Episoder
-
Donald Trump’s Easter post on Truth Social exemplifies his characteristic use of vitriol to further his political agenda, particularly in the context of his ongoing immigration crackdown. The post, wrapped in inflammatory rhetoric, attempts to rally his supporters by attacking judges, law enforcement, political adversaries, and even questioning President Biden’s legitimacy. This message coincides with a temporary Supreme Court injunction halting his administration's deportation efforts under the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely invoked law from the 18th century. Trump criticizes the judiciary for halting his policies, framing it as evidence of institutional weakness and a conspiracy to allow criminals into the U.S. This narrative distorts the Supreme Court's decision, which emphasized due process, not an endorsement of gang members' rights. Trump's rhetoric of immigration as an "invasion" perpetuates dehumanizing tropes and seeks to delegitimize political opponents rather than engage in constructive dialogue about immigration reform.
In a separate incident, Trump’s post targeting Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia highlights his tendency to use individuals as symbols in broader political attacks. The post accuses Garcia of being an MS-13 member without offering substantial evidence or context. Trump's rhetoric dismisses any opposition as complicit in defending criminals, a strategy designed to inflame anger among his base while fostering a culture of division and distrust. His call for accountability for those who "lie" about criminals raises concerns about potential repressive measures against dissent, further undermining democratic norms.
In related discussions, Border Czar Tom Homan defended the administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act in an interview, emphasizing national security concerns but failing to address the constitutional and ethical issues associated with expedited deportations and the potential for racial profiling. Meanwhile, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin defended recent deregulations, such as those impacting coal plants and wastewater standards, but his assurances about environmental safety lacked sufficient evidence, raising concerns about the long-term public health implications. Similarly, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum touted the benefits of expanding mining projects and energy production while downplaying the environmental and geopolitical risks involved, particularly in the context of the U.S.'s reliance on China for rare earth minerals.
Lastly, Pope Francis held a brief meeting with Vice President JD Vance at the Vatican, where they exchanged Easter greetings. The meeting follows a history of conflict between Vance, who has defended the Trump administration's controversial immigration policies, and the pope, who has criticized them. This meeting reflects ongoing tensions between religious leaders and political figures over the moral implications of immigration policies, particularly as Pope Francis continues to advocate for compassion and human dignity.
Click here for a full transcript and source links.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
The Trump administration is aggressively reshaping federal institutions to serve partisan goals, undermining civil service neutrality, press freedom, public health communication, and academic independence. Trump’s proposed “Schedule Policy/Career” classification revives his earlier “Schedule F” plan, threatening to politicize the federal workforce by requiring loyalty to presidential policy rather than the law.
His swearing-in of Dr. Oz as CMS administrator devolved into a campaign-style spectacle, emphasizing celebrity over competence. Meanwhile, a federal judge blocked Trump’s plan to mass-fire CFPB employees, and another judge warned but did not yet act on the administration’s partial defiance of a press access ruling favoring the AP.
In public health, the administration erased COVID-19 signage and replaced federal health sites with a partisan “lab leak” page, removing essential resources in favor of political narrative. At the IRS, Trump replaced whistleblower Gary Shapley with loyalist Michael Faulkender but kept Shapley as an advisor, signaling a loyalty-based reshuffling.
The administration also escalated its crackdown on Harvard, citing protests and alleged foreign ties to justify funding freezes and visa threats, drawing criticism for attacking free speech and academic autonomy. These moves reflect a broad effort to erode institutional norms and centralize control under partisan leadership.
Click here for a full transcript and source links.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Mangler du episoder?
-
Donald Trump's recent actions highlight a pattern of controversial rhetoric, economic oversimplifications, and policy shifts that impact both domestic and international affairs. His inflammatory criticism of Jerome Powell, Federal Reserve Chair, and his claim that tariffs make the U.S. “rich” misrepresent economic realities, as tariffs primarily burden domestic consumers and businesses. In his meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Trump’s focus on personal grievances, such as attacking Powell and criticizing the Biden administration, undermined the diplomatic discussions on trade, defense, and migration. His oversimplified comments on the Ukraine war and migration deflected from potential cooperation.
Trump's executive order aimed at revitalizing the U.S. seafood industry pushes for deregulation at the expense of environmental sustainability. It seeks to open protected marine areas for fishing, ignoring the ecological importance of these zones. Similarly, his proclamation to roll back restrictions in the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument prioritizes short-term industry gains over long-term conservation goals. The extension of the federal hiring freeze also creates uncertainty by blocking new hires while increasing the risk of political favoritism.
Legal battles, such as the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, reveal the administration's disregard for judicial rulings. The Supreme Court’s review of Trump’s birthright citizenship order could alter the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, with broad implications for U.S. citizenship policy. Additionally, the Trump administration's moves to downsize agencies, like placing AmeriCorps staff on administrative leave, raise concerns about the impact on public service programs.
Finally, the administration's threats against Harvard University over antisemitism policies reflect a broader push to control academic institutions, with the potential to limit free speech. Trump's rhetoric and policies often focus on short-term political gains while undermining long-term legal, environmental, and diplomatic frameworks.
Click here for a full transcript and source links.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Recent actions by the Trump administration reflect a pattern of politicized governance, legal overreach, and institutional destabilization. Trump’s Truth Social post spread misinformation about immigration, falsely accusing Biden of mass-flying undocumented migrants into the U.S. and attacking judicial due process. His executive order on federal procurement, though framed as cost-cutting, centralizes power and risks inefficiency by prioritizing ideology over mission-specific needs.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt exploited a grieving mother’s story to demonize immigrants and Democrats, using inflammatory rhetoric untethered from legal or factual grounding. Trump’s Easter appearance similarly blurred religious observance with political spectacle, turning a sacred event into a partisan platform.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s autism briefing peddled conspiratorial claims, dismissed genetic science, and stigmatized autistic individuals, signaling an anti-scientific, populist approach to public health. Meanwhile, Judge Boasberg found the administration in probable contempt for defying a deportation order, highlighting executive defiance of judicial authority.
California sued to block Trump’s tariffs, arguing unlawful use of emergency powers that harm the economy. The administration also proposed cutting $1.1 billion from public broadcasting, threatening rural media access. Finally, a DOJ lawsuit against Maine over transgender athletes reveals a broader effort to impose rigid federal gender norms, weaponizing civil rights law to override state authority and local policy.
Click here for a full transcript and source links.
What Did Donald Trump Do Today? is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
The Trump administration has intensified its ideological crackdown on academic institutions, exemplified by threats to revoke Harvard University’s tax-exempt status and the freezing of over $2 billion in federal funds after the school rejected demands for ideological oversight. These actions, rooted in political retaliation rather than legal justification, reflect a broader authoritarian impulse to punish dissent and undermine academic independence. Simultaneously, Trump’s new executive orders promote deregulation, immigration crackdowns, and trade protectionism under the guise of modernization while often weakening oversight and consolidating executive power.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s recent briefing mirrored this politicized agenda, blending religious symbolism, economic exaggeration, and inflammatory rhetoric—particularly around immigration, where due process is increasingly sidelined. Her defense of the wrongful deportation of Kilmer Abrego Garcia and vague threats of deporting citizens highlight a troubling disregard for legal norms.
Elsewhere, Trump’s chaotic behavior at a Navy Midshipmen ceremony further blurred the line between governance and personal grandstanding. Legal battles are mounting, including a lawsuit by international students whose visas were revoked without cause and growing concern over asylum policies that permit case dismissals without hearings.
These developments reveal a governance strategy defined by coercion, spectacle, and ideological enforcement, with lasting consequences for democratic institutions and civil liberties.
Click here for a full transcript and source links.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Donald Trump’s recent actions and rhetoric reflect a pattern of self-serving leadership, authoritarianism, and disregard for democratic norms. His Truth Social post blaming the Russia-Ukraine war on President Biden ignores his own administration’s role in weakening Ukraine support and promotes the baseless claim that the 2020 election was “rigged.” His meeting with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele further showcased admiration for punitive, authoritarian tactics while mocking judicial oversight, immigration protections, and civil rights.
At a White House event honoring the Ohio State Buckeyes, Trump shifted focus from the team’s achievements to personal grievances and political messaging, turning a celebratory ceremony into a campaign-style performance. Similarly, Harvard University is resisting Trump’s threats to revoke federal funding unless it dismantles DEI programs and allows ideological oversight, defending academic freedom and constitutional rights.
The administration faces lawsuits over transparency and executive overreach. The removal of a federal spending database violates a law requiring public disclosure of budget apportionments. A separate lawsuit challenges Trump’s unilateral imposition of tariffs, arguing that taxing powers rest with Congress. Meanwhile, Social Security offices are overwhelmed due to staffing cuts and burdensome policy changes, reducing access to benefits and eroding institutional knowledge.
Labor rights are also under attack, with the Coalition for a Democratic Workplace urging the attorney general to void Biden-era NLRB decisions—a move seen as unlawful and destabilizing. In another retaliatory act, the administration targeted law firm Susman Godfrey, canceling contracts and security clearances due to its representation of Dominion Voting Systems. The firm is suing, citing violations of constitutional rights.
Finally, the closure of regional Head Start offices as part of a Musk-led government downsizing initiative threatens early childhood education for thousands of families. Coupled with proposals to eliminate the program altogether, these changes signal a broad rollback of public services under Trump’s second-term agenda.
Click here for a full transcript and source links.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
The statements, interviews, and media appearances from Trump administration officials paint a picture of a second-term economic and trade strategy defined more by populist rhetoric and political showmanship than coherent policy. Donald Trump’s Truth Social posts, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s TV appearances, and interviews with advisers like Peter Navarro and Kevin Hassett illustrate a chaotic, contradictory, and often misleading narrative around tariffs, trade, and economic nationalism.
Trump’s social media posts employ incendiary language and economic oversimplifications, portraying tariffs as both retribution and salvation. He frames global trade as a hostile conflict, failing to acknowledge how tariffs act as domestic taxes that burden American consumers. His vague threats of “National Security Tariff Investigations” and conflation of fentanyl with electronics policy are strategically emotional but substantively thin. Similarly, his projection of a coming “Golden Age” built on deregulation and tax cuts ignores fiscal realities and international backlash risks.
Lutnick, Navarro, and Hassett each attempt to rationalize shifting tariff policies by citing national security and manufacturing revival, but they offer evasive or inconsistent justifications. Lutnick describes reclassifications of electronics tariffs as strategic repositioning, while Navarro asserts the same exemptions are temporary tactical delays. Hassett, meanwhile, downplays market instability and contradicts earlier no-exemption promises by claiming everything was “part of the plan.” Their conflicting explanations reveal a lack of internal coherence, further destabilizing investor and consumer confidence.
All three advisers also evade the legal challenges surrounding Trump’s aggressive use of executive power for trade policy—especially the questionable invocation of national security statutes like IEEPA and Section 232. When confronted with constitutional concerns, they deflect or distort rather than explain how their actions comply with congressional authority over tariffs.
Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins adds another layer of obfuscation, defending the trade war’s impact on farmers with upbeat but evasive talking points. She minimizes real financial pain in rural communities while promoting aid packages and touting future prosperity without offering a clear roadmap. Her messaging is heavily partisan and deflects criticism of food program cuts and ethanol policy inconsistencies.
Finally, Trump’s legal filings in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia and his attacks on CBS News reveal an authoritarian impulse—seeking to ignore court orders and retaliate against unfavorable media coverage. His demand for FCC intervention against CBS exemplifies a dangerous willingness to politicize regulatory powers and suppress dissent.
Together, these accounts expose a second-term Trump administration pushing an erratic economic agenda rooted in grievance, nationalism, and executive overreach. Rather than offering a principled, data-driven strategy for trade and industry, the administration continues to rely on populist theatrics, legal ambiguity, and media attacks to rally its base—at the cost of transparency, economic stability, and democratic norms.
Click here for a full transcript and source links.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
The recent series of actions and communications by the Trump administration paints a portrait of governance driven by ideological performance, executive overreach, and aggressive messaging. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s latest briefing exemplifies this, adopting a combative, campaign-like tone that highlights inflated accomplishments, glosses over critical details, and sidesteps accountability. Economic claims were exaggerated, civil liberties concerns ignored, and foreign policy contradictions left unresolved. A new media strategy aimed at bypassing traditional press further narrows the administration’s echo chamber. Simultaneously, Trump’s National Security Presidential Memorandum escalates border militarization, framing immigration as a national security threat and blurring the line between civilian law enforcement and military authority—while undermining legal safeguards and federalism.
President Trump’s remarks aboard Air Force One did little to inspire confidence, featuring fragmented responses and vague assertions about serious topics such as diplomacy and judicial rulings. The administration’s controversial directive to mark over 6,000 immigrants as “dead” in federal databases exemplifies its broader effort to weaponize bureaucracy against migrants, bypassing due process and drawing sharp criticism from legal experts and lawmakers. The Social Security Administration’s pivot to using X as its primary communications channel—coupled with staff cuts—has compounded accessibility concerns, especially for vulnerable populations, and reflects a pattern of centralizing power while dismantling institutional transparency.
In the courts, the administration has faced a string of legal setbacks. A federal judge condemned the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia despite a judicial stay, exposing tensions between the executive branch and judicial oversight. Separately, Trump’s deal with major law firms to exchange pro bono services for regulatory leniency raises troubling questions about the politicization of legal practice and executive coercion. Meanwhile, a federal court blocked the administration’s attempt to withhold funds from Maine over transgender sports policy, deeming it an unlawful and unethical abuse of federal power. Across these developments, the Trump administration appears intent on using state mechanisms to enforce ideological conformity, often at the expense of legal precedent, human rights, and democratic norms.
Click here for the full transcript and source links.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Donald Trump’s recent cabinet meeting at the White House served less as a venue for policy discussion and more as a display of political theatrics and loyalty. Characterized by exaggerated claims and sycophantic praise from cabinet members, the meeting functioned as a campaign-style event where Trump positioned himself as the savior of American industry and sovereignty. He presented a distorted economic narrative, asserting there was “no inflation” and touting vague revenue figures while celebrating tariffs as both economic weapons and nationalist tools—even as he contradicted this stance by supporting foreign shipbuilding. Federal institutions were portrayed as corrupt, especially universities and regulatory agencies, with billions in funding withheld from elite schools and climate regulations slashed. Officials echoed pseudo-scientific claims and undermined public health agencies like the CDC and NIH in favor of ideological targets, including SNAP benefits and fluoride use.
The meeting also highlighted how government agencies are being weaponized for political ends. The Justice Department was framed as both a crime-fighting entity and a defender of Elon Musk, while immigration plans promised mass deportations under dehumanizing language. Student activists were labeled threats, and intelligence agencies were assigned to pursue internal “weaponization” narratives through the selective declassification of sensitive files. Trump’s fixation on China drove much of the rhetoric, culminating in the declaration of a “trade emergency” and a barrage of unsubstantiated claims, including accusations that China sent soldiers into Ukraine. His remarks suggested a readiness to blur legal boundaries, including using campaign-funded lawyers in trade deals.
This performance-based governance extended beyond the cabinet meeting. The administration escalated its protectionist agenda through a sweeping executive order that dramatically raises tariffs on Chinese imports and invokes emergency powers meant for national security crises. This move sidesteps congressional oversight, risks economic retaliation, and jeopardizes global trade norms, all while promoting a transactional foreign policy that rewards countries aligned with Trump’s geopolitical narrative. The order reflects a shift from multilateral cooperation to binary, loyalty-based diplomacy, destabilizing U.S. credibility and global supply chains alike.
Meanwhile, the administration suffered a legal defeat as the Supreme Court ruled it must facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a man wrongfully deported to El Salvador in defiance of court orders. The ruling underscored major due process failures in Trump’s immigration agenda and reaffirmed that legal violations by the executive branch remain the government's responsibility to correct—especially when they result in human rights risks abroad. In another court development, a judge allowed a defamation suit against Trump to proceed over false claims he made about the Central Park Five, emphasizing the legal system’s continued pushback against misinformation.
The administration’s aggressive stance toward universities also intensified, with over $1.7 billion in federal funds frozen for Cornell and Northwestern amid investigations tied to civil rights and campus protests. This follows similar actions against other top schools and includes visa revocations and deportation proceedings for student demonstrators. Critics argue the campaign targets pro-Palestinian activism and DEI initiatives under the guise of combating antisemitism, raising concerns over free speech, academic freedom, and discriminatory enforcement.
Finally, a State Department press briefing by Tammy Bruce mirrored the broader administration’s tone—disorganized, politicized, and lacking in substance. Her remarks downplayed serious geopolitical issues, replaced clarity with ideological spin, and avoided accountability on key questions about U.S. policy in the Middle East and beyond. The briefing, like the cabinet meeting, reflected a government more invested in spectacle and narrative control than in transparent or competent governance.
Click here for a full transcript and source links.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Amid growing economic instability and recession fears, President Trump abruptly paused most global tariffs for 90 days while simultaneously hiking Chinese tariffs to 125%, narrowing the broader trade war into a direct U.S.-China confrontation. Markets surged on the news, but the administration's conflicting explanations—ranging from strategic diplomacy to panic over investor anxiety—revealed a reactive, disjointed economic strategy. Canada and Mexico remain excluded from the pause due to fentanyl-related concerns. Trump’s decision, made hastily and announced with little coordination, underscores the unpredictability of his second-term trade policy. While the White House claims this opens space for bespoke trade negotiations, critics point to increasing inflation risks and eroding global trust.
At a chaotic White House briefing tied to the tariff announcement, Trump signed a slew of executive orders combining deregulation, economic nationalism, and personal grievances. He promoted military export reforms but emphasized profit over accountability. His lengthy, theatrical rants on showerhead regulations, consumer appliances, and plastic straws framed policy through grievance rather than substance. More troubling were orders targeting legal professionals and former officials like Chris Krebs and Miles Taylor, accusing them of espionage and lawfare without due process—signaling an authoritarian use of executive power to punish dissent.
Trump’s deregulatory orders further dismantled administrative safeguards. These included “zero-based” regulatory budgeting, mass repeals of rules deemed unlawful, and vague competition mandates. Though framed as innovation-friendly, they effectively weaken consumer protections, burden agencies, and prioritize executive ideology over legal norms. His order on water pressure mocked legal standards and bypassed rulemaking procedures, while his maritime and defense acquisition orders relied on heavy-handed federal coordination and privatization, often contradicting their deregulatory rhetoric. These moves promote a political agenda cloaked in policy language, undermining both governance and regulatory integrity.
Finally, Trump’s effort to remove Democratic appointees from independent agencies—temporarily allowed by Chief Justice Roberts—raises constitutional concerns over executive control of watchdog institutions. Together, these actions reflect a second-term presidency defined by executive overreach, ideological retribution, and destabilization of legal and regulatory norms.
Full transcript and source links can be found here.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
The latest series of Trump administration actions and communications reflect a deeply ideological, performative, and legally contentious approach to governance. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered an aggressively partisan press briefing that leaned heavily on inflammatory rhetoric, legal mischaracterizations, and vague policy statements—casting deportees as "terrorist invaders," misrepresenting Supreme Court rulings, and touting contradictory trade and economic claims. The administration's energy agenda has crystallized into a full-scale campaign to resurrect the coal industry through deregulation, legal overreach, and nationalist symbolism, as seen in several executive orders. These include efforts to override state environmental laws, freeze clean energy progress, and expand fossil fuel dependency under the guise of grid reliability and national security. Trump’s speeches and public statements, including a Truth Social post, continue to present foreign policy and complex diplomatic matters in self-promotional, transactional terms, emphasizing personal achievements while misrepresenting facts. In the legal realm, the administration has faced pushback and narrow Supreme Court interventions on controversial firings of federal employees and wrongful deportations. Simultaneously, it has dismantled regulatory frameworks like the DOJ’s crypto enforcement unit, furthering its deregulatory agenda while drawing ethics concerns over Trump’s financial interests. Judicial rulings, such as the reinstatement of AP to the White House press pool, underscore ongoing constitutional clashes between press freedom and executive overreach. Meanwhile, the State Department was forced to reverse aid cuts to the U.N. World Food Program after acknowledging termination errors amid the dismantling of USAID. Collectively, these developments highlight a second-term administration marked by legal defiance, institutional disruption, media antagonism, and a revivalist energy policy rooted in fossil fuel loyalty rather than long-term sustainability or sound governance.
Sources:
YouTube (White House)YouTube (White House)White House Briefing RoomWhite House Briefing RoomWhite House Briefing RoomTruth SocialAssociated PressAssociated PressThe HillNBC NewsPolitico
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Donald Trump has used a series of high-profile events, social media posts, and executive actions to advance a vision of governance driven more by political spectacle than policy coherence. His announcement of new retaliatory tariffs against China—delivered via Truth Social—was steeped in combative language and dramatized rhetoric, portraying trade as a battlefield of good versus evil. The threat of a 50% tariff increase, absent details or economic rationale, exemplifies Trump's tendency to use trade policy as a political weapon rather than a strategic tool. This theme continued during his chaotic bilateral meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, where diplomatic norms gave way to personal boasting, contradictions, and controversial remarks—including a neo-colonial proposal for Gaza that alarmed international observers.
At a celebratory White House event for the Los Angeles Dodgers, Trump again blurred the line between governance and campaign performance, overshadowing the team’s achievements with off-topic rants and partisan jabs. Meanwhile, his memorandum directing a fresh review of Nippon Steel’s attempted acquisition of U.S. Steel undercuts his own nationalist rhetoric, raising questions about whether his administration’s “America First” policy is being selectively applied for political convenience. On immigration, the administration is resisting a federal court’s order to return a wrongly deported man while seeking to expand its use of the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants en masse—moves that have intensified legal battles over executive overreach.
Trump's abrupt termination of U.S. funding for the World Food Program and other humanitarian contracts has triggered a humanitarian fallout, undermining global aid operations and exposing vulnerable populations to heightened risk. Simultaneously, the firing of senior military officials—including America’s top NATO representative—signals an ongoing purge within the national security establishment, potentially reshaping military leadership based on ideological loyalty rather than competence. Taken together, these actions reflect a presidency increasingly defined by grievance, theatrical displays of power, and a deep disregard for institutional stability, global alliances, and policy nuance.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
In the wake of a volatile economic week, the Trump administration found itself facing withering scrutiny over its newly imposed global tariffs, which have rattled markets, drawn international retaliation and raised fears of a looming recession. On April 2, President Trump declared “Liberation Day,” introducing sweeping tariffs of 10% on most imports and up to 79% on select nations, triggering the worst day on Wall Street since the COVID-19 crash. As economic analysts warned of inflation and job losses, Trump spent the weekend at his Florida properties, attending a Saudi-backed golf event and fundraising at Mar-a-Lago, notably skipping a dignified transfer ceremony for fallen U.S. soldiers—a move that drew bipartisan criticism for its perceived insensitivity. Meanwhile, administration officials attempted to defend the economic policy on major news shows but repeatedly struggled to provide coherent justifications. Economic advisors like Kevin Hassett and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent leaned on outdated analogies and rhetorical evasions, minimizing massive market losses and dismissing inflation risks without offering concrete timelines or mitigation strategies. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick relied on populist appeals and ideological framing, often contradicting themselves on whether the tariffs were negotiable or permanent while dodging technical critiques of their execution. Attorney General Pam Bondi, in a separate Fox News interview, deflected legal scrutiny of Trump’s actions, vilified judicial oversight, and refused to clarify whether Trump respected constitutional term limits. Together, the week’s developments paint a picture of an administration advancing a radical economic and political agenda while prioritizing image over impact, ideology over data, and loyalty over legal and economic consistency.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Following a major tariff announcement that triggered market instability and inflation fears, President Trump spent the weekend at Mar-a-Lago promoting his agenda and posting on Truth Social that it was a “GREAT TIME TO GET RICH,” drawing criticism for being out of touch with public anxiety. Economists, lawmakers, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell warned of inflation and recession risks, but Trump instead pressured Powell to cut interest rates, undermining the Fed’s independence while spreading misinformation—including a false Warren Buffett quote—to defend his policies.
Trump’s tariffs also derailed a nearly finalized deal to restructure TikTok’s U.S. operations, after China withdrew support in response to the trade escalation. Though Trump portrayed this as strategic leverage, the collapse blurred lines between trade policy and digital regulation.
Meanwhile, a federal judge ordered the administration to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident wrongfully deported to El Salvador despite legal protections, calling the deportation unconstitutional and based on flimsy claims. In another legal setback, a judge ruled FEMA violated a court order by withholding disaster grants as part of a covert campaign against sanctuary jurisdictions.
Trump scored a narrow Supreme Court win allowing his administration to cut $65 million in teacher training grants tied to DEI programs. Critics called it ideologically driven and legally unjustified. Separately, a judge blocked Trump’s attempt to dismantle the Inter-American Foundation, ruling that only its bipartisan board—not the president—had authority over its leadership.
Collectively, these events highlight Trump’s second-term approach: centralized power, disregard for legal norms, and the use of economic and executive tools to advance political goals at the expense of institutional integrity and public trust.
What Did Donald Trump Do Today? is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Donald Trump’s recent press gaggle aboard Air Force One exemplified his improvisational, self-promoting approach to governance. He opened with a pitch for a “Trump Card Gold Card,” then rambled through topics like the economy, foreign policy, and golf without structure or factual grounding. His economic claims were exaggerated and lacked substance, touting “trillions” in investment and praising tariffs as leverage while ignoring their costs. Foreign policy remarks were similarly hollow, crediting himself with hostage releases and progress on Ukraine, again without evidence. Domestically, Trump admitted firing staff over loyalty concerns and confirmed far-right activist Laura Loomer’s influence on appointments, reflecting an administration prioritizing obedience over expertise. His blending of business with state matters—referencing Trump golf courses and the LIV-PGA merger—further blurred ethical lines.
His sweeping new tariffs—10% across the board, up to 54% on key partners—have triggered global backlash, market instability, and threats of retaliation, especially from the EU and China. Allies like Canada and Japan voiced concern, and automakers announced layoffs. The administration defends the tariffs as correcting “unfair trade,” but economists warn of rising costs and inflation. The strategy appears more ideological than strategic, damaging alliances and threatening economic stability ahead of the April 9 rollout.
Vice President JD Vance, meanwhile, delivered a combative Fox & Friends interview steeped in populist rhetoric but devoid of policy coherence. He pushed dubious economic claims about tariffs, floated authoritarian immigration proposals, and glorified Elon Musk’s informal government role. His tone suggested self-promotion for 2028, not serious governance. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed this performative style, defending tariffs with misleading stats and bombastic language while dodging economic realities and trade diplomacy questions.
In a troubling personnel move, Trump fired three NSC officials after a meeting with Loomer, signaling a purge based on loyalty. The firings, opposed by some inside the administration, highlight growing dysfunction and the erosion of national security norms. Separately, the Department of Education threatened to cut Title I funds to schools with DEI programs, leveraging civil rights laws to push a cultural agenda—potentially harming low-income students.
In the courts, Trump lost a UK lawsuit against Orbis Business Intelligence over the Steele dossier and was ordered to pay $823,000 in legal fees, reinforcing his struggles with credibility and mounting legal defeats abroad. Domestically, a D.C. Circuit ruling allowed his administration’s push to dismantle the CFPB to proceed procedurally, setting the stage for a constitutional showdown over executive overreach. Meanwhile, the Pentagon is reviewing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of Signal to plan classified strikes—raising serious concerns about security breaches involving top officials like Vance and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz.
Finally, Dr. Mehmet Oz was narrowly confirmed to lead CMS despite widespread concerns over his history of promoting pseudoscience. His appointment—like much of Trump’s second-term leadership—signals a continued prioritization of brand, loyalty, and media celebrity over competence and institutional integrity.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” speech marked a dramatic embrace of economic nationalism, centered on sweeping new tariffs—including a universal 10% baseline on all imports—and framed as a reclaiming of American economic sovereignty. Delivered in populist, inflammatory language, the speech painted foreign trade as an assault on U.S. industry and promised retaliatory tariffs on countries with higher trade barriers. Trump claimed these measures would generate trillions in revenue, cut taxes, and boost jobs without causing inflation—despite economists warning they would raise consumer prices and harm supply chains. He cited vague corporate endorsements and exaggerated promises of industrial revival, offering little policy detail or economic grounding.
Trump immediately signed executive orders invoking emergency powers to enforce the tariffs and crack down on low-value Chinese imports, including measures meant to address the opioid crisis. These orders stretch the definition of national security and risk executive overreach, undermining trade norms and straining relations with allies. Markets plummeted in response, with investors fearing inflation, trade wars, and recession.
Meanwhile, Trump lashed out at dissenting Republicans in a Truth Social post, using fentanyl and tariffs as political bludgeons in a grievance-filled message that conflated party loyalty with patriotism. His administration also faced legal setbacks: a judge blocked cuts to legal aid for migrant children, and a federal appeals court upheld a restraining order limiting access to Social Security data. Trump’s deal with law firm Milbank LLP to provide pro bono services and drop DEI initiatives reflects ongoing tensions between his administration and the legal sector. Together, these developments underscore a second-term agenda driven by protectionism, institutional distrust, and political retaliation.
What Did Donald Trump Do Today? is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
The recent developments in the Trump administration reflect a pattern of governance marked by aggressive partisanship, institutional overreach, and politicized policymaking. In a troubling case of wrongful deportation, the administration admitted in court that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a legally protected immigrant, was mistakenly deported to El Salvador and imprisoned, yet refuses to facilitate his return, invoking executive authority over foreign affairs.
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s recent briefing further underscored this combative stance, using populist rhetoric to defend harsh immigration policies, dismiss economic risks of new tariffs, and justify dismantling the Department of Education, all while showing open contempt for judicial constraints.
Meanwhile, Trump’s financial literacy message—framed as a call for empowerment—was more a platform for tax cuts and deregulation than a genuine educational initiative. His Truth Social posts continue this trend, distorting facts around the fentanyl crisis, calling to defund public media, and praising a controversial legal firm’s $100 million pro bono pledge tied explicitly to Trump’s partisan causes. That same firm’s rejection of DEI initiatives and alignment with Trump’s “weaponized justice” narrative signals a troubling politicization of elite legal institutions.
Concurrently, sweeping layoffs at the CDC and FDA—part of Trump and Elon Musk’s downsizing plan—are slashing essential public health infrastructure, raising alarm among experts.
In academia, Princeton University is the latest Ivy League school to have major federal research funding suspended amid federal probes into alleged campus antisemitism, prompting backlash over political interference in education.
Finally, a coalition of 23 state attorneys general has sued the administration for rescinding $11 billion in public health funding, warning of devastating consequences to addiction treatment, disease control, and healthcare access.
What Did Donald Trump Do Today? is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Karoline Leavitt’s Press Remarks: Spectacle Over Substance
Key Themes:
* Leavitt's briefing outside the White House was marked by partisan rhetoric, evasive responses, and a combative tone toward journalists.
* She referred to an upcoming tariff announcement as “Liberation Day”, dramatizing a policy change without providing meaningful detail on its scope.
* On immigration, she touted deportations of alleged gang members without offering legal transparency. When questioned, she launched into accusatory tirades, deflecting scrutiny by attacking the media.
* Leavitt dismissed concerns about Trump’s third-term flirtations, calling them jokes, thereby normalizing authoritarian rhetoric.
* She failed to provide updates on Ukraine, and dodged accountability regarding internal leaks, choosing instead to attack the press and invoke administration loyalty figures.
Critique: Leavitt’s approach prioritizes loyalist theatrics and media antagonism over responsible communication. Her performance erodes institutional credibility and replaces informative discourse with ideological pageantry.
Ticket Scalping Executive Order: Real Problem, Performative Rollout
Key Themes:
* Trump announced an executive order targeting ticket scalping, with enforcement by the DOJ and FTC. The action addresses a genuine consumer concern but lacks clear metrics or regulatory teeth.
* The event spiraled into a self-promotional spectacle, with Trump digressing into unrelated topics and praising allies like Kid Rock and Alina Habba.
* Kid Rock, ironically, offered a more thoughtful analysis of the issue than Trump.
Critique: A serious issue was undermined by chaotic showmanship. The executive order may offer symbolic value, but without legislative backing or enforcement clarity, it remains more campaign theater than policy solution.
U.S. Investment Accelerator Executive Order: Deregulation Disguised as Growth
Key Themes:
* Trump created a new office under the Department of Commerce to fast-track $1B+ investment projects, citing overregulation as a barrier to growth.
* The order lacks definitions, benchmarks, or oversight. It favors large corporations and risks regulatory evasion under vague “better deal” language.
* It overlaps with existing agencies, raising concerns about bureaucratic redundancy and political favoritism.
Critique: This is executive overreach disguised as pro-business reform, consolidating power under vague authority with minimal safeguards for environmental, labor, or community impact.
DOJ Drops Lawsuit Against Georgia’s SB 202: A Retreat from Civil Rights
Key Themes:
* AG Pam Bondi dismissed the DOJ lawsuit challenging Georgia’s voting law, citing increased turnout as proof of no suppression.
* She ignored evidence showing disparities in turnout rates and systemic barriers for voters of color.
* The move aligns DOJ with Trump-era narratives, framing voter suppression concerns as fabricated.
Critique: This is a political maneuver cloaked in legal rhetoric, one that misinterprets data and abandons the DOJ’s role as a guardian of voting rights, especially for marginalized communities.
Deportations to El Salvador: Human Rights Abuses by Proxy
Key Themes:
* The administration deported 17 alleged gang-affiliated migrants to El Salvador, which has agreed to imprison U.S. deportees regardless of nationality.
* Deportees are subject to harsh conditions in maximum-security prisons.
* The policy relies on the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, though courts have temporarily blocked further removals under this authority.
Critique: This is an alarming externalization of immigration enforcement through alliances with authoritarian regimes, raising serious legal and human rights concerns.
Pardon of January 6 Participant Thomas Caldwell: Impunity for Insurrectionists
Key Themes:
* Trump fully pardoned Caldwell, a January 6 participant convicted of tampering with evidence.
* This follows a trend of clemency for far-right extremists, including Oath Keepers and Proud Boys.
Critique: The pardons signal a deliberate rehabilitation of anti-democratic actors, reframing insurrectionists as patriots and weakening rule of law.
Targeting Harvard Over Antisemitism: Civil Rights or Political Pressure?
Key Themes:
* Harvard faces a federal compliance review of its contracts, echoing actions taken against Columbia over antisemitism concerns.
* The administration accuses Harvard of failing to protect Jewish students and promoting “divisive ideologies.”
Critique: While antisemitism must be addressed, the administration appears to be using civil rights enforcement as a political cudgel, weaponizing funding threats to enforce ideological conformity.
LULAC Lawsuit Over Citizenship Voting Order: Constitutional Crisis Brewing
Key Themes:
* Trump’s new executive order requires proof of citizenship to vote, bans late-arriving mail ballots, and compels federal data sharing with states.
* LULAC and allies argue the order oversteps executive authority and violates federalism.
* Critics warn it could disenfranchise Latino voters and is rooted in baseless fraud claims.
Critique: The order is an unconstitutional attempt to centralize election control, designed to suppress votes under the guise of integrity.
SEC vs. Elon Musk: Accountability Under Fire
Key Themes:
* The SEC’s $150M lawsuit against Musk over deceptive stock purchases is moving forward.
* Musk, now a federal official, has agreed to respond by June.
Critique: The case underscores tensions between celebrity power and regulatory enforcement, raising questions about accountability in a politicized justice environment.
Dismantling the IMLS: Erasing Cultural Infrastructure
Key Themes:
* The IMLS staff was placed on leave after Trump’s appointee took over, following an executive order to shrink federal agencies.
* The agency funds critical library and museum programs, especially in underserved areas.
Critique: This move represents a quiet dismantling of America’s cultural and educational infrastructure, prioritizing ideology over access to public knowledge.
Title X Funding Cuts: Ideological Warfare on Healthcare
Key Themes:
* The administration is withholding $27M from providers allegedly violating DEI and immigration policies.
* Planned Parenthood and others face defunding amid non-transparent enforcement.
Critique: This is a targeted ideological purge of the public health system, likely to harm vulnerable communities and erode the healthcare safety net.
TPS Revocation Blocked by Court: Judiciary as a Check on Executive Overreach
Key Themes:
* A judge blocked the administration’s attempt to revoke TPS for Venezuelans, calling it discriminatory and unjustified.
* Secretary Kristi Noem’s rationale was criticized as biased and unsupported.
Critique: The ruling reaffirms the importance of judicial oversight in protecting migrants from xenophobic policymaking and arbitrary deportation.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Elon Musk’s “town hall” in Green Bay, Wisconsin, billed as a push for government efficiency under his proposed “Department of Government Efficiency” (Doge), revealed a disturbing convergence of political spectacle, authoritarian rhetoric, and tech-industry gloss. While framed as a crusade against waste and fraud, the event positioned Musk not merely as a concerned citizen but as an unelected, self-anointed authority seeking to reshape governance without accountability. He attacked federal institutions with sweeping disdain, advocating for the elimination of nearly all government agencies and mocking the idea of democratic complexity in favor of a radical, billionaire-driven minimalism. The event took a darker turn as Musk trafficked in election denialism, antisemitic-coded conspiracies, and fearmongering about “activist judges” and immigrant voter fraud. In a stunning display of financial coercion, Musk gave out million-dollar checks to attendees involved in targeting judges, blurring the line between civic engagement and political bribery. He cloaked these actions in tech jargon and pseudoscientific claims, laundering disinformation through the language of innovation. The gathering culminated in cult-like displays of loyalty, with prayers for Musk’s safety and cheers comparing Trump favorably to fascist dictators. Ultimately, the event was less about reform and more about Musk unveiling his political ambitions—melding wealth, media manipulation, and demagoguery into a dangerous new model of influence. His performance marked a chilling evolution in American political culture, where the lines between tech empire and authoritarian governance are vanishing fast.
What Did Donald Trump Do Today? is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe -
Media Crackdown and Judicial Pushback
* A federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to dismantle the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), calling it “arbitrary and capricious.”
* The administration had cut funding and sought to shut down outlets like Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Free Asia.
* The move followed a March 14 executive order slashing budgets and accusing VOA of pushing “anti-American” narratives.
* Former anchor and Trump adviser Kari Lake defended the crackdown as protecting "American values," calling the legal backlash “lawfare.”
* The ruling protects over 1,200 jobs while lawsuits challenging the shutdown proceed.
Executive Pressure on Law Firms
* Law firm Skadden, Arps avoided being targeted by a Trump executive order by agreeing to provide $100 million in pro bono services aligned with administration priorities.
* The firm also agreed to end DEI-based hiring, adopt merit-only recruitment, and not refuse clients based on politics.
* The arrangement came after public criticism, including from Elon Musk, and mirrors a similar deal with Paul, Weiss.
* Legal experts warn of executive overreach and violations of the First Amendment, as the administration exerts pressure to reshape legal industry norms.
Dismantling of U.S. Institute of Peace
* The administration, via Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), shut down the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) without congressional approval.
* Over 200 employees were fired abruptly, and DOGE took over the building and digital systems using physical and cyber force.
* Legal experts argue the president lacks authority to dissolve a Congressionally chartered institution without legislation.
* The move is widely viewed as a constitutional crisis, raising alarms over unchecked executive power and the destruction of civil society institutions.
Labor and Trade Policy Contradictions
* UAW President Shawn Fain, in a Face the Nation interview, supported tariffs as a tool to protect American jobs but lacked a clear industrial strategy.
* He criticized Trump’s anti-labor executive order eliminating collective bargaining for federal workers but left the door open to cooperation.
* Fain's positions revealed contradictions: support for economic nationalism vs. concern over union-busting, and criticism of trade deals without viable alternatives.
* He avoided discussing global labor exploitation and lacked a coherent vision for international solidarity, weakening the union’s negotiating power.
Anti-Musk and Anti-Corporate Protests
* Massive protests targeted Tesla dealerships across the U.S. and Europe in response to Musk’s growing role in Trump’s administration.
* Activists accuse Musk of facilitating corporate authoritarianism through DOGE, particularly after his role in shuttering USIP.
* Protests included peaceful demonstrations and some vandalism, with global backlash against Tesla's brand.
* Though Musk downplayed the crisis, investor confidence is fading as sales decline and public anger intensifies.
Greenland Diplomacy Crisis
* VP JD Vance sparked a diplomatic row with Denmark during a visit to Greenland, criticizing Danish governance and suggesting possible U.S. acquisition.
* Denmark and Greenland firmly rejected the rhetoric, emphasizing cooperation over domination.
* Trump reiterated ambitions to "get Greenland," escalating tension with a NATO ally and provoking protests in Copenhagen.
* The episode reflects Trump’s transactional, coercive foreign policy and threatens to undermine Arctic cooperation and NATO unity.
Iran Nuclear Standoff Reignites
* Iran rejected Trump’s outreach and ruled out direct nuclear talks, citing lack of trust after the 2018 deal withdrawal and Soleimani’s assassination.
* Trump has threatened extreme military action if no agreement is reached.
* Tensions are escalating amid regional conflict, U.S. airstrikes, and Iran’s growing uranium enrichment near weapons grade.
* Diplomacy is at a standstill, and the situation is becoming increasingly volatile, with fears of regional war mounting.
Get full access to What Did Donald Trump Do Today? at whatdiddonaldtrumpdotoday.substack.com/subscribe - Se mer
