Episódios
-
There is no transcript available for this episode.
-
Transcript not available for this episode.
-
Estão a faltar episódios?
-
Kate Chopin’s The Awakening—“Dangerously Immersed in Ourselves”
By Karen E.B. Elliott
I remember the first time I read this book. It was back in college was I was earning my B.A. at a liberal arts, secular school. I loved the novel. It intrigued me. Perhaps it was because I identified with the main character as much as I could at the time; however, I certainly wasn’t married yet. I had not been pregnant nor had children to care for. As a woman I was allowed to vote and express basically any opinion I had as a woman. But exactly like the main character, I was white; I was raised with privilege in zipcodes my parents chose carefully in which to live in order to guarantee me of sustaining that privilege. So in that case, I complete “got” Kate Chopin’s main character.
I can recall my male professor’s interpretation of the ending (which I quickly came to learn is mostly everyone’s interpretation), and it just didn’t sit well with me. Even though I really liked him, I felt he was trying too hard—to please the women in the room—as if to say, “Hey ladies, I’m with you on this one.” He, like many of my professors, whether male or female, were self-proclaimed feminists. I, too, was a self-proclaimed feminist, but as a Christian. And that’s a hard one to explain or justify to the secular cynic or faithful Christ-follower. The interpretation of Edna’s apparent suicide (spoiler alert!) at the novel’s end appears to be read out of context in a frightening post-modern analysis of literature—where our feelings about the text (or any text) determine its meaning.
This approach raises serious questions, and any self-proclaimed intellectual would raise his or her eyebrows when anyone looks at a text in this manner. Interestingly enough, however, this is exactly what Edna does with her own life. Although Chopin wrote this at the turn of the 20th century, her main character is incredibly post-modern, and more accurately, Edna is the post-modern middle to upper class American. Whether Christian or secular, Edna represents the typical American who already has it all—everything’s going for her—but she wants more. Despite her education and wealth, she is trapped, but not by the very oppressive, anti-woman Louisiana society in which she lives—she is trapped by her inability to bow down to anyone or anything larger than herself. It is evident as the reader travels through her consciousness that she has an acute sense of God and His presence; in fact, she admits that “the Holy Ghost [has] vouchsafed wisdom” within her youthful mind and soul, but she is seduced by her own desires to do whatever she wants, no matter who it hurts (13).
Kate Chopin’s craft and technique is nothing short of inspiring. On the surface she appears to be a transcendentalist as Edna goes to the water and within nature to find herself—to find the answers of life—but she does no transcending of any kind; in fact, Chopin turns on her reader in not-so-subtle ways. Although at first, nature seems to “speak to the soul. The touch of the sea is sensuous, enfolding the body in its soft, close embrace,” and yet, when Edna enters the ocean with the intent to transcend, Chopin reminds the reader that the sea is not Edna’s native element; she had “attempted all summer to learn to swim. She had received instructions from both the men and women; in some instances even the children…A certain ungovernable dread hung about her when in the water, unless there was a hand nearby that might reach out and reassure her” (13; 27). Chopin furthers the futility of Edna’s efforts with her strong description of the ocean, and she intentionally recycles phrases—reuses them—particularly at the novel’s end so that her reader will be reminded of what’s really happening to her character. Like the natural elements, Chopin seduces her reader and invites them to look at nature’s veneer. She describes the sea as swelling “lazily in broad billows, -
Transcript unavailable for this episode.
-
Transcript unavailable for this episode. Danah Hashem's Edutopia article on the single point rubric can be accessed here.
-
Cultivating Character in the Classroom.
My name is Renée LaRoche. I am currently teaching Academic English at Lexington Christian Academy. I graduated from LCA in 1992 and it’s wonderful to be back home. For the past fifteen years, I’ve taught in public charter, traditional public, and private schools. I’ve had 3rd, 4th, 7th, and 8th grade classrooms independently, and when my children were young, I substituted for students in Pre-Kindergarten through 12th grade. Regardless of what grade, setting, or role I have found myself, I’ve noticed how important it is for me to cultivate character in my classroom. It is with that energy and passion that I find myself sharing with you today.
Wherever you are, it is my hope that you’ll be able to take whatever works for you and leave the rest. Whether you’re a teacher, a colleague, friend, family member, or if somehow you just happened to find this podcast.. I hope that it speaks to you in some way.
Before I begin, so that you have some background understanding, I am currently teaching seven students who are enrolled in our Academic English and Cultural Immersion Program here at LCA, Each of them are in eighth grade and are in their first or second year here in The States. A main focus of our program is to “develop fluency in English before moving on to Upper School.” My students take Academic English, American Studies, STEM, Arts, Music, and Physical Education. The goal is to prepare them for success in an English-speaking college preparatory school.
LCA is focused on cultivating one’s heart, mind, body, and soul. The first unit of each school-year for me, in my classroom, concentrates on identifying, supporting, and communicating just that. I begin my year by ensuring that my classroom is designed for an optimal learning environment I know that this might mean different things to each person who hears this… For some, it might mean that a classroom library includes all genres. To others, it might mean that flexible seating is available. Whatever systems or physical environments feel right to you, I support that. I, personally, love color, comfort, and order. Therefore, my classrooms have always included brightness, organization, and flexible seating options. A tool that I’ve used to create sacred learning spaces for me is the book, “Creating the Peaceable Classroom” by Sandy Bothmer. Even if you’re not into Feng Shui or don’t find value in integrating music or movement into your daily routine, as a teacher. I think that we can all agree upon the importance of setting a serene environment. I perceive that it’s a goal for all educators! :) I feel confident that you might find some strategies or advice that could yield amazing results, wherever you find yourself.
After initial icebreaker activities are over, my students’ first academic creation is to write I AM poems in where they share who they are and who they wish to be with their class. The website, “Read/Write/Think” has fantastic exemplars, which I’ve used over the years. That being said, being that this type of activity is so common for “back to school” or “get to know you” activities, a simple Google search would yield similar templates.
In the first week of school, after the routines are reviewed, I find that the most impactful area of focus is on character. Having that as a baseline is truly foundational. Within a week of getting to know my students, I give them a list of 143 Character Trait Vocabulary Words. If you teach, you might revise this list, according to your students. Being that my students are English Language Learners, when they receive this list, it’s overwhelming as their vocabulary is several grade levels behind native English Language students’. I use Marzano’s six-step process to learn vocabulary as I have found that it promotes better retention and application. Therefore, I provide a description, explanation, or example for each of the words, -
Transcript not available for this episode.
-
Transcript not available for this episode.
-
Margaret Mitchell’s Gone with the Wind—“A Good Woman is Hard to Find”
By Karen E. B. Elliott,
English Department Faculty
February 26, 2019
Margaret Mitchell was once quoted as saying that “in a time of weakness, I wrote a novel.” Well, if writing one of the most read, translated, and published novels in the world was a weakness, I am sorry that she died so young that we’d never get to see her strengths.
I decided to teach this novel a few years ago, and without a doubt, for most of my students, whether male or female, black or white, it’s their favorite. There are few novels whose characterization is so rich, even for the minor characters. At first, however, many of my students struggle—the novel is distinctly Southern—and for most of my beloved Northern, New England, so-called Progressive Massachusetts types, Mitchell dispels a lot of myths. She openly condemns Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and she attacks a couple of women from Maine in one particular scene (where they make racist remarks to Uncle Peter) that will make you want to change those coastal vacation plans.
Mitchell shows that racism is not just a Southern problem, nor is it still. It’s a Northern one. And according to Mitchell, what makes the Northerners far worse than the Southerners is that behind their supposed intellect, their apparent logic, and progressive politics, you’ve got a region of hypocrites who wear anti-slavery superhero capes, but what they’re really after is money, profit, political support, and all for the building of a new economy based on the rise of industrialization. The heart of the matter is accurately expressed by the famous Rhett Butler who not only predicts the war’s outcome, but also accurately pegs (and despises) the root of most issues—it’s hypocrisy. He says to Scarlett, “It’s only hypocrites like you, my dear lady, just as black at heart but trying to hide it, who become enraged when called by their right names” (Mitchell 223). This definitely applies to all of us, as the American way is to wear your best façade to church, work, school, or on your college application.
As Christians, then, it is easy to identify with Scarlett, despite what we feel for or about her. She does not stand for any cause which will actually cost her anything. She is truly ambivalent—we are attracted to her because we support her ability to survive and beat the odds, to play the world at their own game and seemingly win, but we are repulsed by some of her choices and what drives her to make them. I have found that characters my students struggle with the most are the ones we can most identify with. She is, as Rhett declared, a hypocrite. She feigns righteousness when she needs to get something, and her true nature arises when she is cornered like a cat. She can be vicious. And at the heart of it all, she doesn’t really care that much about what other people think—only if it means that it exempts her from the best parties. She covets another woman’s husband; she marries her sister’s fiancé, but she loves her home and will do anything to save it, even if it means offering herself physically. “I won’t let the Yankees [the world] lick [or take advantage of] me” she continually says, and don’t we all feel this way? She lives in a world that clearly doesn’t respect women—certainly does not acknowledge their intellect—and she knows that the world revolves around money, so she will do anything to get it, and all the time she rationalizes this acquisition. She does believe in God, but she does not trust that He has her best interests in mind; in fact, she doesn’t believe that anyone does. In many ways, she is the quintessential American woman, which is not flattering.
Mitchell, however, does not allow her reader to laud her main character or rationalize her choices, much like we Christians like to do. Scarlett is contrasted by Melanie Hamilton Wilkes, who Rhett claims (and makes no other claim like it about any other woman i... -
There is not a transcript available for this podcast, but, for more details on the content of this post, view Danah Hashem's NCTE blog post here.
-
Transcript not available for this episode.
-
Transcript not available for this episode.
-
Alan Paton’s Too Late, the Phalarope—“Scarlet Letters in the Modern Age”
By Karen E.B. Elliott
Alan Paton wrote only three novels—the first he destroyed; the second is his most famous (Cry, the Beloved Country), and then his third is ridiculously painful to read. But it’s so amazingly good, and so apropos for our students, especially as we live in and confront the tempting, technological age. Although this novel takes place in South Africa post-WWII, and although it’s about the other whites, the non-English Afrikaners—the Boers, original Dutch settlers of Africa’s cape—it’s about good, old fashioned sin and our human nature to give into it, to hide it, to indulge in it further, and then to ask God in perverted prayer, “My God, why have you forsaken me?”
Blameshifting, unfortunately, is nothing new. Adam did it to Eve, and then Eve did it to the devil. It seems that the first sin is Biblical self-indulgence (if eating of the fruit is metaphorical), and it’s the inability to want to be honest—not only with God, but each other (especially the ones we claim to love), and even ourselves. What is new, however, is that due to technology, we don’t necessarily even need to blameshift. With the click of a mouse or the subtle movement of our thumbs, we can open an icon, browse, and then for too many who are savvy, delete the evidence as best we can. Personally, I think the internet is the devil’s playground. Our good intentions to use it wisely and for good quickly submit to distractions…and too often, dangerous rabbit holes that make Lewis Carroll’s world look more like “The Hundred Acre Wood.” It’s the new realm where evil can work incredibly effectively as it lodges itself into our souls like a stubborn splinter—mostly because we’re hiding our indulgences with too-great-of-ease, and then we’re heading to our classrooms, our church pews, the pulpits, the board meetings, our dinner-dates, or T-ball games all in the name of the Lord, when all the while we’re headed toward destruction, and maybe even to our personal hells, while destroying our families and too often even the greater communities in which we strive to live and serve.
Whether you’re Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim or nothing at all, confession in the 21st century is not in our everyday vocabulary. We don’t need it; after all, if you’re “born again,” baptized, circumcised or bowing upon your mat, we’re all set. Plus, we’ve got Dr. Oz, Phil and of course Oprah and the Personal Growth section of Barnes and Noble, or worse, we’ve got those few family members or friends from prayer group who help us rationalize our sin because after all as an Evangelical, it’s very important to understand where the secular world is coming from. We’re just trying to live in the world, but most of the time, we are of it. We have, or shall we say temptation has, convinced us that by understanding the other guy’s point of view, we’re really leading them to the Kingdom. But as the narrator of Too Late, the Phalarope declares, “because [he] did not entreat or repent, he was destroyed…[and we] were destroyed with him” (Paton 4). This novel is a necessary read. It convicts and re-convicts its reader. Like the protagonist and anti-hero, Pieter, the reader can identify with the terror of being discovered when we know we’ve indulged too much in our sin, and when we pray, like Pieter, “it was another mercy that he sought, not to be saved from sin, but from its consequence” (157).
The novel is not like Cry, the Beloved Country which is characteristically Christian and accepted as such even at secular, liberal institutions due to its African and multi-cultural setting. Too Late, the Phalarope is much harder to swallow. It goes deeper into the faith where many Christians are frightened to go. Paton’s characters are in fact deeply committed Christians. Their questions are not about God’s existence, is He real, or whether or not He is in fact absolute truth. No, -
Transcript not available for this episode.
-
Transcript not available for this episode.
-
“How I Manage My Classroom: A Balancing Act”
By Karen E. B. Elliott,
English Faculty (1997-the present)
I always find it interesting how classes formulate—not according to a schedule, or what a student desires to take to graduate, or even what “track” they’ve chosen. Whenever my classes meet, within the first few weeks of school, each section becomes their own entity—their individual personalities come together and sort-of become “one” being. What I love about this is that each section, therefore, has different needs…even though I might be teaching all the seniors the same text. I love it because each class/section will look at a text differently depending on their individual and collective personalities, and as a result, I get to “see” a text in a new way with each group. Consequently, what has resonated most with myself is the three categories of how students learn: Sequential, Global and Exploratory.
I have realized that I do all three in one hour…which either means that I’m confused, or perhaps by default, I have learned over the years that the students do best with a balance. Often I will begin class with grammar, historical lecture, or a pop quiz which helps with my Sequential learners who tend to “respond to logic, order and sequence and work best with information that is presented methodically” (Willis 57). After this, I will often put students into groups—randomly chosen, and never the same kids together—to spend some time reflecting on specific topics/questions regarding the text, but at the same time giving them space to “enjoy discovery [and] frees them to experiment, create [different theories]…and explore their [literary] environment rather than be restricted by overly structured lessons”; however, little do these Exploratory learners realize, things are actually structured by myself, but they get the “interpersonal” engagement with their peers, which actually helps them focus and eventually present their ideas to the larger group (Willis 58). Next, I’ll have everyone come to “Discussion Group.” Someone turns off the classroom lights, and someone else turns on lamps as we gather together in different chairs, sit on the carpet with cozy pillows, someone boldly likes sitting in my desk chair, and if others like, they can even stay at a table as long as we come together to discuss what they’ve done in group work. This is great for all types of learners because they are moving around, recharging, and they are used to the cues. Here, however, at “Discussion Group,” the Global learners have it—here, they get to “connect a new general topic to something more concrete” (58). Here, we make connections from the literature to the practical, and make things more applicable/personal.
What is always challenging, however, is when one particular “Learning Group” dominates a class. This is like ordering a prime rib but getting scallops wrapped in bacon. Both are great, but sometimes they don’t always go together because someone’s allergic to fish. As a teacher, however, this is what’s on the menu. This is your class. Own it. Know that nothing is a coincidence and that God has more faith in you than you might have in yourself. If He thinks you can create the balance, then you can.
Willis, Judy. Brain-Friendly Strategies for the Inclusion Classroom. ACSD: Alexandria VA, 2007.
-
Transcript not available for this episode.
-
Transcript not available for this episode.
-
“As a Christian Teacher, ‘Life is a Highway’”
Karen E. B. Elliott,
English Faculty (1997-present)
On more than one occasion, I will have a frustrated student sigh and boldly ask, “Mrs. Elliott, why do we have to read this?” It’s a fair question, so instead of getting defensive because they’ve just attacked one of the so-called greatest works of literature and it’s also a personal favorite (which might be why we’re reading it), I ask the entire class, “All right, why do we read this? Why should we?” After that, a great conversation inevitably ensues; however, if I let it, things start to evolve. For each student it gets personal.
Naturally, questions create controversy, and controversy is not always fun—especially at a Christian school. As an English teacher, this is where the fun begins and where class size is always an issue—the more students, the more questions—and I’ve got Milton and that other Shakespeare play to finish before midterm exams?! Classroom management suddenly feels like “whack-a-mole” and I can’t get them to remember the difference between denotation and connotation. This is when it gets challenging and frustrating at an Evangelical, international, inter-dominational Christian school. I have to cover all this, and lead them to Christ!
And yet, Christ is exactly the only reason I am here. My subject is just a medium. It is through my passion for literature which Christ (in spite of my sinful self) works through me and somehow draws students toward Him. And I don’t know why we are surprised when God does this through secular works written by people who don’t believe in Him, at least not publicly. Yet, we are all made in the image of God, and many authors unknowingly further our relationship to the One who has forgiven them, too, even if they have no inkling that they need forgiveness…even if a few of their ideas are, quite frankly, unforgivable. Am I any different? And yet, God uses even me to help a particular student with serious questions—ones that will eventually determine their eternal life.
I am a marked woman. I have been asked to boldly and with great difficulty and elegance keep one foot in the world, but the other one under-no-circumstances not of it. Teaching literature at a well-known, high-standard, Christian school in Boston-proper is nothing short of challenging. I must be careful. As an intellectual and Evangelical in the classroom, I feel as though I’m driving along the Pacific Highway. I’m so close to the rising paganistic-atheistic edge, that if I let my intellect or ego get the best of me, I teeter into the abyss and end up over my head in the eternal waters; however, if I trust in God, which is so difficult to do most of the time, I’ve got my best foot anchored to His side, and the journey is beautiful and He shows me the world in His proper perspective.
This is what I hope to do with my students as we peer into the world, become aware of the jagged edges, the seductive and engulfing waters below, and how to help each other face the challenges it takes to journey in this beautiful but dark world where most of the time, the guardrails are few and far between.
When I review literary terms with my AP class, we often revisit “irony.” It’s not what happens is unexpected or the opposite. Irony is what was intended becomes the opposite.
And ironically, many of my students are brought to Christ through much of the literature that we explore in class. It’s through some of the most famous authors who unknowingly draw us unto the One who led them to inkwell or typewriter that reinforce my beloved students’ beliefs that there is absolute Truth and an all-knowing God who loves them, and asks much of them, but will, and has already, journeyed the worst road possible. -
Danah: This is Danah Hashem speaking and, for this episode, our 8th episode, we wanted to deviate from some of the patterns we’ve been following in this podcast so far because we want to pause to reflect on and honor the passing of one of our colleagues, Lori Johnson. If you’ve been following along with the podcast, you may know her from her episode with her daughter, Alex Johnson, on summer reading, from our introductory episode, or you may recognize her voice as the introduction to each of our episodes thus far. What you may not know is that Lori is the true originator of this podcast as a whole. It was her idea, her vision, and her passion for continued growth and exploration in our teaching that created the opportunities and the motivation we needed to get this podcast off the ground. She’s the reason this podcasts exists, and so it seemed important that this podcast acknowledge in some small way her passing.
On this past November 7th, we lost Lori suddenly and unexpectedly. The depth and breadth of this loss is overwhelming. This podcast represents the tiniest, most microscopic fraction of the ways in which Lori kindly and gently inspired us all to push ourselves to be better and to continue our learning. And so, in honor of all she did and all she left behind, we want to dedicate this podcast to Lori, and we want to take some time to reflect on the power for goodness that a loving, driven, and thoughtful teacher can have on the people and places around them.
And so many of the members of the LCA community who have contributed to and supported the production of this podcast have taken the time to share briefly about the impact that Lori had on their lives and pedagogy. As we hear their words, we’d like to thank you for being a part of this episode, and honoring Lori alongside us.
Rebecca: So, my name is Rebecca Lefroy, and I’m the newest hire here in the English department at LCA. Lori hired me in June, and I still remember my first meeting with her which was I think supposed to be a short meeting, but maybe went on for 2-3 hours in which we talked about all things education and, from that moment, I could see her enthusiasm for students, her enthusiasm for reading, her enthusiasm for, um, professional development and innovative pedagogy, and all those things were only confirmed when I came to work with her in September. Um, Lori and I taught middle school English together, and she had a whole wealth of information on middle school students and how best to teach them English. I would so often go to her for book recommendations for students. If you had a really specific need for a book for a student, she would know exactly what book would be best. She knew young adult literature inside and out, and was just so perfectly suited to that role, so, from a middle school english perspective, she will be missed hugely.
She was also my mentor, so we should be meeting right now, and, um, in our mentor meetings, we had such fun discussing not only nitty bitty practical things like how to use the portal and how to report, but bigger ideas about pedagogy, about how to wrap up a lesson effectively, about the point of homework, um, about individual students and how best to address their needs and help them. She was always so available to me. Not only did she give me that full hour, but she would interrupt what looked like much more important conversations with other people to come and help me. She noticed when I looked troubled or worried about something, and she would check up that I was OK. She had a huge heart for developing new teachers, and I’m very sorry that I only got to learn from her for a couple of months.
She also had a huge amount of energy. She had her finger in so many pies in the school, and I’m sure we’ll keep discovering more of those pies. She would come into school before me and leave after me, and I would be exhausted by the end of the day, but she would still be very merry and very jolly, - Mostrar mais
