Episodes
-
The plaintiff says the defendant attacked him and his wife while they were riding on his motorcycle. The cops came and the man ended up paying restitution for the injuries, but he didn’t pay it all, so they’re suing. The defendant says the plaintiff hit the window of his car and threatened his wife, so he punched him. He claims the plaintiff was the aggressor.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff says the defendant is her mother, and they used to be close. Her own mother won’t reimburse the money she loaned her, so she’s suing. The defendant says the money was for a car they were sharing, and the plaintiff became selfish about the car. She denies owing a penny.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
Episodes manquant?
-
First, the plaintiff and defendant have been friends since childhood. She and the defendant rented an apartment together and renewed the lease for a second year. The plaintiff says the defendant stopped paying rent, so she’s suing for bills, rent, and other money she is owed. The defendant argues she paid her fair share and doesn’t need to pay.
Then, the plaintiff bought a used car from the defendant. She claims the defendant manipulated her and the sales papers to make it look like she paid less, which is fraud. The plaintiff is suing for her money back. The defendant argues he did not falsify any papers. He says the plaintiff paid monthly but then stopped, so he charged her for late fees. The defendant is countersuing for late fees, harassment, and defamation of character.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff was hired by the defendant to clean his raw hide rug. He and the defendant agreed on a price, but the plaintiff says the defendant stopped paying. He’s suing for his payment. The defendant argues the plaintiff didn’t do a good job on the rug because the stains didn’t come out.
Then, the plaintiff drives for Lyft. He says the defendant crashed into his car and damaged it badly. He’s suing for the amount of his insurance deductible and lost wages. The defendant argues he was making a right turn and hit the plaintiff only because the plaintiff wedged his car next to the truck in an unsafe position. He doesn’t think he owes the plaintiff anything.
Plus, the plaintiff says the defendant slashed her tire. She claims the defendant got her car confused with someone else he had a problem with. The plaintiff is suing for the cost of a tire replacement and lost wages. The defendant denies slashing the plaintiff’s tire but admits to slashing someone else’s tire. He doesn’t think he did it because he was drunk, so he doesn’t think he owes anything.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff brings her father to court. She says the transmission blew on her car, so she took it to her father’s shop for repairs. She says her dad has been taking forever to fix her car and it still barely works. She’s suing for her money back. The defendant argues he spent a lot of money fixing it and the plaintiff cussed him out in front of his customers. He refuses to pay.
Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to put extensions in her hair. She claims the extensions started falling out after a few hours, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues she was willing to fix the plaintiff’s hair, but now she doesn’t want to because the plaintiff started blasting her on social media.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff brings his neighbor to court. He says the defendant brought a guest over, and the guest stole the defendant’s key fob and then took the TV. He’s suing for the cost of the television. The defendant says he brought a hooker over to his apartment and the hooker also stole some of his property. He argues the plaintiff is suing the wrong guy.
Then, the plaintiff says he hired the defendant to replace the shutters on his house and paid him in full, but then he only completed half the job. He’s suing him for what he’s owed. The defendant says the plaintiff ordered shutters that were the wrong size and wanted the defendant to rehire all his workers and go back a second time to install them for free.
Plus, the plaintiff says she was parked on the street having Sunday dinner and heard a loud thunk outside. She claims the uninsured defendant backed into her car and dented it, so she’s suing her for the cost of a rental car. The defendant says she paid for the repairs, but now the greedy plaintiff is coming after her for the cost of a rental car.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend to court. He says he loaned the defendant money to help her buy a new car, but now she won’t pay it back, so he’s suing for an unpaid loan. The defendant says she doesn’t owe him anything because they had an arrangement. She’s countersuing for a designer backpack and diamond ring.
Then, the plaintiff rented a home from the defendants. He says the sprinklers never worked in the front yard and would water the sidewalk and not the grass. The plaintiff says he turned off the sprinklers because he didn’t want to waste water, but now the defendants won’t return his security deposit, so he’s suing. The defendants argue the plaintiff was responsible for the lawn and he never complained, so they don’t owe him.
Plus, the plaintiff was rear-ended by the defendant while waiting at a red light. He claims his truck is destroyed and he lost sleep because of his back pain. He’s suing for loss of sleep. The defendant argues the plaintiff cut him off illegally, and he doesn’t think he owes anything.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff brings his upstairs neighbor to court. He claims the neighbor used dish soap in the dishwasher, which caused a leak. The plaintiff says his electronic devices were ruined because of it, so he’s suing. The defendant admits he caused a leak but doesn’t want to pay because the plaintiff won’t show any examples of his damaged electronics.
Then, the plaintiff went on a first date with the defendant. He says the defendant got drunk and got in the plaintiff’s car and crashed it. The car also hit an electric bike and wrecked it. He’s suing for car damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff let her drive the truck, but they were both drinking. She claims she never damaged his car because she just tapped the bike.
Plus, the plaintiff and her boyfriend were looking to move into an apartment and the defendant was the broker. They signed the lease, but then she learned she would have to watch her mom’s dog, so she had to back out of the lease because of the apartment’s no-pet policy. She says the landlord gave her the money back, but the defendant refuses to return his commission, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the landlord told her about the no-pet policy a week before they were supposed to move in. He refuses to pay her back.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff hired the attorney, her good friend, to add her children’s names to the deed of her house. She says the defendant took forever to do it, but when she spoke with another attorney, they told her not to do that. She tried getting the deed changed, but now the defendant won’t give her a refund. The defendant argues he did a lot for her and has earned all the money she paid him.
Then, the plaintiff brought her car to the defendant’s shop. He got a new alternator installed in her car, but the car problems persisted. She went back to the shop, and the defendant apparently said he would refund her. Now, he won’t give her the money back, so she’s suing. The defendant argues he already refunded the down payment.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend and mother of his child to court. The defendant put a car in her name, but the plaintiff says he paid for it and the defendant knows it’s his vehicle. He claims the defendant borrowed the car and refuses to return it, so he’s suing. The defendant argues she put money down on the car and she doesn’t owe him. She claims the plaintiff will do anything to ruin her life, and she’s countersuing for car toll late fees.
Then, the plaintiff paid the defendant to install a new skylight in his house. He claims the defendant took his money and ran. Now, he has a huge hole in his roof and squirrels keep coming in his house. He’s suing for his deposit back and extermination fees. The defendant argues the skylight company went out of business, and he sealed the roof.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff and defendant dated for several years. He loaned her money to help her pay for car insurance, but then she broke up with him a month later. He says the defendant won’t pay him back, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff cheated on him. She thinks the plaintiff is just mad at her, and she doesn’t owe him.
Then, the plaintiff and his girlfriend rented an apartment from the defendant. He told the defendant they were moving out, but now the defendant won’t return his security deposit. He’s suing to get his money back. The defendant argues the plaintiff disappeared and left the apartment a complete mess. He says he’s owed money, so he’s countersuing for the balance of the repairs, harassment, and emotional distress.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff applied for an apartment and paid a deposit fee. She changed her mind about the apartment, but the defendant won’t give the plaintiff her money back, so she’s suing. The defendant doesn’t think he owes her anything.
Then, the plaintiff brought his car to the defendant’s car because it wouldn’t start. He got the car back, but the problem persisted. He took his car to another repair shop, and that repairman said the first shop never fixed the actual problem. He’s suing for a refund. The defendant is countersuing for money he accidentally refunded.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff was tricked into buying furniture, including a couch, from the defendant. She claims the items never got delivered, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues the plaintiff got too impatient even though he told her the manufacturers deal with delays. He’s countersuing for defamation.
Then, the plaintiff dated the defendant, and he loaned her money for a trip and to help pay for her electricity bills. He claims that when he asked for his money, she blocked him on all platforms. He’s suing for what he’s owed. The defendant argues he only started arguing with her about the money after they broke up.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff brings his mom to court. He says the defendant called the police to conduct a welfare check on him, and they broke the door and lock. He’s suing for the cost of repairs. The defendant argues her son’s grandmother was worried about him because no one heard from him for several months. She doesn’t think she’s responsible because the cops broke the door, and she is just a concerned mother.
The plaintiff loaned her boyfriend’s brother money so he could buy Christmas presents. The defendant still hasn’t paid her back after three years, so she’s suing. The defendant argues he gave the money to his brother.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff claims the defendant's dog attacked hers, so she's suing for vet bills. The defendant feels bad about what happened, but the plaintiff's dog wasn't leashed at the time.
Then, the plaintiff brings his ex-girlfriend to court. The plaintiff claims the defendant threw out his clothes and PlayStation, so he's suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff was a freeloader who never paid rent when they lived together. She tossed his stuff out because she couldn't stand to see it. The defendant believes they're even because of all the money the defendant owes her.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff paid to rent the defendant's cosmetology license so she could open a beauty bar. The defendant was supposed to register her business, but she didn't, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant claims she was offered a manager position at the plaintiff's shop, but it never happened because the plaintiff didn't have her business properly registered. The defendant is countersuing for lost wages
Then, the plaintiff brings her former tenant to court for an unpaid water bill she's suing him for. The defendant admits he was struggling financially at the time, but the plaintiff already took the water bill out of his security, so he doesn't owe her. The defendant is countersuing for the remaining balance on his security deposit.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff took his car to the defendant's repair shop for new tires. The rear tire flew off shortly after, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff requested rims that were too big for his vehicle, so the defendant doesn't feel he's responsible for the damages.
The plaintiff claims the defendant illegally towed his vehicle, and he's suing for the value of the car. The defendant says he was called by the plaintiff's leasing office because the vehicle was parked in someone else's spot. Unfortunately, the car was sent to auction because the plaintiff didn't pay the fee to get it out, but that's not the defendant's fault.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff hired the defendant to install some new carpeting in his house. The plaintiff asked for some free leftover carpet to create some mats, but when he went to pick it up, the defendant charged him. The plaintiff also claims the carpeting has faded, so he's suing. The defendant argues it took him a lot of money and time to find the leftover carpet pieces. Additionally, the defendant insists the carpeting is not faded, and this lawsuit is meritless.
The plaintiff loaned the defendant money to pay rent, but he hasn't yet paid it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the loan was a gift, and the plaintiff is only turning it into a loan because he's obsessed with him or something. The defendant is countersuing for lost work.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff built two composting receptacles on the defendant's property. However, the defendant failed to pay the plaintiff and threw away some of his tools, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff built the composting receptacles for the community and just used her property as a storage area. The defendant is countersuing for the cost to fix the damages to the side of her house.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff secured a rental van on her credit card for the defendant, her cousin, when they were on vacation. The defendant failed to pay it back, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant argues the trip was a disaster because the plaintiff invited a strange man and caused damage to the rental car. The defendant insists the plaintiff is just trying to tack on the costs to her.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices - Montre plus
