エピソード
-
In a recent appearance on the New York Post's new podcast Pod Force One, President Donald Trump expressed declining confidence in reaching a diplomatic deal with Iran. He suggested that delays and changes in circumstances over the past two months have made him pessimistic, hinting that if diplomacy fails, military action could be a last resort.
The commentator warns that such action would be unconstitutional without Congressional approval, citing the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Act of 1973, which limit the president’s authority to launch military attacks unless the U.S. is directly attacked or Congress authorizes it.
The discussion criticizes the idea of attacking Iran, emphasizing that:
Iran does not currently have nuclear weapons and claims not to be pursuing them.
The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) confirmed no evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program.
While Iran has increased uranium enrichment to 60%, this is still below weapons-grade (90%).
Any attack would not only be unlawful but also unnecessary and counterproductive.
The speaker also underscores that Iran is not an imminent threat to the U.S., arguing its actions are driven by regime survival, not aggression. The real pressure, they claim, is coming from Israel, which sees Iran as a threat and has taken repeated aggressive actions against it. However, the U.S. should not be drawn into conflict on Israel’s behalf.
Trump's earlier rhetoric in March and April 2025 indicated he was nearing a decision—possibly peace or war. His envoy, Steve Witkoff, had optimistic meetings with Iranian representatives, and talks focused on limiting uranium enrichment. However, recent developments appear to have stalled progress, reviving Trump's hawkish tone.
In conclusion, the commentary urges restraint, constitutional adherence, and avoiding unnecessary conflict, noting that Iran lacks the military-industrial capacity to sustain a war and does not want one.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
discussion centers on a provocative article claiming Russia has effectively won the war in Ukraine and NATO can't stop it, with former U.S. military advisor Col. Douglas Macgregor largely agreeing.
Key points:
Russia's Slow Advance Was Intentional: Macgregor argues that Putin has deliberately avoided full-scale aggression to prevent escalating into direct conflict with NATO or the U.S. He believes Putin still wants post-war diplomatic and economic relations with the West.
NATO’s Power Overstated: The guest and the article assert that NATO would lose in a direct war with Russia, despite NATO’s public statements to the contrary.
Shift in Russian Strategy: Following Ukrainian attacks on Russian military and civilian infrastructure, Russia has intensified airstrikes. There's speculation Putin may officially escalate the conflict from a “Special Military Operation” (SMO) to a “Counterterrorist Operation” (CTO), which under Russian law could justify targeting Ukrainian leadership.
Zelensky Seen as a Barrier to Peace: Macgregor characterizes President Zelensky as irrational, detached from reality, and uninterested in peace—accusing him of prolonging the war for personal gain.
Western Media Criticized: U.S. media, especially ABC News, is accused of failing to challenge Zelensky’s claims and promoting a pro-war narrative.
Call for Russian Decisiveness: Macgregor suggests the war will only end when Russian forces take Kyiv and remove Zelensky’s government. He believes the U.S. and Europe are not in a position to respond militarily, so Putin should act decisively now.
Overall Message: According to Macgregor and the article's author, Russia has strategically outmaneuvered Ukraine and NATO, and unless there's a dramatic change—like Russian troops taking Kyiv—the war will drag on needlessly.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
エピソードを見逃しましたか？
-
The conversation critiques Western misunderstandings of modern military operations and operational planning, especially in the context of the Russia-Ukraine war. Key points include:
Combat Effectiveness Misunderstood: Western commentators, particularly those without military experience, misinterpret military retreats (like Ukraine’s) as tactical when in reality they signify losing ground to a better-equipped adversary.
Modern Warfare Misconceptions: The idea that drones dominate modern war is rejected. Traditional heavy artillery, such as battalions of self-propelled guns, still inflict far greater destruction. Drone strikes are limited in scope compared to massed artillery fire.
Operational Planning Requires Integration: There is no "wonder weapon." Victory comes from the coordinated use of multiple military systems—drones, artillery, electronic warfare, logistics—not from isolated technologies.
Media and Political Narrative Failures: Many in Western media and politics push a narrative disconnected from battlefield realities, often to serve political aims (e.g., propping up a side despite military disadvantages).
Russian Strategy and Restraint: Russia is portrayed as operationally and strategically advanced, evolving since 2022. Despite provocations (e.g., British involvement in Ukrainian strikes), Russia exercises restraint to maintain legitimacy with the Global South and avoid escalation.
Zelensky and Western Leadership Misread Putin: Zelensky claims Putin doesn’t want peace, but critics argue Putin is simply not willing to stop while holding a military advantage. Stopping now would forfeit that edge.
Broader Implications: The discussion warns that if roles were reversed—say Russia supporting an enemy during a U.S. war—the U.S. would not show the same restraint. Yet Russia, being “judicial” and strategic, avoids overt retaliation to maintain global diplomatic leverage.
In essence, the segment argues that real-world military planning and effectiveness are being poorly understood in the West, with consequences for both battlefield success and geopolitical narratives.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Trump, responding to violent protests in Los Angeles following a controversial ICE raid on June 6, stated he may invoke the Insurrection Act, depending on the situation. The raid—particularly at a downtown LA Home Depot—sparked outrage due to the heavily militarized appearance of ICE agents, resembling combat troops, which escalated public fear and unrest.
While Trump emphasized law and order, he acknowledged the need for careful enforcement that doesn't fuel further chaos. The protests highlight underlying social fractures and have intensified federal vs. state tensions, particularly between Washington and California.
On June 7, Trump issued an executive order deploying 2,000 National Guard troops under federal authority for up to 60 days, signaling a serious federal intervention. The situation reflects deep divides over immigration enforcement, public safety, and the appropriate use of federal power in local conflicts.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
The war between Russia and Ukraine is intensifying, growing more violent and escalating rather than moving toward peace. A recent Ukrainian drone strike deep inside Russia damaged bomber bases, but this has provoked a major retaliatory response: Russia launched over 400 drones and missiles, overwhelming Ukraine’s air defenses. Many of these were advanced Iranian-made drones now upgraded by Russia, making them harder to intercept. Ukrainian forces reportedly intercepted only about half the attacks, and even Patriot systems were either ineffective or destroyed.
Footage shows multiple successful Russian missile strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure, with minimal air defense response in cities like Lviv, Luts’k, and Kyiv. A key Patriot battery was hit after firing multiple interceptors, underscoring the diminishing effectiveness and availability of Ukraine's defense systems. U.S. officials have stated no more Patriot systems are available to send, and European allies are reluctant to share theirs.
On the ground, Russian forces continue to advance across several fronts while Ukraine’s counterattacks gain minimal territory. Meanwhile, Ukrainian leadership and supporters publicly celebrated the drone strike on Russia—seen by the commentator as a “one-off” success that is unlikely to be repeated due to increased Russian security and vigilance.
The overall message is grim: Ukraine’s strategic position is deteriorating, its defenses are being depleted, and the West appears unwilling or unable to provide the necessary support to reverse the trend. The war is not winding down—it is accelerating in a direction unfavorable to Ukraine.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The discussion centers on the expected Russian retaliation following a recent Ukrainian drone strike targeting Russia’s bomber fleet. There is anticipation over what Putin’s next move will be, especially given increasing tensions and recent statements from both the Kremlin and the White House.
Trump acknowledged in a recent call that Putin was hit hard and is likely to respond but made no mention of deterring him. Analysts note that while Russia tends to respond in a calculated, consistent manner, the U.S.—and Trump in particular—has been inconsistent, oscillating between calls for de-escalation and threats of strong retaliation.
The drone attack is compared to past Ukrainian strikes, including one that hit a Russian nuclear early-warning radar system, which had derailed diplomatic talks at the time. The current strike’s timing, just ahead of an international summit, is seen as similarly provocative.
Commentators suggest the U.S. may be covertly supporting such actions while maintaining public distance, possibly using allies like the UK for plausible deniability. Meanwhile, voices like Gen. Jack Keane urge Trump to revert to Biden-era levels of military support to ensure Russia "can't win."
Overall, the discussion reveals a complex, fragmented strategy from the West, with conflicting messages and policy drift from Washington, while Russia is expected to retaliate in its typical methodical style—potentially escalating the conflict further.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker harshly criticizes a U.S. general for what they see as delusional takes on American military success, citing failures in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. They argue that the Soviet Union (not the U.S.) was primarily responsible for defeating Nazi Germany, inflicting 80% of German military casualties. The speaker accuses the general—and others like Lindsey Graham and Ben Hodges—of living in a dangerous fantasy that costs lives.
The discussion shifts to Donald Trump’s recent Truth Social post claiming he had a long call with Vladimir Putin. Trump emphasized Putin’s plan to respond to recent Ukrainian attacks on Russian airbases. The speaker suggests that Trump’s silence prior to the post was due to a stern message relayed by Russian officials—likely via Marco Rubio—warning that the U.S. might be blamed for the attacks. The Russians reportedly saw these strikes, particularly on strategic nuclear assets, as provocations possibly backed by the U.S.
Putin’s televised remarks labeled Ukraine a terrorist state and rejected the idea of negotiating with its leadership, citing recent attacks on high-value military targets. The speaker interprets Putin’s tone and body language as intensely angry, signaling a major escalation risk. They describe the situation as deeply personal for Putin—likened to an attack on “his family”—and predict a harsh Russian response, emphasizing that the call with Trump was likely confrontational and serious.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
'How can we negotiate with those resorting to terrorism?'
Russian president Vladimir Putin asks how any deal can be done with those funding and essentially directing terrorism.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he had a 90-minute phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, during which they discussed the Ukraine war. Putin reportedly warned Trump of a coming response to a recent Ukrainian attack on Russia’s strategic bomber force. International relations scholar John Mearsheimer reacted strongly, saying the situation is worsening on multiple fronts: Gaza, Iran, Ukraine, and East Asia. He argues the U.S. has lost control over allies and adversaries alike, and criticizes Trump for failing to resolve major global issues he once promised to fix.
Mearsheimer warns that the Ukraine conflict, especially recent Ukrainian (and potentially U.S.-supported) strikes on Russia’s nuclear infrastructure, risks dangerous escalation. He condemns the use of the term "terrorism" to describe Ukraine’s military actions, but stresses that Russia may see these as justification for serious retaliation. Given the rising desperation and anger in Moscow, he expresses growing concern that the war could eventually trigger Russian use of nuclear weapons, particularly if they feel cornered or unable to win conventionally. The overall tone is one of alarm about America's strategic direction and growing global instability.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Strategic Silence: Trump’s lack of public response is seen as a way to protect a joint operation or maintain diplomatic positioning.
Mixed Messaging: While Trump criticizes Russia for attacks, he has been silent on Ukrainian counterstrikes. His strategy seems inconsistent or unclear, possibly attempting to pressure both sides.
Desire for Peace Talks: Trump is serious about facilitating negotiations in Istanbul and is willing to be personally involved if it could help.
On Ukraine’s Position
Posturing at Talks: Ukraine's delegate Umarov made strong demands for a ceasefire and humanitarian steps—knowing full well Russia has repeatedly rejected a ceasefire-first approach.
Pressure on Trump: Some see this as Ukraine trying to force Trump away from negotiations and back into the Biden-era military support and sanctions approach.
On Russia, Sanctions, and War Dynamics
Russia Unfazed by Sanctions: Despite years of “crippling” sanctions, Russia’s economy has endured, aided by trade with China, India, and others. Sanctions have failed to weaken Russia meaningfully.
Sanctions Hurt the Poor: Sanctions primarily affect the most vulnerable in the targeted nations while leadership remains insulated.
Negotiations Over Sanctions: The speaker advocates for diplomacy instead of continued reliance on ineffective sanctions.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Trump recently announced the development of a new missile defense system called the Golden Dome, modeled after Israel’s Iron Dome. He claimed it would integrate with current U.S. defenses, be operational within three years, and even intercept missiles from space or across the globe. He emphasized its importance for national survival, noting Canada might join the project.
However, Professor Ted Postol, a former MIT professor and expert in missile defense, strongly criticized the plan, calling it unrealistic and technologically unfeasible. He compared it to Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) or “Star Wars” from the 1980s, which also promised futuristic missile defense but failed due to major technical shortcomings—issues that still persist today.
Postol recounted his experience with SDI, where exaggerated claims, political enthusiasm, and poor scientific validation led to deeply flawed policy decisions. He described how untested and theoretical technologies, like the X-ray laser, were hyped up and presented as game-changers despite never working. This led to what he called a “hallucinatory” policy environment where major Pentagon decisions were driven by fantasy rather than feasibility.
The discussion warns that the Golden Dome may repeat past mistakes: overpromising unproven technology, misleading policymakers, and ultimately wasting resources on a system unlikely to perform as advertised.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The recent meeting in Istanbul between Russia and Ukraine, typically expected to move toward peace, appears to have had the opposite effect. Rather than progressing toward an end to the conflict, both sides presented proposals that made a negotiated settlement even more unlikely, signaling a continuation—and possible escalation—of the war.
Colonel Douglas Macgregor argues that:
The summit was a charade: He believes only Russia is serious about ending the war, while Ukraine’s leadership is entrenched in denial and pursuing unattainable goals.
Ukraine's military is collapsing: Citing massive casualties (upwards of 1.5 million dead) and recent resignations from high-ranking Ukrainian military officials, Macgregor contends that Ukrainian forces are on the verge of collapse.
Zelensky's strategy is to drag in the U.S. militarily: Like Netanyahu in Israel, Zelensky is not seeking peace but rather trying to provoke deeper American military involvement by painting a narrative of strength and momentum.
Drone attacks inside Russia (e.g., Operation Spiderweb) are described as symbolic and aided by U.S. and UK intelligence, but militarily insignificant.
Zelensky’s demands (Russia gets nothing, no territorial concessions) are viewed as delusional and designed to make peace talks impossible.
The West, particularly Washington, is focused on optics: The real strategy is shaping perceptions to keep support flowing, even if the reality on the battlefield is bleak.
In conclusion, Macgregor suggests that current diplomacy is performative and detached from battlefield realities, with the primary goal being to manipulate Western narratives and keep international support for Ukraine alive, despite the crumbling situation on the ground.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Key Points:
Ukrainian Drone Attacks:
Ukraine targeted five Russian air bases, destroying at least 13 strategic bombers (e.g., TU-95s).
Ukraine spent 18 months preparing the attack, even smuggling and assembling equipment inside Russia.
Despite media hype, the Russian military capability remains largely intact; they have ~87 strategic bombers, so operational capacity is not significantly affected.
Western Media & Zelensky's Narrative:
Zelensky claimed the operation was a major success and a turning point, pushing Russia toward diplomacy.
The speaker criticizes Western media for overstating Ukraine’s successes and underreporting Russian advances.
Satellite imagery disproved earlier Ukrainian claims that 41 Russian aircraft were destroyed.
Peace Talks & Diplomatic Reality:
Zelensky claimed Ukraine forced Russia into peace talks, but the speaker counters that Putin proposed direct talks on May 11.
Russia has long expressed interest in negotiations (dating back to 2014 and the Minsk agreements), whereas Zelensky passed a law banning negotiations with Putin.
Military Reality on the Ground:
Russia has been gaining territory steadily since October 2023.
Ukraine is losing troops and lacks the manpower and industrial capacity for a long war of attrition.
Tactical victories like "Spiderweb" have limited strategic impact if not backed by broader battlefield success.
Criticism of Western Support:
The speaker argues the West, particularly Europe and the U.S., continues to support Ukraine based on idealistic or misleading narratives, rather than hard strategic calculations.
Suggests the West should focus on its own interests, not blindly back Ukraine.
Zelensky’s European Tour:
Zelensky attended a summit in Vilnius, continuing to pitch Ukraine as the defender of Europe and highlighting the superiority of Western and Ukrainian weapons.
The speaker views this as emotional rhetoric rather than a reflection of strategic reality.
Conclusion:
The speaker urges a reality-based assessment of the war, challenging overly optimistic Ukrainian and Western claims. While Ukraine’s drone strike was tactically impressive, it does not alter the strategic trajectory of the war, in which Russia continues to advance and maintain overwhelming advantages.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Recent Strikes: Ukraine carried out strikes shortly before peace talks in Istanbul, which may provoke a harsher Russian response.
Negotiation Dynamics: Ukraine expected Russia to share its memorandum before the meeting, but Russia insists it will only share it during the talks.
Russia's Stance: Russian officials have clearly stated this may be the last chance for a diplomatic solution. If not accepted, Russia will aim to win militarily.
Power Imbalance: The speaker highlights Russia's superiority in manpower, equipment, and resources, arguing Ukraine cannot realistically win on the battlefield.
Possibility of Escalation: The speaker suggests Russia might replace the memorandum with an ultimatum and warns of the possibility of a large-scale military escalation.
Western Influence: There is speculation that some Western powers and possibly Zelensky might want to prolong the war to avoid a negotiated settlement that favors Russia, especially ahead of a potential Trump presidency.
U.S. Military Aid Limits: The U.S. has signaled it cannot continue supplying Ukraine at previous levels, contradicting any hopes for renewed heavy support.
Russian Restraint and Future Targets: Russia has seemingly held back from hitting major Ukrainian political and intelligence targets, but that may change in retaliation for the recent attacks.
Overall, the tone is critical of Ukraine and the West, portraying Russia as being methodical and serious about forcing an end to the war on its terms.Explore the podcast
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Military Situation & Strategy:
Russia's gains on the battlefield are not just about territory but about weakening Ukraine's armed forces through a war of attrition.
The Ukrainian defensive lines are thinning, while Russia maintains a numerical advantage and continues to reinforce.
Russia uses missiles, drones, artillery, and glide bombs to target Ukrainian manpower and logistics.
Russian Strategy:
Russia is focused on winning the war, not negotiating, unless on its terms.
Their doctrine prioritizes manpower destruction over territorial gain.
The Kremlin is acting consistently at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels to achieve total victory.
Diplomatic Developments:
A potential peace negotiation is being discussed for June 2 in Istanbul, but Ukraine hasn’t confirmed participation.
Trump administration claims to support negotiations, encouraging both sides to talk.
The U.S. is not participating directly in this upcoming meeting, potentially signaling a shift toward stepping back.
Russian Peace Proposal:
Russia plans to bring a memorandum to the talks, likely demanding:
Ukraine's withdrawal from contested territories.
Ukrainian demilitarization and “denazification”.
A guarantee Ukraine will never join NATO.
These terms are non-starters for Ukraine, suggesting no real breakthrough is likely.
U.S. and Western Position:
The U.S. publicly supports a ceasefire, but has said it may withdraw from negotiations if Russia doesn’t cooperate.
The U.S. ambassador to the UN emphasized that peace depends on Russian actions.
Some frustration is expressed that Zelensky shows no signs of compromise, continuing to demand more Western aid without offering diplomatic flexibility.
Overall Outlook:
The conflict remains deadlocked, with little prospect for meaningful negotiations in the short term.
The West, Ukraine, and Russia remain far apart in their goals and expectations.
The speaker criticizes the confusion in Western media and government about Russia's intentions, stating it's obvious they plan to fight until they win or force Ukraine to surrender.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker discusses the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, focusing on upcoming negotiations, military dynamics, and Western involvement:
Upcoming Talks: Russia and Ukraine are set to meet on Monday, June 2. Both sides are preparing "memorandums" outlining their negotiating positions, which are already well-known publicly.
Stalemate in Positions: Russia hasn't changed its demands and sees no reason to. It is not "stalling" but rather continuing its military campaign while leaving the door open for talks under its strict conditions.
Western Misperceptions: The West often accuses Russia of not wanting peace, but both sides continue military actions. Ukrainian attacks inside Russia are usually ignored by Western media, while Russian actions are heavily publicized.
Germany’s Role: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz recently lifted range restrictions on weapons supplied to Ukraine, allowing them to strike inside Russia. Germany also plans to help Ukraine produce long-range missiles domestically, which the speaker doubts will be successful due to Russian targeting capabilities.
Mutual Escalation: Both Ukraine and Russia are launching drone and missile attacks into each other’s territory. The speaker criticizes Western narratives for only highlighting Russian attacks and ignoring Ukrainian ones, calling it selective and misleading.
Russian Perspective: Russia maintains it is open to negotiations but won't stop fighting unless its conditions are met. Officials warn that strikes on Russia with Western-supplied weapons could lead to retaliation against those supplying countries.
Western Strategy Flawed: Supplying long-range missiles to Ukraine may escalate the war without changing the battlefield dynamics. The speaker argues these weapons haven’t proven effective and may provoke broader conflict, especially if Russia retaliates against Western nations directly.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Trump’s "Deadline" to Putin:
Trump vaguely set a two-week deadline to assess whether Putin is genuinely interested in ending the war in Ukraine. The speaker is skeptical about Trump’s track record with deadlines and his neutrality in this conflict.
Analysis from Larry Johnson (ex-CIA analyst):
Western Media Bias: Johnson criticizes Western media for presenting a one-sided narrative that paints Russia as the sole aggressor while ignoring Ukraine’s missile and drone attacks on Russian territory.
Putin's Peace Terms: Putin is open to a negotiated settlement but only on his terms:
Ukraine must withdraw from all territories Russia claims (and possibly more in the future).
Ukraine must stay out of NATO, and NATO must stop expanding eastward.
Protection for Russian-speaking populations in Ukraine.
Escalating Demands: Putin's conditions are hardening, not softening. He's expanding territorial demands beyond those annexed in 2022.
No Western Leverage: Johnson asserts that the West has no leverage over Putin and that Russia has lost trust in Western negotiations.
Trump’s Role: Johnson criticizes Trump’s claim of neutrality, noting he contributed to the conflict by sending weapons to Ukraine and supporting militarization.
Ukraine’s Position: Zelensky has rejected any withdrawal from currently held Ukrainian territories, making Putin’s conditions non-starters. Johnson argues that Ukraine doesn’t genuinely want peace if they refuse those terms.
Historical Context: Johnson traces the roots of the conflict to NATO expansion and U.S. support for insurgents against Russia starting in the 1990s. He suggests Putin has patiently prepared for this confrontation.
Military Activity: Johnson notes a large Russian missile and drone attack on Ukraine on May 24–25 was retaliation for Ukraine launching over 1,400 drones at Moscow in the prior week.
Civilian Casualties: He claims the low number of civilian casualties from Russian strikes suggests they are not targeting civilians, unlike Ukraine.
Tone and Perspective:
The discussion is heavily critical of the U.S., NATO, and Ukraine.
It portrays Russia as reactive rather than aggressive.
The speaker emphasizes underreported facts from the Russian perspective.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
- もっと表示する
