エピソード
-
In the current phase of the Ukraine-Russia war, infantry operations are extremely grueling and deadly—especially for Ukrainian forces. Ukrainian troops often hike long distances to reach frontline positions, choosing dawn, dusk, or bad weather to reduce exposure, but even then the journey and logistics like casualty evacuation are highly dangerous.
On the Russian side, they continue launching mass assaults using "expendable" infantry, often on motorbikes, but suffer high losses. Ukrainian drone teams and artillery often eliminate entire Russian assault units before they reach the "zero line." However, if Russian forces do reach entrenched positions, it becomes hard for Ukraine to dislodge them due to thinly spread infantry.
There’s a tactical and technological arms race between both sides: Ukraine often innovates, but Russia quickly copies and scales new tactics. One example is fiber-optic drones, where Russia had the early advantage.
Regarding artillery, its primacy has declined, replaced in large part by drone warfare, especially FPV (First-Person View) strike drones. Artillery still plays a role—especially in difficult terrain—but drones now cause the majority of frontline wounds. For example, recent field hospitals report that 90% of injuries come from drones rather than artillery, a reversal from even a year ago.
Manpower is Ukraine’s biggest strategic weakness. Russia has a much larger population and a seemingly endless supply of infantry. Ukraine, however, struggles to replenish combat-effective troops, especially infantry. Ukrainian infantry now spend weeks in exposed frontline positions because even the trip back is too dangerous. These conditions are more miserable than World War I trench warfare, with even bathroom breaks proving deadly due to drone surveillance.
Meanwhile, Russian forces, though still taking heavy casualties, have more numerical flexibility and increasingly use sacrificial assault tactics. Ukrainian infantry, in contrast, are often stuck holding increasingly thin lines, with no realistic rotation or relief. The saturation of drones and the infantry imbalance together define the brutal current state of the war.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker critiques Western narratives, particularly those from figures like Senator Lindsey Graham, about Russia’s intentions in Ukraine and the broader post-Soviet space. Key points include:
Media and Narrative Critique
The channel claims to present full context and direct quotes from global actors rather than using misleading soundbites.
Criticizes mainstream figures for claiming, without evidence, that Putin seeks to "reconquer the Soviet Union."
Asserts Putin has consistently stated his key goal is security on Russia's western flank, not empire restoration.
Putin’s Stated Goals
Security concerns: Opposition to NATO presence near Russian borders.
Consistent demands: Since 2015, Putin emphasized implementing the Minsk Accords to protect ethnic Russians in Ukraine.
2015 to 2024 evolution: Russia’s demands have increased—from just Crimea to now potentially 5–8 Ukrainian regions—as Western responses remained defiant or dismissive.
Claims Russia offered multiple diplomatic solutions (e.g., Dec 2021 proposal) that were ignored or rejected.
Russia's Military Buildup
Significant increase in Russia’s production of tanks, APCs, artillery, drones, and munitions.
New bases being constructed on the western (NATO-facing) flank.
Western actions (e.g., arming Ukraine) are presented as justification for this buildup.
Western Weakness and Strategic Failure
Accuses NATO and the U.S. of depleting their own stockpiles by arming Ukraine.
Claims Russia is now militarily stronger than at the war’s onset in Feb 2022, despite its own losses.
Suggests Western policy has inadvertently strengthened Russia and weakened NATO industrial and defense capacities.
Frontline Military Update
Russian forces are actively advancing in multiple sectors across eastern and southern Ukraine.
Gray zones indicate recent Russian advances; some Ukrainian forces risk encirclement.
Russia appears to bypass strongholds rather than directly assault them, aiming to isolate and envelop Ukrainian positions.
Russia has nearly repelled recent Ukrainian incursions into Russian territory and is continuing to push southward in Sumy and other fronts.
Ukrainian defensive lines are reportedly being broken, with Russian forces nearing operational depth near cities and forest belts.
Conclusion
The speaker argues the West is mischaracterizing Russia’s aims and failing to adapt to changing realities.
Warns against continued escalation and arms transfers to Ukraine without a coherent strategy or industrial replenishment.
Suggests future commentary will address calls for Ukrainian NATO membership—still being made despite escalating risks.
See Tulsi Gabbard's video:
I recently visited Hiroshima, and stood at the epicenter of a city scarred by the unimaginable horror caused by a single nuclear bomb dropped in 1945. What I saw, the stories I heard, and the haunting sadness that remains, will stay with me forever.
https://x.com/TulsiGabbard/status/193...Transcript
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
エピソードを見逃しましたか？
-
The speaker argues that the United States is suffering the consequences of arrogance and delusional thinking in its approach to the Russia-Ukraine war. They criticize both Republican and Democratic leaders—particularly Congressman Steny Hoyer—for advocating continued U.S. support under the guise of “democracy” and “freedom,” accusing them of pushing a reckless agenda that ignores the actual balance of power and risks nuclear conflict.
The speaker emphasizes that:
The U.S. underestimated Russia’s resilience and overestimated the effectiveness of Western aid.
Russia has weathered Western weapons shipments and is now advancing steadily.
Calls for more action (e.g., boots on the ground) are not only foolish but could lead to nuclear war, which is considered inevitable if NATO troops directly engage Russian forces.
Instead of questioning American “stomach” or resolve, leaders should ask if they have the wisdom to avoid a war that can't be won.
They advocate:
Immediate withdrawal of U.S. support.
Letting Ukraine and Europe come to terms with their limited capacity without America.
Accepting geopolitical reality rather than pursuing fantasy goals.
The speaker concludes by urging Donald Trump to end U.S. involvement immediately for America’s safety and national interest, warning that otherwise the U.S. faces either defeat or nuclear escalation.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
In a recent appearance on the New York Post's new podcast Pod Force One, President Donald Trump expressed declining confidence in reaching a diplomatic deal with Iran. He suggested that delays and changes in circumstances over the past two months have made him pessimistic, hinting that if diplomacy fails, military action could be a last resort.
The commentator warns that such action would be unconstitutional without Congressional approval, citing the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Act of 1973, which limit the president’s authority to launch military attacks unless the U.S. is directly attacked or Congress authorizes it.
The discussion criticizes the idea of attacking Iran, emphasizing that:
Iran does not currently have nuclear weapons and claims not to be pursuing them.
The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) confirmed no evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program.
While Iran has increased uranium enrichment to 60%, this is still below weapons-grade (90%).
Any attack would not only be unlawful but also unnecessary and counterproductive.
The speaker also underscores that Iran is not an imminent threat to the U.S., arguing its actions are driven by regime survival, not aggression. The real pressure, they claim, is coming from Israel, which sees Iran as a threat and has taken repeated aggressive actions against it. However, the U.S. should not be drawn into conflict on Israel’s behalf.
Trump's earlier rhetoric in March and April 2025 indicated he was nearing a decision—possibly peace or war. His envoy, Steve Witkoff, had optimistic meetings with Iranian representatives, and talks focused on limiting uranium enrichment. However, recent developments appear to have stalled progress, reviving Trump's hawkish tone.
In conclusion, the commentary urges restraint, constitutional adherence, and avoiding unnecessary conflict, noting that Iran lacks the military-industrial capacity to sustain a war and does not want one.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
discussion centers on a provocative article claiming Russia has effectively won the war in Ukraine and NATO can't stop it, with former U.S. military advisor Col. Douglas Macgregor largely agreeing.
Key points:
Russia's Slow Advance Was Intentional: Macgregor argues that Putin has deliberately avoided full-scale aggression to prevent escalating into direct conflict with NATO or the U.S. He believes Putin still wants post-war diplomatic and economic relations with the West.
NATO’s Power Overstated: The guest and the article assert that NATO would lose in a direct war with Russia, despite NATO’s public statements to the contrary.
Shift in Russian Strategy: Following Ukrainian attacks on Russian military and civilian infrastructure, Russia has intensified airstrikes. There's speculation Putin may officially escalate the conflict from a “Special Military Operation” (SMO) to a “Counterterrorist Operation” (CTO), which under Russian law could justify targeting Ukrainian leadership.
Zelensky Seen as a Barrier to Peace: Macgregor characterizes President Zelensky as irrational, detached from reality, and uninterested in peace—accusing him of prolonging the war for personal gain.
Western Media Criticized: U.S. media, especially ABC News, is accused of failing to challenge Zelensky’s claims and promoting a pro-war narrative.
Call for Russian Decisiveness: Macgregor suggests the war will only end when Russian forces take Kyiv and remove Zelensky’s government. He believes the U.S. and Europe are not in a position to respond militarily, so Putin should act decisively now.
Overall Message: According to Macgregor and the article's author, Russia has strategically outmaneuvered Ukraine and NATO, and unless there's a dramatic change—like Russian troops taking Kyiv—the war will drag on needlessly.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The conversation critiques Western misunderstandings of modern military operations and operational planning, especially in the context of the Russia-Ukraine war. Key points include:
Combat Effectiveness Misunderstood: Western commentators, particularly those without military experience, misinterpret military retreats (like Ukraine’s) as tactical when in reality they signify losing ground to a better-equipped adversary.
Modern Warfare Misconceptions: The idea that drones dominate modern war is rejected. Traditional heavy artillery, such as battalions of self-propelled guns, still inflict far greater destruction. Drone strikes are limited in scope compared to massed artillery fire.
Operational Planning Requires Integration: There is no "wonder weapon." Victory comes from the coordinated use of multiple military systems—drones, artillery, electronic warfare, logistics—not from isolated technologies.
Media and Political Narrative Failures: Many in Western media and politics push a narrative disconnected from battlefield realities, often to serve political aims (e.g., propping up a side despite military disadvantages).
Russian Strategy and Restraint: Russia is portrayed as operationally and strategically advanced, evolving since 2022. Despite provocations (e.g., British involvement in Ukrainian strikes), Russia exercises restraint to maintain legitimacy with the Global South and avoid escalation.
Zelensky and Western Leadership Misread Putin: Zelensky claims Putin doesn’t want peace, but critics argue Putin is simply not willing to stop while holding a military advantage. Stopping now would forfeit that edge.
Broader Implications: The discussion warns that if roles were reversed—say Russia supporting an enemy during a U.S. war—the U.S. would not show the same restraint. Yet Russia, being “judicial” and strategic, avoids overt retaliation to maintain global diplomatic leverage.
In essence, the segment argues that real-world military planning and effectiveness are being poorly understood in the West, with consequences for both battlefield success and geopolitical narratives.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Trump, responding to violent protests in Los Angeles following a controversial ICE raid on June 6, stated he may invoke the Insurrection Act, depending on the situation. The raid—particularly at a downtown LA Home Depot—sparked outrage due to the heavily militarized appearance of ICE agents, resembling combat troops, which escalated public fear and unrest.
While Trump emphasized law and order, he acknowledged the need for careful enforcement that doesn't fuel further chaos. The protests highlight underlying social fractures and have intensified federal vs. state tensions, particularly between Washington and California.
On June 7, Trump issued an executive order deploying 2,000 National Guard troops under federal authority for up to 60 days, signaling a serious federal intervention. The situation reflects deep divides over immigration enforcement, public safety, and the appropriate use of federal power in local conflicts.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
The war between Russia and Ukraine is intensifying, growing more violent and escalating rather than moving toward peace. A recent Ukrainian drone strike deep inside Russia damaged bomber bases, but this has provoked a major retaliatory response: Russia launched over 400 drones and missiles, overwhelming Ukraine’s air defenses. Many of these were advanced Iranian-made drones now upgraded by Russia, making them harder to intercept. Ukrainian forces reportedly intercepted only about half the attacks, and even Patriot systems were either ineffective or destroyed.
Footage shows multiple successful Russian missile strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure, with minimal air defense response in cities like Lviv, Luts’k, and Kyiv. A key Patriot battery was hit after firing multiple interceptors, underscoring the diminishing effectiveness and availability of Ukraine's defense systems. U.S. officials have stated no more Patriot systems are available to send, and European allies are reluctant to share theirs.
On the ground, Russian forces continue to advance across several fronts while Ukraine’s counterattacks gain minimal territory. Meanwhile, Ukrainian leadership and supporters publicly celebrated the drone strike on Russia—seen by the commentator as a “one-off” success that is unlikely to be repeated due to increased Russian security and vigilance.
The overall message is grim: Ukraine’s strategic position is deteriorating, its defenses are being depleted, and the West appears unwilling or unable to provide the necessary support to reverse the trend. The war is not winding down—it is accelerating in a direction unfavorable to Ukraine.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The discussion centers on the expected Russian retaliation following a recent Ukrainian drone strike targeting Russia’s bomber fleet. There is anticipation over what Putin’s next move will be, especially given increasing tensions and recent statements from both the Kremlin and the White House.
Trump acknowledged in a recent call that Putin was hit hard and is likely to respond but made no mention of deterring him. Analysts note that while Russia tends to respond in a calculated, consistent manner, the U.S.—and Trump in particular—has been inconsistent, oscillating between calls for de-escalation and threats of strong retaliation.
The drone attack is compared to past Ukrainian strikes, including one that hit a Russian nuclear early-warning radar system, which had derailed diplomatic talks at the time. The current strike’s timing, just ahead of an international summit, is seen as similarly provocative.
Commentators suggest the U.S. may be covertly supporting such actions while maintaining public distance, possibly using allies like the UK for plausible deniability. Meanwhile, voices like Gen. Jack Keane urge Trump to revert to Biden-era levels of military support to ensure Russia "can't win."
Overall, the discussion reveals a complex, fragmented strategy from the West, with conflicting messages and policy drift from Washington, while Russia is expected to retaliate in its typical methodical style—potentially escalating the conflict further.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker harshly criticizes a U.S. general for what they see as delusional takes on American military success, citing failures in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. They argue that the Soviet Union (not the U.S.) was primarily responsible for defeating Nazi Germany, inflicting 80% of German military casualties. The speaker accuses the general—and others like Lindsey Graham and Ben Hodges—of living in a dangerous fantasy that costs lives.
The discussion shifts to Donald Trump’s recent Truth Social post claiming he had a long call with Vladimir Putin. Trump emphasized Putin’s plan to respond to recent Ukrainian attacks on Russian airbases. The speaker suggests that Trump’s silence prior to the post was due to a stern message relayed by Russian officials—likely via Marco Rubio—warning that the U.S. might be blamed for the attacks. The Russians reportedly saw these strikes, particularly on strategic nuclear assets, as provocations possibly backed by the U.S.
Putin’s televised remarks labeled Ukraine a terrorist state and rejected the idea of negotiating with its leadership, citing recent attacks on high-value military targets. The speaker interprets Putin’s tone and body language as intensely angry, signaling a major escalation risk. They describe the situation as deeply personal for Putin—likened to an attack on “his family”—and predict a harsh Russian response, emphasizing that the call with Trump was likely confrontational and serious.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
'How can we negotiate with those resorting to terrorism?'
Russian president Vladimir Putin asks how any deal can be done with those funding and essentially directing terrorism.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he had a 90-minute phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, during which they discussed the Ukraine war. Putin reportedly warned Trump of a coming response to a recent Ukrainian attack on Russia’s strategic bomber force. International relations scholar John Mearsheimer reacted strongly, saying the situation is worsening on multiple fronts: Gaza, Iran, Ukraine, and East Asia. He argues the U.S. has lost control over allies and adversaries alike, and criticizes Trump for failing to resolve major global issues he once promised to fix.
Mearsheimer warns that the Ukraine conflict, especially recent Ukrainian (and potentially U.S.-supported) strikes on Russia’s nuclear infrastructure, risks dangerous escalation. He condemns the use of the term "terrorism" to describe Ukraine’s military actions, but stresses that Russia may see these as justification for serious retaliation. Given the rising desperation and anger in Moscow, he expresses growing concern that the war could eventually trigger Russian use of nuclear weapons, particularly if they feel cornered or unable to win conventionally. The overall tone is one of alarm about America's strategic direction and growing global instability.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Strategic Silence: Trump’s lack of public response is seen as a way to protect a joint operation or maintain diplomatic positioning.
Mixed Messaging: While Trump criticizes Russia for attacks, he has been silent on Ukrainian counterstrikes. His strategy seems inconsistent or unclear, possibly attempting to pressure both sides.
Desire for Peace Talks: Trump is serious about facilitating negotiations in Istanbul and is willing to be personally involved if it could help.
On Ukraine’s Position
Posturing at Talks: Ukraine's delegate Umarov made strong demands for a ceasefire and humanitarian steps—knowing full well Russia has repeatedly rejected a ceasefire-first approach.
Pressure on Trump: Some see this as Ukraine trying to force Trump away from negotiations and back into the Biden-era military support and sanctions approach.
On Russia, Sanctions, and War Dynamics
Russia Unfazed by Sanctions: Despite years of “crippling” sanctions, Russia’s economy has endured, aided by trade with China, India, and others. Sanctions have failed to weaken Russia meaningfully.
Sanctions Hurt the Poor: Sanctions primarily affect the most vulnerable in the targeted nations while leadership remains insulated.
Negotiations Over Sanctions: The speaker advocates for diplomacy instead of continued reliance on ineffective sanctions.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Trump recently announced the development of a new missile defense system called the Golden Dome, modeled after Israel’s Iron Dome. He claimed it would integrate with current U.S. defenses, be operational within three years, and even intercept missiles from space or across the globe. He emphasized its importance for national survival, noting Canada might join the project.
However, Professor Ted Postol, a former MIT professor and expert in missile defense, strongly criticized the plan, calling it unrealistic and technologically unfeasible. He compared it to Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) or “Star Wars” from the 1980s, which also promised futuristic missile defense but failed due to major technical shortcomings—issues that still persist today.
Postol recounted his experience with SDI, where exaggerated claims, political enthusiasm, and poor scientific validation led to deeply flawed policy decisions. He described how untested and theoretical technologies, like the X-ray laser, were hyped up and presented as game-changers despite never working. This led to what he called a “hallucinatory” policy environment where major Pentagon decisions were driven by fantasy rather than feasibility.
The discussion warns that the Golden Dome may repeat past mistakes: overpromising unproven technology, misleading policymakers, and ultimately wasting resources on a system unlikely to perform as advertised.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The recent meeting in Istanbul between Russia and Ukraine, typically expected to move toward peace, appears to have had the opposite effect. Rather than progressing toward an end to the conflict, both sides presented proposals that made a negotiated settlement even more unlikely, signaling a continuation—and possible escalation—of the war.
Colonel Douglas Macgregor argues that:
The summit was a charade: He believes only Russia is serious about ending the war, while Ukraine’s leadership is entrenched in denial and pursuing unattainable goals.
Ukraine's military is collapsing: Citing massive casualties (upwards of 1.5 million dead) and recent resignations from high-ranking Ukrainian military officials, Macgregor contends that Ukrainian forces are on the verge of collapse.
Zelensky's strategy is to drag in the U.S. militarily: Like Netanyahu in Israel, Zelensky is not seeking peace but rather trying to provoke deeper American military involvement by painting a narrative of strength and momentum.
Drone attacks inside Russia (e.g., Operation Spiderweb) are described as symbolic and aided by U.S. and UK intelligence, but militarily insignificant.
Zelensky’s demands (Russia gets nothing, no territorial concessions) are viewed as delusional and designed to make peace talks impossible.
The West, particularly Washington, is focused on optics: The real strategy is shaping perceptions to keep support flowing, even if the reality on the battlefield is bleak.
In conclusion, Macgregor suggests that current diplomacy is performative and detached from battlefield realities, with the primary goal being to manipulate Western narratives and keep international support for Ukraine alive, despite the crumbling situation on the ground.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Key Points:
Ukrainian Drone Attacks:
Ukraine targeted five Russian air bases, destroying at least 13 strategic bombers (e.g., TU-95s).
Ukraine spent 18 months preparing the attack, even smuggling and assembling equipment inside Russia.
Despite media hype, the Russian military capability remains largely intact; they have ~87 strategic bombers, so operational capacity is not significantly affected.
Western Media & Zelensky's Narrative:
Zelensky claimed the operation was a major success and a turning point, pushing Russia toward diplomacy.
The speaker criticizes Western media for overstating Ukraine’s successes and underreporting Russian advances.
Satellite imagery disproved earlier Ukrainian claims that 41 Russian aircraft were destroyed.
Peace Talks & Diplomatic Reality:
Zelensky claimed Ukraine forced Russia into peace talks, but the speaker counters that Putin proposed direct talks on May 11.
Russia has long expressed interest in negotiations (dating back to 2014 and the Minsk agreements), whereas Zelensky passed a law banning negotiations with Putin.
Military Reality on the Ground:
Russia has been gaining territory steadily since October 2023.
Ukraine is losing troops and lacks the manpower and industrial capacity for a long war of attrition.
Tactical victories like "Spiderweb" have limited strategic impact if not backed by broader battlefield success.
Criticism of Western Support:
The speaker argues the West, particularly Europe and the U.S., continues to support Ukraine based on idealistic or misleading narratives, rather than hard strategic calculations.
Suggests the West should focus on its own interests, not blindly back Ukraine.
Zelensky’s European Tour:
Zelensky attended a summit in Vilnius, continuing to pitch Ukraine as the defender of Europe and highlighting the superiority of Western and Ukrainian weapons.
The speaker views this as emotional rhetoric rather than a reflection of strategic reality.
Conclusion:
The speaker urges a reality-based assessment of the war, challenging overly optimistic Ukrainian and Western claims. While Ukraine’s drone strike was tactically impressive, it does not alter the strategic trajectory of the war, in which Russia continues to advance and maintain overwhelming advantages.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Recent Strikes: Ukraine carried out strikes shortly before peace talks in Istanbul, which may provoke a harsher Russian response.
Negotiation Dynamics: Ukraine expected Russia to share its memorandum before the meeting, but Russia insists it will only share it during the talks.
Russia's Stance: Russian officials have clearly stated this may be the last chance for a diplomatic solution. If not accepted, Russia will aim to win militarily.
Power Imbalance: The speaker highlights Russia's superiority in manpower, equipment, and resources, arguing Ukraine cannot realistically win on the battlefield.
Possibility of Escalation: The speaker suggests Russia might replace the memorandum with an ultimatum and warns of the possibility of a large-scale military escalation.
Western Influence: There is speculation that some Western powers and possibly Zelensky might want to prolong the war to avoid a negotiated settlement that favors Russia, especially ahead of a potential Trump presidency.
U.S. Military Aid Limits: The U.S. has signaled it cannot continue supplying Ukraine at previous levels, contradicting any hopes for renewed heavy support.
Russian Restraint and Future Targets: Russia has seemingly held back from hitting major Ukrainian political and intelligence targets, but that may change in retaliation for the recent attacks.
Overall, the tone is critical of Ukraine and the West, portraying Russia as being methodical and serious about forcing an end to the war on its terms.Explore the podcast
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
- もっと表示する
