エピソード
-
Welcome to the final episode of our new podcast mini-series, where Ashurst's trainees and junior associates share the influences and factors that have guided them in their careers in commercial law.
In this episode of the series, trainee’s Khadija Patel and Nick Hwong bring a host of insights and tips to help those considering a career in commercial law navigate their way through the competitive world of legal training applications.
Nick and Khadija share practical takeaways that include how to craft an impressive application, tips on how to ace your interviews and general advice on the importance of preparing your application to stand out in the crowd.
"Preparation is key. Tailor your application to highlight your unique strengths, and approach every interview as an opportunity to showcase your genuine passion for law." - Khadija Patel.
Join us for insightful conversations that shed light on the personal and professional paths of our trainees. Whether you're considering a career in law or just curious about the experiences of our talented team, this series is for you.
For more episodes in our trainee mini-series subscribe to Ashurst's Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
Digital companies operate globally which means they need to carefully navigate the new EU and UK digital markets regimes. In this episode, we highlight some of the key similarities and differences between the two regimes.
In Europe and the UK, the regulatory landscape is shifting for Big Tech. In this episode, we compare and contrast the EU Digital Markets Act and the UK Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act – and highlight the implications for multinational tech giants and the broader digital economy.
To do so, we have assembled a crack team of legal experts including Rafael Baena from Ashurst’s Madrid office, and Fiona Garside, Chris Eberhardt and Hayden Dunnett from Ashurst’s London office. Together, they consider the thresholds for designating companies under the two regimes, as well as the differing timelines, obligations and guidance in each jurisdiction. Recent developments and ongoing enforcement action are also discussed.
To listen to our previous episodes on digital markets regulation, search for ‘Ashurst Legal Outlook’ on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. And to ensure you don’t miss our future episodes, make sure you subscribe too.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
エピソードを見逃しましたか？
-
Welcome to the third episode of our podcast mini-series, where Ashurst's trainees and junior associates share the influences and factors that have guided them in their careers in commercial law.
In this third episode of the series, final seat trainee Saba Nasrolahi share her insights and personal experiences applying the crucial skill of commercial awareness in both her application and early career work experience at Ashurst.
Saba shares her journey from studying law at King's College London to her decision to join Ashurst as a trainee. She details what commercial awareness is and why it’s essential for a career in law and provides practical tips on how to develop it organically. Saba provides actionable advice for aspiring trainees, emphasising the importance of following your interests, staying updated with industry developments, and continuously building your knowledge.
Along the way Saba shares personal anecdotes about applying commercial awareness in real-world scenarios, from the virtual execution process in banking transactions to navigating businesses through political disruptions.
"Commercial awareness is … not necessarily a knowledge and expertise of the ins and outs of each part of the law or each sector. It's about understanding how businesses work and what might be impacting businesses.”
Join us for insightful conversations that shed light on the personal and professional paths of our trainees. Whether you're considering a career in law or just curious about the experiences of our talented team, this series is for you.
For more episodes in our trainee mini-series subscribe to Ashurst's Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
Welcome to the next episode in our trainee mini-series, where Ashurst's trainees and junior associates share the influences and factors that have guided them in their careers in commercial law.
In this episode of our trainee miniseries, Junior Associates Aoife Weir and Divya Deivanayagam share their enriching experiences of international and client trainee secondments. Aoife and Divya explain the secondment process from their respective secondments, with Aoife working at BP in the gas and low carbon energy team, and Divya experiencing life in Ashurst’s Tokyo office. They discuss the application process, the support they received from Ashurst, and how these opportunities enhanced their professional growth.
Divya provides a glimpse into her international secondment in Tokyo, highlighting the cultural differences, increased responsibilities, and the logistical support provided by Ashurst, making the transition smooth and enriching. While Aoife recounts her client secondment at BP, and the development of her commercial awareness, the valuable relationships she built within the organisation, and the importance of timing and clarity of intent when applying for secondments.
"Timing is everything. If you know where you want to qualify and a secondment opportunity comes up, I would just say go for it. It's one of the best experiences I've taken on professionally to date." Aoife Weir.
Join us for insightful conversations that shed light on the personal and professional paths of our trainees. Whether you're considering a career in law or just curious about the experiences of our talented team, this series is for you.
For more episodes in our trainee mini-series subscribe to Ashurst's Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act recently received Royal Assent. So what should businesses be doing to stay informed of the Act’s rollout as the Competition and Markets Authority begins its enforcement?
Fiona Garside, Chris Eberhardt, and Hayden Dunnett of Ashurst’s UK based Antitrust, Regulation and Foreign Investment Team delve into the three main pillars of the newly enacted Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act which promises significant regulatory changes. See our May 2024 update.
The team dissects how the new digital markets regime allows the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to designate firms with strategic market status (SMS), in order to impose bespoke conduct requirements and pro-competition intervention orders. The discussion highlights that the CMA's draft guidance leaves significant questions about how the CMA will exercise its broad powers, particularly in relation to conduct requirements and pro-competition interventions.
The team also consider the CMA's draft statement of policy on administrative penalties which proposes to apply an "in the round approach" to penalties for breaches of orders and undertakings following merger and market investigations. See our July 2024 update.
To listen to more Legal Outlook episodes, including past episodes of the Digital Markets Competition and Consumer Law Act, search for Ashurst Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
Welcome to our brand-new podcast mini-series where Ashurst's trainees and junior associates share the influences and factors that have guided them on their career journeys.
In our debut episode trainee Tom Segev shares his journey to joining Ashurts’s trainee program, from studying history at the University of Warwick to working at a music label, Tom details his decision-making process between pursuing music law and commercial law, and along the way highlights how he navigated these choices.
Tom also details the importance of networking and how engaging with current trainees offered him invaluable insights into the culture at Ashurst, and shares his standout moments so far, reflecting on the significant responsibilities he was entrusted with early in his training, which have contributed to his rapid professional growth.
And his advice to future trainees? "Talk to people. Talk to as many people as you can. It's the best way to learn."
Join us for insightful conversations that shed light on the personal and professional paths of our trainees. Whether you're considering a career in law or just curious about the experiences of our talented team, this series is for you.
For more episodes in our trainee mini-series subscribe to Ashurst's Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
Ashurst tax experts explore Labour’s new tax landscape following their recent UK election victory.
In the aftermath of Labour’s historic UK election victory, tax experts Patricia Allen, Alastair Ladkin and Sophie Lloyd shed light on some of the key tax measures likely to affect fund managers and when they are likely to be introduced during Labour’s 1st term in office.
Together the team discuss the need for non-domiciled individuals and fund managers to consider their personal circumstances and seek professional advice due to the potential tax changes which include replacing non-dom status with a new residence-based regime and taxing carried interest at income tax rates. There is a lack of detail surrounding these announcements, and therefore the discussion considers some of the possible ways these changes could be made.
This is the second episode in the Tax Lyrical mini-series tackling key tax issues. To listen to this episode and subscribe to future episodes, search for “Ashurst Legal Outlook” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
The latest episode of our mini-series on regulatory enforcement weighs up the pros and cons of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime – and pinpoints how to improve it.
In this podcast mini-series, we highlight new approaches from UK financial regulators and discuss what they might do differently to ensure that they act both fairly and effectively. For this episode, we delve into the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR).
Together, Ashurst colleagues Nathan Willmott, Lorraine Johnston and Adam Jamieson acknowledge the positive cultural impact that the regime has had within firms, including clearer accountability and more engagement from the top down.
The trio also unpicks some of the more challenging aspects of the regime, including the spread of requirements in both PRA and FCA Handbooks, the ‘one strike and you’re out’ approach which emanates from regulatory references, and the difficulty of measuring whether or not conduct has actually improved.
They also identify improvements to the SMCR that could clear up confusion, reduce unnecessary red tape, and make the regime more equitable. To listen to this episode – and previous episodes in this regulatory enforcement mini-series – search for “Ashurst Legal Outlook” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
This episode answers many of the most pressing Pillar Two questions that investment fund managers are asking.
As investment fund managers grapple with the potential impacts of Pillar Two legislation, a select group of Ashurst’s tax experts have compiled this podcast to demystify the details.
Adnand Sulejmani offers a brief overview of the Pillar Two legislation, its original intent and how it is enforced in Luxembourg. He also explains how to determine whether an investment fund falls within the scope of Pillar Two, including potential exemptions that exist. Alexandra Clouté explores what implications Pillar Two has for widely held and closely held Luxembourg investment funds. She also emphasises that, whatever scenario a fund finds itself in, it’s vital that fund managers perform due diligence and verify the consolidation status with investors to ensure that there are no unforeseen issues.
Patricia Allen points out that Pillar Two is more likely to apply for single investor funds or segregated mandates, and Alastair Ladkin explains how fund managers are already responding, including: making investors aware of Pillar Two, sourcing information to determine how Pillar Two applies, and deciding how to treat Pillar Two costs.
This is the first in a mini-series of episodes tackling tax issues and investment funds. To listen to this episode and subscribe to future episodes, search for “Ashurst Legal Outlook” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
The latest episode of our mini-series on regulatory enforcement considers the impact of the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s new rules that seek to prevent greenwashing.
Failing to comply with the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) new anti-greenwashing rules could have serious consequences for financial services firms in the UK. In this episode, we summarise the main changes and tackle the most pressing questions that firms are asking right now, including:
Why have these changes been introduced and how do these add to the FCA’s enforcement arsenal? What areas do (and don’t) the rules cover? When will the rules come into force, how will they work in practice, and how might firms feel the impact of these? How does the FCA’s guidance clarify what is considered “clear, fair and not misleading”? And what difference could the changes make to firms’ marketing communications? How do the FCA’s changes impact firms’ ongoing compliance work in relation to climate-related financial disclosures? What further amendments could the FCA introduce to make the rules more effective?Answering all these questions, and more, are Ashurst colleagues Nathan Willmott, Lorraine Johnson and Anna Varga. To listen to this – and previous episodes in this regulatory enforcement mini-series – search for “Ashurst Legal Outlook” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
In our continuing mini-series on regulatory enforcement of financial services firms, we pick out the issues and tackle the trends to watch - with this episode focusing on the UK Financial Ombudsman Service.
Welcome to our latest episode for financial services firms and their senior management. In this mini-series, we explore how regulators and authorities are conducting investigations and handling complaints, and we suggest what might be done differently to ensure the fairness and effectiveness of regulation.
In this episode, Ashurst colleagues Nathan Willmott, Adam Jamieson and Paul Ryan-Brown discuss issues and concerns around the management of Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) complaints, including the prominence of aggressive claims management companies and the significant impact of certain high-profile FOS decisions, most notably in the motor finance sector.
“What we're seeing is the ability for FOS decisions to effectively reset regulatory standards,” says Paul. “So firms have to take into account FOS decisions in their own complaint handling process.” That’s easier said than done, given how unpredictable FOS decisions can be, but Adam, Nathan and Paul share some pointers to help firms anticipate where the FOS may stand on certain issues. The trio analyse how the current Ombudsman regime works in practice and consider how it could improve its resolution of financial services complaints and decision-making in future.
To make sure you don’t miss the next episodes in this mini-series, subscribe to Ashurst Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
In this episode of our mini-series on regulatory enforcement, we reflect on how the Financial Conduct Authority is progressing under the stewardship of Therese Chambers and Steve Smart.
Welcome to episode three in our mini-series exploring new approaches from financial services regulators in the UK. In this final episode, we discuss the shift in enforcement strategies since new Therese Chambers and Steve Smart took the helm of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) last year.
Ashurst colleagues Nathan Willmott, Adam Jamieson and Andrew Sims reflect on the FCA’s more assertive approach, dubbed by Chambers as the ‘bad cop bad cop double act’.
While welcoming the regulator’s intention to speed up investigations and send strong signals to markets and consumers – Nathan, Adam and Andrew take a balanced view, acknowledging some of the downsides to the new approach too. They discuss the implications of the FCA’s focus on criminal actions and prosecutions (notably in the realm of investment fraud) and assess its ‘portfolio rebalancing’ exercise (reducing the backlog of cases and expediting the enforcement process). The conversation also covers the FCA’s targeting of areas like financial crime, market abuse, operational resilience, consumer duty enforcement action and technology.
To make sure you don’t miss the next episodes in this mini-series, subscribe to Ashurst Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
A snapshot of how employers are managing and responding to cases of workplace sexual harassment in Singapore, Indonesia, France, Spain, Germany, the UK, Australia, and Eastern Europe.
Employers across the world are stepping up their efforts to prevent, manage and respond to cases of workplace sexual harassment. While the problem is widely acknowledged, individual nations are tackling this in different ways.
Employers need a clear understanding of their reporting obligations so, in this episode, legal experts based in eight countries explain the common and contrasting ways that governments, legislators and regulators are responding. And importantly, the panel explains how employers can take robust action to prevent, manage and respond to cases of sexual harassment.
The discussion demonstrates that it is not enough for organisations to only set up policies, procedures, and training. Employers also need to proactively manage risks and should consider measures such as appointing internal ‘champions’ to share information with employees. And when allegations do arise – thorough and proper investigations should be carried out.
To listen to this – and our previous World @ Work episodes – search for “Ashurst Legal Outlook” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
In the second part of our mini-series on regulatory enforcement, we explain how the PRA’s Early Account Scheme works, and the factors firms should consider when deciding whether or not to participate.
Welcome to episode two in our mini-series exploring new approaches from financial services regulators in the UK. In this episode, we unpack details of the Early Account Scheme (EAS), which was introduced by the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) in January 2024.
Together, Ashurst colleagues Nathan Willmott, Adam Jamieson and Laura Bell explain how the voluntary scheme enables firms to provide a narrative factual account of issues when a suspected breach is flagged for investigation. Having provided this, firms may later receive a 50% discount on their financial penalty.
Laura highlights some circumstances where the EAS won’t be available and Adam explains that individuals are unlikely to opt for the EAS. On the other hand, he says firms might follow the EAS path because it provides the opportunity to take control of the narrative and present the facts in a way that they think is fair and justified. The trio also point out some of the challenges that firms may encounter during the EAS process.
To make sure you don’t miss the next episodes in this mini-series, subscribe to Ashurst Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
In the first of a new mini-series on regulatory enforcement, we tackle an issue that is prompting much debate in the UK financial services industry: the FCA’s proposal to begin publicly naming firms right at the outset of investigations.
This episode marks the beginning of a new mini-series exploring new approaches from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). In each episode, we explore concerns about how the regulators are conducting investigations and we suggest what they might do differently to ensure that they act both fairly and effectively.
In episode one, Ashurst colleagues Nathan Willmott, Adam Jamieson and Eleanor Robinson discuss the proposal for the FCA to name and shame firms at the start of investigations, focusing principally on the reactions of industry and politicians to its recent consultation. Together, the trio highlight some unintended consequences and repercussions if the FCA proceeds with this approach, including the potential undermining of consumer trust, along with the difficulties meeting its aspirations for transparency and accountability, and speculate on the likelihood of the FCA doing a u-turn on this aspect of its proposals.
The trio discuss the comments from the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee and the FCA's arguments in response.
Nathan and Adam explore the FCA's motivations for proposing the "naming and shaming" policy and consider the arguments made around consumer protection. Eleanor comments that the FCA are "in between a rock and a hard place" in trying to navigate a position which offers politicians and the public the information on ongoing investigations which they frequently seek, whilst ensuring that the FCA does not put growth and competitiveness of UK at risk through being too transparent about who it is investigating. Adam comments, "I do think that there was a growing momentum around the time that this letter was published that actually perhaps the FCA may change their mind in relation to the proposal. Then when this landed, I think we've seen the press, lawyers, industry bodies all pushing quite hard in unison and believing, in fact, that the FCA may change its position."
To make sure you don’t miss the next episodes in this mini-series, subscribe to Ashurst Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
Insolvency adds an extra layer of complexity to disputes between construction companies and contractors. In this episode, we discuss how these may (or may not) be resolved through adjudication.
When insolvency strikes, the path to resolving conflicts between construction companies and contractors can be much harder to navigate. Adjudication is often seen as a relatively swift and inexpensive route towards resolution – but it does carry some limitations, uncertainty, and risks.
In this episode, Ashurst colleagues Tom Duncan, Dyfan Owen and Stefan Jammes provide a brief overview of adjudication by an insolvent party, and adjudication against an insolvent party. Dyfan explains the challenges posed by insolvency set-off provisions, which have raised doubts about the efficacy of adjudication for insolvent companies. And he discusses the landmark UK Supreme Court case, Bresco v Lonsdale (2020), which affirmed the right of insolvent companies to adjudicate disputes.
Stefan and Dyfan explore the grey areas that surround the enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision in favour of insolvent parties, highlighting the stringent requirements for adequate security and the limited circumstances under which enforcement may occur. They also discuss the feasibility of adjudicating against insolvent parties and reflect on the court’s considerations when lifting the Insolvency Act’s moratorium on legal proceedings. Stefan emphasises that a balance must be struck between creditors’ interests and the insolvency process’s integrity.
To make sure you don’t miss the next episodes in this mini-series, subscribe to Ashurst Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
Join us for the second episode of our series focusing on insolvency issues in the construction sector. Tom Duncan, partner in Ashurst's construction disputes team, leads a discussion on the challenges faced by downstream contractors and strategies for mitigating risks in today's turbulent market.
In this episode, Tom Duncan is joined by Ben Patton, a partner in Ashurst's construction team specialising in real estate development and investment, and Sadia McEvoy, counsel in the same team. Together, they delve into the complexities of downstream contractor insolvencies and the implications for employers and funders.
With the construction sector grappling with unprecedented challenges, including rising insolvency rates, escalating material prices, and a slowdown in public project delivery, navigating insolvency issues has become more critical than ever. Tom, Ben, and Sadia explore the underlying factors contributing to contractor insolvencies and provide valuable insights into mitigating risks in today's challenging environment.
From understanding the triggers for termination in construction contracts to exploring the nuances of step-in rights and performance guarantees, this episode offers practical guidance for stakeholders in the construction industry. Whether you're a developer, funder, or contractor, this discussion sheds light on effective strategies for safeguarding your interests amidst increasing insolvency risks.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
In this episode, we discuss the legal risks and commercial difficulties for construction contractors who supply services to a company that enters insolvency.
Geopolitical turmoil. Inflation. Brexit. A pandemic. Conditions were already complicated enough for contractors before the current spate of insolvencies among UK construction companies. In this episode, we explore the legal and commercial ramifications for contractors who supply services to companies that face insolvency.
Ashurst colleagues Tom Duncan, Ru-Woei Foong and Inga West discuss the meaning of “ipso facto” in an insolvency context and, in particular, UK laws which restrict a supplier of goods or services to a company from terminating supply when the company goes into insolvency. They also explain how and when a contractor can protect their position and pursue outstanding payments, and they discuss circumstances that could enable a supplier to terminate the contract.
The trio emphasise the importance of contractors engaging early with insolvency practitioners to clarify their position and weigh up their options. And they discuss the Building Safety Act and potential liability in relation to developers and their holding structures – a particularly acute challenge with older or more mature developments.
To make sure you don’t miss the next episodes in this mini-series, subscribe to Ashurst Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
In the last episode of this mini-series, the team discuss what the greatest enforcement threats have been across the globe over the past 12 months and what is likely to be the emerging areas of risk corporates must look out for in 2024.
In this last installment in our Corporate Crime and Investigations Series, our international panel of experts, led by Ashurst host Ruby Hamid, dissected the most significant enforcement threats that have shaped the global corporate landscape over the past 12 months.
From the Netherlands, we heard from Marianne Bloos from the Dutch firm Houthoff, KS Shin brought insights from Korea, Tristan Bramble talks through the U.S experience while Dr Eleanor Robinson shares the UK perspective.
The discussion examines the key questions, including, the greatest enforcement threats for corporates worldwide. Expectations of authorities in various jurisdictions regarding corporates conducting their own internal investigations and self-reporting, and what enforcement risks should corporates be vigilant about as we venture into 2024?
Whether you were a compliance professional, legal expert, or simply interested in staying ahead of the curve in regards to corporate enforcement trends, this episode promises valuable insights, recent case studies, regulatory developments, and emerging trends to provide you with a comprehensive understanding of the global enforcement landscape.
To stay informed and catch-up on our corporate crime and investigations mini-series subscribe to Ashurst Legal Outlook on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
-
Ashurst colleagues Joe Perry-Courtade, Kim Clifford and Alison Hardy provide a snapshot of the trends that will shape the world of real estate disputes this year.
In this episode, we take you on a whistle stop tour of the real estate dispute issues that are set to dominate headlines in 2024. In just 13 minutes, Ashurst’s Joe Perry-Courtade, Kim Clifford and Alison Hardy cover everything from tenant insolvencies and development disputes, to commercial energy efficiency and upcoming reforms of the Landlord and Tenant Act.
The trio begin by discussing rising tenant insolvencies (notably in retail, accommodation, and food) before tackling development disputes and the challenges faced by the construction sector (exacerbated by supply chain issues and escalations in costs, interest rates and inflation).
Next, they discuss the mooted reforms of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, tackling issues such as security of tenure, notices, and renewal lease terms. The episode wraps up with commercial energy efficiency including the shifting compliance timelines and the risks of stranded assets for landlords who fall short of the new regulations.
To make sure you don’t miss any episodes of Ashurst Legal Outlook in 2024, subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to. Listeners should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
- もっと表示する
