escalating domestic violence, repeated police calls, and a terrified victim trapped in a cycle the system ultimately failed to stop.
But after the murders, Johnnie Cochran transformed the case from a prosecution of O.J. Simpson into a trial of the LAPD itself, weaponizing the racism and credibility collapse of detective Mark Fuhrman in the shadow of Rodney King and the LA riots. In this episode, a real 911 dispatcher breaks down the infamous tapes, the psychology behind them, and how the strategy used in the OJ trial still shapes defense tactics in America today.
-
Check out what's coming up for our Spotify Subscribers-- this week there's a new episode of Comm Center EVERY DAY THIS WEEK. Perfect for the road trip, the day at the beach or hiding from your creepy uncle who's visiting, COMM CENTER TRUE CRIME takes you to a new 911 True Crime case every day this week. Listen while you can-- June 1, it becomes subscriber only content. Hope to see you then!
-
In January 2011, the Philadelphia medical examiner performed an autopsy on Ellen Greenberg and ruled her death a homicide. Ten weeks later, after a meeting with police and a prosecutor, he changed it to suicide. No new physical evidence was introduced. A retired police commander and an active 911 dispatcher break down the 911 call, the scene, and the institutional process that changed everything. This is Part 1 of 3.
We asked people who have followed this case for years what three questions they most needed answered. The same ones kept coming back. Today we answer every one of them — starting with the phone call that put this entire investigation in motion.
Jon is an active 911 dispatcher and certified crisis negotiator. Drew is a retired police commander with 29 years in law enforcement, including criminal investigations, command administration, and 911 center oversight. Neither is an attorney.
-
In 2010, Shannan Gilbert made a frantic 911 call that became one of the most haunting pieces of audio tied to the Gilgo Beach murders.
Moments later, she vanished.
More than a decade later, the call still raises disturbing questions. Retired police commander Drew and active 911 dispatcher Jon break it down from an operational perspective—examining panic indicators, dispatcher decisions, behavioral red flags, and the critical moments most people miss.
What did dispatch hear in real time?
Were the warning signs already there?
And why does this call still haunt emergency professionals today? -
An Ohio Amber Alert turns into a terrifying hostage standoff when Charles Alexander abducts 7-year-old Oaklynn Alexander, leads police on a high-speed chase across Ohio, and barricades himself with the child while calling 911 and threatening murder-suicide.
In this episode of The Comm Center, Drew Breasy — a veteran police officer — and Jon — a real 911 dispatcher and trained hostage negotiator — break down the pursuit, the dispatch audio, the negotiation tactics, the police response, and the deadly final confrontation that ended with Oaklynn rescued alive.
From the Amber Alert and interstate chase to the chilling 911 calls heard around the country, this is a full breakdown of one of the most intense child-abduction standoffs in recent memory.
-
UPDATE — April 2026: As of March 2026, Carlee Russell has paid approximately $1,154 of the nearly $18,000 she owes to the Hoover Police Department — roughly 6.4% of her total restitution, with $16,820.88 still unpaid. She has been on a $50/month payment plan since October 2024. A court review is scheduled for April 23, 2026. Former Hoover Police Chief Nick Derzis — now the city's mayor — previously called the pace of repayment a slap at the department and the community.
Carlee Russell's case didn't fall apart in court — it started breaking in the 911 call. What dispatchers heard in real time shows why a $40,000 hoax ending in $50-a-month restitution feels so disconnected from the response it triggered.
Active 911 dispatcher Jon and retired Police Commander Drew Breasy break down what the original 911 call actually tells you — including the single-caller anomaly that stood out from the first transmission, the cell data that contradicted the kidnapping claim, and the phone search history investigators found on her device. Then they go deep on what the restitution outcome means for the next person who thinks about pulling the same thing.
Jon is the only active working 911 dispatcher providing real-time operational analysis on a true crime channel. Drew spent 29 years with the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, including time as a Commander overseeing criminal investigations and 911 center administration. This is the case from the inside.
-
Most police officers will never have to pull the trigger.
This one did—and it didn’t end there.
Hear his story in his own words as we break down the call, the split-second decision, and what comes after: the investigation, the silence, and the months of uncertainty that follow—even when you’re cleared.
-
Watch the previous episode in which Jon interviews a real police officer who took a life in the line of duty-- and the massive fallout after the shot was taken. THEN watch this reaction as Jon and Drew give their thoughts, questions from the live chat, and talk other things COMM CENTER.
-
A year ago, our Sandra Birchmore episode aired. A lot has changed. The charges changed. The evidence changed. And one thing we reported in that episode was wrong — we correct it on camera.Matthew Farwell, a former Stoughton Police detective in Massachusetts, is now facing federal trial on October 5, 2026 for the death of Sandra Birchmore, a 23-year-old police explorer who was found dead in her Canton apartment in February 2021. The official cause of death remains suicide. The federal government disagrees.In this update, Drew and Jon break down everything that has changed since the original episode — including newly disclosed DNA evidence, Apple Health data that establishes a precise digital timeline, three independent premeditation witnesses, and the detail that may be the most damning piece of evidence in the entire case: what Matthew Farwell allegedly demonstrated at a work party months before the arrest.We also cover the Canton audit conducted by Five Stones Intelligence, the four law enforcement officers who have been decertified by the POST Commission, and what both sides are bringing into federal court in October.Drew Breasy is a retired police commander with 29 years of experience in criminal investigations, narcotics, wiretap and warrant construction, and interview and interrogation. Jon is an active 911 dispatcher and certified crisis negotiator with 11 years of frontline experience. Neither of us is an attorney.Sandra Birchmore wanted to be a police officer her whole life. She trusted people who wore the badge with her safety. We will hold them accountable just the same.Trial date: October 5, 2026 | US v. Farwell | District of Massachusetts
-
A sitting sheriff was diagnosed with an acute psychological breakdown by his own doctor — 24 hours before he walked into a courthouse and shot a judge nine times on camera. The doctor documented it. The people closest to him had already warned the Kentucky Bar Association. The system had every piece of information it needed to act. And it had no mechanism to do anything with it.This is the complete story of Mickey Stines — from the sextortion ring that started it all, to the 12 minutes inside Judge Kevin Mullins's chambers, to the two hours of body cam footage that sounds like a man who genuinely believed he was being driven to his execution. Active 911 Dispatcher Jon and retired Police Commander Drew Breasy break it down from the inside.
-
Something in this 911 call didn’t line up—and it started almost immediately. This case involves Caleb Flynn, a former American Idol contestant, who called 911 reporting a home invasion before being charged in his wife’s murder.At 2:31 AM, a husband calls 911 claiming someone broke into his home and shot his wife. But from the very first moments of the call, details begin to conflict with what responders expect—and what officers later find at the scene.In this breakdown, an active 911 dispatcher and a retired police commander walk through the call, the bodycam footage, and the crime scene inconsistencies that led investigators to question the story within hours.This is how real responders evaluate calls in real time—and how small details can shape an entire investigation.
-
A North Andover police officer was shot in the chest by a colleague serving a restraining order. He says she pointed the gun at his face. She says she put it to her own temple. There's no bodycam. But there are calls to the police department that tell a story the courtroom hasn't fully told.
-
Drew was inside the Georgia Supreme Court on March 18, 2026 as justices heard oral arguments in Hannah Payne's appeal. Her appellate attorney argued that her trial lawyer made two fundamental legal errors — mistakes even the state doesn't dispute — that eliminated the only defenses that could have led to acquittal. The result: a jury that was told, even if they believed Hannah's entire account, they still had to convict.
In this episode, Drew and Jon break down every argument presented to the court, the questions the justices asked, and a bombshell moment involving fabricated case citations in the state's own court filings. Jon takes the lead on a critical exchange about whether a 911 dispatcher's guidance can strip a citizen of their legal rights — a question a Supreme Court justice asked the state directly, and didn't get a clean answer to.
This is not about guilt or innocence. It's about whether the system gave the jury the correct tools to do their job.
-
In the Kouri Richins murder trial, one witness may have changed the trajectory of the entire case.On cross-examination, Todd Gabler’s testimony was supposed to help the defense challenge the prosecution’s narrative about Eric Richins’ death in March 2022. Instead, the exchange exposed key weaknesses in the defense strategy and reinforced several of the prosecution’s central claims about fentanyl poisoning, financial motive, and the timeline leading up to Eric Richins’ death.In this episode of Comm Center, we'll break down what actually happened during Gabler’s testimony — and why the defense may regret the way that cross-examination unfolded.What did the defense hope to prove?What answers strengthened the prosecution’s theory instead?And how might this testimony affect the jury’s view of Kouri Richins, the Utah woman accused of murdering her husband before later publishing a children’s book about grief?We walk through the courtroom exchange step-by-step and explain how experienced investigators and dispatchers evaluate testimony like this in real time.Topics covered:Todd Gabler’s cross-examination in the Kouri Richins trialHow the defense is desperate to paint him as the police's secret agentThe three questions that made the defense look inept
-
Two weeks after Eric Richards was buried, Kouri Richards met her boyfriend
in the mountains. What she asked him that day — and what he testified about
it on the stand — may be the most damning moment of the entire trial.
This week: Josh Grossman testifies. No immunity deal. No protection. Just a
man compelled by his conscience to tell a jury what happened between him and
Kouri Richards — from the affair, to the text messages, to a conversation in
the mountains that he says he didn't understand until years later.
Drew breaks down the witness from an interrogation and behavioral standpoint.
Jon reads the courtroom dynamics in real time. Then the physical evidence
side of this case takes a serious hit — and we break down exactly what the
Giglio motion means and why the judge's response actually matters.
A retired police commander with 29 years of experience and an active 911
dispatcher with 11 years on the job — breaking down the Kouri Richins trial
from the inside out.
-
Three weeks before Eric Richins died, he survived what investigators now believe was a first attempt. He told his sister. He told his friends. He told multiple people the same thing: if anything ever happens to me, Kouri did it.He was right. He just couldn't testify.This week, jurors heard those prior statements — and a drug dealer's testimony about who was buying what, and when. A retired police commander and an active 911 dispatcher break down what that evidence actually does and doesn't prove.What strengthened this week. What didn't. And what this case still needs to survive.
- Montre plus
