Episodes

  • Inside the Lab is joined by experts Drs. Hannah Wang from the Cleveland Clinic and Rodney Rohde from Texas State University to discuss emerging respiratory viruses. Their discussion begins with lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and an overview of what technologies have emerged since. They go on to discuss the virology and surveillance strategies for H5N1 and RSV, as well as vaccine hesitancy and its impact in the treatment of measles.

  • In this episode of Inside the Lab, Dr. Ali Brown sits down with guests Sean Tucker, MLS(ASCP)CM and Laura Severs, MHA, MLS(ASCP)CM to discuss their predictions for what 2025 holds for laboratory professionals. Topics discussed include:

    How workforce trends will continue in the near future and what strategies may work for addressing them;What to expect with automation and what pros and cons automation holds for Labradorians; What challenges, risks, and benefits cybersecurity holds for laboratory professionals, particular as digital pathology becomes more prevalent;What's coming with AI and what it means for the practice of laboratory medicine.
  • Missing episodes?

    Click here to refresh the feed.

  • In this episode of Inside the Lab, guests Jane Dickerson, PhD and Elise Occhipinti, MD join host Kelly Swails to discuss the creation and maintenance of laboratory test stewardship programs. Topics covered include:

    How and why your organization should set up a stewardship programInvolving stakeholders in the process The essential components of a success programMetrics and key performance indicators to trackResources, guidelines, and toolkits for those looking to create their own program
  • While the rapid evolution of I-O continues to bring unprecedented change to the way cancer is treated, there are significant gaps impacting the laboratory team regarding the examination of resection specimens following neoadjuvant immunotherapy and staying abreast of advances in I-O biomarker testing.

    This episode discusses advances in I-O biomarker testing, advantages and limitations of some key I-O biomarkers, and practical ways that pathologists and laboratory professionals can improve their I-O biomarker testing workflows to optimize patient care.

    Topics discussed include:

    Recent advances in immune-oncology (I-O) biomarker testing Advantages and limitations of IO biomarkers Addressing challenges related to IO biomarkers Improving IO biomarker workflows Best practices for collaboration with the multidisciplinary cancer care team
  • The diagnostic paradigm for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has rapidly shifted in the last five years as fluid-based biomarker testing has emerged as a reliable, accurate, and accessible means to detect amyloid pathology when evaluating a patient for cognitive decline. This podcast is designed to help pathologists and laboratory professionals gain an understanding of plasma testing for markers such as Abeta40/42, P-tau181, and P-tau217 which are rapidly appearing in the commercial space and how healthcare providers have begun incorporating these tests into routine neurology practice. This podcast will help participants to understand the advantages and limitations of these assays as well as their potential application when a physician is evaluating a patient for AD.

  • Communicating imperative diagnoses effectively can often be a daunting challenge. It’s a crucial and delicate step that takes practice and know-how to do well and can be one of the most important actions taken with patients. That’s why a panel of experts have gotten together to discuss the current practices, gaps, and best practices for communication of urgent and significant/unexpected diagnoses in anatomic pathology.

    The Promoting Diagnostic Excellence by Improving the Communication of Urgent and Unexpected Diagnoses in Anatomic Pathology podcast is designed to support the collaboration with clinical partners as well as to notice actionable opportunities where the communication of urgent and significant/unexpected diagnoses in anatomic pathology may be improved.

    You will learn to:

    Understand current guidelines and practices for communication of urgent and unexpected diagnosis in anatomic pathology. Discuss high-priority communication barriers.Discuss best practices and recommendations for effective and timely communication of urgent and significant/unexpected diagnoses.
  • Women make up a majority of the workforce in pathology yet lag behind men in leadership roles. What are the consequences of this for women working in pathology today, and what can be done?

    In this episode of Inside the Lab, Drs. Melissa Upton and Kimberly Sanford share a warm conversation in which they reflect on their long and varied careers, describe the unique challenges they faced over their careers, and discuss their accomplishments as trailblazers themselves. Our guests describe the value of finding mentors, They also describe the opportunities for the future of pathology, particularly in the context of working in a multigenerational workforce with evolving expectations of workplace culture.

  • Although molecular testing offers promising opportunities for diagnosis and targeted treatment of cancers, prostate cancer has lagged behind other types of cancer. Recently, homologous recombination repair testing in prostate cancer has provided a means to achieving targeted treatments for patients as well as opening new avenues of collaboration between pathologists and oncologists.

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, hosts Ms. Kelly Swails, MLS(ASCP), and Dr. Ali Brown, MD, FASCP are joined by Heather Cheng, a medical oncologist and associate professor of hematology and oncology at the University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, and Colin Pritchard, molecular pathologist and professor of laboratory science and director of the Genetics and Solid Tumors Laboratory at the University of Washington Medical Center.

    Our panelists discuss the current treatment landscape for prostate cancer and how HRR testing can improve patient outcomes in this context.

    Topics Covered

    An introduction to metastatic prostate cancer testing, and what types of tests are standard of care, and the rationale for targeting prostate cancer using PARPKey findings from recent phase III randomized clinical trialsStandards for optimal testing in prostate cancer, particularly concerning sample sources and the choice between next-generation sequencing (NGS) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodscommon pitfalls or challenges in the arena of accurately reporting and interpreting findings from HRR testsPractical tips for optimal coordination among a multidisciplinary, cross-departmental team of healthcare providers and laboratory professionals when utilizing HRR testing in prostate cancer management.


    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Dr. Cheng
    Dr. Cheng on LinkedIn

    Connect with Dr. Pritchard
    Dr. Pritchard

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Brown
    Ms. Swails on Twitter
    Dr. Brown on Twitter

    Resources
    ASCP Membership 2024
    Proposed FDA Regulation of Laboratory Developed Tests
    Public Comment on the FDA’s Proposed Rule
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • As CRC affects younger and more diverse populations, emerging tests for CRC biomarkers provide enormous utility for diagnosis. However, misdiagnosis of CRC, shifting demographics of those afflicted with CRC, and patient unfamiliarity with symptoms create challenges in identifying CRC. In this episode of Inside the Lab, hosts Dr. Ali Brown and Lotte Mulder are joined by Dr. Melissa Taggart, a board-certified pathologist at MD Cancer Center and Karla Valencia, a laboratory manager at MD Anderson Cancer Center to discuss the utility of biomarker testing for CRC.

    The hosts are also joined by Sarah Claeys, who was diagnosed with Stage I CRC in 2020 and is now actively fighting Stage IV recurrence with metastatic disease primarily in the liver, and ASCP Patient Champion Heather Tucker, who suffered from misdiagnosis for years before being diagnosed for CRC. She completed treatment 5 years ago. Sarah and Heather share their experiences with seeking both diagnosis and treatment, and provide insights on what information related to biomarkers were most valuable to them.

    Topics Covered in this podcast include:

    How have tests for CRC evolved recently, and which biomarkers they test for; How laboratory quality control is used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of colorectal cancer biomarker test results; Factors involved with validating and implementing new biomarker assays for CRC in the laboratory; Handling pre-analytical variables and potential interferences that may affect the interpretation of biomarker test results for colorectal cancer; How pathologists integrate molecular and biomarker findings into pathology reports; What information related biomarkers was most valuable from a patients’ perspective was most valuable when seeking treatment for CRC, as well as patient advice for healthcare professionals, including pathologists and laboratory professionals, regarding laboratory testing, including biomarker testing.

    Connect with ASCP

    ASCP

    ASCP on Facebook

    ASCP on Instagram

    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Ms. Bartosh, Ms. Courtright & Mr. Bowman

    University Health Laboratory Services

    Ms. Bartosh on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Brown

    Ms. Swails on Twitter

    Dr. Mulder on Twitter

    Resources

    CAP Inspection Checklists

    ASCP Patient Champions Program

    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • The availability of targeted therapies has changed the landscape of cancer treatment in the last few years. And two types of cancer particularly affected by these advances are melanoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma or NSCLC. What role does the laboratory play in the diagnosis and treatment of these cancers? How can pathologists and lab professionals work with oncologists to optimize biomarker testing and improve patient outcomes?

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, your hosts, Ms. Kelly Swails, MT(ASCP), and Dr. Ali Brown, MD, FASCP, are joined by Dr. Sanjay Mukhopadhyay, MD, Director of the Lung Pathology Service at the Cleveland Clinic, Ms. Lynnette Pineault, MBA, SCT(ASCP), Operations Manager for Laboratory and Genetic Services for Health Partners, and Mr. Jim Ondick, ASCP Patient Champion and IT Associate at The University of Kansas Health System, to discuss advancements in biomarker testing to improve NSCLC and melanoma cancer care.

    Listen in for insight on ensuring equitable patient access to biomarker testing and learn how to register for ASCP’s Immuno-Oncology Microlearning Courses for pathologists and laboratory professionals.

    Topics Covered 

    How targeted therapies and immunotherapies have improved treatment for melanoma and lung cancer in the past few years Mr. Ondick’s success story of being treated with immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma and why he had little interaction with laboratory professionals during his diagnosis and treatmentHow pathologists can work with oncologists and surgeons to improve care for patients with cancer The obstacles to providing laboratory services or support for biomarker testing Dr. Mukhopadhyay and Ms. Pineault’s advice on designing workflows to optimize biomarker testing and ensuring equitable access for patients Mr. Ondick’s take on what cancer patients should know about the laboratory team

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Dr. Mukhopadhyay
    Dr. Mukhopadhyay at Cleveland Clinic
    Dr. Mukhopadhyay on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Pineault
    Ms. Pineault on ResearchGate
    Ms. Pineault on LinkedIn

    Connect with Mr. Ondick
    Mr. Ondick on LinkedIn
    Mr. Ondick’s Story on ASCP Patient Champions

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Brown
    Ms. Swails on Twitter
    Dr. Brown on Twitter

    Resources
    ASCP Patient Champions
    ASCP Immuno-Oncology Microlearning Courses
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

    Sponsor
    Bristol Myers Squibb

  • Recent developments in disease modifying therapies have been proven to slow the progression of cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer’s disease.

    And yet, we can only confirm a diagnosis of AD after a patient’s death.

    But what if we could use biomarkers to identify preclinical stage Alzheimer’s and step in long before a patient exhibits dementia?

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, your host, Ms. Kelly Swails, MT(ASCP) introduces us to Dr. Shih-Hsiu Jerry Wang, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Pathology and Assistant Professor of Neurology at the Duke University School of Medicine, and shares his talk on emerging biomarkers for the assessment of Alzheimer’s disease from the ASCP 2023 Annual Meeting.

    Dr. Wang explains how we measure AD right now and why there’s discordance between the clinical presentation and pathology of Alzheimer’s.

    Dr. Wang walks us through the core biomarkers for identifying AD per the AT(N) framework, describing the pros and cons of current detection methodologies and offering recommendations around when to use blood biomarkers versus PET imaging or CSF.

    Listen in for insight into the ongoing search for better AD biomarkers and learn what we are doing to diagnose Alzheimer’s in its early stages and intervene accordingly.

    Topics Covered

    · The clinical definition of Alzheimer’s disease and how it impacts cognitive function
    · How we measure Alzheimer’s in pathology by amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles
    · Why there’s discordance between the clinical presentation and pathology of AD
    · The core biomarkers for identifying Alzheimer’s disease per the AT(N) framework
    · Identifying the stages of AD based on amyloid plaque, pathologic tau and neurodegeneration
    · Examples of PET imaging for the different stages of AD and how imaging biomarkers predict cognitive decline
    · The limitations of fluid biomarkers vs. imaging biomarkers to detect Alzheimer's disease
    · Some of the emerging ultrasensitive biomarker detection methods in development for AD
    · Using cerebral spinal fluids (CSF) vs. plasma biomarkers to identify Alzheimer's disease
    · A comparison of the mass spectrometry vs. SIMOA methods of analyzing p-tau biomarkers
    · Why Dr. Wang suggests blood biomarkers for AD screening (with confirmation by PET or CSF)
    · Why SNAP-25, NfL and GFAP are not considered core biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease
    · The ongoing search for better biomarkers and ultrasensitive detection methods for AD

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Dr. Wang
    Dr. Wang at Duke University

    Connect with Ms. Swails
    Ms. Swails on Twitter

    Resources
    Dr. Wang’s Slides from the ASCP Annual Meeting 2023
    ‘NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a Biological Definition of Alzheimer’s Disease’ in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • Tests that are designed in-house to fulfill a clinical need (but aren’t FDA approved) qualify as laboratory developed tests. And these LDTs are currently regulated by CLIA. But the FDA is proposing a new rule that would give them oversight of the design and development of laboratory developed tests. So, what does that mean for us? How would this new legislation impact everyday practice inside the lab?

    On this episode of the podcast, your hosts, Ms. Kelly Swails, MLS(ASCP), and Dr. Ali Brown, MD, FASCP, are joined by Dr. Gregory Sossaman, MD, Clinical Pathologist and Service Line Lead for Pathology and Lab Medicine at Ochsner Health, Dr. Jonathan Genzen, MD, Clinical Pathology Professor at the University of Utah and Chief Medical Officer and Senior Director of Government Affairs at ARUP Laboratories, and Mr. Matthew Schulze, Senior Director for the Center for Public Policy at ASCP, to discuss the implications of the proposed FDA regulations for LDTs.

    Our panelists share their anxiety around the labor and costs involved in complying with the new rule and describe how lab professionals might be forced into situations where we deny care due to regulations. Listen in to understand why public opinion favors the proposed rule and learn how to share your concerns with the FDA during the public comment period from October 3rd to December 4th, 2023.

    Topics Covered

    · How tests that are not FDA approved but designed in-house to fulfill a clinical need fall into the category of laboratory developed tests
    · Examples of common LDTs used in academic medical centers + large community health systems
    · The current regulations re: performance standards for LDTs under CLIA
    · Dr. Sossaman, Dr. Genzen & Mr. Schulze’s concerns around the labor and costs involved in complying with the proposed FDA rule
    · The lack of clarity re: what modifications to FDA approved tests would be allowed under the proposed regulations
    · How direct-to-consumer testing, the pandemic and technological advances influenced the proposed FDA rule and why the general public is in favor of it
    · How the proposed FDA regulations would affect our ability to respond in future pandemics

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Dr. Sossaman
    Dr. Sossaman on LinkedIn

    Connect with Dr. Genzen
    Dr. Genzen on LinkedIn

    Connect with Mr. Schulze
    Mr. Schulze on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Brown
    Ms. Swails on Twitter
    Dr. Brown on Twitter

    Resources
    ASCP Membership 2024
    Proposed FDA Regulation of Laboratory Developed Tests
    Public Comment on the FDA’s Proposed Rule
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • Working on the bench can feel like being in a black box. And as important as it is to advocate for patients, pathologists and laboratory professionals rarely have direct access to them.

    So, what can we do to encourage patient-centered care in the medical laboratory?

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, your hosts, Ms. Kelly Swails, MLS(ASCP), and Dr. Lotte Mulder, PhD, are joined by three members of the laboratory staff at University Hospital in San Antonio, Ms. Carrie Bartosh, MLS(ASCP), SV, Laboratory Supervisor in the Microbiology Department, Ms. Claudia Courtright, MLS(ASCP), Technical Supervisor in Microbiology Services, and Mr. Scott Bowman, MLS(ASCP), Bench Technologist, to discuss patient advocacy in the laboratory.

    Our panelists describe what laboratories can do to promote a culture of patient-centered care, sharing examples of situations when they advocated for patients from the bench and what they wish people knew about the value of the work done in the medical laboratory.

    Listen in for Ms. Bartosh, Ms. Courtright, and Mr. Bowman’s advice for laboratory professionals on avoiding burnout and learn how your laboratory can establish processes that support patient-centered care.

    Topics Covered
    · How frontline laboratory professionals can advocate for patients from the bench
    · Instances of advocating for patients and how working in a culture of safety empowered those situations
    · What the University Health laboratory does to continuously evaluate and improve its patient-centered care practices
    · What laboratories can do to promote a culture of patient-centered care
    · Why a punitive culture in the laboratory is not conducive to patient-centered care
    · Examples of processes that support patient-centered care
    · Advice to laboratory professionals on how to avoid burnout
    · How Ms. Bartosh, Ms. Courtright, and Mr. Bowmanstay motivated to focus on advocacy
    · Why laboratory professionals rarely have an opportunity to involve patients in the decision-making process around laboratory testing and results interpretation (and how impactful it is when they do)
    · What our panelists wish patients knew about the value of the work we do in the medical laboratory

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Ms. Bartosh, Ms. Courtright & Mr. Bowman
    University Health Laboratory Services
    Ms. Bartosh on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Brown
    Ms. Swails on Twitter
    Dr. Mulder on Twitter

    Resources
    CAP Inspection Checklists
    ASCP Patient Champions Program
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • We know that diverse teams perform better. In laboratory medicine, diversity, equity, and inclusion in leadership not only inspires young professionals, it also promotes retention in a profession that struggles with staffing shortages.

    So, what’s stopping us from increasing representation and equity in laboratory leadership?

    What can we do to recruit a more diverse pool of job applicants and then support them in growing into lab leadership and management roles?

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, your hosts, Ms. Kelly Swails, MLS(ASCP), and Dr. Lotte Mulder, PhD, are joined by Ms. Lona Gordon Small, MLS(ASCP), MBA, Quality Specialist at the Johns Hopkins Hospital Core Lab and coach and Founder of LabOPEX Training and Consulting, Dr. Marissa J. White, MD, FASCP, Surgical Pathologist and Deputy Director for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion at Johns Hopkins, and Mr. Mohamed Abdelmonem, MBA-HCM, MSc, MLS(ASCP)SBB, Blood Bank Specialist and Transfusion and Reference Lab Supervisor at STEM Healthcare, to discuss diversity, equity and inclusion strategies for the medical lab.

    Our panelists explain the common barriers to expanding representation among laboratory leadership and explore effective strategies for mentoring underrepresented groups in management roles.

    Listen in for Ms. Small, Dr. White, and Mr. Abdelmonem’s insight on establishing equity around pay and promotion and learn what educational institutions and professional organizations can do to promote representation at all levels of the laboratory workforce!

    Topics Covered
    · The crucial need to increase representation in laboratory leadership and management positions
    · Common barriers to expanding representation and equity in laboratory leadership
    · What educational institutions and professional organizations can do to promote representation and equity in the laboratory workforce
    · The benefits of equity around pay and promotion in the medical lab
    · Effective strategies for mentoring and supporting underrepresented groups in laboratory leadership roles
    · Strategies to identify and recruit a more diverse pool of job applicants for roles in the medical laboratory

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Ms. Small
    Ms. Small on LinkedIn

    Connect with Dr. White
    Dr. White at Johns Hopkins

    Connect with Mr. Abdelmonem
    Mr. Abdelmonem on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Mulder
    Ms. Swails on Twitter
    Dr. Mulder on Twitter

    Resources
    eLABorate Topics Podcast
    Mass General Brigham’s Mentoring Across Differences
    Positive Intelligence by Shirzad Chamine
    ASCP Mentorship Program
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • Would you benefit from having a mentor to help you grow as a pathologist or laboratory professional? How might you benefit from becoming a mentor yourself?

    We get further, faster, with support, and having the right mentor accelerates your personal and professional development.

    But how do you find a good mentor? And what can you do to make the mentor-mentee relationship successful?

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, your hosts, Ms. Kelly Swails, MT(ASCP), and Dr. Lotte Mulder, PhD, are joined by Dr. Nathan Johnson, PhD, FACHE, MASCP, DLM(ASCP), Chair of Laboratory Sciences at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas,Ms. Tywauna Wilson, MBA, MLS(ASCP)CM, System Technical Director of Chemistry for CompuNet Clinical Laboratories and President of Trendy Elite Coaching, and Dr. Russell Broaddus, MD, PhD, Chair of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine at Chapel Hill, to discuss mentorship in the laboratory.

    Our panelists explore the characteristics of a good mentor, explaining why mentorship is important at ALL levels of your career and where to look for mentorship as a pathologist or laboratory professional.

    Listen in for examples of how Dr. Johnson, Ms. Wilson, and Dr. Broaddus have benefitted from serving as mentors and learn how to maximize the benefits of a mentor-mentee relationship in the medical lab.

    Topics Covered
    · What inspired Dr. Johnson, Ms. Wilson, and Dr. Broaddus to become mentors
    · Why our panelists look to mentor in the areas of leadership and career development
    · How experienced laboratory professionals can learn from their younger colleagues
    · The characteristics of a good mentor
    · What makes the mentor-mentee relationship work
    · What questions you should ask yourself before saying YES to mentoring someone
    · Insight on where to look for a mentor
    · Common mistakes people make in looking for a mentor
    · Why mentorship is important at ALL levels of your laboratory career
    · How our panelists have benefited from serving as mentors
    · What you can do to maximize your mentor-mentee relationships in the lab

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Dr. Johnson
    Dr. Johnson at the University of Arkansas
    Dr. Johnson on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Wilson
    Trendy Elite Coaching
    Ms. Wilson on Twitter
    Ms. Wilson on LinkedIn

    Connect with Dr. Broaddus
    Dr. Broaddus at UNC School of Medicine
    Dr. Broaddus on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Mulder
    Ms. Swails on Twitter
    Dr. Mulder on Twitter

    Resources
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • What inspires a doctor to pursue pathology?

    Dr. Elvio Silva, MD, was drawn to pathology because it’s the only specialty in medicine where you can SEE the disease. And his patient-centered approach to studying tumors has led to breakthrough research.

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, Dr. Silva, Professor in the Department of Pathology at MD Anderson Cancer Center, joins our hosts, Ms. Kelly Swails, MLS(ASCP), and Dr. Ali Brown, MD, FASCP, to discuss his storied career as a gynecologic pathologist.

    Dr. Silva explains the two kinds of pathology research, describing what inspired his revolutionary work in grading endocervical adenocarcinomas and why it’s crucial for medical journals to make room for new ideas.

    Listen in for insight on deciding between a career in academics versus private practice and find out what Dr. Silva learned from his most challenging cases in the diverse field of gynecologic pathology.

    Topics Covered
    · Dr. Silva’s accidental journey to becoming a gynecologic pathologist
    · How pathology is the only specialty where you can SEE the disease and why Dr. Silva views that as the best part of pathology
    · Dr. Silva’s response to people who say pathologists aren’t real doctors
    · How Dr. Silva thinks about deciding between academics vs. private practice
    · The two kinds of pathology research and what draws people to research that involves understanding a disease
    · What Dr. Silva says to people who are intimidated by the diversity in gynecologic pathology
    · Why it’s challenging for pathologists to recognize when we’re wrong
    · The publications Dr. Silva is most proud of (and why those papers were initially rejected)
    · Examples of challenging cases and how they illustrate pitfalls pathologists should avoid
    · Why it’s crucial for societies and journals to make room for people with new and unusual ideas
    · Concerns around the training of pathology residents

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Dr. Silva
    Dr. Silva on Twitter
    Dr. Silva on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Brown
    Ms. Swails on Twitter
    Dr. Brown on Twitter

    Resources
    Dr. Silva on ResearchGate
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • Are you dreaming of moving up the ladder and transitioning to a management position in the laboratory? Or maybe even a leadership role outside the lab?

    What can you do to learn the leadership skills you need to take that next step in your career?

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, your hosts, Ms. Kelly Swails, MLS(ASCP), and Dr. Lotte Mulder, PhD, are joined by Dr. Gary Procop, MD, MS, CEO of the American Board of Pathology, Ms. Anne Walsh-Feeks, MS, PA(ASCP), FACHE, Assistant Dean and COO for Ambulatory Operations at Stony Brook Medicine in Stony Brooke, New York, and Ms. Carol Gomes, MS, FACHE, CPHQ, MASCP, MT(ASCP)HTL, DLM, CEO and COO at Stony Brook University Hospital, to discuss the transition to leadership outside the laboratory.

    Our panelists discuss their journeys to leadership roles, sharing the resources they found helpful in making the transition and offering advice for laboratory professionals considering management positions in or outside the lab. Listen in for our panelists' insight on building leadership experience through volunteering and learn to leverage the skills you’re honing in the lab to advance your career!

    Topics Covered
    · Career advice for laboratory professionals who wish to move into a management position
    · Why it is important to maintain your clinical role during the transition to management
    · Leadership skills learned from volunteering with professional associations
    · How to take advantage of tuition reimbursement programs to further your education
    · Skills learned working in the lab that can contribute career progression
    · The pivotal events responsible for our panelists' transition to leadership outside the lab
    · Advice for clinicians who want to make the leap to leadership roles outside the lab
    · Certifications and degrees our panelists found helpful in making the transition to leadership
    · What our panelists would do differently in their careers given the opportunity
    · What our panelists miss about working in the lab

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Dr. Procop
    Dr. Procop at the American Board of Pathology
    Dr. Procop on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Walsh-Feeks
    Ms. Walsh-Feeks on Twitter
    Ms. Walsh-Feeks on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Gomes
    Ms. Gomes at Stony Brook University
    Ms. Gomes on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Mulder
    Ms. Swails on Twitter
    Dr. Mulder on Twitter

    Resources
    American Association of Pathologists’ Assistants
    NYU’s Advanced Management Program for Clinicians
    NAHQ’s CPHQ Certification
    ACHE’s FACHE Certification
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • Do you cut corners when it comes to laboratory safety?

    Little things like carrying your cell phone, rolling up the sleeves of your lab coat, or skipping the hurricane drill don’t seem like a big deal in the moment. But when you consider the potential risks to you, your colleagues, your family, and anyone else you might encounter, even small safety violations can have a big impact.

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, your hosts, Ms. Kelly Swails, MT(ASCP), and Dr. Ali Brown, MD, FASCP, are joined by Mr. Sean Kaufman, MPH, CPH, IFBA-CP, CEO and Founding Partner of Safer Behaviors, Dr. Jason Nagy, PhD, MLS(ASCP), QLS, Laboratory Safety Support Coordinator for Sentara Healthcare, and Mr. Dan Scungio, MT(ASCP), SLS, CQA(ASQ), Laboratory Safety Consultant and Laboratory Safety Officer at Sentara Healthcare, to discuss the most common safety issues facing today’s medical labs.

    Our panelists explore the risks involved in having our cell phones in the medical laboratory and explain why so many leaders fail to hold their teams accountable for laboratory safety.

    Mr. Kaufman, Dr. Nagy, and Mr. Scungio describe why effective education is key in establishing a safety culture in the lab and how some of the things we do for the sake of safety increase our risk.

    Listen in for insight on effective emergency management planning and learn how to protect yourself and others from the greatest safety risks we face in the medical lab.

    Topics Covered
    · The top 10 safety issues facing today’s medical laboratories
    · The surprising personal items that have been found in drawers during lab safety audits
    · Examples of specimen transport safety issues
    · The 3 Cs of transferring specimens—coordination, communication, and common courtesy
    · The risks involved in having cell phones in the medical laboratory
    · Why effective education is key in establishing a safety culture in the lab (and what that looks like)
    · Advice on preparing for emergencies that don’t occur often
    · How laboratory leaders fail to hold their teams accountable for lab safety
    · How we cut corners around PPE compliance (lab coats, goggles and face shields)
    · The challenges around defining clean vs. dirty areas of the laboratory
    · Why most laboratories are lacking when it comes to chemical and waste management
    · How some of the things we do for the sake of safety increase our risk
    · How human risk factors (i.e.: interpersonal conflict, mental and emotional fitness, etc.) are the greatest safety risks we face in the medical laboratory

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Mr. Kaufman
    Safer Behaviors
    Mr. Kaufman on LinkedIn

    Connect with Dr. Nagy
    Sentara Healthcare
    Dr. Nagy on LinkedIn

    Connect with Mr. Scungio
    Dan the Lab Safety Man
    Mr. Scungio on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Swails & Dr. Brown
    Ms. Swails on Twitter
    Dr. Brown on Twitter

    Resources
    Lablogatory
    OSHA
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • Are you ready for Medical Laboratory Professionals Week?

    Our annual celebration of pathologists and medical laboratory professionals begins April 23, 2023, and this year’s theme is Saved by the Lab, a play on the popular sitcom from the 1990s, Saved by the Bell. In honor of Zack Morris and friends from Bayside High, we’re revisiting the ‘90s to explore what was going on in the world—and the world of laboratory medicine.

    On this LIVE episode of Inside the Lab, your host, Ms. Kelly Swails, MLS(ASCP), is joined by Dr. Robert A. Goulart, MD, MASCP, FCAP, Associate Chief of Anatomic Pathology and Director of Quality and Patient Safety at the University of Massachusetts Memorial Health System and President-Elect of ASCP, Mr. Sean McNair, MPH, Cytology Education Coordinator at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Program Director for the Cytology Training Program at Hunter College, Ms. Stephanie Y. Whitehead, MPH, MBA, MLS(ASCP), Executive Director of Pathology and Laboratory Services at University Health System in San Antonio, Texas, and Chair Elect for the Council of Laboratory Professionals, and Dr. Constantine Kanakis, MD, MSc, MLS(ASCP), Resident Physician at Loyola Medicine in Chicago and Member of the ASCP Patient Champions Advisory Board, for a ‘90s trivia showdown.

    Our panelists answer questions about ‘90s pop culture, including the highest grossing movies, chart-topping music and hottest toys of the decade.Dr. Goulart, Mr. McNair, Ms. Whitehead and Dr. Kanakis also test their knowledge of noteworthy lab news from the ‘90s. Listen in to find out which of our panelists took home the coveted prize, a tote bag filled with Saved by the Lab gear!

    Topics Covered
    · Popular ‘90s trends such as the Tamagotchi, Tickle Me Elmo, Harry Potter and reality television
    · ‘90s pop culture trivia, e.g.: the most-watched episode of TV, highest grossing movie and chart-topping music of the decade
    · Lab-specific ‘90s trivia like when ASCP elected a laboratory professional to the Board of Directors for the first time or how many lab professionals were working in the US at that time
    · Noteworthy laboratory news from the ‘90s, including Marie Gatscha’s testimony to Congress on behalf of ASCP, the revision of the WHO Blue Book on bone tumors, and trastuzumab’s impact on breast cancer treatment

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP
    ASCP on Facebook
    ASCP on Instagram
    ASCP on Twitter

    Connect with Dr. Goulart
    Dr. Goulart on LinkedIn

    Connect with Mr. McNair
    Mr. McNair on LinkedIn

    Connect with Ms. Whitehead
    Ms. Whitehead on LinkedIn
    Ms. Whitehead on Twitter
    Ms. Whitehead on Instagram

    Connect with Dr. Kanakis
    Dr. Kanakis on LinkedIn
    Dr. Kanakis on Twitter
    Dr. Kanakis at Loyola Pathology

    Connect with Ms. Swails
    Ms. Swails on Twitter

    Resources
    ASCP Lab Week Resources
    Inside the Lab in the ASCP Store

  • The medical laboratory is often seen as a black box that generates definitive results with little effort. But it’s not always that simple.

    What if you work up a culture and find an unusual bacteria or fungus? What do the technologists in the microbiology laboratory do to investigate these uncommon cases and provide their patients with a proper diagnosis?

    On this episode of Inside the Lab, our hosts, Ms. Kelly Swails, MLS(ASCP), and Dr. Ali Brown, MD, FASCP, are joined by Dr. Clare McCormick-Baw, MD, FASCP, Medical Director of Infectious Diseases Serology and Molecular Microbiology at Parkland Health in Dallas, Texas, and Assistant Professor in the Department of Pathology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dr. Andrew Clark, PhD, D(ABMM), Medical Directory of the Microbiology Laboratory at Clements University Hospital and Assistant Professor at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and Dr. Laura Filkins, PhD, D(ABMM), Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Director at Children’s Health System of Texas in Dallas, Texas, and Assistant Professor of Pathology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, to share their most interesting microbiology cases.

    Dr. Clark discusses an immunosuppressed 73-year-old man with persistent diarrhea who was diagnosed with invasive GI mucormycosis, and Dr. McCormick-Baw describes the case of the healthy 51-year-old woman whose abdominal fullness was caused by coccidioidomycosis, not cancer. Listen in for Dr. Filkins’ insight on getting the CDC involved when a four-year-old patient contracted Burkholderia pseudomallei and learn how committed clinical laboratory scientists kept digging until they found answers for these three unique patients!

    Topics Covered
    · Dr. Clark’s case of an immunosuppressed 73-year-old man with persistent diarrhea
    · How Dr. Clark’s team found Mucor mold in their patient’s stool culture and diagnosed him with invasive GI mucormycosis
    · How rare GI mucormycosis is and why it’s nearly always terminal
    · Dr. McCormick-Baw’s case of a healthy 51-year-old woman who presented with abdominal fullness
    · How Dr. McCormick-Baw’s team determined that their patient did not have cancer but did have coccidioidomycosis
    · Why it took two years after Dr. McCormick-Baw’s patient contracted Coccidioides on a hike for symptoms to present
    · Dr. Filkins’ case of a previously healthy four-year-old female (with a colorful animal history) who presented with nausea, vomiting, lethargy and decreased appetite
    · How Dr. Filkins’ team cultured their young patient’s tracheal aspirate specimen and found the high-risk pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei
    · How the local health lab, local epidemiologist and CDC’s joint investigation uncovered four cases of Burkholderia pseudomallei in the U.S. and traced them to aromatherapy bottles manufactured in India
    · How the CDC, EPA and Texas public health agencies discovered that Dr. Filkins’ patient’s pet raccoon died of Burkholderia pseudomallei and decontaminated its burial site

    Connect with ASCP
    ASCP on Twitter
    Connect with Dr. McCormick-Baw
    Dr. McCormick-Baw at UT Southwestern
    Connect with Dr. Clark
    Dr. Clark at UT Southwestern
    Connect with Dr. Filkins
    Dr. Filkins at UT Southwestern
    Resources
    ‘Burkholderia Pseudomalliei Detected in a Raccoon Carcass Linked to a Multistate Aromatherapy-Associated Melioidosis Outbreak’ in Morbidity and Mortality