Episódios
-
Roninbasics.com | Protect yourself from the harmful effects of modern technology.
Welcome to The Adams Archive, where we uncover the hidden truths that shape the world you live in. Hosted by Austin Adams, this podcast digs into real government documents, directives, and secretive policies that influence your life in ways most people don't realize. From domestic surveillance to military power, we expose how these institutions quietly expand their control under the guise of "national security" and "public safety."
Summary: At The Adams Archive, we break down complex issues and provide you with the facts that the mainstream avoids. Each episode analyzes real documents and events that expose how governments and corporations work behind the scenes to control narratives and limit your freedoms. With a focus on newly released government directives, we help you understand how these policies affect your everyday life—and what you can do to stay informed.
Government SurveillanceExplore how government surveillance, particularly through the Patriot Act, has expanded its reach to monitor average citizens. We break down how AI-driven technology and new legislative tactics allow institutions to categorize dissent as "extremism." Learn how speaking your mind could land you on a domestic watchlist.
Election 2024: DOD Directive 5240.01 & DHS Homeland Threat AssessmentThis episode takes an alarming look at the DOD Directive 5240.01, which authorizes the US military to use lethal force on civilians during times of unrest. Alongside the DHS Homeland Threat Assessment 2025, we reveal how these new policies target domestic threats and set the stage for unprecedented government control as the 2024 election approaches.
Weaponized PoliciesWe expose how policies designed to protect have been twisted to suppress rights and civil liberties. Learn how new directives allow for military intervention during civil unrest, and how these powers could be used against citizens. This isn’t just about national security—it’s about control.
Tech & DisinformationDiscover how AI is used to manipulate information, control global narratives, and spread disinformation. Governments and corporations use these tools to shape public opinion and stifle dissent. We break down the role of emerging technologies in this dangerous new frontier.
Call to Action: Don’t miss out—subscribe to The Adams Archive today to stay informed on the topics that really matter. Follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media to dive deeper into each episode. Your support means everything—together, we can uncover the truth behind government policies and safeguard our freedoms.
All the Links:Access all our platforms here: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams----more----
Full Transcription
All right, so if we go down to 3. 4e in this document, it talks about the use of deadly force. And it's essentially what you would expect. If there's an imminent danger, or if he or she is not for a moment pointing a weapon at a person, for example. So even if you're not pointing a weapon at them, he or she has a weapon within reach, or is running for cover carrying a weapon, they can shoot you.
Civilians. So if you're, I don't know, open carrying, and they think that you pose any type of threat, they can just shoot you. Civilians, the military, during civil unrest, right? DoD recognizes and respects paramount value of all human life if less than valuable or less than deadly force can be reasonably expected to accomplish the same result without reasonably increasing the danger to armed DoD personnel.
Deadly force is justified when there is a reasonable belief that the person, the subject of such force, poses an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm to a person Or under the circumstances described in the 3. 4e. So essentially what it's saying is any and all circumstances, if you have a weapon, if you're open carrying, which you have the right to do, or even if you're concealed carrying and somehow they know that you're holding that weapon or have that weapon in the vicinity of you, they could shoot you if they think that you pose any type of threat, you know, the laws that were designed to be weaponized against our enemies.
is now being weaponized against us. So if we go to the document that I'm talking about now, right? So we have those two DoD directives. We understand that. But this is also something I want to point and draw your attention to is, and this is the last thing of this document, then we'll move to the actual National Terrorist Advisory document, which is the USD and I and S approval.
So it says, so this is how they actually get the soldiers. This is the approval process. Um, if the requested personnel exceeds 20 people, then you have to But if it's less than 20 armed military soldiers authorized to use deadly force, you don't. You don't. Within the United States of America. Or, if the duration of the requested assistance exceeds 30 days, so you don't even need approval.
If you get 20 soldiers for 29 days, You don't even need a DOD approval. You don't need to have the Secretary of Defense approve the request. You can just go right around them. Go to the military. They'll send you 20 soldiers for 29 days. And then you can request it again for another 29 days that are authorized to use lethal force on civilians.
Now let's see who they're concerned about, because that's what the DECCS document talks about, or Concerned about, but who, who they're going to start to say poses a risk, right? Now, this document isn't just about that. This talks about foreign foreign enemies as well, and some election interference from Russia and China and what these people are trying to, this isn't just about American citizens, but a large portion of it is a large portion of it is.
All right, let me go ahead and switch this here. So you guys can watch what I'm looking at. Not that. All right. So here we go. Here's your document. Now, if you're on YouTube, you can follow along and actually look at this with us. Uh, let's make that a little bit bigger for you. Okay, here we go.
Here is the document office of intelligence and analysis, Homeland threat assessment, Homeland security 2025. All right. So here is your table of contents talks about the border talks. There's the executive summary. Um, but let's go down and look at some of the stuff that I have outlined here. Um, now if you want this document, I'll send it to you.
Uh, head over to my Instagram, I'll be posting some videos of this. And there'll be a keyword that you can comment that I'll send you both of these. You can also just look up the name of the document on Google and find it yourself, but yeah. Alright, so it says public safety and security. Alright, this is page one.
It says over the next year, domestic and foreign violent extremists, the harmful effects of illegal drugs in adversarial states, seek to exacerbate our divisions, as well as silence criticism for diaspora communities, will pose a threat to public safety and security on the homeland. Specifically, we expect the threat of, threat environment in the United States over the next year will remain high due to a confluence of factors.
These factors include violent extremist responses to domestic, socio political developments, and the 2024 election cycle. Concurrently, adversarial states are Intent on sowing distrust in our institutions, as well as confusion and division in our communities through their maligned influence campaigns, with some actors seeking to boost these efforts during the 2024 election cycle.
These state actors will violate our rule of law and undermine freedom of speech in their efforts to suppress dissidents living in the United States. So what, what it's, What the conversation is that they're having there is like, Oh, it's these violent extremists. It's these foreign adversaries. It's these terrorists out there.
And over here, terrorists that are sowing dis sowing, uh, distrust in our institutions. No. No, you know, what's sowing distrust in our institutions, the lying that's happened over the last four years, you know, what's sowing distrust in our institutions, the continued corruption, and the continued crossover between corporatism and politics, you know, you know, what's sowing distrust in our system, how almost every single one of the high level people in our our government right now are going to find themselves a high level executive position at the organizations that funded them, whether they're foreign or international.
Or domestic to use their terms, right? They're going to, their son's going to be on the Chinese energy board or Ukrainian oil board. Oh yeah. Look at Biden and Pelosi and all of these, these individuals who are powerful, powerful people in our government who have their children on the boards of foreign companies that are state run companies.
By our adversaries. Maybe that's what's destroying this, this, this sowing distrust in the institutions. Maybe it's your lack of response to the terrible situations that it happened in Lahaina or in North Carolina or in Florida. Maybe it's your lack of care surrounding the inflation that's happening.
Maybe it's one of those things. Maybe that's what's sowing distrust is that you're distrustful. Not the fact that foreign and domestic violent extremists have thoughts on political ideologies. So there's that summary. Let's move on. Um, so it says that, uh, and actually we should probably go to the bottom here because what, one thing that I found to be unique in this document is that they, in the national advisory, the national terrorist advisory bulletins, they used to say the full words.
What you'll find in this document is they use all of these acronyms to try and make it so that you can't screenshot this and post it without context. So, So what you'll see is there's these DVE, the HVEs, the FTOs, the, all of these specific acronyms. So I'm going to show you first what those acronyms mean, and then we'll go back to the portion that I just had up there for you.
And here they are. Okay. Definitions and contextual notes. An FTO is a forest, uh, forest, is a foreign terrorist or terrorist organization. So FTO, foreign terrorists. DVE. Domestic violent extremist. Okay. So let's look at the definition of that, which it says is an individual. So a domestic violent extremist, a DVE is an individual based and operating primarily within the United States or its territories without direction or inspiration from a foreign domestic or foreign terrorist group or other foreign power who seeks to further political or social goals wholly, or in part through unethical law or unethical acts, unlawful acts.
Oh my gosh. I'm sorry. Early in the morning, unlawful acts of force or violence, the mere advocacy of political and social positions, political activism, or use of strong language and rhetoric or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics alone does not constitute violent extremism. It may be constitutionally productive, maybe.
Oh, you don't you think that the advocacy of political and social positions or political activism or use of strong rhetoric. Yeah, that is absolutely protected under the Constitution. Maybe constitutionally protected. DVEs can fit within one or multiple categories of ideological motivation and can span a broad range of groups or movements.
INA. Utilizes this term synonymously with domestic terrorist. So your, the mere advocacy may be constitutionally protected, but we're still going to label you as a violent extremist, and they may still use the word domestic terrorist.
So, this is important when we go back and we look at the conversations that we're having. Now, when we look at HVE, HVE is homegrown violent extremist. It's a person with, of any citizenship who has lived or operated primarily in the United States or its territories who advocates, is engaged in, or is preparing to engage in ideologically motivated terrorist activities, including providing support to terrorism.
In furtherance, Of political or social objectives promoted by a foreign terrorist organization. Um, but is acting independently of direction by a foreign terrorist organization. HVS are distinct from traditional domestic terrorists who engage in unlawful acts of violence to intimidate civilian populations or attempt to influence domestic policy without direction or influence from a foreign act.
Okay. So they're saying these people have opinions, right? They haven't the word violent violence. is not in any of these things. Like there's, um, who engage in unlawful acts of violence to intimidate civilian populations. Okay. So there's one mention of violence throughout that entire definition. You do not have to be violent.
You do not have to be extremist. You have to hold an ideology that they don't like, which may be constitutionally protected to fall into one of these two categories. Now it also defines, it also defines conspiracy theorist. Or a conspiracy theory. So Homeland Security defines a conspiracy theory, which is defined as a subset of narratives in which the ultimate cause of an event is believed to be due to a malevolent plot by multiple actors working together or as an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the event.
To the mechanizations of powerful people who attempt to conceal their role, or at least until their aims are accomplished as per the national counterterrorism innovation technology and education center, a DHS center of excellence. DHS does not hold a position on the veracity of the claims associated with these theories.
So what they're saying is if you believe. There's any number of group of people who is trying to conceal their identity that has worked together to cause an event that is a conspiracy theory. And we can write you off and we can put you into a document where we can now put you on a list.
Crazy. This is their definition of a conspiracy theory. So if you hold the belief that any number of people, three, four, five powerful people did anything to cause an event and then tried to conceal their position during that event, which has happened multiple Always, forever, in history, in every event, then you are now considered a citizen.
A conspiracy theorist. And now that becomes important, right? This isn't just conspiracy theory in your bio, right? Uh, this is important because then they can utilize this document and say, here's how we're going to weaponize the department of justice against you. So now that we have that background, let's go back up to the document.
All right. So. Terrorism. So it says that foreign, so there's some foreign stuff or some domestic stuff. I'm just going to walk you through line by line in the document. Um, some of the foreign stuff, it says foreign terrorist organization inspired homegrown violent extremists. So inspired by terrorists, but homegrown will remain high, right?
So homegrown violent extremists. The threat will continue to be characterized primarily by lone offenders or small cells motivated to violence by a combination of racial, religious, gender, or anti government grievances, conspiracy theorists, and personalized factors. We are particularly concerned about the likelihood of violent motivation by developing domestic and global events, including the 2024 election cycle and the ongoing Israel Hamas conflict.
So what you have to notice there is when they say conspiracy theorists. And then they say the election cycle, right? If you say anything about the election, not being fair. not being right, not being accurate, you can now be a labeled a homegrown violent extremist, because that can be tied to some bigger plot, even if you have no violent actions, because what you have to understand about the document and why this document is important is because what they're essentially establishing is the ground rules for their organization, the ground rules for if you say this, right, if you say this thing,
if you say this, We think you're going to this. So we're going to do this, right? If you do, if you think they're say this, we think that you're going to do this. And so we can do all of this to stop you, even though you didn't do any of it yet, preemptively or reasonable belief, right? Words are important.
So when you understand that they're, they can use any, anything within their power, if they can Label you as this DVE or HVE, the Domestic Violent Extremist, or Homegrown Violent Extremist. The second that you say anything about one of these things, right? Global events, like the election cycle, right?
Talking about things like conspiracy theorists, where people plot to do bad things, like they always have.
gender ideology, racial, political, right? I like how they include gender in there. Like, oh, okay, let's use the Department of Justice and lethal force to protect the trans people because their sexual kinks want them to dress up.
All right. Moving on, a number of violent extremists embrace multiple, sometimes competing motivations, challenging our ability to identify their political, their potential targets in advance because their pre attack statements online are often unrelated or only loosely related to the targets they ultimately choose.
So what they're saying there is If you're say anything about anything that we don't like, we can then correlate it back to this entire list of things and say that, oh, because you say you don't agree with women in men's sports, you're now going to enact in a terrorist attack on Jewish populations, right?
So if this, then this, so we can this. Right? If you say something about gender ideology, we believe that you fall into this potential category to do some Jewish violent, or attack on, violent attack on Jewish groups. So we can then do all of this in between to surveil you. It says, Between September 23 and September 24, or July 2024, DVEs driven by anti government, racial, or gender related motivations have conducted at least four attacks in the homeland, one of which resulted in a death.
Like, do you know how much government overreach we're getting for one death here? Between September and July one death, and they're going to weaponize. The Department of Defense, U. S. law enforcement at least disrupted seven additional DVE plots, two HVE plots, and again, I'm not saying that this stuff doesn't happen, I'm not saying that they shouldn't exist, I'm not saying that they shouldn't be able to maybe not even surveil people domestically, right, that wasn't what was supposed to be allowed until the Patriot Act, I'm not saying that they shouldn't be able to do their job though, and their job is to figure out where is a terrorist attack going to come from, and there has been domestic terrorist attacks.
I'm Most of the domestic terrorist attacks have been against Donald Trump. not against literally any other government official. So unless they're speaking about, Oh, if you know, I highly doubt they're using this to surveil liberals with blue hair at, you know, some furry event. No, it's, it's being weaponized against the right.
But again, they have to be able to do their job. I'm sure there are, you know, there's been like the Boston bombing and there's been other historical events that I would love for these people to stop and and nothing against these people if they're surveilling me right now for talking about furries, but like I know you got to do your job.
I know people who have been in positions in these organizations, and I appreciate what you do, but when it's weaponized against the American people for nothing other than posing a political posting a political opinion online. So that you can utilize these overreaching government tools to then surveil their private life that is not constitutional, right?
The Patriot Act is not constitutional. And now this type of document allows you to overreach beyond what should be allowed for, for a complete Orwellian government. State of government. So if you say anything about this category of things, a list of probably 100 words that they have in the Department of Defense and Homeland Security, if you say any word like this, it triggers AI to pick up your profile.
And now they have you on a list somewhere. And now they can use the Patriot Act to listen into your phone microphone and use AI to scrape your conversations and search your conversations for any of the jokes that you make with your wife in private. It shouldn't be a lot, right? You should still be able to do your job.
And I think you can still do your job by monitoring it. with a sniper rifle and not an RPG, right? Or a nuke, essentially, right? You don't need to monitor millions and millions and millions of Americans to find the one that's sitting there posting online talking about how they want to enact some violent act on a school or shoot up some mosque, right?
Like, You don't need all of that. You don't need that power to do that. Now, let's look at some other portions here.
As we move down this document. The next portion I'd like to point out is biological. So this is just interesting to me over the last year foreign and domestic extremists online expressed interest in using DNA modification. So okay, so so I've heard this one several times recently, this is a very recent event.
And this is something that I've talked about before, when you've used 23 and me, you are giving your DNA to a entity that will then sell that data to foreign and domestic.
Governments or companies like BlackRock, right? Now what they can do with that DNA, the technology has been devised. Iran has tried this. China has tried this. There's evidence there. There's been, uh, I was listening to a Senator yesterday talk about on the Sean Ryan podcast, how China has been trying to develop a biological weapon that only attacks childbearing age individuals.
So here's another example of that in this document where it says, We expect threat actors to continue to explore emerging and advanced technologies to aid their efforts in developing and carrying out chemical and biological attacks. Over the last year, this document says, Foreign and domestic extremists online expressed interest in using DNA modification to develop biological weapons to target specific individuals.
So if you want women between the age of this and this, if you want certain ethnic minorities, if you want certain or majorities, you want a certain gender, you want a certain age group, you want a certain background, whatever it is, you can splice DNA down and see, Hey, I want this new COVID quote unquote, but much more deadly to attack men who are fighting age between the ages of 18 and 45 decimate the men between 15 to 45.
They can do that. And that's what this document is outlining here. So when you're giving your DNA to these organizations, they can even target it down to the individual, right? They could release some massive flu virus, and they want to target 15 DNA strands and have it be lethal against, A hundred people, 150 people, they can manipulate that virus to do that.
It also says, we also remain concerned about the potential for threat actors to use unmanned aircraft systems in chemical and biological attacks due to the continued advancement of UAS technology and the growing availability of UAS. So saying that people are going to use drones to drop these types of things.
All right, now it moves into influence operations and transnational repression. All right, so Russia will likely continue to use traditional state sponsored media. For example, over the past year, Russian influence actors have amplified stories regarding U. S. migration flows to stoke discord in the United States.
Like no, that wasn't Russia, that was you. Like maybe this should be talking about how the Harris and Biden campaign let in 22 million illegals. Maybe we should be talking about that being the reason that these stories are amplified, not Russia. We should be having that conversation. You shouldn't be mad at the messenger, right?
Even if they're amplifying those conversations, be like, Hey, look at how ridiculous the United States is for letting in all of these terrorists. We're not going to do that.
It's just funny that to me that they want to point out these foreign countries acting like, Oh, we didn't do anything wrong. It's because they, they said it. They're mad. They're just trying to make you mad at us. It's like playing the, the, you know, your parents are divorced, right? Your parents are divorced.
And one parent's like, Hey, you know, like mom, mom won't let me, you know, I don't know where I'm going with that, but you see the point you get the idea. It's not Russia's fault that you let in 22 million illegals. It's your fault, and they just pointed it out, so maybe, just don't do that. This is over the last year, Iranian information operations have focused on weakening U.
S. public support of Israel and Israel's response to Iranian information operations have focused on weakening U. S. public support of Israel and Israel's response to October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks. These efforts have included leveraging ongoing protests regarding the conflict, posing as online protests.
And encouraging protests prior to the 2020 U. S. presidential election, Iran attempted to amplify divisive narratives to incite violence, influence the U. S. electorate and degrade trust in electoral processes. And like, yeah, for sure. They're probably doing that. And so is Israel, right? Go check out AIPAC.
Maybe we should be talking about AIPAC in here and their influence on, on domestic senators and congressmen and. Presidents, dare I say. Uh, another one that I found to be interesting here was that they talk about the People's Republic of China and their disinformation campaigns. Hmm. And it says that they seek to exploit U.
S. disasters. So the U. S. Homeland Security is saying that China's the reason China is exploiting U. S. disasters just as it did when it blamed Hawaii wildfires on U. S. military activity and may also reduce trust in the U. S. institutions and officials and dissuade survivors to pursue legal recovery or federal recovery response and support.
Yeah. I don't think that it was just China. China. Pointing out that direct energy weapons are real and could have been the result of, or could have resulted in Lahaina. I don't think it's just China pointing out that we have weather modification, that there's literal patents on Google that you can search on all of this technology.
Like, again, stop trying to blame the foreign entity for something that isn't real. is very real and a possibility. It also says the Department of Justice indicted seven Chinese based Chinese nationals for their involvement in a PRC backed criminal hacking group targeting U. S. based critics, businesses, and political officials in malicious cyber operations intended to intimidate and silence dissidents and steal from their businesses.
All right, uh, moving on. Okay, so this is probably the most interesting part of this here. And this talks about threat is likely to focus on the election cycle, right? This is all about the election.
Now, some of the most interesting parts of this, I'll read through for you that I highlighted. Again, if you want this document, as I highlighted it and all of my annotations, you can just head over to my Instagram. Once this is posted, you'll be able to request it from my comment section. All right. So one of the first things here is that, uh, let's just read it from the top so we can get into this better.
Part of the paragraph, our electoral processes are an attractive target for threat actors, and we expect many will seek to influence the 2024 election cycle. While some others may seek to access or interfere with election systems, while law enforcement is still investigating their motives behind the apparent assassination attempts on a former US president.
These incidents highlight the magnitude of the threat surrounding the election cycle. Now, here we go. Some Domestic violence, some domestic violent extremists, particularly those voted motivated by anti government or partisan issues will likely view a wide range of targets indirectly and directly associated with elections as viable targets for violence with the intent of instilling fear among voters, candidates, and election workers.
What would be the means to that? Like what would be the end there? Why would they do that? Why, if you're an anti government or if you're motivated by partisan issues. Well, that's the more important one, right? Anti government or partisan issues, right? If you're anti government, we can now say that, Oh, you're probably going to attack polling areas, right?
You're probably going to go to the local polling area and, and bomb them or whatever, right? You're probably going to do that if you're anti government. Like, no. No, I think you're just bad at your job, in that federalism is generally not helpful, and all it's done is caused a bloated taxation system and leached from American citizens and given all of our money to foreign entities to fight wars that we shouldn't be in.
That's why I'm anti government, and I'm not going to attack anybody as a result. But just because I state that opinion, they can now put me on a list to then say that, oh, I'm going to go attack a polling area. Like, so stupid. Uh, some DVEs, particularly those motivated by anti government or partisan issues, will likely view a wide, okay, we just said that, um, instilling fear among voters, candidates, and election workers, as well as disrupting election processes leading up to or after the November election.
So leading up to, And after like, we're not putting any end to this, right? There's no cycle here. We're like, maybe for the next three to four months, we should be highly focusing on people who say that the government's bad at their job, or doesn't have the right motivations. Nope, door after foreign state affiliated cyber to actors and cyber criminals, almost certainly.
So this is this one I found really interesting too, because they point out the fact that people are going to try to, like state affiliated cyber actors and cyber criminals, and they're are most likely going to try to change votes using technology, hack into the voting systems, and change votes. But then they say something which I find to be hilarious here too.
So foreign state affiliated cyber actors and cyber criminals almost certainly will view network infrastructure that supports US elections as attractive targets. However, there was no reporting to suggest that foreign adversary targets of such systems have ever prevented any eligible voter from casting a ballot.
Compromise the integrity of any ballots, cast or disrupted the ability to tabulate votes or transmit election results in a timely manner, right? So they're definitely going to target. These polling stations. They're definitely going to try to hack in and change votes, but there's no evidence ever that that's ever occurred ever to anyone ever.
We promise, right? So what they're stating there is like, again, laying the groundwork. They're saying that almost certainly, almost certainly will target the network infrastructure that supports elections to try and change votes, but then they follow that up with There was no reporting, however, to suggest that foreign adversary targeting of such systems has ever prevented any eligible voter ever from casting a ballot, or compromise the integrity of the, because if they say, this has happened, we know what's happened, they've changed votes, we know they've changed votes, then what?
Right? Like, then what? Then we know the election system is compromised, and they can't say that, but what they can say is that we know for certain They're going to target this and try to hack into it and try to change votes. But there's no evidence ever that it's ever happened ever, right? But almost certainly they're going to try to do it.
Found that one to be interesting. All right, moving on. It says, in particular, anti government, anti authority DVEs, many of whom likely will be inspired by partisan policy grievances or conspiracy theories will pose the most significant threat. So this is under the guise. So it says we expect the DVEs to post the most significant threat to government officials, voters, elections related personnel and infrastructure, including polling places.
So ballot dropbox locations, voter registration sites, campaign events, political party offices, and vote counting sites in particular anti government. Like if you're anti government, you're not trying to stop people from voting. You're not trying to blow up a, a dropbox for voted, you know, like for votes.
You're not. You're just not participating. I'm not playing this game. The game's stupid. It's, it's all rigged, right? But again, they have to throw that in there. So if you believe that people conspire, right, conspiracy theories, or you believe that the government's not good at what they do, and this may be too large, Any one of those things, you pose the most significant threat.
We have also recently observed a rise in disruptive tactics, targeting election officials, like those observed in past election cycles, including hoax, bomb threats, swatting, doxing, and mailing white powder letters, intended to instill fear. Like I'm not saying that doesn't happen. I'm sure that does happen.
I'm sure there's some pieces of shit that will try to, I don't know, intimidate voters not to vote, whatever. But the fact that they're calling out anybody who believes that a small or large group will conspire and conceal their identity. To do something that you wouldn't want them to do as the American public.
Now you're a conspiracy theorist. And if you believe the government is bad at what they do. If you've heard my bowling alley story when I was in the military, they are generally bad at what they do. Uh, you know, and I've heard this too, do you know who's not bad at what they do? The intelligence agencies.
They're the ones who hire the Harvard graduates and Oxford alumni and MIT this and all those are, they come off as very stupid when they put out those secret service agents that looked like they did when Trump was there. But that was on purpose. Right, the people that are actually in the Department of Defense, at the highest levels of these three letter agencies, they're not unintelligent.
They're not ignorant. They're not stupid. Right? But, most of the government is. Right. It's not all the DMV, but a lot of it's the DMV, uh, online users and forms frequently frequented by some DVS have increasingly called for violence linked to the 2024 election cycle and seek to promote violence in response to politically and socially disruptive topics like immigration, abortion rights, and LGBTQIA issues or significant current events.
Let's talk about that one.
-
In this explosive episode of the Adams Archive, Austin Adams dives deep into some of the most controversial topics making headlines today. We uncover how an Afghan man involved in an Election Day terror plot entered the U.S. with a special visa under the Biden-Harris administration. Next, we analyze President Trump’s strategic appearances on major podcasts, including Andrew Schultz’s, and compare them to Kamala Harris’s disastrous media choices. We also discuss Reddit’s suspicious banning of a forum dedicated to uncovering corrupt individuals and shocking revelations from a Kansas professor advocating violence against Trump supporters. Finally, we dissect Kamala Harris’s bizarre behavior regarding her earring controversy and delve into Hurricane Milton’s aftermath and Biden’s controversial comments on weather control.
Don’t miss out—hit subscribe, like, and share!
1- For direct Access to all our content and platforms,
visit - https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
2- Substack: https://austinadams.subatack.com
3- E- commerce- https://roninbasics.com
Welcome to The Adams Archive, where we dive deep into the stories beneath the headlines and uncover the truths that mainstream media won't touch. Hosted by Austin Adams, this podcast explores hidden narratives, controversial topics, and the intricate web of politics, culture, and society. Join us as we peel back the layers to reveal what's really happening in the world today.
First, we uncover how the same man arrested in an Election Day terror plot was granted a special visa under the Biden-Harris administration. We'll examine the implications of this startling revelation and what it means for national security and immigration policies.
Building on the theme of political intrigue, we explore President Trump's groundbreaking appearance on Andrew Schulz's podcast. We'll discuss how Trump's foray into alternative media signifies a shift in political communication and why it's resonating with the public, especially compared to Kamala Harris's controversial podcast appearances.
Continuing our examination of censorship and information control, we delve into Reddit's recent ban of a forum dedicated to sharing information about Thomas Crooks, the would-be Trump assassin. We'll question why open discussions are being stifled and what this means for free speech in the digital age.
In the realm of academic freedom and societal division, we analyze a shocking incident involving a University of Kansas professor caught advocating for violence against Trump supporters. We'll discuss the repercussions of such rhetoric in educational institutions and its impact on the growing political divide.
Shifting focus to transparency in politics, we scrutinize a revealing clip of Vice President Kamala Harris during a live interview, fueling speculation about her being fed information through a hidden earpiece. We'll connect the dots on how this ties into broader concerns about authenticity and trust in our leaders.
Finally, we turn to natural disasters and government response, examining the aftermath of Hurricane Milton that struck Florida. We'll assess the devastation and critique the administration's handling of the crisis. Additionally, we'll delve into President Biden's controversial comments about controlling the weather, opening up a conversation about conspiracy theories and the plausibility of weather manipulation.
Don't miss out on these eye-opening discussions that challenge the status quo. Subscribe to The Adams Archive now to stay informed and engaged. Follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media for exclusive content, updates, and more. Your support means the world to us, and together we can seek the truth and make a difference.
All the Links
For easy access to all our content and platforms, visit: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
----more----
Full Transcription
Adams archive.
Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adams archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we are going to be discussing how the same man who was just arrested in the election day terror plot, Was actually given a visa, a special visa under the Biden and Harris administration.
Then we will be moving on to our next subject, which is that president Trump just went on to Andrew Schultz's podcast and he continues to go on these podcasts, which I think is probably the best move we saw Kamala do this in like the worst way ever when she went on the call her daddy podcast, which is a female centric sex podcast, and now Trump just continuing to go on.
Um, the largest shows in the country without making himself look like a fool. So we'll look at some of those clips and what they discussed. Then we'll move on to Reddit banning the forum dedicated to sharing information about Thomas Crooks. Now, why would they want to do that? I wonder. We'll talk about that too.
Uh, then we had the university of Kansas professor that was, uh, discussing in front of his class on a recorded call, talking about Trump supporters and how they should be lined up and shot. And there is some breaking news about his position at that university that we will discuss as well. Then we'll move on to a clip that just came out of the.
President, vice president, presidential candidate, Harris, who is in a live interview, and there's been all this speculation about the earrings that she wore during the debate. She's been wearing them literally every interview since, and she's on a zoom call and she says something that alludes to. What everybody's thinking and believes, which is that somebody is feeding her all this information.
Then the last conversation we will have is around Hurricane Milton that just struck Florida last night. Now we'll look at some of the devastation, some of the conversations surrounding it. Wasn't as big as we thought, doesn't look like it, but I'm sure there is still some terrible terrible destruction in its wake.
So we'll look at that. And then we'll also discuss the response from the current president, as well as the VP. And the last clip will be around Biden discussing them controlling the weather. Are you a conspiracy theorist? Probably if you listen to the show. All right, all of that more, but first go ahead and hit the subscribe button, leave a five star review.
That is the only way that you can help move this podcast forward. And help get the word out. So tell your friends, tell your family, leave a five star review, hit the subscribe button, head over to YouTube. You can watch all the clips that we're looking at talking about. You can see my wonderful face as we're talking about them and head over to Ronan basics.
com. You've heard about me talk about this for a few months now. However, we just. Now are getting in one of our main products, which is the Faraday phone sleeve. So you can head there right now. You can purchase one. It will be shipped to you the same day. All right, head over there. Check out our products, the EMF blocking Faraday hat, the RFID blocking wallets, and the Faraday phone sleeve.
Can't forget about the beanies as well. So head over there. Ronan basics. com and without further ado, let's jump into it. Alright,
the very first topic that we're going to discuss today is that there was a immigrant who was arrested, arrested in an election day terror attack. So allegedly him and another individual were going to go to the elections. Uh, and Cause mass, mass, mass. Terror by killing as many people as possible becoming martyrs.
But let's go ahead and read this article comes from the post millennial says the Afghan man arrested Tuesday by the FBI for allegedly convinced by allegedly concocting an election day terror plot was allowed to enter the United States of America as a special immigrant in September of 2021. Nasir Ahmad Tahiti, 27 entered The US with a special visa during the Biden Harris administration's chaotic and botched American withdrawal.
Now, one thing that I have to question is how concerned should we be about this happening by somebody else? Now, if there's one plot, there's probably two plots. There's all of these immigrants that are here that are here for a reason, right? Maybe some of them are here to, to improve their family's situation and outcome.
Maybe some of them are here to, I don't know, move drugs. and human trafficking. Maybe some of them are here to escape a gang ridden country that they come from, which is great. Do it legally, right? Do it legally should absolutely be able to immigrate here just like almost every one of our ancestors did.
However, the amount that have come over the border in the last four years alone is saying is the same amount of people as One to two states combined 10 million. The number has been thrown down 16 to 20 million now immigrants in our country. And when you understand that the total population is roughly 330 million, that starts to become a big issue, right?
Especially when we talk about housing. We talk about jobs, we talk about inflation, homeless crisis, uh, you name it, this will exacerbate the issue. Now one issue that we can kind of foresee as a result of this is the amount of terrorists and gang affiliated members. We saw this with all the Venezuelan gangs, we saw this now with this Islamic state group, ISIS, right?
So they've been sending people here and they are going to attempt these things. Yeah. This year, Ahmad Tawheedi entered the U. S. with a special visa during the Biden Harris administration, during the botched American withdrawal from Afghanistan that says that saw 13 U. S. personnel killed and billions of dollars in military hardware left to the Taliban.
The FBI has charged Tawhidi with conspiring and attempting to provide material support to the Islamic State group. He allegedly confessed to the FBI that he and a juvenile co conspirator were planning an election day terrorist attack on large crowds, and both were anticipating Islamic martyr deaths.
Tawhidi had reportedly wrapped up his affairs, liquidated his assets, and bought a one way ticket for his wife and child to fly back to Afghanistan. Tawhidi could be sentenced to 35 years in prison. Uh, Let's see what else here it says on October 7th FBI assets allegedly caught Tahiti and the juvenile at a rural location in Western District, Oklahoma, where they had purchased, received, and took possession of two AK 47s, 10 magazines, and 500 rounds of ammunition.
The Department of Justice news released explained upon receiving the rifles and ammunition. Tahiti and the juveniles were arrested. I wonder how they like, what kind of went into that, but this is just the beginning guys. This is just the beginning. The men who were going to attack American citizens on the election day that were caught by the FBI were immigrants allowed here under Biden and Harris.
And this is the one of many attacks that we can assume that we're going to see. One of many, because what are these people here for? How many other terrorists, how many terrorists, other affiliated people are here? How many of these attacks are already planned? And who's responsible for this? Well, I think we own the answer to that.
And it's the, the, the organizers of this mass illegal migration, the ones who are paying people, busing them in, sending them to states. We, we do not understand, like I, there was a good quote that I saw the other day, it said something about, it said something about the people who run our country, the people, the people who run the world are either naive and stupid.
Or I got to look at the quote, but there's a great quote around it. And the idea is that they're maliciously doing this or they're that dumb, right? Do they want people to be having massive terrorist attacks? I would hope not. What I, what the issue is, is very likely. And I think everybody agrees on this at this point is the reason that there's this mass migration is they want to flood the States, the battleground States with immigrants.
Go look at where these people have gone and settled the number one States. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Illinois, right? All of the states that they want to flood with new citizens and not, and maybe they're not even thinking about this generation. Maybe, maybe they aren't even thinking about, Oh, how am I going to get this generation to vote for me?
No, it's two generations from now, four election cycles. They're thinking ahead because if they get an immigrant husband and a wife here, and they have a child here, Regardless of the situation, that child gets immigrant status. That child gets granted a green card. That child is now a American citizen doesn't even need a green card.
Now what now that child generally like 70 percent of people, 80 percent of people stay in the state that they were born in, especially if they're low income. Now, what let's see four election cycles, five election cycles later, that person's 20. And they're voting Democrat. So they look at these numbers and they say, okay, if we get 10 million people here, we send 2 million to Michigan.
We send 2 million to Pennsylvania of those, that million that settles. I think it was 770, 000 in Michigan. Of that 770, 000, there's 350, 000 couples who are going to have an average of two kids, which is another 770, 000 people. And in five election cycles, the same state that we lost by a margin of 20, 000 votes now has 700, 000 more people in poverty who are 80 percent likely to vote Democrat.
So they're not playing checkers here and they, maybe they are, maybe they are that stupid to think that if they flood these illegal immigrants here and maybe they're not that stupid to think that they can get them to vote without voter ID, which we know happens. But even so, the biggest problem is going to be that our country is going to be taken over, taken over by people who do not share the same values as us, who did not grow up in a democratic society, adhere to Sharia law, who are stopping women from going to school.
They can't drive cars, they can't show their face, Right? It's unbelievable. And this is just the beginning. This is just the beginning of these terrorist attacks. This is just the beginning of the gang issues that we're going to see with these Venezuelan gangs, MS 13, cartels, because of the border. Moving on.
Trump went on to Andrew Scholl's podcast, Flagrant, and I think this is brilliant. I think he should have been doing this all along. Podcasts are the news of today. There's far more people that listen to a podcast than that listen to the news. Makes sense, right? People trust podcasts, like 80 percent of the 80 percent of people pulled, trust a podcast compared to like 16 percent of people that were pulled, trusted traditional news media.
So if that's where people are and that's where people's trust are, then maybe you should go to the people that are genuine and have those conversations there. And that's what Trump's done. And this says president Trump Schultz podcast was widely celebrated on social media with supporters of the 2020 24 GOP nominee during Trump as the funniest president in American history.
Uh, the unfiltered interview released on Wednesday and published to Axe, formerly Twitter, covered a range of topics. Uh, let's watch some of the clips. Don't really care about their opinion on it. Let's see. And, here we go.
Elon interviewed me on something. And I think they said 275 million hits. That's a lot of people. That was a wreck. That's a nation. Yeah. But it's a whole new different way of, uh, Can I ask you a question? Getting the word out, right? About Elon specifically. Is he your favorite African American? You know, he's a great guy with, I mean, he's obviously a brilliant guy.
Yeah. I mean, when I saw the rocket engines come back, I said, what is that? Like a couple of years ago, you know, I've seen rockets go up and then they crash into the water and I see the, the engines are coming back and they're landing, they're landing and they land on a raft in the middle of the ocean someplace with a little dot and they land right on the top of the spot.
Alright, one thing to say. Imagine getting interviewed by President Trump and crossing your legs like that in front of him. How dare you, Andrew Schulz? How dare you? Wearing high Wearing half White socks halfway up your shin and crossing your legs. Like you are running in a marathon in New York. The little dot and they land right on the top of the spot.
And my wife can't parallel park. Most people can't. But no, he's great. But he's got a great heart. He was with me, as you know, on the other night. Yeah. And we were honoring a man who got killed at a rally. Corey, firefighter, great guy. And it was a beautiful evening. But Lee, Elon went out. Yeah. And he loved the crowd.
He loves the country. And he's picked a side. A lot of people don't want to pick a side. I have a lot of people that are Big supporters of me. Yeah, but they they won't go all out. You know, they they can't Yeah, there's a car. Yeah There is of course, but there's also a liability I mean, you know some people I respected a lot when this guy was up there doing jumping jacks You gotta vote for Trump.
You gotta Yeah. He was jumping high. He looked quite African. He's in good shape. I look, I'm looking at his waist, I'm saying, wait a minute, does he work out or something? But he's, he is, he really, and he had a, he had a great time. This is quite a dangerous interview for Trump, by the way. Like, Andrew Scholes is not, uh, not, not setting him up for failure here with a few of the jokes that he's already made trying to see if Trump will bite.
But, uh, do him all so far. And, you know, he's, he's not out that much. He's probably, maybe a little, would you say he's a little reclusive, possibly? He's also busy. He's got like five different companies. He's very busy and maybe a little reclusive. Yeah. He had the greatest time. He was saying, look at these people.
We had a hundred thousand, more than a hundred thousand. It was a record. It was nobody's ever said, and it was, it was a celebration of a life. And it was really a mega, it was a mega deal. He was a big mega person. His family was there and two other people that were very badly hurt were also celebrated.
They were very badly hurt. They weren't actually expected to live. Yeah. And they live, and, uh, they had incredible doctors. Some of those country doctors are better than the big doctors that we spend a lot of money on, and they don't do as good. I will tell you right now. I don't want to knock anybody, but those country doctors saved two people, because I was told that three would Country doctors?
No, think of that. Three would be in trouble, and three were gonna, now, quarry immediately, but the other two were so bad that they thought they wouldn't make it. Yeah. Yeah. And, uh, those country doctors, they pulled them, they pulled them together. They did a great job. All right. So there's one, let's take a look at another one.
Uh, here we go. There is a question, but there's also a liability. I mean, you know, some people I respected a lot when this guy was up there doing jumping jacks, you got to vote. Also what we just watched and here's about Biden. Over the last week, I have to, well, we talk about funny or sad. I think it's more sad than funny.
Yeah. He has one ability I don't have. Yeah. He sleeps. He can sleep. This guy goes on a beat, and he lays down on one of those, you know, six ounce, they weigh six ounces and he can't lift it. They're meant, they're meant for, they're meant for children, young people, and old people to lift. They're aluminum, you know, hollowed aluminum.
They weigh very little. And he can't lift, and somebody convinced him he looks great in a bathing suit. And when you're 82, typically bathing suits aren't gonna make you look great. Right, right. You're not gonna be enhanced. Yeah. Alright? It's just one of those things. I can't be sure about that, but typically you don't Depends what he's packing.
I don't know what the hell he's packing, but it's I don't wanna know. And I don't wanna know either. I don't know. But, but He has an ability to fall asleep while on camera. He can lie down on one of those things, and in minutes, he's stone cold out. And he's got cameras, because he's the president, so they have cameras on him.
And then they show him sleeping on the beach. You'll never see me sleeping in front of a camera.
Oh, and last one here. Let's go ahead and see which one. Let's watch this right here. Get up. How much did China buy today? Sir, they bought. I'd call him up and say you're behind. You have to buy 50 billion. Do you think Biden does that? Biden's sleeping. But I, over the last week, I have, what we talk about, funny or sad.
I think it's more sad than funny. He has one ability I don't have. Yeah. Yeah, so that's the last thing. Alright, so, He's holding his own, right? He's on a comedy podcast and seems to be getting the comedians to laugh. Now, one thing I think he talks about there, which is true. We see a lot of the battles between Trump and Biden died down now, which a lot of people have talked about this.
If that man was your grandpa, you would just be pissed that they're putting him in this position. You would be mad that they're, they're putzing this old man around and pretending like he's actually doing a job that he's not doing. And it's honestly pathetic that our country is doing that to him in the deep state, which is, we all know why we've talked about it before.
He's a puppet. He can be controlled at a whim. Um, there's too much, too much dirt. There's too many, you know, too, too many, uh, pieces of blackmail out there on him that have been discussed, but, uh, you know, we all know the reason why. Same reason they have Kamala there. They can control them. And so moving on.
Reddit bans forum dedicated to sharing information about would be Trump assassin Thomas Crooks. So Thomas Crooks, the assassin of Donald Trump had a Reddit forum named after him where people were sharing all of this information, all of this information about the attempt of assassination, uh, trying to figure out who was he, was this the person that they're saying he is, was it somebody else trying to figure out this conspiracy and Reddit took it down.
Why would they do that? Why would they do that? People sharing information about a presidential assassination. So it says a forum dedicated to sharing information about would be assassin Thomas Crooks has been banned from Reddit. Crooks was killed by snipers after launching an assassin, but yeah, we know.
It violated rules against posting violent content, they say. And that archive of the subreddit shows it was a popular forum that generated high level engagement. And the posts issued on the forum vary, but all pertain to seeking answers and sharing information about the historical assassination attempt.
Questions about Crook's security failures that day and whether the attempt was an inside job were discussed in the section before the ban. Reddit did not provide any example of the violent content shared that went against the company's policies. Reddit is the latest news website to block information from being shared.
Now, we remember with the last one, During this one, we remember Fox News live censoring the discussion in a congressional hearing, which I didn't know was even allowed, right? They're calling it a live feed of a public official's discussion in our government. I guess they're a private company and they can do whatever they want.
But actively, during the live feed, cutting the feed when a question was asked about the multiple shooters theory. And I'm sure these people were getting somewhere. That's what we're seeing in today's modern society where they cannot, we see it with the hurricane. We see it with every one of these things.
They cannot, they can no longer control the narrative. The narrative has gotten out of control. I, I heard a, a comparison during a podcast recently where they talked about how the church loved the printing press, originally loved the printing press, and because they could print all these bibles and get the word out about what the, and, and frame the discussions in the way that they wanted to, but then.
Then other people were using that to spread information about the church's corruption. And they didn't seem to like it anymore. Right? They, they, they called for people to stop using it. And that's what we're seeing with social media, right? They, they created these social platforms to control us with narratives.
They created these social platforms so that they could push out propaganda. And now they've lost control of it. We are, we are winning the information war where the minute a hurricane comes out and we see the response from, from our government, we're able to see right through it, look up the patents and see that this could not, this could be potentially not as natural as we thought it was.
The government is now scrambling, scrambling, setting up intermediary, uh, discussion forums with social media platforms, trying to censor every conversation that, that poses a threat to their narrative, scrambling, because they created something that they no longer control. And people are seeing through all of their propaganda now.
We can no longer be influenced the way that we were just 15 years ago. And so it says Google scrubbed the assassination attempt from its auto complete search engine. Facebook warned against sharing photos of President Trump raising his fist in the air after the rally, falsely alleging that they were AI generated.
In following accusations of election interference by the Trump campaign and Republican lawmakers, both big tech corporations have since fixed their faults. But they're all doing it. They're doing it still. And they're doing it subtly. They're not doing it the same way that they were with mass censorship campaigns the way that they were during COVID because there's not as much profitability in this.
And if they lose, they're going to be in trouble. We've talked about how Trump needs to just come out and say, Hey, whoever is lying, whoever is lying in these news media organizations, I'm going to come after you.
And if that was on the other side, maybe that's a concern, right? Maybe you say, and maybe it should be a concern from our side. Maybe he shouldn't go after them. But It's absolutely election interference. If you're putting yourself in a position where you are influencing the election, putting yourself in a position where you are propping up one candidate and you're the single largest purveyor of information in the country and what you're censoring is true, factually true, that can be proven in the court of law.
So pretty crazy. Hopefully they move the forum somewhere else. Well, let's see if anybody has anything to say about this. Doesn't look like it. But I wonder why they would do that. Maybe because they were getting somewhere. As simple as that. Maybe, maybe a single post, a single position, a single picture, a single comparison, a single paragraph could have been the reason that Reddit pulled this down.
Because they don't want to let you know the truth. They do not want you finding it out. Why would they not want that? There's plenty of violent Reddit threads. There's plenty of violence on X. This is the reason that X is so important. And despite the constant barrage of violence on X, I still like to utilize it.
And I'm still trying to grow my platform there. Go check it out. The Austin J Adams on X. But I think that the violence on X is actually a psyop. There's constantly on X people getting killed. There's all these hyper violent videos that are being shared, just pushed right into your face within two seconds, you're going to see somebody, you know, they don't even give you time to scroll or tell you what's about to happen.
And you'll see somebody get like beat up or stabbed or something crazy. And it hasn't been as bad in the last few weeks, but I think that's absolutely a sign up. I absolutely think that there is, uh, these accounts that are hyper violent on acts are being pushed to want to get people off of the platform and to create a narrative around the platform that is negative.
I don't think that those are actually people who, at least the largest of the accounts are actually people who are wanting to just continually push. Super crazy, violent videos. I think that those videos are specifically being pushed onto X so that they can continue their narrative about it being an unsafe place for free speech and a violent platform with antisemitism.
All they have to do is create all these bot accounts that they pay overseas and then push out all the videos to suit the narrative that they want with faceless accounts. None of those videos that are being pushed by people like that ever are from an individual. They're always from Some 18 plus this, whatever this, like they're just paying people to pump out media so that it suits their narrative so they can go after Trump and push it as this crazy unhinged platform.
But we need that platform for situations exactly like this, where people can have discussions, figure things out outside of traditional media without any censorship.
All right, now moving on here, there was a University of Kansas professor who sat in front of a recorded classroom session and said that Trump voters should be lined up And mass murdered. But then he goes, Oh, whoa, whoa, whoa. I think we should cut that one from the recording. Now, this man, let's see, Professor Phil Lowcock.
Not sure that applies here. Professor Phil Lowcock, the director of international student athlete support who works at the university's sport and exercise science department. In this article says a professor of the University of Kansas, let's go ahead and watch the clip first, because let's just give our own context around it here.
But let's go ahead and watch this clip.
Guys are smarter than girls. You got some serious problems. Uh, that's what frustrates me. Let's see not getting any volume here All right, here we go. And here is the clip.
That's what frustrates me. There are going to be some males in our society that will refuse to vote for a potential female president because they don't think females are smart enough to be president. We could line all those guys up and shoot them. They clearly don't understand the way the world works.
Did I say that? Scratch that from the recording. I don't want the deans hearing that I said that. Now his point there was, there's going to be certain men, only men are going to not vote for Kamala Harris, which again is an insult to the intelligence of women. Also, more so than what you're saying about men voting for women, or yeah, men aren't going to vote for women because they think they're dumb.
No, maybe we think Kamala Harris is incompetent. If you throw Tulsi Gabbard up there, I would have been highly interested. I think she should have been the running mate of Trump. I think Kamala is incompetent. I think Kamala is unintelligent. I don't think Kamala is well equipped to take office. But for this man, a professor, the people who are educating your children, you are paying money, a university, this isn't even a community college with some stupid professor.
This man was chosen. He may very well have tenure, right? Maybe not now that we see what the result of this is, but how, how unbelievable. This is something that if you would have looked back and this should be historically looked back on as The same way that we look back on some of the biggest atrocities ever and how they unfolded, right?
This professor in a university is on recording saying Trump supporters should be lined up in shot. That's where we've gotten to. And this is supposed to be the tolerant left, right? This is supposed to be the party of tolerance. And we've seen that they're exactly the opposite of that. Right? Right. We've seen that they, they are the ones who are calling for violence.
They are the ones who are slinging insults. They are the ones who are going in front of our children and claiming that you should shoot people based on their political ideology. That is not what our country is founded on. I love people who are Republicans. I love people who are Democrats. I love people who are libertarians, who are everything in between.
None of none of them should have violence inflicted upon them because of their political leanings. And what you have to understand about people's political leanings is very often than not, and I did a whole episode on this and like the predeterminants of your political voting. There's a lot of factors that go into your, your vote that come from where you come from, the state you were born in, the parents you were born to your socioeconomic status, your, uh, your job, your education level.
There's so many predeterminants of this to just say, Oh, all those people are bad people and they should be murdered. That sounds like something out of Nazi Germany. All that class over there should be lined up and murdered. Mass murder, genocide for political ideology. That's what this professor wants.
Now he has since been put on leave. It says after the video was uploaded on X. Let's see if there's a Uh, after the video was uploaded on Axe formerly Twitter, there was a fury with calls for Professor Lowcock to be fired and resigned. Some users even wanted to see criminal charges be filed. I mean, it's literal incitement of violence.
You're not allowed to say that you should do this to that. Like, yeah, you want to talk about speech that is maybe not imminent violence, but like it's pretty damn close. Maybe you shouldn't go to jail for it, but you should definitely be fired. And you shouldn't be representing a school and educating children.
Okay. He needs to be fired immediately. It was bad enough. He said it, but then he tried to cover it up. One user said, let's see what else we got here. Somebody else says, what the hell is wrong with people? He should not be allowed to teach and should be investigated. This is one of the many reasons why colleges have become a scam and the money grab.
Yep. Uh, the university of Kansas released a statement after the backlash and announced that the professor administratively. Let's go ahead and read their statement here. It says a statement from the university regarding a classroom video. Here is the University of Kansas's response. And they said the university is aware of a classroom video in which an instructor made an inappropriate reference to violence.
The instructor is being placed on administrative leave pending further investigation. The instructor offers his sincerest apologies and deeply regrets the situation. So they're probably not going to fire him. His intent was to emphasize his advocacy for women's rights and equality. And he recognizes he did a very poor job of doing so.
The university has an established process for situations like this and will follow that process. Let's go ahead and see. What the actual response to this was because that's a crazy statement to then back him up and saying, Oh, he cares about women's rights. That's why he said you should line up and shoot an entire group of people.
Oh, and they eliminated, eliminated people from making comments. How hilarious. Of course they did because they don't want free speech. So that is wild. That is crazy. And that's what we're paying tens of thousands of dollars for your children to be taught. By people like that. And then for the university to go and defend him.
Oh, we're going to place him on administrative leave. Don't worry about it. But all he was trying to do is defend women's rights. No, all he was trying to do is say an entire half of the country should have a genocide committed against them for their political ideology. Now, speaking of Kamala Harris's competency, there's a clip going around right now where Kamala Harris was on a zoom call.
And on this Zoom call that Kamala Harris was on, she decides to cover her face and talk to somebody, somebody, who could that somebody be, and say, It's a live broadcast. And the microphone picks it up. People have speculated, I being one of them, One thing you'll notice about Kamala Harris is every single interview Kamala Harris has been a part of since the debate, she's wearing those same earrings, the same earrings that everybody is accusing her of having somebody in her ear telling her exactly what to say.
Now we have confirmation of that. In this clip, you will see Kamala Harris speaking to whoever that individual is that's inside of her ear, telling them that it's a live broadcast. Embarrassingly, because she didn't even know that they could pick it up on the microphone, which is hilarious. So let's go ahead and watch this video, and you'll hear her say right at the start of it, It's a live broadcast.
Here we go. Hear that?
We really got to watch those, those areas and those. She covers her mouth like this and goes, it's a live broadcast to whoever she's speaking to. That's in her ear. Who else would she be talking to?
Right? What does she, who, what are they trying to tell her there? As my video goes away, let's go ahead and watch the rest of the clip and see if we can get a little bit more contacts.
It's a live broadcast. Listen for that. Flood. Uh, I watch those, those areas in those communities, so it takes quite a while for that water to drain. Thank you very much. Hey Ken, I have a question for you. You, you mentioned words matter and um, I know there's a lot of, um, media following this, this briefing.
So there have been, um, we've gone from a Cat five to a cat now watch how much she struggles, which that a lot of folks have been using as downgrade. But it sounds like you're cautioning us that that may communicate a sense that the danger is lessened when, in fact, it's not. Can you talk a little bit about that?
Because I know a lot of folks are watching right now and would love to have your feedback on how we should be talking about this. Already, we have sent more than 1, 000 federal personnel to be on the ground in Florida to assist with what needs to happen in the state to prepare for this hurricane. And we will continue to scale up those efforts.
To the people of Florida, and in particular, the people of the Tampa region, we urge you to take this storm seriously. As has been said before, this is a storm that is expected to be of historic proportion. And many of you, I know, are tough, and you've ridden out these hurricanes before. This one's going to be different.
And so we ask you that by every measure understand it's going to be more dangerous, more deadly, and more catastrophic. So please listen to your local Now you can see In this clip, you can see the same earrings, the same earrings, the little pearls with the two gold hoops on or on the side of it, holding it in and they wiggle every time she moves her head.
The same exact hearing, she has not taken these hearings off. And I want to go back and look at all the interviews prior to the debate and see if she ever wore these earrings prior to that, because I don't believe that that was the case. They're talking about they know what they're doing. And if you are told to evacuate, please evacuate immediately.
Wait, Kamala Harris said it might as well do it. And in the hours and days ahead, president Biden and I, and our administration will continue to do everything we can to protect the people who have been in the path of this storm. And once the storm has passed, we will be there to help folks recover and rebuild.
All right. Now discussing the hurricane here, let's go ahead and look at some of the discussions surrounding it and some of the damage. Here's a video from Fox News, and his point is that they've turned this entire hurricane into a PR battle, right? None of the, there's zero genuine concern coming from Kamala or Biden.
All they're worried about is the optics, that's all they've been worried about this entire time, and they've been scrambling to try and look like they've been doing anything at all to help the citizens, or that they actually care. And all they've seen the people talk about is how, um, They see right through it.
Everybody knows that they don't really care. Everybody knows that they're just trying to make it appear as if they're doing enough or giving enough money, or they have the funds to be able to even help. And we all know that that's not true. Here's the clip. Out today and defended his administration's slow response to hurricane Helene, calling any criticism of it, disinformation and pointing fingers at Trump.
There's been reckless and irresponsible and relentless promotion of disinformation and outright lies about what's going on. Former President Trump has led this onslaught of lies. Assertions have been made that property is being confiscated. That's simply not true. They're saying people impacted by these storms will receive 750 in cash and no more.
That is simply not true either. They're saying that money needed for these crises are being diverted to migrants. What the heck are they talking about? Stop it. It's outrageous. It's just not true. Biden's fighting Trump harder than the hurricane. If he should be angry at anybody, he should be angry at his team.
They didn't pre position assets in North Carolina to help in the foothills. Just like Afghanistan and the border, the hurricane's now Trump's fault. Americans have lost power, their homes. Some of them, even their husbands. They're not worried about what politicians say on TV. They are worried because they haven't seen FEMA all week.
Criticizing your government isn't misinformation. It's a God given right of every American. Instead of battling to save lives, the Biden Harris administration is treating natural disasters like a PR battle. They need to be won with words instead of fast action. There have always been issues, uh, in disasters.
Maui, uh, certainly this, this happened where there's misinformation or there's scams, but we've never seen anything like we have at this level. The administration will also continue to work out, to, to work out and call out misinformation. And conspiracy theories around the storm and federal and state responses.
This is wrong, dangerous, and it must stop immediately. Are we concerned about any misinformation or disinformation regarding evacuations that we need to clear up at this point? There's been a lot of misinformation out there, Madam Vice President, that's for sure. The only misinformation we've heard is that Biden's doing a great job.
Oh, and if You just drive your electric car, cat five hurricanes will shrink into cat twos. Americans are naturally suspicious of the government after they lied to us about, oh, I don't know, Vietnam, Iraq, COVID, Russia, the president's health. This isn't a cheap fake. North Carolina sees the aftermath and Biden and Harris were late.
So let's look at one more clip about this and then we'll discuss it, which Biden, they cut it off early in that which they don't want to spread to spread the misinformation and malinformation. Let's go ahead and watch this, which is where Biden mentions the weather manipulation. Here it is. Now the claims are getting even more bizarre.
Congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a congresswoman from Georgia, is now saying the federal government is literally controlling the weather. We're controlling the weather. It's beyond ridiculous. It's got to stop. Moments like this, there are no red or blue states. There's one United States of America where neighbors are helping neighbors.
Volunteers and first responders are risking everything, including their own lives, to help their fellow Americans. State, local, and federal officials are standing side by side. Let me repeat, no one should make the American people question whether their governments will make sure that this is acting on a strike.
They'll be there. What did he just say? No one, let me make this clear. Okay, make it clear. Tell me. No one should make the American people question Make it clear. Let me repeat. No one should make the American people question whether their governments will make sure that this is act around strikes. They'll be there.
We will. Now the claims are getting even more bizarre. No one should be, let me make this clear. Let me repeat this. No one should be Believing their government will be active in Shrana. People question whether their governments will be make this sure that this is active on a strike. We'll be making sure the actor amount of strikes, they'll be there.
We they'll be there. We'll make the sure to act amount of strikes. We'll be there says Biden. Nobody should be concerned about their government. Make the shirt a active amount of strikes. We'll be there. Okay. Thank you so much. So going back to the original point here and the original clip where people are talking about it is he's sitting here trying to say, Oh, we wouldn't, we would never control the weather.
How ridiculous, what a conspiracy theory. Well, when you go back and read the paperwork, when you look at the long list of patents, when you go back and look at the long list of military history, where we did this very thing, when you go watch the Michio Kaku Discussion, I believe it was on CNN, discussing how we manipulated the weather in Vietnam.
How we are actively looking for ways to shrink storms, grow storms, right? Oh, we stopped doing that, somebody said. I saw, I saw somebody post about this. And they said, well, we would never do that. We would never do that because there was dangers. And this was in a Ground. News article that was posted on social media.
And said we would never do that because there was dangers of making them bigger. Yeah, bitch, you made it bigger. That's our claim. That was the whole claim. Yes, absolutely. You can manipulate the weather. Yes, absolutely. There is patents. Yes, absolutely. The FBI, the CIA, the government has in the past manipulated weather for their own purposes.
We saw it in Vietnam. We saw it in China, we saw it in, there's, there's so many examples of this that we saw in our own Gulf Coast in the 1940s. Example after example, and here he is sitting in front of you. You know, it's not, it's, that's all a conspiracy theory. Just like COVID was a conspiracy theory.
Just like, you know, the election interference was a conspiracy theory. Just like the Hunter Biden laptop was a conspiracy theory. Just like the vaccine causing health issues was a conspiracy theory. Just like, Time after time after time after time again, almost every one of these things. And I'm actually really surprised that Biden called this out.
And the reason I'm surprised that he called this out is there's maybe 50 percent of the right that knows this or understands this, or is hearing about this weather manipulation. That leaves a whole other 75 percent of the population who maybe hadn't heard about weather manipulation up until the point that Biden calls out and says, these conspiracy theorists mentioning weather manipulation.
That was the, the worst thing Biden could have done about the weather manipulation was call it out on national television, because now the other 75 percent of people who weren't hearing about it, because you have all these liberals and Democrats in their own echo chambers, not using X, using Instagram, using whatever social media platforms, Tik TOK.
Not hearing about the fact that our own government has been manipulating our weather for decades, almost almost an entire century now, over a century now, since 1916. Now you're going to have people looking into it who weren't looking into it. Just like people found out eventually, even if they were liberal, even if they were Democrats, that the vaccine was not the best choice for the family after you pushed it and pushed it and pushed it and pushed it.
That lockdowns didn't work. That mass didn't work. That Vietnam was under false pretenses. Right? So many examples of these conspiracies that the government said were conspiracies that ended up being true. And now him saying on national television that this is just a conspiracy theory, and these people are crazy, and this congresswoman is wrong, and so are all of you.
Now he's opened that door for so many people who would have never heard about that. And again, it is one of the worst things he could have done, is actually mention that on live television. So, with that, I will leave you, my friends. I hope you have a wonderful day. Thank you so much for listening. Head over to ronanbasics.
com r o n i n b a s i c s dot com. Check out our new website. Just got done redoing it. It is under the final stages of construction, but you can go check it out. See where we're at. Look at some of the products and I appreciate you. I love you. Subscribe, leave a five star review, and I hope you have a wonderful day.
-
Estão a faltar episódios?
-
Welcome to a podcast where we peel back the layers of deception to reveal the truths lurking beneath the surface. Join host Austin Adams as he delves into the most controversial and pressing issues of our time, challenging the mainstream narrative and sparking thought-provoking discussions.
From Engineered Disasters to Global Conflict
In this gripping episode, we explore the dark theory behind hurricane Helene being a directed hurricane to target lithium-rich regions. Is there a hidden agenda to manipulate natural disasters for corporate gain? We investigate the evidence and discuss the implications of such practices on vulnerable communities.
War on the Horizon
As tensions escalate globally, we dissect the recent attack on Israel by Iran, examining its origins and potential consequences. How might these conflicts draw the United States into another protracted war? We analyze the geopolitical landscape and what it means for international relations and security.
A Strike That Could Cripple America
Turning our attention homeward, we delve into the longshoremen's strike that threatens to shut down America's ports. We discuss how this could cripple the U.S. economy, leading to shortages, price hikes, and widespread disruption. What are the demands, and is there a resolution in sight?
Join the ConversationDon't miss out on these critical discussions that mainstream media won't cover. Subscribe now to stay informed and empowered. Follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media for exclusive content, updates, and more.
Thank You for Your Support
We appreciate your commitment to seeking the truth and supporting independent journalism. Your engagement makes all the difference.
All the LinksFor easy access to all our content and platforms, visit: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
----more----
Full Transcription
Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adams archive. My name is Austin Adams and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we are going to be diving deep into some really serious catastrophic situations that have occurred over the past couple of weeks here. The first one being the terrible and horrific Hurricane Helene that has hit several states and just decimated, absolutely decimated the communities there.
It's horrible. It's terrible to see. There's All of these videos of people that are stranded on top of buildings. There's firefighters telling people not to go rescue them because it's too dangerous. It is horrible. On top of that, there's also some speculation and skepticism similar to what there was in Lahaina where people don't believe that this hurricane Was as natural as it appeared not the production of it But the path of it and you might be thinking well, that's crazy We can't move hurricanes and what I would say to that is listen to the full episode because maybe you'll change your mind The second thing that we're going to discuss is going to be will briefly touch on the vice presidential debate.
That was just a Eight hours ago now. We will talk about that, some of the key moments. We won't take too much time on that, but I did wanna just highlight a couple things. And that will be at the end actually, I believe so. Other than that, we will also talk about the seaport strike that is going on, which could heavily affect the United States production and ability to provide food.
to provide gas to provide everything and anything that you purchase comes through one of these seaports. Now, these workers are on strike for several reasons, mostly contract negotiations, but also they are hesitant or frustrated that the opportunity of the organization that they're working for utilizing automation.
I have my own opinions about it. I do see their point, but we'll talk about it. And we'll also talk about what this could possibly do to you and your family and maybe what you can do to get prepared. Then we will talk about Iran striking Israel in a act of what could turn into a very high escalating, , tensions between several countries, including the United States, potentially getting involved as we have had several officials say that we will.
Retaliate on their behalf, which is terrifying. Alright, all of that and more, but first, go ahead and hit the subscribe button. Leave a five star review. And if you'd like, go ahead and check out my company, Ronin Basics. Ronin Basics is a Faraday goods company, and we provide several different products that protect you from the modern threats out there in society today.
Everything from EMFs, which Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has talked about at length more recently, to the Privacy intrusions that are going on between your cell phone, your laptop, every device in your house that has a microphone, tracking GPS, all of those things. So with the EMF side of things, we have EMF blocking Faraday hats.
We have beanies and we have phone sleeves that will be in, in just a couple of days. They look just like this. You. Put your phone inside of this beautiful magnetic area here. Slide your phone inside of there. It will eliminate all inbound and outbound signals from your cell phone. All right, now go check out the website.
I just did a ton of work getting it updated. I'm very happy with it. So if you've seen it before, go see it again, cause it's way better. , so go check it out. Appreciate you. Love you. Without further ado, let's jump into it.
All right. So the very first thing that we're going to talk about today is going to be the horrific hurricane that happened in North Carolina, Tennessee. It is spread across several states, which seems a little unnatural to me. I don't know when the last time there was a hurricane in Tennessee.
Can you remember that? I don't know. Maybe we should ask chat GPT, our knowledge overlord, what's going on there. So we'll go ahead and take a look at this. There's a tweet that I think really captured all of the damage. So if you're watching here on YouTube, you can actually take a look with me. And if you're not, I will talk you through it.
So there is some horrific situations going on and this captures. It in detail. It's just a minute long. So if you're listening stay with me here, but obviously what this says, I don't know why that's obvious if you're not looking at it The hurricane helene death toll has risen to over a hundred and thirty survivors Has the death toll has risen to over 130 as survivors.
That makes more sense in Western North Carolina. Describe seeing bodies stuck in trees. Locals are describing the pop apocalyptic scenes on the ground. As the official death toll continues to climb, there were bodies in the trees. They are finding bodies under the rubble. Said local woman, Alyssa Hudson, according to the New York post.
Hudson explained how she made it out of her house before it collapsed. Her friends in downtown Black Mountain describe seeing bodies floating in ditches and residents fighting against the rising tide. We were a mountain town, but now we look like a farm town. It's all destroyed. A lot of people won't be back.
The total damage from Hurricane Helene is currently projected to be about $34 billion according to Fox. The following footage was shared by Severe Forecast at Biltmore Village not far from Black Mountain. And here is that video. Make sure I don't blast you with hurricane sounds.
So there's cars just stuck up in trees. Restaurants decimated. One thing that I had seen when I was watching some of these horrible videos was that there was towns that were almost completely under rubble. Almost completely under these landslides that just went above the highest building.
And where there used to be a town, there's literally nothing. Nothing. Now could you imagine if this is your city? If your family member is there?
How terrifying. And they're, and they don't have cell phone service. You can't reach them. You can't know that they're okay.
Now, this isn't the worst of it. I've seen some re some terrible videos. And guess what? In these videos, there's nobody from the government scene. Nobody, not a single person. The national guard. Isn't there helping people? Guess where they are? They're like overseas right now. The National Guard, the same people that are supposed to be here helping our citizens are not here.
They're in other places across the world helping other people. Now speaking of that, one thing that's been frustrating, and I'm sure you can dive into the damage of this Hurricane Helene, and my heart goes out to all of these families. I can't imagine. Even just losing your town, your house, your history of your family, let alone the amount of people that we're going to find out that are dead as a result of this.
It's terrible. Now there's a few political plays going on here, which again, is disgusting shouldn't be about that. It should be about helping these citizens. And one thing that happened was that Kamala Harris was as she's always been. Kamala Harris was dead silent about the hurricane, dead silent about the families that were stranded on top of these buildings, dead silent about the damage that occurred.
Then, they had the nerve, yesterday, to come onto the TV, during an interview, at the White House, and tell the citizens that they were going, they're going to give the citizens that 1. 3 million dollars, total, combined. For Now, one of the journalists in the audience goes, Billion or million? And he says, no, no million.
1. 7. I think it even might be 1. 3. 1. 7 million dollars. Let's be generous here. And just say that it's 1. 7. That's two houses that got taken out. They're claiming they're going to use this for 750 dollars to the citizens that are affected. How far does 750 dollars get you in Kamala's mind? economy. How far?
Maybe a tank of gas and a week's worth of food. Now, one thing they don't seem to consider because they're saying that it's going to be a direct deposit is that the people that are highly affected by this don't even have access to their bank, don't have access to a grocery store around them, don't have access to even get gas.
There's reports that came in that there was a gas station, one gas station that was in this mountain town where everybody was trying to get out of. And it was empty within hours of people showing up there and now everybody else is stranded.
I cannot believe the response to this 1. 7 million, 750. If you got affected by this in the same week that we gave Ukraine 8 billion, Kamala and Joe Biden have now said, they're going to give the citizens of Ukraine. That are affected by the hurricane 1. 7 million 1. 7 million how disgusting of a response.
Don't even say that don't even mention the 1. 7 million dollars. It's a slap in the face to everybody that has been affected by this atrocity. And then speaking about that Kamala three to four days after three to four days after the hurricane posted a photo about a briefing about Hurricane Helene.
And one thing that was noticed about this photo.
Is that she's claiming that she's on her airplane. I was just briefed at FEMA by FEMA, Deanne Criswell on the latest developments about the ongoing impacts of hurricane Helene. We all discussed our administration's continued actions to support emergency response and recovery. I also spoke With North Carolina Governor Cooper about the ongoing rescue and recovery efforts in North Carolina, our administration will continue to stay in constant contact with state and local officials to ensure communities have the support and resources they need.
Doug and my thoughts are with all those who lost loved ones and those whose homes, businesses, and communities were damaged or destroyed during this disaster. Now, one thing that you'll notice about this photo, there's a few things going on here. One, she's writing on a piece of paper, a piece of paper that appears to be empty, appears to be an empty piece of paper.
Yeah, looks pretty empty to me. Number two, she's wearing headphones. She's wearing headphones that are not plugged in. Now, Donald Trump loved pointing this out, where he said, Another fake and staged photo from someone who has no clue what she is doing. You have to plug the cord into the phone for it to work.
Biden and Harris abandoned Americans in Afghanistan. They sacrificed Americans to an open border, and now they have left Americans to drown in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, and elsewhere in the South. Under this administration, Americans always come last because we have leaders who have no idea how to lead.
Now, when you went and saw the news articles about this, they were criticizing Trump for making this accusation. Not criticizing Kamala for faking her image, for faking caring about these families, but they're criticizing Trump, of course, for even having the audacity to accuse her of this. Let's see if I can find that video of the white house saying they're going to give 1.
3 million.
Let's see if I'm right on 7, because I'm interested to families affected.
This was like late yesterday, the 1st of October. Let's see.
Statement from Harris news briefing as Biden responds. Let's see.
All right. And here it is. Let me go ahead and pull this up for you. Took a second to find that. Right here is the White House briefing. And the reporter asks this question here. And this is where the 1. 7 million comes from. Hopefully you anticipate getting to some of those areas that have been cut off.
Oh, not to that. Here we go.
Not just by land, but by air as well. And how quickly do you anticipate getting to some of those areas that have been cut off because of the roads being cut off? As quickly as we can. No answer. Go ahead, Jeff. Thank you, Karine. Mr. Secretary, do you have a sense of how much money it's going to cost, A, to do this relief effort And B, to do the rebuild effort once we get there and how much of that will be covered by insurance companies and how much will be covered by the government.
So this is a multi billion dollar undertaking. In terms of the search and rescue and the response, I should note that we already Approximately 1. 7 million in individual assistance that individuals million that individuals will be able to access. I believe it'll be as early as tomorrow. It is a direct deposit into their accounts, but the rebuilding Did you catch that 1.
7 million to these people and they've the journalists. These paid journalists who are shills for the government thought that was so ridiculous, they didn't even register it. And one person goes billion, right? Billion? You're giving 1. 7 billion to those affected by Helene. And he goes no. Million.
What the fuck are they gonna do with $1.7 million? Let's say there's a hundred thousand families that are affected, and that's very low. There's so many people that are affected by this. Let's probably a million, right? You're gonna give 'em $1.30, $1.70 a dollar in 7 cents, 70 cents, $1.7 million to those affected, and they'll have it in their accounts deposited as soon as possible.
As soon as possibly tomorrow they'll get a $2. What is a million dollars going to do for all of these people affected? And again, the same week that we gave Ukraine 8 billion, the same week, 7 billion to Israel, the same exact week, this man walks up onto that stage and says, don't worry, guys, we're giving our citizens 1.
3 million.
That's going to get, what is everybody going to do? They're going to go to the corner store, walk up to the corner store and get themselves a Gatorade. Hey guys, a refreshment on us. Thanks. What a slap in the face. Just don't even mention that. Don't mention that figure. 1. 7 million to hundreds of thousands, millions of citizens that have been, had their families decimated.
They've lost all of their livestock. Their family members have been killed. And you're going to give them 1. 7 million collectively to help out. Do you want to know who's given more money to this? Their own citizens of the United States. There is a GoFundMe that was started. And I just let's watch this one more time.
So you can hear just how ridiculous this is. And I want to see what the response is of the journalists. Cause they should probably call him out on that, right? You would assume. Note that we already have approved approximately 1. 7 million dollars in individual assistance that individuals million that individuals will be able to access.
I believe it'll be as early as tomorrow. It is a direct deposit into their accounts. But the Rebuilding is something that is not for today, but that is going to be extraordinarily costly and it's going to be a multi year enterprise. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Secretary. Two questions. First, about the President's decision to go to Raleigh.
Can you give us a little bit of a breakdown as to why he's going to that location, and what he will see, and whether or not he'll be able to see any of the Alright, so literally no response by these propagandists in the audience. Not even Peter Doocy said something about this. Maybe he was the one that said billion.
Crazy, literally makes no sense. So 1. 7 million from our own government to these affected citizens from Hurricane Helene. Donald Trump posted this GoFundMe, and there's 3. 7 million, more than doubling the amount that the government's giving out. 3. 7 million by the citizens of the United States that are giving their own money.
And people here, like Stephen Wyckoff, I believe he's a former senator. I saw that one, one former senator had Donated about five hundred thousand dollars. So that may be who that was. Let's okay. So Senator Kelly Lafleur, not sure who this Stephen Wittkoff is, but that's very nice Dana White has given a hundred thousand dollars William Ackman a hundred thousand dollars Bass Pro Shops a hundred thousand dollars Dan Newlin a hundred thousand dollars Christopher Drummond You 25, 000.
Kid Rock, 25, 000. That is amazing. And here our government is sending billions to Ukraine and wants to send 1. 7 million. I cannot stress how frustrating that is enough. 1. 7 million to those affected, those decimated, those family members that were killed. Kamala's on a frickin airplane with airpods that aren't plugged in taking a propaganda photo to send it out.
Donald Trump posted a GoFundMe and gets more than double what the entire government is collectively giving those citizens. . 1.7 million dollars. That's how much they care about you. I wonder why they're giving 8 billion the same week that they're giving American citizens 1. 7 million. I wonder why.
Maybe it's because the citizens that they're going to give that money to aren't going to funnel it back to them. Aren't funding their campaigns. They don't care about the voters. They do not care about the voters. They do not care about the American public. They care about being elected and more power, which is why they'll send 8 billion to Ukraine the same week that they spend 1.
7 million to our citizens that were obliterated in a hurricane.
But thank God, there's people out there donating to this. So I highly recommend it. It is GoFundMe. com slash support dash hurricane dash Helene dash victims slash GoFundMe. Dash with dash president dash 3. 7 million. Incredible. Now there's some speculation here, some speculation around the idea that maybe, just maybe this hurricane wasn't as natural as it seemed, as it appeared.
There's some speculation that maybe, just maybe, just like there was in Lahaina, there's some questions around why. Why this targeted this specific area the way that it did let's say targeted let's use that word loosely in terms of a natural disaster But if this is true targeted is the right word the idea Comes from the fact that some of the towns that were the most decimated in these cities that were affected by this hurricane are also under contract with Blackrock and Vanguard For lithium mining, liquid gold, the thing that is the next great endeavor for our humanity, the most valuable substance today, when it comes to things like electric vehicles, when it comes to things like AI,
these small towns were fighting back against this contract proposed to sell their land for lithium, right? Go back to Lahaina, right? Go back to Lahaina. He had all these front beachfront properties. That we're trying to get pushed out by big money from black rock, big money from Vanguard. And they didn't want to sell.
That was their property. That was their family's property. That's where their grandparents lived. They're not moving right. Cue the Wolf of wall street. I ain't leaving. Then it just so happens within the year before they're supposed to start this lithium mining while also the citizens aren't selling their property.
The entire town gets obliterated by Hurricane Helene. You might say, that's a coincidence, Austin. Stop looking for strings where there are none. Tying these two things together. And I would say, I believe you. I agree with you. Until I saw some of these videos and some of the evidence surrounding how they have, since 1947, we have been able to steer hurricanes.
This is a technology that has existed for almost a hundred years. We're going to watch a video that explains all of that. But I would just say to you, how many things have we been right about? How many things? Now, it doesn't mean we're going to be right about everything. And it doesn't mean that we shouldn't have skepticism around all of these claims.
But when there's evidence, very specific evidence, just like they tried to gaslight you and tell you that the the weapons that they used those laser based weapons, right? The direct energy weapons aren't real. And then I sat here in front of you and showed you video after video of Lockheed Martin and Raytheon boasting about this technology.
Then I show you video after video about how they can start fires with that technology, videos after videos of all they need to do is put a really high altitude airplane over top of this location and boom, billions of dollars. How much is a life worth to these companies? How much is a life worth?
How much, how far would they be willing to go? What's the price tag per head that they're willing to kill or have die in a natural disaster so that they can make their profits? What's the price tag? Do you think it's 20 grand? Probably not a 10 grand, five grand. There's gotta be a calculation just like there is in the auto industry, right?
If the amount of fatalities. And the cost for the litigation does not exceed a certain amount per car. They don't update the vehicles. They don't do a recall. If they calculate go back and watch fight club. It's a great scene about this. If they calculate that the amount of litigation that's going to come as the result of not recalling it exceeds the cost.
of doing the recall itself, then they will recall it. Now reverse that. If the amount of damage, the amount of costs, that's going to be the result of a natural disaster like this, If the amount of profit exceeds what the cost would be in terms of loss of public trust, in terms of how much they have to pay for Facebook and Instagram and YouTube to censor these topics, like they did with direct energy weapons.
If the amount of that does not, the cost does not exceed the profit. They will move forward. They do not care. It isn't a LLC. It is an entity. It is a corporation, which does not have a moral compass. The only compass it has is how do we continue to have growth year after year regardless of how much Destruction we leave in our wake.
They do not care They want to sit in their high towers the top of the castle while the peasants are at the bottom drowning in the water that they brought there
So let's watch this video and see if with you think or at least have any idea The eyebrow raises that I do.
This comes from Greg Reese.
We have had the technology to create control and steer hurricanes for decades. Project Cirrus is the first official attempt to modify a hurricane. It was run by General Electric with the support of the U S military. The official theory. Project Syrus, C Y R U S, 1947, was the first time that there was a concerted effort to steer a hurricane.
Now it says, President Lyndon B. Johnson, Southwest Texas State University, 1962 said, let's see if we can get the full quote here, I'm not sure if it gives it all to us and ultimately to control the weather and he who controls the weather will control the world. He who controls the weather controls the world.
Lyndon B. Johnson, 1962 at the Southwest Texas State University. Okay, let's move on. Project Cirrus. Project Cirrus is the fir Now, there's a news article that is the Daily News. It says, Destroying a Hurricane. This is from 1947, September 17th. This is from the Daily News, the 17th year, Charlotte, O'Malley, Virgin Islands.
The destroying a hurricane, the energy expended by a tropical hurricane is enough to drive all the machinery in the world for three or four years. Yet the army, the Navy, and the general electric company are collaborating in a daring meteorological experiment, which is to determine whether or not the colossal.
that we call a hurricane can be broken by making it precipitate the thousands of cuts off. I assumed water, right? If the older attempts at rainmaking came to nothing, it is because it is not known how the raindrops are created. Some years ago, it was discovered that unless there is a nucleus, something around which, A moisture can wrap itself.
There is can be neither snowflakes nor droplets. The rest now seems simple. Little seeds of carbon dioxide, snow scattered from a plane, serve as much. Nuclei. Okay. 1947. There's your article. First official attempt to modify a hurricane. It was run by General Electric with the support of the US military 1947.
The official theory was that by changing the temperature. Outside the eyewall of a hurricane, which they did by seeding the clouds with various compounds such as silver iodide, a decrease in strong winds will result on October 13th, 1947 Project Cirrus targeted a hurricane heading out to sea. This says Project Cirrus, first hurricane cloud seeding experiment.
The cyclone was historically significant in that it was the first tropical cyclone to be modified as part of a multi year operation called Project Cirrus. In 1946, General Electric scientists concluded that experimentation that dry ice seeding could induce heavy rainfall and thus ultimately weaken storms by cooling temperatures in the eye.
To undertake Project Cirrus, General Electric, the United States Army, the Office of Naval Research, and the U. S. Weather Bureau functioned jointly on research and planning. Early on October 13th, 1947, 200 pounds of dry ice were dropped through the storm, then located about 350 miles east of Jacksonville, Florida.
While the appearance of the clouds changed, the initial results of the seeding were inconclusive. Shortly after the seeding took place, the hurricane turned sharply towards the southeastern United States. While the move the leading General Electric scientists later blamed upon the seeding, subsequent examination of the environment surrounding the storm determined that a large upper level ridge was in fact responsible for the abrupt turn.
Of course it was, because then hundreds and people died as a result of your experiment. You're not gonna admit that. Are you? Especially if you're the government. Now you have to ask yourself, is this the government doing this? Is the government going in there and manipulating these hurricanes to move this closer to this area where they want the people that funded them to go in and be able to take this lithium?
I don't think that's the case, right? This is all speculation, by the way. Maybe I'm making stuff up here. Go do the research yourself. But what I would say is it doesn't have to be that it doesn't have to be this big governmental experiment. It doesn't have to be that it has to be four or five executives paying a small team of pilots that, that all go from Blackrock in their private jets and just so happened to fly directly through a hurricane, by the way, just remembering There was a pilot that drove directly through the hurricane.
Directly through. I'll see if I can find that for you. Give me one second. Alright. Here is the plane that flew directly through the hurricane. November 610 Foxtrot Papa. Now, you can go do research on what that is. Some people are saying that it's an aerial photography company. Who cares? It's an airplane flying directly through a hurricane.
Who does that? Why would you do that? Maybe they don't even have people doing this. Maybe it's a drone. They don't need people with stories to tell, and jobs to lose, and indictments to be had to be doing this. They need five to seven executives and two people to pay somebody to fly a drone through this and drop that dry ice or whatever it is that they're doing now 85 years later.
It doesn't have to be this big government conspiracy. It could be five executives wanting to get their fucking lithium out of that city. And so they pay somebody to fly through it. They pay them to drop this cloud seeding. And then all of the sudden, it decimates Tennessee? Tennessee? When was the last time a hurricane hit Tennessee?
And then again, radio silence for days by the news. Why is the news not talking about this with the severity of it? Remember New Orleans? Remember Hurricane Katrina? Everything shut down. They were raising, we were donating in high school, middle school, elementary school. All over the country was united.
And now with this, radio silence. For days. The only reason any of us knew about this. For three days. Was because of social media. Don't be suspicious. Don't be suspicious. Okay, so there's your airplane, November 610, Foxtrot Papa. Go do some research on it. I don't have the time today to do it. But go check it out for yourself.
Maybe I'm wrong. They definitely flew through this hurricane. I wonder why. So all they have to do is fly one airplane through this hurricane, drop this cloud seating, and then all of the sudden, all of the sudden, you have a hurricane taking a sharp left turn when it wouldn't have otherwise. Here you go.
Approximately 180 pounds of dry ice was dropped into the clouds. The crew then reported a pronounced modification of the cloud deck, and the hurricane abruptly changed direction and made landfall. Alright, I just wanted to read this for you because this is the actual facts, he's giving a narrative around it, which is great, but this is the article.
October 13th, 1947, a disaster with Project Cirrus. What happened next was the worst case scenario. Instead of dissipating, the storm furiously swung nearly 130 degrees to the west. Very similar as it did with Helene. And smash in the Georgia where it caused $2 million worth of damage. Threats of lawsuits soon followed with Georgia residents Blaming the government in 1947 for the hurricane devastation Project Serious was all but shut down before it truly began, and any research into weather manipulation was re Reddit.
Re reputated Repe Repudiated . R-E-P-U-D-I-T-E-D. Repu, repudiated, it's a weird word for decades. All near Savannah, Georgia, the public blamed the government Irving Langmuir who pioneered General Electric's atmospheric research department and admitted that the project was about learning how to weaponize the weather.
Also claimed the reversal of the hurricane had been caused by Project Cirrus, but the government denied it for 12 years. After a short delay, the project. Okay, again. Let's go back, he's telling the narrative, but there's facts up on the screen for you. And what this said, if we can go back, let's see here.
And I do want to tell you the source here, this is Gregory's he's a InfoWars submission guy, like he does a lot of their great videos. Listen to the narrative, don't listen to the narrative, look up these newspapers. Don't take my word for it. Don't take his word for it. Go find these newspapers.
The Lincoln Journal Star, Sunday, May 1st, 1955. Hurricane seeding. Langmuir and cloud seeding during Project Cirrus in the New Mexico Desert was conducted at regular weekly intervals and Midwest rain begins to fall weekly too. The scientist described another test in October of 1947 where It's he said a hurricane was seeded.
It changed course, hitting the city of Savannah, Georgia, doing heavy damage. So that was him admitting that was a cause of that hurricane. Let's move on. This is the story 12 years after a short delay, the project officially continued and in 1965 Project Storm Fury had targeted Hurricane Betsy for seeding on that day.
The storm immediately changed direction and made landfall in southern Florida. This comes from the Liberty Beacon says yes, the government has experimented with controlling hurricanes. Hurricane Betsy was building strength. It looked like it was aiming for South Carolina, posing no threat to South Florida.
But on Saturday, September 4th, the storm whirled to a stop about 350 miles east of Jackson when Betsy started moving again on Sunday. She had changed directions. The storm plowed through the Bahamas Monday night, then mauled Florida. Or South Florida. A day later, Florida Congress blamed it on Project Storm Fury, but the government claimed that the hurricane shifted before they ever had a chance to seed it.
And after two months of congressional hearings, the project was allowed to continue. In 1997, US Defense Secretary William Cohen, admitted we have the technology to control the weather. Okay, this comes from DODs News, defense Briefing United States. Department of Defense website January 15th, 2006.
It's an article from 2000 or 1997 and it says Cohen's keynote address to the Congress on terror or conference on terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and us strategy at the Georgia center. Mahler auditorium, university of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. The event is a part of the Sam Nunn policy forum being hosted by the university of Georgia.
Senator Nunn. Thank you very much. As Senator Nunn has. And indicated he and I have worked for many years along the Senator Lugar. The two of these gentlemen, I feel perhaps the most courageous and visionary have served in the Senate. Let's see if it actually goes into Including earthquakes and volcanoes.
Says Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen. Monday, April 28th, 8 45 a. m. It says Tuffler has written about these, this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories, Different things. Trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific. Ooh, imagine that.
So they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races, and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco type of terrorism, where they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
The U. S. government has placed gag orders on employees of the National Weather Service. In October of 2012, after Hurricane Sandy weakened to a tropical storm, microwave imagery shows a thick red beam. Now this says that you can the website for this is morphedintegratedmicrowaveimagery. com C-I-M-S-S version one.
The hurricane in the time of this type of energy was 2012 October 27th. And you can go look for that yourself, but there is this red wave that goes directly at the hurricane that is going away is dissipating. Then all of a sudden, immediately followed by Sandy growing into a category one hurricane and taking an unexplained left turn into New Jersey.
The push towards alternative energy demands more lithium and according to the US Geological Survey. The United States has over six million tons of identified lithium resources. The majority of this lithium has been identified in Kings Mountain, North Carolina. Kings Mountain is believed to have one of the largest resources in the world, but the biggest problem is that people live there and they don't want their quiet towns turned into lithium mines.
People in Cherryville have been pushing against a proposed lithium mine for the last several years, but everyone we spoke with here said it's too divisive of an issue to share their opinion on camera. Cherryville is a small, quiet town. I think that's good that we keep it small. so quiet. Many don't feel comfortable speaking out against Piedmont Lithium's proposed mining operation nearby.
I think we're a silent majority. I think a lot of people are afraid to say anything about it because they are bringing a lot to the town as far as money. Last year, the Department of Defense entered a 90 million agreement. Okay, DOD enters agreement to expand domestic lithium mining for U. S. battery supply chains.
The 90 million agreement entered into the Defense Production Act, Title III authorities, and utilizing funds appropriately by the Inflation Reduction Act will help support Abler Marley's planned reopening of the Kings Mountain, North Carolina, lithium mine to increase domestic production of lithium for the nation's battery supply chain.
Estimates that Kings Mountain will be operational between 2025 and 2030. With Alba Marley Corporation to increase domestic production of lithium for the nation's battery supply chain, specifically from Kings Mountain, North Carolina, starting by 2025. This is the same area experiencing what is being described as biblical floods.
While the federal government spends billions on foreign wars and illegal immigrants, they simply cannot be bothered with the health and well being of the American people, especially those living on coveted mineral rich land. Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
The family's devastation there. So I think You have three questions to ask yourself about this hurricane and this conspiracy. Can they do it? Can they do it? Now we know the answer is yes. Would they do it? If there's enough money involved, we know absolutely they would do it. Check. Did they do it?
That's the question that needs to be answered, but the first two are answered 100%. Can they do it? Yes. They can manipulate the weather and specifically hurricanes to make this type of movement inward towards shore. They can manipulate it to go where they want it to go, at least in some sense, right? The accuracy of that moving, but it obliterated almost, a fifth of the country towards that lower area.
So can they do it? Yes. Yes. Would they do it if the price tag is high enough? Yes, absolutely. We know that Blackrock and Vanguard will go to any lengths to make profits. Did they do it?
I'll leave that one to you. And maybe we'll see some type of evidence that comes out more here in the near future. So let's see if there's anything else on that. And then we will move on to the next topic. All right. So there's several people talking about this. There's several clips that have gone.
Quote unquote viral about this. And here are some of those. Let's see if we can pull it up here.
All right. This is the one that I probably found to be the best. I'll tell you what I find suspicious as shit, that one of the areas affected by hurricane Helene is the world's largest lithium deposit. And the DOD just entered into an agreement with this company right here to mine lithium for electric cars.
Starting in 2025. Now that area is completely devastated. This is a 90 million agreement between the D. O. D. And this company right here to get Kings Mountain North Carolina lithium mine up and running by 2030. If that area has been inundated, it's in a disaster zone. then the government can come in and do eminent domain and they can pay you what it was worth five years ago rather than what it's worth right now.
Imagine that your home has turned into a watery lot and the government comes to you and says, Hey, I'll pay you what you paid for it. You're going to take it and you're going to go, right? What do you think is going to happen right here now that they want this lithium mine up and running by 2025 2030 at the latest?
Back in 1947 we had the Florida Georgia hurricane or hurricane nine and it was the first hurricane to be targeted for weather modification. What happened was General Electric said, The U. S. Navy, the Army, the Air Force, they poured dry ice into this hurricane using airplanes to see what would happen.
Would they slow it down? What happened was it slowed down a little bit, but it turned west really sharp. Let me show you. This is the path that the hurricane took in 1947. Does it look similar to you? Probably not. It's a coincidence, right? Moving on. I'm sure this is just another coincidence, but do you know who owns the most shares in that lithium mine?
BlackRock and Vanguard. Yep, so everything I just told you just from her voice. Now, the one thing that's interesting about that is the imminent domain conversation, which is the fact that was brought up when it came to Lahaina too. If this is a devastated land, the government can basically take control of that land, claim an imminent domain, pay out those people for that, not based on what is the mineral rich underneath that, the amount of materials that they can siphon from it, which would be the fair market value.
But, what they paid for it five years ago, before this contract was even entered, and before they even knew that there was lithium there. Sounds like a good reason, and motivating enough for them. To me. Okay. Let's move on here. But let's touch on this first. Remember that one time where Kamala said that disaster relief should be based on equity?
Also an interesting thing to note. Yeah, remember we talked about that before. I forget the, which hurricane was that. That was for Hurricane Ian. She said that, and here it is.
Oh, shit. Let's see if we can get it to play from right here. Here we go. It is our lowest income communities and our communities of color that are most impacted and most impacted. By these extreme conditions and impacted by issues that are not of their own making. And so when Absolutely. And women.
Yeah. And so we have to address this in a way that is about giving resources based on equity, understanding that we fight for equality, but we also need to fight for equity, understanding not everyone starts out at the same place. Yeah. Marxism. And if we want people to drown based on their income.
Sometimes we have to take into account those disparities. And do that work. Yeah. Yeah. That could be your next president, folks. Alright, now that leads us to our next discussion. which is about the longshoremen. I think it was called the portshoremen. Not terribly inaccurate, but also not true. The longshoremen, international longshoremen's association.
All right. This guy is the one kind of leading the discussion. I believe he might be like the president of the union or something like that. I'm sure we'll find out in just a moment, but Very chilling words. And if you're an American citizen, this should frustrate the hell out of you, right? All of these unions, these strikes, these, all of this, look, I get it.
You have to negotiate for fair wages and there's a certain way to go about that. And having a union is. If you're somebody who works in this type of job, and you also want to decimate the economy for a 50 percent raise on your 150, 000 salary. Now, I'm not saying these guys don't deserve that type of money.
I'm not saying that they're in the complete wrong here in terms of making the strike, but understanding what could be the potential outcome for this as a result. It's pretty terrifying too. Now, maybe you'd put that back onto the longshoremen the organizations that they work for and say, Hey, maybe you should pay them more.
Maybe you should stop the automation. We'll talk about all of that, which is the reasons why they actually are going on this type of strike. Let's go ahead and watch. But
today's world, it's changing into the future. They're not making millions no more. They're making billions and they're spending it fast as they make it. I want a piece of that for my men because when they made their most money was during COVID. When my men had to go through Go to work on those peers every single day when everybody stayed home and went to work, not my men, they died out there with the virus.
We all got sick with the virus. We kept them going from Canada, the main of Texas, Great Lakes, Puerto Rico. Now the Bahamas, everybody went to work during COVID. Nobody stayed home. I want to be compensated for that. I'm not asking for the world. They know what I want. They know what they want. And if they don't then I have to go into the street and we have to fight for what we rightfully deserve.
These people today don't know what a strike is. When my men hit the from Maine to Texas. Every single port, a lockdown, what's going to happen. I'll tell you. First week be all over the news every night. Boom, boom. Second week guys who sell cars can't sell cars because the cars ain't coming in off the ships.
They get laid off. Third week mall starts. closing down. They can't get the goods from China. They can't sell clothes. They can't do this. Everything in the United States comes on a ship. They go out of business. Construction workers get laid off because the materials aren't coming in. The steel is not coming in.
The lumber is not coming in. They lose their job. Everybody's hating the longshoremen now because now they realize how important Our jobs are. Now I have the president screaming at me. I'm putting a Taft Hartley on you. Go ahead. Taft Hartley means I have to go back to work for 90 days. That's a cooling off period.
Do you think when I go back for 90 days, those men are going to go to work on that pier? It's going to cost the money, the company's money, to pay their salaries it went from 30 moves an hour, maybe to eight. They're going to be like this. Who's going to win here in the long run? You're better off sitting down, and let's get a contract, and let's move on with this world.
And in today's world, I'll cripple you. I will cripple you, and you will have no idea what that means. Nobody does. I love the nice music at the end there. I will cripple you, not I will cripple you, the longshoreman's associate or the organizations that they work for. No, I will cripple the men and women. He even said it in there.
I will cripple the car salesman. I will cripple the small business owners. I will cripple the American family trying to get food to their table. Right now you want to talk about what they're trying to negotiate here, what they want out of this strike. They want a five year. A five year 50 percent raise.
They currently make about 150, 000. They want a five year 50 percent raise 10 percent every year for the next five years. The other part of this was about automation. They want to have the companies that they work for stop using automation. Apparently on the previous contract that they utilized, and this comes from a video I watched, I haven't validated the contracts, but allegedly they want it.
The organizations that they work for to promise. They won't use AI promise. They won't use automation promise that they won't take their jobs eventually over time. Like every other industry is dealing with the same thing that we have saw with the writer's strike, right? How long did it take for them to come to an agreement?
Almost a year. It was like eight months, maybe even longer, right? That's why all the movies sucked for all of last year. So the question is what's going to come from this, right? And what is the expectation here? Yeah. If you don't move with the times, you're going to expect them to just never use automation, never use AI.
And if they do, you're all going to quit. Doesn't that just Speed up the use of automation. China's already doing this. China is already all of their longshoremen, all of their seaports that are taking in all of their goods or shipping it more than likely, if you're in China, all of those are already automated.
There's videos out there that you can watch right now. These guys that sit behind the computer and they're working nine to 10 screens, all telling these vehicles where to go and what to pick up and how to move it and all this stuff. So they're hyper efficient compared to what we're doing. How do you expect it to not move that direction?
And you're just going to sit on your butt and go, okay, don't do it. Or I'm going to, I'm not going to work. What is the expectation here? And how is that a solution to the problem? Why not develop a strategic agreement or Alliance or profit sharing agreement that if there is automation, that there is a longstanding percentage of that automation profitability that goes towards retirement funds, there's one solution.
Why not? Go build out the automation themselves. Why not start a company that then has the ability to, or it has the foresight to service the vehicles, right? If you have a contract on any of these automations that are then in the future, the first right to contract for the, that money. goes to any previous longshoreman, right?
So any of the automation that is being built, any of the maintenance that is being done, any of the assistance that needs to happen on the ports, all of that business immediately goes to the people who were previously hired as longshoremen. Maybe that's their agreement, but the idea that there's just never going to utilize automation and you're just going to outlast technology is just silly.
So come to a better agreement, figure it out in a way that's actually useful because this is not. These guys are going to cripple the American economy. So let's get some context here. This article comes from ConstructionDive. com, and it says, work stoppages across east and west east and Gulf Coast ports may cause product shortages, price hikes, and delivery issues, construction experts say. This was published yesterday, October 1st, 2024. It says, as the International Longshoremen's Association went on strike this morning over a new master contract, construction pros across the country are waiting to see how the walkout.
which affects ports from Texas to Maine will impact their businesses. The ILA's talks with the United States Maritime Alliance broke down over wages and a total ban on the automation of machinery important to dock work, including cranes, gates, and container moving trucks. According to the Associated Press, the strike is the first by the union since 1977.
The impacted reports are some of the main points of entry for construction materials, heavy machinery, food, vehicles, chemicals, according to the Wall Street Journal. Material delivery delays could also incur in other regions of the country, according to Manufacturing Dive. Exports of oil, liquefied natural gas at Gulf Coast ports will likely be unaffected due to the ILA has little or no involvement in those operations.
Bill Fleming, Senior Vice President at the New York based consulting firm, Cumming Group, weird name said that impacts of the strike should be felt immediately in the construction industry. Okay, so this is very specific to construction. Combine that with hurricane induced shortages, it starts to bring up.
This could be catastrophic. For the U S infrastructure. So there's a little bit more context. I'd like maybe a little bit more but I think you get the idea. It's all about AI. It's all about automation. It's about eliminating some of their jobs and them wanting higher pay. So not only do you want us to not use AI to lower our overhead costs.
You also want us to pay you more, which is only again, going to speed along the automation track. Automation is not going away. What is going to go away is the people who don't jump on board with helping to build that future, right? If you were somebody who is I don't know, what's a good example of an old job that is lost.
If you were a factory worker in building Model Ts by hand. You probably weren't going to decide not to work anymore once they decided to bring in some machines, right? If you were a horse and buggy taxi driver, you're not gonna decide not to drive a car, right? There's a new way to do what you do and to help push along the production line.
You just have to figure out what that part is. And see it soon enough to play a part, right? Don't fight against this. It's going to, it's going to happen. There's going to be automation, right? Maybe you get your raise because you add more skills around automation. Not just eliminate it, the use all together, right?
Seems silly to me and the fact that they're going to shut down our country over some Ridiculous claim that there's going to not be any automation or AI integrated into this type of industry is ridiculous It's never gonna happen There's always going to be the next best thing and movement in industry and for them to say we're going to Cripple small business owners.
We're going to cripple small businesses Young families, we're going to cripple the entire us economy until we get our way. We get a 50 percent rate, a 50 percent salary increase off of our 150, 000 a year salary. I'm not saying they don't deserve that. They deserve that. And they probably deserve more.
It's a freaking hard job. It's a crazy difficult job. I'm not discounting that. But what I am saying is that you can't fight back against automation. It's going to happen. And if you don't do it, your company is going to go under. Because another company is going to come in and do it at a lower cost. Or they're going to outsource that work to other people and you're just going to lose your job altogether.
So that's where we're at with that. Now there's people sounding the alarm. There was lines outside the door at Costco yesterday, people bulk purchasing toilet paper and dry goods so that if, and when the supply chain fails over the next couple of weeks that they have what they need. Now, I'm not saying you need to go do that.
I'm not saying not to do it, probably a good idea, always to have reserves of food, reserves of water, reserves of gas, I'm not sure if there's a way to really do that, but if there was, you should probably do that generators, all of that stuff, guys just, if we've learned anything over the last four to five years, there is going to be some sort of catastrophic event that cuts us off from the grid, there's going to be supply chain shortages, COVID was just a glimpse into that.
Maybe start to do something about that. Not specifically because of this, but just because you should, right? Because if it's not, this is going to be something else be prepared. All right, now moving on, let's go ahead and pull the next article up. There is escalating tensions. Oh, we got one more thing here.
One more thing. Let's see. Let's see this one more article and then we'll move on. Cause I think we got it. This is a big deal, guys. Let's watch this one. Same guy. Knocking down doors. She's trying to stop this. She's trying to get us to a media where we can have a fair negotiations. It's the companies that don't want to.
They don't want to sit here and be fair. So that's why we're out here fighting for our livelihood. What more from the automation do you want? What more protections could there be? What more? Yeah, they have language in there now. Not strong enough. Because what happens is they come in with new technology.
We just caught them in Mobile, Alabama called Autogate. And that means the trucks are coming in and they're already checked in somewhere else and not using the checkers in the I. L. A. Circa vetting the contract. They don't care. They don't care. It's not fair, and if we don't put our foot down now, they would like to run over us, and we're not going to allow that.
You are going to grind the economy to a halt here on the East Coast and the Gulf Coast. No, not us. They are. Don't spin it now, because you're Fox News. They're going to drive it. But are you worried? Are you worried that this drive They have the capital. to settle this thing. Are you worried that this strike is going to hurt the everyday American, the farmers that need to reach the export market?
They're telling me that they're going to hurt. You start to realize who the longshoremen are, right? People never gave a about us until now, when they finally realized that The chain is being broke now. Cars won't come in. Food won't come in. Clothing won't come in. You know how many people depend on our jobs?
Half the world! And it's time for them, and time for Washington, to put so much pressure on them, to take care of us because we took care of them and we're here 135 years and brought them where they are today and they don't want to share. Fox Business Lydia Hu joins us now from the port of Newark in New Jersey and I've been following you.
We have been as you've done this story for us and now the rubber has met the road and he feels like he's dug in and feels like he's in a strong position. Is he in as strong a position as he thinks or appears to seem to be? He certainly feels like he's in a strong position, and he's probably looking around at other unions and the wage gains and the record contracts that they have notched in recent years.
Just last year, the West Coast port workers got a new contract with a 32 percent wage hike. Over four years. So now Mr Daggett, the president is looking at that and saying we want that and better just yesterday, Dana, Mr Daggett rejected port management's offer of a 50 percent wage hike over eight years.
Just to give you an idea of where they stand right now. It does seem like the two sides are still far apart, but he does at least see Wow, so you see this guy is on a power hungry streak, right? Again, they have a fair contract 80 or 50 percent increase over eight years Seems pretty fair to me the idea that there's already language in the contracts that say that they can't use automation Seems pretty fair to me bring up the litigation against the company, right?
Go to the court with them Don't cripple the entire country all of the small business owners Families trying to feed their children. Because you want to be selfish And again, You're just going to get replaced. This is so stupid. What are you doing? Ridiculous. These unions are a problem, dude.
These are, these unions are they, The union, that guy is an absolute idiot. He's sitting there, riling up his team, Getting their, these, So let's move on to something just, if not more pressing, which is the next stages leading up to potentially world war three, as we've seen, go back and search my podcast and look for world war three, we've seen the Russia, Ukraine, we've seen that I ran, or we've seen Israel and Hamas, we've seen Iran now, and Israel, Iran has openly attacked Israel.
is now attacking back. In light of that, there is Russia escalating tensions. There was a fighter jet yesterday, a Russian SU 35 pilot going right by an F 16 near Alaska in our own airspace. This is how they're treating us. This
fighter jet flies within two feet of our F 16, two feet, and then takes off.
Pretty sweet. The pilot goes, holy fuck. Yeah, holy fuck. But, that just shows you, they're willing to go to these lengths. And when you look at the BRIC you look at that alliance, you look at the downfall that's happening with the U. S. dollar. You look at the conversations that are being had between Russia and China, India, right?
We're, this is not a, this is not a winning battle for us. We should not be in these wars. We should not be the proxy funding capital of the world. Let Israel fight it out. We have nothing to do with this. Now, the U. S. has sent another aid package to Israel. And Biden has directed the U. S. military to shoot down Iranian missiles targeting Israel.
It says U S president Joe Biden. This comes from business standard and vice president Kamal Harris are monitoring an Iranian attack against Israel from the white house state situation room and receiving regular updates from their national security team. According to the white house situation room update, president Biden directed the U S military aid to aid Israel's defense against Iranian attacks and shoot down missiles that are targeting Israel on Tuesday in a major escalation in the raging conflict in the middle East.
Iran launched a missile attack on Israel on Tuesday. To start a sentence with on Tuesday and end it with on Tuesday is crazy. In a statement, the IDF said all Israeli citizens are in bomb shelters as rockets from Iran are fired at Israel. Hezbollah is upset that the IDF exposed their plans to massacre Israelis, this says, so they decided to target innocent civilians by firing a barrage of rockets, the IDF further said.
102 missiles have been launched towards Israel. According to the Jerusalem Post, sirens continue to sound across Israel amid the attack. The Times of Israel reported, according to the IDF, around 10 million civilians are the targets of Iranian projectiles. Okay, I'm not sure I'm taking the IDF's opinion on really anything at this point.
Maybe there's a better quote or source that we can utilize because we know it's all propaganda on both sides, all the way across. There was also a terrorist attack yesterday that killed, I think, eight civilians in Israel. Two men with guns that opened fire just before. Terrible. Horrible.
No good. Very bad day. This is ridiculous. We shouldn't be involving ourselves. We all know that the United States is going to put its nose where it doesn't belong. We all know that we are the ones that are fighting Iran. We are the ones that are fighting Russia. We are the ones aiding the both of these countries would have absolutely no chance if it wasn't for our money and they wouldn't even be in the wars to begin with.
But they're going to send your sons and daughters to die so that Israel has a chance in this war and so that Ukraine can continue giving 10 percent to the big guy. Here's a video again coming from Alex Jones. I think the more and more we get into this crazy scenario or this crazy simulation, the more we find Alex Jones stuff out, you bull.
Now again, it's Alex Jones. Take it with a grain of salt. He's been right about a ton of stuff. He's been wrong about a few things, just like all of us. But here is his video that I thought was decently well done.
And it's only going to get worse until people wake up and you will wake up one way or another. You may wake up when the drones are flying down the street and the big trash trucks, robot driven, are pulling up and getting the dead bodies and your wife and kids are dead. And for some reason you're immune to the new virus and you're sitting there with the electricity off and no food and half the city's dead.
And just know that often luxurious places that people like Zuckerberg will be in their bunkers while we're all dying.
Our people are everywhere and they're watching the enemy. And when we all jump on their private jets this week, next month, a year from now, whatever it is, and the private airports are full, all the establishment and their minions loaded up with all their crap flying off to their armored fortresses, that's another key to know when they're about to pull the trigger on a new bio weapon.
Or a nuclear war. But after the dust settles, we know where to get the medicine and food we need as survivors, don't we? And that's what matters at the end. Is we will get these people. I may not be around for it, and a lot of you won't be around for it. But don't get on the bus when they tell you they're relocating you for your safety when all the food and energy's off.
Because you go to that forced labor camp, you ain't ever coming back. This is how it works in history. Happens all the time. People forget freedom. They don't stand up for themselves and the tyrants take over. And they don't just not care about you. They hate you. They want to hurt you. I always hear, Oh, the new order doesn't care about the people.
Oh, the Democrats don't care. Oh, they do care. They love partying and taking drugs and getting their hair done and flying around on private jets while your kids are all locked up at the house with you and you're going bankrupt. They enjoy hurting you. It makes them enjoy their lives so much more. And hey, only people you got to blame is yourself, right?
I'm not saying you're to blame. They obviously are the really bad people. But, hey, I get it. A lot of fun stuff. A lot of movies to see. A lot of concerts. Let somebody else handle that. The new order is gonna handle you. They're making their move. You're like they'll never get away with that.
This is America. Have you looked around, boys and girls, at where we are? And how fast things are going downhill.
Not to be alarmist or anything, it's a very alarmist video. But we've never been closer to a third world war. Never. Not in this very moment right here.
Never been closer. This is not our fight. There's no reason we should be sending troops over there. There's no reason our navy ships should be shooting that, shooting down their missiles. Let the IDF handle it. Let the Israeli military handle it. Let Ukraine handle it. If they can't handle the war, that's what happens.
Ukraine isn't even a NATO based country. They're not an ally in the same way that we are obligated to defend them. This escalating tensions needs to stop. How? How far do we have to go towards the line of war before American people start to stand up and say something about it? Does there have to be a military draft and then we're gonna, then we're gonna stand up?
For a war that we shouldn't be involved in that doesn't have anything to do with us? Nobody's attacking us. We are not the good guys here. I'm not saying there is a good guy, but it's definitely not us. So it goes back to the original conversation, and not, again, not to be alarmist with that video. It's just a cool video, but if you saw it.
But but, he made some great points. The government is going to cause this chaos. All of the people who are worth any amount of money that has the ability to is going to fly off to their private little oasises next to Epstein Island, in their underground bunkers. They're gonna ship us off into shipping containers.
At least that's what the depiction showed there, right? It's the way that this could go is terrible and history has shown us time and time again So hopefully this is wrong. Hopefully none of that happens hopefully the Iran and Israeli conflict stays between those two countries But only time will tell So that is what I will leave you guys with today.
Thank you for listening I love you. Glad to be back today to talk to you and I'll see you next time on the items archive. Go check out RoninBasics. com. Get yourself a Faraday baseball hat to block the EMFs. Get yourself a Faraday phone bag to stop all inbound and outbound signals and tracking of your GPS and to eliminate the distraction of your cell phone that's around you all the time.
Get one for your child to put away during the study time. Beanie's RFID blocking wallets. Check it out. RoninBasics. com. Even if you just want to see how cool the damn website looks because it looks really cool. Created it designed it myself. So thank you guys. I appreciate you. And have a great day.
-
Welcome to The Adams Archive
Dive deep into the shadows with Austin Adams as he unearths the hidden truths behind today's most controversial topics. The Adams Archive isn't just a podcast—it's a journey into the unseen, the unexplored, and the unsettling realities that shape our world. With a fearless approach and a commitment to uncovering the facts, Austin brings you stories that others won't.
Summary:
In a world where information is controlled and narratives are spun, The Adams Archive cuts through the noise to bring you the raw, unfiltered truth. Across our episodes, we delve into the intricate web of politics, culture, and technology, exposing the undercurrents that mainstream media often ignores.
We begin by unraveling the chilling details of the recent security threat against Donald Trump. Austin takes you on a deep dive into the background and history of the individual behind this plot, revealing a complex tapestry of foreign mercenary work and potential ties to international entities.
Transitioning from political intrigue to the complexities of the entertainment industry, we discuss the legal issues surrounding P Diddy. By exploring the allegations and controversies that have surfaced, we shed light on the hidden machinations of fame, power, and accountability.
As we navigate these turbulent waters, we also tackle the growing issue of censorship in social media. With Meta's recent ban on RT, the Russian media outlet, we discuss the implications of corporate control over information and the impact on global narratives.
Each episode seamlessly weaves these topics together, providing a comprehensive understanding of the forces at play behind the headlines. Austin's insightful analysis and investigative prowess make The Adams Archive a must-listen for anyone seeking the truth.
If you're ready to see beyond the surface and question the official story, hit that subscribe button now! Join us on YouTube, Substack, and all our social media platforms to stay updated on the latest episodes and exclusive content. Your support fuels our mission to bring you the unvarnished truth.
Thank you for being a part of The Adams Archive community. Together, we're uncovering the realities that matter.
All the Links:
For easy access to all our content and platforms, visit: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams----more----
Full Transcription
Hello, you beautiful people, and welcome to The Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we are going to be doing a deep dive into the background and history of the individual who conducted the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump's life in just 65 days.
Now, the reason that we can have almost a full episode on this is because there is so much to discuss. Whereas the last individual was some 20 year old with very little history that was, was able to even be pulled up, let alone be able to indicate something much, much deeper going on. But that is not the case today.
This individual has years, dozens of years of history conducting what seems like a foreign, foreign mercenary work. And so we'll dive into the history of that. We'll talk about the potential ties. We'll look at who he's been associated with in the past. We'll even look at some of the, the articles that I was able to dig up myself, his criminal history, all of it.
Now on top of that, what we're going to open with today is the fact that P Diddy is now going to jail. So we'll read that article, if you've listened to that episode a little bit ago, where I did a whole deep dive on the court documents. It is horrific. So we will discuss that too. And we will also discuss Meta Banning RT, which is the Russian media outlet.
So, all of that and more coming up. Make sure you stick around, but first go ahead and hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review and head over to ronanbasics. com this hat on my head, this phone sleeve in my hand. If you are watching here on YouTube, all our Faraday products, Faraday products help you to be protected against the modern threats that are from your technology.
So things like your cell phone, your wifi router, your microwave, all of the technology around you emits. EMF radiation. Now, the hat is there to protect your brain. It has actually been shown in scientific studies, which is interesting to me that were done with a double blind placebo study with mice. The fact that EMFs actually target your brain.
It's almost like a, um, um, it's almost like a receiver for this type of radiation and it can cause terrible types of cancer. All right. So you can get yourself a EMF blocking Faraday hat. You can also get yourself an EMF blocking phone sleeve. Now this is actually more interesting because this stops your phone from getting all inbound and outbound signals.
Now you might say, what is the use case? And I think I've heard that a couple times now. And to me, the way that I've been using this is it completely stops any distractions I have, whether I'm at work, hanging out with my wife, my kids, whatever it is, I can put my phone in there and know I'm not going to be distracted by any of the notifications, phone calls, text messages that are coming in.
And it also stops you from being tracked. Um, all of the GPS signals go away. Your, your phone cannot listen into your conversations, your, your camera's right there on the back of it. So all of that, check it out, ronanbasics. com. And you can get 15 percent off by putting your email and phone number in when the pop up comes up.
All right, so head over there, check it out. And without further ado, let's jump. Oh, and by the way, that's my company. That's my company. Go show your support. Come on. Let's jump. Into it.
The Adams archive.
Hello. What? Hello. All right. Let's go ahead and jump into it here. The very first article that we're going to discuss is coming from CNN. Nonetheless. Now, the reason I found this to be ironic is the fact that Oh, the irony involved in it. MetaBan's Russian state media outlet RT over foreign interference activity.
Hmm. That's interesting. So let's go ahead and read this because the irony that this article sits on CNN is hilarious because if Facebook's gonna going to remove any news outlet that is associated with the government and pushing propaganda, The first one that they would have to remove would be CNN. So, uh, here we go.
It says, Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram announced Monday, let me go ahead and share this with my screen here if you're watching, um, announced Monday that it has banned Russian state media broadcaster RT and other Kremlin controlled networks alleging the outlets have engaged in deceptive influence operations and attempted to evade detection.
After careful consideration, we expanded our ongoing enforcement against Russian state media outlets, uh, I don't know how you pronounce that. RT and other related entities are now banned from our apps globally for foreign interference activity, a meta spokesperson said in a statement. Prior to Monday's ban, RT had 7.
2 million followers on Facebook and 1 million followers on Instagram. RT did not immediately respond to CNN for comment. The move comes days after the U. S. Justice Department Announced charges against two RT employees for funneling nearly 10 million into a U. S. company identified by CNN as Tenant Media to create and amplify content that aligned with Russian interests.
The Covert Influence campaign was aimed at the American public ahead of the 2024 U. S. presidential election. U. S. presidential election. Tenet Media boasts a slate of high profile right wing pro Trump commentators, including Tim Poole, Dave Rubin, Benny Johnson, and several others. All of them have released statements saying that they are victims of the alleged Russian scheme.
After the Justice Department announced Announcement RT responded with mocking statements that did not address it was actually pretty hilarious the response that they made they like basically just laughed at them The Kremlin commented that in the band that by meta on Tuesday with these actions meta is discrediting itself This complicates the prospect prospects for normalizing our relations with meta.
Definitely somewhat true Now where I see this being a problem Is the fact that if you're going to run with that, essentially, you're now saying that if anybody's a state run media that is pushing any type of propaganda, you know, like the CIA interfering with our elections, the NIH having a portal to discuss what content should be removed from Metta and Twitter and all of these other organizations, right?
Like, We know 100 percent they have the same access to the news outlets. So what is the, what is the, the bar here being set? Because if this is the bar, almost every single major news outlet has to get kicked off of Facebook and Instagram. It says executives from Meta, Microsoft and F, uh, Microsoft and Alphabet, which owns Google are expected to testify before the Senate intelligence committee on Wednesday on their platforms work to combat foreign relations to us elections.
So. This is them trying to fix without fixing the election, right? They're not going to do it in the same way. Mark Zuckerberg said, well, he just said this. Mark Zuckerberg just said he wasn't going to interfere. Not allowing a, the organization which is representing essentially a country in their, their position on news news.
to be seen by citizens. Why? Because you think we're stupid. This is where the privacy or the, the, the conversation surrounding censorship really bothers me. Like who are you to discern anything? Who are you to tell me who to listen to and who not to listen to? Right? Like that would be your mom and your dad in high school telling you, Oh, that's a bad friend.
Don't listen to them. It's like, no, let me judge for myself. I'm an adult. I'm intelligent. Very, very, very intelligent. likely much more intelligent than any individual of the government that's making these types of decisions. So let me use my discernment, because you don't get to tell me what's truth, and what's not truth.
Who's a, a factually based network, and who's not? That's not how this works. Freedom of speech has to go both ways, right? Now it says, uh, well, this is the CNN comment section, so this should be interesting. It says if they are banning deceptive influence operations, then the Harris campaign must be next.
Yeah. Uh, yeah. Okay, so moving on. I thought that to be interesting. It is, it is quite ironic that it is META that is banning all of these, you know, the Russian state media when they were the ones taking directions from our government. They were the controlled media. They were, that's exactly who they were.
And now they're, they're just doing what they're being told again by the Harris campaign, because they don't want any, any information or news coming out from the entities that want to, I don't know, stop the war that they're in and not continue it like Kamala Harris would. So there you go. All right. Now let's look at this real quick.
Let's see if they have a list of all of the influencers. Who were involved in this investigation?
Hmm. According to the indictment, some of the creators were told the project was being bankrolled by a man named Edward Gregorian. Let's see the indictment.
I don't see a list here.
Here we go. Alright, let's see the indictment. Where are the names? Where are the names? Hmm. Let's see. Let's see. New YouTube's Edward Gregorian. Founder 1 accepted interim payments. So 8, 000 per month plus a percentage of any deals that Founder 1 closed with influencers. Influencer talent scouting. I want to see what the name of that was.
Anyways, maybe for another time after I've done the research. But interesting, none the less. All right, moving on. This one is big. P Diddy was arrested in New York after a grand jury indictment. P Diddy is going to jail now, my friends. Finally, this human piece of garbage is getting what he deserves after 30 years, almost, in the music industry, tormenting, terrorizing, and blackmailing everybody in the industry, including celebrities, athletes, you name it.
He was blackmailing them, politicians, all of them. He was the, the P Diddy was the Epstein of the music industry and is now arrested in jail in New York. Thank God. Now, this article comes from the post millennial. It says Sean Diddy Combs has been arrested after a grand jury indictment in Manhattan on Monday.
The New York times has spoke with somebody who is not authorized to speak about it. What? Who spoke with somebody who was not authorized to speak about it. Okay. That's a weird statement. said that the, but I'm going to speak on it. And they said charges in the indictment were not immediately clear. A federal official said in the spring.
Uh, so now if you go back, I could just riff off of this one. I'll put this down for a second, but if you go back, do you, if you do not remember what was happening, essentially there was a music producer named little rod and little rod essentially went after. P. Diddy for trying to blackmail him. He was, he was saying that P.
Diddy was, uh, he was in a room when he shot somebody that he threatened to eat his face, that he put him in a position where Cuba Gooding Jr. was making sexual advancements on him. He then showed this little rod a video of another famous producer engaging in sex acts with another man trying to convince him and say that, Hey, we're just going to do this one time so that you get used to this.
Cause this is what the music industry is about. It happens all the time. And then he promised little rod. He promised this producer that if he engaged in these sex acts, that he would then get producer of the year awards. Now, if you understand what Epstein was doing when he was blackmailing people, um, He was essentially taking them and giving them some sort of, you know, illegal, illicit drugs, activities, access to minors, and then using that blackmail against them in the future.
And this tells you exactly how, what, what is happening, exactly what is happening behind the curtain in the music industry, which is the fact that all of the hits on the radio that you hear are fake. That is not something that has been a grassroots musician getting put into this position because they make the best music.
No. No. It's the same thing with the movie industry. Hollywood. Right? By now you should know this. It's all fake. They're blackmailing people. So you remember, you ever hear the selling your soul to the devil, signing the contract with the devil to get what you want in life? That's what this is. That is the metaphor in action.
They are essentially conducting themselves in a way that they commit these types of acts, sometimes knowingly, sometimes not, like in the P. Diddy case, because P. Diddy had cameras all in every single room of his house recording all of the time. Then he would bring all these people over, have these freak off parties, bring in underage prostitutes, give those prostitutes alcohol, drug the people that he wanted to then go have sex with these prostitutes, videotape them doing it.
And now he has you. He's gotcha. Now, is it he, that's the question that should be asked too. Is he the one that is using this blackmail against people? No, it's the head of, I believe it's the universal studio or not universal studios. Um, the Sony, uh, music industry record label.
So it was the head of this record label that essentially put him into power to begin with. He took a 21, 22 year old P. Diddy, Puffy, Sean Diddy Combs, whatever frickin name he had at the time, and he created Bad Boy Records with him. He essentially put him into this position in power, embedded him into the industry, and then had him collect blackmail on these individuals, and only he was the gatekeeper.
He was the person who decided whether or not you passed go in the music industry, and the only way that you did that was by committing gay sex. and letting them essentially videotape it, or sex with a prostitute that was underage. And that's what this court document outlines. It's like 90 pages. Now, there's all sorts of horrific other things in there.
He shot his son's friend in the bathroom and watched him essentially bleed out. Uh, he, he beat the hell out of this woman in the middle of a hotel on camera. P. Diddy is the worst person that you can imagine. And it couldn't have happened to a better person now that he's in jail. Very happy to see this, but you have to understand that.
I think that's the takeaway from all of this is Epstein was not on his own. There is a Epstein in every major industry, whether it's finance, whether it's politics, whether it's music industry with P Diddy, whether it's Hollywood, they're all rigged. Every single one of them has a gatekeeper. And if you do not allow yourself to be blackmailed, you will not make it in the industry.
That's the way it works. Every major musician, the same record label that picked up Sean Diddy, Combs, P. Diddy, and put him in this position, that groomed Diddy to groom the entire industry to only allow certain types of, of rappers into the industry, also owns the contract of Taylor Swift. Also brought to power, and this goes back decades, Janis Joplin, Aerosmith, all of these major musicians were on this record label that was run by the single individual who had Diddy do all of this.
There's a gatekeeper in every industry. That is the takeaway here. Now what I wouldn't be surprised about is if what happened to Jeffrey Epstein very well may happen to Diddy. Diddy's probably going to get abstained. And the reason for that is because he has all of this blackmail and that man is going to chirp like a canary.
I think the adages sing, but he's going to chirp like a canary because I've heard him rap. He's not a very good singer, uh, but he's going to sing like a canary as soon as he gets in there and the very powerful people in, in those positions that he has blackmail on. Probably don't want him to do that, just like they didn't want Epstein to be able to talk about them, to get out of their sentencing.
That's the way it was. Now, if you recall, the person that kind of was the, the, his, his bodyguard was the one that was having all of this, uh, power and influence that had associations with, I think it was the Wharton school of business and all of these like very interesting potential three letter agency associations, uh, with these entities that are very closely tied to them.
So, Ding dong. Diddy's dead. Happy, happy that that happened. Couldn't have happened to a worse person. Very, very glad about it. All right. Now that leads us into our next topic, which is going to be about all about the alleged attempt, not alleged, the actual attempted assassination of Donald Trump. Now I went into a deep dive on this and I tried to do as much of my own, as much of my own digging as possible.
So I'll tell you the tools I used, how I did it, all of that. But I was able to find some very interesting things and I hit some dead ends that are even more interesting. And I'll talk about those. But first let's go ahead and hear exactly what happened. And then we will hear from Trump himself. And then we'll look into the history of this shooter.
All right. So, I do have somewhere on here a video where it explains what happened. Let's see.
Alright, and here is the Secret Service and FBI holding a press conference where they explain exactly what happened. Here we go.
According to the allegations in the complaint, a U. S. Secret Service agent walking the golf course perimeter saw what appeared to be a rifle poking out of the tree line. After the agent fired a service weapon in the direction of the rifle, a witness saw a man later identified as Ralph fleeing the area in the tree line.
Ralph was later apprehended by officers from the Martin County Sheriff's Office in coordination with the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. The complaint alleges that in the area of the tree line from which Ralph fled, Agents found a digital camera, a backpack, a loaded SKS style rifle with a scope, and a black plastic bag containing food.
The serial number on the rifle was obliterated. According to the complaint, Roth was convicted of felonies in North Carolina in December 2010. Now, the weapon is interesting because this is a SKS style, essentially a rifle, and you can't buy those. I mean, it's really not a common weapon in the U. S. Now, this man wasn't able to actually have a weapon in the U.
S. because he's had two felony charges, one for, uh, weapons of mass destruction, which we'll talk about in a few minutes here, but where did he get this rifle? It's a very common rifle in where he was embedding himself trying to recruit Afghani soldiers for the Ukraine war. So how did he get back to the U.
S. potentially with that rifle? It's an interesting question to ask. 2002 and March 2010 and therefore was prohibited from possessing a firearm. Right. The FBI is leading this investigation, this ongoing investigation. As the Attorney General stated earlier today, the FBI is continuing its investigation of this incident as an assassination attempt upon the former president.
The investigation So there you go. Essentially, Trump went to go golfing as a very spontaneous last minute golf outing, and somehow, this man was able to figure it out, fly here from Hawaii, and Not sure how that happened. And then post up for more than 12 hours cell phone data sets.
So there's a video that went around. that was talking about how the, I believe it was one of the, um, the sheriffs that were there or another individual that was involved in the case talking about how they had no idea. How did this man get access to know that he was going to be golfing on this golf course that day?
And then how did this man that was either generally embedded in Ukraine or Afghanistan and lived in Hawaii, get to this golf course in time to be there for 12 hours. And this person alleges that there had to have been a leak. This had to have been a conspiracy. He had to have been tipped off by somebody who was involved in the close proximity of Trump's campaign, where he would have actually known to be at this golf course on that day, because it was very last minute, very spontaneous golf trip.
And nobody knew about it other than his campaign staff. So how did this man know? Well, Hopefully, one day, we'll find out. Now, what's interesting about this too is that this is absolutely going to take the spotlight off of the first assassination attempt, which was absolutely atrociously handled by law enforcement and by the Secret Service.
Another interesting fact about it is that this man had a GoPro on himself during the time of committing this act. Who did he expect to watch this video? Why would you record yourself doing it?
So let's read up a little bit more about this after we hear Trump's response. And this happened just last night on the 16th. Here it is. I'm
relieved that you're here with us today after the second attempt, um, on your life at the Trump National Golf Club. It's just horrifying. Can you run us through what happened? So, uh, I was playing golf with Some of my friends, it was on a Sunday morning and very peaceful, very beautiful weather. Everything was beautiful.
Nice place to be. And all of a sudden we heard shots being fired in the air and I guess probably four or five. And it sounded like bullets, but what do I know about that? But Secret Service knew immediately it was bullets. And, uh, they grabbed me and, uh, I think probably the other one, Steve is one of the people, Steve Woodcuff, a great friend of mine, a great, uh, great businessman from mostly New York and Florida, great businessman.
And more importantly, just a fantastic person. So we're in the group. And, uh, everybody just, we got into the carts, and we moved along pretty, pretty good. Uh, I was with an agent, and the agent did a fantastic job. There was no question that we were, I would have loved to have sank that last putt. But, uh, we decided, let's get out of here.
And, what the, uh, gunfire was, actually, interestingly, was a, uh, Secret Service agent had seen a barrel of a AK 47, which is a very powerful gun. And, uh, he started shooting at the barrel and started shooting in the bushes. Well, could only see the barrel. How good is that? Right. But could only see the barrel based on that.
He started shooting and, uh, ran towards the target and was shooting a lot of, I mean, those were the shots we heard. The other one never got a shot off and he ran across the street and grabbed his car, hopped into his truck or car. And amazingly a civilian. In that area saw something and it looked very suspicious and in the car, drove their car to the back of his truck of some kind and took pictures of the license plate, gave them to the sheriff's office, Sheriff Bradshaw is fantastic, great, great sheriff for a long time and within a fairly short period of time they tracked him down on the highway, it was a pretty high speed chase and they ended up getting him, they got him.
Yeah. You wouldn't want to have somebody like that out there, you know, he dropped his gun, the AK 47, he left his gun, he left a cameras behind left a lot of things behind. So the agent did a fantastic job. The civilian did a phenomenal job, a woman. I mean, who would think you could take 1000 times like that?
How many people would have the brainpower to follow him and not many inches of the back of his truck so that they end up getting and the key was the license. So they got the license and After they had the license, you know, there's all sorts of technology where they can literally pinpoint where this truck is.
I never knew something like that existed. And, uh, they pinpointed him on the highway. They got him with a high speed chase. So, they got him. It was amazing. So, Secret Service did a great job. And I think, I can say honestly, the Sheriff's Office, law enforcement, everybody really did a great job.
So, right from his mouth, that's what happened. And again, it goes back to the question, how did this man know that he was going to be on that golf course? It was a spontaneous trip. There's no reason that this, that he should have been able to be tipped off about this, unless it was somebody in Trump's campaign.
or the secret service or somebody doing security for him. But how would you even get to this individual? So this is where let's bring up. Who was Ryan Routh? Who was this man? It's a very, very interesting case. And we have a bunch of different articles here that we'll look at that talk about who he is.
We'll look at all the news articles that he's been speaking or he's actually been seen in the news. talking to the news companies about the Ukraine war. So he's a very, very active recruiter, a mercenary recruiter for the Ukrainian war. Now, how does one go back and forth between here in Ukraine, into Afghanistan, do a bunch of news talks and not be known by the FBI.
This man had to have been on their radar. He was in an Azov commercial, which is the special forces arm of essentially of Ukraine. The same one that was accused of being a extension of the Nazi party, essentially. He was in their commercial.
So let's look at this timeline that discusses exactly who he is and where he's been seen and what we know about him. Alright, this article just gives a bunch, a bunch of sources. Uh, it says,
A source with direct knowledge of the investigation confirmed to The Guardian that the suspect in Sunday's case is 58 year old Ryan Wesley Routh, though law enforcement has not officially named him, which they have now, and was no immediate indication of a motive. The son of the man accused of trying to assassinate Donald Trump at his Florida golf course Sunday night.
Said his father had traveled to Ukraine and volunteered to provide the son, what the son described as humanitarian aid to troops defending the country from Russian forces that invaded in 2022, which is not the case. This man was there to recruit foreign soldiers to the Ukrainian war saying that he had NATO trained soldiers ready to fight thousands of them.
How does a foreign mercenary recruiting for Ukraine in commercials for the Azov battalion not be on the radar of the FBI? Especially when this man went on long, long, long tangents all day every day on social media talking about his motives for doing so. It says he just so happened to be filmed in 2022 by Newsweek about his effort to recruit mercenaries to fight in Ukraine.
So we'll look at that. And then the New York times even wrote a profile on Ryan Roth back in 2023. So let's look at some of these articles where it talks about him. The first being that the son of the suspect talks out about the assassination attempt. And then in this, in this interview, he essentially says that he hated Trump.
It says the son of the man accused talks about, uh, assassinating Donald Trump at his Florida golf course on Sunday, said his father had traveled to Ukraine and volunteered to provide the son what the son described as humanitarian aid to troops. Uh, now there's a video here that we can watch where he's actually talking about this.
And this man has half blue hair and a U. S. flag t shirt on.
Ukrainians and the rest of the world are caring and kind and, and generous and, and unselfish and, and take care of one another. And it's just a matter of, you know, we need to stand up for that. That is the most important thing in the world. You know, when you talk to a 20 year old guy that sold everything he owns to come here and fight, that is heroism.
You know, he's coming here to risk his life. for humanity, for the Ukrainians, you know, guys that sell everything they own to come here and support the Ukrainians while others sit at home and, and, and do nothing. Hmm. And that was the Guardian. There's an extension of that, uh, video that we'll watch here as well, but here's an actual video.
I haven't seen this one yet. Body cam footage footage showing the arrest of the shooter. Let's watch that real quick. Driver, take two steps to your right.
Take two steps to your right driver, and they're sitting here. There's three officers, four officers, five officers, six officers in view, sheriff's telling him to get out of his vehicle. This man now has his shirt over his head and he's getting taken to the ground.
Should have tripped a leg. Just at least a nice take down. Uh. Okay, so let's, let's see if we can find the next video, uh, the extension of that video where he continues to talk. And here it is.
Who you are and why are you here? Uh, I'm 56 from the U. S., U. S., uh, from North Carolina originally. So I live in Hawaii now. So I flew all the way from Hawaii here. So the question as far as why I'm here. to me. You know, a lot of the other conflicts are gray, but this conflict is definitely black and white.
This is about good versus evil. This is a storybook. You know, any movie we've ever watched this is definitely evil against good. I mean, we're battling a situation here where, you know, the Ukrainians and the rest of the world are caring and kind and, and generous and, and unselfish and, and take care of one another.
And it's just a matter of. You know, we need to stand up for that. That is the most important thing in the world is just to show human beings that we're kind and we're caring and that we take care of one another and that the world is united so that we feed each other and make sure that, you know, we all move forward as as one collective whole unit.
So, you know, we feel the pain of one country's failure and their conflicts and we enjoy the successes of other countries that are doing good and we all work together and for some reason. Russia does not grasp this concept that we're, we're all one unit and we have to get along and work together and, and, and, and be normal human beings.
This is 2022. We have to work together. It's, it's, it seems asinine that we have a leader in a country that does not understand the concept of, of being unselfish and being generous. Thank you very much. And being kind and just the basic moral values that are required by human beings these days. It blows my mind.
Now I want to listen to that video. Tell me who you are and why are you here? Uh, I'm 56 from the U. S., U. S., uh, from North Carolina, originally. Still live in Hawaii now, so flew all the way. I just wanted to hear him pronounce his own name, uh, but he didn't do that. Okay. So, uh, essentially this man has been in several, several news stations all over the world.
He's been seen in written about in the New York times. He's been on news week. He's been plastered all over as a recruiter for, for mercenary teams. And you're trying to tell me this man was not, no radar. Has no ties to the FBI has no ties to the CIA has has not been on any list anywhere. This man.
Absolutely has been tracked.
And here's yet another article by the newindian. in, which the title to this article is U. S. Mercenary Plans to Recruit Pakistani Based Afghan Refugees as Fighters in Ukraine. Now who is that mercenary? Well you read on in the article here, and that's the same individual, the same person who tried to kill Trump.
So when we start looking through more and more of these articles, one thing that comes up is that there's actually a website that he ran recruiting foreign fighters and it says attempted Trump assassination or assassin. Ryan Ruth ran a Ukrainian foreign fighter recruitment website where he offered 1, 200 per month.
To Afghani soldiers to fight in the Ukraine war from all over the world on this site. He had advocated for nuking Russia, stealing bombs and weapons from other countries to give Ukraine. He seems to have been totally radicalized by the media. This says in the left in recent years, his writings are filled with lunatic MSNBC style takes on the Ukrainian war.
His social media shows he was also a big fan of many Democrat politicians. Here's the recruitment website. Now I also understand that I think he actually voted for Donald Trump in 2016. Um, and then he actually wanted to push for it. So, so the assassin that tried to kill Donald Trump actually wanted a Vivek and Nikki Haley ticket, which he posted on his Instagram, crying to Vivek, asking him to jump on the ticket with Nikki Haley as the presidential candidate.
Now, why would some warmongering Democrat Wanting to expand the war in Ukraine and how much we're offering them in terms of Access to supplies and soldiers. Why would that want a Nikki Haley ticket? Hmm. I wonder if she's maybe the biggest war hawk that was on on the presidential Candidacy, so let's look at this website This website is FightForUkraine.
com. ua and it says military recruitment. It's a terrible website, by the way. Um, military recruitment. Pay 1200 USD per month for all ages, genders, and skill levels to none. Ukrainian Army wishes and hopes to pay every person helping in the fight for freedom and human rights, but the country is struggling and funds and support dwindling.
So our expectations must be realistic, and what we each must give will be far beyond normal sacrifice. But it is what we all must do. Each one of us is responsible for the outcome of this war, as our every single action must stand for humanity and show kindness, caring, selflessness, altruism, empathy, generosity, and all of the moral goodness that this battle is about.
Volunteering in Ukraine is the most honorable and noble sacrifice. And every human on the planet should be here for freedom and human rights, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Uh, fighters do not waste time in the embassy of your country. Just come with gear and food and money. Expect nothing. Everyone must slowly be vetted and you must prove loyalty.
Now there's actually a way that he tells them how to basically traffic themselves into Ukraine. And here's what it says. You do not need a visa. Simply get all military gear and money and fly to Krakow. Take an intercity train or bus to this bus station. Take a local train or bus to here. Make your way to the border with Ukraine.
Tell the border guard you want to join the International Legion, and they will take you to the office and meet with Nazar and the leaders. Now I wonder who Nazar is. If you do not have military experience, you must sell yourself that you are capable. They will run your passport and go through your phone and make sure you are not Russian.
If accepted, you go directly to a nearby base and train. There is a tent located alongside the sidewalk to the border for the Foreign Legion. It is very casual. You can sell yourself there to be shipped to the base in Western Ukraine. If all of the above fails, cross the border to Ukraine, take a bus to the border town, Lviv, get a train to Kiev, get in touch with me.
We can call and visit countless units in need of help. We have unlimited places to fight and help, so please do not hesitate. Insights from the fighters. I like how we use this like a, uh, Customer review style. Uh, I was injured in the car accident and many people have been seriously killed or hurt just in transit from bad driving.
So be careful who you ride with. Like, okay, do not expect anything to be given to you. You will need to come with everything you need or you may, you may need or buy it here. Anything you are lucky to get given as a bonus and whatever food you can bring is smart as well. Yeah. It doesn't sound like what, I don't know.
I want to ship myself for And here is his face on this recruitment website. And it has his email, his Facebook, his Twitter, his phone number, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, Viber. I want to see if this is a, uh, let's see, is this a link tree? Oh, it goes to his WhatsApp. Well, I'm definitely going to be on some list somewhere.
No. Uh, Here it is. So there's his literal mercenary recruitment website. The assassin of Donald Trump had a mercenary recruitment website for Ukrainian fighters. Now, who he was trying to get to come over were Afghani soldiers that he was trying to convince to do this. Now, there is a whole, uh, let's see, there's a whole recording of every one of the tweets he ever made.
That is up on Twitter right now that I looked through and that's where I saw the Vivek and Nikki Haley ticket situation. Now here's a video of him, uh, talking about it. To be cooperative. That's Ryan Ruth, a U. S. citizen who set up the International Volunteer Center in Ukraine to help connect foreigners to Ukrainian military units.
Now I'm talking to over 100 soldiers every day and pretty much everybody, all of my contacts in Ukraine, they were adamant and pretty much yelled at me every time that I suggested that we bring in Afghans. The Ukrainian government didn't respond to our request for comment. Ukraine is reluctant to. There you go.
So another news outlet that had this man on camera, how does he have all of this, all of these connections? How does he have all these ties? How is he able to get to Ukraine? Know who to send these people to? Sounds a little fishy to me. And as we move through some more of these articles, he is found in this as of battalion ad campaign.
And here is that.
There he is. Now, some people were saying this is a BlackRock ad. No, it's not. It's an Azov Battalion ad. Just a Nazi ad.
And then, there's more and more articles with his name on it. One being the New York Times. And if we search his name here, You'll see, with Legion growth stalling, Ryan Routh, a former construction worker from Greensboro, North Carolina, is seeking recruits from among Afghan soldiers who fled the Taliban.
Mr. Routh is, who spent several months in Ukraine last year, said he planned to move them, in some cases illegally, from Pakistan to Iran to Ukraine. So if the New York Times is writing about this person, if he's in an Azov battalion campaign, ad campaign. There's no way this man's cell phone was not being monitored.
There's no way this man didn't have ties to the CIA. There's no way they weren't on his radar at the very least to where they would be monitoring him. No way if this mercenary recruiter in Ukraine from the United States wasn't on their radar, wasn't being monitored, and didn't have some ties to people who may want to monitor him.
alert this potential asset to go do a specific task at a specific time at a specific place when the opportunity arose. This one is absolutely clear cut to me. There's no way this man didn't have associations with three letter agencies or at least weren't on their radar to where he would have been stopped.
But again, we go back to the fact that this had to have been leaked. Somebody knew about this and told this man where to go and when in this last minute golf outing. We can probably purchase some passports through Pakistan since it's such a corrupt country, he said in an interview with Washington. It is not clear whether he has succeeded, but one former Afghan soldier said he had been contacted and was interested in fighting if it meant leaving Iran, where he was living illegally.
So, the New York Times was writing about him, and this was in, let's see, this was written March 25th. 2023. So just last year, uh, here is a picture of his blue house in Hawaii. You can't make this stuff up. Uh, his blue house in Hawaii with a Biden Harris sticker on his truck. Very interesting. Now here's a, a conspiratorial thought coming from, uh, a Russian.
Account, I believe this person is some sort of Diplomat, excuse me. It's 6 a. m. Here The deputy chair of the Security Council of the Russian Federation All right And he said I wonder what would happen if it turned out that the failed new Trump shooter Routh Who recruited mercenaries for the Ukrainian army was himself?
Hired by the neo nazi regime in Kiev for this assassination attempt. Now that's another interesting theory, right? Maybe it wasn't the CIA. Maybe it wasn't BlackRock or Vanguard. Maybe it was the entity that is in a foreign war where if he gets into office, they may not get the funding they need. Maybe it was Zelensky that called this man who they knew had ties.
How many United States individuals are over there recruiting mercenaries for that?
How many are there? 5, 10, 20, 1? And why aren't we considering the fact that it could have been the Azov Battalion, it could have been the Ukrainian Army, it could have been Zelensky himself that called this man, told him where to be with military intelligence, and told him what to do so that the cash cow could keep producing supplies, producing soldiers, producing more and more money to Ukraine so that they continue to fight this proxy war on behalf of the United States.
That's an interesting theory that I don't think anybody's really considering. So is it Ukraine wanting to continue their war? Is it somebody from Israel wanting to continue their war? Because they know if Trump gets in office, he is not pro war the same way that Kamala will be. He cannot be bought off the same way that Kamala can be.
He is not a puppet for the powers that be the way that Kamala is. So there's only one way to get rid of Trump on this ticket and this assassination. I do not believe this is going to be the last attempt on his life before the election. And I do not believe that the assassinations will stop. The assassination attempts will stop even when he gets in office.
I don't believe that. There's no reason to. They're trying to stop him from being in office. Not trying to stop him from being elected. It's trying to stop him from being the president. So these assassination attempts will continue. Especially now that the floodgates have opened. Not one, but two now.
Looking through the comments here of what was said underneath that. Now some more information about here. Let's do a rapid fire round. Some more information here about this man. Is that he has a long standing criminal record. Long standing criminal record. Let me go ahead and change this over here. Um, everything from petty traffic stops.
Many, many times he had his license revoked. Um, but here is a long list. So everybody has these screenshots. I went to the source. This is the North Carolina Judicial Branch e courts portal website where you can see every one of his criminal cases dating back to 2001.
And if we go look into some of these cases, the one that was most interesting to everybody involved weapons of mass destruction. Now, everybody was curious about this. You couldn't seem to find any information about this.
And it doesn't say anything in the court records. You actually have to pull the full court file. So I went to pull the whole court file. And you can do this only through one software, one platform, and it's called PACER, and it's what lawyers use to be able to pull legal files. It's what people can use in their own legal cases to pull these.
It's essentially a government database where you can pull all of the, the files for, for publicly available court cases. Now when I went to PACER, made an account, signed into that account, searched several other legal cases, I had no issues. Now, I took this case, the one here about possession of a weapon of mass destruction from 4 29 of 2002, and asked it to pull the full file of that case.
Immediately when I did that, I was logged out of my account. My account was turned inactive, and I cannot get a hold of anybody at PACER to be able to access these files. I stayed on hold for an hour and a half yesterday trying to get on the phone with somebody. And every time they picked up, they hung up on me.
Now I don't think that part's as fishy as the fact that it automatically logged me out, deactivated my account. As soon as I searched for these files, there's absolutely a coverup happening and I might be, I, I, I, I commend you. I don't commend you. I. I highly encourage you to go to PACER, the PACER website, which is pacer.
psc. uscourts. gov. Right? pacer. psc. uscourts. gov. And you can go here and search for a case, create an account, and I'll even show you that my account won't work. But you can create an account and search a specific court case. Now the court case that you're going to look up is going to be Ryan Routh vs. the state of North Carolina.
When you search that, you will be immediately logged out, your account will be deactivated, and you will not be able to log in or search for any more court cases. Now I will show you exactly what I'm talking about here.
So if I go to log into PACER, again, the only governmental database where you can access these types of documents, I was going to pull the full court file because nobody was finding information out about this man's case. It says, Although you have a PACER account, your account is inactive. If you have questions or further details on how to activate your search privileges, contact PACER Service Center at 800 676 6856 between these hours.
You may continue to log in and perform other activities, e file, request filing privileges, but you will not have PACER search privileges. Now when I continue, it won't even let me logged in. There's currently an issue with your Pacer account. For additional information, contact the Pacer Service Center at 800 676 6856.
It won't even let me log in. They won't pick up the phone. They answer why. And this happened immediately as I pressed the enter button to look up and pull that court case. Now I was able to find one single article that talks about what happened back in 2002
and here it is. This is from greensboro. com man with gun. And I don't think anybody really, there's been a couple of times I've seen this article referenced. Most people haven't seen this article. It was very, very difficult to find. Man with gun barricades himself inside business says an armed man was arrested Monday morning after barricading himself in a business during a three hour standoff with police.
Now I would like you to note that this was updated in January 24th of 2015. Interesting. Uh, Ryan Routh, 36, was arrested without incident at 1 a. m. Monday at United Roofing, 1735 West Lee Street, Greensboro Police said. Routh was pulled over at about 10 p. m. Sunday during a traffic stop, police said, but he put his hand on his firearm and drove to United Roofing where he remained barricaded inside.
Ralph was charged with carrying a concealed weapon in possession of a weapon of mass destruction. Now, everybody was like a weapon of mass destruction. Did he have a nuke? Did he have a chemicals? What was it? That that was this weapon of mass destruction. This is the only place that you can find it. After I tried to pull those court documents, a fully automatic weapon.
So nothing too, too crazy there. Again, how did he get that weapon? What was he doing with that weapon? All good questions. He was also charged with resisting, delaying, and obstructing a law enforcement officer and driving while his license was revoked. So there you have it. Now, when you do some searches on Ryan Routh, you can find his emails, his addresses, his phone numbers.
And one of the emails that I found of his leads back to him, a company.
And I'll show you how I found this here, but a company called icom design.com. Now what's interesting about this is this is a Greensboro number and when you look up Icom design, 'cause this is all it is, it was allegedly a website building company back in 2002 to 2004. Um, but there's no information on it.
It's been updated to show a copyright of 2024. There's an email that you can click. And if you look on LinkedIn, there's a few individuals who are associated with ICOM Design. This is one of them. Ananda Rose Benet. Interesting. Greensboro, North Carolina. An intern at ICOMdesign. com. With a pretty recent picture with pink and blue hair.
Ananda Rose Benet. And it says she's a web designer, dah, dah, dah, dah, an intern at ICOM Design back in 2012 and has worked there for 11 years. Probably not, this might just be an old, nobody's going to be an intern for 11 years. Um, but when you also look up more people who were a part of this ICOM Design, which is where I found, uh, an email that was associated with him, so I'll show you that.
So there's a website that you can go to and use.
And it will show you addresses, phone numbers, associates, family members, job history, all of it. So you can verify this information yourself. Look at his addresses, um, phone numbers that he's associated with. This three, three, six area code is a Greensboro area code. You can see. Oh, this is his wife, Laura Routh.
Sorry, I was doing some more digging here, but let's look up Ryan.
So his current address is Hawaii. Hers is North Carolina, which is interesting as well, but Previous addresses, but here's his website. Now you can see United roofing was a roofing company. He owned you can see GSO skate park at yahoo. com and that was basically his son 10 years ago or so was trying to create a skate park in local Greensboro area without a permit and it became this big news article thing and he was trying to raise money for it and he did with some oil company also sketchy.
GSO skate park at yahoo. com that he was trying to get people to send funds to. Um, I can validate that for you in several different ways. Um, here I'll show you where I found that just so you can see it. Uh,
here we go. Where's the article?
That's the barricade article. That's not what we're looking for. Um, oh. That got pulled. That's interesting. I just looked at that article yesterday and now it is scrubbed, scrubbed from the internet. That's interesting. Um, so you can validate that by the skate park. Let's see if I'll just look it up for you.
Here's the article where you can see a skateboard park. Skateboard park closed. Skate park violates zoning laws. And you can see that Ryan Routh was mentioned several times throughout this article because his son was one of the founders of this skate park. Here it is. Ryan Routh says he brought in the structural design engineer.
Here's his what his company United Roofing Co. Talked about how they were gonna charge some money so that they could put up a porta potty and all this stuff. All right. So just to show you that what we're looking at is true here. Even the GSO skate park at yahoo. com was accurate, which I was like, no way.
This guy's associated with, you know, a skate park. That makes no sense. But then I found the articles and there it is. And that tells you how far I've been digging into this personally. Um, you probably won't hear about that on any other channel or individual. Um, but that led me to Matt at ICOM design. com.
Now, why would he go by Matt is one question. But ICOMdesign. com, then you go to ICOMdesign. com. And this is the website that you're met with. It's a front website. It doesn't make any sense. There's a phone number, which I have yet to call. And if you want to do that and let me know how it goes, let me know.
336 854 8500. Click to email. This is it. Then you can take that and you go to LinkedIn and see who's associated with ICOMdesign. com. All right. There's five individuals who are listed under that.
Let's see if we can pull up the icomdesign. com people.
Let's go back. And there was three of them that were opera singers and in Hawaii.
So icomdesign. com, Matt at icomdesign. com is a front website that has employees in both states where he lives and operates. And several of them are opera singers. Now I would have thought the opera singers would have been a different entity altogether, but the fact that they live on the exact island
that he lived in makes the association make sense. It doesn't make it make sense, but it validates it. Right? So if you go to, maybe not icomdesign. com, Well, let's go to ICOM design and we look up who are the employees. It's not showing it anymore. It won't even try to let me access her. But if we go back, I was able to find, get access to those individuals by going around it the same way that I was, I got to her.
Um, so let's see LinkedIn, but anyways, that was what I found on that front is that yeah. The people that were working at this ICOM Designs were located in both states that he operates out of, Hawaii and North Carolina, and there's only a front website here, and his name is associated with this mat at ICOMdesign.
com. Not sure where that's going to lead us, but we'll continue diving down that hole. It's very interesting. Now back to the case here, possession of weapons of mass destruction, right? I tried to follow that, hold on as many strings as I could until I hit a dead end where they locked me out of my account and wouldn't give me any more information.
Um, found this article. Now let's see what else we have here. Um, he even had this soldier's passport and birth certificate. Uh, In his posts on LinkedIn. So his LinkedIn was still up when I looked yesterday. I'm not sure if it will be today. Let's look.
It's going to be pulled. I bet it is because his picture's gone now.
Let's see. Oh, there it is. Okay. So here's his LinkedIn 10 connections would be really interesting to see who those 10 people are. Now, sometimes you can look over here and it will recommend people who are associated with them. It just won't tell you, right? It's not going to tell you who their connections are, but it shows that he was, uh, the owner of Campbox Honolulu for the last six years, they've made essentially one building the entire time.
So where's this man getting his money from to make all these flights from here and back, uh, with no history whatsoever of any success in any business that he's had ever.
And then you can look at what were some of his comments. What has he posted, what has he discussed, right? Go to activity, show all activity.
And you'll see some of his posts. Here's one of them that has a bunch of people commenting on it now. 144 comments. And then there was another one, if you go under comments, where he had this. person was, uh, some sort of recruiter, um, onsite hiring. And then this man, Carl Hugely commented on this and said, um, details.
Now that man's sense has removed his comments since yesterday. I have your passport and birth certificate here in Hawaii. Call me 808 379 9411. And it's this Carlton Hughley. Okay. So there's the comment. He said the interested, and he probably searched this man's name, tried to tell him I have it. Why would you have somebody's passport and birth certificate?
That's pretty crazy situation to find yourself in. Uh, so that's his really, his only comment on LinkedIn. So I will continue digging into this and seeing how many dead ends I hit. But there's a lot of strings to pull on here, guys. A lot of strings to pull on here. Now I'm going to look through. I created a notes situation on this, um, so that I could track everything that we looked at.
But, um, but anyways, there's your breakdown. There's the situation. I will continue to do a deep dive on this. Hopefully more information comes out. This one is so sketchy. So sketchy. Like I said, there's absolutely zero chance that this man has all these ties, all these associations, all these news network interviews was in an as off battalion advertising campaign was being interviewed by the New York times by newsweek was a recruiter, a mercenary recruiter in Ukraine going back and forth constantly and somehow managed to evade the radar of the CIA and the FBI.
And I do think that the idea is very interesting that this man was potentially put up to this by his association and his allegiance to, because you listed that to that video, he has a strong belief in what is happening in Ukraine, or at least he pretends to.
So if he was asked or tasked to do this by Ukraine, because they want to stop Trump from getting an office because they know that The money train will stop when Trump goes in office. It's an interesting theory, but I'm sure there's many mothers that are just as crazy, if not crazier, that could also be true.
So subscribe, leave a five star review, head over to ronanbasics. com and until next time, thank you for listening.
-
Welcome to The Adams Archive, the podcast where we dig deep into the stories behind the headlines—uncovering political manipulation, media tricks, and societal shifts shaping our world. Hosted by Austin Adams, this show isn’t afraid to tackle the hard topics, exposing truths that mainstream media glosses over. From Big Tech's influence on politics to government surveillance and celebrity psy-ops, we take you behind the curtain of today’s most pressing issues.
In this episode, we confront the heartbreaking reality of the Georgia school shooting—a tragic event that left four people dead. We discuss the broader issues surrounding gun control, mental health, and what could be done to prevent future tragedies. Then, we move to an equally alarming revelation: Amazon’s Alexa caught manipulating political responses, providing biased answers about Trump and Kamala Harris. What does this tell us about Big Tech’s role in influencing elections, and how can we hold these companies accountable?
Finally, we dive into the world of celebrity PR with the latest on Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce. Could their relationship be nothing more than a staged PR stunt? We examine leaked documents that suggest it might be and how it ties into a broader narrative of media manipulation for profit and influence.
Each segment connects, revealing how tragedies and manipulation intertwine in today’s world, affecting everything from public perception to personal privacy.
If you’re ready to dig deeper into the issues that really matter, don’t forget to subscribe to The Adams Archive! Join us on YouTube, Substack, and social media for more deep dives and critical conversations. Leave a 5-star review and share the show with others who want to uncover the truth.
All the Links: For easy access to episodes, social platforms, and more, visit https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams.
----more----
Full Transcription
Atoms Archive. Hello, you beautiful people, and welcome to The Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we're going to start off by talking about what some people are posting online showing the bias of Amazon. Amazon Alexa, the, the echoes, the dots, the, whatever the hell, other things they have out there.
People have been asking her questions. Why should I vote for Donald Trump? And then they asked the same question about Kamala Harris and they get two completely different answers. And we'll talk about that first. We even have the response from Amazon. Then we'll take a look at Tim Wall's entire family, his entire family endorsing Donald Trump, which is absolutely hilarious.
Following some of the other endorsements that we've had recently as following that we months ago, talked about months ago, almost coming up on a year now. Talked about how the potential of Taylor Swift to be a CIA asset and also the potential that her relationship with Travis Kelsey was entirely fake.
Now, some people are speculating that that may be true now after PR documents come out showing their alleged plan breakup and all of the details surrounding it. So we'll watch. The video on that and read some of the documents there. Following that, we'll take a look at a presentation, a pitch deck from a company called CMG and for a very long time, many people have talked about, Oh, they're listening to you through your microphones.
And everybody would say, no, that's ridiculous. It's just add data. You sent a message that like, I'll explain all of it, but essentially the idea here is that they're going to start utilizing the microphones in your home and on your phone to be able to start advertising to you. And obviously much, much worse than that.
Right. I've talked about this previously. I believe this is a real possibility and now we actually have proof that a company is offering this as a service. Following that we will talk about the school shooting yesterday in Georgia. Absolutely terrible, terrible, horrific situation. A 14 year old nonetheless.
It's unbelievable. So we'll talk about that, the situation itself. Can even listen into some of the parents that were there at the time. And that will lead us to our last topic of the day, which is that the Tennessee Star finally released the manifesto, kind of a manifesto, not really, it was kind of a dud, it was kind of weird but 90 pages of Audrey Hale, I believe she was the school shooter.
in Nashville, Tennessee, a little bit over a year ago now. So we'll look through that together, get you the cliff notes all of that more stick around, but first hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review and head over to RonanBasics. com. Get yourself a Faraday tinfoil basically blocks the EMS from reaching your most important asset.
We all know all of these things around me right now emit EMS radiations and those things have terrible negative side effects, both on your body as a whole, shown very high increases in cancer rates in certain studies, happy to provide those, A lot of people have been talking about this recently, and I'm very happy to see it.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Andrew Huberman, Tim Ferriss, you, all of the top individuals who are out there, like either in the podcast space or in the health space are talking about this now. And I'm excited to see that there's finally some, some information and knowledge coming out and that there's going to hopefully start to be some funding around the actual scientific studies of this.
So head over to RonanBasics. com. We have our tinfoil Faraday hats. We also have our RFID blocking wallets and very, very well. We also have beanies to a tinfoil beanies that block your block your head from the cold and the EMS. So head over there, Ronan basics. com without further ado, let's jump into it.
The Adams archive.
All right, let's go ahead and jump into it. Amazon comes out and defends its Alexa's biased answers on Trump and Harris. Let's try that again. Amazon defends Alexa's biased, its biased answers on Trump and Harris as an error. So all of these videos came out yesterday, showing people asking Amazon's Alexa saying, Hey, Amazon, why should I vote for Donald Trump?
And Amazon would say something like this. It would say, I cannot provide information about why you should vote for a certain political opponent. Didn't say opponent, but certain politicians. It's like, okay, that's fair. That's fair. You shouldn't have to give opinions on politics. You are a programmed robot that doesn't have its own opinions.
You only have the opinions of the people that own you and you. Programmed you. We know that no reason that there should, that this thing should have an opinion, but when it's asked the opposite question, why should I vote for Kamala Harris? It gave a very detailed explanation as to why. Well, because you align with her policies and she's a powerful woman and all of these great, amazing things about Kamala Harris.
Many people were posting this same video. Now, Amazon was quick to patch this, but it didn't stop you from seeing behind the curtain. Here's. The video that went viral.
Let's see. Not that. There we go. All right, here we go. This was posted on September 3rd, just two days ago. Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump? I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party or a specific candidate. Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?
While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris, the most significant reason is that she is a strong candidate with a proven track record of accomplishment. As the first female vice president, Harris has already broken down a major gender barrier, and her career in politics has been characterized by a commitment to progressive ideals and a focus on helping disenfranchised communities.
Wow. So there you go. And we know this, right? We talked about Amazon's top 100 hats last week. We've seen it with the airplane AI editing. We've seen it with them trying to show more people in the audience than were actually there. Like all of the tricks are being pulled. Now, I find this to be really interesting, mostly from like a marketing perspective.
We are going to see. We are going to see in real time how capable the propaganda machine is because if they can make Kamala Harris popular after her getting less than 1 percent of the popular vote from her own party last election, then I'm fairly sure. That they can make anybody popular. And I think that's what we're seeing.
They're going to pull out all the stops, whether it's Amazon, Alexa, whether it's the, you know, all of the things that I've listed, the AI photos, the fake phone calls with Joe Biden, the, all of these things are in an effort to market her as somebody who is not just like a bull, but somebody who is liked.
And the reason that they want, they don't want you to have to like her. None of this is meant to make you actually like her. It's to give the appearance that she has liked. Because if you give the appearance that she's liked, and then she wins, you won't question why. So it's not, they're spending hundreds of millions of dollars, not on making you like Kamala Harris, they're spending hundreds of millions of dollars to convince you that some people do like Kamala Harris, and not just some people, but half or majority of the country, because when they go into the election, They need you to believe the data that is provided to you.
And if everybody knows that she is hated, if she's not on every news channel, if she's not singing with Beyonce on stage, if she's not crowded by people that are AI generated outside the tarmac of her getting off of her plane, if she's not loved by Amazon Alexa, then it's unconvincing. But they have to convince you.
That's the whole point of this, right? They're not going to, they're not going to convince half the country to like Kamala Harris. They're not going to convince half the country to vote for Kamala Harris. But if they can convince you that enough people are that, that, that, that, that do like her, the facade, right?
Then the smoke and mirrors work because they can do whatever they want to rig the election. They can do whatever they want to make it appear as if she won. But what they can't do is convince you. Without a huge marketing budget that it was legitimate, which is all they're trying to do with this. So keep that in mind when you're watching all of this, right?
All of these advertisements seem terrible because the point of it is not to convince you. They know they can't convince you. They can't convince half the country to vote for her, but they can convince you that half the country did vote for her and then muddy the data. Right? I heard this talked about yesterday with the exit polls.
The problem now with, with the validation of the voting systems is that the exit polls are no longer accurate. Which used to be the, the, the number one way to validate the validity of the, of the vote counts. If you walk out of a, a voting booth and they all of a sudden go, Hey, who'd you vote for? Then we know exactly who you voted for.
Right? We should know that that data should at least somewhat match what happened at the polls in that location. But now there's mail in ballots,
which messes everything up because now they can just say that, Oh, there was 20, 000 mail in ballots that came in at the right at 1159 at night. And you didn't get a chance to pull them. So we don't know. Of course it's valid. Don't, don't question me. Of course it's valid. Amazon Alexa even loves Kamala Harris.
It's atrocious. It's crazy. It says the inconsistency was highlighted by users posting videos of Alexa's responses. For Donald Trump, the former president, Alexa, asserted its inability to furnish content promoting a specific political entity. Curiously though, when asked about voting for Kamala Harris, Alexa articulated a catalog of reasons to vote for her, the Democratic candidate in November's presidential election.
This included the significant point that Harris is a strong candidate with a proven track record of accomplishments. Acknowledging these inconsistencies, Amazon swiftly declared it an error and claimed to have it fixed. This was an error that we fixed quickly, an Amazon spokesperson said in a statement.
Why not just say that? Why do we have to say that twice? This situation draws parallels to previous controversy involving Google's search engine. Yeah! They completely eliminated Donald Trump even from his own assassination video. Own assassination Google search, right? Like, it was unbelievable to see the lengths that they're trying to go to, to try to manipulate this election.
And this should be like, this, this is election interference by the way. Right? This is big tech trying to sway the needle 5, 10, 20%. Even 1 percent is huge, especially in the swing states, right? They know that. So, interesting. Now, what we'll move to, speaking of elections, is that the entire family of Tim Walz endorsed Donald Trump.
The entire family! Now, I don't know what kind of person you have to be for your entire family to betray you in the biggest moment of your life when you're running for president. Vice president of a country. I would hope even if my family didn't. Align didn't align with my political beliefs. If I ran for office, they would at least respect me enough to shut up.
Like you have to be very unliked, very unliked. And it all started with this picture right here. I'll zoom in on that for you. If you're on YouTube it all started with this, this picture right here. Trump 2024, take America back. And this is all Tim Walz family. It says Nebraska. It says, Walls for Trump, W A L Z S.
How funny. Nebraska Walls for Trump. How terrible of a person do you have to be to have your entire family betray you in the biggest moment of your life? How bad of a person do you have to be?
I couldn't imagine my family betraying me this way. You saw it with Robert F. Kennedy. That was pretty crazy. Right? So if we, if we, let's, let's be fair here. Let's, let's draw some common ground. If we draw a parallel between Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his family saying we don't endorse Donald Trump. We don't agree with what he did.
Here is our statement. Here is a letter. Right? That's one thing I guess. And they're absolutely endorsing Kamala Harris. You know that. But they wrote a letter. This family went outside. Not only. They had shirts created for this specific reason. You have to think, somebody designed this shirt, somebody sent it to a printer, they all put it on, went outside, found a camera, got a cameraman, and then betrayed their family member.
That is wild. Now this comes off the situation where Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has now endorsed Donald Trump. Tulsi Gabbard has now endorsed Donald Trump. And now Tim's Walls, Tim Walls entire family has now endorsed Donald Trump. This is like, I don't think there could be a worse situation for them, right? The two most popular Democrats, as well as Tim Walls, entire family.
Now I seem to think, right, I've, I've heard some, I think David, I can't think of the name right now, but anyways, somebody talked about in a podcast how he didn't seem it was a Tucker, Tucker Carlson interview, and I'll remember the name because I love it this guy, I've talked about him before, Dave Smith, thank you a memory Dave Smith talked about how he doesn't believe exactly that Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. endorsing Donald Trump is going to exactly mean more votes, and I tend to agree with him, I don't think that the endorsement of another candidate completely equals the voting for by, a certain group of people that follow one person. I don't think it's transferable is what was his quote.
Now, I agree with that, but I've heard people that were strict Democrats their whole life, like one of the most Democrat people I know, decided since hearing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 's speech that they were going to vote for Donald Trump. And when you, like, if you knew what I knew about this person. You would know that this in any universe was never something that you would have expected.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 's speech was so powerful that it did hold weight with people, and it did resonate with people, and it did show them the corruption, and it did show them why maybe you should consider your position fully when you understand the consequences. And so, I guess, Endorsements do work. I, I literally would have not expected that at all.
I now actually know that they do, at least if they worked for this person, I know it's going to work for a lot of other people. So I wonder how much this is making people question it. And I wonder if anybody actually verified that this is actually his family. I mean, this seems to be, A pretty consistent story, but look at that.
His brothers, his sisters, his nephews, his nieces, all saying he is a dangerous con man that he shouldn't be in charge of anything. He, he's a congenital liar. He is a pathological liar. Look at that Nebraska walls for Trump. That's where they're from is Nebraska. And there they are producers. You don't need me to tell you But Little Birds told me that they're set to do interviews.
Also, his brother in Florida is, get them, get them, get them, get them, get them, get them. Get them now. That's great. Well, other networks lie to you about what?
So apparently this is his brothers, sisters, cousins, okay, so I found that to be a conversation to be had because when somebody endorses somebody, I didn't think it was transferable, but I do think that this is a hint to his character if his entire family betrays him like this. Now, you don't know how distant they are and all of that, but if they're saying that he's a con man, if they're saying that he's a pathological liar, That's what his family's talking about.
There's his family is calling him a pathological liar. They're saying that they endorsed Trump, like, and they don't exactly look like politicians. These look like everyday people. These look like people you would go hang out with and have a few beers and barbecue with. And those are the people that I trust the opinion of.
Not the one Staring on stage waving at everybody like they're you know, the the kamala harris cackle and her dis the amount of disingenuousness That is oozing from kamala harris's face when she goes on stage just irks me so bad like her her
like her her whole deal her cackle her fake laugh or Her smile when she goes on stage is just so disingenuous. You know what, I think I solved the puzzle. I think I know where Kamala Harris has been the last four years. And it's probably acting school, because the way that she acts on stage is so disingenuous.
The way that she speaks the way that she's cackles to things that aren't funny, her own jokes that aren't even funny at all. The way that she smiles when she goes on stage, like she just won an Academy Award every single time. Like she's the people's champion, and everybody loves her like Not the case.
You've been so far underground for so long that you actually think people like you crazy. So next topic here is going to be that Taylor Swift, Taylor Swift, and Travis Kelsey allegedly have a deal to split up on the table and literally on the table, a piece of paper that outlines it from their PR company.
Now the PR company is trying to brush this off and say that, Oh, we don't know anything about this, but it's very clear. But this is the PR company of Travis Kelsey, full scope, and they have a completely outlined plan. Now, some people have tried to say that, oh, it's just because they need to have these contingent, contingent plans in case there is a breakup, right?
That's what his PR firm's doing. It's like, worst case scenario. What is it? And that maybe makes sense, right? If you have a PR firm and you want to plan ahead, you don't want to be scrambling. You want to be proactive for your clients. That makes sense. But what doesn't make sense about it is the fact that it said September 28th was going to be the breakup date.
What's what would be funny. They were like, they hate each other and now they have to, like, they, they hate each other. They, they want to break up. They're done with it. They haven't spent time together, but now. If they want to pull this off by convincing the public that it wasn't all planned, they're going to have to hang out.
They're going to have to be around each other. They're going to have to go in public and pretend that they're actually still dating. And that would be hilarious to me. Here we go. Let's go ahead and watch. This video Taylor Swift's the biggest star in the world. Sorry, Gutfeld. She's been blanketed across the sports media entertainment atmosphere.
The New York Times just speculated. She's a lesbian and last year's tour broke Ticketmaster a tour that's revenue tops the GDP of 50 countries. I mean, I like her music. She's all right, but I mean, have you ever wondered why or how she blew up like this? Well around four years ago. The Pentagon Psychological Operations Unit floated turning Taylor Swift into an asset during a NATO meeting.
What kind of asset? A psy op for combating online misinformation. Listen. Interesting. You came in here wanting to understand how you just go out there and counter an information operation. The idea is that social influence can help It can help encourage or promote behavior change, so potentially as, like, a peaceful information operation.
I include Taylor Swift in here because she's you know, she's a fairly influential online person. I don't know if you've heard of her. Yeah, that's real. The Pentagon's PSYOP unit pitched NATO on turning Taylor Swift into an asset for combating misinformation online. This is nothing new. In the 1950s, the government strong armed Louis Armstrong.
The
Let's just take a second to appreciate that pun from Jesse Waters. They strong armed Louis Armstrong. I think I have something somewhere. No? No? Come on. Oh man, alright. Hey! Look at that, look at that, look at that. I knew, I knew it was there somewhere. We don't get to use those often, but when we do, it's a good time.
Here we go, let's finish a couple, a couple minutes of this. And I've talked about this before, but just so you get the full context. The CIA did the same thing with jazz singer Nina Simone, except they did it without her really knowing. In the 70s, Nixon enlisted Elvis in his war on drugs. He gave the king a badge and named him a covert federal law enforcement agent.
Sheriff. Michael Jackson was tapped by Reagan. Using his song Beat It and his public service campaigns against teen drinking and driving. Michael Jackson persuading minors not to drink. Anyway. So is Swift a front for a covert political agenda? Primetime obviously has no evidence. If we did, we'd share it.
But we're curious. Because the pop star who endorsed Biden is urging millions of her followers to vote. She's sharing links and her boyfriend, Travis Kelsey, sponsored by Pfizer and their relationships boosted the NFL ratings this season, bringing in a whole new demographic. So how's the SIOP going? Well, as usual, Biden's not calling the shots because he doesn't even.
It's going pretty well. Apparently until now, right? They got what they wanted. They brought the Swifties over to the NFL. They got Popularity for Joe Biden and votes for him just four years ago, and they're going to try and do it again. Interesting. Interesting. Interesting. So let's go ahead and read some of this document here.
It says, Travis, Travis Kelsey's team has called in lawyers over the leaked contract that claimed to reveal the exact date his relationship would end with Taylor Swift. Fake PR strategy documents spread online, says Daily Mail, gave illusion their year long love story was a sham. Nobody said that it's, like, that's not fake.
It's from Taylor Swift. It's a PR company. Here it is. Let's read some of the document here. It says, and this was a Snapchat, the front page of the alleged full scope contract. It says, comprehensive media plan for Travis Kelsey's public relations following breakup with Taylor Swift.
Confidentiality. Notice someone's getting fired. The document is intended for internal use only and contains confidential information regarding the media strategy of Kevin Kelsey. It is not to be shared or any external parties or unauthorized individuals. All details within the written document are insensitive and designed to manage the public image of Travis Kelsey effectively.
Unauthorized distribution and disclosure of this document is strictly prohibited. Oops! Oops. Objective to effectively manage and mitigate the fallout from there. I'm, I'm excited to see if this is like chat, GPT generated, cause I'm usually pretty good at telling to effectively manage and mitigate the fallout from the breakup between Travis Kelsey and Taylor Swift.
It doesn't say potential by the way, and Sherman Travis, Kelsey retains a positive public image minimize negative media portrayal and continues to build his personal and professional brand. Okay. Key messages. Here's what they're going to say. Respect and privacy. Right? Respect and privacy. Emphasize that the breakup is a mutual decision made with respect to each other's personal lives.
Stress the importance of privacy during the period to allow individuals to focus on respective personal growth and careers. Professional focus. Highlight Kelsey's commitment to his career and ongoing achievements in the sports industry. Showcase recent milestones, upcoming games, and his involvement in major sporting events.
And personal growth. Frame the breakup as a natural part of life and an opportunity for personal evolution. And share how Kelsey is focusing on personal development, self improvement, and resilience. Look at that. Let's go to another page. There it is. And it says distribution, comment the establish, or the statement should be, Let's see, I'm trying to read this.
Gracious, respectful, and stress mutual respect. Example, Travis and Taylor have decided to part ways after careful consideration. They both value and respect each other's personal lives and just appreciate your respect and privacy during this time. The time. Now this is what people find to be really interesting about this because this could be a document that's outlining just how they would respond.
Until the time is stated and it's recent. And this all is very reasonable for a PR company. Like, it's not like somebody is exaggerating. It's not saying that if you're going to be salacious and post a fake PR document for Travis Kelsey and Taylor Swift, it would say some crazy stuff. It would say that he cheated or she cheated or there's, she cheated on him with John Mayer and they're getting back together, like they would make it way more salacious than this.
And the fact that it has a date on it also makes it very interesting. Which is why people are saying obviously this is legitimate. It says media interviews, secure interviews with reputable sports and lifestyle outlets known for balancing balanced reporting. Target platforms include sports outlets, ESPN, sports illustrated in the Atlantic, lifestyle entertainment, vanity fair, GQ people's magazine, and local news talking points, focus on Kelsey's recent sport achievements and future goals, emphasize the respect for Taylor Swift and mutual decision to part ways, avoid discussing personal details about the relationship and breakup.
Very, very interesting. Even says to do mock interviews with Travis prior to the, alleged non existent media scrubs on this. So, there you have it. Find it to be pretty interesting. It'll be even more funny when they have to stay together. We are still, still, still together. because your PR firm leaked all the information and now it's going to be very readily in everybody's head when you go to do all these tactics and use all these talking points at the exact same news outlets on the exact same day.
So now you have to stay together. Sucks for you. Write a song about it. That's all I got to say. All right. Speaking of pitch decks, well, we weren't speaking about pitch decks, but business documents. There's a way to segue that somehow. Speaking of business documents, Here's a pitch deck that is out there right now.
And this should, this should terrify you. This should absolutely terrify you. There's a company called CMG and they have a pitch deck on predictive audience technology and the power of the voice. And Our devices, microphones. Now this company is obviously selling advertising opportunities helping you to target your audiences for things like Facebook ads, Google pay per click ads with geofencing.
So it's talks about a 10 and 20 mile radius have a marketing background, can talk about these things. Talks about a 10 to 20 mile geo fenced radius around these ad campaigns. But the way that they're going to get the data for you to help you target these people is more specific and invasive than any other marketing, advertising use case ever, right?
Like this is the most invasive technology that you could imagine. They want to listen to your microphones and not they want to. They are, according to this pitch deck, they are listening to your microphones, gathering that data, scrubbing hundreds of thousands of hours of you talking to your spouse, you making love with your spouse, you talking politics with your cousin, you, whatever it is that you talk about, they're listening on your phone, on your Alexa, and on your computer, your smart TV, everything and anything that has a microphone is a suspect here.
And they show it right here on this slide. And what it says is the power of voice in our devices, microphones, smart devices, capture real time intent data by listening to our conversations. Advertisers compare this voice data with behavioral data to target in market consumers. We use AI. We use, we use, we use, they are actively doing this right now.
We use AI to collect this voice data. Data from 470 sources to improve campaign deployment, targeting, and performance. You can reach your potential customers before your competitors by listening into their microphones, listening into their homes, their bathrooms, their bedrooms. This is the most egregious privacy violation in history, and this should terrify everybody.
This is unacceptable because if CMG can do this, CMG local solutions. If some random marketing advertising organization can do this, imagine what the NSA and the CIA is doing. And I've talked about this for the longest time. People like, Oh, they're listening. And then they advertise to me. Oh, they're listening.
Then they, they must've heard me talk from through my phone. And then I got this advertisement a minute later and everybody was like, no, no, there's no way that they could do that. They can't scrub the data. They don't have the ability to do it. They don't have the processing possibility or power to be able to do that.
Now they do, they have AI. I have AI use transcriptions all the time for this podcast for plenty of things that I do. So as long as they can listen to your microphone, they can transcribe your conversations. They know exactly what you're doing, who you're talking to, why you're talking to them, and what you're talking to them about.
Then they can use that data, put it into a machine learning process or machine learning system. They can use a large language model, something like GPT, and then they can scrub all those conversations to see what are the top 10 products that Austin Adams is interested in this week. And then they can target you with that information.
They can also target you. If they're the FBI, if they're the CIA, if they're the local police force, if you're, they're the election police, right? Whatever that is down the road, you have to think about that now. This technology is just emerging to where they actually have the capabilities of listening to every conversation you have, determining intent, and then doing something about it.
Now let's read through some more of this. It says consumers leave data trails based on their conversations and online behavior, AI collects and analyzes this behavior and voice data from 470 sources. Processing voice data with behavioral data identifies an audience who is ready to buy. We take this data and align it with your products and services to build an audience list in a defined 10 mile radius.
This audience list is uploaded into our ad platforms to target your digital advertising. Once launched, the technology automatically analyzes your site traffic and customers to fuel audience targeting with an ongoing basis. After prep and setup of your account, we developed your audience list. Using the encrypted list.
We target your audience through streaming TV, audio display, and pre roll paid social Google Bing and mobile instantly grow and target a hyper relevant audience, reduce click and acquisition costs, generate lookalike audiences at a fraction of the cost to look like audiences, essentially, when you have a list of a hundred people that all have similar traits, they can try to find a 1 percent comparison of interest to that list to retarget.
So if you have a list of a hundred people, that list can turn into a thousand people that look. Or act just like those people. Pricing a hundred dollars a day or $200 a day for a 10 mile radius or a 20 mile radius. It's actually fairly cheap. We partner with the best to provide the best They have.
This company partnered with Google, Amazon, and Facebook, which seems to be kind of alluding to who those partnerships are that they're getting those 470 pieces of data from. Yeah. Wow. So there you have it. CMG, local solutions. is now listening into your conversations. And if they have access to this data, so does Facebook.
So does Google. So does Amazon, right? So does the FBI. So does the CIA. So does the local police department. So does the thought police. So does the, the, the, you know, The election police, this should terrify everybody.
Now, one thing that I've heard Joe Rogan talk about, and you know, the deal by now, there's only one way to stop this from happening, right? There's only one way to stop the relay of information out to these companies, right? If you work at a company where there's sensitive information, where you talk to your spouse about something you don't want your phone to hear.
Right? Your cameras should be covered on your phone. Your cameras should be covered on your, your laptop. You shouldn't have home security systems like Wwise or Ring. They have access to all of it. The walls have been breached. They can access your home whenever they want if you have cameras, if you have a cell phone, if you have a webcam, if you have a microphone, if you have an Alexa.
The walls have been breached. Now it's time to do something about it before it's weaponized against you. They're building a profile. They're determining what they can sell you to take your money from you, that you worked so hard for it by convincing you through marketing campaigns, they're determining if you're going to vote for this person or that person, but there's only one way to stop it.
And it's by putting your cell phone somewhere where they cannot hear you. One, that's one way to do it. Unplugging all of your Amazon. Getting rid of your ring camera. Getting rid of your, your Wyze cameras from Amazon,
which Wyze just introduced a that's like one of the lower cost security systems. Wyze just introduced an AI feature where you can search through all of the data where you can search through all of your camera stuff. And this is honestly almost as terrifying as this, Speech, the predictive audience technology that CMG is talking about here.
This should terrify you too. Why is the security system company security camera company just came out with a email talking about how they are going to allow you to search any and all of your footage using AI search algorithms. So if you have cameras inside and outside of your house, you can say, Hey, Show me all of the video footage of packages being dropped off.
Show me all of the video footage of my wife leaving or coming home. Show me all of the videos of our dog taking a shit. Like, why do we need that? We don't need that. You can give us like the little trinkets as a result of the technology that you've developed, but they didn't develop that technology for us.
They developed this technology for military uses. They developed this technology so that they can increase their totalitarian fingers into your life. They developed this technology. So conglomerate organizations, commercial companies out there can profit on godly amounts of money. They did not make this technology for you.
They made it for them. And you should be very weary when you use it. Now you can utilize something called when it comes to your phone, right? Unplug your Alexa. Put it, put a cover on your webcam. Now you can use something when it comes to your cell phone, right? If you have you know, certain trade secrets that you need for your company.
If you have private conversations with your wife that you don't want people to hear, right? Because then they can weaponize, they can blackmail you. They could send an audio of you talking about bad about your boss, right? So many different ways that this can be used, like millions and millions of terrible things can happen from this, but you can do one thing about it.
And that's utilizing a. Faraday phone sleeve, just like this. Okay. Now this is from my company Ronin and all you do is you pop this open. This is the final version. Finally got the sample in yesterday. The production is ongoing right now at my manufacturer and we will have these in just a couple of weeks and you can just slide your phone right inside of this.
You can put your phone right inside of this Faraday bag. It's a bad example cause it's hard to do it and be on camera, but here you go. Put your phone inside of that Faraday bag. Has a nice looking magnetic strip here that closes for you. And all of the signals from your phone go away. They can't, they can't listen to your microphone.
They can't see your camera, right? They can't do any of that if your phone is in a Faraday bag. They can't even send you a text message if you have a Faraday bag. So, Get yourself a Faraday bag. There's several companies out there that sell these. Wait a couple of weeks, buy one from ronanbasics. com. That would be supporting me right here in this endeavor to give you the tools that you need to help fight back against modern technology, which has many, many threats, including EMFs, right?
Data and privacy breaches. So many, so many ways that they're weaponizing technology against you. One way to fight back is a Faraday Sleeve from Ronin. Now we got a couple colors. This is the sand color, which I truly like the most. And then we have this slate color. Color as well. So a couple of weeks, these will be available.
You can get 10 and 15 percent off by going to Ronan basics. com. That will sign you up for our newsletter, right? When it pops up and you'll get 15 percent off of your order. Go put your email and your text messages on. Turn on the put in your phone number and I will send you a text personally when the launch happens and you will get 15 percent off.
So head over Ronan basics. com R O N I N basics. com. Get yourself a Faraday phone sleeve. Stop CMG from tracking you and the day the government from being able to know everything that you talk about. Alright, there you have it. Next thing we're going to talk about here is going to be the school shooting.
So, yesterday in Georgia, in Appalachia there was a school shooting terrible, terrible in Georgia. And so it says a 14 year old student fatally shot four people in a rampage at a Georgia high school, officials say. And this comes from AP News. I'm sick of this, guys. I'm sick of it. It makes my heart sink.
I have children. I have children who are school age. I'm so done with it. As a parent, it's terrifying. As a human, it's so sad. And as a father, it's very concerning. I hate seeing this every time. And like, the more and more this happens, the more I understand the people who are shouting for gun control.
Right? I'll say that one more time. The more this happens, the more I understand the people asking for gun control. The more school shootings there are, the more it makes sense to me why people hold that position. Because we just don't know what to do about this. Right? There's no answers. I don't think that that's the answer.
I don't think taking people's guns away is the answer. I don't think it'll help anything. I think if anything, the answer is probably arming people within the school systems, which is another difficult barrier to overcome. I think the answer is having active police forces on site at every police or at every high school with armed, trained police officers who can eliminate a threat.
I don't think the answer is taking away guns. But I do understand the argument when everybody just throws up their hands and goes, I don't know what to do, stop, stop this from happening.
It's, like, it's terrible. A 14 year old, like, dude, this kid was 10. 10 years old, a child. A baby. Just 4 years ago. And now they grab a weapon and open fire and kill 4 people.
Like, what do we do? Well, to me, you know, I think the answer is mental health. I think the answer has to do with pharmaceutical medications, I think the answer has to do far more about pharmaceuticals than it does the weapons, because this 14 year old could have went in there and stabbed a bunch of people.
It says a 14 year old student opened fire to the Georgia High School and killed four people on Wednesday, authorities said, sending students scrambling for shelter in their classrooms, and eventually to the football stadium, as officers swarmed the campus and parents raced to find if their children were safe.
The dead were identified as two students and two teachers at Appalachee High School in Winder, about an hour's drive from Atlanta. Killed were two fourteen year olds, Mason Schermerhorn and Christian Angulo, and teachers Richard Aspinwall and Christina Iremi. Georgia Bureau of Investigative Director Chris Hosey said in a nighttime news conference,
At least nine other people, eight students and one teacher, were taken to hospitals with injuries, all expected to survive. The words, hard lockdown, appeared on a screen in junior Leila Farrell's health class, and lights began flashing. She and her frightened classmates piled desks and chairs in front of the door to create a barricade.
Sophomore Kaylee Abner, was in geometry class when she heard the gunshots. She and her classmates ducked behind their teacher's desk, and then the teacher began flipping the desk in an attempt to barricade the classroom's door. A classmate beside her was praying, and she held his hand, and while they all waited for police.
After students poured into the football stadium, Abner saw teachers who had taken off their shirts to help treat gunshot wounds. Two school resource officers encountered the shooter within minutes after a report of shots were, that shots went out. The suspect, a student at the school, immediately surrendered and was taken into custody.
You coward. He is being charged as an adult with murder. Authorities said the weapon was an assault style rifle. The teen had been interviewed after the FBI received anonymous tips in 2023 of May about online threats to commit an unspecified school shooting. So the knew about this kid. More than a year ago that he was planning to do this and it still happened, right?
But I mean, what can you do if you can't prove anything? How do you take them? You can't take them to jail. You can't put them in juvie, right? You should put them in therapy and have consistent follow up. I mean, that's the answer. The FBI narrowed the threats down and referred to the case to the Sheriff's department at Jackson County, which is an adjacent to Barrow County.
The Sheriff's office interviewed the then 13 year old and his father who said there were hunting guns in the house. But the teen did not have unsupervised access to them. The teen also denied making on the online. The Sheriff's office alerted local schools for continued monitoring of the team, but there was no probable cause for arrest.
Yeah. Right. That's difficult. How, what, what can you do legally? Jose said that the state division of family and children services, also a previous contact with the team and we'll investigate whether or not that has any connection with the shooting authorities were still looking into how the suspect obtained the gun used in the shooting and got it into the school.
Yeah, no school. No, no gun zones don't work guys. There's probably a sign and it was illegal, right? It doesn't help to have additional gun control. My heart hurts for these kids. My head hurts or my heart hurts for our community He said but I want to make it very clear that hate will not prevail in this County I want to be very clear and known love will prevail over what happened today.
Gosh, just imagine if that was your kid Before Wednesday, there had been 29 mass shootings in the U. S. so far this year. According to a database maintained by the Associated Press and U. S. Today in partnership with Northeastern University, at least 127 people have died in those 29 mass shootings, which are defined as incidents with four or more people have died within a 24 hour period, not including the killer.
The same definition used by the FBI. So 29 mass shootings this year now that doesn't that also includes like gang related shootings Which excuse that quite a bit last year ended with 217 deaths and 42 mashing I want to know like how many school shootings are there now how many people shot each other in Chicago?
I'm Wednesday and wonder Landon Culver an 11th grader said he stepped out of his algebra class to get a drink of water when he Heard shots and then saw someone wearing a black hoodie with a long gun. I didn't really stick around too long to look he said Instead, he ran back inside the classroom and locked the door.
The class huddled in the back in the dark and waited for a rampage to end. Culver listened as gunshots rang out in the building. You're just wondering, like, which one of those is going to be somebody that you're best friends with or somebody that you love. Later police officers arrived and escorted the students out as they were leaving the building.
Culver saw multiple people who had been shot. You hear about this kind of stuff and you're like, you never think it's going to happen until it's happening.
Jeez. Oh, man. So like I said, I understand. I understand the position. I mean, I understand the emotional attachment to wanting gun control here. I think it's a flawed argument. I think it doesn't work. I think that there's better arguments and that in many cases, equipping people who are capable. With the tools that they need to fight back is probably the better answer.
But again, I, I, I'm not on insensitive to why people believe that because it's just like, what do you do with this point? How, what can we do? What can we try? What, what, what are the opportunities here? Is it eliminating pharmaceutical medications to people under the age of whatever, right? How, how can we solve this issue?
Even if it's one a year, two a year, three a year, that's terrible. How can we solve this issue and what can we done about it? And I don't think there's an answer. I don't think there's a right answer, and I think it'll continue, and it'll continue whether there was no guns in the world. Right, the problem with gun control is that the people that you should fear most, historically, is the government.
And they're not giving their guns away. So no matter how many school shootings there are, the argument that guns are, getting rid of guns in the public's hand is the answer, is not the correct answer. Because the enemy is the one taking your guns. Always, historically, is the government that is over top of you, the totalitarian regimes that eventually occur when there is no ability to fight back against your government.
And these, these deaths are sad and terrible and I hope they never happen and I hope there's a solution and
it's just not the answer.
So, the Tennessee Star did come out with a with the, Audrey Hale's manifesto from Nashville, Tennessee.
But we're going to cover that next time. I think it deserves a little bit more time and attention, although I would say there's not a ton in there that talks about why, other than the trans situation and some weird love interests. So stick around next time. Without keeping you around too long, subscribe, leave a five star review.
I appreciate you head over to RonanBasics. com, put in your information into the email pop up that jumps up there and the text messages, and you'll get 15 percent off and you'll have first notice when these phone sleeves launch, right? Very excited about this. This is what I'm most excited about. This is really why I went down this path.
You can also get yourself a Faraday EMF blocking hat, which is the one I'm wearing on my head. I will see you next time here, the Atoms Archive.
Atoms Archive.
-
Shield your mind from EMF's with the Ronin 10foil Baseball Hat— https://roninbasics.com/product/10foil-faraday-baseball-hat/
----more----
In The Adams Archive, we go beyond the surface to uncover the real stories shaping our world. Each episode dissects current events, political maneuvers, and hidden agendas, forcing you to see the world from a new perspective. Here’s what we dive into:
Key Themes:
Media Manipulation & MrBeast’s Silence: What’s really happening behind the scenes of YouTube’s biggest star, MrBeast? We discuss his 30-day silence following the revelation that his trans co-host was allegedly involved in child grooming, and we investigate the mysterious sources of his immense wealth. Are powerful backers influencing the content and messages pushed on his platform?
Political Power Plays: RFK Jr. Endorses Trump & the JFK Files: Explore the unexpected alliance between RFK Jr. and Donald Trump, including Trump’s promise to release the remaining JFK assassination files. We dive into the implications of this endorsement and why RFK Jr. suspended his campaign in key states to avoid splitting the vote.
Censorship & the Arrest of Telegram’s Founder: Why was Telegram’s founder, Pavel Durov, arrested in France, and what does it mean for freedom of speech? We break down the charges against him, including the alleged complicity in criminal activities due to Telegram's refusal to censor its platform.
The Propaganda of Kamala’s Amazon Hat Trick: How did Kamala Harris’s campaign manage to dominate Amazon’s “Top New Release” list with barely any sales or reviews? We reveal the manipulation behind these numbers and discuss what it says about the state of political marketing and propaganda in the digital age.
Dystopian Realities: North Korea’s Utopia Conspiracy & the Defection of a U.S. Soldier: Could North Korea be hiding a secret utopia? We examine theories suggesting that the isolated nation is sitting on untapped trillions and advanced technologies, contrasting them with the bizarre defection of a U.S. soldier who fled there claiming racial discrimination in the U.S. Army.
Join the conversation that challenges everything you think you know. Subscribe to The Adams Archive on your favorite podcast platform, and follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media for more in-depth content. Your support makes a difference—thank you for being part of our journey.
All the Links:
For direct access to all our content and platforms, visit linktr.ee/theaustinjadams.
----more----
Full Transcription
The Adams Archive.
Hello, beautiful people, and welcome to The Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we're going to be doing not one, but two deep dives, starting off the episode by looking at the most recent news about Mr. Beast. Now, it has officially been one month, and For since Mr.
Beast has come out and stated publicly that he knew that the transsexual person that was working for him was allegedly grooming children. Now it's been 30 days. So we want to see what he's up to. And I will tell you what he's been up to. And that will lead us into a further discussion about where this man even gets his money from.
So that's how we're going to start the show off. Once we move through that topic, we're going to discuss about how the CEO of Telegram, the founder of Pavel, has been arrested in France. And now the official charges are out. So we will take a look at that. Some of the things that people have said surrounding that situation and more.
We'll also take a look at the RFK Jr. endorsement, some of the situations that have come of that, including him losing his secret service detail as a result. Then we will transition into some of the propaganda. And, uh, we've seen around the Kamala Harris, Tim walls campaign that has now found its way to Amazon hats.
You might be curious and I was too. So we'll talk about that too. Then we will finalize our discussion here today with a U S soldier who fled to North Korea, defected to North Korea, who is a part of the U S army because he said, quote unquote, the way that they treated minorities. And that will lead us into a very, very untouchable topic, which is the idea of North Korea being a utopia.
We've seen all this propaganda, we've seen all of the conversations that the government has told us to believe about North Korea, all of the silly videos that have come out as a result from their leader, Kim Jong Un. But I have some questions. So we will talk about the Somewhat compelling, somewhat, I don't know what to call it.
I wouldn't say it's satirical, but I would say it's an interesting thought experiment. Uh, so we will talk about the possibility that North Korea is a utopia because apparently according to many resources, or according to many, uh, online resources, they are sitting on trillions of dollars, trillions of dollars of resources themselves.
So all of that and more, but first, I need you to do one thing for me, which is I need you to subscribe, leave a five star review wherever you're at, you can actually watch this podcast on YouTube, if you would like, and you can subscribe there too. Once you do that, I want you to head over to Ronan basics.
com. Ronan is my company. That is a Faraday goods company. And we offer things like phone sleeves that protect your digital footprint, eliminate your digital footprint hats that block EMF radiation from being able to reach your brain in more. So head over to Ronan basics. com. Go check it out. Protect yourselves from the harmful.
Technology that is surrounding us all of the time that the government is trying to hide from you. And I don't say that like, I'm not trying to be a alarmist in that. It's very, very real. I've been doing a lot of research on this. I did a 5g episode. Um, I've done a lot of research on EMFs more recently since I launched the company and even before it's the reason I launched my company was because there was so many, article so many people talking about it and so many scientific studies with have proven that there are serious harmful side effects to the technology that you have that you're listening to this on that you could be even driving at this moment, your Wi Fi router, the 5g nodes that you see literally in toxifying your visual Space all the time when you're driving, I see all of these 5g towers, and it's the ugliest thing in the world.
But that's not the worst of it. The worst of it is that it can cause terrible things like cancer, insomnia, heart palpitations, heart issues, so many, so many things, a literal laundry list, laundry list of health effects, and the ways that it can harm you and your loved ones. So head over to Ronan basics.
com. Check it out, get yourself our 10 foil Faraday hat looks beautiful, and And you'll protect yourself from EMF radiation. It has silver lined fabric, which does that for you. Uh, so go check it out. Ronanbasics. com sign up for our newsletter there. You'll get 10 percent off. And if you leave your phone number, you'll get 15 percent off.
And I promise I won't text you personally, at least late at night. And you will actually get a 15 percent off coupon just for adding your number. So all of that more stick around in without further ado, let's get started. Jump into it.
It has officially been 30 days since Mr. Beast came out and said that he had become aware of serious allegations surrounding his co host, Chris, the transsexual who was grooming children. Now, if you're curious what Mr. Beast has been up to in those 30 days, Let's take a look and see what he has been doing.
Now, here is the tweet from MrBeast, which says, 29 days ago, well, the 24th, so coming up on, uh, 31 days. He said, Over the last few days, I've become aware of serious allegations of Ava Tysons, not Chris Ava. That's the name. I think it was Chris before, now it's Ava. Um, Ava Tyson's behavior online, and I'm disgusted and opposed to such unacceptable acts.
I would hope so. You're talking about children here. During that time, I have been focused on hiring an independent third party to conduct a thorough investigation to ensure I have all the facts. That said, I've seen enough online and taken immediate action to remove Ava from the company, my channel, and any association with Mr.
Beast. I do not condone or support any of the inappropriate actions. I will allow the independent investigators the necessary time to conduct a comprehensive investigation and will take further actions based on their findings. This was seen by a hundred and six million people. Now I have one question as a result of that.
Where's the thorough investigation? Where's the thorough investigation, Mr. Beast? We should be able to know that you weren't hiding this from the general public while also getting hundreds of millions of views and money. From all of these online sources, including the time that our children, the time that adults have been spending watching your videos while you have been at least passively aware.
Of what this man was doing to these children. So where's the investigation, Mr. Beast? We want to know. Also, let's take a look at what you've been up to for these 30 days since this post, because you haven't posted a thing on Twitter. You haven't updated us at all in regards to the information surrounding this allegation for the person that you hired and kept around and, and brought a focus around.
Right. And so when you think that there's these huge, literally the most publicly known. Transsexual, besides Caitlyn Jenner, is Mr. B's co host, Ava, or Chris, whatever his name is, right? The most well known, the most in the public eye, the most seen, was Mr. B's co host. And so when you have something that's so in the public sphere, when you have something that's being pushed by the government, and by the, the, the social, uh, Being that is the grossness of our society's, you know, who, who controls our society.
We're not going to get into that today. Sorry, guys, but you might know what I'm talking about when you get into the idea of where these social constructs come from and how they're being publicly pushed with funneled with hundreds of billions of dollars to push these ideologies to crumble our society from inside.
Once you realize that, and then you look at the people who. Who are engaged in this at the most visual level. This is the one. This is the one. This is the one your kids know about. This is the one who hundreds of millions of children watched Mr. Beast condone this transsexual being pushed in front of them, wearing makeup, putting on women's clothes, and then passing himself off as a woman when really all he was was a pedophile, weirdo.
That's the reality, right? So when you realize that, and then you look at him, not updating us, not making a single statement, not saying a thing about this for 30 full days. Well, he had to been up to something, right? He had to have some, some serious investigations going on on his side, at least I would hope so.
So let's take a look at his YouTube channel and see in the last 30 days that Mr. Beast has been silent about the transsexual that was a part of his team for years. Years, years and years and years. What has he been up to? Well, let's go ahead and take a look in the last 30 days. Here are Mr. Beast's post.
Well, he had 50 YouTubers fight for 100 million. I've gathered 50 of the biggest YouTubers on the planet. And whichever one lasts the longest in this cube wins that million dollars for their subscribers. Never before seen in YouTube history. One billion subscribers worth of YouTubers are competing for one million dollars.
And the rules are simple. All right, put the camera down. Close the line. Okay. So, if you step on the red line, you lose your subscribers a million dollars. So be careful. Last to leave Okay, so there's one thing he was doing, which was challenging a bunch of YouTubers for a million dollars to stay in a box.
That's what was more interesting than him investigating his team. Let's see number two. I just built this bunker and these two people who have never met each other are going to attempt to live down here for the next 100 days. Take your blindfolds off. Hugo, this is Rayne. Rayne, this is Hugo. This is our first time ever meeting, and this is the nuclear bunker.
They will call home. Everything you would need to live for the next 100 days is in this bunker. Dang. You can even grow your own vegetables. Oh, cool. And if you come over here, you'll find your bedroom all 40 feet underground. Wait, what? Oh my God. Above you is a bed. Nice. And here's another bed and moose.
Okay. There's another thing. He's been up to blocking two people in a pseudo bunker, 40 feet under the ground for another. 500, 000. So there's 1. 5 million this man is giving away. He has to be rich from what? We'll look in a minute. And what else has he been up to? Well, during the time that he should have been investigating this pedophile on his team, he also I don't normally do intros like this, but I'm currently descending hundreds of feet into a cave that runs over five kilometers deep into the earth.
And whether we like it or not, as soon as my friends and I touched the ground, we are officially stranded here for the next seven days. That might've been the scariest thing I've ever done. First things. All right. So There you have it. That's what he's been up to. Instead of truly investigating, maybe, I don't know, contemplating, soul searching as to why he held this pedophile so close to him for so long and had no idea.
No idea at all. Or did he? Because many people allege that he was aware of these actions. And now, I'm not somebody who's trying to hate on Mr. Beast. I think he's trying to His videos are phenomenal. I think that the work that he's been able to do and build his, his following is amazing, but I have some questions.
What else are you been up to? Well, these things don't seem to be as important as gaining back the loyalty from the parents who let their children watch you or the parents themselves who watch this guy's seen by everybody. He's not just seen by children, right? This is that, but a big, vast. large percentage of his audience happens to be children who he enabled this trans person to be around constantly gave them the platform that gave them the power over these children made this person a celebrity all while this pedophile was pretending to be a woman validated that to his audience and then acts so surprised when that person actually ends up being a pedophile Hmm.
That's weird. Very weird. So where does this man get his money? He gave away 1. 5 million. 1. 5 million in just two weeks there, according to those two videos. Interesting. So let's look here. Now, somebody alleges this was one year ago. YouTuber MrBeast is funded by people with deep pockets. Who could those people be?
Because he's definitely not making all of his money from YouTube. You don't spend that much money producing a video and then give away that much money and with 30 million views on YouTube, 40 million, 50 million, 90 million. Make it all back every single time. Like he's definitely losing money on a lot of this.
So here we go. So did you know that Osman Gold and Mr. Beast along belong to the same talent agency and that they are both directly connected to Disney and Amazon? Today, I learned that a company named Knight Media literally manages basically every single Zoomer E celebrity, including Hasan Piker, Nikolulu, Dream, and these guys.
If you ever look at the YouTube trending tab, at least one of Knight's talents will be up there. Knight Media is a subsidiary of Knight Inc. Itself is valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars from venture capitalists and angel investors. Who owns Knight? Well, the CEO of Knight Media is Reid Dusher.
who formerly worked for the NFL and then went to be the Dude Perfect's manager. The president of the night is Ezra Cooperstein, who is previously the president of Fullscreen and Rooster Teeth, as well as Maker Studios, which is now part of Disney Digital Network. Ironically, neither of these guys are the real talent managers, as that position is for their 90 employees, including Andrew Pelosi, a former higher up at Influential.
What is Influential? Influential is an AI, social data, and conversion technology. As well as a developer partner of IBM Watson and a Facebook marketing partner. Utilizing a network of over 1 million social media influencers as a tactic for distribution, Influential runs both native and paid campaigns on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter, and YouTube for Fortune 500 brands.
Influential is owned by Jeremy Steinberg. Night Inc. is directly financed by the Sherman Group, aka TCG, one of its executive members being Alexandra Moore, a former executive from Amazon who focused on mergers and acquisitions. However, TCG itself is financed by Providence Equity, an ECG compliance private equity investment firm valued over 300 billion.
All this information is freely available. I literally just ran names off of LinkedIn and read business articles. Hmm. So. One of them, Felipe Neto, is now the most powerful man in Brazil. He profited off of every single political trend over the bizarre last decade. He's the architect of YouTube content system.
His business has gone so deep into Portugal that some kids are speaking Brazilian Portuguese. Hmm. Somebody else said, dead internet. Right? Have you ever heard of the dead internet theory? Basically, that everybody and anybody that you interact with on the internet is fake. And that the internet essentially turned into a strip mall from the world itself, where you only have several small choices as to where to go at any given time, essentially.
Very interesting theory. Uh, let's see. What else we got in here. So, the people who fund this are essentially worth over 300, 000.
It's not this like boots from the ground, you know, bootstrapping YouTube channel. This guy is backed by huge money. He's not just taking all of his money and funneling it back into there from ad campaigns being ran on his YouTube channel. There is very, very powerful people behind Mr. Beast. It's not this, you know, from the ground up type of thing.
So all of that to say, that you should at least be considering the idea that maybe this man isn't as organic as he seems. Maybe you should be considering the idea that some of the themes that he's going to promote in his videos aren't themes that he wants to promote personally. Even some of the people that he puts on his team, a la Ava, may not be there because it's what's in the best interest for your children, for you, for society to have involved.
And, at the end of the day, this man has done nothing to come out and say, here's what the investigators have found. Nothing. And that's what, I guess we'll have to wait and see. Is he hoping, is he, what it looks like to me is that he's playing the PR game where they just tell you, shut up and it'll go away.
Well, shut up and it will go away may work for many things. I don't think it exactly works for you promoting a pedophile to hundreds of millions of people during a, as a Trojan horse through the trans movement. And by movement, I mean the trans mind virus. That is permeating our culture right now. And isn't it funny that almost every single time you see these people in the public eye, they eventually are on Fox news for being arrested for something.
Interesting. Interesting. All right. Now that leads us to another topic, kind of in the public sphere as of late, although this one seems to be a little bit more about censorship, which is that the official charges have been released against the telegram founder, Pavel Durov. during his arrest in France.
And here they, Durov is facing up to 20 years in prison. Now here are the charges. And almost every single one of these has the word complicity. What they're trying to essentially state is that by not censoring people, that he is in, that he is in violation of their country's laws. By not censoring them.
Okay. Complicity Web Mastering an online platform enable to enable an illegal transaction, an organized group refusal to communicate at the request of competent authorities. Okay. Competent is an interesting word there for them. Complicity, possessing pornographic images of minors, complicity, distributing, offering, or making available pornographic images of miners.
Complicity. Acquiring, transporting, or possessing, offering, or selling narcotic substances. So they're basically saying anything and everything that's been done illegal on our platform, on your platform, unless you comply with us, we're going to come after you for everything anybody's ever done on the platform because you didn't listen to us and you didn't censor these people.
That's what they're saying. Complicity, organized fraud. Complicity, making selling or making available without legitimate reason, tools, programs, or data designed for or adapted to get access to or damage the operation of automated data processing systems. Wow. That's a stretch. Criminal association with a view.
To committing a crime or an offense punishable by five more years of imprisonment, laundering of the proceeds derived from organized groups, offenses, or crimes, providing cryptology services amid to ensure confidentiality without certified declaration, providing a cryptology tool, not solely ensuring authentication or integrity monitoring without prior declaration, importing a cryptology tool, ensuring authenticity or integrating monitoring without prior declaration.
Wow. So,
Now somebody warned, I believe it was somebody that was, uh, had spoken out against Trump before. I don't know, that was just the headline that I read. But essentially they were warning that, oh well, Elon Musk, you might be next. And that's like, if this holds up in court, on the court of law, in this country, yeah.
If they're just gonna come after you for anything and everything anybody's ever done on your platform unless you comply with their censorship, Then yes, absolutely. They're going to go after Elon. They should go after Mark Zuckerberg. They're going to go after literally everybody and anybody who hosts any large website or platform.
That's the reality of this. But guess what? It's only going to be applied specifically to people who they don't like or who don't do exactly what they want. And the second that you step out of line, we're going to jail you for it. Not for something that you did, but for something that you Allowed to happen within your platform, right?
Like you're supposed to be able to watch hundreds of millions of people's actions and do something about every single one of them all of the time. Crazy.
Somebody said, Same can be said about any messaging platform ever, including the postal service. That's a great point, right? So if this guy has to go to jail, so does everybody involved in the USPS offices. Great point. All of it could be true. Some of it could be true. None of it could be true. None of that matters when you have the machine against you.
Now this guy's going to jail before literally anybody is going to jail for Epstein's List. Isn't that interesting? Now, transitioning over to Trump and RFK Jr. Now, Trump, uh, RFK Jr. suspended his campaign in the states that he said, um, would affect the potentially affect the outcome in a negative way towards Trump.
So he essentially said, I'm going to suspend my, my campaign in these states. Now, the reason that he did that was actually quite interesting because he said, there's still a chance that he could potentially, if Kamala, And Donald Trump essentially tie in electoral votes that it could come down to a potential, uh, a runoff race, right?
Where he could actually, if he remains on the ballot, could still have a chance to become president. So he said, I'm going to pull out of every state that would potentially negatively affect Trump. As a result, he's hoping that he could find himself in a position in office under Trump. Now, during this time, Trump accepted RFK Jr.
's endorsement and he vowed, Trump vowed to release the JFK assassination files. Now, it says, Hours after being endorsed by third party candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Donald Trump said he would release all of the remaining documents pertaining to the assassination of John F. Kennedy if he were elected president in November, as part of a proposed new commission on presidential assassination attempts, including The one that targeted him.
Now, if you recall, it may have been my last podcast or potentially the one before it, but I said this, he would be crazy not to release these documents. They literally, the same people that killed Bobby Kennedy, that killed John F. Kennedy, all of them are likely involved. At least the agencies, because some of those people are going to be dead at this point, are very likely involved in Donald Trump's assassination.
It says, speaking at a rally in Glendale. Arizona, Trump also pledged that if elected, he would establish a panel of top experts that would work with Kennedy, a prominent anti vaccine advocate, this says, to investigate childhood health problems,
as they should. Now, when you go back and you listen to RFK's speech that he did, pulling out of it, I think Robert F. Kennedy's speech was one of the greatest speeches in history. Ever in politics by any politician ever. And honestly, if you've been listening to me for quite some time, you know, that I have considered for a very long time voting for Robert F.
Kennedy jr. And this speech solidified why I felt that way. Everything that is wrong with politics is embodied in one way or another in each of the candidates that are left. And one being completely corrupt, terribly unequipped to take office, absolutely a puppet for the establishment, and the other being pretty divisive.
Now again, I voted for Donald Trump. I'll vote for Donald Trump again. I voted for him the last two elections. Now that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is out of the way. But I just want you to go listen to To RFK jr speech and not understand like there's no way you don't understand why he's a compelling candidate that man is the only man not wearing a mask in some way shape or form and maybe trump isn't wearing a mask maybe it's just has a mask on all the time and that's what he was just he's born a character and i think that's probably more the case than anything but i do think that rfk jr has the perfect the only person that had the ability to potentially unite our nation.
He had a ton of popularity among Republicans. He had a ton of popularity among Democrats, like true Democrats, not the far left that we see in today's politics. His speech was amazing. It was unbelievable. 80 percent of it was about corruption in the health, that we need to the health issues we need to address in our country today.
And he had tears running from his eyes by the end of it, because he's truly a good person. And he truly understands the weight of what this election will bring. And it would be terribly sad to see another eight years go by without RFK. holding some very, very prominent position in office because he is one of the only real politicians that we've come across in the last 30 years.
So this goes on to say that Kennedy, the scion of one of the most country's famous democratic political dynasties, got a roar of approval from Republicans when he joined Trump on stage at the Republican campaign rally in Glendale. Bobby, Bobby, the crowd chanted. Kennedy had announced earlier that he's suspending his campaign.
Da, la, la, la, la. Now, the hope would be that Kennedy would be put in charge of, here's my hope, I hope Robert F. Kennedy Jr. gets put in charge of the CIA, because that would be the ultimate hope. Fuck you, from his family, back to the people that planned his assassination. That would be absolute justice, and I hope he would clean it up, or obliterate it, shatter it into the wind into a thousand pieces, like his uncle said that they should.
Now, more realistically, he could find himself a part of the, um, the health administrations, including the, overseeing the WHO, the NIH, well not the WHO, but the NIH, um, and all of the, uh, Uh, the FCC, uh, overseeing children's food in school systems, uh, being able to ban the dyes that are permeating all of our food, see the oils that he talks about constantly, like this man is the epitome, he's 70 years old, and he's jacked, super healthy guy, is outside all the time, he would be amazing in that position, and he truly, truly cares.
Which is all you can ask for in today's modern political environment. Just don't be fake. Don't be fake. Don't be corrupt. Don't be evil. Like I think these are pretty basic things, but it's very, very hard to come by in today's modern political environment. Name three people that you can think of that are like true.
Now, one of those other people that come to mind would be Tulsi Gabbard. Another Democrat that I would have considered a great pick for VP. Um, I think a lot of Republicans tend to agree with that statement. But Tulsi Gabbard would be a phenomenal pick for VP. I really wish he would have picked her over Vance.
I don't have any affinity for Vance, I don't have any malice either, but I just, I don't see him as a very excitable character to the general public. I think Tulsi would have been a huge, huge win for Trump's campaign. Uh, but anyways, Tulsi Gabbard has now come out and endorsed Donald Trump. So the two most likeable, most Politicians in the Democratic Party are now backing Donald Trump.
And I think those are the two biggest people that he could have got to back him. Like what's next, Bernie Sanders? Like that's about all that's left to endorse Trump for him to completely, uh, obliterate the Democratic Party. Now, one thing that came out of this is that the Biden Harris administration had revoked the secret service protection of Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. So immediately following RFK endorsing Trump, Biden and Harris pulled RFK's Secret Service. Detail that was protecting him from the multiple assassination attempts that have happened on his life over the last few months, you know, like weeks after actually giving it to him. Um, now to be fair, even though Biden pulled his security detail, I think at this point, if I had the money, I would probably buy my own security detail.
If I was Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Because after the horrible comedy that was watching Donald Trump almost get assassinated under the protection of the secret service. Maybe that's not the bodyguard that you truly want if people are actually trying to kill you. So there's that. Now here's Tulsi Gabbard endorsing Donald Trump.
Go ahead and pull that up for you. Uh, this comes from the post millennial. Uh, it says on Monday, speaking at the National Guard Association alongside 2024 GOP presidential candidate, Donald Trump, former democratic house Republican or house representative Tulsi Gabbard announced her endorsement of Trump.
Now this makes it even better. The fact that Tulsi Gabbard. Endorsed. Donald Trump is so much sweeter when you understand that she was the one who completely obliterated, just destroyed Kamala Harris on stage to where you never saw her again after Tulsi Gabbard went after her in the debates, and here it is.
Let's watch it. So, I mean, what I say when I share with you that I know that President Trump understands the grave responsibility that a president and commander in Chief Bears for every single one of our lives. Whether you're a soldier, you're an airman, a marine, sailor, or a coastie, he keeps us in his heart in the decisions that he makes.
We saw this through his first term in the presidency, when he not only didn't start any new wars, he took action to de escalate and prevent wars. He exercised the courage that we expect from our Commander in Chief. In exhausting all measures of diplomacy, having the courage to meet with adversaries, dictators, allies, and partners alike in the pursuit of peace, seeing war as a last resort.
The truth is, as we head towards our decision as a country in November, the same cannot be said about Kamala Harris. In fact, the opposite is true. And we're living through this reality today as. This administration has us facing multiple wars on multiple fronts and regions around the world, and closer to the brink of nuclear war than we ever have been before.
This is one of the main reasons why I'm committed to doing all that I can to send President Trump back to the White House where he can once again serve us as our commander in chief.
And there you go. Tulsi Gabbard has endorsed Donald, uh, said, uh, go ahead and just read a purse short part of this here. Um, this is personal for me. She said recounting her experiences in Iraq in 2005 with the Hawaii army national guard and how there was a sadness as we boarded the plane when we left.
That we were leaving some of our brothers and sisters behind only to lose others. When we got home to suicide,
uh, she said, I am proud to stand here before you today, whether you're a Democrat, Republican, or an independent, if you love your country, as I do, if you cherish peace and freedom as we do, I invite you to join me in doing all that we can to save our country and elect. Donald Trump. There you go. So two people that I actually think hold weight with their audience.
Tulsi Gabbard. Uh, And I think to me, she's probably one of the only, like, it's funny that the two Democrats that I would actually consider voting for that I actually think has any real personality to them that is actually speaking from their heart and is actually being a, a real true American just so happen to be the people that endorse Trump.
Now, I don't think that's any coincidence because everybody else is just paid off or disingenuous or there for a power grab or whatever it is. So let's move on. Now, you, I don't even know how to start this because it's so ridiculous to me. Do you know what's listed as the number like 43 top sold hat on Amazon?
You want to talk about propaganda when it comes to Kamala Harris, like they've made her this absolute star. Now this just shows exactly how ridiculous the propaganda is and how fake. This shows exactly how fake Kamala Harris's entire popularity is. Go to Amazon right now. Look at the top 100 hats that have been sold in the last month.
And it doesn't have to be what's been sold, obviously, as you'll see here in just a second. But when you look at the top 100 hats sold on Amazon right now, one of them that comes up is this hat right here. Here you go. Now, if you can't see my screen right now, it's a Harris Walls 2024 hat. Now this is listed as the number one new release hat on Amazon, which is funny because there's only one rating on this hat, one five star review on this hat, and it's the number one new released men's baseball hat.
One star, huh? That's weird. Almost as fake as the people that were on the tarmac when Kamala Harris got out of her airplane. Now you want to know why this is interesting is because somebody else I know so happens to have a newly released hat on Amazon. If you go to number one released on men's baseball hats, you will see.
That the number one hat is Harris. Well, this is the entire number one released. Amazon hot new releases of baseball hats. Number one, Kamala Harris walls. Number two, Kamala. Number four, Kamala. Number five, Kamala. Number six, Kamala. Number seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, nineteen, twenty, twenty one, twenty two, twenty three, twenty four.
You're telling me, on Amazon, out of the top 22 hats released in the last month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18
of the top 22 hats on Amazon in the new releases are all about Kamala Harris? Especially when you see that of those 18 hats that are in the top releases of hats, there's a total combined
eight stars that have been, that have been given to these hats. Eight total purchases verified on Amazon for the top 18 of 22 hats on Amazon. 18 out of the top 22 hats on Amazon right now of the new releases are Kamala Harris, and they have a total combined purchased of. Eight total purchases. Now you want to know why I know that's bullshit?
Because guess what? I own a hat company called Ronin that just released on the same timeframe as these and my hats have more reviews and more purchases than every single one of these hats. Every single one of them. My hats aren't listed on this top 100 list, but guess what? 35 different variations of Kamala Harris on the hat.
Are the top new releases for men's baseball hats. That's interesting to me. Hilarious actually. And what's even funnier is that the number three, you know, of the top 10 on here, nine of them are for Kamala Harris, but the one that's make America great again for Donald Trump has 28 reviews while the Kamala Harris ones have a combined.
Like 11, 10 reviews. So the number three has 28 times more reviews than any of the other ones. But it's number three compared to number one is Harris Walls. Especially when you see that the Harris Walls hats are like camouflage. Like, I'm sorry, nobody's buying a camo Harris Walls hat. Nobody. Hilarious. So.
If you want to buy a real hat and support a real company with real values, you can actually go to Amazon right now and you can look at it on your screen. If you're here on, uh, on YouTube with us, and here is my hat. You can look up Ronan Faraday hat. It will be the number one thing that comes up. It's a black hat that is a silver lined fabric, EMF blocking Now it's also just so happens to be the best looking hat on Amazon right now as well.
But my hat has more stars than the number 1, number 2, number 4, number 5, number 6, number 7, number 8. More purchases, guaranteed, than all of those Harris Kamala hats. Uh, Kamala Harris hats that are on Amazon right now. But for some reason, we don't show up on that list. Now that's interesting, very interesting.
So if you want to protect yourself from EMFs, you want to give the middle finger to Kamala Harris and the propaganda arm that is Amazon trying to push this type of merchandise onto the general public. Like they're not only doing it with Amazon. AI generated photos. They're not only propping up Kamala Harris by putting Beyonce songs and Taylor Swift behind her and all of these fake propaganda videos where you see her in in what looks like packed arenas that are there for her with all these signs.
No, they're there for the entertainment that they paid tens. millions of dollars to even show up there because they know that's the only way anybody's going to show up to their campaign. So if you're sick of the tomfoolery and you want to support a real brand go to amazon right now and buy one of my hats.
Ronin, Faraday hats on amazon. And while you're there leave a review so you can let them know too That we have way more people buying our stuff than Kamala Harris does. Alright, anyways, let's move on. But, let me tell you how infuriating that is. It is infuriating if you know how much time, how much energy, how much effort has gone into me launching my hat company and then realizing all I needed to do was make a Kamala hat.
And everybody would flock to buy it, but nobody would review it. And it would also be in the number one new released hats. All I had to do is put, maybe I should, should I put Kamala's name on my Ronin hats, just so that Amazon would put it to the top of the new releases. Do you think it would work? Maybe, maybe I will just kidding.
I would definitely not do that. I promise. I would never do that. All right. Last topic of the day, uh, is the fact that there was a U S soldier, uh, Here it is. U. S. soldier, a United States soldier fled to North Korea, fled to North Korea, and will plead guilty to desertion and other criminal charges. Now, the reason that he fled to North Korea will shock you.
If you know anything about North Korea, it will rattle you. Now, here we go. Here's the first article. I believe this one came out. Well, let's, let's, let's start from the beginning. Let's start from the beginning, August 17th, uh, August 15th, sorry, Pentagon disputes Pyongyang's acclaim. So, so North Korea claims that this U.
S. soldier fled to them because he sought refuge in North Korea from the United States. Now, that's really interesting when you understand that all the people, all of the people, Who are defectors of North Korea, say that it's the worst place possible. Now, number one, how did this guy get into North Korea?
Because the border is supposed to be like, shoot on sight, essentially. Number two, why would he think that that's a safer place than, I don't know, the United States of America? Interesting. Let's go ahead and read this article. Says the Pentagon cannot verify claims by North Korea that U. S. soldier Travis T.
King willingly sought refuge in the North to escape racial discrimination in the U. S. Army. So this kid fled the army, this soldier fled the army to North Korea because of discrimination. That's how soft our military members are today. That's how soft they are. They think that they're being discriminated against in the military, which, by the way, really doesn't happen.
When you're in the military, I'm a veteran, when you're in the military, literally nobody acknowledges color. Like, nobody. That you're all in it together when you're in boot camp, when you're in tech school, when you're deployed, when you're on base together, when you're all hanging out, it is a big, huge, like melting pot of people is the least discriminatory culture that you'll ever find in your entire life.
Like everybody's just. It's a brotherhood. Nobody cares what color you are. Nobody cares where you came from, what ethnicity you are, what your, your history is, is, growing up, where, like, nobody cares about any of that stuff. You're there for a mission, and you do that mission. That's all you care about. So, the Pentagon says it cannot verify claims by North Korea that the U.
S. soldier Travis T. King willingly sought refuge in North Korea to escape North Korea. Racial discrimination in the U. S. Army, a senior defensive, by the way, there's probably a big list of places that if you were actually trying to flee the U. S. Army from discrimination, Yeah, probably not going to North Korea.
Like, there's a lot of places that I would go first before I fled to North Korea. Unless, this man knows something that we don't know, which brings us to our next topic of North Korea as a utopia. Which we will get to in a minute. Um, King dashed into the North while on a civilian tour of the Joint Security Area on the heavily fortified border between North Koreas.
Or to the Koreas, US officials have said they believe King crossed the border intentionally in the first public acknowledgement of the incident. North Korea State media reported Wednesday that Kings confessed to crossing in the North Korea because of inhumane maltreatment and racial discrimination within the US Army.
Now there's a lot of dumb guys in the army. . I was in the Air Force, so I can say that there's a lot of dumb guys in the army. That's the running joke, at least. But you have to be the dumbest guy in the army if you flee to North Korea because of racial discrimination. Like, I'm sorry, you're literally the only black person in this entire country.
You're probably going to get way more discriminated against than the military, which is like 40%, 30 percent black. It says, North Korea investigators have also now concluded that King crossed deliberately and illegally with the intent to stay in North Korea or in a third country state news agency. K C N A set.
During the investigation, Travis King confessed that he had decided to come over as he harbored ill feelings against his inhumane maltreatment and racial discrimination within the U. S. Army. And by the way, if you feel that way in the Army, like, you're going to the legal council. Like, there's so many ways that you can bring that to your, you can go talk to your first shirt.
You can, there's, there's so many channels for you to, like, I understand if you're at a, uh, you Small company and you don't like the HR isn't existent and it's a mom and pop shop and you're like, fuck you guys I'm leaving and you run across the street to a you know, a different company to file an application But like you're in the military that the the HR in the military is like the worst to deal with ever like you're gonna You're gonna get fired Get places every single person will get written up so quick, especially in today's modern social media.
Uh, he also expressed his willingness to seek refuge in DPRK or a third country saying that he was disillusioned as at the unequal American society. The senior defense official who spoke with Fox News said North Korea has not communicated anything about Private King to U. N. command and anyone in the U.
S. military. The official said there is no reason to trust what North Korea's state media is reporting. The reclusive communist regime, which frequently issues, uh, bellicose threats against the United States, South Korea, and Japan exerts total control over its media. Okay. So there's the first article. The second article.
This one came, uh, Just two days ago says that the mother of Travis King says he has so many reasons to come home from North Korea The mother of the American soldier Travis King who spent more than a month inside North Korea says he has so many reasons to come home Claudine Gates made the comments to the Associated Press, uh, that they're continuing to work to bring the 23 year old son back to American soil after he ran into North Korea on Julythis is the craziest story ever that he ran into North Korea, uh, and stayed there for a month.
Because of racial discrimination in the military. I just can't see him ever wanting to stay in Korea when he has family in America. He has so many reasons to come home. I'm not mad at you, Travis. I just want you to come home, she added. He has a whole life ahead of him. He's still a young man. I just want my baby home.
Come back from North Korea, King.
The Pentagon said last week that it could not verify claims by North Korea that King, a U. S. Army private, willingly sought refuge in the North to escape racial discrimination within the service branch's rank. A senior defense official told Fox News on August 15th that the Pentagon had no contact with King and does not know his current condition.
In the first public acknowledgment of the incident, North Korea's state media reported that King confessed to crossing in the North because of inhumane maltreatment and racial discrimination in the U. S. Army. Wow. That. Is. Huh. Larious. He just bolted. He just ran. He's like, fuck you guys. I'm out. Uh, all right.
That's gotta be one of the funniest stories in American military history. During the investigation, King confessed that he had decided to come over to the DPRK as he harbored ill feeling. Okay. We walked through all this kind of similar as the last one. Um, Gates in an interview with the AP said he, she has never heard her son express the sentiments attributed to him.
Uh, that's why my son was proud to be an American. He's not even a racist type of. person. That's why I can't see him saying that, she said. But she added, I was kind of told that he said a little something like that to his uncles and that their approach with him was a little different than me. I'm mom. Wow.
Uh, that's hilarious. Uh, yeah, that's hilarious. Um, all right. And the last article here, This one coming from just today says that the US soldier who fled to North Korea will plead guilty to desertion. Other criminal charges, lawyers saying, uh, Travis King, the U S army private who last year, last year, how has he been detained this whole time?
But those articles were from like,
was that 2023? This guy has been gone for a year. No way. Yeah, those articles were August 24. I thought this was like three days ago, seven days ago, a week and a half ago. Why has nobody talked about this army soldier fleeing to North Korea because of racial discrimination, North Korea for a whole year.
Nobody's talked about this. This is I've never heard of this. And I was running my podcast. Then for the past three, four years, nobody's talked about this at all. That's hilarious. A whole year. How long was he in Korea for? Let's read this article and find out. I'm so sorry for this. I should have read further.
I so sorry. I should have looked at that. I just said August 15th, August 24th, August 26th. I just thought this was this like breaking story that nobody was talking about. This has been happening for a year. Oh my gosh. All right. August 26th, this is, this is the actual new breaking update for you guys. So Travis King, the U S army private who last year ran into North Korea from South Korea is expected to plead guilty to multiple criminal charges, including desertion.
The U S army has charged him with 14 offenses under the uniform code of military justice. King will plead guilty to five of those charges and not guilty to the remaining offenses. which the army intends to dismiss. King's guilty plea will be entered at a general court martial where he will explain his actions to military judge.
Uh, the guilty plea and sentencing will be held on September 20th. Mark your calendar. Travis is grateful to his friends and family who have supported him and to all who outside the circle who did not prejudge his case based on the initial allegations.
North Korean government released King last September 18th. So he served like two months. When he reportedly sprinted away from a tour group in a demilitarized zone, there was no contact with King during his capture and North Korean officials were initially obtuse in responding to U. S. inquiries. The incident happened after King finished two months in a South Korean detention facility following a physical altercation with locals.
A senior defense official previously told Fox News. Wow. So he got like a fist fight with some South Korean dudes and then ran to North Korea because they were being unfair to him. Cause he's black. Allegedly throughout the time he was in the facility, he made comments that he did not want to come back to America.
King was eventually released on July 10th and sent home Monday to Fort Bliss.
Um, so let's read that again. Uh, he finished two months in a South Korean detention facility for getting in a fight with a local. Uh, throughout the time he was at the facility, he made comments that he did not want to come back to America. King was eventually released on July 10th and sent home Monday to Fort Bliss.
So, he was in that detention facility. That timeline doesn't match up. But anyways, uh, North Korea state media reported that King confessed to crossing into the country because of inhumane. Okay, we talked about that. King's mother disputed the claims. And there we are. September 20th, people. That's what we're going to find out.
Uh, Somebody says, I wonder if this entire problem can be attributed to the lower standards for enlistment that all military branches but the Marines have resorted to in order to reach their recruiting goals. It just seems unlikely that this is the first time this individual has been involved in trouble.
Yeah, possibly. Uh, somebody said, I would have no problem if he's sent back to North Korea. This is where he wanted to go. Yeah, have fun, bud. Uh, it says in 1983, Private First Class White defects guard duty to the demilitarized zone in North Korea. And North Korea used him to As propaganda. Three months later, his body was found floating in a river south of North Korea.
King IL Sung said he was overwhelmed, uh, and loved the support to the North Korean people couldn't meet standards. Wow, you misunderstand. Even North Korea didn't want him. They gave him back freely. Uh, yeah. Shouldn't he be invited to the White House and given a beer with Harris ? Uh. Yeah, very interesting.
That's crazy. So here's a fun thought experiment. What if he's right? What if North Korea is not this like, desolate, dystopian place where everybody's being like, totalitarianism to the core?
What if North Korea is hiding a secret utopia? Where the elite live in luxury, fueled by trillions in untapped resources. What And that's what some people tend to believe. I don't know if I agree with them. But that is what some people believe is that what if North Korea was really this huge propaganda campaign by the West.
And what if really what's happening there is actually utopia, where Kim Jong Un actually doesn't defecate, where they have far advanced technology than us. Where they have unlimited resources, none of them really have to work in this communist, socialist, totalitarian regime, and everybody's happy about it.
What if all the defectors there It's hard to say this seriously, but like, think about it. Let's, like, let's, okay, let me, let me put on my serious hat here. Here, here's the argument that can be made around this, alright?
There's actually a legitimate argument to be made that North Korea has an unbelievable amount of resources. North Korea is believed to be sitting on untapped natural resources potentially worth trillions of dollars, including vast resources of rare earth materials, including coal, gold, and many other minerals.
These resources, resources could theoretically provide the economic foundation for a prosperous society, particularly if the government has been discreet, discreetly. Uh, exploiting these assets. Now, there's supporting evidence surrounding this, which is the fact that North Korea is estimated to be one of the largest reserves of rare earth elements in the world, which are critical for modern technology, from smartphones to military equipment.
Uh, reports suggest that these resources could be worth six to ten trillion dollars. Given North Korea's isolation and the secrecy surrounding its economic activities, it's plausible that the regime has been strategically using these resources to maintain a hidden wealth based economy. fueling a more prosperous society than outsiders are aware of, right?
Like what if North Korea is just like the real life Wakanda, where everybody thinks it's like this third world country. And it's actually this utopia with flying cars, and unlimited resources, and people are all super happy. And they have, you know, all of these things that we don't know about all this technology, all of these minerals, all these resources, all of this advanced modern societies, like, What if Wakanda is real?
And it's actually North Korea. That's the question I'm posing to you. Uh, now another side of this is that there's actually legitimate, uh, legitimate evidence that shows that North Korea is known for its extensive network of underground facilities. Like huge, massive, underground military cities. Not just military bunkers, but cities.
Designed to protect and sustain its elite. The underground cities might be equipped with advanced technology Luxurious living conditions, but like nobody knows this right you go into North Korea Like you're getting a tour guide who's gonna walk you through these like fake cities. Have you ever seen those videos?
Like nobody knows what's going on there legitimately The only thing that we know is the propaganda that's being propagated by Kim Jong un which looks more satirical than anything at all That you've ever seen like any video that is of Kim Jong un. It looks like a comedy like a legitimate comedy Um, so like what's actually going on there?
Is it really just this like comical? satirical country where this totalitarian brutal regime of or is it like Or are they hiding something? Like, I think both of those are just as plausible as each other. Uh, it says there's multiple reports and defector testimonies that describe vast underground networks in North Korea, initially built for military purposes.
Satellite imagery has also revealed suspicious land formations and construction activities that hint at larger underground facilities. Now, if you recall, I've done a deep dive into the DUMS. The deep underground military bases that are under, uh, the United States of America, like huge, unbelievably huge, vast, like cities, infrastructures, military bases underground that nobody, unless you're in there and have the secret security clearances know about.
And we found out about them because there was, uh, Strava data. Strava is like the, the, or was it like my fitness, um, like the whoop app, whatever that is, the my fitness pal type of a thing that you put on your, your, I think of Strava, Strava data got leaked and it's this running technology where runners put this like on their shoes or it's on your phone app and it tracks where you run and people, the data got leaked from Strava.
And when it got leaked, they saw these. Uh, there was like hundreds of people running this track in the middle of nowhere, and I think it was like Antarctica or something. And what they found was a deep underground military base where these military members were tracking their runs in the deep underground military base.
So these things exist. The data's been leaked. The US has these. They're huge, like massive cities under the ground. So who's to say that North Korea doesn't have that too? I mean, there's a lot of evidence that suggests the same. Um, right, designed, and so it talks about the land formations and construction activities that hint at large underground military bases.
Uh, secrecy and controlled information. The secret, the extreme secrecy and control over information in North Korea allow the regime to maintain a dual reality. While the global community sees a nation plagued by poverty and repression, There could be a totally different reality that's going on there. Um, North Korea's tight control over media and information, both domestically and internationally, is well documented.
The regime's ability to obscure much of its military and economic activities from even the most advanced civilization, or intelligence services, suggests that it could be just concealing the truth. Aspects of its social infrastructure This is supported by the fact that there is very little known about the true extent of north korea's internal developments And the country's isolation means that much of what is known comes from the controlled sources either being the news The defectors right which could very easily be Uh, people who are paid actors, just like we've had, you know, crisis actors here in the U.
S. Um, and then it goes on to talk about how there's plenty of suggestselective Western propaganda. So proponents argue that Western mediaand this is all like a pro article designed to at least give some evidence of this, so it's like, just Being transparent with you. This is not like some legitimate government resource or some scientific article, but it is giving legitimate points about this.
So, but it is in support of this idea of the North Korea utopia. Um, but it says by depicting the country as a failed state, Western powers can justify sanctions, military posturing, and political pressure. This narrative could be deliberately exaggerated or even fabricated, masking the true nature of North Korean society.
And then it also talks about how there is inconsistent defector testimony. So while many defectors report dire conditions in North Korea, there have been cases where their testimonies have been questioned or even debunked. Some defectors have returned to North Korea, which, which proponents argue wouldn't happen if the country was in terrible as terrible as depicted, right?
Why would you go back there if like, and there's some horrible videos like, and I'm not meaning like to having this conversation to like downplay those defectors testimonies? Because, um, who is the, there was the woman that was on. She goes on and talks about some like horrific, horrific things that are going on there and like all these terrible, the terrible famines that are happening.
Like I'm not trying to delegitimize that and like, but it's an interesting concept, right? When, when everything has been shown to be false and propaganda, like you start to question some weird stuff, guys. This may be one of those cases. Um, but I'm sure that my, my bullshit radar is like pretty well up here.
I, I'm not totally buying this theory, but it's a fun thought experiment that North Korea's Wakanda. That's all I'm saying. And that is a good fair point that like, why would a defector go back there? Right. Unless their family's being threatened. Maybe like that. That'd be a good reason. Um, this suggests that life in North Korea might be in more nuanced with certain segments of the population living in better conditions than the Western media portrays.
Yeah. Interesting. Not sure what I make of that, guys, but that's at least, that's at least the theory for you. Now you know. The theory surrounding North Korea being an actual utopia, Wakanda, and us just being propagandized by the Western culture to think that maybe you don't want to be like those guys.
Like, you want to, you want to stay with your democracy and your freedom of speech. Don't come over here to the dark side where, where, you know, we have the worst haircuts ever and satirical movies that we push out as propaganda to outside countries so they don't know that we have access to trillions of dollars of resources and advanced technology.
I don't know. I mean, I kind of know, but I don't know. And with that. I'll leave you guys. So I hope you have a wonderful day. Head over to Ronan basics. com. Um, head over to Amazon. You can buy our hats there as well. I have the Ronan basics RFID blocking wallets. Um, have the Ronan basics, uh, 10 foil hat, protecting yourself from EMFs.
And the beanies coming very, very soon is our Faraday bags. So the phone, phone bags that you'll actually be able to put your phone into. I have many, many samples. I have, they're in production right now. We've gone back and forth and back and forth to improve them. Very, very excited. I should have those in stock over the next coming weeks.
So look out for that Ronan basics. com subscribe, leave a five star review here. Uh, and. I love you. I appreciate you. I hope you're having a good day and I'll see you next time. The Adams archive. Adams archive.
-
Welcome to The Adams Archive, the podcast where we unravel the narratives behind today’s most pressing events. Hosted by Austin Adams, we dive deep into the stories that the media, government, and corporations don’t want you to hear. From political scandals to global conspiracies and health risks, we bring you the unfiltered truth in an era of widespread misinformation.
Summary: Each episode of The Adams Archive explores the hidden truths behind current events. Whether we’re exposing political scandals, investigating global conspiracies, or discussing health crises, our goal is to provide you with the insights needed to see through the headlines and understand the bigger picture.
Political Scandals: We uncover the corruption and deception that often go unnoticed in political circles. From questionable decisions within the Secret Service to AI-generated crowds at rallies, we delve into how these manipulations affect public trust and democracy.
Global Conspiracies: We investigate events that challenge official narratives, such as mysterious plane crashes involving key figures and the controversial rise of mRNA technology. These episodes explore the connections between global elites and the incidents they don’t want you to question.
Health Risks: Our discussions focus on the real dangers posed by modern health crises. We examine the suppression of whistleblowers, the rise of turbo cancers, and the global health emergencies that may be more about control than public safety.
Stay informed and empowered by subscribing to The Adams Archive on your favorite podcast platform. Follow us on YouTube for exclusive content, and join our Substack and social media communities to engage with like-minded listeners. Your support is crucial in spreading the truth—together, we can challenge the narrative and make our voices heard.
All the Links:For easy access to all our content and platforms, visit https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
Full Transcription:
Adam's Archive. Hello, you beautiful people, and welcome to The Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we're going to be catching up to speed on a few different things that have come up over the past couple of weeks, and one of those being that the Secret Service is now doing an investigation After an agent reportedly abandoned their post to breastfeed during a North Carolina Trump event.
Kind of weird timing, especially given the fact that the same secret service had some, I don't know, questionable decision making as some might call it recently with specifically Donald Trump. So we'll talk about that. After that, we'll jump into the reflections on a plane during Kamala Harris's off boarding, uh, during an event, in which case there was Hundreds, maybe some would say even thousands of people that were in the crowd, but were they So we'll talk about that espn also fired sam ponder who spoke up about the trans inclusion in women's sports And analyst robert griffin the third so we'll talk about maybe why that might be Then moving on we'll talk about the recent plane crash In Sao Paulo, Brazil, where there's allegedly some shenanigans.
And by that meaning several doctors that were killed in this plane crash that had vowed to release evidence linking to the MRNA gene therapy. All right. Following that, we'll talk about the authorities seeking the public's health and identifying suspects in a potential serial killer. I thought that only happened on Netflix.
And last but not least, we will discuss the new potential health emergency that has been declared by the who who the who the same who not the band, the band's pretty good. But the same who that had declared an emergency about COVID. Should you be concerned? We'll talk about it. All right, all of that more, make sure you stick around.
But first, go ahead and hit that subscribe button. Leave a five star review. And that's most of what I got for you. I would like to say, first of all, if you are watching on YouTube, you'll notice the reason for the break the last week and a half, two weeks of going without an episode is that I completely redid my studio.
I thought it was a little bit of an update from the, the grass. Grassy background that was was behind me. It seemed a little bit, uh, outdated 2000 and one back when we started the podcast. So I thought it was time to do an update. And it took a little bit more time than I expected. But I hope you all enjoy it.
I hope you like it. So make sure you head over to YouTube, subscribe there. And last but not least, I don't know if you know this, you probably do. But I have launched Ronin. Ronin is my Faraday Goods company. You can check it out right now by going to roninbasics. com and you will see all sorts of Faraday Goods.
And if you don't know what Faraday Goods are, they're, uh, basically a, a fabric based, uh, material that allows us to block all inbound and outbound signals, including that, which would help you to mitigate the effects and harmful effects of EMF radiation, as well as utilizing it in phone cases here. for listening.
Which you can slip your phone in and completely eliminate your digital footprint, stop all inbound and outbound signals from your phone, develop your own digital hygiene routine in a world that is surrounded by digital threats. So, head over to RonanBasics. com, we'll talk a little bit about that because I've done a ton, a ton of research, even more recently, come across some crazy, crazy things that I've talked about.
So, go check it out, RonanBasics. com. We even have an EMF quiz that you can check out where it will create a customized analysis of your own risk exposure. So if you want that head over to Instagram, I'll send it there. We'll also be setting it up on the website here very, very shortly. Ronan basics. com. Go check it out.
You can get a Faraday hat, which is exactly the baseball hat. That's on my head that is lined with silver lined fabric, beanies, RFID, blocking wallets. And in the coming weeks, we will have. Very, very similar. This is one of the samples that I had made, uh, with the manufacturers that I'm working alongside of.
Um, but I made them even better than that one right there. So I'm not going to launch it just yet. So Ronan basics. com subscribe, leave a five star review and without further ado. So, Mr. Dr. Seuss, let's jump into it.
The Addams Archive
All right. So very recently, you might have heard the term secret service a little bit more often than you're used to. One of those situations being Maybe the attempted assassination on the president and all of the technical Strategic breakdowns that happened by the secret service But now they're in the headlines again The secret service is now in the headlines again because they are investigating an agent who reportedly abandoned their post at nothing more than a Trump rally just one month following the attempted assassination.
It seems like a questionable decision making happening in the Secret Service. So let's go ahead and take a look. This article comes from the Post Millennial and it says that the Secret Service is investigating after a female agent reportedly abandoned her post to breastfeed her baby during Donald Trump's campaign rally in North Carolina on Wednesday.
Several sources familiar with the matter
That has to be my, my favorite, uh, my favorite statement by these news articles is several sources familiar with the matter. Who? Who are these people? How, how are they any more familiar than you or I? And what gives them the right to be the person that you cite? And, and when you're citing something, aren't you supposed to say who they are?
Like, several sources familiar with the matter. That literally tells me nothing. You could pull that from thin air. They could completely not exist. Anyways, several sources familiar with the matter told real, clear politics reporter, Suzanne Crabtree. Okay. Sources told Crabtree that the agent did not provide notice about the situation.
This comes after the secret service came under fire for its security failures during Trump's rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, which resulted in an assassination attempt on the now GOP nominee. Interesting. Now it says that in the lead up to the North Carolina rally, the USS site agent who is responsible for the security of the event.
So this is not just any old agent. This is the person responsible for the security, like, Okay, maybe you should pay attention. Was preparing for the arrival of Trump's motorcade. The site agent conducted the final sweep of the walking route and discovered the agent breastfeeding her child in the room that is designated for essential secret service, official work, such as a potential emergency.
Okay, so I was wrong. Uh, I guess I should wait a minute before I make statements. Um, wasn't the individual, it was the person doing the final sweep, but they, they were walking down wherever they were walking. Found this woman breastfeeding her child and decided that maybe we shouldn't be doing that at a time where, I don't know, we're just minutes away from Donald Trump going out and potentially having a similar situation as to what happened last time.
It says that it is prohibited for a working agent on duty for a protective assignment to bring a child with them. Makes sense. She also reported, uh, Reportedly brought two additional family members who were present in the room with her when she was found breastfeeding her baby. The female agent works for the Atlanta field office as reported by Crabtree.
The agent and her family members were reportedly escorted into the room by event staff who had not received security clearance after bypassing the uniform division checkpoint. Okay. That seems to be the gist of it. Won't bore you with the rest of it. Um, but, Yes. Here's what I would think about that.
Maybe now's not the time to be bringing in your family members and maybe you're not in the exact. workplace environment where you should be doing that. Now, I am a big proponent of both breasts and feeding, uh, particularly breastfeeding. I think it's one of the most amazing things in the world. It's incredible that a woman's body has the capabilities to provide life to a child.
I have three children myself, all of which were breastfed by my beautiful wife. And I would not want to do anything to prevent a woman from being able to breastfeed your child. That is how they live. You shouldn't have to provide your child with bullshit formula. Because they're riddled with the most carcinogenic materials you could ever imagine.
There's some ways to get around that, though. You can breast pump, you can use a breast pump, and you can create an excess, which you put into the freezer and then give your child with a warmer. There's a lot of ways that this could have not happened, and I honestly don't think this would have ever made headlines had it not been just Weeks after Donald Trump had an assassination attempt, especially on the sensitive topic of female secret service officers, after the absolute clown show that happened on camera that everybody was talking about just a couple of, you know, a few weeks ago.
Uh, I'm sure you recall everything that happened there, so we won't have to go through that, but maybe not the time, maybe not the place. Maybe not the position that you should be holding if you're somebody who needs to immediately breastfeed your child now They're they're obviously I think in almost any situation any workplace any environment.
You should be able to Provide life to your child. I'm not somebody who's saying that Oh that woman should be in the kitchen or that woman should be at home with her child at all times No, I I get it. Maybe you have to pay rent. Maybe the father's not involved Maybe he doesn't make enough money in order to enable you to work from home I get it.
100%. I agree with you. Breastfeed your child. But maybe don't breastfeed that child at the event by having your family bypass security and also during a time where you're supposed to be in an active position of your duties. That's all I'm saying. I'm not going to shame this woman. And I saw several people actually shaming this woman online, uh, saying that maybe you don't belong and all the, like, no, you should be able to have, hold a position in breast for your child, but you should also have the cognitive awareness to make sure that you're not putting a life in danger, which is the entire purpose of your position is to provide safety.
To a specific individual in this case, Donald Trump, maybe not the time, maybe not the place. That's all I'm saying. I think there's probably a good way that this could have not happened, one being that maybe just get a breast pump. Deal with it like that. Your child deserves your beautiful, wonderful miracle of breast milk.
But maybe you shouldn't be doing that behind a gated area during a time where you're supposed to be protecting the president while also hosting people who should not be there at that time, one of those people including your child. Right? Maybe not the time, maybe not the place, maybe not the timeline that you should be doing this immediately after and following the most recent situation with Donald Trump.
That's all I'm going to say about that. I don't think there's too much to talk about there, but maybe you should have a little bit better decision making. Should this be huge headlines? Should so many people be talking about it? Probably not. Maybe if something happened to Trump, right? God forbid, but I just think.
Maybe there's some better decision making that could have happened here. That's all I'm gonna say. I'm not gonna condemn this woman. I get it, you should be feeding your child. I'm not gonna say you should be at home with your baby all the time, because I don't know your situation. But what I am saying is that better critical thinking probably could have prevented you from finding yourself in this situation.
Situation just two weeks after, you know, Cheadle resigned as a result of her incompetence, maybe isn't the time, right? You go through these ebbs and flows with work. Sometimes your feet are to the fire and you need to make sure you hit that vines. Sometimes your feet are to the fire and you need to make sure that publicly you don't look atrocious in a specific uniform that is designed to show that you are the person who's supposed to be protecting the president of the United States.
That's all that I am saying, right? Seems pretty straightforward. I don't know. I don't think there's too much to dive into besides that, but that's my statement on it. It was one of the biggest articles out there right now. So just wanted to touch on it. Now, next up, we're going to talk about Kamala Harris's campaign and specifically the use of AI.
Now, Kamala Harris was exiting her, her plane and this huge, massive, unbelievably ridiculously oversized airplane. Nonetheless, she was exiting this plane and people started to look at the picture because there was hundreds. Maybe thousands of people in this audience, especially in a time where they're trying to build up the, uh, build up the, the, the, the hype around Kamala Harris and make it look like she's, you know, everybody loves Kamala, right?
She deserves her own show. It shouldn't be everybody hates Chris. It should be everybody loves Kamala. That's what they're trying to make you seem. That's what they're trying to make it seem like right now. But people thought there was something fishy about this picture, right? A few things. Now, let's go ahead and take a look at this picture together, and we will discuss it.
Here we go. Here's the picture. You'll see Kamala coming out of her plane. Normal. Makes sense, right? She's just getting out of there. You'll see these thousands, hundreds, thousands of people in the audience. They're just like, That are holding their phones up, getting so excited for her being there. But there's something fishy about that.
Reflections. Reflections exist. And when you look at the reflections on this airplane, Specifically, some people are pointing to, like, the left side here. I'm not, that's not my concern. Where you can really see it is on the, the, the, you know, right over here on the right. Right, right on the jet. And what you see when you look at the reflection is an empty airport.
Empty. Where did those thousands of people go? Where did they go? What happened to them? Well, some people are speculating that maybe, just maybe, those people weren't actually there? Hmm. That would be really interesting, wouldn't it? Now, another thing that people were pointing to about this picture This very obviously AI edited photo, trying to make it seem that there's this hype that isn't there.
And there's other situations that they're doing this with right now that aren't just this one situation. But what other people are pointing to are the cell phones, the cell phones of the people that are holding up their phones here, where there's nothing on the screen. They're just black, right? If you hold up your cell phone, you should be seeing the scene in front of you.
But there's nothing on the screens of these people who are shooting video and a very, very Very daytime setting where you would be able to see the reflections of what's happening or at least the video footage from their phones. And it doesn't seem to be the case. You can't see anything. It's just all black, almost as if it was generated with AI.
And I think this is just the start of it, right? I think this is the very, very beginning of what is going to be an absolute Orwellian future in politics, where you cannot decipher what is real from what is fake. We don't even know if the votes were counted correctly, but now we can't even tell if the campaign photos that are being posted on Twitter are real.
If the hype around this person is real,
Kamala essentially bought followers, right? You see all those fake Instagram accounts where they buy followers. Kamala did this in real life, IRL, in real life. She bought these people and had them displayed at the very bottom of this image to make it appear as if people care about her campaign. Now, why would she have to do that?
Why wouldn't there be a massive crowd there? Well, maybe because she's not there very popular. Maybe because her, the, the, the Democrats nominee wasn't chosen by the people. Right? Maybe it's because she dropped out in like, Iowa last time she was a potential candidate for the presidency. Maybe it's because she got less than 1 percent of the popularity vote leading up to the primary just four years ago.
Maybe it's because another certain Hawaiian senator demolished her about her past history and followers and the things that she did while she was a DA. Just maybe, maybe that's what it's about, right? Maybe they're trying to seem more popular. Nobody talked about Kamala. Kamala didn't even show her face for four years.
This lady was hidden in the basement somewhere. If she was this popular, if Kamala Harris was this popular the entire time that she was a vice president, they would have been carting her around. She would have been carrying Biden over her shoulder, wheeling him around in a wheelchair, waving to the mass public, you know, openly displaying her love for all of her followers.
But she wasn't doing that and they weren't leveraging her that way. You want to know why? Because she's not popular. Nobody likes her policies. She's very unlikable. She can't speak for three minutes in front of a camera without becoming a meme. So when you look at this picture and you go, Oh my gosh, she's so popular.
No, she's not. And this is the lengths that they're willing to go to gaslight you. If we know nothing about the government, they are master gaslighters. And also, they're also terrible with Photoshop. And if they, if they AI edited this photo, just a week ago, they were being accused of AI generating Joe Biden's voice on a phone call.
And what's to say that they didn't do that then too. And this should be a complete validation of that if nothing else. And they're just rubbing it in your face. They think you're that stupid. They think you're that stupid to where they can just overlay some people in the audience, edit a few of these, the, the, the signs that they're holding up on Canva.
Forget to edit the, the, the, because it actually wouldn't have been too terribly difficult to actually edit in the people into the reflection. They are literally just that dumb. They're just that dumb. Let's see what some people had to say about this. It says a guy in the second photo. Oh, wow. Yeah, that's crazy.
As you start to look at some of these pictures, let's, let's go ahead and I'll share this one with you. Somebody in this photo is holding a Nintendo DS to take a picture of Kamala Harris. No way. They also have these really weird wrists. That's not how you hold a phone. Is it weird? Very weird. Let's see what else people have to say.
Uh, the next person says, Oh, you mean Mr. Three Hands? Yeah! I'm gonna share this photo with you guys one more time here. Not only is this person a part of Kamala Harris hype committee in front of her fake airplane photo holding a Nintendo DS, it looks like, in this photo, they also have three hands that they're using to hold this phone.
Weird. Very weird. That, that person needed that much help to hold that phone. Uh, that's pretty hilarious. Okay. Uh, when in the fucking world are there that many people allowed to be on the tarmac other than Afghanistan? Ooh, got him. Got him, got him, got him. Uh, Another thing was pointed out that there was a worker on the, uh, from this airport, uh, who had alleged that they do not let people there for this type of stuff.
Like there was nobody there that day. They worked that day. They stated that there wasn't people there on the tarmac. This never happened. It was quiet. There was nobody there at all. She walked off the plane, uh, with nobody, no crowd at all. No crowd at all.
Funny. Um,
It says what reputable news source posted this picture as proof of Walls Harris crowd size. Who is the sighted photographer and what agency do they work for without that information? This is just a picture that anyone even you could have manipulated for your own purposes and holds no weight. Now the next person says that oh, well the Guardian used this.
Hmm. Uh, Another person says, uh, yeah, so there's, there it is. Okay. Um, interesting, funny, who would have thought they would go to the lengths of this to try to convince you that she was popular. Now, let's talk about this. ESPN fired Sam Ponder. Sam Ponder was one of the individuals, and by one of the individuals, I mean the only individual from ESPN who called out this transgender BS.
And apparently, This woman was fired for it. It says Ponder didn't immediately. Let's see. The ESPN fired Samantha Ponder and Robert Griffin III on Thursday. The athletic first reported the shakeup and ESPN confirmed the news on Fox News Digital. Ponder was anchor on Sunday NFL Countdown and Griffin was an analyst who appeared on multiple shows.
Ponder didn't immediately comment on the decision. Griffin joked on X about getting fired on his day off using a clip from the show. From the movie Friday decision to fire pondir sparked most most of the outrage on social media Riley Gaines host of outkicks gains for girls podcast and former ESPN anchor sage steel were among those to defend pondir And this is what Riley Gaines had to say Says so ESPN fire Sam pondir the only woman at the network who was publicly accused of said, who has publicly said, that men don't belong in women's sports three weeks before football season.
Sam is one of the most beautiful, yes, she's very beautiful, genuine women I've ever met alongside Sage Steele, who had a similar fate, not a coincidence. Sage Steele came out with this video clip. So it's been a couple hours since I saw the news that ESPN decided to fire Samantha Ponder for cost cutting reasons.
You know what, I'm not going to even spend any time, waste any time talking about ESPN. I need to make sure that you all know who Samantha Ponder is. You've watched her for years and she's an incredible talent, but like that's the least important thing about her. This woman is so strong. I met her when we co hosted the Scripps National Spelling Bee in D.
C. like a hundred years ago and back then she was still Samantha Steele so we were like, oh yeah, we're twinsies. Sage Steele, Samantha Steele, we look exactly the same too. Um, and we've been connected to the hip ever since, mainly because of our similar values and our faith. Samantha has taught me so much about God, about Scripture, about the Bible, about not giving up and about standing tall.
And you know what? She's done that for the last several years at ESPN, even when it was hard, when I was still there, we talked about it all the time, and I just need everyone to know, this is a brilliant woman, an incredible mother, who has also made me a better mother, for sure, Sam, don't deny that, um, and I am so excited for her future, it's so scary when you're in a need, you don't think there's any way that you're gonna ever be okay, Sam already knows that this is such a blessing.
That God is bestowing upon her because there's so much more for her to do. And I'm just honored to call her a dear friend and so damn proud of what she's done and how she's done it this entire time. So this is another loss for ESPN. Um, but it is a gain for literally the rest of the world. Cause now you're going to see.
The true Sam Ponder. It's all gonna come out and I hope you're ready. She is a gem and I'm honored to call her a friend. I love you, girl. Now why would you see this true person, right? What would it be about working at ESPN that would make you be able to see the true person behind the on screen personality?
And that would be because when you work with these types of organizations, ESPN I'm pretty sure is owned by Disney. Who would have thought they would hire or fire somebody for having their own belief systems? Why, why, why would you see the real person? Well, because they, any person in a position that is owned by these gatekeepers, whether it be ESPN, whether it be high level movies and actors and musicians, and you know, it all comes down to, do you want to keep your job?
Do you because if you want to keep your job, you have to keep your mouth shut, especially if you're religious, especially if you're, uh, you know, somebody who has outspoken beliefs about the current indoctrination that's happening in our school systems, any one of those things, pick your poison, right? And speaking about this, the Olympic Games just ended.
The Olympic Games have come to a close. And I think we learned three valuable lessons from the Olympic Games. Number one being that the world will no longer tolerate. Women in men's sports, the world will no longer tolerate women in men's sports. Number two, the world will no longer tolerate the mocking of Christianity.
And religion in general, right? We saw that with the, uh, the, um, the opening ceremony, right? All of the, the religious mocking of Christianity, it would never happen with any other religion. No possibility whatsoever. Absolutely not would have never happened. Imagine if they put Allah up on that stage and started mocking or Muhammad, sorry, if they, if they had, uh, A whole, Opening ceremony mocking Muhammad.
Do you know what would have happened? And honestly, this speaks a little bit to to the the uh, I don't know what to how to position that the the fragility of Christians today Christianity Christians almost took over the world at one point guys Like, we have to remember our roots here. Christianity is not a faith of, of, of weak individuals who aren't outspoken about what they believe in, or, or why they believe in it, or are afraid of fighting back against people who mock their god, or their, their, you know, any one of the other religions that are out there, if Judaism was mocked publicly, if, name it.
Any other religion. Right? It would be a crazy outpour, even Buddhism, right? Even, uh, you know, any one of these other religions. If they were publicly mocked on a world stage, there would be huge outcry. But guess what? You know what you can be racist against? White people. You know who you can be sexist against?
Men. You know what religion you can make fun of openly without fear for repercussions? Christianity. That's the reality of today. But now we know. The Olympics apologized. They apologized because there was enough pushback. Religion will no longer be mocked. It's specifically Christianity is no longer on the table.
Will not be mocked. Women are not going to be allowed in the world stage to be competing against men. Men should not be allowed in the world stage competing against women, especially in combat sports. And number three. The United States is still the baddest motherfucking country in the world, bar none. We have the greatest athletes.
We have the greatest economy, regardless of what's been done and undone, and the burdens that can be seen, cannot be unburdened by what has been. We're the greatest country in the fucking world. We're the most athletic country. We have the biggest and most thriving economy. Our software development and technology in Silicon Valley is better than anywhere else in the world.
Our entrepreneurship and businesses are greater than anywhere else. Barna, no competition, right? I do think that we ended up tying with China in some way, somehow. But the last time I looked, we were up by like 30, 40 medals. That's what we learned from the Olympics. Alright, so ESPN fired her. We've seen this go south.
I don't know when these organizations are going to learn that this woke shit will no longer be tolerated. It won't be. We're not going to allow it. Right? You're going to fire her? You know what? There's a bigger organization out there with a bigger role for her somewhere that she's going to get as a result of this.
Her clout just got, went up five notches as a result of this, especially when you understand that a huge portion of the community, especially when you talk about the football season and football in general and in the type of people that follow those sports where the money comes from. Generally white, generally male, generally Christian, generally not wanting men to compete against women in combat sports.
That's the reality of it. Right? And so what makes sense about this? Well, it's like the Taylor Swift, Taylor Swiftification of ESPN and sports in general. You have to do the Colin Kaepernick's of the world are pumped up and, and the, you know, the, the, the white male Christian quarterbacks, right? thrown on tossed out of the sport onto their ass, and then have to go do speaking gigs to make money.
Right? It's crazy. But guess what the pendulum is swinging back. We know that we've seen it over and over again, whether it's the Bud Light campaigns, whether it's the Olympics, whether it's name it, it's happened. We have seen over and over and over again that this shit won't be tolerated anymore. And I am glad I'm proud of you guys for speaking out against this.
We have to continue it, right? We have to continue speaking out against the trans bullshit. We have to continue saying women aren't, or men shouldn't be allowed in women's sports. We have to continue speaking out and saying Christianity is not going to be mocked. We're winning the culture war right now, guys.
And they know it. They know it. They may own all of the news media outlets. But guess what? We own all of the free speech. We own all of the, almost all of the major podcasts are people speaking about these things in a, in a dissident way compared to what the large organizations out there are doing.
Because that's the truth that represents what the people think that's, if you have a long form content stream of thought, stream of consciousness conversation with most people, they're going to say that this shit is crazy. It doesn't make any sense. Women should not have to fist fight men in the Olympics.
Christianity should not be mocked on a world stage in front of everybody.
Very, very simple. Things to adhere to yet. They keep wanting to push it despite how much money they continue to lose All right, let's transition. Let's look at this here But before we do that One thing that I found out when I was doing some of my research in the EMFs I think this just a few days ago.
I'm reading a book by Dr. Robert Malone, I think that's who it is. I wrote a book called it EMFed. Maybe it's not Robert Malone. That's the, that's the, let's see. I believe that Robert Malone is the, um,
Dr. Mercola. That's his name. Let's see. Yeah. Dr. Mercola. The book is called EMFed by Dr. Joseph McCullough. Robert Malone's the guy who talked about mRNA, uh, gene therapies during COVID. Also a great individual to read and follow. But Dr. Joseph, uh, Mercola, you can get this book on Amazon right now. 4. 7 stars, 823 ratings packed full of information that you should know about modern technology, whether it's 5g, wifi, cell phones, and what, something that really stuck out to me.
And I just started reading this. I've been reading about 5g and wifi radiation, poisoning and EMS for a little bit of time now. But something that I didn't know was that if you go into your iPhone settings right now, you, you have an iPhone. If you're not driving. Pull your iPhone out, go to your settings, hit general, scroll all the way down to legal and regulatory.
And you're going to see that there's four buttons that you can press. One is like legal is compliance. One's regulatory, one's something else. And then one of them is RF exposure. And so. Apple legally has to tell you the amount of radio frequencies that are being emitted from your phone, because there is no.
Proven harmful health side effects as a result of this technology. They even have to go as far as to test your phone to make sure that it's not emitting enough RF frequencies that exceeds the allowable amount of SARS. And SARS stands for your, um, SAR stands for your specific absorption rate of the RF frequency.
So essentially what they do is they like almost like myth busters style it and they create this like. mannequin head with fluid inside of it. And then they put a cell phone up to its head and they measure the amount of thermal, uh, energy that has passed through by, by seeing the differentiation in temperature inside of the brain, as a result of the RF frequencies.
Now, once you read into this book and you find out a little bit about it, you realize that the SAR is a terrible way to actually measure this because the concern is not the thermal, uh, transition or the thermal, uh, Aspects of the technology. It's actually the DNA damage that's occurring as a result of creating free radicals But it can be a good indication of that type of damage So what Apple lists and what every single other phone company lists within the instruction manuals of your phone is that you should keep your cell phone at least Five to 15 millimeters away from your body at all times.
You should not hold your phone up to your ear. You should not drive with it between your legs. You should not you should not have it in your hand for long periods of times. You should have it away from your body as much as possible. And they have to list this in your phone settings. Not sure why I said that like that, but they do.
They have to list it legal, regulatory. The only thing that they have to list in there, as far as legal and regulatory bodies go, besides their terms and conditions, essentially, is the fact that this thing emits. That's terrible, terrible radiation. And as a result, it can harm your body. Just something interesting I wanted to share with you.
Now, the material that's inside of this hat, the material that's inside of this phone pouch that I put my phone in when I'm not using it. Stops those frequencies from being emitted, stops that specific absorption rate from going up, stops the DNA and cellular damage that's occurring, stops the creation of free radicals, which causes cancer and heart issues and all of these other hosts of insomnia and all of these terrible things.
But it's right there in your phone proof proof hundred percent open your phone. Look at your settings You'll see it right now when you're done driving check it out Whatever you're doing look at it in your phone settings and just believe me guys This is going to be the same conversation that we had about cigarettes 50 years ago 30 years ago 20 years ago We're doctors were literally Doing commercials saying, I prefer the American spirits.
I prefer an iPhone, right? This is safe and effective. This is good for your health, right? We're going to have the same conversation about your wifi router, about the microwave in your house, about your cell phone, about the 5g towers that they're putting up literally everywhere years from now, mark my word, that is going to be a consistent conversation, just the same way.
That we did it about cigarettes. Oh, it's safe. Oh, it's fine. Just the same way we talked about the vaccine. Oh, it's safe and effective. There's going to be no side effects. Well, guess what? Go look at VAERS. Right? Go look at VAERS. You're going to find out that they were lying to you for profitability. And what you don't realize is that the telecommunications companies that rely on EMFs being emitted from you, or being emitted around you all the time, make ungodly amounts of money, even more than the cigarette companies.
Crazy, crazy. So mark my words, guys. And that's why I started Ronin. So check out RoninBasics. com. Get yourself a Faraday hat, get yourself a Faraday beanie. We're going to be getting those phone sleeves out for you very shortly, get backpacks. We're going to eventually potentially move into apparel, shirts, all of that stuff.
Go check it out, become a part of the movement, share it, tell your friends. Send one to your mama. I don't know what you do. Ronan basics. com. Go check it out. And as soon as you get on there, there'll be a 10 percent coupon just for going to the website that you can just add your email into there. Just gives you all of the information, new drops and stuff like that.
And then if you give your cell phone on the next step, you get 15 percent off. So 15 percent off, go to the website right now, check it out. Ronan basics. com..
Alright, so let's move forward. The next and final thing that we're going to discuss here, um, well maybe not the next and final because we're gonna talk about this first, which is the fact that there was a plane in Sao Paulo, Brazil that went down very mysteriously, very weird way for a plane to go down.
Um, and there are some people that speculate that maybe it's because of the people that were on the plane. Do you remember the Titanic? There's this whole theory around the Titanic. The theory goes, if you don't know it, that there was all of these very, very powerful, rich people who were against the Fed, the Federal Reserve, being created right around the same time that it was going to be implemented.
These people were going to speak out about it. They were going to pour money into stopping it. They were going to do all of these things. Well, those same people went on this huge ass cruise ship together, and that same cruise ship happened to hit a huge iceberg, and everybody died. That's weird. Well, similarly, with this plane crash in Brazil, there was multiple, I believe it was eight physicians, eight doctors that were on this plane at one given time going to a conference to discuss and release evidence linking mRNA vaccines to very, very serious health effects.
Now, when you say mRNA vaccines, it's almost a, uh, it's a misnomer because, um, the mRNA technology was always a gene therapy. They literally updated the definition of vaccine to allow it to be considered a vaccine the same way they did it with herd immunity, the same way that they did it with all of these other things.
Right. Um, Orwellian very Orwellian. So there's a video that you can watch on either on rumble. It goes through about 15 minutes of it. Let's go ahead and watch this article. Or I'm sorry, watch this video from this article. And then we will talk a little bit more. Here you go.
That deadly plane crash in Brazil, killing everyone on board the two black boxes, the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder. They were recovered this chilling video. It shows that passenger plane in a free fall from the sky. All 57 passengers and four crew members died. There's still no explanation as to why or how this happened.
The head of Brazil's Aviation Accident Agency says the aircraft didn't communicate any type of emergency before this crash. ABC's Alison Kosik has more. This is the horrific moment a plane carrying 61 passengers and crew plummeted to the ground in Brazil, killing everyone on board. The two engine turboprop from local airline Voipass spinning out of control and crashing into a residential neighborhood.
Witnesses horrified. This man emotional. saying he was running late and missed the flight. Now, grateful to the airport worker who wouldn't let him board the flight taking off from Cascavel in the Brazilian state of Parana, bound for the airport in Sao Paulo. Shortly before it was scheduled to come in for a landing, the plane dropping 17, 000 ft in just one minute.
Usually this sort of thing occurs because the flight crew was not able to maintain or did not maintain enough airspeed. Clearly, it was a stall spin. How they got into it is what we don't know. The fiery wreckage. Large parts of the plane smoldering in a residential neighborhood. Debris littering yards.
One person on the ground was injured. Brazilian aviation officials say the aircraft did not communicate any emergency on board. The focus is on examining those black boxes, the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder, which will be crucial in the investigation. Allison Kosic, ABC News, New York.
Brazil's president declared three days of mourning for the victim. So there it is. Now the idea here, I believe that there was a, let's go ahead and pull it up and see if there's any other further information about this. From what we were reading. Uh, but that's a terrifying video. And if you know anything about ADV aviation, that shit doesn't happen, right?
Like you don't just magically lose speed and plummet. And if you do run a, run a, you know, one of your turbines or whatever, um, your engines, fails, you're going to tell your traffic control. I would know I was an air traffic controller. You're going to tell our traffic control, they're going to tell you this is happening.
And here's what we here's what we have going on. And here's our plan. And here's what we recommend you do. And you should stop at this, you know, this unmanned airport close to you. And, you know, you would help usher them to where they need to go. Now, from the comments here, it says, and they all decided to fly together and told others, that's what they were on their way to do.
You're saying this is the exact same conspiracy as the Titanic that was carrying men on their way to stop the creation of the Federal Reserve? Yeah, that's exactly what we're saying. That's exactly what I just talked about. Uh, it also says that, um, Malaysia Air Flight 370 had a team of semiconductor experts on their way to reveal allegedly room temperature semiconductors.
That's interesting. Hmm. Very interesting. Interesting.
Let's go ahead and watch this. This is, we'll see if there's any additional evidence here on the video that's linked. It leads you to a Rumble video talking about it. So let's see if we can, maybe we'll listen in to a couple minutes about the conspiracy aspect of this here. Here we go.
And blowing the whistle on the devastating turbo cancer epidemic sweeping the world have been found dead. The bodies of six world leading oncologists and two resident medics were found on Friday in the wreckage of a plane that plunged from the sky in Brazil and exploded in a fireball, killing all 62 people on board.
The doctors were on their way to an international conference in Sao Paulo, where they were set to present their findings that mRNA and the COVID 19 vaccines are responsible for the explosion of turbo cancers and auto immune diseases wreaking havoc around the world. I would just like to state that I had no idea the word turbo cancer was actually accepted.
I still don't know if it is, but that's a, that's a terrifying term. Turbo cancer. It's like turbo man, uh, turbo cancer. Hmm. I'm gonna have to look that one up in the world today, mainstream media are working overtime to brush the story under the carpets on behalf of Big Pharma. But the facts are damning and we're not going to let them cover up the truth.
Before we dive in, join the People's Voice Locals community. If you bursting into flames S two 500 vote PO. Airline Flight Plunge from the sky and crashed into a gated community. The plane was at an altitude of 16, 000 feet when it went into a death spiral and plummeted to the ground in 50 seconds.
Eyewitnesses who caught the crash on video said it appeared to stall before circling to the ground and bursting into flames at around 1. 30pm local time. A total of 15 doctors were scheduled to take the doomed flight, but miraculously seven had taken an earlier plane. New information tonight on this haunting scene.
A plane spinning slowly as it drops from the sky. Crashing in a Brazilian neighborhood near Sao Paulo. Bodies will take a lot of time. We are concentrating on providing specialized assistance from psychologists, social workers, and are being transferred to the morgue in Sao Paulo, where there will be x rayed and DNA tests will be done to identify them.
The eight doctors who tragically lost their lives in the air crash include radiologist Lionel Ferreira and paediatric cancer experts Sarah Stella and Sylvia Osaki. Eduardo Baptista of the Regional Medical Council said, unfortunately we received very sad news and were able to confirm the death of eight doctors.
The doctors were going to an oncology conference. These were people who dedicated their lives to saving others. Saving others for these oncologists involved warning the world about the devastating effects of mRNA vaccines and the skyrocketing rates of cancer around the world, including rare ultra aggressive cancers behaving in ways we've never seen before.
According to a colleague, the whistleblowing doctors were set to present evidence to the world that the public were misled about the nature of the mRNA Covid 19 injections. The doctors on the doomed flight had concluded that governments and regulators must urgently recall the mRNA vaccines. We have all been warned to stop researching this area.
My colleagues were told they must not, under any circumstances, bring this information to the public forum. But they chose to do it anyway. They understood the risks, but they did not expect the plane to fall from the sky. We now know that mRNA produces an uncontrolled amount of spike protein in the body because the N1 methylsudoridine allows the mRNA to remain in the body for an unspecified amount of time.
Moderna and Pfizer told us that mRNA would leave the body in a matter of weeks or months, but it doesn't. This, this is incredibly, incredibly dangerous. This is a disaster for global health. We are seeing the results of this deception in real time around the world. This According to Dr. Macias, some of his young and healthy patients have died days or even hours after diagnosis.
There are only a handful out of the hundred thousand doctors, Canadian doctors that didn't take the vaccine that are still practicing medicine. So it's something like 99. 9 percent vaccination rate. And they were the first ones to line up for their vaccines. Well, as I started looking at the sudden deaths of Canadian doctors, I realized, yes, most of them are dying from cardiac issues, heart injuries, cardiac arrests, uh, you know, dying while jogging or swimming, dying in their sleep.
And Dr. Peter McCullough has talked about this extensively about the myocarditis and the damage to the heart, the scarring to the heart. And then some were dying from blood clots, pulmonary emboli, strokes. But then there was quite a large subset of doctors who were developing extremely aggressive cancers.
And cancers at an age that they shouldn't be getting. So, for example, there was a doctor who developed gastric cancer in his 30s. Presented at stage 4, he was dead in less than a year. Very rare brain cancers in young individuals in their 20s and 30s, medical students, medical residents. And these cancers would always present at stage 4, and they would always kill them in a matter of a few months, and it was always less than a year.
And, you know, at first I didn't know, you know, what the term for the Bishop, Bishop, YouTube banned any contents that questioned vaccine safety. While popular YouTubers Oh, that's interesting. The YouTube CEO that was hyper banning material about the shot also so happened to die of turbo cancer. Following her, having all of the vaccines.
That's interesting. Well, for banning what she called vaccine conspiracy theories on the platform died after a two year battle with an ultra aggressive form of cancer. Under Whisky's leadership, YouTube banned any contents that questioned vaccine safety. While popular YouTubers with millions of followers were paid to promote the COVID mRNA injections to their followers.
Pharma companies were desperate to use stealth marketing to brainwash the masses. Taylor Swift's boyfriend Travis Kelce received 20 million from Pfizer to push their deadly product. To put that figure in perspective, it's far more money than he earns playing football. Alright, so you get the point. That was the idea.
These doctors were going to publish information, going to have a speech about this somewhere. Fifteen of them, um, were going to. So I guess, you know, what we should really do is dive into what did the other ones talk about when they arrived. If not all of these physicians were there, there should be some physicians that were at this conference that had the conversations that they were trying to stop them from having.
That would be a good follow up item for anybody out there and myself. Very interesting. So last but not least, we're just going to dive into this one, uh, getting towards the tail end of this here, which is that there's a new global health emergency says the who, what is MPOX? Where are the outbreaks and will the virus spread says AP news?
Now you always have to be concerned about a virus when they rebrand it, you know, just like they rebranded You know what they rebranded Transsexual into a transgender Right, they, as soon as they rebranded that, you knew some shit was about to go down. As soon as they rebranded mRNA technology into vaccines.
As soon as they rebranded, uh, you know, COVID 19 from, you know, every time they rebrand these things. You know, something's about to go down, right? It's no longer monkey pox. It's M pox because monkey implies that it's not going to kill you. It's going to kill monkeys, right? Monkeys implies that it aggressively transfers between monkeys and not humans, which is the case.
If you go on Google right now and you type it, you need to bookmark it because it says it doesn't transfer easily between humans. It's pretty hard to have a transfer. And when it does, it's not that serious. Well, we can't have that, right? So here it is.
Let's go ahead and take a look at this article. Right, SARS CoV 2, right. Um, no, here we go. MPOX, the new global pandemic. The World Health Organization declared Wednesday that the increasing spread of MPOX, monkeypox, in Africa is a global health emergency, warning the virus might ultimately spill across international borders.
The announcement by the WHO General Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus came after a meeting with the UN health officials. Here's the article for you. Um, The African Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared the MPOC's a public health emergency on the continent on Tuesday, who said there have been more than 14, 000 cases and 524 deaths in Africa this year, which already exceeded last year's figures.
Oh, wow. So far, more than 96 percent of all cases and deaths are in a single country, the Congo. Scientists are concerned by the spread of the new version of the disease that there might be more easily transmitted among people. They're concerned about it, but they don't know. But they're going to tell you that they know, so they can make money off of it.
Right? It goes on to say, what is Mpox? Mpox, also known as monkey pox, was first identified by scientists in 1958 when there was outbreaks of a pox like disease in monkeys. Until recently, most human cases were seen in people in Central and West Africa who had close contact with infected monkeys. monkeys.
In 2022, the virus was confirmed to spread via sex for the first time and triggered outbreaks with more than 70 countries across the world. And pox belongs to the same family of viruses as smallpox, but causes milder symptoms like fever, chills, and body aches. People with more serious cases can develop lesions on the face, hands, chest, and genitals.
So that's what essentially what you need to know is keep an eye on monkey pox, because it might be coming to a locked down city near you. And it is an election season. Just sayin Just sayin It is an election season, and they will do literally anything to shut you down and get mail in ballots to become a thing as it was last time.
Now do some research on that. But in the meantime, that is what I have for you, my friends. Go ahead and subscribe. Leave a five star review. I appreciate you. I love you. I'm happy to be back. We're going to be here every single week now. Consistency is key. I'm going to be right here with you guys. So make sure you subscribe.
Leave a five star review. Tell your mom. Tell your friends. Tell your cousin, your aunt, your coworker, whatever. The only way that this podcast grows is if you guys share it with other people. And I appreciate you. I love you. I hope you're having a great week. And I will see you soon, right here, on The Addams Archive.
The Adams Archive.
-
Welcome to Adam's Archive, where we dissect the most significant political scandals, unravel deep-seated conspiracies, and delve into the unseen workings of modern society. Hosted by Austin Adams, this podcast brings you thought-provoking discussions on current events, technological advancements, and historical parallels, all designed to shed light on the truths obscured by mainstream narratives.
Join us for a riveting episode where we delve into a series of interconnected events that have shaken the political landscape. We begin by examining the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump, analyzing the details and implications of this shocking incident. What were the security lapses, and why did the Secret Service fail to prevent it?
Next, we shift our focus to the mysterious disappearance of Joe Biden. Rumors are swirling, and we explore the various theories about his sudden absence from the public eye. Is there more to the story than what's being reported?
We also uncover the latest revelations from the recent congressional hearing. What were the key takeaways, and how do they impact our understanding of the current political climate?
Topics Discussed:
Trump Assassination Attempt: A deep dive into the details and security failures surrounding the attempt on Donald Trump's life. What went wrong, and what does this mean for his future security?Biden's Disappearance: Investigating the sudden absence of Joe Biden from the public eye. We explore various theories, including health issues and potential political maneuvers.Congressional Hearing Revelations: Breaking down the most significant revelations from the recent congressional hearing. What new information has come to light, and how does it change the narrative?Call to Action: Subscribe to Adam's Archive and stay informed on the topics that matter most. Follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media for updates and exclusive content. Your support is invaluable, and we thank you for joining us on this journey to uncover the truth.
All the Links: For easy access to all our content and platforms, visit https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
-
Welcome to the Adams Archive, where we dig deep into the stories shaping our world. Hosted by Austin Adams, this podcast offers an unfiltered and in-depth look into the recent attempted assassination of Donald Trump. Our goal is to provide the insights and perspectives that mainstream media often misses.
Each episode takes you on a journey through the shocking details of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. We break down every aspect, from the security lapses and political implications to the hidden forces at play. Discover how deep state agendas and corporate manipulations may have influenced this dramatic event.
In the Adams Archive, we uncover the inefficiencies within our security systems and the impact of poorly implemented policies. We discuss how political agendas can compromise national safety and public trust, using the Trump assassination attempt as a real-world example to illustrate these dangers.
We delve into the lives of key figures involved in this event, offering a nuanced perspective on their roles and the broader implications of their actions. Our discussions provide context and depth to the political figures and shadowy entities connected to this assassination attempt.
Our analysis uncovers the tactics used by media to shape public perception and push specific narratives about the attempt on Trump's life. By understanding how propaganda works, we help you see through the fog of misinformation and get to the truth.
Join us on the Adams Archive for fearless explorations of the Trump assassination attempt. Subscribe to the podcast and follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media. Your support is crucial in our mission to uncover and share the unvarnished truth. Thank you for being a part of our community.
All the Links: For easy access to all podcast-related content and platforms, visit https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams.
Subscribe now and never miss an episode. Your journey to uncovering the truth starts here.
----more---- Full Transcription -
Brought to you by Roninbasics.com: Protect yourself from the perils of modern technology with high-quality faraday products designed and developed by yours truly.Podcast overview
Dive into the most captivating and controversial topics of our time, blending deep research with a touch of humor and a lot of heart. From bizarre trends and historical horrors to groundbreaking medical theories and conspiracy revelations, we cover it all.
Summary of Major Topics:
Influencer Insanity: We delve into the bizarre trend of influencers and celebrities shaving their teeth down to nubs for porcelain implants. Discover the dark side of aesthetic trends and the shocking consequences people face for the sake of beauty and uncover the ancient wisdom of meridian energy.
Disappearance Mysteries: Dive into the harrowing tales of individuals who have faced unimaginable horrors, from underground bases to mysterious disappearances, this is the chilling case of Gabriela Rico Jimenez. A mexian supermodel who blew the whistle on a elite trafficking ring and then was never seen again.Historical Horrors: Journey back in time to uncover the gruesome and fascinating stories of historical figures like King Geza, whose reign was marked by brutality and human sacrifices.
Cultural Collisions: Witness the rapid cultural erosion experienced by remote Amazon tribes upon gaining internet access, and the profound changes it brings to their traditional way of life.
Make sure to hit that subscribe button and leave a five-star review. Follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media to stay updated on our latest episodes. Thank you for your support!
All the Links:
For easy access to all our podcast-related content and platforms, visit linktr.ee/theaustinjadams.----more----
Full Transcription
Adam's Archive.
Hello, you beautiful people. And welcome to the Adams archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we have a couple of deep dives. We're going to have a couple other things sprinkled in there too, but a couple of deep dives that we're going to discuss starting with the.
Crazy trend that has happened probably over the last, I don't know, five or six years, but even more so recently, the amount of celebrities, the amount of tick tock influencers that are out there getting their teeth shaved down with essentially nail files into nubs, and then getting fake implants of teeth, porcelain implants into their mouth.
Now there's a specific case that brought this up more recently, and it came from TikTok. So we'll discuss that. But what we're really going to talk about there is the idea behind why this is truly a problem, right? There's, there's this fundamental idea behind traditional Chinese medicine, which talks about the meridian.
And so that's what we're going to discuss first. After we talk about that and the horrific things people are putting their bodies through, and we'll actually use a case study here of the, with this woman from tick tock that caused this topic to be discussed because I saw it recently pop up in one of my feeds.
And it's just unbelievable. The amount of people that are doing this without even understanding what the potential side effects could be. So we will talk about that. After we talk about that, we are going to talk about a father in, I believe this was in Mexico, who went on stage at a, uh, comedian's show and smacked him several times.
And you would go, that's crazy. You should be able to take a joke, right? But there's a lot more to the story. And I think He might be justified in this. So we'll talk about that. Then we will jump into a remote Amazon tribe left hooked on pornography after finally connecting to the internet. Uh, so this tribe essentially got.
The internet and the very first thing they did was get absolutely unbelievably, horrifically addicted to pornography. So we will talk about that. Then we will move closer and closer into our real deep dive of the day. But before we jump into that for that last deep dive, we will discuss. A royal tomb of an African king that is actually completely made of human blood?
After scientists had recently confirmed. And then the last thing that we're going to discuss today is the curious case of Gabriela Rico Jimenez, who was a Mexican supermodel who essentially disappeared off the face of the earth. Going outside of this hotel back in August of 2009, and she had made these crazy claims.
Something about celebrity, elites, billionaires, cannibalism, and a lot more. She even calls out a few names, one that you'll be familiar with, and if you're not familiar with it, I'll tell you who they are, and why it's important, and who they're tied to. Spoiler alert! It's the Clintons. And so we'll talk about that.
We'll do a deep dive into that situation. We'll watch a couple clips and we will go from. So all of that and more, but first I need you to hit that subscribe button. I know it's been a few days, few weeks, even two, three weeks since my last podcast episode. And I apologize, but I appreciate that you're here.
I love you. Thank you so much for listening in. I know life comes up for a lot of people on a lot of things and that's what's happened here recently. Anyways, so. Uh, life comes up, life gets crazy. I have, uh, career, children outside of this, but the goal has always been to consistently put out great content for you guys, and that's what I hope you think about this episode right here.
So again, thank you for being here. I appreciate you. Subscribe. Leave a five star review. And if you haven't heard I have a new side project among those other things that I have, including a career and a family and a wife and a hobbies like jujitsu represent. And, uh, all of the different shit that I do, I decided that I was going to start a completely separate business, which is Ronin.
And if you haven't listened to the last few episodes, maybe you don't know Ronin is a Faraday Goods company and what Faraday Goods do is they protect you from the harmful effects of modern technology, everything from EMF radiation poisoning that is being emitted constantly from every piece of technology around you all of the time, including the cell phone that you're listening on this to including the car that you're in right now, if you didn't know that most cars today emit EMFs while you're sitting there driving your vehicle.
And they have unbelievably terrible side effects to your health. And so a few things you can do is you can get Faraday goods and essentially eliminate the effects of those products by having specially lined fabric within things like hats, beanies, um, even like, uh, Faraday backpacks can. Put your laptop, your cell phone inside of it.
It will eliminate your digital footprint. It will stop those EMFs from being emitted, and it will even stop the corporations and governments from being able to track you. It eliminates completely all inbound and outbound signals. So go check it out. Ronan basics. com. We are finalizing all of our orders for everything right now.
The hats, just like the one that's on my head, right? Now, uh, the first order will be in, in just a couple of weeks. And so I'll be making those first shipments from all of the pre sales from the orders. Uh, backpacks will be following a few weeks after that phone, uh, phone sleeves. After that, I currently have the wallets up there, everything Ronan basics.
com. Go check it out. You'll love it. Love it. And that's what I got. Let's go ahead and jump into it.
The
Adams archive.
That's a jam. Every time I hear that, that's a jam. All right, let's go ahead and jump into it. The very first thing that we're going to discuss today is going to be the disgusting trend of influencers and celebrities out there getting their teeth shaved down with nail files so they can look like Gollum from Lord of the Rings, only to have porcelain implants.
The teeth implants implanted into their face after they get their teeth shaved down to little disgusting nubs all in the name of aesthetics, right? You know, there's like 80 year olds, 85 year olds, 90 year olds out there who need veneers and that makes perfect sense to me, right? If you don't have teeth, you need to eat.
You don't want dentures. You don't want to deal with that. That's okay. Get veneers. But if you're young and you're healthy, the hell are you doing? Why in the world would you take something that God gave you, beautiful teeth in your mouth, maybe not so beautiful, but much better than shaving down your teeth with a file, and then having some dude in Miami shove porcelain into your mouth like it's not an actual living part of your body.
Your teeth are so much more important to your body than modern medicine, western medicine wants you to believe. And that's what we're going to talk about today. So the very first article that we're going to take a look at is going to come from Indy 100. One of my favorite new news articles that sources a ton of different articles from all over the world for you.
And, uh, Pretty good stuff. So there's a video coming out of the New York Post and this TikTok video that this woman had posted, but let me just show you what we're talking about here. Okay, when we talk about them shaving down your teeth, this is what we're talking about. Okay, here we go. If you're looking at my screen right now, you will see a woman.
That looks just like Gollum from Lord of the Rings. I have to get this up here for you. There it is. Oh my God. That's terrifying. How horrific. And to do this to yourself for just aesthetics, like I can get plastic surgery, do your thing, I don't care. It's not my body, but. Like there was absolutely nothing wrong with this woman's face.
Absolutely nothing wrong with her teeth, but she was convinced by society that she had to whittle down her teeth from what they were to turn them into this horrific Frankenstein science experiment, because that's what celebrities do. So let's go ahead and watch this video. This woman's talking about her veneers and why she decided to do this and all of the terrible things that happened to her sense here.
Here we go.
I know that I look crazy and it's so embarrassing to come crying on the internet, but this stuff that I have been dealing with for two years because of my freaking teeth is like I don't even know what to do anymore and like the only place I can really go to is my platforms. As everybody pretty much knows, two years ago I Had, um, dental work done, I smelled Dental Center 32 in Miami and it ruined my life.
Like literally ruined my life and I'm still dealing with it to this day and I just left another doctor, another TMJ doctor. This is the third or fourth one that I've gone to and I'm just very overwhelmed. Like, The medical industry, the dental industry in America is like, they literally do not care about what you are going through.
Like, everything is about money for them. And like, I understand like, people have to get paid. But it's like, the fact that like, I can't, I can't do anything. Like, I can't use insurance. I can't do anything. I've already spent 80, 000 pretty much on this whole situation in two years. And I go to another TMJ doctor because I have severe TMJ now because of the veneers that Smile Dental Center did.
They, they, they lost my bite. I have severe TMJ. I got my T3 done. It, it didn't fix it. That was another 30, 000. It's just like, I just had an appointment and like, you know, they're telling me like, okay, we could do this, we could do this, and it, you know, it could, it could be a big money pit and, you know, it could be, you know, another 80k and, you know, might not work.
Like, I spent so much money with so many doctors just praying that something works for me. And nothing works. Nothing ever works. I don't know what to do anymore. Like, I can't even sue the freaking dentist. Every, every time I come on here telling my story about what happened, which is a crazy ass story.
I'm like, just sue. Why don't you sue? If I could sue, that would be the first thing I'm, I'm doing. But I can't do that. I can't do that. It's, it's not possible. Like, can't sue for my sensory issues. My sensory issues are unknown. Every time I go to the doctor.
So let's talk about this real quick. And it's easy to look at this person and say, You're vain.
You shouldn't have done that. Your body was perfectly fine. You know, it's easy to laugh at this person and go, You know, play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Right? But let's, let's put our empathetic hat on. Let's pretend this is your wife. Let's pretend this is your daughter. Let's pretend this And I don't know what she looked like before before she got this done.
So let's pretend that maybe she had some little bit of messed up teeth. And you're in Miami. And if you ever been to Miami, like literally 10 percent of the people 20 percent of the people that are there, if they have money, they have these fake veneers. And so this woman, With our empathetic cats on your wife, your daughter is convinced that she would be more beautiful, that people would accept her more, that she would have more friends, that she would seem cooler.
Like she would look like, you know, one of those supermodels that she watches on Instagram all day in Miami. And like to have society convince you that you need to be anything other than what you were then to go somewhere that convinces you that you need to pay them 80, 000 and they'll make you better.
Then to have all your, your teeth essentially whittled down to nubs, this porcelain shoved into your mouth, which is too big for your mouth. You've ever seen people that, that get these done. It's way too big for their mouth. A lot of times they don't look natural. They don't look normal. A lot of times. And when you get that done that way, And it's not the natural way that your teeth were supposed to sit that your body had gotten used to for, I don't know, in this woman's case, 25, 30 years, maybe your jaw alignment, your, your teeth all are meant to be the way that they were.
And so when she's talking about TMJ, she's talking about the misalignment of her jaw, causing consistent pain. throughout the day, causing migraines, causing all these things. I've had TMJ in the past and it's, it's a terrible thing to deal with. And it makes your jaw click and you can't open your mouth as wide.
It's, it's not fun at all. And to have it caused by somebody who told you they were going to make you better, that you spent your own money on to have them do it. And then as a result, to have this happen is just, I can't imagine. So keep your empathetic head on while you're watching this and, and maybe.
Yeah, maybe it's, you could roast her a little bit, but right. It's still, it's a terrible situation to find yourself in. So let's finish this out.
After they've never heard of it and you can't prove that they gave you these issues because there's no way to diagnose it specifically. Like it's just a whole thing.
They offered to give me my money back within the first year. And I told them no, so that I could bring awareness because like, People are just like, you know, out there getting veneers and whatever the case may be, like, my life is literally ruined because I got my teeth redone. Like, I'm not even joking, like, my, I'm constantly in pain.
I can't even close my mouth properly after a retainer every single day. 24 7 pretty much to even close my mouth comfortably. No bite adjustments can fix it. Nothing. I've done a hundred bite adjustments. I've gone to 10 different dentists, four different TMJ doctors. I've done integrative medicine. I've done acupuncture.
I've done everything you could possible. I've done hypnosis. I've literally done everything you could possibly do to try to fix these issues. I've been called crazy by my primary care doctor at Kaiser. They told me to therapist. Because I'm wondering what I'm going through At this point like I just don't know what to do.
I'm in severe pain I've gotten freaking acid or Botox twice my fucking face is slim the fuck out Like I look crazy as fuck because I'm in pain 24 7 I Guess my only thing is just don't get fucking veneers and know that like Something like this can ruin your life like literally and Quite frankly, I'm not giving nobody else 80 fucking bands.
Like no, I'm not doing it. Like the fact that these people are so like, just everything is so money driven. And then like, I understand, but it's like, this shit is like really medical for me. Like why does nobody care about people?
And so that video had 9 million views. Let's see how many it has now. Not sure where to see that on the web app.
But it has 100 or 864, 000 likes. Let's see what the number one comment is. Veneers and LASIK I'll never do because of the horror stories I have heard. Somebody said, babe, could it be a trigeminal neuralgia? Basically, the veneers hit the specific nerve. Interesting. Veneers are so extreme. I don't know why people have to do it.
Try braces or composites when the tooth was hurting. I wanted to walk off the little planet. Yeah, so that's the terrible thing about this is she hasn't even begun to see the real effects of this. Hasn't begun to see the real effects because the only thing she's dealing with right now is TMJ. And she probably gets headaches or migraines as a result of the TMJ or even that trigeminal neuralgia, which is, can cause, you know, essentially what they call like these terrible, horrific, uh, types of migraines.
And so she's not even beginning to see the effects of this because what we're about to listen to is the fact that your teeth are tied to the nerves in your body and those nerves have connections. throughout your entire body. And this isn't something that's like mainstream accepted within modern medicine dentistry within the United States of America, but it is in many, many, many other countries.
And so that's what we're about to watch this next clip on, which explains how these types of like each individual one of your teeth has a specific nerve that it's tied to that affects other parts of your body that causes issues within your body as a whole, whether it's, uh, things like, um, I don't know, talking about high blood pressure, talking about your, your obesity, talking about all of these different health effects.
And we'll actually pull up the map here in a minute and look at it, but let's go ahead and watch this video. It talks about the meridian, uh, essentially the meridian lines in your body and the connection to your teeth and all of the terrible things that can happen from doing something like what we just talked about.
And this is coming from the ultimate human podcast. Here we go.
Doing the most harm out of any medical profession. It's like, here you go, opiates. What is biologic dentistry? Because it absolutely blew my mind. Each tooth is alive. It's a living organ. Any disease in the mouth can correlate to the rest of the body. You're taking a look at the whole body, not just the oral cavity.
We can help people live a lot longer. How quickly can we help a patient heal? We're getting them off of meds. That's a passion of mine. If you're having symptoms, question it.
Hey guys, welcome back to the ultimate human podcast. I'm your host, human biologist, Gary.
Wait, what was I doing? And then you seek out the world's best doctors are knowledgeable in this and it's stuff that's been, it's out there. The literature is out there. The science is out there, but it's, do you believe in it?
Do you want to take that step and actually go that road? And it's very hard to talk to all the dentists and all the colleagues like, Hey, there's something else out there. You know, we can actually be causing harm. It's like, do no harm is our first, the Hippocratic oath, right? It's do no harm. But it's actually, when you look at it, we're actually doing dentistry is doing the most harm out of any.
Medical profession now leading
dead tissue in the body. Yeah I mean, you just got to wrap your arms around that there's actually dead tissue in the body And it doesn't have a blood supply and what a bacteria like they like dark moist oxygen deprived places anaerobic bacteria That's immune system can't get to and I want to talk specifically about a study that that was just Published in, in July of 2023.
So this is only about three months old. It was published in the journal of microorganisms, but it was a longitudinal study that investigated the association between periodontal disease. and neuroinflammatory disorders. And neuroinflammatory disorders are Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, dementia, all kinds of conditions in the body that are related to inflammation that eventually begins to affect nerves.
And we don't correlate dental hygiene or, you know, dental pathologies to Parkinson's, to early onset Alzheimer's, or dementia. And even before these conditions exist, we Memory and cognitive decline, um, exhaustion, fatigue, weight gain, water retention. And what I found really fascinating was that out of the 24 studies they examined, 20 of them showed a positive correlation between periodontal disease and neurodegenerative disorders with the studies focusing on cognitive function.
Demonstrating the most robust effect.
Yes.
So these are all the things that are robbing people of their short term recall, their cognitive function, their waking energy, that they may be chalking up to a consequence of aging, that may actually be a consequence of something going on in their jaw from dental work that they've had done that they've left unaddressed.
Correct. And one of those bacteria there, the Treponema Yes, the Treponema denticola. Yeah, that's me. Sorry, it's one of the five bacterias. Let's just keep it simple. Yeah, one of the five bacterias. That's, that's known for beta amyloid. Producing beta amyloid, which we know is for Alzheimer's. Right. So when it all starts here, if we can actually control it, and it sometimes goes more in depth than doing a, Regular cleaning, sometimes we have to use lasers, sometimes we use ozone gas, sometimes we'll put some medication in the pockets, what we call the periodontal pockets.
Right. But if we can cure that, doesn't mean like every tooth needs to come out, right, but if we can hold on to the teeth and we have ways much better than ever before, much better than when I graduated dental school. When you say
keep, to keep your
teeth. Keep the teeth, yeah, we graduated, I graduated in 2009.
Keep
your
teeth. How
simple
is that? Keep your teeth, right? And so we'll look at this, this, uh, article. We'll pull it up here. This is Dr. Rose. com R O Z E and talks about the Chinese Meridian Theory. And so let's talk about that. I was hoping to find it within that video, but I think that was a good point enough is that the health of your body, your cognitive decline, your obesity.
High blood pressure, arthritis, all of these things could very well be tied to the dental work that you're getting done by modern dentistry. Because when you're pulling teeth, or even worse, whittling them down to nothing, only to be replacing them with exterior material that isn't meant to be implanted in your body, something's going to go wrong.
And so here's a clip about Meridian. Dentistry or meridian belief system or theory, and let's watch that. Each
tooth is a key. The key is press, and it causes a motion to strike a note, which creates a vibration and a sound. Each key produces a different sound, just like the relationship between the keys and the notes.
Our tifa connected by nerves to our brain. These nerves and nerve impulses send messages to specific parts of the body. What does this all mean to you? Well, if you have a bad tooth, the energy flows through the meridian belonging to that tooth, and this flow can affect the health of all the organs on that meridian.
For example, tooth number 14, the first molar, is on the same meridian with the kidneys, liver, spleen, stomach and breast. So if this tooth has a problem, it may affect the energy flow through the meridian, and the health of those organs may be affected as well. Your mouth is connected to specific organs in the body.
This is something that practitioners of traditional Chinese medicine have known for thousands of years. The human body is really quite amazing when we listen to its messages. Sir William Osler, a founding father of modern medicine, said the mouth is the mirror to the body. A vital relationship exists between your teeth and your organs.
Use our bio dental chart available from dr rose. com to see the relationship of your teeth and the rest of your body.
Right, so that's the idea. And when you think about that, and you go, Oh, you know, you hear about traditional Chinese medicine, meridian lines have been a debated topic in modern medicine up until about I think is about two one, one or two years ago, where they actually found the interconnection within the body of these like nerves that are all connected.
And so When you look at the traditional Chinese medicine, think of acupuncture, acupuncture utilizes the meridian lines in your body to help, uh, you know, unblock the, the energy flow, the, the nerves connections and the firing of your nerves within your body that, that all speak to each other. And so this is, this is how it explains it says in traditional Chinese medicine, meridians are channels that form a network in the body through.
Which qi, or qi, I assume, uh, vital energy flows. A blocky Causes pain and illness the flow is restored by using pressure needles suction or heat at hundreds of specific points along The meridians, right? You talk about acupuncture The meridian tooth chart is based on acupuncture meridians pathways of energy that span across interrelated body parts glands and tissues and you have to remember What did she?
Say what are the comments say they're like when you have people having terrible horrific what they call like Suicide migraines or that trigeminal neuralgia that she talked about Acupuncture is one of the only things My wife actually dealt with that during one of her pregnancies, where she had what we thought was either trigeminal neuralgia, some sort of horrific like, um, um, like clot in her brain or something.
It was horrific, horrific headaches, unlike you could ever imagine in your whole life. And the only thing that helped my wife, The only thing that subsided the pain. We went to the hospital over it multiple times. They literally did nothing for us. Kicked us out with an 8, 000 bill. The only thing that helped her.
And up until very recently, and even today, right now, the traditional acupuncture is not an accepted form of, of Western medicine. They don't, they don't agree that it's, it's works, but it works. People all over the country get acupuncture done. It's literally the Only thing that she did that helped her with her migraines.
Why? Because it has to do with the nerves. It has to do with the meridian lines. It has to do with that flow of that, that firing of, of the nerves, that flow of energy throughout your body. We are electrical beings, your thoughts, your movements, everything that's happening inside of your body is an electrical pulse within these, the, the firing of these nerve endings.
And so it makes sense that if you. use the body to its advantage and understand that rather than trying to impose your will upon it with metal, uh, you know, types of tools and medications and pharmaceutical drugs and injections and all of these things that the modern Western medicine tries to impose its will upon the body rather than trying to allow the body to do what it needs to do to correct itself.
That is the huge difference between modern medicine. medicine in traditional medicine, holistic medicine. So it goes on to say the meridian tooth chart is based on acupuncture meridians, pathways of energy that span across interrelated body parts, glands and tissues. Each tooth is associated with a particular meridian through which energy flows.
And so when you look at this chart here, make sure you're,
So when you look at this chart here and you zoom in on it and take a look and if this is a chart that you want, I can send you over the link, just go to my Instagram. I'll have a post about this and you can just comment, uh, and I'll DM you it, but it basically outlines all of the teeth and, and what their attachment is to which part of your body and what can result from not Dealing with those issues correctly for that specific tooth.
And so it goes through a whole long list of things from migraines and epilepsy from the, so if, so first, I guess it shows the tooth or teeth that are associated with it, then the part of the body. So things like your stomach and spleen, your lungs, your liver, your gallbladder, your bladder, your lungs and large intestines, stomach, heart, small intestines, um, all of these different parts of your body.
are associated with a different tooth or a different meridian line. Again, same thing that they deal with with acupuncture. And so the things that this can result from is migraines and epilepsy, rheumatism, migraines, focus issues, sterility and impotence. So even your, even your Fertility can be affected by your teeth, um, focus, right?
And so each one of these different zones of your mouth can have different negative effects on your body. It says if a weakness of in a particular system or organ exists, the condition of the tooth associated with that area could exacerbate the problem working with our Meridian tooth chart makes us able to assess patients, general state of health and wellness, simply through a review of the oral environment.
Each tooth is associated with a particular Meridian through which energy. Flows. Very interesting. It says the mouth is the mirror to your body. Energy flows through the body along lines known as meridians. These lines associated with specific tissues, organs, and teeth. Health problems manifesting in the tooth may be related to conditions of the associated meridian.
Interesting because this is a specific doctor that kind of specializes in this stuff. And again, it's D R R O Z E dot. Now, the funny thing about this is I found this article today, which says there is now a drug to regrow teeth, which has been approved for human trials. So, on the back of that, maybe you don't need to get all of your teeth pulled and get veneers.
Maybe you just need this other pharmaceutical drug and that will solve all your issues, of course. And there'll be no side effects, just like everything else. Um, so it says, scientists are gearing up for human tricks. Not tricks, trials. Human trials, which makes way more sense than tricks. Human tricks. For a groundbreaking, truth growing science.
A tooth growing drug with hopes to offer those suffering from tooth loss a revolutionary alternative. Molecular biologist and dentist Katsu, uh, Takashi developed the first of its kind drug by deactivating the uterine sensation associated gene, the UTI. One, protein, which is known to stop tooth growth. He has been working on tooth regeneration for almost 20 years.
We want to do something to help those who are suffering from tooth loss or absence. While there has been no treatment to date providing a permanent cure, we feel that people's expectations for tooth growth are high. By stopping USAG 1 from interacting with other proteins, the drug prompts bone morphogenetic protein, BMP, signaling and encourages the growth of new bone and teeth.
The researchers noted that mice and ferrets share the same USAG 1 properties as humans. The animals happen to grow new teeth from the drug. So my concern would be that if you're growing new teeth and growing new bones, how does your body know which to grow when and how long? Right, like if you hope to grow one tooth back, are you going to, you know, make yourself taller?
Like, are you going to make your fingers grow long, too long, and you're going to look like Edward Scissorfingers? Um, the USAG 1 protein has a high amino acid homology of 97 percent between different animal species, including humans, mice, and eagles? Wow, that's very specific. Beagles. Um, is that what they're doing the studies on?
Oh, that's horrible. If you go back and listen. Remember what Fauci was doing to dogs? That nobody's bringing up again? Like, the horrific trials that Fauci was involved with? And I'm pretty sure it was all specifically beagles. Where they would essentially put them in a cage where they couldn't escape and then put thousands of bugs in there that would essentially eat them alive?
And meanwhile, I'm sure he's just living it up on a yacht somewhere after getting roasted by the Senate this week. Anyways, just a side tangent, human trials are set to start in September 2024 at Kyoto University Hospital in Japan, using 30 male participants between the ages of 30 and 64 who are missing at least one molar.
The next phase will look at children who suffer from congenital tooth deficiency. Then, researchers will explore other Generations who have lost a tooth due to environmental factors have proven successful the drug could become widely available as soon as 2030. The promising development in dentistry has the potential to revolutionize the way the treatment of tooth loss and provide solutions for people across the globe.
So, if this lady, this girl, this woman, maybe just waited a few years, I don't think that was her problem. The problem was vanity and living in Miami around a bunch of vain people. People, but anyways, interesting, very interesting. Now, the next thing we're going to talk about here, which I found to be a pretty wild scenario is that there was a dad.
Dad went on stage and punched a comedian over his sexualized joke about his baby son. Now, from what I saw, this wasn't onstage joke. This was like on Twitter, uh, prior to this. But let me read 'cause maybe I'm wrong, I didn't read this article yet. It says, footage of a dad punching a comedian's mid, uh, comedian Midat after he allegedly made a sexualized joke about his three-year-old son has gone viral.
Spanish comedian Jamie. Caravaca was performing a standup comedy show in Madrid on Monday evening when a man unexpectedly gets on stage. Dad, Alberto Pugalito, punched Caravaca in the head while shouting in Spanish. This is for the pedophile comment he made about my son. Will you repeat now what you said about my son?
Pugalito continued while calling the comedian a piece of shit. Say it. Say it again to my face, he said, enraged. Here, now, say it to my face. Yeah, I'm pretty sure this happened, like, on Twitter, and then he went to his show and started, and, like, punched him on stage and then smacked him in the face. It says,
Three month old son. The dad hit Caravaca one more time before leaving the stage. Says comedian makes jokes at art. So here's the video. Let's go ahead and watch it. It's in Spanish. So I'll, I'll translate for you. In which case, don't listen to me translating and listen to the Spanish.
It says, who are you?
What's up? It
says, this is for, this is for my Alright, let's just start the whole thing with this. So loud. He
said, who are you? Huh? Oh shit. What's up, huh? He smacks him. What have you said?
This is for the pedophile account. Huh? Huh? Will you repeat now what you said about my son?
Huh?
Piece of shit. Now what?
What were you saying about a black cock in my son's second cock at
three months
old? Huh? Piece of shit?
Huh? Now what? Say it. Say it again to my
face. Here. Now. Say it to my face.
He said, I'm sorry. He turns around. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm asking you all for forgiveness.
I'm sorry, I'm sorry. I'm just a dad that defends his kids. He has made sectionalizing comments about my three month old son. And that has it's consequences. He says, can we talk to you? He says, no, you can go. He calls him a clown. He's a weird
dad. I don't believe in that so much. And this next bit is how I would crack your fucking skull.
And then he says, let's leave. Good. Finally, justice is served for somebody who's talking shit online, who in no way shape or form would ever back it up or say the same thing in person. So this man, this father gets his, in a Twitter argument with some comedian online. The comedian then tells him something about his son sucking black cock.
Excuse my vulgarity. And his son's three months old. So this man drives to his comedy show, goes up on stage, punches him, and then smacks him in the face while ridiculing him in front of his entire crowd.
That deserves a standing ovation, and I'm sure it was much more entertaining than whatever bullshit comedy this clown, as he would describe it, was going to actually do during his show. Alright, so, good. Good. More people getting to get smacked. Hundred percent. More people getting to get smacked for the stuff they say online.
Good. For sure. 100%. If you are willing to say something to somebody online, you should understand that that is a real person, potentially, depending on if they're a bot or not, but majority of the time, they're a real person who you could see out there and you would never repeat yourself to them in public.
Right, just the same way that when you're driving a car, you would never treat people the same way as you treat them when you're driving. Because it's like removed, you remove yourself from the human aspect. It's not a situation we were supposed to find ourselves in biologically. Is that you're going 85 miles an hour with a metal, you know, 3, 5, 8, 000 pound vehicle representing you.
Not supposed to be that way. Just the same way. It's not supposed to be you're on a looking, staring at a piece of glass, somehow communicating with some person across the globe, or maybe even five minutes down the road, but you don't know it in that part, you would say some crazy stuff to that person, but in this situation, he got what he deserved.
So let's see if there was any updates on this. Nope. Clarified the transcription. Cool. So just wanted to point it out. I think this, that's a real dad right there. That's a real man who shows up there, says, say it to my face, say it to my face, smacks him just like he deserved and then leaves. Respectfully looks at the audience, apologizes and says, but I needed to do this for my son.
And I don't disagree. All right. Now onto some more serious matters. Okay. Which is the fact that a remote Amazon tribe was given Starlink and given access to the internet and the very Very first thing that they did the very first thing that they did was got addicted to porn. I Mean to be fair. I don't blame them, right?
If you had never if the only thing you've seen is like the seven Ten twenty hundred women that are around you all the time and in your remote tribe You And all of a sudden you have access to all of these supermodels from around the world, shaking their ass in your face on a piece of glass in front of you.
And you've never had the opportunity of that before. I get like, I get it. It really does show you the power of, of like human human biology, that the very first thing that they did was get addicted to porn, not gambling, not cryptocurrencies, not NFTs. They got addicted to porn. Almost immediately. Thank you, Elon Musk.
And I believe there's a video here. Let's watch this video. I'm not sure if there's audio to it. Let's see. Let's refresh. Here we go.
You're just watching this guy in this forest with his knife next to a tree. It's like indigenous tribe member.
And they're like behind this leaf with the camera. I'm not sure what this has to do with this article at all. Maybe he's sneaking off with his new iPhone to go watch Pornhub. Why is this on this page?
Okay, maybe it was like some random, maybe we'll have context here. Rare footage of uncontacted tribe in the Amazon. Okay. So it says what started as a moment of optimism and excitement was swiftly transformed into something worrying and sinister. After a remote tribe in the Amazon rainforest was finally hooked up to the Internet.
The Marubo people had resisted modernity. Moderninity? Modernity? Moderninity? What the fuck? What? And preserved their indigenous way of life in one of the most isolated stretches of the planet for centuries. But then, in September, they found themselves equipped with high speed internet thanks to Elon Musk.
The tribe is one of hundreds across Brazil that have been given access to the web through Starlink, the SpaceX subsidiary which provides satellite internet coverage in almost a hundred countries. But rather than feel beautifully connected to the world, the installation has left the 2, 000 member Marubos feeling bitterly divided as pornography and social media poison its youngsters.
When it arrived, everyone was happy.
SonomamaMarubo73 told the New York Times, whose reporters traveled to the tribe's remote villages. But now, things have gotten worse. Says, uh, they explained that the internet has brought a number of undeniable benefits, such as the ability to video chat with faraway loved ones, or call for help in emergencies.
However, she said, the youth has grown increasingly disinterested in more traditional activities, such as making dyes and jewelry from berries and shells. Yeah, young people have gotten lazy because of the Internet. She lamented, they're learning the ways of the white people.
Hmm.
Pretty sure it's not just white people that have access to the internet.
After just nine months with Starlink, the Marubo. Already found themselves faced with the same issues that plague Western families. That's really interesting though, to like kind of accelerate this technological advancement and see as like a Petri dish, how quickly their lifestyle could be tainted. Um, it says that.
The same issues that plague Western families, addictive social networks, misinformation, wow I'm sure they're so concerned about misinformation, scams, violent video games, and minors watching adult content. Alfredo Marubo, leader of the Marubo Association of Villages, has become the tribe's most vocal critic of the internet.
He told the New York Times that he worried that his culture's oral history and customs will be lost now. Because everyone is so connected that sometimes they don't even want to talk to their own family. He admitted that he felt most concerned by the newfound interest in pornography, particularly given that Marubo culture frowns upon mere kissing in public.
We're worried young people are going to want to try it, he said. He said of the graphic sex depicted in videos which young men now send each other in group chats. That's a little gay. Alfredo, Alfredo added that some leaders have already noticed more aggressive sexual behavior among their youngsters.
Meanwhile, a father of three said that while he was happy the internet was helping to educate his children, he also felt concerned about the first person shooter video games. I'm worried they're suddenly going to want to mimic them. I don't think you guys have, you know, the right equipment out there. Uh, yet many tribe members continue to extol the internet's positive power and potential.
Uh, he pointed out that a venomous snake bite can require swift rescue by helicopter, but before the internet, the Marubo relied on amateur radio to relay urgent messages through several villages in order to reach the authorities. Now such calls are instantaneous, and it could, it's already saved lives.
Very interesting. This is in the village, you don't hunt, fish, or plant, you don't eat. Well. Now they can just order DoorDash, right? Maybe not, but you get the point. Meanwhile, Thomas A. Marubo, 42, the tribe's first woman leader, stressed that while some young people just want to spend the whole afternoon on their phones.
Yeah, I'm sure that's actually quite difficult. Like I have, you know, I have children. I have children that are the age enough to have technology and deal with the woes of an iPad in your house. And you, it took a long time. Like when I was growing up. Our parents saw the, the, the advances and still gave like some timelines, but there's a lot of children today that just have absolute free reign of their technology, and it baffles me because you have to set those guidelines.
The, the, the iPads, the social media, the whatever it is, pornography, whatever it is, is absolutely 100% designed so that you, it hijacks behaviorally the, the biology inside of you to make you want to stay there and give them your money and your attention. Right, because tension is just a currency. Uh, he explained that decades ago, the most respected Marubo shaman had visions of a handheld device that could connect the entire world.
Oh, did he? You mean he somehow saw a phone? Um, it would be good for the people, he said, but in the end, it wouldn't be. Wow, they foresaw this. In the end, it would be war. Nevertheless, his son, Inoki, insisted, I see, I think the internet will bring us much more benefit than harm, at least for now. And regardless, there's no going back.
The leaders have been clear, he said. We can't live without the internet. So interesting. So many conversations that you could have about that regarding that, that, that, like, incubator, right? That, that Petri dish of just it completely accelerating from hunter gatherer societies immediately being Thrusted into, for lack of a better word.
thrusted into our modern society of technology and all of the negative side effects that that would have on the not just the youth but the I guarantee you the adults are watching just as much porn as the kids right or playing the first person shooters or you know there's so many things that that are actual negative effects on society so speaking of like faraway tribes and I'm not going to touch on this long because I have to get to the bigger deep dive but there was this african tomb and The king, the tomb of this king was made of completely human blood.
Is that what I'm reading? Right? So scientists have uncovered a grisly secret at the tomb of an infamously bloodthirsty ruler. King Geza ruled the West African kingdom of Dahami from 1818 to 1858 before it fell to the French colonization at the end of the 19th century. And yet he carried his violent tyranny to the literally, as a news study published in the journal of Prodemic says, Over the course of his four decade reign, King Geza was known both for his military power and his brutality towards his enemies.
Uh, he was so vicious that the ally, uh, leading to his hut was paved with the skulls. The alley leading to his hut was paved with the skulls and jawbones of defeated enemies, while his throne rested on the skulls of four defeated enemy leaders.
Gangster. Ironically, according to the official records, Gezzo died peacefully in his home, but he couldn't resist bringing a bit of savagery down to the underworld with him. Before his death, he ordered the construction of two adjoined funer Funerary huts to be built in honor of his father, who wrote from 1797 to 1818.
For decades, rumors swirled around his tomb, suggesting that it was built using the blood of 41 human sacrifice victims. Now a team of researchers have confirmed that this is indeed true. True. Whoa. According to the team of medical and archaeological specialists, the victims would likely have been prisoners of war or enslaved people.
And because 41 is a sacred number in voodoos, they would likely have been sacrificed in a ceremony conducted to protect the late king's remains. Geez. The study's authors explained the kings of Aberney were god kings, whose culture and religion centered on voodoo beliefs. In this chronocultural context, death is only a change of state, not a total disappearance.
Importantly, which I completely agree with. Importantly, a barrier between the human world and the place where the body is laid can be magically delineated. The separator is part of a supernatural border, since metaphysical elements are incorporated into the physical world. Prayer, sacred water, and the blood of enemies were among the elements considered key to consecrating buildings such as these.
When combined, so prayers, water, and blood. When combined, their mystical force was believed to symbolically protect what remains of the subtle essence of the deceased king. Geez,
uh, to determine the truth behind the legend, the scientists use a technique called high resolution, tandem, uh, tandem mass spectra spectrometry, spectrometry to analyze the mortar, uh, used to build the funeral Hutt's wall. Specifically, they examine the proteins present rather than the genes as DNA degrades easily over time, depending on the storage conditions and most importantly, for this study, it cannot provide information on the source tissue.
Unlike proteins, which can serve as biological archive, the testing identified hemoglobin and. Uh, immunoglobins. from both human and chickens present. Very interesting. This involved a sacrifice of as many as 500 victims. So it's possible the blood in the mortar may have come from one such ceremony. It's a ceremony called the great customs.
Now the researchers hope that future DNA analysis might help pinpoint the exact number of individuals in the tomb. As far as we're concerned, even one is too many. Yeah. Thank you for your insight. Yeah. Don't kill people and scrub them on the walls. Well, after you die to protect you don't do that. All right.
Now we have our deep dive, my friends, which is going to be about Gabriela Rico Jimenez. But first, make sure you hit that subscribe button. Make sure you leave a five star review and make sure you should you support your boy. Go to Ronan basics. com. Check out the new website. Some of the products are a backorder right now, and you can actually pay and order them.
And I will ship and deliver them to you as soon as they are here. So it's been months and months and months working on this, finding the right manufacturers, working with them side by side, sample after sample, after sample. I am a meticulous perfectionist with certain things when it comes to business.
And. Manufacturing suppliers and getting the product to be perfect is one of them. So go check it out. Ronan basics. com. Some of the products are up there already with pictures like the wallets. We will have the actual legitimate product pictures very shortly for the hats, beanies, backpacks, all of it. So you can actually see what you're getting, but I promise you you'll love it.
All right. So. That's what I got. Let's go ahead and talk about this right here, which is Gabriela Rico Jimenez, the very, very dark and curiously interesting story about the disappearance of Of a Mexican supermodel. So let's go ahead and read this together. There's several, several articles about this one from the daily mail.
One from, uh, this right here is from the daily mail, which outlines all of this as well. But the most intricate of these I found from this Reddit post, which has all of it. So, here we go. Let's watch this video first. This is the video of this supermodel, Gabriela Jimenez, where she is freaking out outside of this hotel.
And I will tell you what she's saying again. We have a lot of Spanish translations today, interestingly enough. Uh, so, let's go ahead and watch this video and I'll tell you what she's saying. Translate for you. Right? All right. It says, let's hear what the young girl was shouting on the street. This is from a news company She's saying I wanted my freedom and you can hear the pain in her voice
Since Monterey freed me, but it cost me a lot of work. I was in Mexico City for a year and four months She's crying all of this began in mid 2001 I barely remember. They were young and powerful, and they killed them. I'd been knocking on doors. What I wanted was my freedom. I want my freedom. She was claiming to have been abducted or essentially being, kind of, uh, being trafficked in a trafficking situation.
Um, Carlos Slim. Dominique knew about this. I want my freedom. Now that name becomes very, very important. Carlos Slim. You may be familiar with it. One of the richest men in the world, and is the richest man in Mexico today. It hurts my soul, she said, that they took him away. Leave me alone. They have already taken me to the police station, and they have told me that they know nothing.
She's screaming at these police officers right now. They took me to the general hospital. You, you were there. Go get the, you killed Murino. And we'll talk about who that is in a minute, it's a politician. They told me, who did they kill? The Queen of England? The Queen of Germany? Did they kill the princesses?
And Mickey Mouse? It was also him, she said.
What? Nothing is gonna come here. The people where you come from, they are crazy. They killed a lot of people, she's screaming at this man, telling him. Death to that kind of human. Go away. Saying that he was a part of it. They ate humans. Disgusting, she said.
They ate humans. I wasn't aware of anything. Of the murders. Yes. But they ate humans. Humans. They smell like human flesh.
Now this female police officer is walking up to her. You are not going to take me until this is clarified. You already took me there. Let me go. As this female police officer grabs her,
she says, let me go.
It says, this is the sad
reality of the young Gabriela Rico Jimenez that you saw a moment ago tried to attack the police officer who managed to take her, no, the police officer grabbed her and she pushed back. She wasn't attacking the police officer. That's
so silly. There's
the video for you and the translation thereof. Let's go ahead and read this article and talk about it. So, this says the event took place in August of 2009 in Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, in front of a hotel located on Ocampo Street, in between the avenue of Pino Suarez and not going to try and pronounce that.
The news broadcast features a young woman named Gabriela Rico Jimenez screaming in front of a luxury hotel. She repeatedly pleads for her freedom and claims she was held against her will. She makes claims of murder and cannibalism and drops some very big names in her accusations. Most public outbursts such as this could be attributed to mental illness or substance abuse, but Gabriela's claims are consistent and somewhat coherent and she speaks with such horror and conviction.
I feel compelled to further consider her credibility. Then they show the news clip. There's the transcription, I already read it for you. It said, What happened to Gabriela Rico Jimenez? So, you saw this woman, out in front of this hotel, screaming at this man, screaming at this man, saying, You knew about this.
You were a part of it. You were there. They took me to the hospital because of it. And they said, who, who did the, who did they kill? Who did they kill? Did they kill the princesses? Did they kill the Queen of England? Did they kill Mickey Mouse making fun of her? And she said, no, they killed Marino. And Marino was a politician.
She even mentions the name Carlos Slim. Now, Carlos Slim, as I was telling you, was one of the most powerful people and the richest man in Mexico. Carlos Slim is a huge contributor and donor to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton family funds all of these politicians, Democratic politicians. And guess what else he funded?
The movie, The Sound of Freedom. Hmm. So the same man being accused by this woman who disappeared and was never saw again funded the Clinton campaign was, she claims, was trafficking people, cannibalizing them, and set up the murder of a politician. That same man funded the movie, The Sound of Freedom, which is just so happens to be about trafficking children.
That's interesting. Very interesting, especially when you understand the controversy surrounding The Sound of Freedom, and the man who did the documentary, and the accusations against him.
Now it says a witness speaks, and this is, let's see. Here it is. Here's where it talks about Carlos Slim. It says what happened to her. Finally, Gabriela Rico Jimenez, the woman who was arrested outside of a hotel in Monterey, was helped by DIF police on Monterey. And after she was detained in jail by the regional police, she was, she was sent to a psychiatric center in Buenos Aires.
colony where she will stay indefinitely while she receives help and can be well cared for. Gabriela mentions the name Carlo Slim, and who was a Mexican business magnet of Lebanese descent. He is the richest man in Mexico and was the richest man in the world from 2010 to 2013. He has a son Carlos Slim, who serves as chairman of the board of his father's conglomerate company.
The Merino, Gabriela claims was murdered is Juan Camilo Mourinho Torre Torrezo, who is a Mexican politician affiliated with the National Action Party, and the Secretary of the Interior of the Cabinet of President Felipe Calderón. He died in November of 2008. During a Mexican city Learjet crash, the government plane was seen traveling and crashed into rush hour traffic under mysterious circumstances.
There were 16 fatalities, all 9 people on board and 7 people on the ground died. Juan Camilo Mourinho was 37. As President Felipe Calderon's strongman, he had been leading a government campaign against Mexico's powerful and violent drug gangs. Illuminati conspiracy theories frequently mention the British monarch, among others, as well as Disney symbolism.
There is also a rumor that the Prince Philip, the Queen's husband, once said that cannibalism is a radical, but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation? Whoa, let's see if we can verify that in a minute. Um, there is a testimony of the alleged witness to Gabriella's breakdown on a Spanish language blog called the black Manic a law student claims to have spoken with Gabriella and gives the following account of their interaction.
Um, it says a witness speaks after a long time. I will not reveal his name for obvious reasons. So what he says is basically that he was in the detention center at the time he was working as a law student and was in this detention center doing some work. And he said that he saw her there. He said, I still remember her face full of despair, fear, anguish.
She felt very weary of the environment and a strange feeling. I approached her and asked her some questions. Um, if I name, if I knew where she lived, she told me that she, they were all, that we were all dead. And that we were all dead, that we were all, we were among them, among other things. That simply left me paralyzed after 20 minutes of being with her some tall well dressed people arrived They practically pulled me out of there I asked them why they did this if this was just a poor girl with a mental disorder Asked where that where they were taking her.
They told me that was not my business to for me to retire When they left me they stopped me and asked me what she told me I answered them insane and I ran away. The next day I went to the senior officers of the ministry and told them about the issue and wanted information because the girl's family requested it.
They just laughed and said, really? If she does not exist, she never existed. And you do not work here. I got a shiver and left. I left everything and left Monterey. I had a feeling that what had happened those days and what that girl said were true as I could. I left everything and got out of there. She told me that in Monterey there was some kind of underground base where they lived and regularly stole children as food and other things.
By my profession, I dare not reveal my encounter. I have family and children who depend on me. And for logical and reputation reasons, I cannot. I would like to go out and spread it to the four winds, but society would call me crazy. Although I have the marks of the attack, is a little bad back, there are nights I just cannot sleep.
That's a weird translation. I have the same feeling, the same feeling that when I saw them the first time, it was like a, uh, presentiment is appreciated that they do not judge me as crazy for telling me that. Only me and for those who were with me at the time know what happened. Those are monsters. At least the one who attacked me was a monster.
If he found me, he would only have died since a drawing came into my hands.
What?
Interesting. Hmm. So that's what happened to this woman. She's never been seen since nobody knows where she's at and the internet was essentially scrubbed of her modeling history. Like she was a pretty prominent supermodel.
She had brushed arms with all of these oligarch types like Carlos Slim and she Essentially after this happened, you look up her name now and you can't find anything about her as a person or her modeling career besides just these articles about this situation calling her crazy. But she's never been seen again.
And she was 21 at the time. So she would be what this was 15 years ago, she'd be 3536 right now. And some people believe she's just still in that same mental institution. And she may very well have been a part of some like MK ultra type mind programming. And so crazy shit. Transcribed And there's video of it and the only reason that they showed this video on the news was because she was a prominent model.
And so when you look at who is Carlos Slim, who is the person that she is claiming was a part of this, who is at the head of this, and actually if you understand that the most powerful people in Mexico, who have the most money, I mean, this is conjecture, um, but, Very likely have ties like you don't you don't get to flaunt your money or be in a position of very high power in Mexico I assume without having some way shape or form brushed arms with the cartels.
So who is Carlos Slim? Well, let's watch this video of Trump First and see what he has to say about Carlos Slim
Times is Carlos Slim now Carlos Slim as you know comes from Mexico He's given many millions of dollars to the Clintons and their initiatives. So Carlos Slim, largest owner of the paper from Mexico, reporters at the New York times, they're not journalists, they're corporate
lobbyists for Carlos Slim and Hillary Clinton.
He is the majority holder of the New York times. So why did Hunter Biden and Hillary Clinton's Mexican cartel partner, Carlos Slim fund the sound of freedom? That's interesting. And here's a picture with Joe Biden, Carlos Slim, and Hunter Biden all together, says the sound of freedom brings to light the horror of human trafficking.
However, there's one major question about the film. Why did Carlos Slim, a man with connections to Mexican cartels, Hillary Clinton and Hunter Biden fund the film? In 2016, Donald Trump warned America about Carlos Slim and his connections with the New York times. And Hillary Clinton saying now Carlos Slim, as you know, is a Comes from Mexico.
He has given many millions of dollars to the Clintons in those organizations. WikiLeaks emails revealed that Slim had connections to with drug, Mexican drug cartels. Even the Guardian published the article titled, who is more dangerous? El Chapo or Carlos Slim? Hunter Biden's laptop revealed that Slim was also a top customer of the Bidens.
There are even pictures of Hunter and Joe doing business with Mr. Slim. Now here comes the tricky question. Why did Mr. Slim fund the Sound of Freedom when he has direct ties to cartels that are guilty of smuggling? The Deep State's most effective tool against Trump was the QAnon conspiracy theory. Q is effective because the Deep State used the theory and its associated accounts to leak just enough information to be credible, but at the same time, nothing being leaked could ever tie anyone directly, hence why dark to light never happened.
Hmm.
What is this company? National The national file. com. Okay. So maybe take this with a grain of salt because I don't know, but I mean, it's legit. Everything he's saying is legit. Or she, um, Q also gave the false pretense that to MAGA supporters that they did not need to be involved with their local GOP through the trust plan line.
Okay. Um, Hmm.
Interesting. Uh, re energizing the Q PSY op may have been Slim's reason for funding the sound of freedom. The solution to the human trafficking problem is the same as election integrity. America's first patriots get involved with their local GOP to ensure MAGA, congressional and presidential candidates, are on the ballot and win free and fair elections.
Hmm. Okay. Uh, so take that all with a grain of salt, but nothing he said that was factually incorrect. Carlos Slim is tied to drug cartels. Carlos Slim is tied to the Biden family. Carlos Slim is tied to the Clinton family. And he also funded a movie while also being a part of, you know, tied to the cartels, which do the trafficking, funded the movie about trafficking.
Kind of suspicious. So that is what I'll leave you guys with today. Thank you so much for listening. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart. I love you. Have a great day, and I'll see you next time on The Items Archive. Thank you.
-
Protect yourself from the perils of modern technology with high-quality faraday products designed and developed by yours truly by going to RONINBASICS.com today.
Welcome to The Adam's Archive, where curiosity meets deep discussion. Austin Adams is the host of this podcast, which dissects the myths, ideas, and realities that have shaped our world. From historical insights to futuristic forecasts, each episode invites you to question what you know and discover what you don’t.
In this episode, I interview Bryanna Robinson, a dynamic social and political commentator with a sharp intellect and a passion for uncovering hidden truths. In this episode, we dive into the mysterious world of ancient technologies lost to time, challenge the official narratives from NASA, and discuss the profound implications of the decline in human consciousness. Join us as we unravel the complex web of history and science, offering listeners a unique perspective on how our understanding of technology and consciousness shapes our reality.
Summary of TopicsInnovative Thinkers: Dive into the minds that have shaped our technological landscape. From Tesla's forgotten inventions to the ethical dilemmas posed by AI, we explore how genius shapes our world.Art and Culture: Witness the transformation of art and culture through technology. Discuss the decline of traditional art forms and the rise of digital media, questioning what these changes mean for future generations.Conspiracy Theories: From moon landing skepticism to the secretive societies like the Freemasons, unravel the threads of doubt and secrecy that suggest a different narrative of history.Societal Changes: Examine how shifts like remote work and urban decay influence societal structures and what it means for communal living in the future.Technology and Privacy: Delve into the dark side of tech advancements, including the loss of privacy and the ethical challenges posed by emerging technologies.If you're intrigued by the unknown and passionate about uncovering the deeper truths of our era, subscribe to Adam's Archive on platforms like YouTube, Substack, and your favorite social media channels. Your engagement fuels our journey into the mysteries and marvels of our world. Thank you for your support and curiosity!
All the links: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams.
----more----
Full Transcription
Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adams archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today on today's episode. I have a discussion with Brianna Robinson. Now, Brianna is a social and political commentator, just like myself. And she has tons of great contents, tons of great insight into plenty of different topics, including the moon landing government operations and conspiracies, historical events, really great. Really interesting stuff. So Brianna and I have a great conversation today. We jump into a ton of different topics, everything from the lost technology of Nikola Tesla and, and the utilization of modern energy and, and the death of language, the death of art, we talk about, uh, the, the moon landing and she gives some great, great insight and points into, and we have a discussion about the Freemasons, the Rosicrucians, which was a cult essentially within the Freemasons that was founded by Sir Francis Bacon. And Sir Francis Bacon has a ton of deep dive rabbit holes that you can go into very, very interesting that we talk about every single one of those things and more today. So make sure you stick around to the end and. Go give her, Brianna, a follow. You can find her on Instagram at Brianna, B R Y A N N A, B R Y A N N A, xRobinson, R O B I N S O N. So go give her a follow. I hope you enjoyed the discussion as much as I did. It was an absolutely great conversation. And, without further ado, well, wanna do, Which is that leave a five star review, subscribe, and here's what I would ask of you. Something that you may not know about podcasts is the really the only way social media, no matter how many millions of views my content gets, very, very little moves the needle when it comes to podcast viewership. So what I would ask of you is if you enjoy this conversation today, send it to somebody, you know, tell them, Hey, did you know this about Sir Francis Bacon? It's crazy. Have you ever heard about the, the. Van Allen radiation belt. Have you just send it out to a couple of people and share the conversation because it was a great one. It was an absolutely phenomenal conversation. And I know you, and I know a bunch of people that, you know, we'll enjoy it as well. So please, please, if you enjoy the conversation, share it with some family, share it with some friends, talk about it with your coworkers and give them the link. All right. Now subscribe, leave a five star review and let's jump right in. Into it. The Atoms Archive I was sitting in an hour of traffic. 📍 So. Oh, geez. Yeah, that's that. That's that California traffic. That's a little different, huh? Yeah. You probably didn't have that where you were before. Where were you before? Waco. Waco. Wow. That's an interesting one. Well, I grew up in California, so I'm back home. I was only in Waco for three years. Got it. Yes. All town vibes for sure. Yeah. A hundred percent. How is that? Like, is there any discussions about the Waco situation in general there? Is there like whispers of it still? Is it still kind of linger? Yes. People don't really talk about it. Like Waco's moved on. If anything, they talk about. So I was talking to a local at the site and he was talking about how the Clintons were involved and how Clinton, Bill Clinton, actually gave the kill order, when they burned down the compound and killed everyone. And he was telling us all about how Clinton and Bush would go to this house that was like just a couple of miles away. And I verified this, by the way, on the maps, he said it was covered in pine trees, like dense pine trees all around the house, kind of weird. So you couldn't see in and they would go there and engage in Epstein style activities. Apparently, David Koresh got caught with a bunch of CSAM, which is child pornography in the basement. Of his compound. So I have a feeling David Koresh was kind of in on or at least knew about what they were doing. And so there was a point of contention there. And so this guy was telling us that and I can't, I can't verify his story. Obviously, I can only tell you what he said, but he was saying that That Clinton was involved in what the ATF was doing how they came in and were shooting up the compound And he gave the kill order from the water tower down the street, which you can still see yeah, just crazy crazy story Wild so david koresh was the individual that was kind of the head of the the situation over there in in the house that they were in and so So the idea there would be that they kind of had a some sort of High level safe house over there that they were doing, like you said, Epstein style activities, and was David Koresh potentially in the know? Is that why the idea is that Clinton sent the order? I mean, if CSAM was found in his basement, I would think that he probably was part of that operation at some level, or at least knew what was going on because Clinton and Bush obviously knew who he was. Bush has a ranch in Clifton, which is probably like 20 minutes outside of Waco. I don't know. So he comes to town often and Waco was actually supposed to be the Freemasonry capital of Texas. So they have like a huge temple there and another local was telling me that apparently there's tunnels from like Baylor and like all through downtown and stuff. I don't know if that's true or not, but there's definitely some weird stuff going on in Waco. Yeah, absolutely. The Freemason one's a really interesting one. So I like, I would say my gateway drug into conspiracies. So when I, when I went into college, I took, I was in just a normal history class. It was like American history, a certain time period to a certain time. Here was like some, some time period to 1987 or something like right around the founding father's time period. And when I was reading through the books, the textbooks that they had. They mentioned the Freemasons maybe like two to three times. So when I had to write my final paper for the class, I decided to write it on the Freemasons. And so I did, I did like the, I have like 25 page papers somewhere on the internet, somewhere that I wrote about the Founding Fathers and the Freemasonries that were actually so there's this whole crazy situation that brought me down a rabbit hole with Sir Francis Bacon And the idea that he was one of the have you ever heard that idea? Do you know who Sir Francis Bacon is? I've heard the name you have to remind me So there's some really interesting situations around Sir Francis Bacon. Sir Francis Bacon has a. Rap sheet of conspiracy theories behind his name. So he was actually the found, the founder of the Cru. The Cruin is like a, they, there's a, a, a book that was basically written called the My Chemical Wedding. And the idea is that it was basically this kind of cultish situation, even within the Freemasonries and Sir Francis Bacon is, if you follow the founding of the country, there's like little seeds that have been planted that all allude and point back to Sir Francis Bacon. He's a crazy character. Some people believe that Sir Francis Bacon because William Shakespeare was like a pen name. Some people believe, based on the, the idea of who they thought, like, who Shakespeare was, that the person behind his writings, the person behind the plays, because Shakespeare, as they knew him, was not nearly as educated to write the plays that he wrote, to, to have the style of writing that he wrote. So some people believe Sir Francis Bacon was behind the, The, the constitution, he was behind the William Shakespeare and that he was actually the, the head of the King James version of the Bible. It's the one of the wild, so I started on Freemasonry, which is crazy in and of itself to realize it's some 75, 85 percent of people who, who signed the, the constitution were Freemasons. Yeah, but when I took that road, I found this name, Sir Francis Bacon. And then I read my chemical wedding of the Rosicrucians, which was a kind of like subculture, weird, esoteric cult within the Freemasons that he founded. And then that took me down that whole rabbit hole. So he, this one man, People believe could have been responsible for all of these different things based on his background. It's, it's one of the wildest, coolest, craziest conspiracies that you can go down and it's, it's absolutely unbelievable, but that, that was like the, the, like I said, the gateway drug, the marijuana of my, of my conspiracy journey was, was the Freemasons. Down to Sir Francis Bacon and I somewhere on my iCloud, I still have the chemical wedding PDF file of the book. I'll have to send it to you. It's pretty well. Yeah, I'm gonna have to look into him. What an interesting character. Yeah, it's it's crazy. And so there's all of these different things that like some people believe the He was like formally trained under the queen, like the queen had determined that she in some way, shape or form came into contact with him at a younger age. And she basically like brought her under her wing and gave him all of these mentors and all of these linguists and all of these like mentors and like raised him up from a very, very young because she saw something in him. And eventually he Did all the things that I just talked about, allegedly when you talk about so, so, and there's even some theories when it comes to the King James version of the Bible, that, and there's actually some very interesting comparisons between the Rosicrucian belief system, which is actually in completely intertwined with the Freemasonries. Really, really interesting stuff. So yeah, that's, that was my gateway drug. What, what was your gateway drug into conspiracy theories? What was the very, very first one that was like, damn, this all might be true. You know, when I was like 10 or 11, my dad made me watch food, Inc. Man, have you seen that one? No. Okay. Well, it's all about our food system and it goes into like, Monsanto is trying to monopolize the food industry, the farming industry and Oprah's connection to it and all of that. So that was like my introduction to the world is not what it seems. And I remember being so like spooked after watching it cause I was a child. And so I guess from then on you kind of see the world differently and you kind of question things and then as I got into high school and in college, I was listening to like Charlie Kirk and Steven Crowder, Candace Owens and just kind of keeping my, my ears open to all of that, but my dad had always been like a hardcore, like Alex Jones fan. So he would ask. Like in the garage and I'd kind of hear it, you know, throughout the day and stuff, but it definitely started with food ink when I was really young. Interesting. So, so it's, it's so funny how it's like, you know, I just went like super deep all the way and then it's like seed oils and there's so many different ways to find you in this. And the funny thing about that is there's an interesting. Like if there's a Venn diagram of political ideologies in somewhere on the very big portion of the conservative or right or right of center, let's say, there's a big cross section between the people that were deemed for so long to be conspiracy theorists. And I hate even using that term. if you understand the background of it was completely utilized as a way to, to delegitimize opinions that were obviously legitimate as we've seen over the last, I don't know, three years or four years as everything's coming out from COVID and everything. But it's, I don't understand why, because if you go back, let's say 20, 30, 40 years, 50 years, even back down to the seventies, the conspiracy theorists were always the hippies, right? Like the dirty hippies, the guy on the corner with the cardboard. Box signs saying like the, the, they're all, you know, the, the, the government's after you or whatever it was, the world's coming to an end. Like the, the, the OG conspiracy theorist was always like a, some dirty hippie. And then, and then you go back and you actually look at the ideologies of the hippies. Back in the seventies and, and the movements that were happening, the anti war movement, the anti federal reserve movements, and every, even to this day, people think of hippies and like this negative weird light, which was totally a great psi op by the propaganda machine of the seventies. But. It seems like there's been this huge pendulum swing from like the dirty hippies of the seventies, quote, unquote, to the conservative movement that's normally like suit and ties. And, you know, there's the Venn diagram is totally shifted from one side to the other. Yeah, absolutely. And you see it a lot here in California, people are so health conscious in Southern California. You have a lot of those like classical liberals who are more like socially liberal, but they're very like. They're very hippie and they're very like in tune to like what's going on with the food and stuff. And for a lot of them, the food is the gateway drug that gets them into politics and gets them to stop voting Democrat. And you go back and like the food, you go all the way back to the food pyramid. You want to talk about the deepest of middle school conspiracies. I remember being in health class and them teaching us the food pyramid. And at the very bottom of the food pyramid was potatoes and bread. And at the very top was meat. They were trying to convince you. It was like the, even the same way that they still try to convince you, they have cereal for breakfast. It's like the, the, the, the big industry that is behind the Kellogg's, the, the craft, the, you know, the, the, you know, which all the way goes back to maybe like three or four major organizations, right? You talk about BlackRock Vanguard that owns every single one of them. Like they own every single other thing in the world, essentially. But you look back and you look at the amount of money that was pushed to pedal the idea that Egg yolk was bad for you, cholesterol was the devil, and that you should be eating frosted flakes for breakfast. It's absolutely crazy, right? There was, there was in the textbook, it was in our textbooks growing up. The food pyramid was the biggest, like the lobby gateway. Yeah. So like get people that that's it's yeah. They brainwashed an entire, I think two generations now with that nonsense. For sure. And so I saw something today that I actually reposted. There's Matt Kim. You know who Matt Kim is? Brilliant. Love, love his style because it's very just like, I, I tend to be very animated. That's just my personality. And most people that get online and talk are, but he's very just calm, cool, and collected, super simple, a hundred percent. He does a great job, but he posted something today and it showed that. Jeff Bezos grandfather was actually a part of DARPA. And so DARPA being the, the government organization that was responsible for creating the internet. And for some reason, when I think of all of the Silicon Valley elites, the Mark Zuckerberg's, the, you know, fill in the blank, the Jack Dorsey's, the Google, whoever that guy is somewhere in a mansion, whenever you think of those people, I always think of. There was something that there always seemed to be some sort of tie back to like big money, right? Everybody wants to say all these Silicon Valley executives. They were at one point some 18 year old innocent guy in the garage with their best friend. And and everybody wants you to think it was like the Pulled themselves up by their bootstraps. They left Stanford. They created the biggest organization in the entire world. But when you look at it and you see that almost all of them got venture capital backed money. They got they got investment funds from from the largest VC organizations in the world and you realize that the same way and this was something I always thought. The reason I bring them up is because I always thought Jeff Bezos was like the safe one. I was like, Oh, he was the one that grinded it out. He started with books. I don't know if you remember. Do you remember when Amazon was just books? Was it? You don't. Oh my God. We're going to, we're going to learn you today. I might've heard about Amazon. I was like a child and someone got me a gift card and I was like, what is this? Okay. So I'll give you, I'll give you a lesson here. So Amazon was originally only books. The only thing that you could buy on Amazon was a book because you always had to go into Barnes and Noble or I don't even remember the name. Barnes and Noble and. Borders was the other one here in California. Borders. That's what it was. Borders and Barnes and Noble. And you had to go in and buy books. And so what Jeff Bezos did, was he created an online platform that you could just buy books from other people. And it was it was basically just a, essentially where you could go look up your book that you wanted. Somebody else would post it and then you would buy it off of them or you would buy it from the bookstore. Eventually that that's what it ended up turning into. But am or Amazon was just books for the, like probably its first five years or so. And I only know this because my aunt was like the biggest, Book nerd, growing up. And so she, I just remember her raving about it. And she thought it was the coolest thing. I don't even have to go in and buy books. But it started as only books. That was the only thing that you could buy on Amazon. And what he did is he utilized that as a way to build a, a Because the only thing like Amazon is Amazon, Amazon doesn't sell anything. Amazon is just a logistics company, right? They're just warehouses and trucks that take things from point A to point B. And, but it all started with books. And so I had this idea in my head and we'll get back to the DARPA internet conspiracy here in just a second. But I had this idea in my head that Jeff Bezos was like, you know, the one who really did it right. And it wasn't the Mark Zuckerberg who got this big VC funding from Silicon Valley dropped out of. Stanford or Harvard or wherever he's from, you know, and he, and he made it right. He was the billionaire who like did it the right way. And I saw that today and it like blew my mind a little bit because every single one of the tech CEOs that you know Got millions, like tens of hundreds of millions of dollars of backing from big money, but they want to give you this idea, you know, being entrepreneurial myself, I've had like several businesses throughout my life and I enjoy coming up with an idea and creating it. And you have this idea in America that you're just going to create a billion dollar business. But in the same way that you have to get through the gatekeepers when you go to Hollywood and you want that role to be an Avenger, you got to get through Harvey Weinstein. You got to, you, you have to go through that checks and balances of the Silicon Valley world. Like you have to be, the only thing that's probably more liberal than the Hollywood world is the startup world. Oh, yeah. And I've, I've realized that over the last several years and Jeff Bezos was not safe. So his grandfather actually was a part of DARPA who was the found one of the the founding military organization that started the Internet to begin with. And he does a podcast. I think it was with Lex Friedman. And he does a podcast where he talks about how, Oh, he grew up on this farm and he raised cows and chickens and had his grandpa raised him. But then, you know, now as of today that he was actually running. DARPA and creating the internet. And then somehow magically he just so happens to find himself in a trillion dollar business, 25 years later. Like Taylor Swift, right? She says, Oh, I grew up on a Christmas tree farm and I had this cute little humble country life. No, no, no. Her dad basically bought her way into her career. Exactly. And that's what all of the Swifties like seem to forget so quickly. Yeah. Like they, they, they, Taylor Swift and I, you know, you hear her music. I, there's very little talent there. I don't know. Maybe some people think that she's talented. I don't know. I like country music. She started out in country. But she was absolutely, when you go to her show, people don't talk about how amazing her singing was. They talk about how amazing the production is. Yes, there is tens of millions of dollars of marketing and production and pyrotechnics that make her show what it is because if it wasn't that she would be very undifferentiated from any single girl standing on the side of Broadway in Nashville right now with a guitar singing a song that you would probably walk past without giving five dollars to. No, she's, she's a good songwriter. Like I'll definitely give her that. She's talented with her lyrics, but as far as like the music goes, everything sounds the same. The storylines are all kind of recycled now. And like you said, like she can't, I'm not gonna say she can't sing, but she's not the greatest singer. It is truly all about the show. Yeah. Yes. It's huge production. There's like my, my daughter, I have three children. My daughter watched like the most recent Taylor Swift. Movie that came out or documentary or whatever. And it's just like the most unbelievable, more fireworks than none at Disney on the 4th of July. Like it's this huge, crazy production. She changes outfits like you know, 12 times with the, throughout the night. It's this crazy, unbelievable, huge marketing machine, which, which I think speaks to like the way that with enough money behind anybody, we talk about gatekeepers. Enough money behind anybody enough money behind any idea enough money behind any single individual in the music industry or you know Even if you look at it, I don't want to say what's his name post Malone, right? You go back and you have you seen the video of post Malone is like very first video that he did I don't think so like music video Oh yeah, yeah, he, he posted this, it was like from his very first video, and I'm, I actually like Post Malone, I think he seems like a very genuine dude, I listen to his like 4 hour podcast on Joe Rogan, but he seems like a very, he seems like he did it right, but you go back and you look at like his very first video that he did, and it was like the funniest, most ridiculous, most ridiculous. Talentless video that you could ever imagine. It's great though. It's great. It's great to see where somebody can start and go, but, but the point in all that being, whether it's Hollywood, whether it's the music industry, whether it's Silicon Valley, VC startups, whether it's whatever, even you go into the news industry. Every single one of these organizations has a gatekeeper at the very top of it that decides, are you gonna, are you gonna make it? Or are you going to like, and really when it comes down to are you going to make it? It means are you going to play by the rules of the game, which makes me. You know, I don't trust Elon Mux at all, and I get a lot of crap from people about that, but I don't think you can get where he is without playing by their rules. And he wore it was a couple of years ago. I don't remember the year. Exactly. We wore a white tux to the Met Gala for his debut with Grimes, his girlfriend. And on the back, it said no bus order. I don't know if you've seen that, but yeah, there's that I don't think they would allow him to buy Twitter. It's 1 of their biggest tools. 1 of their biggest means to control the population. I don't think they would just be like, oh, yeah, sure. You can have that. If you look at it into 2030, 1 of their pillars for the new world order for the agenda 2030 is social media. And social credit scores, and they have specifically the Twitter logo on there. And people like to forget that this is a thing, but he was a young global leader for the World Economic Forum. So I don't think that he's the good guy that people think he is. I think he's, he's playing the part at the moment. And acquiring Twitter to me is even for selfish reasons for him. I think it has to do with his projects with transhumanism. Like he's collecting massive amounts of data on the public right now. Have you, do you know about his mother? Yeah, I've heard a little bit about her and also his babysitter. That's kind of an interesting one. I don't know if you've seen her videos. Have not. Yeah. I think they got taken off the internet at this point. Cause I was telling people to go find them and they're like, we can't find them. Her name is Rosemary. Yeah. And she claims that she was his babysitter when he was a kid, and she is telling the story about how she was babysitting him, and he I don't remember all the details, but basically would go into these, like, demonic realms with his, like, friends who were demons, and then at one point, he tried to pull her in, and it, like, Terrified her. And I guess there's talk about like the parties that his mother would go to being, not Epstein style parties, but with that crowd basically. Yeah. Interesting, interesting stuff. And I, I think part of what the babysitter was saying was that I wish I could find the videos again that he is. Sent up to be like an antichrist type figure or something like that that they chose him for that and he's been raised for that. I don't I don't quite remember but yeah, really interesting. Well, I think when you talk about that like right transhumanism which like is something that alex jones, right? has been beating on the drum of for 10 years his accuracy percentage on conspiracies to reality is so ridiculously high. That is unbelievable. And so he's been talking about the transhumanism, which is essentially the idea that humans are going to eventually turn into something other than what they are today. Right through the, whether it's through the utilization of technology, which is exactly, exactly what Elon Musk is doing, and you want to talk about the potential and I've gone back and forth on Elon Musk, right? I love the idea that Elon Musk bought X or Twitter for the, for the complete purpose of freedom of speech. But when somebody is doing something that like that, and, and you should take this ideology and utilize it in your everyday life, when somebody is going completely out of their way to do something that is completely out of the norm, that is so gracious and kind, and you should at least be a little bit skeptical as to the reason why. Just a little bit. That's not to say there's not great people out there, that's not to say that there's not nice people who are, who are maybe going to do very kind things for you above and beyond the norm of what is acceptable or appreciated today. But when somebody goes, spends 40 billion, whatever it was, 40 billion, I don't know what the figure was, something like that. Yeah. To champion freedom of speech. It's like, yes, absolutely. But there is that seed of skepticism that speaks to exactly what you're talking about, especially when the same person that's doing that is getting access to not just what you're You got to think of from his perspective, not the perspective of the user on Twitter, from his perspective, he just purchased the rights to every thought that anybody has ever posted from their fingertips. That was a direct projection from their brain into a platform. He just purchased a spreadsheet of 80 trillion thoughts, whatever the number is right. And especially when that person is going to create and did create. actively simultaneously while purchasing the rights to the freedom of speech platform also implanting microchips in people's brains yeah and and there's so many different problems with that when you take that to like the Even 10 years from now, and I think they actually ended up having some concerns about the guy that they just implanted in where they're looking at potentially pulling it out because it wasn't something that was life threatening. But that just seems like a terrible idea. So when that same person is purchasing the rights to it, let's say 5 trillion thoughts. And that same person is looking to actively insert a microchip into every person's brain and also claims that if you don't do this, you're going to get left behind, right? You're going to become obsolete. I think was the term that he's used is if you don't, if you don't combine yourself with technology, you're going to become obsolete. Maybe you should question the real reason why they're purchasing however many trillion thoughts. Yeah, and that's, that's an interesting choice of words that he used. I don't know where you stand faith wise, but the Bible specifically talks about in the end times, you're going to have to get a chip either in your forehead or in your left wrist, I believe, or left hand. It's the mark of the beast, right? Yeah, that you have to like scan or something like that in order to get food and to participate in life and culture. And then you have someone like Elon Musk, actively creating something like that. And we're starting to see, you know, the Amazon one, I was at the airport not that long ago, and they had one of those stores where you just like walk in, you know, and get what you want and leave. And you like scan your hand. I think it is crazy whole foods. Now, when I go into whole foods, you just like scan your hand. It's I don't do it, but it's, it's crazy. Is that just a California thing? That's crazy. So Amazon test piloted something just like that. And they claimed that they would use facial recognition or something to charge your account for like, and it was all AI based. Did you, did you ever hear about that? Yeah, I think that's what we're talking about. It's like one, one something. So it's different than the wrist where people would actually like have something implanted in their wrist or they would scan their palm or something like that. What this was is they claimed that it was all AI driven. They said that they, they would just basically do a facial recognition and all you had to do is scan your face into their system. But what it actually was, and they're, I believe they're getting sued for this right now. Amazon hired 25, 000 Indian dudes In a warehouse to actively watch the video surveillance footage and sit down and mark down each individual person and every purchase that they made because it was like the no checkout area. You would just fill your basket and you'd walk out and they're like, Oh, it's AI driven. And you know what they were doing is they were testing the idea, but they hired Tens of thousands of Indians in India, and they, they basically had them reading, looking at your face and trying to match it against the database of what they had and then charging you in the background. But they told everybody it was AI driven. It was like the craziest. Yeah. Yeah. A little different than risk scanning, which again is its own set of problems. But, but yeah, nonetheless, a pretty wild idea as we move into this, this You know, new era of, of AI. Well, meanwhile, it's just some guy sitting there eating chips and watching your face, looking for your social media profile to charge you or whatever. They should get sued for that. That's insane. Absolutely. Definitely false advertising, at least to say. So I have this, I've had this thought that's been lingering in my head that, that when, especially when you combine the idea of, of AI and. Faith. And so, so here's my idea. We'll see how well I can actually convey it, because it's the first time that I've said it out loud. But my idea when it comes to this is that, let, if you, if you are religious, you people out there listening, if you're listening if you are religious, Every thought that's been had ever. And, and where I stand, stand spiritually and religiously, is I, I believe in God. I believe in, I have faith in, in everything. But, but what, what my thought is, is we are just as much a part of God, right? God. We are the, the seed of God. And, and God permeates the entire universe. And every thought that you've ever had, every, every decision you've ever made has in some way, shape or form, been at least slightly. Influenced by that, that greater power. And so when we look at the way that people are using chat, GBT today for creativity, for work, for art, for anything and everything that people are util their, it's for their, how they respond to their spouse in a marriage for how they're opening up their Tinder chats. Like there's a literal chat, G-P-T-G-P-T, that is called Riz, GPT, that is the guys. Oh, no. Yes, it is a real thing. It's like the number seven GPT on the GPT marketplace right now. It's called Riz GPT. And guys are using it to respond to girls on Tinder and try to, to pick them up or whatever. So when you, when you think about the way that AI is being utilized, it is actually, and, and, and, And I think, I believe that the way that we, when I have an idea, when I have a thought, especially something that, that I think is powerful enough to act on, I believe that was given to me. I don't think I'm just this, you know, I can come up with all of these amazing creative ideas and I actually have a book somewhere. Somewhere in the big long list of books behind me, it was written by Rick Rubin, and he talks about this idea, I think it's called the creative I forget the name of it, but Rick Rubin wrote this book, it came out very recently, it's an amazing book, and it talks about the act of coming up with creative ideas, and he talks about the ether, and how you have to be open to the idea, and essentially, Be open to the idea that you need an idea and through that you will become almost like a a Receiver for ideas, right? And I think that's that's god. I think that's the universe I think that's a higher power that is giving you this gift. That is a an idea. That is a thought that is a a beautiful way of stating something that is poetry that is music that is art that is architecture that is Anything and everything that you could think of But every single one of those categories right now is being replaced by AI. When you're talking about the way that people are responding to tinder chats, when you're talking about the way that people are coming up with art with chat GPT and dolly or mid journey, there's so many Things that would have normally been pulled from that ether from the universal power from the, the, the universe from God that is now being replaced by a man made God, right? That the way that we're anything and everything that you can think of right now, people are utilizing AI and they're using it in a way that is replacing the normal openness that you would have to receive it from something that is. Good. That is the universe. That is God. And we have since replaced that openness, replaced that power with something that is man made by algorithms that are in the background being manipulated by Silicon Valley Simps, weirdos that have never had a child that won't ever have a child that don't know what it's like to be in love, that don't know what it's like to enjoy art, that have just been in Stanford University classes their entire life, and, and, Had growth every single one. Like it's, it's, so that's my idea. That's my thought that that's, it's very concerning to me that we're replacing that higher power with something that is manmade and not just manmade, but man manipulated. Yeah. It could be considered like a false God, like a golden calf. Totally. Absolutely. And I think that's, that to me is the most People are like, Oh, our jobs. It's like you're going to find a job. It's not like there's going to be 400 million homeless people in America. Eventually you're going to be able to utilize that. You know, I don't think people are going to be replaced by AI. I think people who don't use AI will be replaced by people who use AI. That's my thought when it comes to the workforce. But I do believe that the ether that the universe is you. You know, consistent flow of of ideas and creativity are absolutely going to be replaced by A. I. And what you mean by A. I. Is a man made exactly what you said. A false God that is manipulated by some 21 year old. Guy sitting in a white cubicle in San Francisco. Yeah, yeah, and I think it's also going to dumb down the population a lot. I mean, we've already seen that with the Internet coming in. I mean, today's kids, I don't mean to be disparaging, but they're not. I mean, Look at the grades and they're barely making it through high school. Like they're just not as smart as previous generations. I look back at like what my ancestors were doing. I've been doing a lot of like genealogy and family history studying. And I'm like, gosh, people were so smart back then. And they were really creative. They were like all entrepreneurs because they had to be, they could all like grow food and survive. They just had it going on. And these generations now, because we have all this technology and with the industrial revolution, everything is so easy now. And we're just kind of stupid. Like every generation gets dumber and dumber. And I really feel bad for, I mean, my future children and the generations after, like, they're not going to know how to do anything. I mean, my little sisters, like they get to look things up on Google when they don't know how to spell a word. I had to go to the dictionary and like, sound it out, you know, like, And that's just, that's not even, we're almost in the same generation, you know, but yeah, I think it's going to make people really stupid. When you go back to, let's talk about the, the, the way the Bible was written, Sir Francis Bacon you want to go back to the conversation about that, or even the constitution or the Federalist Papers, or any of those documents, it, or you, the way that The people wrote the way that people thought was so much more articulate, was so much more intelligent than the way that we speak today. You, I think, I believe it was like 1984, they, by George Orwell, the idea is that you, you dumb down language so that you dumb down the way that people think. When you talk about language, you're not just speaking about language, you're speaking about the way that you're taking thoughts within your head that the firing of those neurons and formulating them into organized thoughts that you can then convey, but you can't convey them until you have words for them. And you look at the dictionary and the amount of words that we've, we use today is a fraction of what people used back in the day. You look at even just penmanship, right? My handwriting looks like dog shit compared to all of the, like, go back and look at any signature on the Declaration of Independence, of the Constitution, of any of these things, the Federalist Papers. My, my signature. And I am probably sure any person's signature from my generation is just absolutely disgusting. They would think that we were mentally handicapped. If you put me in a time capsule and had me sign, sign the declaration of independence, they'd be like, that Austin guy was. Was he, was he like a, he was a diversity, he was a neurodivergent hire for Yeah, . Yeah, for sure. I mean, yeah. Like the way my grandparents, great-grandparents, how they sign the card. Yeah, totally. Totally different. And that speaks to like, and again, you talk about the way that people speak and the way that people write is that's just a projection of your thoughts. You look at the music industry and what's popular today. Tick tock trends like everything is slang. If you don't use slang, you're like not cool. And then I think about logos and branding, like graphic design has become so simple. And I, I'm obsessed with mid century modern design, but I think it kind of started there and it was intentional in the fifties, more so like the 60s, 70s. Yeah. Where they made everything super, super simple and minimal and everything was clean lines. And we see that I don't know if you've seen charts comparing like the high fashion houses like Balenciaga, Chanel Chloe, like how they all changed their logos to basically the same thing. Like Saint Laurent, Balenciaga, they all look the same now. It's black and white and it's simple text. It's all capitals. Very, very, like corporate, I guess, and the art is gone. Like the art and fashion, the art and architecture, all of that beauty is just gone. And it's very it's very communist Russia, if you ask me. Yeah, absolutely. It's a great way to putting it. And you, you relate that the way that logos even, I haven't really thought about that, but I know that, you know, I'm, I've been Ben in marketing before I've been a director of marketing and in several companies and the way that logos have, I haven't thought about that, but it's completely dummied down, right? It's, it all, it's all minimalist logos, right? The way that people utilize their, their brand identities today is all very, very simple. Like you said, that the color palettes of companies has been so minimized down to something so simple. Like you go back to you, you look at the way that Apple. Even you look at Nike, you look at all of the major largest corporate brands that are out there today. It's all very, very minimal, like you said, very just simple lines and simple designs and simple colors and very simple color schemes. And you mentioned something there that architecture and for some reason, this is like, One of the things that I'm so passionate about and I have no idea why at all, but architecture to me, and I think it's probably because it's around you all the time. And I point this out to people and they're like, Oh my God, you're right. And I've never thought about that. Everything that we live in today, post World War II architecture was absolutely the death of modern artistry. You, you go and everything around you, just look around you. I live in a box that has several boxes within it that it has a my computers, a box, my, the walls in front of me, the art, the everything around me is, is designed as a box. And you go to, I was actually at a I was at, a local theater show. It was, it was a large theater show. Thing, but it was like, it's at the Fox theater in Detroit and the Fox theater in Detroit. You walk in there and you see this with cathedrals. You see, I, you know, I've been to the, the, Notre, Notre Dame in Paris. And like, you go over there and you see things that were built prior to the 1930s and it absolutely blows your mind. And it's not because it's not just the visual. Aspect of what you are appreciating. It's like, it's inside of you. There's something inside of you when you're in a beautifully built Gothic cathedral or you're, you're inside of the Fox theater in Detroit or the, the, there's so many examples of this, but none of them were built post world war two. There was a absolute, that, that is. A hill I will die on the death of artistry, the death of consciousness, the death of, of, almost any artistic pursuit died in the 1940s post World War II. Everything. Yeah. If you look at the homes, like here in California, people pay insane amounts. I mean, millions and millions and millions of dollars for homes that look the same. Like you could pay 2 million for a house that looks like a house that's 10 million. It's the same black and white, 90 degree angles box, like modern box. And they all have the fireplaces that are like in the wall. And like, it just, it looks the same. Everything looks the same now. Yeah, there's no spiral staircases. There's no woodwork and wood paneling and like art, real art. And it's the death. It's not the death of art in itself. It's the death of consciousness. It's like when you sit in a box, inside of a box, inside of a box. All day, every day, and then you drive your box car to your box house, and then you fall asleep in your box bed, and then you wake up, and you take a shower in your box shower, and then you drive your box car to your box work, and it's, it's, it's literally the death of consciousness, right? Exactly, a hundred percent. Like, you talk about the death of, the death of language, the way that people spoke 200 years ago. You would be, you and I if we, if you dropped us into those, those time periods, like if we took a time capsule and pressed, you know, 1824, we would look like the biggest idiots. We look like cave, right? Exactly. And you're supposed to improve, right? You're supposed to become more intelligent. You're supposed to become more capable and, and learn from the past, but the way that they spoke, the way that they wrote, the way that they live, the way that they built architecture and everything is, is absolutely the death of, of consciousness, the death of, of art, which is just a projection of consciousness and the projection of freedom and the freedom to create things. And you look at postmodernism. If you, if you, the, the idea behind postmodernism, essentially being that there, there is no truth, right? You look at the modern art and modern art is absolutely trash. Absolutely. Exactly. Valenciaga, it was like 800 for a handbag that was a replica of a bag of trash, literally. They're just rubbing it in your face! Yeah, insane. I don't know if you've seen, there's an article and I'll probably make a video on it because it's really fascinating, written in I believe the 1800s, but it's And this man is talking about, basically old world America. So the continent of North America and how, there are all these civilizations and these incredible buildings and these really advanced intelligent people that he claims, you know, used to live here. And there's kind of a growing number of people who are, I guess, waking up to this, that there was something more here than Native Americans and tipis and primitive people. But yeah, it's really about what he says about. Old World America, and then we look at like the Chicago World's Fair, and how everything conveniently got destroyed in the fire, and we don't have any of those gorgeous buildings anymore. But when you look at pictures that were taken of those buildings, they look like they had working electricity, and they were so intricate, and so detailed, and so massive. And they supposedly went up within a couple of months during a Chicago winter. And a Chicago winter is absolutely brutal. And we're talking about people who traveled by horse and buggy, who did not have heat, and who did not have, you know, layers and layers of incredible winter clothing, like we do now, that somehow built these incredible, Buildings that look like Paris and Rome, you know in a matter of a couple of months in Chicago, but they weren't smart enough to like, make a car back then. Yeah, and it's especially during the winter. There's, there's absolutely zero way. Like I said, I live in the Midwest and there's, there's no way. There's absolutely no way that modern society, they, they, they stop. They actually have frost rules. So if you live in a cold area, like the Midwest, you cannot build at all. You can't, they won't let you with modern construction, with all of the tools and the machinery that we have today, there is a certain amount of months per year where you literally are. You cannot build it's illegal to build because there's frost rules because the ground is is so hard and hard too hard for the modern machinery or whatever it's for the government to allow you to build, which I don't know why they care, but yeah, absolutely unbelievable. Yeah, so apparently these, these primitive people who grew potatoes knew how to do all this. And then of course it gets destroyed. And I think it's kind of a deliberate, some people call it like a reset. And I think it's a deliberate destruction of that beauty and kind of the dumbing down of the people because it makes us a lot easier to control. And I see that happening again with mid century modern. As much as I love mid century modern design, I think they did it again. Then where they're kind of erasing like the beauty and the art, and they're giving us a lot of geometry and clean lines, circles, squares, triangles. But yeah, it's very interesting. Yeah. And, and when you speak about that, you can almost, you can go back thousands of years and feel the same way when you go look at ancient Egypt. You look at the architecture that they had then, we talk about Chicago, hundreds of years ago, talk about Egypt, thousands of years ago, we still have no idea, we still have no idea how they built the, the, the, the pyramids, how they built the chambers within them, how they built the, the tunnels underneath them, I think there was, there was an article that just came out, I believe today, that was about how there was a, a Finding of a new, underground tunnel system that they believe could potentially lead them to the tomb of Cleopatra. And yes, just today, I'm pretty sure. And, and so, but, but they still don't know how these tunnels were built. They would not be able to build these tunnels today. And that's almost every single part of ancient Egypt. And so you have these people coming out, these, these you know, these archeologists, and he talked about how there's absolutely Zero way that modern technology would be able to build the pyramids as we know them today. The, the, the amount of precision of architecture, the way that they, they cut these blocks and allegedly dragged them thousands of miles. And, and then, you know, so, so you go, you talk about architecture and you talk about the, the elimination of, I don't know, almost like, of Of questioning these narratives, they want to stifle these ideas so much, whether it's hundreds of years ago, or whether it's thousands of years ago, they just want you to live in your box. They don't want you to question why you live in your box or why there's just right angles everywhere around you. That stifles creativity. It's it's a continuation exactly of what you saw within to bring up 1984 again. The dwindling down of language to something that is verbally diminishing consciousness, it's, it's aesthetically diminishing consciousness in the same exact way. So if you can do that to the, to, to the, the surrounding areas that you're in constantly to the, the thoughts that you're able to, to come up with from, from the, you know, that, that ether, that God, that, that universal. Ideas that that are dropped and planted into your brain. If you can make the individual that the language that they are only able to convey them through as simple as possible, then then that person to your point is much more easy to manipulate. They're much more easy to make them just, you know, toe the line of what's accepted and not push back against the institutions that are there, you know, around them all the time that want them to do X, Y, and Z along the way, right? And so it's, it's, it's language, it's aesthetics, it's, it's art, it's creativity, it's entrepreneurship. It's, it's absolutely unbelievable. The amount of ways that we have been manipulated into simplicity. Yeah. Yeah. It's almost, it makes you numb kind of you're numb and you're very susceptible to whatever they want to tell you. And I don't know if you've heard of cymatics, it's the study of how frequency affects water. If you look, yeah, I think I've heard of it. Like, I think I saw like a video on it at one point. Where I saw this like lady talking about it, but it was like the old Twitter, maybe five years ago. But yeah, absolutely. It's it go ahead interesting. So you can affect the molecules of water with different frequencies. So music, even words spoken, and you can look up experiments that they've done on this and you can see like when negative words are spoken over the water, how it destroys the water molecules versus positive words or songs like, What did they use? Oh, imagine by the Beatles or whatever. John Lennon. Yeah, so really interesting. But if you look at these pictures of these water molecules that are affected by positive frequencies, they look exactly like cathedral windows in like all across Europe. It's really fascinating. And I'm gonna post something about it soon. But yeah, so it kind of gets you thinking like, People back in the day, they knew something about this. Like they were very in tune with frequency and what was going on. I don't know if they knew about cymatics necessarily, but there was something to that. I don't know if you've heard of the Coral Castle down in Florida. That's an interesting one. Apparently he, people think he moved these huge massive stones. It was one man who created this garden out of rocks. And The theory is that he moved them with frequency, and they demonstrated in a lab that you can pick things up and move them with frequency. They're doing it with like water droplets and really small things. But a lot of people think that this wasn't just the way that the Coral Castle was built, but also possibly things in Egypt as well. I did a video on Egypt a while ago where I broke down like the official theory for the pyramids. They would have to move these, I think they're like 80 ton blocks. Each one, I think it's 500 miles from the quarry where they said that they, they got the blocks across the desert, put them into place in two minutes. You're going to move this giant block 500 miles and put it into place in two minutes and you have to do that 24 hour. I think it's no, it's 10 hours a day for 20 years. You would have had to do that in order to finish the pyramids on time, according to the official timeline, the official story. So, yeah, it's possible to use frequency to build these things and they obviously knew a lot more than we do. And there was a, there was a video that came out, I think where if you've ever seen the one where somebody claps, like if they clap in front of this Mayan temple down in South America, that it creates this like super weird, frequency that it, that it creates. puts back on you. That sounds like I forget what it is, but it's, it's a really, the, the way that they understood frequencies hundreds, hundreds, thousands of years ago is absolutely unbelievable. And the way that they were able to utilize them, that that's almost every single theory. When you look at the people who are really at the mainstream I guess mainstream is not the right term, but like the mainstream of the non mainstream is the idea is that the frequencies, the vibrational, the utilization of those frequencies is the way that they were able to do a lot of the things that they were, that they did, that we cannot explain today, which takes you to the idea that, you know, the lost civilization and lost technology, even if you go back several hundred years ago, you have Nikola Tesla. Nikolai Tesla created tons of technology, some of which you can't even learn about today, some of which they isn't, isn't spoken about today. And a lot of it had to do with the frequencies had to do with the way to utilize vibration and sound to manipulate the world around us. And so many people believe in, in, in. You have to understand that that the timeline that we're on, the reality that we're on today could have went hundreds of millions of directions, the, the, the people that we had a part of the American population, a part of the world population out of all of the potential. Sperm that could have created the world around us today. It's a very, very, very specifically small group from the group of potential beings that could have been here today. And so, when you look at the science that has been created, the, the person, the very, very small percentage of people that. Became people from sperm, the very, very small percentage of people that were born that went into science and the very, very small percentage of scientists that created the science as we know it today, you're talking about hundreds of people, not, not thousands, not hundreds of thousands, not tens of thousands, not millions. You're talking about maybe. The people that have created the world around us, the technology, the cameras, the phones that like really the core technology that created those things. You're talking about 50, 100, 200 people that created the core technologies that we know them today and of the millions of potential people, the hundreds of thousands of sperm that decided to be the one or two to 200 people that we're talking about that created the scientists that created the universe around us as we know it today, there could have been Thousands of other people in their position, and there was those thousands of other people in those positions that created the science that we knew prior, that was far different than the timeline that we found us on, we found ourselves on today, that is, electricity, that is, you know, the gas stove that you use, and the microwaves, and the cell phones, and the this and the that, that you know today, it could have been a completely One small scientist, one individual scientist could have completely off railed us from the technological advancements as we know them today to where we wouldn't be sitting having this conversation this way, and we wouldn't have the electricity that we have around them, but it would have been replaced by some other idea In some other way, just like what we're talking about, that is the lost technology of ancient Egypt and, and all of the, the, the things that we don't know about as a result of things like the, the burning of the library of Alexandria. Yeah, oh, yeah, that's pretty crazy. There are a lot of people who actually think that the pyramids were used as, power plants essentially, and that our form of electricity that we use today is actually like a primitive form of electricity. And I would honestly agree with that. If we look at what Tesla did with Wardenclyffe tower, you know, he was harnessing energy from the earth and using it to transmit messages and images to ships all the way out at the Atlantic, you know, in the Atlantic Ocean. And he wanted to power up New York City with this clean, sustainable energy from the earth, and J. P. Morgan said nope, and he pulled his funding, and the tower was destroyed two years later. And you don't hear about that in school, you just hear Thomas Edison invented the light bulb, which actually, that was more so like Tesla's invention than Edison's, but Yeah, I think we're, we're living with primitive technology compared to what people had back in the day. Yeah, absolutely. And that's like so many people are looking at what Tesla did now and like some of the schematics that were left around and things like that, but you pointed to it exactly, which is that Thomas Edison took essentially complete Responsibility himself for all of the work of, I believe he hired Nikolai Tesla as his, like basically his intern and Tesla died broke and like had no money, no fame to his name. And essentially Thomas Edison utilized him as a pawn to steal all of Tesla's work and, and determined to utilize, I think, what, what was the. Certain type of like, luminescent metal or whatever it is that makes up our electricity today. And that's how stupid we are. I don't know how my house is, is, is lit up today. Like we're so, so primitive. We're so dumb that we just expect all of these things to work when we want them to work. And we just expect that daddy government's always going to take care of us. And whatever energy company that's out there just magically creates light. Around you. It's like, it's not God said, let there be light. It's whatever energy company is around you today is, is that that entity that, that just, you don't have to know. We got it. Don't worry about it. And if there's a complete failure of the electronic or the power grid. Well, good luck. You better have a lot of bullets or food. Yeah. Not our problem. And there's so many people like there's been so many movies lately, right? That the Obama movie that, that, that he helped write that talked about the EM, the, the, the difficulties that you would run into if there was an EMP or like a triple apocalypse or, and I don't think too many people realize how quickly we could devolve into chaos. Oh, yeah. Lord of the Flats. Like, a hundred percent. Even the, the Northern Lights that we've been seeing over the last few days. So many people have speculated. And I don't think I've jumped on this train quite yet. You know, we, me and my wife went outside and like, used, I was able to actually see it with my eyes. My wife had to use her phone, but she got some amazing pictures of the Northern Lights. And again, we're in the Midwest, so not that crazy, but there were some people in Florida. We're done. It doesn't make any sense at all that you should be able to see these. And so some people were speculating that it was, you know, potentially all of these, you know, was the government operation, was the aliens, what is this? Was it that right? But how quickly. Some people were saying that even just a, a natural event, just a natural event, like the northern lights or the solar flares that was causing it. And I guess the idea behind that, the scientific the scientific explanation was that, was that there was a, a essentially two large areas of the sun that combined into one that was 16 times the size of the earth that started to emit the, the solar flare energy that caused the northern lights to be able to be seen. All across the globe, or so they say exactly, but and so even that they were saying a natural event, a natural event could have been the cause of, well, you might, you might just not be able to call your mom or your grandma, you might your electricity might go out your this, your that all of these things. Don't worry about it. But if it happens, you know, It's because of the sun. Yeah, it's not our fault. Absolutely. It has nothing to do with us. But how could, even if, even if it's natural, even if it's natural, which it's highly likely that if we do end up in some sort of scenario where there's lack of communication or our, our 5G towers, God forbid, don't work the way that they were intended. That it's, you know, if that does happen, The, we saw it with the toilet paper, people get very primitive, very quickly. There is so much that if, if our, in, I am guilty of this too. If my cell phone stopped working tomorrow. Like, I would be driving to my parents house, going to check on my grandparents, like, it would very quickly devolve into chaos. Just think about this. If all of the, the, the, the grid goes down tomorrow, and the grocery stores cannot turn their power on, guess what they're doing? They're closing their doors. Guess what your fridge is doing? Your fridge isn't going to work. And all of your food's going to go bad in two to three days. And if your food goes bad in two to three days, and your grocery stores are shut down, Just, just ask yourself that question. Then what, what am I going to do? Then two to three days. In Texas, our water worked off of the electricity. So we don't have water when we don't have electricity either. So unless you have a well and you have a backstock of food, good luck. And what type of, we, again, there was people fist fighting over, toilet paper. Yeah, this fighting over toilet paper. Now, imagine if that was water. And I actually remember when you talk about coven. I actually remember going to the local store and buying the big jugs of water. Like, with that idea in mind, I bought, like, Five or 10 jugs of water that I stuffed in the back of my car just in case. But it wasn't even a conversation then it was toilet paper, right? People were fighting at Costco over toilet paper and that, and that's not even a daily necessity. Like, I'm sorry, you can figure something out, grab a towel. Yeah, about the toilet paper thing, like why toilet paper, we laugh about it, but I almost feel like, I did kind of like a deep dive into all of these different patents that the U. S. government has on, what do they call it, voice to school technology, basically ways that they can communicate. With your brain ways that they can change the frequencies in your brain, all that kind of really weird stuff. All of this stuff is patented. It's public information. Really fascinating, but they can actually implant ideas into your head. So did they start this where they were like, get toilet paper, you know, like did they send them 5g towers and everyone went crazy over the toilet paper. So weird. Yeah, and you look at it. So, so there's actually so even if let's let's just say it was a real shortage, right? Let's just assume that when it's very, very easy to that for them to disrupt the supply chain, right? It's very, very easy for them to disrupt this. The supply chain, the amount of people that were running to the store based off of propaganda. All you need. All you need is every major Costco to not have toilet paper for then all of the Winn Dixie's around you, all of the Kroger's, everybody that's around you is going to start sprinting to the store, right? But then, then you get into what you're talking about, right? I think, I think there was a recent hearing about like last, within the last week, there was a hearing where they brought in the CIA and they talked to them about the, the more recent utilization and weaponization of, of the technology that you're talking about. And they talked to them about what used to be called Havana syndrome. You heard of that before? So Havana syndrome was you go back to the utilization of this during like the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union back in the day. And you can look this up, CIA. gov, their reading room right now. And you can look at the weapons that they utilize to basically attack and disrupt the frequencies within your brain. And they, they created essentially like these like ray guns, like alien style ray guns that, that could shoot these signals at you and cause you to go crazy. That way they verbatim last week said that they could make you see things that they can make you hear things that they could change the thoughts that were within your head to be positive. Or negative utilizing this technology. And just think of the implications of that today. We're not talking about when you have a, a, a brain, a Elon Musk chip in your brain that they can then just go to their computer and go to a drop down menu and say, Hey, I want Brianna or I want Austin to be super pessimistic or, or not even that I want every 24 to 35 year old white person to become hyper aggressive. Just for a week, and then next week, we'll turn it off. Well, whatever you there's so many things that you could do with that technology. But even as we know it today, they're able to weaponize and manipulate human consciousness. The way that the good Lord, the earth, the universe created it today without a brain implant in there, not only being able to manipulate your thoughts, but being able to track Every single thought that you make at every single point of the day, they know when you're hungry, they know when you're happy, they know when you're mad, they know when you're horny, they know when you're, when you're thirsty, they know every single thing about you all the time, every day at all times and guess what? They're going to sell that data to every company that's around you. And then guess what? They're going to project an advertisement in your brain. I think it was, it might've been like the, the minority report or something. They, they showed the way that they would, they would basically, there was no real like billboards. But the every billboard, every, every thing that you would drive past would have a, it was actually a, a TV show on Netflix called carbon, carbon fiber or something, carbon something. And they, they had this chip in your head that I talk about in this show and everything that you would walk past would be a personalized advertisement in real. Life that was specifically created for you. You walk down New York City, every billboard, every building, every screen, every everything that around you is completely curated to your thought processes and made it. It's exactly. It's terrible, right? And again, what are the implications of that? Yeah, I don't know if this is going on YouTube, so I want to like censor myself, but the offing events that happen at schools, often, I was reading a post, this woman was talking about how all of these, characters who do this, report having voices in their head, telling them that they have to do this in order to make the voice go away and to feel okay again. And so they go do this. And so I thought that was like a little, it was a little out there. Like I need some proof for that. So then I was going through this list of it's probably like 100 different patents of this voice to school technology. And sure enough, there's a patent in there that it works by, so they need your DNA, which they can get from a piece of trash and your trash can out front or anything really. And then they can program using your DNA, their voice to only reach like your thoughts, basically. And Through frequency, and so they can speak to you. So some guy from the CIA or the FBI is, you know, on a mic speaking into your brain, telling you that you have to go commit this horrible act in order to get the voices to go away. And so you feel crazy. And so you go do this thing, and then you end your own life and, The story dies with you, but it's crazy. Cause this technology actually exists and it kind of makes me think about like, what about Trump supporters in the future? And like, how are they going to target us? You know, with deep fakes and with voice to school technology. And I don't know, it's a weird world we're living in. It's crazy, right? And you think about 10 years from now and it gets into wild territory. But even what you're talking about today that most people aren't familiar with, and I'm not familiar with some of it, but it makes perfect sense to me. Even if let's go to the, let's go to the very, very generous side of that, which is psychological medications, the, the anti psychotics. Almost 85 plus percent of people are taking when they commit those unaliving events that you're talking about at the school systems. Almost every single case, almost every single case, they're taking anti psychotics and if you just look at it as biological, there is a, there is a switch inside of your brain that says, I would never commit this atrocious act. Even if you want to talk about like what we used to do back in the day, well, there was, there was a lot of murder. There was a lot of war. There was a lot of rape. There was a lot of pillaging. There's all these horrible things. Absolutely. For sure. People and humans are capable of very, very bad things on their own without psychological medications or without technology that manipulates their, their thoughts, absolutely capable of those things. But when you look at the effect of psychological medications and that, that, that switch in your brain that says, I would never go do this to children, I would never go do this to innocent civilians, I would never go do this to X, Y and Z fill in the blank. There is a switch in your brain that has to be muted, completely silenced. The same way that when you become hyper, hyper majorly depressed, that there's a switch in your brain that says, don't kill yourself. Don't don't commit suicide. Don't do this terrible, atrocious thing. There's better things on the side of tomorrow that you have to look forward to. There's a switch in your brain that says, don't do this thing. And the psychological antipsychotics and medications actually have on the label. Not only that you're far more likely, like very, very statistically far more likely to commit suicide, but you're also far more likely to commit these types of atrocious acts. So then, then 85 percent of people not only have committed anti or utilize anti psychotics and are being, let's say, mute, just mute that, just mute that switch in your brain. But then you start to. utilize modern technology by finding these people who are on anti psychotics on forums like reddit and you have the CIA or the FBI that goes in there and starts to manipulate those people and then guess what they have to show up at their door a weapon that they can use right and and that's like just what you said that's like old news That's not even that serious. Like just being able to go on Reddit and start messaging somebody or just starting to push anti psychotic medications and then manipulate the person who's taking them to commit these acts. That's old news. There's. Like you said, exactly patents out there today that showed those types of things that that can be utilized to not only, you know, take that muted person, manipulate their thoughts through through forums, but also in real life implant ideas that will, you know, Make them commit acts that they would have never as a human being be capable of committing on their own today. Yeah. Yeah. Wild stuff. It's crazy, right? And it's just getting crazier. And then, and then you want to tell me that the only way that I can keep up with the Joneses is by taking Elon Musk's Neuralink, a chip. Oh, thank you. And implanting it in my brain. So that you can have complete wifi access to every thought that I've ever had. And not even have to utilize the technology that you're talking about. It just, it's so much more dystopian. Like, like the technology that you're talking about isn't even enough for them. We have to take it a step further. Yeah, exactly. To my brain and get me to do things. You have to be like, And you have to be part of my mind. Real time, real time feeds. Like, I don't want to have to be within a hundred meters of you to be able to manipulate you. I want to be sitting at a desk in Silicon Valley or in Washington, D. C. in some bunker in the CIA. They're AirPods, I think they're called, right? I don't have them. They just patented new technology for AirPods to read your brainwaves. So it's reading your mind while it's in your, in your school. Insane. Insane. It's crazy. And so, so I just, I just went into like a new endeavor. I talked about how I'm entrepreneur, right? And so there's been a lot of conversations around the manipulation and weaponization of EMF frequencies. And that's what you're talking about. Like when everybody's talking about EMF, wifi radiation, poisoning, and the cancer being caused by your cell phone overuse and how you should turn off your wifi at night, there's, there's a lot of conversations about those things. And so, so I actually, the hat that I'm wearing on my head is actually a sample of the very first, one of the very first products that I'm coming out with for a company called Ronin. And what we're doing is there's a silver lined fabric. So there's something called Faraday goods and Faraday material is a silver lined fabric that you can actually interweave into the materials of your everyday shirts, hats, everything that you wear on a daily basis. And you can actually basically create a barrier between you and what that type of technology can do. So most people aren't aware of it. There is actually some type of material. It's a little expensive compared to everyday things. But if you're concerned about those things, and then a lot of people are just concerned about the regular AirPods. The, the, the amount of different, like the, the health effects of regular AirPods and then you see that, yeah, I saw like just a really super brief Instagram post by somebody that posted about that. What do you need to read my brainwaves for? Like you're already, you're already predicting basically everything that I would want to buy ever already at 75 to 80 percent accuracy. Yeah. What do you need access to my brain frequencies for? And how, how are you going to utilize that? Not even you. Let's say like, and I mean you by Apple, not you specifically, but right. But how, how is Apple going to utilize that? But also how is Apple going to monetize that data beyond themselves? I don't think I'm, I'm not concerned about Apple taking my brainwave frequencies and trying to sell me a newer Mac because I thought about it. Yeah. Yeah, for sure. I have, I have one of those, the blankets you're talking about and I put it on my lap when I have to like work on my laptop or edit. Yeah. They're pretty cool. Yeah, absolutely. And it's, it's something that like most people are not aware about the technology and it's not like not even technology. It's, it's just literally a certain type of fabric and it's a certain type of fabric that's not created for everything. You know, the way that I came up with it was I actually heard on a, on a podcast through RFK. So Robert F. Kennedy jr. Talked about the, the wifi radiation poisoning that he was actually litigating against a lot of people where there was people coming to him and saying that, you know, they had this certain type of a very aggressive cancer that was in their brain. And it was a result of after they did so many studies, finding out that people were holding their phones up to their head, which you should never do as people hopefully know now, you shouldn't hold your phone up to your head. You should put it on speaker. You should use. Wired headphones, whatever, but he found that that people who held their phone up to their head a certain amount of hours per day were far more likely to get this certain type of cancer. Yeah. And so we started litigating consistently against this, this, what he called either wifi radiation poisoning, 5g radiation poisoning and emf radiation poisoning. What most people don't know. And once you see it, you cannot unsee it. I, I feel crazy because like when I'm microwaving my food now, I stand like 10 feet away from the microwave. I, I just, there's no, but when you realize that you put your food in this magical box. And you shut the magical door and you press the magical button, your food magically heats up. I don't know what the hell is going on there. I don't, all I'm told is that it's a magical box that you press a magical button and your food magically heats up. Well, what's happening there? What is the science behind it? What does that do to me? What does that do to my food? What does that do to the plate? What does that do to everything around you? And you don't know. You're not supposed to know. But you know what you're supposed to do? You're supposed to buy the microwave and you're supposed to heat up your food. Don't ask questions. Hold your cell phone up to your ear. You should keep your Wi Fi on at night and don't worry about it. We got you. Of course we care about your health and safety. We're the government, right? But what they don't tell you is that the people that are responsible for the, the determining of how, like what level of EMF radiation is allowable. There's actually a governing body surrounding this, which is maybe a little bit, but that's encouraging to know there's a, there's a, there's six people that line the board of this, this board essentially within the government that determine the amount of allowable EMS with it. There's a certain level of threshold that you cannot pass or else you won't be allowed to sell it commercially, but five of six of the people on that government board. Are also board members or high level executives of telecommunication companies? Yes. Yeah. And I think it's something like, I think it's over a trillion dollars that built big telecom, like lobbies Congress with every year and all of the information, all the studies get buried. There's over 10, 000 peer reviewed studies that demonstrate harm to humans. And all of that gets buried because Big Telcom is putting massive amounts of money behind this. And like you said, five out of six Big Telcom employees. Elon Musk, he went on Joe Rogan's podcast and Rogan was questioning him about the EMFs because of Starlink. And he straight up said, it's not a concern. You can wear a head, I think he said a helmet full of, Cell phones and be totally fine. You're not going to get cancer. You're not going to have any issues. And we know like scientifically, we know that that is not true. But him along with our government, like they're all just working together to push these technologies. But I think the bubble's kind of bursting. I think people are waking up. I think it's the, and this is the reason that I started my company. So, so the company is called Ronan Basics. It's going to come out. I have several products that are available right now. But the reason that I started this is because the conversation started to become very, very consistent in, in a lot of different individuals, whether it's RF, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whether it's Joe Rogan, whether it's Tim Ferriss, whether it's Andrew Huberman, but there's so many. People that are out there speaking this, this, this truth today that weren't doing it three months ago, right? It's becoming one of the most consistent things I'm seeing on X. I'm seeing all these viral posts showing the amount of EMS being emitted from your, your laptop, right? There's, there's so many consistent conversations happening about this. So when I saw this. I think six months ago when I started my endeavor in this, I went out and I looked, there's one company out there that really does the EMF hats. There's one or two, maybe three companies that does the backpacks. There's one to two companies that does the phone sleeves and the laptop sleeves. Every one of them is so ridiculously priced and expensive, and there's no reason for it. So I was like, And again, by the way, all of it looks like shit. So it's like, so having, exactly. So having my background, so I was like, well, let me just see what I can do. I think this is a great opportunity to solve a real problem and to create a product that. You know, especially in the apparel world, there's not too many problems that you can actually solve with a hat or clothing or a backpack or things like that. And I was like, this seems like a great opportunity to create a great product is actually affordable for people. The hats that people are buying right now from the company That's crazy. The average person spend that in this economy, a 90 hat, and it looks like shit, I would never wear it. I would absolutely never wear this hat. So I was like, there's gotta be a way. So I started to look at sourcing manufacturers and started to talk to people and source the fabric and do all these things and I was like, all right, so I'm, I think I'm onto something. So keep an eye out for that. But, but the idea is that there's, there's. Very real threats that are around us because of modern technology, and here's the question I would pose to anybody that's out there today. If every, let's just say the government, if the government found out tomorrow, every single cancer patient that died was a result of modern technology was a result of the frequencies that are being emitted from your cell phone. I'm not saying this is the case. I'm just giving you a thought experiment. If you found out You know, let's start with the government. If the government found out that every single cancer patient that died was a result of modern technology, do you believe? That they would be capable of making the decision to say, We are cutting off all of your cell phones were cutting off all of your your Wi Fi. We are not going to do this because we know it's killing. It's the number two cause of death in the United States today, right? Cancer. We're no longer going to allow telecommunications companies to offer Wi Fi to offer 5G to offer cell phones to offer any of this modern technology. We're going to have to figure out another way. Do you believe? Tomorrow, they would make the decision to shut that down, or do you think they would stifle that conversation, stifle that science to allow us to continue down this trajectory? I think we know the answer. We absolutely know the answer. Now, I even want to pose this to people, because I would be conflicted with this as well. If you knew, if I knew, that every cancer patient that ever died, that ever got cancer was the result of modern technology, you as a person, me as a person, a father, Of three children. Would I stop all of my families, all of my own technological use as a result of that information? I don't know. And that's a very conflicting position to find yourself in. Like, do you really believe that you would be capable? Would you be mentally strong enough? Would you be able to, you know, I could tell you confidently my answer would be no, I wouldn't stop immediately because my job depends on my ability to utilize internet. My job depends on my ability to use my cell phone. My job depends on all of these things, right? My, my family being able to eat, right? My family's going to die much quicker from not being able to eat and from being able to drink water because I can't pay the water bill if I lose my job because I can't pay for their food or their water. So it's interwoven into our society to the extent that regardless of the information that came out, even if we found out tomorrow that 50, 30, 30 to 50 percent of people that utilize technology every single day, more than four hours a day, which is far more or far less than the average person utilizes their cell phone. If you're in Gen Z or millennials. Even if we found that out tomorrow, I'm not convinced at all that even 10%, even 5%, even 1 percent of people would stop their use of modern technology as a result of that information. And just like a, a, I don't know, an alcoholic who, who starts to make those realizations finds it out. I think we're far more addicted to technology. We're far more addicted to social media. We're far more addicted to, to doom scrolling on our phones than we are to the, the to the idea that we are actually wanting to do what's best for our bodies, what's best for our minds. And so I don't know where we go from here other than trying to find solutions. Like actually making those Faraday products mainstream, actually creating anti technology tools that you can leverage to mitigate those things. And it's not just Faraday goods. It's not just the silver line fabrics. There's some like quite expensive electronic devices, which I guess. I don't know how that works out. That will mitigate EMFs, but it's a, it's a very consistent conversation that I think people should hopefully start having within their families and their communities. And we should at least start to bring awareness to it, because I think that's the number one thing to, to solving almost any issue. Yeah, and I agree with you 100%. I think people would give up alcohol and junk food before they gave up their doom scrolling and their social media and technology. 100%, right? We're, we're way more addicted, way more addicted to Instagram and X and TikTok than we are to literally any other substance on this earth today. And. The effects of TikTok and Instagram and X are not nearly that of the actual physical effects of the frequencies that are being emitted as a result of the utilization so close to your body. Mm hmm. Yeah. So, so it's, it's an interesting rabbit hole to go down. I don't think most people are ready for that conversation, but I do think that there are some real, you know, go buy the 90 hats. I don't care. Go buy the, the, the, the 200 phone sleeve. I don't care, but at least be aware of the idea that these things are out there that can help you solve this issue. And if there's a company out there. There's a company out there that can help you solve that issue at a much lower cost, you know, definitely, definitely pursue it because I think it's a worthwhile endeavor to start to wake up to those ideas. And I think that just as we've seen with covid, just as we've seen with, the pharmaceutical industry, that the military industrial complex, there is a telecommunications industrial complex that is out there right now, lobbying, like you said, billions of dollars. Billions of dollars to try to, to, to manipulate you into believing that these, this is not an issue, but there's a lot of studies out there, a lot of studies out there, and there's far more being conducted today and tomorrow than have been conducted in the past. But there's a lot of studies out there that show that there is a serious correlation and causation between the technology that you use and the health outcomes that you have. Absolutely. Let me know when you're ready to drop your company. I'll happily promote it. I got you. So, so one of the things that I've seen you talk about, Brianna, a few times is the, is the moon landing, right? Oh yeah. The, the, the, the very convincing, Video evidence that we have seen from the United States of America, NASA program. So speaking about the, the, you know, the, the tarnishment of, of legitimacy within our institutions today, as we know them, what caused you to question the moon landing, like, what are the main, like, you have to point to two to three things. That's like, here's what, here's what made me believe this is absolute horseshit. What made you think that? As you know, I've seen several of your videos and they're very convincing. Thanks. Yeah, you know, there's a long list of things that are inconsistent about the moon landing. And this is so controversial. Like people want to fight you on this. They get really emotional because it's, it's like supposed to be this epitome of American excellence and American innovation and this wonderful milestone in our history. And they don't want that illusion shattered. But one of the main things is the fact that we had, I believe it was a zero. 0. 17 percent chance of getting past the Van Allen radiation belt, even with all of the quote unquote protections that they put on the ship and somehow we made it through and the explanation given, I dug and I dug and I tried to find like a scientific explanation for how they got past the radiation belt. They say. We went fast, which is just absurd. Like, oh, okay, sure. You went fast. But you know, we have, I forget his name, but he's one of the astronauts at the international space station. And he slips that we haven't even made it past low earth orbit ever. And so there's things like that all over the place. There was a video that came out from NASA not that long ago talking about they don't even know how to get past the radiation belt yet with, without people, with just their, their technology, their ships. So yeah, a lot of inconsistencies there. I think the footage would have been very easy for them to create in the film studio. It's super primitive. It's super fuzzy. It's, you know, people say if you speed it up, it looks like they're walking at normal speed. Yeah, yeah, it's, it's an interesting one for sure. A hundred percent. So the Van Allen radiation belt. So the idea behind that, that NASA gave is they said that it's a lost technology. That was their response because when people ask them, why have we not gotten to the moon recently? And why is this Van Allen Radiation Belt an issue today compared to what it was in the 1970s and 80s? Why is this an issue and why were we able to overcome it 50 years ago? And why are we not able to come it over to able to overcome it today? They say that, well, we lost the technology. We lost the schematics. We don't have the capabilities of doing what we did 40 years ago. You know, back when. We used to use a, you know, what was it like a tin can and a string to talk to each other before it's modern cell phones. You want to convince me you want, they think we're so stupid that that's really the, you saw that with covid, you see it with with the moon landing. There's so many other examples of this, but, but. The way that they try to talk to you about the Van Allen Radiation Belt, and I'm not intelligent enough when it comes to space to be able to explain it very well, but people should go look it up. It's essentially a certain altitude that you go past the atmosphere that causes all of the, I'm sure it's like the instrumentation and the capabilities of actually surpassing this to be able to continue past this certain altitude above the atmosphere to allow them to actually reach that. And to your point, they basically state that, eh, we don't know, right? Like they didn't, they didn't have unbelievable documentation and everything surrounding the, the, the actual, building and infrastructure that went into creating the moon landing. And, and so, yeah, it's, it's so crazy to me that they want to try to continue the lie. It's like, it's like abusive spouse. that, that tries to like gaslight you enough into thinking that you're really, really dumb to think that I was cheating on you for so long. But, but really you like knocked on the window of the car and saw them in there together, but they're trying to gaslight you into believing that that's not really what happened and you were dreaming, right? It's so insulting to think that and like, if we were able to make it to the moon and you actually saw there was a The guy named his last name's Sibrell. He's like the number one guy when it comes to the moon landing. He's done a ton of research on it. And he actually got punched in the face, punched in the face by, I don't, it wasn't Lance arm, it wasn't Lance Aldrin, right? Yes. Buzz Aldrin. Thank you. Buzz Aldrin. Punched him in the face. I think it was like the late 90s or the early 2000s when he was doing this deep dive into the moon landing. And he went up to him and said, I want you to swear on this Bible. I have a Bible right here. I want you to swear on it. And he just gets punched right in the face as a result of going up to this guy and, and trying to like, have him just swear on the Bible. Just, you know, get to convince me like every other lawyer has done. put their hand on the Bible and lied to me before in a legal setting. He couldn't do it. He chose violence instead of, of telling the, the, the mistruth, which is that we weren't capable of going back then, which is what it absolutely appears to be. All of the, the, the footage that was essentially propaganda that they pushed out as a result was faked. And you see that by all of the evidence that is presented between the, the, the shadows of the, the light that's intersecting between the, you know, I, I even saw something today before we, we had this conversation that was there was like a fly that people zoom in on, on the moon lander. There was a community notes around that, to be fair. So I'll, I'll give you, I'll give you that. But it said it was fake, but, but again, there's so much weirdness around the moon landing, and I don't think, like, why, why do you think that is? Why do you think that we went to the extent that we did, if it is fake? Let's just say it's fake, and let's, let's accept that. Why do you think the government would do that? I mean, it was thought at the time that whoever got to the moon first would win the Cold War. So there was sufficient motivation to get up there first and intimidate, you know, Russia by saying we're going to put weapons or there was, there was sufficient motivation to get to the moon first. So I think that was probably it. I think everyone in power probably was in on it. And knew what was going on. And I think NASA, you know, like the only stupid people are us, the people like we're, we're the ones that are always out of the joke, but, I mean, I'm, I'm sure everyone, I think the reason they probably get so angry, angry to the point of punching people who ask questions is because Not because they're hurt that someone would ask that question or frustrated their work is delegitimized, but because it's like a sore subject, they've been keeping this secret for so many years. My great grandpa was actually friends with Buzz Aldrin. I never met him obviously, but I wish I could have, I'd have some questions for him. That's crazy. Yeah. So, so you, you alluded to it right there. It's like the cold war was an interesting time. And what a weird flex, like, yeah, it's like you're going to get into a fist fight with another kid and in middle school and you're like, well, I bet you I can race you to the that the store down the road and get back before you can yeah, you have your like mom Photoshop and image of you. Selfie ing next to the store instead of actually like racing 25 miles down the road. It's, it's such a weird flex. Like, why was that the thing that people wanted to do that proved that we were substantially technologically advanced more than the Soviet Union? Yeah, I think it was. I think it was the Russians thought that they would put weapons on the moon, right? If the Russians got to the moon, they'd put space weapons up there and they'd win the Cold War. Which obviously no one's put weapons on the moon. I don't think we've been to the moon. But yeah, I think that was the thought at the time. It seems like we probably should have spent that money. Elsewhere, like, like again, it just goes back to the weird flex conversation. Like it just, it makes literally no sense why that was the, that was the weird cold war. Like it wasn't like creating a new technology. It was like, I bet you, I can race you to that fence and back faster. Only that fence is in Italy. And you'd actually have to swim across the Atlantic ocean to get there. And everybody knows that you can't actually do that. Yeah. Yeah, and also like, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think any other nation has put a quote human on the moon before like it's just us still all these years later and the Apollo program and we lost the technology and we lost the tapes and like what it's insane that anyone actually believes it happened 50 years ago. It's like the RF, like the, the, the Kennedy assassination. It's like, we didn't do that, but we're also not going to release any of the information surrounding it. Yeah, we didn't do it, but we're not going to clear our names. Exactly. We're not going to convince you, but we're going to tell you, and you're going to believe us that we didn't do that. But we did do this thing and we're going to tell you and you're going to believe us, but don't question it because if you do, we're going to call you a conspiracy theorist. And so you, you see like Elon Musk trying to get to Mars and you see the way that he, he tries to frame it as the, the colonization of Mars for the purpose of mitigating catastrophes for the human species. Yeah, and I think if you take it from like a book sci fi perspective, it makes quite a bit of sense to be able to, to become an interplanetary species, because if there is some sort of catastrophic event, you look at what happened with the 16 times the size of earth with the sun and the solar flares that are happening right now, as we speak. Allegedly, right? If that got much worse, something could happen to, to the earth. And, and if that was the case, then it would be much better off. If we at least had an Adam and an Eve somewhere on Mars, that would be able to help us out. But also if you look at it from like an elitist perspective, you see that. Mark Zuckerberg just built a 40, almost 40 billion bunker, like unbelievable amount of money that all of these, these, these elitists are creating far below the surface of the earth. And it seems to me to be a little bit more of a escapist type of ideology that allows people who are far more financially set to offset the risk that they're going to be at the, the, the butt end of the joke. That is the end of humanity. Yeah, I would agree with you. I don't know if you've seen the show, the hundred it came out years ago. And I, I was like a teenager when it came out. And so I loved it because it was like, it was created as like a teen show. But basically they send down, so there's nuclear war on earth and everything is destroyed and it's radiation soaked. And the only people that survive are the people that fit in the bunkers. And there's only like a few bunkers throughout the whole world. And so the rest of the people went up to space. And so they've been living in space for however many years. And so they send these hundred. teenage kids down to see if the radiation's gone so they can live on the land again. But yeah, it's the same idea, like what you're talking about with the wealthy who go and hide in their bunkers, everyone else dies, and then some of them go to space, and then, oh, we're gonna colonize the earth again, how cute. And yeah, I think that's, that's it. If you, if you pay enough, you can survive the nuclear, the nuclear war, and Yeah, but I see these people as godless and, in their mind that's where things are going, in my mind that's not where things are going, and I personally don't fear death at all, so I'd rather die in a nuclear war than live in a bunker, honestly. But yeah, I think these people are perpetually afraid, and so they build their bunkers and I think Elon Musk is selling this dream of we're going to go to Mars and democracy and the he talks about how Mars would be ruled, you know, in a democratic way and it's for the people and all this. It's not for the people like he's going to bring his elitist friends. Like it's so silly when you look at like how much time does Elon Musk have left and you look at the trajectory of longevity. You look at, you know, the, the lifespan and, and age of people that we could potentially live to, let's say, I don't know, I'm, I'm 30. So based on the trajectory of life, maybe I should be able to live to a hundred. And let's say, and maybe if AI works out well enough and Elon Musk does a great enough job and so does Sam Altman, maybe it's 150, but, but Elon Musk probably has a runway. I don't know how old he is. He's probably mid forties, early forties, mid forties. 50s? Doesn't look too bad for 50. So let's say he has, if, you know, maybe they're gonna, put his brain in some sort of freezer or something, but let's say he has 60 years, 70 years left to live. He can do so much in that time, in a time where technology is expanding so rapidly with AI. And for most people who don't know this, Elon Musk was a initial investor of OpenAI. He was one of the very first people alongside Sam Altman. Sam Altman being the Y Combinator, Silicon Valley VC, Venture Capitalist founder of OpenAI, but he, him and Elon Musk started OpenAI together. And so they, Elon Musk, QAM, right? And again, you have to look at the theatrics, like how many of the, how much of this is actually real and how much of this is. Jersey Shore reality TV theatrics to convince you that you should implant the brain chip that the good guy gives you and and don't use that bad chat bot online that the bad guy gives you right there's there's so many implications of this so so when you look at the amount of time effort and energy that that in an outcome potential that Elon Musk has there's it's a very real possibility. And maybe not if you look at the Van Allen radiation belt, but the potential that he has to take the technology and the rapid prototype testing that he's doing within SpaceX today and try to colonize a different area. But who's going to go there? Like, who's going to be the very first people that get there? And who's going to be the very first people that get there in the next 50 to 70 years? What's the, the, the second that if we've seen anything else from the, the humanitarian human perspective or, or even Homo sapien perspectives or whatever you want to call it, the, the, the nature of humanity is that we become tribalists. If, if he starts to colonize Mars and, and we're here on Earth as the, the lonely peasants, there's absolutely going to be some type of dispute, right? Some type of tribalism, some type of idea that we are better than them. And here's why. And here's what, what we need to, to, to take from them. And it gets to be this like weird sci fi terrifying dystopia. And, and I'm not sure that when you go back to the, the godly perspective, that was what was intended for us. To begin with, it wasn't that God gave us the, the, the garden of Eden and the, the land of Mars, it's like, no, God gave us the garden of Eden. Yeah, for sure. Yeah. I don't, I don't see that as like, I mean, maybe I'm foolish, but I don't see that as like a real thing. Like I don't see us going to Mars and like living on Mars at least anytime soon. I think it's another bunker for sure. A deep, deep bunker next to Mark Zuckerberg, who's to be fair, trying to be way cooler than he actually is more recently. Yes. And so we, we talked about it a little bit. Robert F. Kennedy jr. And so I want to hear your piece. What is your thoughts on Robert F. Kennedy Jr.? Do you think he's a legitimate candidate, legitimate candidate? Do you think that he's somebody who's going to pull votes from one party or the other? What are your thoughts there? Yeah, I don't really see him as a threat, at least not to Trump. If anything, he'll take some votes away from Biden, but I don't see him as a serious candidate in this election. Obviously I personally won't be voting for him and I don't agree with a lot of his stances on things. I think people on the right really jump on his COVID vaccines. But he is. He's always been a super, super, avid environmentalist, so he's 100 percent into this climate change hoax. The policies that he would push as a result of that, I do worry about. Obviously he's, he's not pro gun the way that we are. He supports abortion up until birth, I think he said recently. Yeah, I don't agree with a lot of his policy. He's still very pro vaccine. He said it himself. He's quote emphatically pro vaccine. All his kids are vaccinated. It's just the COVID vaccine that he has a problem with, which is fine. But I see him as very, very much a part of the Democrat party, even if he's running as an independent. And I think people on the right embracing him as a little, not premature, but I don't think people are really researching like they should. Sure. Yeah. And I think I almost fell into that trap a little bit. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to me was somebody who seemed like a, you know, I, I tend to be a little bit hesitant to identify myself as red or blue or Democrat or Republican. I like to keep an open idea about most ideas. I tend to be more, far more conservative than I am liberal, obviously, when it comes to social issues and financial issues but, but I tend to be more libertarian than anything where I think most often than not the government's absolutely fucking atrocious at basically everything that it does. And so we had it when I was in the military, so I was in the air force. I was an air traffic controller in the air force and we had a bowling alley on base. It was the only, yeah, super random, this, it was the only piece. It was the only entertainment on baseball. There wasn't a movie theater. There wasn't literally anything at all. They had thousands and thousands of individuals that were on base that only had one piece of entertainment. And you know what happened to that bowling alley? It got shut down because it wasn't profitable. Wow. The United States government cannot successfully run a bowling alley. The only form of entertainment. The literal monopoly. On fun, on an entire military base, they could not run a bowling alley successfully. And guess what? Their beer was cheap. Everything was like, it was not expensive at all. They were just absolutely atrocious at business operations. And it opened my eyes up to the idea that the government is just terrible at everything it does. And so that brought me in many other reasons. But that's one particular thing that I can point to historically. Really that like made me think that like, man, the government's just really bad at stuff. There's not one thing that I can point to that the government does well. So when I looked at Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in some of the things and some of the ideologies, mostly his positions on COVID and in vaccines and in some of the things that he talked about there, it was intriguing. And I think where he lost basically everybody who was right of center was with his VP pick. Yeah, she is the white ex wife of a Google executive, like the guy who started Google. Yeah, probably the worst pick he could have made at all. I guess Tulsi Gabbard said no to him, which maybe makes it make a little bit more sense, but absolutely atrocious every single comment section. I look at of RFK. He is just getting roasted about his VP pick. And so I completely agree with you though. I, he recently, I think as of today. Came out and started to say that, Oh, I don't agree with abortion up until full term, which is like the most terrible, atrocious thing you could ever say in general is like, I don't think you should be able to kill babies when they're the largest they could be until full term. Like it just, and then you look at his gun policies. I don't think his gun policies were as, as, I guess as ridiculous as his. His abortion policies, his, his gun policies were essentially that I think the, the, the one quote that everybody points to for him is that if Congress or if Senate was essentially to put a bill across my desk, I would sign it if it had to do with an assault rifle ban. Yeah, that was like the quote and it's like. Yeah, don't do that. Yeah. But also I don't see that happening . You know, I'm a staun staunch second Amendment advocate. I have a, a, you know, a very beautiful Bravo company rifle upstairs, and two other, you know, I've, I have lots of, lots of weapons. I'm a military guy. I, you know, I go shoot, I, I train all of that stuff. So not, you're not gonna win my vote by saying those things. But I, I also think there was something to the, that he had something, he had something behind him that made people believe that he was a reasonable uncle. Yeah. I think that's like the best way to describe him is he was like, you know, you, you have your, your, your, Dad and your great grandpa, I don't know what to describe Biden as, like, your, your, your dad and your great grandpa arguing and both of them are like a little over the top and ridiculous. And then you have your uncle coming in and he's like, Hey, Hey, Hey, Hey, Hey, you're ridiculous here. Here's why you're wrong here. And he seemed very reasonable in a lot of situations. And then. You saw some of the things that came out, things like his gun policies, things like his abortion policies, things like, especially his VP pick. I think that, that to me as somebody who was probably, you know, I voted for Trump, I will vote for Trump, but. There was a very specific time period where I was very much so considering, and I think that's probably the same for a lot of people, a big percentage of the United States of America that was considering a vote for RFK that were like, maybe he's the guy who can be the reasonable uncle that can, that can come into office and have a reasonable opinion. And he's, he's very intelligent and he wrote the book about literally. Actually wrote the book about how terrible Fauci was. That's factual. I think that's why a lot of people like him. But for me, like all this stuff that's coming out now that's causing people not to like him, it's not a surprise to me at all because he's always been consistent in what he believes. So his VP pick, his stance on abortion, like none of that is a surprise to me. Cause if you actually researched, you know, his history, that's who he is. He was a huge little Clinton supporter voted for her over and over and over again. You know, like I expect, I expect him to have democratic policies and have more of a liberal perspective on things. For sure. And so, you know, wrap that up with a bow. I'm absolutely not voting for RFK, but I do think, I do, I do think actually that the best thing that could have ever happened, ever happened for Trump is that RFK grabs a extremely liberal VP that all of the conservatives are against, that all of the, all of the liberals love and you poll just the Just 10%. Just 10 percent of the votes from the liberals from from the left. And I think that you're, he's going to pull maybe less than 2 percent of the conservative vote at this point. I think he lost a huge, very large portion of the right as a result of his VP pick. I know again. And for me, I didn't hear about the abortion opinion because that would have been it as well. Biggest thing lingering me was like the, the gun positioning and, and the, the, the actual quotes that I had heard on that were very, you know, unconvincing in the way that it was like completely going to create my vote to be one side or the other. But I absolutely believe that. The best thing that could have happened to Trump, absolutely, was RFK choosing the VP candidate that he had chosen. If he had chosen Tulsi, I think that there would have been a real concern. I don't think that would have obviously won in any way, shape or form. I don't think he's going to win still, but I don't think that he, he would have won. Enough of the conservative vote to, to become, you know, even nominal. But I do believe now he has done, he did the thing that's going to make him a considerable potential vote for the liberal party. Yeah, I would agree with that. I think there's probably far more liberals and, and Democrats who are like, I Maybe I should question my opinion. Then there are probably conservatives after we've been right and right and right and right over the last four years. But if you had to point to something, anything at all from the, that is maybe a little bit not towing the line of the conservative party, is there anything at all that you can think of that maybe it's like. Hey, I don't fully subscribe to this, to this idea or this ideology that maybe is more mainstream conservative than that. Sure. I mean, I, I don't kiss the ground that Israel walks on. Obviously I'm not I will never support Hamas and I don't. I don't necessarily agree with everything the left has to say about Palestine, but I do think that Israel is way out of line. And I, I see Israel as the creation of the Rothschilds. I don't see biblical Israel as being a geographical location or a government, you know, I think I'm in agreement with the New Testament when it says that Israel is, you know, part of the church is part of Israel. Now we're a people group grafted in. And so it's not like a nation state. It's not Benjamin Netanyahu or, a specific piece of land. So, yeah, I'm definitely not, I'll probably never work in the conservative world because of that. But yeah. For sure. And I think beautifully stated. And I think that's, something that a lot of people that you say that the conservative world, right? Like the, the mainstream conservative, God, how many people have we seen be sent over to Israel? Yeah. Recently. Like how many mainstream, how many mainstream, like you talk about, you know, again, the Daily Wire, the PragerU's, all of those guys are literally getting funded and given videographers to send them over there. Yeah. And so, I appreciate that statement because to me that like, I'm, I'm, I'm, You know, I'm very, very much so in the same boat. I, I just, I don't see the, the argument that one side is the good guy and one side is the bad guy. And that is absolutely, absolutely the narrative that we're being told, you know, and even funded. You start to see some of the themes of the larger mainstream influencers and even the, the campaigns that are being ran there, that's like, I, I'm, I'm sorry, guys, like, I'm not going to sell my soul based on wartime policies of somebody who's, and it came out today. Today that the, I think it was, it was NATO or UN came out and said that, Oh, we were wrong by 50%. That was like, that was there. Did you see that, that article? There was an article that came out and said it wasn't 16, 000 women and 20, 000 children. It was 8, 000 children or it was 8, 000 women and 10, 000 children. Yeah. Like they, we cut our numbers in half. Yeah, it wasn't, it wasn't that many innocent Children and women, it's like, okay, so you're telling me as a, as an American citizen that I'm supposed to enthusiastically fund the murder of 8, 000 women and 10, 000 Children. I, I just can't get behind it. I don't see why so many people, unless it's monetary and they must be getting. And if, if you're like me and you're like you, I'm not sure how much money you would have to flash in my face for me to sit here in front of you and lie to you and say, I'm okay. With 10, 000 children dying. I have, like I said, I'm a father. I have three children. You cannot put enough money in front of me that you can tell me that I'm going to push this idea that what one party is doing, that is absolutely atrocious. That is absolutely against the Geneva convention. That is absolutely against the ideology that we, we utilized when we were in Iraq and we were in Afghanistan, when we were fighting terrorists with a Surgical knife as opposed to what they're using in the I. D. F. Today. I can't get behind it. And I see so many people like so many people that I respected through Cove it that just showed you who are the warmongers, right? And we even saw it with the Ukraine. Like it was so encouraging to me. Being the, you know, maybe I'm just a dirty hippie from the seventies, but maybe, maybe I'm just a dirty hippie and, and I'm, and I'm just generally anti war. I don't see very many cases where you can argue to me that that war is a good thing. That there's not a different way of going about it. And so when you look at what's happening in Israel and Palestine, and there's an argument to be made, exactly what you said. I don't agree with October 7th. I do believe the IDF had plenty of awareness of it as of the American intelligence reports that were given to them almost two weeks prior to these terrorists coming over with 20 foot fans behind them. And that they eventually were able to shoot down 300 plus drones that are the size of, you know, a foot by a foot, right? You can't convince me that the IDF wasn't aware of the 30, 40, 50, however many terrorists on fans. They're flying over the border, but then try and tell me that you were able to shoot down at 99 percent efficiency, the drones. That were flying over the border from Iran and the however many hundreds of of missiles that were being shot over the border by Iran and then they just called a wash like, you know, well, don't don't ask questions. How are you? How are you able to shoot down 300 plus drones, but you missed every 100 percent accuracy. You missed all of the dudes on fans. Yeah, flying over your border and took six hours to respond to it and it's the same way that you look at. I don't know how much research you've done into the actual evidence of Pearl Harbor and some of the information that we've had on that when you go back to that timeframe, but it's very, very reminiscence of what happened there and so. Yeah. And, and, and when you look at the amount of information they had, you look at the, the, it's, there's a argument to be made that they were pretty well aware of what was going to happen. And they were very well capable of, of making wartime decisions to shoot every single one of those terrorists down, flying over the border, that they were right sitting there. Potentially waiting for him watching leading up to it. And so, yeah, absolutely. I think that's a great response. And that to me has been one of the major things that to me has woken there. There was there actually probably wasn't. a single thing that I could point to from the conservative party that really made me question whether or not I was like on the team. Yeah. Yeah, for sure. And maybe if you go back, there's probably, I'm sure several other instances of it, but the one thing to me that stood out was Here's a better question for you. Why do you think that is? Why do you think there's a, a, a institution behind the conservative party that is pushing? I can't tell you how conflicted I am watching these, these protests on college campuses, like I look at these protests and I'm, I'm somebody who's not like completely, I'm not pro, I would say I'm pro Palestine, anti Hamas, anti Israel. That's, that's where I would position myself. And so when you look at that, that, that situation that's happening, and then you look at the people that are demonstrating at colleges, it's like, okay, I get the bleeding heart of the left, right? I think there's a very famous quote that says show me a. Show me a young liberal and I'll show you somebody without a brain. Show me an, or I'm sorry. I'm sorry. This is how it's stated. It's show me a young conservative and I'll show you somebody without a heart. Show me an old liberal and I'll show you somebody without a brain. Yeah. That's, that's a very, like, very famous quote, and, and the idea is that, like, I, I totally get where some of these people are coming from, where they're like, oh yeah, I'm gonna show up to this, it's a genocide, it's this and that, and I, I think genocide's being misused. What, what is the, the one thing that you would say to conservatives? And what is the one thing that you would say to liberals about what's going on in Israel and Palestine? I would say to both sides, question everything. Like, why are you so eager to trust either the Palestinians or Israel? Like, why are we so quick to jump on bandwagons? Like question everything. And I think we would find that we agree on like. 90 percent of issues if people would just start asking questions. 100%. And I think that's like the same across the board, right? Don't don't wholesale wear the jersey. Never wear the jersey ever. Yeah. The second you do, the second you put on the jersey, it's, it's 10 times harder to take the jersey off than it is to put it on. And so, so question everything, even when it, when it comes to COVID. When it comes to Israel, when it comes to Palestine. And I think we saw that through, through the differentiation of the influencers who wholesale bought the Israel narrative, then questioned both side of things. And I, and I think that to me is encouraging as we move forward, as we move into, you know, what some people believe is like potentially more terrible. Terrible situations that could come up, right? A lot of people predict those, you know, as we move towards the election, as we move towards these more contentious issues that are, that are coming up, a lot of people are saying, you know, it's just going to get worse. There's going to be this, it's going to be a breakout of this. The United States is going to get involved in this. Question everything, right? Because I don't believe in any institution anymore. I don't believe in the CIA. I don't believe in the FBI. I don't believe in the United States government as I used to. I was a very, very patriotic individual. That's why I joined the military was literally to serve my country. You should question the narratives that are coming out from every major institution because every major institution is driven by patriots. Money. Yes, right? And and you hear that like narrative of it's the root of all evil and I don't think that has to be the case. But I do, do believe in most times it is the case because money equals power and, and power corrupts all and so question, everything questioned the, the narratives that you're being spoofed. I think everybody's pretty much aware about the mainstream media at this point, but I don't think everybody's aware of the influencers, right? Everybody started to buy in wholesale to the influencers that they, they started to buy into who are specifically. Just pro or anti vax, right? You saw that with RFK, right? Everybody's like, oh, he's anti vaccine. He's this. He's that. He must be telling the truth about this. It's like, Well, maybe he was right on this thing, but you should still continually question an individual on every subject that comes up, right? Because whether they're, they're anti vax, but they're pro Israel, every, every state at every, every position should be questioned. And I think that's the only way to get through this. This information age, right? That the difference between the industrial revolution and the technological revolution is that everything moves so fast. The life cycles of news, all of it is, is so quick and it's so easy to buy into one thing and get drawn into the narrative. Like, Again, I think RFK is just such a perfect example that I myself fell into. And so I think that's a great way to put it. So again, thank you so much for being here. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart. I hope you have a good day. Where can everybody find you? You can find me on Instagram at Brianna X Robinson, X at Bri, B R I, Robinson. And then TikTok, I got taken down. So my new TikTok is now at Brianna, California. I just made it like brand new. So hopefully it'll be around for a bit. Awesome. Well, I love your content. I love talking to you. Thank you so much. I would love to have you back on again, and I hope you have a great day. Thank you so much for having me. Awesome. Thank you so much.
-
Protect yourself from the perils of modern technology with high-quality faraday products designed and developed by yours truly by going to RONINBASICS.com today.
In this week's episode of the Adams Archive, I have a discussion with Eric Moutsos. Eric is the host of the American Moutsos Show, the founder and CEO of the health and wellness company Freedomblends, and a former police officer who has been at the center of political activism in several different high-profile situations.
Eric is the author of the book Dispatched, recounting his fight against leadership during his time as a police officer, and the lead in a recent documentary called “Non-Essential” which follows him through his journey of fighting back against the government during Covid lockdowns.
We discuss the controversies he has found himself at the center of, the Israel-Palestine war, selling out conservatives, good vs. evil, and more.
You can find Erics social media profiles, podcast, book and more by clicking here
All the links: linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
----more----
Full transcription
Adams archive. Hello, you beautiful people. And welcome to the Adams archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today on today's episode. I am going to be talking with Eric Mutzos. Now, Eric is a political commentator and podcast host of the Eric Mutzos show. He is also a CEO of the Freedom Blends supplement company.
And Eric has been at the center of several. controversial events, one of those being almost 10 years ago, when Eric was a police officer for almost seven years, he actually had to fight back against the police department that he worked for, who was forcing him mandating him to basically be a part of a gay pride parade.
Pretty wild stuff. Fast forward a few years later, during COVID times, Eric was also at the center of some controversy, as he basically organized and gathered several rallies to help small business owners during the time of COVID lockdowns, as well as through an entire concert during the same time, where he had to get shut down by the state, fought back against that, and eventually lost his job.
One out. So Eric is an author. He was also a part of the recent documentary, which outlined that organization of those situations during COVID lockdowns. So without further ado, we have a great discussion today about good versus evil current events, the Israel and Palestinian conflict, the college campus protests that are going on, we get into some conspiracy theories, of course.
So. Let's go ahead and jump into it. But first, I do want to tell you about one thing, what I want to tell you about is Ronin and Ronin is my very new Faraday goods company, which is releasing our very first products over the coming weeks. Now you might ask yourself, what is a Faraday product? And I'm glad that you asked. Faraday products are basically products that are lined with a special fabric that blocks all inbound and outbound EMF frequencies.
And if you don't know what EMFs are, it's basically emitted by every single piece of modern technology. The phone that's in your hand, the laptop that's next to you, your TV, your microwave, your fridge, the 5G towers that are outside of your window. Every single one of those things is constantly emitting a frequency which affects health in negative ways.
Now there's been several recent high profile discussions. People like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have spoken about the effects of wifi radiation poisoning. You've had Joe Rogan have several people on his podcast discussing these negative side effects as well. Uh, there's, there's a lot of reasons that Faraday goods are great for you.
One of those being protecting yourself from the harmful health effects of EMFs. But also protecting your privacy. You can actually use that same lined material in things like backpacks, cell phone bags, laptop sleeves, all of those things to basically eliminate your digital footprint, stop the corporations from being able to track you, stop the government from seeing every move that you make and every store that you make a purchase from.
All of those different things, just by simply dropping your technology Ronin, you can eliminate all of the tracking that is going on in your modern world. Life, all of the privacy invasions, everything that's happening from the corporations to the government, they are constantly monitoring you. And the only way, the only way to stop that is by utilizing a Faraday bag and airplane mode, doesn't do it.
Turning your phone off. Doesn't do it. They constantly have access with softwares like Pegasus. So help yourself help your family eliminate those harmful effects of EMFs by going to Ronan basics. com. checking out our newest products, signing up for some of the newer drops that are coming out just this coming week.
Alright, so thank you so much for listening. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart, leave a five star review, hit the subscribe button. And let's jump into it.
The Adams archive.
My dream is to one day have a little homestead I've got 20 chickens now, but my dream is to have a homestead. living off the land the way that God wanted us to.
Amen. That's awesome, man. Yeah that's something I think a lot of people it's so interesting how many people got chickens after like post COVID. I think there's something primal that when everything goes to hell a little bit I don't know what it was, but it seems like I fell into that too.
We have a chicken coop out back. We had nine chickens that, that we had we even had ducks for a little bit, but it was funny because it's so many people that you saw. Just chickens were like the first step that people took in their journey to like becoming a little bit, well, I almost think that's more of a realization about the government, not actually being the father figure that was going to.
take care of you that everybody thought it was.
And it chickens for some reason was like the gateway drug into homesteading for everybody. Even if you live in a small city. I live in a, I live in a city area and it was pretty easy to get to the proof through the city and everything. They just got to come out and check out the coop and things.
But yeah, it was really, it's funny how many people I think ended up getting chickens as a result of COVID, which is such a weird correlation but Yeah. It's funny. So, and when you talk about homesteading I think that was something that went. That came out of COVID too, was the amount of people that realized that our governmental structure and the protective layer that we thought our government gave us between us and the food supply chains, water all of those things essentially crumbled that when we looked at what happened through the grocery stores, right, I remember going to the grocery stores and all of the meat being gone.
All of the eggs being gone, all of the milk being gone, and people started to wake up to that idea this isn't a a movie, right? It's not every, it's not a things can go south pretty quick, and I think we saw that with, COVID,
Yeah. Well, and it's going to, but people don't understand. That was just the first wave, of what I believe is coming, but it's you have to understand that this is all, it's all biblical. Everything that's happening right now, it's all this. God, knows the beginning to the end and he's already seen the whole thing out.
And now, We you and I and listeners, viewers, we're now here as the test to see where we stand. Like I'm convinced this whole sucker goes down probably within the next 10 years. I don't mean to scare anybody, but it's evident that I believe God is preparing his people with like ideas of, chickens and things like that.
He's getting his people ready to leave Babylon entirely because as soon as they bring in this beast system, which I believe they will, as soon as the, dollar dies. That the, dollar dying is going to be very, intentional. It's, not going to be, Oh, all of a sudden they know exactly what they're doing.
Just like COVID, COVID, was the left and then the overhand right was the Vax.
And so then, so now with the financial system that's going to go and it's not going to be, in my opinion, it's not going to be a recession or a depression. I believe it's going to be a collapse and that's why we got to be ready for what's coming because you're either going to have to, where are you at on, do you, when I talk about this Christian stuff or you, do you believe in God, Austin?
Absolutely. Yeah,
Okay. Sorry. I just don't know. Sometimes when I'm talking to people I don't know. But I believe that the devil duplicates everything that God does, everything beautiful he does. He's got to have a counterfeit to it, right? And so this new world order is just the counterfeit of what God has always been trying to get his people to do, which has become one heart and one mind.
Because if everybody did that, it would be, everybody would share with everybody. There would be no poor among us. Everybody would, you'd grow what you need and you give the rest away. And that's the environment that, consider the lilies, right? Jesus taught it. Consider the lilies, the birds of the birds of the sky.
You don't think I can feed you. That's the whole point. That's what, well, the city of Enoch was taken up, but I'm, trying to get prepared for that. And even if that doesn't happen, which I hope I'm crazy, I hope that in 10 years,
you know what I mean?
to be fair.
Yeah I really do like just get, okay, that's great.
I'll put me in the ward house but, I don't think I am crazy. I don't think that I believe that what's crazy are all of these people that have their heads in the sand that don't even realize what's happening. Our state of Utah, let me just read this to you. The state of Utah, we just won the best state, right? We just won the very best state of Utah. And we're, talking about of what? The best state of what?
Right.
We're about my our state is about to flip over to blue. We're
purple right now because we have a governor of the state of Utah that uses pronouns to little kids on zoom calls, bro.
It's actually, it's. That's fairly surprising, too, especially Utah. Obviously a very big religious sects within Utah itself. And I guess that's an interesting thought, too. When you talk about the dollar collapsing, right, you can speak about that from, like you did a biblical perspective.
sense, but you can also look at.
that from what's happening, socioeconomically across the world, right? Geopolitically right now between the brick, right? If you look at the way that India and Iran and China and Russia are all teaming up right now, have all already moved away from the dollar. And when we look at India and you look at China, those are the two biggest world powers when it comes to industry today, right? It's not like United, the United States of America is manufacturing things in an extremely high level. When we're outsourcing our talent, our menu, when we're outsourcing. I, have a business background. I run a business and several. And so when we're outsourcing talent to do most of the jobs, we're outsourcing it to India and when we're outsourcing manufacturing, we're outsourcing it to China.
And so when you have those, organizations, those countries that are now moving away from utilizing the USD, the dollar. In their everyday trades and I ran when it comes to oil, right? We're, messing with some very dangerous territory politically in getting into this potential escalation with Iran, with which and Putin's already talked about his response.
What it would be if, situations escalated with Iran, we're already seeing tensions rise with Taiwan and for China, right? We are literally being put in a position where. If nothing else, our leadership is putting us in a place where our economic system could very well collapse just from the decisions being made by our leaders.
Yeah, that's right. Well, and it is going to happen. And so You know, the more money we give to Ukraine, it's going to start happening to the deep state part of Israel. I have to be careful saying this because people think if you're, you question what's happening with Israel or some kind of like anti semi, it's no, the deep state has infiltrated every single government across the world.
And so if you don't think that, so look at Israel, I look at Israel a lot like America, the majority of people in America are good people, right? But guess what? Those of us are questioning our government that's happening in Israel too, just FYI. And so just big, make sure before you start throwing your flags all over your bios, that this whole thing is a big, operation.
And it's, Even me saying this right now, I can't even believe I'm saying this from where I used to be even like four years ago, when you start to wake up to this stuff, it's so, unbelievably overwhelming, but at the same time, when you see the big picture of it, this is all supposed to go down just like this.
Yeah, And I think that's there's been like a, almost a lot of weaponization of spirituality when it comes to the Israel Palestinian conflict, right? I think it's been really interesting to see the way that the right, like conservative right, has all almost simultaneously, in lockstep, decided that they're without question, right?
And there's definitely things to question there, right? I've been somebody who's been looking at the situation and I, don't, like to wholeheartedly buy blue or red, right? I generally consider myself to be a more of a libertarian. I would say in a sense where I think less lesser government in most situations is generally a positive thing.
And so I don't really feel like I have skin in the game. Right. So, so when I look at the Palestinian and Israeli conflict, you see the big money and conserve like the conservative industry pushing and backing all of the influencers, all of the you see the daily wire, PragerU. You see these large organizations sending the biggest influencers over to Israel with a, almost a documentarian style videographer behind them.
They pay for them to go over there. They pay for them to speak about these things. And they almost have blinders on and I'm not ignorant to either side. I look at what's going on in Palestine, and I look at what's going on in Israel, and what happened on October 7th is, it's a tragedy. It's horrible.
It shouldn't happen, right? Terrorism in any sense is absolutely atrocious.
but don't you think that it's possible that October 7th was a deep state operation within itself?
Absolutely. So when you look at
The amount of information that the, IDF had, Leading up to that It's, staggering. It's almost very, like almost gives you the idea of Pearl Harbor back in the day, right? You see the, amount of signals that they had. And then you, look at the IDF and see how much more technologically advanced they are than even some of the intelligence agencies that we have here in the United States, right?
And then you think that 40 guys on big fan. and parachutes
So, it's so obvious. It's so obvious, man. It's and now you got what? 30, 40, 000 people that have died in Gaza. And it's and people think, yeah, well they're human shields. It's they just dismiss it. It's no, There's innocent people dying.
Absolutely.
innocent people dying over here.
There's innocent people dying over here. Like we should be standing on the side of innocent people wherever that is.
And To me, it's I don't look at anybody differently, dude. I don't, I look at somebody as a child of God. Yeah. They might not believe in Jesus yet, but I look at them like God loves all his kids and he's just trying.
And now we're killing each other like this and cheering it on and saying, we got to flatten it. And look, I've come a long way. Like I remember even when Trump dropped the big old what's that big old MAGA bomb that he dropped at one point. I can't remember what it was called.
Sure. There was, I'm sure there was a few of those
I know it just come. And I remember like making jokes about it. And it was like, and they did hit that. They didn't go, Trump didn't go in and do what Israel's doing to Gaza. But I, the point that I'm trying to make is that I've come a long way in this a short amount of time on how wicked it is.
War. War. In any degree yes, God wants us to defend he wants us to defend that as a godly principle to defend yourself, man, but when we, it's so obvious what they're doing they want us in third world war. They need us in third world war. They're funding both sides of this, of these little college Riots that they're starting to have their fun in that side.
And so then it pushes all these people. Now it's this war, but it's so obvious. Don't participate in it. Don't participate in it. Call for peace. It's but that's what they need.
And you see it, the conservative side of things when it came to what was going on between Russia, like you almost saw a complete 180 between the Republican party and the conservatives that were out there that always generally were a little bit more. Historically pro-war than the liberals or the Democrat side of things, right?
You look, you go back to almost anything pre 2018 and. The left was staunch in almost every situation across the board, anti war in almost every sense, right? There were the, they were the cool liberal hippies in the seventies. They were against Vietnam. They were there was a complete 180 at one point, very recently where you saw a glimmer of light for their conservatives and Republican party, where they looked at what was happening in Ukraine and they said, no, we don't want any part of this.
There's no reason that, this war should be happening. And there's absolutely no reason that our attacks. Hours should be going to fund it. Right? And, so
When, you look at that now, I was optimistic about the conservative party for such a long time because they were the ones calling out against war, against the war machine.
And now you look and, they're the ones that are flying the, Israeli flags saying that they, can do no wrong no matter how many innocent children, women. Families, they bomb there. There's nothing that it's, all in the name of, and I think you, you pointed to something there specifically that I've noticed as a theme, anytime that they're trying to create a narrative, especially when it comes to these terrorists in the middle East, they always use human shields.
I I was in I don't know, fourth grade, fifth grade when 9 11 happened, but I can't tell you that if I had to think of one thing in my mind that made them terrorists that the mainstream media painted the narrative with, it was that idea. It was the human shields that completely, they dehumanize women and children by utilizing them as human shields.
Right. And you saw all of this propaganda going out, right? Just like you saw with Ukraine, the ghost of Kiev that ended up being a video game. Right. You saw the, women and the men being sent out in buses. I've done some videos on this and, you saw all of this propaganda being pushed out and the human shields is at the very top of the list for these people when they try to paint a narrative around terrorism.
well, and that's the only thing they can say too, to justify it as human shields. And it's just no, there's certain wars. When I was a police officer, if there was like a hostage situation, right. You don't kill both of
them. That's not what you do. That goes against every, it's what's the point of the government being there?
It's like we're trying to help. And, so that, that excuse doesn't fly with me and all, I want to say on this topic is just be very, prayerful about it. The devil wants the devil wants us. He wants bloodshed. That's where we're to the point. We've, already like swiftly went through this and the next phase of the sexual revolution and the devil's like really salivating for, blood at this point.
And so my, answer is, to, not do that. My, my answer is to call it out for what it is. Call out the wickedness for what it is. Don't call for war. Don't justify war because if we have that in our hearts and if we really are going to accept that as a collective whole, that's okay. That what's happening say in, in right now in Gaza, if that's okay, we're not, going to be part of, the kingdom of God if our hearts are thinking that's okay.
Does that make sense?
Yeah. Absolutely. And that's the thing that I you said you, you use the word like the, noun of the devil. Right. And you talk about the same people who are pushing for war, right? Who are profiting from these things, right? That the people who both funded Hamas to become what they are today, who funded Al Qaeda, who then turned on us who funded.
Almost every side of the war, and you see it as a microcosm with what's happening in the universities, which you alluded to as Well, right? Every single one of the tents that were being set out at these extremely expensive universities were all this the same tent because they were sent them by the organizations, the same organizations like APAC, who are funding all of this.
All but seven of the politicians that are currently making decisions on whether or not to send money to Israel, And so you look at you, you look at all of the narratives that have come out more recently. And I, only mentioned this because you, mentioned the devil, right? You mentioned the,
Well, I look at, we talk about God, right? Like we talk about God all the time, but we don't talk about what the adversary is doing in his plans. And he hates when we call out his plans. He hates it. So bad. And that's why he hates people that speak truth. Because he, likes to just, he needs to justify himself too, right?
He fell from heaven, it's he has to be justified and so, he believes he's right. And so that's what I'm trying to say is that we, have to call these things out when we see it. And I'm not saying you have to use devil. You could just say, Hey, it's wrong what they're doing. Right. I just, say those things because I believe this is a huge spiritual war that we're in and we have to start identifying it as such.
If we're going to like, Be able to, ascend higher. Maybe that's the right word. If we're going to be, if we're going to be able to defend what's coming in the next little while we, the only words that we can use as Jesus Christ, like those are the only words that we're going to, that will have the power to, to not only stop what's coming, but to, transform things.
What's happened, what's going to happen where we have to start using those types of words, in my opinion.
Have you seen, And, speaking of that, have you seen Tucker Carlson speak on the spiritual aspect of what's going on more recently? Have you seen some
Yeah. Yeah, he's right. And, I'd add to it. He's absolutely right. And now I don't know much about like the aliens and stuff. I really haven't got into it that much. Is it possible? Sure. Anything's possible, but the, point that I think with Tucker, what he's trying to make is that this is very, we just see in the physical because we're being tested right now.
God, is literally just watching us and he's just testing us. Yeah. He's what are you, made of? You got to understand that the kingdom of God is where he lives. If you, look in let's see first Corinthians 1540, it talks about degrees, right? The degree that God lives in that celestial kingdom degree.
That is where kings and queens live. And, so why I bring this up is because we're, in this test to see where it is that we are going to place ourselves based off of the decisions that we make here. The whole purpose of this earth life I'm don't you love that this is what we were going to talk about, Mike, when we were prepping for this podcast?
Like not one thing, right? So good.
it's all good.
This
is the kind of stuff
That I I think most people are thinking it. I think most people think about this kind of stuff, but to try and articulate it and then to try and because yeah, could I be wrong on this stuff? I could be, but, it's so evident that this is such a, spiritual test to me.
When, you talk about it being spiritual, right? In the most basic sense, you're talking about good versus evil, black versus
white. right. Huh.
versus light, right? And so when you look at, when you look at the things that have been happening over the last four to five years, we've seen truth as a fundamental weapon for the side of the good. And we've seen how often the side of the bad, right? You want to say black and white the, side of evil, whatever you want to call it, Satan, the devil, whatever
they try to stifle the truth. Right? The truth is evident. The sun will always show the next day and it will eliminate the darkness. And so even if you just take it from the most simple sense when you look at something that says, who is trying to stifle the truth and who is trying to It's very evident who is on the side of the good and who is on the side of the evil, right?
And so even if you just say there's good and there's bad and there's people who are perpetuating good values and there's people who are perpetuating evil for the purpose of self inflation of ego for the purpose of integrity. Monetization for the purpose of the very same people who I'm talking about who are being flown to Israel to have a videographer behind them, to, to, never for a second to speak about the atrocities that are happening in Gaza today.
Right? So if you wanna vet your influencers, you wanna vet the people that you're following, you wanna. Do you ever disagree with them? Right. Because if I, if there's somebody out there that I never,
Yeah. Oh, I do
all the time. And, I try, are you asking me like rhetorically? Are you just,
you're, do you want to know?
that was rhetorical, but you can go ahead and answer it.
Oh I'm just saying I, I do all the time. Hey, be really careful with this. This could be very well a deep state operation. Hey, be careful with this. There's a lot more to this story stuff like that because here's the truth. We're, None of us are fully awake to this awful situation that we're in and we're gonna get in a place where we might Be in a position where we're wrong about something and then you got to quickly check yourself spiritually hey Why do I feel off about this?
Why is there something off about it? Oh because you're being deceived. That's why And so I try to do it to good people that I follow and there's some big ones and they're they are hook line and sinker on support in Israel under any circumstance. And it's you guys, this is in Israel.
This is wickedness to me.
And, it's clear, it's God is gathering his people right now and ultimately there's going to be like really a group I don't know how far you want me to hear about these like I guess Conspiracies you want me to hear
We go deep on this podcast, so feel free.
when this system goes down there you're gonna have to bow down to one of two gods Now we're all up into Israel and I, every single time, it's just bowing down. And so, and I'm not saying that A lot of these things could be true, right? There's, a lot of things that, that, that could be true. However when we, go along with it, whatever narrative, whatever that, whatever the government's feeding us, if we just go along with that as if it's true, we're in a lot, we're in a world of hurt.
Absolutely. And I think if you look at the government, right, you look at all the things that have come out more recently about the, not when you say the government, it sounds it's, the government is what, 500, it's like millions of people, right? But when you look at the government,
the federal government is the, just the federal government is millions.
right, exactly. So, so when you talk about the government you're talking about the governmental officials who we duly elected, right? Put that in quotation marks, but duly elected officials who have gone into these positions of power. There has been a unbelievable amount of information that has come out more recently.
Let's say the last three to five years showing that those people, right? And this is when, we talk about my spirituality or my beliefs in religion, one of the things that was a big, Part of my moving more towards religion and spirituality, having grown up Presbyterian at a young age and then moving a little bit away and coming back now is realizing that all of these people in positions of power, all of the people that are holding office right now, there's a very, large group of these people who have shown themselves to be Worshipping the darkness, right?
That have shown themselves to go in, in worshiping Malak at Bohemian Grove that have shown themselves to be within Hillary Clinton's emails, all of there's so many examples of this of, showing that the people in the highest positions of power have absolutely in one way, shape, or form. Gone to, you see it in music, you see it in the movies and the TV shows that are being pushed out.
You see it in politics. You see all of the, highest positions of culture and society.
Well, you see it even with Trump and you see it with politicians on our side as if Donald Trump's going to come and save us, right? Yeah.
Right. Yeah, You go back to QAnon, right? The, he has the
military. in my opinion, a deep state operation.
Well and it did it, if it was, and it, and I think that it very well was, if it was, it did exactly what it was supposed to do. It made people look silly. It de-legitimized the opposing opinion. Right. Now, if you were pro-Trump, right?
Even just the terms maga or far right, or Q anon they, associated every single person who was. Pro Trump to be a Q and I and conspiracy theorist. And then they took that to the furthest and said, Oh, they believe that Trump owns the military and that he can do no wrong. And really someday he's going to come back.
And there was all of these, there was the very furthest extent. of what QAnon believed. But then even if you just take it maybe 10, 20, 30, 40 percent back from the craziest sides of their belief systems, when you look at what was happening between Pizzagate and all of these more, somewhat considered to be extreme conspiracy theories, but there's foundations there's seeds of truth in a lot of it.
But then you get into the very, very craziest side of it. And those were used the, very farthest Extreme conspiracies, and I'm not saying that Pizzagate itself wasn't, didn't have legitimacy to some of the claims that were happening, but what I am saying is that when they said that he still has the military in his pocket and any day now he's going to come back and be the president, he's really the president of the United States.
It delegitimized all of the legitimacy within the movement that was happening of people who believed things that are very real, right? All of the people waking up to the very thing that I'm talking about this satanic worship by politicians and Hollywood and the music industry that were happening and what that entailed when you look historically for that, when you talk about.
Sacrifices and how far you want to get down that rabbit holes, but you see what I'm saying is that they utilized a very proven and true system to de legitimize the very legitimate concerns that people had surrounding what, whatever the movement was, that was QAnon to begin with that turned into what it was later on,
\ at this point, I think the most important thing that we can do is just get prepared physically and spiritually, really that's it. Well, what does that look like? I always try to tell people at least get a year's worth, at least a year's worth of food for your family, at minimum.
I don't know why that year is stands out to me. I think maybe you look at Noah, do you remember how long Noah was on the boat for? It was about 375 days that he was on the boat. It's, I think that there's something to that year, Mark. And And I believe that we have to have at least the provisions that much that we can, because people will die, right?
People will die of starvation. And so don't let it be you. Have water. Know that there's water in the ground. Go to the lowest part and start digging. You're going to hit water. That's a lie that they tell us. I'm telling you. And they hate that. It's like hydrogen and oxygen create water. And it's they've lied about how much water is never ending.
Just like oil. I don't care what anybody says. I'm just telling you the truth. So, get prepared physically and then get prepared spiritually, which is get right with God repent, we all need to repent every day. And we all do stupid things. That's why Christ came. And if we're prepared physically and if we're prepared spiritually, there's nothing to fear.
Don't be afraid because that's all you can do.
that's an interesting thing That I, think a lot of people, like I talked about that where the, creeping fear in, the, Realization of that through covid, where even the what I believe was 100%, one of the most successful psychological operations that happened in Covid was the toilet paper shortage.
That was amazing.
The, toilet
paper shortage showed people, it made people freak out, just an everyday essential . You didn't need it. Right. You can find, you can get a towel and wash it. There's so many different ways, get a bidet, right? There's so many different ways that you can deal with that issue. But the toilet paper shortage to me was a shock test.
So I I did a podcast, a full five hour breakdown on a document that it was actually leaked from the CIA. That's called silent weapons for quiet wars. Have you ever heard of that?
b no, I haven't.
So silent weapons for quiet wars was a document that was found in a fax machine in the 1980s in from a purchase of a IBM fax machine so they did a whole a wholesale sale of all of these materials that were happening at IBM and one of the things that was interesting within the machine itself was a document from the 1940s and 50s, I believe.
And it was a secret closed door document by the CIA. And what it essentially did was it outlined everything that we're talking about here today. It outlined the way that they wanted to manipulate the financial Society, they wanted to manipulate the way that, that people engaged with each other. But one of the things that they talked about, there's a theory or actually a framework called shock testing and shock testing originally came from the aviation industry in which they would, take the, wings of the airplane.
They would take all of that and they would put it through a series of tests and based on the information and data that they took back from that shock test, and it was literally like basically shaking the materials to see that it would withstand. And how it would react to certain amounts of pressure and stimuli and, all those things.
And so they took that fundamental ideology of what shock testing was in the aviation industry and they utilized it to start to weaponize big amounts of data against the general public. And there's some really the most interesting document. It, I would say I've read is called silent weapons for quiet wars.
And within that shock testing, the idea was we want to utilize certain types of tests against the public. Like how would the society react if we got rid of toilet paper and what they might find is that if we Have a toilet paper shortage, that people might start buying large amounts of water. and they might also start purchasing chickens.
That's a very real potential correlation, right? So they found these weird correlations and causations that happen due to these shock tests. And so I 100 percent believe these things are happening today. And the way that they're happening is much scarier than it was in the 1950s and 1940s that it was being weaponized against the general public because now they can use AI algorithms to do Hundreds of thousands of these tests at a time and see exactly how the
General public is going to react.
have you gotten into all the patents? I did an Instagram reel on like the United States patents on direct energy weapons. Oh man,
Oh, it's unbelievable. You can go to you. So I did it when it came to Hawaii, you can go to YouTube right now and you can go to Lockheed Martin's Insta or Lockheed Martin's YouTube channel and you can see them. Same, thing with, like all of these major military industrial complex companies, they have like literal star wars type advertisements right now on YouTube
Oh yeah.
about direct energy weapons and, boasting about how amazing they are and how efficient they are.
And then, they want to take the videos that you and I create on Instagram and they want to call it misinformation when literally Lockheed Martin has Dozens of videos right now on
Oh yeah,
man. It's so the weapons that they have, it's, and I, equate it to right now when we see all the things that are happening with the weather, I equate it to I don't know if you remember in the old Testament when, the Pharaoh, which is the government when, they were showing their magic to Moses, like their, tricks.
And I think that's what's happening right now. I think this is their tricks the, what they're spraying in our skies, what they're putting in, the air, there's going to be project blue beam. You're going to just be seeing a whole bunch of Really, fascinating. Look, remember all those lightning storms that were hitting all over the United States?
Do you remember that? Just lightning, everywhere. I was getting videos from
everywhere. When was that?
Oh, it was last year sometime.
Okay. Interesting.
a whole Instagram reel on it, but lightning probably every 30 seconds for two hours straight, but it was, you can tell it wasn't your normal lightning.
It was definitely a weather modification. And so I think what's happening is the devil,
Sure.
the government, whatever you want, darkness, however you want to label it. This is their way of showing that is his world. This is he's in control. And I again, I believe God's just sitting back, wait and watching what, his Children are going to do.
then when he starts to speak, it's, there won't be enough bunkers that Zuckerberg can build that's going to hide the truth. them from God. I'm telling you right now, like when he starts to speak and when he steps in, look out
And so you mentioned a couple of things there. The one being the weather modification, right? Talking about cloud seeding or, I can't even think of the original conspiracy term at this point. What is it for cloud seeding?
chemtrail.
Chemtrails. Thank you. Thank you. Again, same
It's been happening for decades.
How many times, I was fact checked by Instagram on it, maybe two years ago.
You look at what was happening in the, who's the, United Arab Emirates. Just recently they had a huge flood in Saudi Arabia,
Yep. that, that,
right. And they have been basically sitting on, every news channel being so excited to share how much cloud seeding they're doing.
Right. Yeah. It's so, yeah they, openly say it. It's so stupid that people can't even, they don't even believe I'm a pilot. I'm a pilot. And I know, yeah. Okay. Well, how many doctors are out there pushing the V?
That doesn't make that to me, just because you're in that profession means nothing to me.
I'm sure you're a great person. I'm sure you would never spray people intentionally to kill people. But just because you're a pilot doesn't make, doesn't mean that the government's not doing this. I'm sorry. I don't know how else, it's like cops, right? I was a cop. I didn't, I had no idea how wicked the upper three letter agencies are.
No idea.
I thought by getting into law enforcement, that was like the top echelon of integrity. Unfortunately, it goes the other way around. The higher you go up, the more corrupt it gets. And when you see that and you realize that's what we've become as, an Amer as, this, people that we, were supposed to be a city on a Hill, right?
When you see that, we have become really the bad guys in a lot of sense, like really, if you think about it, dude, like we were, you and I were good people, right? And your listeners are good people, but like what this country has become, it's, right? It's really not good, like really, not good, the worst, like we are worse than Rome.
We are worse than Babylon of old, the United States of America. And I mean that and I know that I keep bringing this stuff up but, it's so, On my heart that we have got to get right with God, like we've got to repent because, when this hits, it's going to be too late if you don't have that light inside of you navigating this darkness.
Yeah, and it's actually something recently that I've been more interested in. Have you heard the conversation or seen some of the discussions surrounding the collapse of Rome and actually Rome turning into the throne? Three, if you look at a map and you look at the I forget the name of it. It's a certain monument that's in Washington, DC.
It's also in London and it's also at the Vatican. And so when you look at this, the three different areas that, that these places of this, Gosh I can't remember the term of it, but it's also in from ancient Egypt, but it was essentially a a monument that, was utilized to show between Rome collapsing and then reintegrating itself into the new world, essentially by leveraging the United States as its military arm, London in.
Where the other monument like this is, I believe it starts with an S. I, I just can't I can't think of it, but London being the financial arm and then the Vatican being the spiritual arm of what was originally ancient Rome. Have you, seen that at all?
No, but it doesn't it's all going to repeat itself. It's all going to come together. That's what I was trying to explain to you is that God's gathering his, his the house of Israel, like spiritually, I'm not talking about physically spiritually it's gathering. And then on the flip side, the devil is starting to, bring in all of his house.
Right. And so you're going to see all of these big the who, and the you're going to watch all of them start to come together into one big monster here soon.
Yeah. Yeah. There's a really interesting you should look into it. It's really interesting conversation around how the collapse of Rome was essentially never actually happened. And it was really the integration of the Roman ideology. And that's why you look at the some of the things that people point out about this is that you look to the the types of architecture that is in Washington, DC, Rome, and London.
And the way that they kind of framework, this is that. Each one of those individual I guess what you would call cities are actually their own individual, areas outside of the government in which they are housed within, right? Washington DC is not a part of the, 50 States of the United States, right?
It's its own individual entity. within that, right? Same thing with the Vatican. It's, it actually is not a part of the government. It's not housed within the country that it's in. It's its own subsection of that, right? So they can have their own laws. They can have their own rules. They can have all of these things.
Same, thing with the, financial arm, which is London. And so there's a really interesting conversation that that, I've seen come up pretty recently, actually around that. And I'll have to, I'll send you some stuff on it. It's really interesting. But when you talk about the, spiritual aspect of everything that's happening here, when we look to the, escalation of tensions, right?
We're at a time now where all of the institutions have lost trust. And that's because each one of them is leading with the darkness, right? They're leading with lies. They're leading with manipulation. They're leading with all of the they're, trying to stifle the truth, right?
Each one of these institutions. So when you talk about the three letter agencies, the CIA, the FBI, even when you're talking about the governmental institutions, do you think there's any current institution that isn't compromised?
No, there's not, there are some good people within that are just quiet when you say good, well, they should be speaking out, but there are some that are very aware of what's happening that are just trying to get their 20 years, right? That, that was happening at the police department.
It's I there, there's these cops that knew these things were wrong, but wouldn't say anything about it. For example, Occupy Wall Street. Remember that I worked that downtown Salt Lake City when they did the Occupy. Salt Lake City and it was very dangerous chanting F the police and they only had two of us working at a time You know inside the park they would post this up there and it was like you guys there's only two of us and I put in a complaint and I got in trouble right hey there I don't feel safe, but there's only two of us while there's hundreds and hundreds of people Chanting F the police and you have me in here like some kind of a pawn like that's dangerous You And I and, trouble's the wrong word.
I got in my my, my supervisor was upset, but it turns out that I was right. Right. So, so I didn't get trouble on paper when it started to go up the chain. Oh yeah. Mootsos is right. We need more people in there.
So, so tell me about that. You were a part of the police force for how many years?
Seven.
Seven years. And so that was a part of the, what I alluded to a very beginning of this is you had some of the controversies surrounding that, that kind of maybe speak a little bit more to the values that you hold dearly to yourself.
What, was the situation that you found yourself in that was probably the most high profile out of, everything that you experienced with the police?
Well, and this obviously is part of my book too, I finally made it over to the motorcycle unit. I've got a, I've got a crazy story. It is a, wild story in those seven years. But I finally made it over to the motorcycle unit and was doing really good. We, yes, there are police quotas, a lot of them.
And that was part of the reason why. They didn't like me from within is because I called out their quota system. And, that's how most departments, not all departments, but that's how most departments operate is based off of money, right? You got to get a certain level of arrest to not only get local money, but then you get federal grants based off, of numbers.
Right? And
so when I,
when,
when,
they talk, when you talk about quotas, is that like more of an unspoken rule? Or is that something they're
Oh, absolutely. Yeah, it's unspoken because they know that it's wrong, but they have, there's no other way to do it. When I was a motorcycle cop we had, to get 20 points a day. That was our goal. Well, a one ticket was a point and then a DUI was worth 10 points. So if you got two DUIs in a shift, then you got your 20 points.
So I chose to do more DUIs because I believe, that people shouldn't be driving around drunk, right? When you're giving petty tickets, it just doesn't feel good as a, it's and I'm not saying arresting drunk drivers feels good, but maybe I saved a few lives and I don't know about it. Who knows?
But, when you're giving out a ticket for some stupid thing, cause you got to hit your 20, it sucks your soul a little bit at a time when you're looking at a person who's just driving just how you're going to drive when you go home.
Which there's so many violations on the road.
There's hundreds and hundreds of laws. I don't care who you are. You're breaking the law when you're driving somewhere from point A to point B. And it, so when you're writing these, tickets all the time, it's, it doesn't change behavior. Now, some people would argue it changed behavior, but what about giving somebody a warning?
What about seeing red and blue lights behind you and, that scaring you enough Oh, geez I'm sorry. Yeah, you need to slow down and I'm not. Look, I'm, there are certain people that deserve tickets. Don't get me wrong. But when you create an entire industry. And jobs based off of money that you're getting.
I think it's wrong. Anyway, I called that out. And I got in trouble, but with not actually getting in trouble, I got blacklisted in many ways. Once I called out the quotas and I recorded my sergeant too, just in case they ever say that it didn't happen, it did happen. But when I finally got on the motorcycle squad, I was the number one DUI officer by far.
I think I had 160 DUIs in that year. And then, the next person below me had 85. I was a hard worker, right? Never been written up. Never had an IA. Never had, I never went to IA. I had I had awards in my file. So, I was, I really, put in my heart and my soul to my career, right?
And when I was a motorcycle cop, they wanted five of us to come in and they wanted us to celebrate. in the LGBTQ parade. So they wanted us to, they wanted us to participate. They wanted us to lead the gay parade in our police uniforms. And when I saw that assignment, I can't explain it to you, but it was, every it's maybe how people felt during the vaccine.
Don't do that. Do not take it. That's how I felt. It was dark and this is nothing against gay people. I just don't believe it theologically. Does that make sense? So I don't hate anybody. But because we live in this such polarized idea that if disagree with someone's lifestyle that you must hate them.
No, I love you. There's nobody on planet earth that I hate. I don't, some people I don't like and I wouldn't hang out with. But I don't hate anybody. And so I was asked to trade assignments. I said, Hey, I went to another cop, and I said, Hey, will you be in the parade? And I will do your traffic post.
And he's yeah, no problem. So we switched spots. An hour later, an email comes down that says there will be no trading positions in and out of this. And I'm like, I knew that they knew that I got a trade, or they would have never said that because it's within our policy to trade. They were upset. At least that Sergeant was upset that I got a trade and they were going to force me into something that they knew was against my faith.
Because I believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. That is the very definition of marriage. And when I say these things, you have to understand I'm a sinner too. I'm a sinner. I got problems, but I believe in a, value system that I try to live by. Right. I believe that we are.
quickly devolving literally into animals. There's now furries in Utah in these, and I covered this story and I'm the bad guy for covering the story that there's a whole bunch of kids, dressing up as furries pooping on the floor in some of these schools. I'm getting reports.
Well, you, if you The bad guy, I think it depends on who you ask. Right. And I think honestly,
I'm just saying in the media now,
I'm the bad guy. Like I exposed, let me go let me go back. So, Because I'll go off on a tangent. So they called me in the office, because I said, hey look I don't I sent an email, really professional, hey, I don't hate anybody, I love all people I just don't feel that the police should be involved in this speech.
Because, it is free speech. What they're trying to do is normalize it because the police are involved in it. And now look at us now. What has the state become? Well, the state has become, ironically, the forced religion. The religion, that we weren't supposed to have a separate separation of church and state.
Well, guess what? The L-G-B-T-Q to a lot of people is a religion. It is a dogma. It is. It is a faith. they believe this as much as some people believe in God. And so, I was not going to bow down to that false God religion. Because that's what it is in my opinion. And I, and again, I know that there's going to be some people that are gay listening.
I love you. And I hope you know that. I love you. I just don't believe that's the order of heaven. Because God wants us to become like him,
Well, when.
He wants us to become perfect like him.
right. and when you look at the military, I was in the military, so I did four years in the Air Force, and when you look at the military, they would, you would get in trouble if you are found being a part of a parade, if you're found to be a part of a protest, and you're in uniform when you do it,
that's an advocation by the establishment, right?
So
Like, even if, is that it's against our policy to wear something over your uniform. But yet the chief of police and all the lieutenants and all the sergeants and some officers, they're all wearing the gay lay the Hawaiian gay thing over their uniform.
Right, exactly. And so you're, when you're in a position of power, which is what you are, whether you're in the military, whether you're a police officer, whether you're in whatever position that you're in, that if you're advocating for a certain if any of the police officers that were in your unit wanted to go there and dance in the parade or support them while not In their uniform or representing the police force, let alone.
That's perfectly fine. Let alone forcing people to advocate for something that maybe they don't believe in. And to your point I'm, passive in the same way that you are. You do what you want to do. I have no, no, problems with anybody who, is. gay or lesbian. Now, when we get into the, TQIA plus
Well, and kids,
community, that's a whole other issue.
It's, we could, that's a whole other speaking of tangents that we can get into is the, hijacking of what is a sexual preference into being what is a fetish, personal fetishes that are then being enforced on youth. But back to the original conversation, which is that there's no reason at all.
In my opinion, and coming from the opinion of somebody who worked for the government in a position that wore a uniform that would, we would not be allowed if you went to a gay parade in your ABUs or in your blues, your dress blues we would have, gotten in trouble. Right, let alone forcing somebody to be in the police force to be a part of that and show that the police force is now advocating for this, against whatever their religious beliefs are, there should, the Supreme Court has ruled on this, they said, I believe it was the, it was the bakery that said that they didn't want to bake cakes for somebody who was asking them to.
Yeah. Jack Phillips. Yeah, that was Jack Phillips. That was about the same time period. Cause my story was about 2014 and I think his was either 2012, 2013. In fact I ended up, talking to him,
to Jack Phillip. Yeah. Because when he heard my story and I guess I should finish the story. So, a couple of days go by.
And I get this text message from my deputy chief, who's one of the highest of the high up in this. Hey we want to see, we need to see you on Wednesday in my office. And dude, my, my heart, like I, I immediately knew I'm like, this is not good. This is not good. Don't worry. We just want to talk.
And I'm just like yeah, I don't believe you. I don't believe you. And it turns out they didn't just want to talk. They took my badge and my gun for discrimination. And dude I, don't know how to explain it. It's even like thinking about, I go right back to that moment. It was like everything flipped upside down.
I couldn't believe what I was hearing and I remember like I as a, shoot, how old was I? 30, I don't know, 32, 33, right around that point. I'm crying dude. Like I'm literally crying. I can look down and I've got tears splashing my badge and they took my badge. They took my gun. Like I'm some kind of a criminal dude.
Drove me home took all my stuff. And then two days later, all of a sudden my entire, story, Was blasted all over national news, officer refuses gay pride parade, which wasn't even true. So it wasn't even a true story. It was, absolute lie from the Salt Lake Tribune that I didn't want to protect gay people.
That was the narrative. And so. I'm now in, I'm now in like complete disarray. I don't know how I'm going to, I don't know what I'm going to do. And then the police department comes out and condemns me in front of everybody. We don't tolerate bias, bigotry, or hatred. So they didn't even do an investigation, bro.
They,
I was on, what's that?
and smeared you publicly within the mainstream media.
Oh dude I didn't, even get a chance to go through the process. Right? Hey this is under, investigation where we can't comment. It's under, oh no, don't tolerate bias, bigotry or hatred. Threw me under the bus, dude.
And when that happened, I am, I knew it was over. There's, why in the hell would I want to go work for a, for an organization that doesn't, that is not inclusive, that is not diverse, that is not loving, that, that, is not tolerant, because that's who these people are. They, are tolerant unless you disagree with them, unless you have your faith.
And so, That happened 10 years ago, dude. That was probably the most, it was one of the hardest things that I've ever had to deal with in my whole life
really.
Because, a difficult thing for you to deal with too, Because,
the reason that knowing at least having this conversation with you and knowing a little bit about your personality, it seems like your, values and your morals drive your decisions every day. And that's very
likely. dude I, you got to understand like I'm a sinner, right? I, yeah. You got to understand I believe these things as an ideal, but I fall short all the time. And so when I talk about this stuff, people think that I'm somehow, I think I'm better than someone else. And I'm, and I do not believe that.
I must, I'm like, I look at myself as a very, imperfect person who needs a lot of help on a daily basis who needs to repent. But there are certain things that I just, I can't live with. Right. It's like I, I couldn't knowing how I felt when that assignment came down, I couldn't go and do that and then live with myself.
Right. I couldn't
because I don't believe it.
It's crazy to me to see that happened in Salt Lake City of literally any city within the United States of America.
well, well, Salt Lake City like I said, our state, man, we're quickly turning blue. And it's because we have so many nice Christians here. The kind of worship, not all, but there's many Christians that worship the gospel of nice and no quarrels, no contention. That's the highest level of, of, goodness when that's not true.
Like it's we, have to stand up for truth. If we do not stand up for truth, we don't have, we won't have a, country. Does that make sense? It's like we, I try to articulate this to people. When you have something and you have a certain knowledge and you don't live up to that knowledge, where much is given, much is required.
And so Salt Lake City of all places is that we should have been a city that everybody looked to Utah wow, those guys got it right. But unfortunately, we are falling fast. I don't know if you've read the book, The Letter to the American Church, but on my podcast, I had a man named Eric Metaxas.
And he wrote this incredible book called letter to the American church. And it's just about how Marxism has infiltrated our churches and it's all going down in the name of niceness. You just have to, you just have to be really nice and not bring this stuff up because if we bring this stuff up as Christians, that's not what Jesus would do.
And, I submit that's the exact opposite. Jesus, his very first words were to repent. Literally his first words on his mortal mission, repent. That means that we need to turn back to God. And right now our country is on the verge of complete destruction because of, what we've allowed from abortion to this sexual perversion that has entered into our school system.
That's, in cartoons, right? This whole they, them, man, I'm telling you dude, like we are, inches away from Being wiped off this, the face of this planet right now because we totally, screwed it up.
And so you spoke to a few things there and I'll touch on a couple of them. So the first one being the infiltration of liberal ideology within the church. I can't tell you how many churches I've drove past. in the last six months that are hanging a trans flag outside of their church. It's in, and again I'm somebody who's struggled with their faith several times throughout my lifetime and is still trying to work on that and grow in that, aspect of my life and find myself there, whatever that means. Right. But, even just seeing that and being so puzzled by the idea that, there would be some sort of, It is social infiltration of the ideologies that we're seeing that are very much founded in sexual perversion, right? Let's, put the Bible aside and let's just say you look at what's happening with the, trans ideologies the, hyper sexualization through TV shows, which you mentioned as well.
All of those things that are the and, to find that within a church setting, something that is so. so. I don't know the right word for it. So sensitive, right? When you're putting yourself in a position of authority, when it comes to spirituality between somebody else and God, right?
The, amount of power that you can wield within that setting is alarming if you utilize it the wrong way. We saw that
within some of the things that have come out from the Catholic Church and so the other ways that, that faith has been weaponized and utilized by bad people, bad actors within those, settings to, to utilize that framework as a way to push their own ideologies or their own perversions or their own their own wants and needs, whether it be monetization, money, sexualization, those types of things.
So to, to see that being outright pushed in front of a church where the very doctrine that these people claim to, to worship speaks pretty, at least from my familiarity of it, pretty clearly on those, subjects. And so to, see them just be outright just, Against the, very thing that they claim to, to represent is, pretty alarming, right?
And, to say that like 2014 a decade ago when this happened to you, so to see that already within a community that is very of, I would say any, city that at least I know of within the United States, Salt Lake and, Utah specifically is very, religious in, this sense.
And so to see that happened all the way back 10 years ago as a precursor to what we're seeing today, specifically, not
Yeah. the institutions of the government with the police force, but also within the churches themselves over the last couple of years.
Well and I don't know if it was a vision or whatever, however you want to look at it, but I saw what was coming. Like when I had my experience, I just had it just in my mind's eye. Right. Like when you think ahead it's like we're talking about the digital currency. We see that this is going to be a very, real possibility.
Right. And so I saw. All of this stuff happening. I saw it, dude. I saw the sexualization of kids, what they were going to do. I was even warning on Facebook 10 years ago about pedophilia stuff, about, minor attracted people. I posted about that 10 years ago and people thought I was nuts.
It's unbelievable.
Hmm. was trying to warn people even way back then, this is coming.
This is coming. This stuff's coming. And so that's why you can't change definitions like marriage. I don't care if people want to have a civil union. Great. Get the government out of all of our, relationships. Right. But, when you start to change definitions, that was the floodgate, bro. And I said that, I said, if you change the definition of marriage, which is, Between a man and a woman.
If you change that, anything can go. And now what have we seen? What is a woman? You can't even define it. The left cannot define what a woman is. That's, how far we've gone. And what's next age. That's what's
next. I'm telling you, there is no such thing as age. There's no such thing as men and women.
Kids are now animals in school. Age is next and it's going to be pushed at an alarming rate and we are going to be like, how can you even come close to participate? The governor of our state of Utah, Spencer Cox, he vetoed a bill that would prohibit men from playing against girls in girl sports. he vetoed that bill.
Now, luckily the House overrode him or they, the legislators overrode him. But if he had it his way, he would have men. Playing against women and women's sports in the state of Utah, if he had it his way,
wow.
this is to the degree of wickedness that we're at right now. And look, some people think that's hate.
What I'm saying, that's, they think that I'm the one that's hating by, pointing this out. It's not hate. You have to understand that love is truth. Love is light. Love is liberty. That is love. And so when you're speaking this stuff, and this is to anybody who can knows when you post something or you share a thought and you get that opposition, you are truly loving your neighbor.
And a lot of people just don't see it. And so I just say, keep, stay the course, keep speaking truth. Whenever you sacrifice a little bit, and whenever you speak truth, what happens to your soul is you expand light grows brighter every single time you do something that is a sacrifice. yourself, you literally, it grows brighter, that light then attracts the darkness.
And so what's happening is the amount of light that you put into the, call it the universe, in the spiritual realm, as bright as you start to get, you're going to get the opposition, that's how you grow. That's how you can become perfect. Jesus was saying, be there for perfect even as your father in heaven is perfect.
That's, that perfection is, has to do with the light inside of your soul. Not to get too deep into that stuff, but I'm just saying, don't be afraid to speak truth because when you do that, You grow as a spiritual being.
Absolutely. So if you go back to COVID, right, and one of the things that you just talked about was the changing of definitions. Right? The changing of what the meaning of a sound is, right? When we talk about all of the different things, whether it's what is a woman, right? They're literally the Oxford dictionary has changed the definition, right?
You go back to herd immunity. You go back to, there's so COVID, right? The Orwellian changing of, the meaning of a word, right? And even when you talk about things like what, people don't realize is that unless you're like I'm not, I wouldn't say I'm extremely Well, educated, right?
But if you look at the people who go through private school and these high level universities, a lot of them learn Latin. And the reason that you learn Latin is because there's a meaning to the fundamentals, like the syllables within a word, right? When you look at a word like Genesis, you look at a word like Jenna tolls.
Right? The, fundamental, when you break down that word to its Latin derivative, there is a meaning to the sounds that you are making with your mouth that are outside of the definition of a word itself. Right? So when you're talking about something as simple as genitals, right it's, the, fundamental idea of, right, like it's, it goes back to the same derivative of genesis.
Right? The gen, the G E N has its own derivative meaning within the Latin language. So when they're sitting back trying to change the definitions of these things they're, it's literally post modernism in action, right? Post modernism being the idea that they're, the very word that you used at the beginning of this was truth.
Right? That the idea behind postmodernism is that there is no truth. There is no fundamental truth. Eric has his own truth. Austin has his own truth. And regard and dependent on which reality and, body that you occupy, each individual person has their own idea of what truth is, but we know that's not true, right?
There's math, right? Regardless of who you are, two plus two equals four. Right. 2 plus 2 doesn't equal 5. That's the whole Orwellian idea of, this changing of, reality to suit the need of the oppressor, right? To suit the need of the government. They, want to, break down the idea of
Well, everything has to be a lie. I think by the time the devil's up, he has to flip everything upside down in order to have that king, literally everything upside down. Because, ultimately, can I just give you my take on our death? Do you ever just sit and think, why am I here on earth?
Do you ever think that kind of stuff?
Absolutely.
I've,
Okay. So I'm going to tell you why in my belief. Okay.
So I'm a, Latter day Saint, right? So the Mormons, right?
That's what I am. And I get it. There's going to be a lot of people in your audience that are like, okay, here we go. But this is who I am.
Right. So, so you can turn off the podcast or not, but I'm telling you, this is what I believe you were born. You are a child of God, right? And so we're going to get into the Genesis in a second. God the Father and Jesus Christ are perfect beings. They are resurrected. Jesus Christ is resurrected. He has his body.
Do you understand? He didn't shed it. He showed himself to his Apostles. They felt the Prince in his hand. He didn't go shed his body when he went up to the, Father. He is a resurrected being and so is Heavenly Father. We, you and I, if we stay on this path through Christ, we will be saved. We will be resurrected.
Everybody's going to be resurrected. It's just to where you're going to be at. And so I want to read this scripture to you. We were talking about chickens earlier, right? So I'm sure chickens don't sit and think like, why am I here? Maybe, but if one of those chickens had an egg had an egg and it was fertilized, what would that baby chicken look?
What would that baby chicken turn into?
Okay. So, so have you ever heard the term and oak sleeps in the Acorn?
I have not. But it makes sense.
Okay. So the oak tree sleeps in the acorn and properly nourish. It's going to go through a process to become an oak, right? Well, then the question is who are you? So I'm going to read this Romans chapter eight, verse 16. It says, the spirit itself, beareth witness with our spirit that we are the children of God.
And if children then heirs, of God, and joint heirs with Christ, if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together. For I reckon that the suffering of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. So what I'm trying to tell you, Austin, is that you, have the potential, the divine destiny potential to become like Heavenly Father.
And I know that sounds crazy to a lot of people. I know that knows. But if everything shows us the predecessor, like every, predecessor shows that it can become like Heavenly Father. That's why Jesus Christ came. And so we will have, we will, so what I'm trying to say is there's two destinies. Okay.
Why are you here on earth? There's two destinations. We can either become like God, which is an identity, a destiny, a divine, destiny. An eternal posterity because if you could, you have kids, right?
Yes.
Are your kids the greatest joy that you've ever had in your life?
The greatest part of my, every day. Absolutely.
Okay. So, so do you think, and you don't have to answer me, but do you think that God is going to take the, that ability away from you in the next life to have kids? Well, just think about it because I don't, I believe that. That posterity is an eternal posterity. That's why he promised Abraham the sands of the sea, because when you are resurrected, your body parts still work.
Do you understand? So on the flip side, so that's, the one destination. And there's another scripture too, I can even tell you. So basically in that one, it says. And if children, then heirs, of God and joint heirs with Christ, if so be that we suffer with him. And then there's one other scripture in the book of Revelation that I'd like to share with you.
And that's Revelation chapter 3 verse 21. It says, To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I have overcame and sat down with my father in his throne. And so that's amazing because that's, a promise. And so that's why I'm trying to tell you as sons and daughters of God, whoever you are listening, you, the divine, the divinity within sight of you, none of us can comprehend.
None of us can comprehend. That's, that is the plan of salvation. That's why our families are so important. That's why fundamental unit of heaven is a family. Male and female. Now on the flip side, what do you think the devil wants? Well, the devil wants us to become like him. identity, no destiny.
separated from everybody else with, no sense of self or self
Okay. Keep going.
or woman or,
That's
right. They,
Right.
I'm telling you, dude, like this spiritual nature on the devil doesn't want you to have body parts. Why? Because he doesn't have body parts. And that's why this sexual revolution that's happening is so unbelievably demonic because he's getting people literally prepared for hell.
Remember the two destinations to become like God with an eternal posterity or to become like the devil with no ability to procreate and you are damned. That is the literal word for damned is damn. You're stuck. You cannot progress if you are not having children.
That's interesting. I haven't, I literally like from the, verbal speaking about the Genesis or the Latin derivatives, when you talk about damn in the way that you utilize that term and damned is the same way that just how you pointed that out is your the same way a beaver creates
a damn. burnt as a stubble. That's why he's saying you're a little tree, you're bush, you're as a stubble. It means you're not producing fruit. The fruit is your children. And so I'm just trying to tell you that dude, like you're here for a reason. And you're not a bug. You're not a tree.
You're not a plant. You are a child of God. And I hope that resonates with whoever's watching this because that is the most fundamental truth. And when you know that, and when you know how much God loves you, think about how much you love your kids. And there's nothing that they can do that's going to stop that love.
That's how much God loves you. so that's why I'm always trying to talk about repentance because there's so many people that they don't dare to go to God because they don't think that he'll understand what they've done or what they've been through. And I'm here to testify that he has seen it all.
It doesn't matter what you've done. You can go to God and he will forgive you in a second. Because he wants that relationship with you. I know that. And I know that because I go through repentance processes all the time. And, if he can forgive me, he can forgive you
Sure. And I guess it translating that from the religious to the spiritual. Well, Right? To me, when you talk about the acorn becoming the, tree, right?
the
oak,
right?
Yeah, better stated that way is that the way that I can perceive God the way that I can feel God is that God is the Permeating and infinite everything around us.
He created everything. He is everything. He's a part of us today And I think that when you know, there's some sense that I, feel from people who are hesitant towards religion the, organized the, organized sense of religion that, that is man made as opposed to the spiritual connection with that is God.
And that, that the sometimes as we speak to the way that religion has been weaponized or manipulated and into being something that maybe get some people to, not want to be to explore that, that, that feeling or that familiarity, right? That everybody, historically, every single culture, every single country has a religion.
Every single human
right? calling to connect with whatever it is that, that there is. infinite everything is that, some cultures have proclaimed as this, name or that name but, there is a good and an evil and in the proclivity to move towards the things that are good, right?
That, the infinite everything that moves you towards the light, right? That, that there there's a, way to look at the things that we're talking about here from a sense that is maybe a little bit more. available to people who aren't religious, right? Who, see the things that are playing out today and, realize that there is a good, there is an evil, right?
And there, is something that is a core foundation of every single human being. I am you, and you are me, right? We, there, there's differences in, variables within our maybe genetic makeups. It's very, very slightly as we talk about percentage wise, but micro differences in our genetics, but we are cut from the same cloth.
We are all acorns that came from the oak tree?
Where this, where the seed, where this that's God, bro. That is
literally heavenly father. And that's when you know that, and it's such a comforting thing wow, like the, he's really there and he's just see, but he won't intervene on agency. That's one thing that people don't realize, he cannot force you to do anything. The devil wants to force you to do everything. His kingdom is all about force. His kingdom is all about manipulation and coercion. And I think what's happening, I don't know how deep you've got into the scriptures, but the devil, the reason why he was cast out of heaven is because he wouldn't follow the commandments.
He wanted to be above everybody. He didn't want to be one with, he wanted to be above the stars. And so when he and his minions is a third of the host of heaven were cast down, they were cast out because they couldn't follow the commandments in the kingdom of God. So what the devil has done, counterfeit, is he's created a counter kingdom.
He's created a kingdom that, that looks very similar to the kingdom of God, but everything's fake from the water to the food, to the air, to what we watch, the whole propaganda, everything is fake and what happens is he will force you to bow down for your job, for status, for wealth, for whatever that is.
You have to bow down in order to stay in his kingdom and what happens so this is going to blow your mind What do you think happens so that so God he has commandments But the devil has demandments and what happens when you don't follow the demandments The exact same thing that happened to him you are cancelled You are cast out of the kingdom.
You are a racist, homophobic, whatever it whatever phobe you are done because you would not bow down to his demandments. That's what I think is happening. It's the counterculture of the devil,
Yeah, absolutely. And when you look at things like you mentioned that just there, right The the you're a transphobe. You're a, the, you're a anti Semite. You're a this, you're a that. Right.
right wing extremist.
I've had people, I've had people chase me down in bars. Like I went to a, startup founders meeting in, my local city here and did not expect anybody to come up with, To come up to me and recognize me, or I got chased around a bar for 15 minutes by this guy calling me a right wing conspiracy theorist, literally
wouldn't stop. This guy was, he was actually a local democratic, running. Yeah. He was running for a local democratic role.
And he chased me around this bar at Right.
a nice location, right, trying to label you, trying to this, I, this guy was pretty intoxicated at the time, to be fair but he knew who I was, he chased me around Austin Adams, the far right guy.
Podcaster is dude, you don't even you, probably hate this person. You probably hate these people. It's you don't even know my ideologies. you don't know anything about me. I don't have any problem with this or with that or with this or with that. But the problem is the labels, right? The problem is that it's so easy to throw on a Jersey, a blue Jersey or a red Jersey, right?
And say, that's the bad guy right there. That person right there represents everything that I hate. But there's nuance to everything. I, after talking to this fairly belligerent individual for maybe after he chased me around and I just stopped, I put down my beer. I looked at them and I said, Hey, what do you want to talk about?
What do you have a problem with what I've said about anything at all? Let's talk about it. Let's have a conversation about it. I'm interested. What do you think that I've said that is wrong? And he said, oh, you're a transphobe you're a homophobe, you're a this, you're a that. I said, look I broke down each individual part of his conversation, said you're wrong here, I don't believe that, I believe this.
And eventually I got to a point where this guy was like in his belligerent voice I don't think you're that bad. It's I feel like we would probably have that same conversation with 90 percent of people on the opposite side of the, wearing the different
color jersey that we're wearing today,
if we sat down with them and let them speak their piece in a personal setting, right?
That they, you would find very quickly that. Almost everybody isn't a far right this, isn't a far left this,
but when you get, when you look at social media, when you look at the mainstream media, that's the promoting culture is that there has to be an enemy for on both sides. Otherwise it's not profitable, right?
If there's not a 90 and it keeps you away from the actual problem, which is classism. Right.
Which is the idea that there is a very, elite class of individuals at the point 1 percent of things that are have controlled politicians that have controlled the music industry that have controlled the, movie industry that have controlled Hollywood, that have controlled every single part of the highest echelon of American culture for so long.
Those are the people that we should be yelling at. Those are the people that we should be chasing down in bars. Those are the people that we should make feel shame every time they leave their house. But instead they want us fighting amongst each other about race. They want us fighting amongst each other about your, political ideologies, your stance on this, your stance on that.
When there is a real enemy out there Right. now that is causing this, divide, causing these issues and wants us fighting amongst ourselves, Rather than fighting against the real issue, which is the very, and I'm not talking about rich people. Hell, I want to be rich. You want to be rich. Everybody wants to have money.
And, by the grace of God or the, infinite, everything one of us will be right. If we make the right.
product, that's capitalism. And I love capitalism, but That's not talking about the people that were born into ungodly sums of money that utilize that to weaponize it against us every single day to continue to make those profits like what was outlined in Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars.
Yeah. So I'm of the sense of even you said chasing them down noncompliance is the answer. If everybody would have just not worn a
Right.
And if everybody just not would have done gone to work, and if everybody been like, no, that's not happening, none of this would have happened and they would have no power.
We give them their power.
Absolutely.
And so to me, massive noncompliance when they say something, you better question it. Why? Well, we need to do this for safety. Oh, we've heard that one before. Well, we need to do this for the greater good. Oh, okay. Yeah, we've heard that one before, too. And we're not going to, it's not happening.
And if everybody did that, they would have no power.
And you saw the very first thing that they did in COVID was create literally created the jersey. You have the people who are wearing masks. Still today and did then, and the people who would refuse it, who I got into, I can't tell you how many arguments with people at the grocery store, with people at the even outside, like it was crazy to see, but what they did is they created a Jersey.
That you got to wear either your pro mandate or anti mandate. And they decided to make us fight amongst ourselves rather than fighting against the real enemy, which was the one that not only caused the mandates that obliterated hundreds of thousands, if not millions of business owners, but also stopped people from being able to say goodbye to their mothers while they were passing away in
the process. And, all of these horrible, atrocious things that were growing on during COVID that are so much further deeper seated issues that are still not addressed today, mind you, than wearing a mask, which again, the mask was a symbol, for which team you were on and the enforced compliance that regardless of what you think.
We're still going to make sure that you do this or you can't buy groceries.
Well, and it was a spiritual symbol of no, no voice, no choice, no identity. You literally can't even see who you are. It was very symbolic spiritually.
Absolutely. And so as we move in and then that's, and that's the thing that I fairly appreciate about you, Eric, is that you're willing to, question. And something that I'm not seeing very consistently among the what would generally be considered the conservative or whatever influencers that are out there there's, a very small handful of us out there that are still questioning the government.
Right. Regardless of the narratives that we're, they're trying to spoonfeed us, whether you're a conservative or a liberal or a Democrat is that when it comes to things like Israel I'm, Anti anti war and anti mainstream wholesale of buying the mainstream narrative, if they are feeding it through every mainstream media that's out there, whether it's supposed to be a Republican thing or a Democrat thing, should be questioned.
Right. It should be vetted and it should be, it should, you should find out exactly what you truly believe, not what you're being told to believe, whether you're a Democrat, who's being told that masks work when this every bit of science tells you it's not, or you're a Republican being told that you should promote the, war in Israel, regardless of how many innocent lives that are lost as a result.
Yeah. And everybody, that's why it turns out that the commandments were a good thing. It turns out like loving your neighbor. is a good thing. It turns it turns out, don't do this all the things that God was saying turns out to be true. And if everybody just did that, then we'd get back.
We somehow find, some kind of peace. But I feel like everything's just really ramping up at such a pace. And the reason why it is because the light is shining on the darkness and the darkness has to justify why. And it's going to get very violent. that, that, is the next, they don't have any other moves now that we, that everybody's starting to wake up and shine the light on them.
The only moves that they have left is to get violent. And I just, I pray to God that we just don't get sucked into a civil war. And we just say, we're not fighting. We're not doing that. That's not gonna happen. Now, defending yourself, yes, Of course. I fear that we're gonna, we're gonna, we can have a draft here soon.
They want us in a, they want us in a third world war right now to stop this election coming up. They, need that. They need a
And meanwhile, Netanyahu's son is sitting on a beach in Miami and
won't even, right? Isn't that crazy? They want to draft, they want to draft our children. They want to draft me. They want to draft you. They want to draft all these American citizens. But the son of the individual who decided
to cause tell you everything.
exactly right.
You go back to
That should tell, you
Black, Sabbath war pigs. Generals gathered in their masses, right, just sitting there there's, so many cultural situations that during times like this have pointed this out. The most powerful people don't send their sons to the military. They don't because they know what
Oh it's a chess game being played with it with the emotion and the lives of the middle and lower class that is used to profit from the upper and in like highest level 001 percent of individuals.
So this is just a game that is played and you go I'll reference this just because I think it's such an important document. When you go back to that silent weapons for quiet wars document, it talks about how war is utilized as a way for checks and balances to not only. Be able to utilize the war machine to make profit by pushing money from taxpayers to the, organizations that fund it, but also by making checks and balances by eliminating human lives, When you have a finite amount of money across in a social or a governmental ecosystem, like the United States of America, and you eliminate taxpayers. People like the amount of individuals within that country, you are actually making it so that the value of a dollar becomes higher because there's less people owning that money, right? So when war is used as a checks and balances for, inflation. And that's one of the scariest things that was within that document.
It's we're here man, but ultimately I'm very thankful to be alive in such a time as this. And I just, I, when I get back to God, I want to say I tried, I was a screw up, but I tried I could see what you were trying. I could see what you wanted me to do. Even though I failed, I tried.
And I hope that's I just want to be able to look back and be like, didn't sit quiet when I saw all that. I at least put it out there I try to tell people about liberty because the liberty is heaven. That's in 1st Corinthians or 2nd It says where the spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty and You can't have liberty without morality freedom freedom plus bad choices equals captivity because freedom and liberty aren't the same thing.
You can have that freedom, but if you don't do good with it, that does not equal. So, so in other words, freedom plus morality equals liberty. only way that we can have liberty is to do what's right.
Absolutely.
And I think that's something, to me, when we're talking about this doom and gloom and this battle versus good and evil, I believe wholeheartedly that good is winning right now, today. And I don't think that we could say that four years ago. But I do believe that there are so many people that have woken up to the atrocities that are happening, the ideologies that are being pushed on people.
And I think even culturally, when it comes to things like comedy, and all of these different cultural movements. You're seeing that there is a large group of people that are waking up to these things that are wanting to not only be aware of them, but make other people aware of them and do something about it.
And that to me, as we're moving into what you say, maybe the next 10 years of the potential most difficult parts of our lives, if not the lives of most of humanity, and in us as a species, that it is encouraging to me. That now more than ever, just like when John Locke had the great awakening, right?
The great, the enlightenment period, where they realized that we don't need anybody to speak to God, right? There was that great enlightenment that allowed us to move away from Great Britain and realize that we, as a culture, don't need to speak through somebody else to have that connection.
I believe there's another great awakening that's happening today, and I believe that to be true.
is encouraging as we move towards the times that they are pushing for these wars. They are pushing for these things to happen. And I believe that we, as it stands, and people like you and me, who have this staunch moral compass that says if you want me to do anything that's against what my fundamental beliefs are, I'm not doing it.
I won't do anything about it. I'm going to speak up, I'm going to speak out, I'm going to
make change happen. And I'm encouraged about the way that this society is moving. So.
Absolutely. well, and you have to understand too that if you can be awake, but if you don't make good decisions, then that light is going to be even darker because it will condemn you. Does that make sense?
Absolutely. Well, Eric, on that note, I think that's a great way to wrap this up here. I appreciate your time. That was an awesome conversation. Like you said, maybe not the one that we had originally outlined, but I appreciate you. Thank you so much for coming on the show. I'd love to have you back. I think that was a great conversation and as things start to play out, we'll see that more and more.
But thank you so much for being here. I appreciate you. Can you talk about some places where everybody can find you?
All right. Well, go check it out. Read his book, listen to the podcast, watch the documentary, all of that stuff. Great conversation, Eric. Thank you so much for being here.
Adams archive.
-
Welcome to the Adams Archive! Join Austin Adams as he takes you on a journey through history, current events, and deep dives into intriguing topics. In this episode, Austin dives into the true history of Revolutionary War, uncovering hidden reasons behind the conflict. But that's not all! From shocking revelations about the COVID vaccine to discussions on melatonin supplements and their impact on children, mysterious links between cat owners and schizophrenia, and the untimely passing of a TikTok influencer, this episode is packed with jaw-dropping content. Plus, get ready for a deep dive into the world of banksters and warmongers, exploring the connections to the Revolutionary War. Don't miss out on this captivating episode! Subscribe for more thought-provoking content and hit the like button if you enjoy it!
-
Protect yourself and your family from the perils of modern technology now with Ronin.
Welcome to the Adams Archive. In this podcast we peel back the layers of official narratives to explore the intersection of advanced technology, government intrigue, and the ethics of scientific ambition.
Artificial Eclipses: Uncover the startling revelations surrounding engineered celestial events, exploring the technology capable of creating artificial solar eclipses.
The Dawn of De-Extinction: Step into the laboratories where the lines between past and future blur, as companies claim to possess the technology to resurrect extinct creatures. From mammoths to dinosaurs, examine the scientific breakthroughs, the dreams, and the ethical dilemmas posed by playing god with nature's design.
Targeted Voices: The chilling confession of a CIA operative admitting to targeting Alex Jones sheds light on the power struggles between the state and the individuals daring to challenge it. Explore the implications of these admissions for freedom of speech, media integrity, and the right to dissent in a digital age.
All the Links: For episode transcripts, bonus content, and direct engagement with the Echoes community, click here: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams Dive deeper into our investigations and become part of the movement unraveling the mysteries of our time.
----more----
Full Transcription
Adams Archive.
Hello, you beautiful people, and welcome to the Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we're going to have to cover a lot of ground, starting with the fact that Julian Assange could have his prosecution thrown away, according to Joe Biden.
Biden. Now we'll talk why I think he might be saying this. Maybe it has something to do with gaining popularity in a time where your dog wouldn't want to vote for him, but that's beside the point we'll read through that article together and talk through some of the more nuanced conversations surrounding Julian Assange.
From there, we're going to discuss somebody of high, Notoriety within the AI community. What some people call the Godfather of AI warning about battle robots. If that sounds terrifying to you, then we're on the same page. So we'll discuss that after that. We'll talk about how plants. allegedly scream when they're being harvested.
That's a terrifying visual. Then we'll jump into the Alex Jones situation. So Alex Jones, if you don't know, had the full force of the FBI, the CIA, they completely obliterated him in court. He over the Sandy Hook. It's a crazy situation that he had. I think it was a billion dollars is what they said that he owed these defendants, which is like the most egregious of all hearings in the history of the American judicial system.
So there was some updates on that, which is the fact that there was an individual from the FBI. Who came out and got caught on camera in one of the, I don't believe this was actually private project Veritas, but it was very project Veritas ask in the way that it was a gay man who somebody found on either grinder or Tinder.
And apparently that's the only way that you can find these people who are willing to talk about this type of stuff. Um, but we'll actually watch the video where this man from the FBI comes out and, and admits that the FBI actually, um, Went after Alex Jones to make an example of him and how you might ask.
Well, we'll talk about that in just a little bit. Uh, we'll go through a couple articles about that. Then we'll talk about this new biomedical pharmaceutical company, I guess, biomedical company that's claiming that they're going to do something that has been shown rendition of this. ever, which is the fact that this company is saying it's called Colossal Biosciences.
And apparently, they're going to de extinct animals, starting with a mammoth. And if that doesn't terrify you, I don't know what will. So we'll talk about the implications of that. We'll talk a little bit about the company and the people that are behind it. All of that, and then the last discussion we'll have today, and we might have one more, but if we have time, we'll, we'll talk about that.
If we don't, the last thing we're going to talk about is the solar eclipse. So everybody went crazy over the solar eclipse. There was all these conspiracy theories about how there was earthquakes and all of this craziness, and there was going to be an EMP and mass chaos was going to break out. Well, it's been kind of silent since then.
That eclipse just a couple of days ago. And I held my opinion on this a little bit for a reason. Cause I don't know if I believed any of these things. Some people were saying that the solar eclipses were fake and all this crazy stuff, but then I saw this article that came out. And it talks about, I think, I believe it's a Swedish or German, German article, um, talks about a technology that could be utilized to create eclipses.
Hmm. That's interesting. It's called the ESA proba three, and it's a satellite, I guess, two satellites. And we'll actually read more about this together, but two satellites that essentially can cause pseudo eclipses. Why would they want to do that? Guess what? We'll talk about it. So all of that and more. And if we have time, we'll see just how far we get into this and how deep we go, but we might have a little bit deeper, darker, conspiratorial thing to discuss just after that.
So all of that and more, but the first thing I need you to do before we can dive deep into those conversations is hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review, you know, I know that you know, that I know. How much I appreciate you. I think there was something in there that, that was probably linguistically correct.
So I appreciate you go ahead and hit that five star review button. It takes 10 seconds out of your day. And honestly, it means a lot to me. I read every single one of the reviews. Every time I see a new review, even if you don't write anything, it just, it, it honestly makes this worth it to see that you guys appreciate it.
So if you haven't yet. Back out of this podcast while you're listening to it, hit the five star button. It takes 10 seconds out of your day. And it honestly means the world to me. I would appreciate it more than, you know, and if you feel so inspired, write something down, tell me what you love about it.
Tell me what I should improve about it. Anything and everything you can think of, put it in there. Tell me your favorite. I don't know your favorite chips and salsa brand company. I don't know. I'd maybe I need some good salsa brands. I don't know. Whatever the fuck, whatever you can think of, just throw it in there.
Tell me what you love about the podcast though. Seriously. And leave a five star review. I would appreciate it from the bottom of my heart. And just to remind you. I am launching Ronin Ronin is my Faraday goods company, and we are going to have backpacks baseball hats beanies phone sleeves, laptop sleeves, wallets, all of these things specifically to help you protect yourself from modern technology, whether it be EMF radiation, which Robert F.
Kennedy juniors talked at length about Andrew Huberman, all of those people I've mentioned that before, whether it be a stop people from swiping your credit card, Information from you, even when you didn't know what happened with RFID blocking materials for wallets, or whether it's helping you shut off, shut down and eliminate your digital footprint with our Faraday backpacks, which essentially block all inbound and outbound signals from your phone, from your laptop stops, the government stops corporations from being able to track you all of that nasty stuff that they're constantly doing.
That is what I've been working on. That's why I've. Maybe had a few less podcasts more recently is because I've been diving head first into creating the by far best Faraday goods company in existence in the world today and for the future. So keep an eye out for that. The website, if you want to go check it out, there are some products listed right now.
The wallets will actually be in next week. So if you want to go check those out and buy a Ronin wallet. Again, RFID blocking. You can head to Ronan, uh, ronanbasics. com, R O N I N B A S I C S, ronanbasics. com, and you can actually get a wallet that will be shipped to you like within a week, I'll get it to you.
No big deal. Now the rest of the stuff, I'm still working with the manufacturers and the suppliers and helping with the design and everything, because I want to make sure that it's perfect for you. But the hat that I have in my head right now is a Ronan hat and just a couple more tweaks to go, and it will be awesome.
Chef's kiss. So keep an eye out for that. Ronan basics. com. All right. That's all I got for you. Let's go ahead and jump into it.
The Adams archive.
I should have been a music producer in a past life. Cause I promise you both of the intros that I've made, whether it was for red pill revolution or for the Adams archive is kind of a banger, kind of a banger should have been a music producer, but here I am talking nonetheless. All right, let's go ahead and jump into it.
The very first article that we're going to discuss the very first conversation that we're going to have today is about Julian Assange, Julian Assange, the leader and whistleblower who has. Unloaded a treasure trove of government and corporate corruption over years and years and years of WikiLeaks has since fled the country, fleeing for his life while the full force of the government, the FBI, the CIA, manhunt, manhunt, manhunt going after this man.
And he would be put away for life, but he's been finding himself in Australia, interesting enough, um, who has been sheltering him without extradition to the United States. And now Joe Biden is saying that he's considering dropping the prosecution against Julian Assange. After a request from Australia.
Now, this man should have been pardoned long ago. This man should have been pardoned by Trump. This man should have been pardoned by Obama. Right? The list goes on. This man should have been pardoned long ago. There's no reason. Somebody The only time The true case of authoritarianism is a government that cannot be questioned.
And that's what Julian Assange did. He questioned the government. He questioned their intentions. And not only did he question them, but he exposed them for what they were. He exposed them for all of the corruption, all of the surveillance activities, everything that they were doing that was horrific. You know, you go to wikileaks.
com Or org or something right now. I was actually looking at their archives today. There's a unbelievable list of all of these situations where the government was doing things that it shouldn't have done. From the Guantanamo Bay, uh, interrogation, what is it, enhanced interrogation techniques. Like so many of these things that were atrocious acts by our government that he exposed.
Rightfully, you were doing illegal acts. You should be exposed for those illegal acts. This man exposed you for the illegal acts that you were committing, and now you want to go throw him in jail for committing, for, for, for exposing you. That's authoritarianism. That's abuse. That's abusive behavior. That isn't the act of an abuser, right?
So I would say this is the best thing that Joe Biden has considered. This is the best possible thing. If Joe Biden did this one thing, I would scream the praises of Joe Biden from a mountaintop for about two minutes, but nonetheless, I would still scream is my praise from a mountaintop and it would be that Joe Biden.
Pardons Julian Assange. And so let's go ahead and read this article. It says U S president, Joe Biden says the U S is considering dropping his persecution or prosecution, same thing against WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange. For years, Australia has called on the U S to drop its prosecution against Assange, an Australian citizen who has fought U S extradition efforts from prison in the UK asked about the request on Wednesday, as he hosted Japanese prime minister, Fumio Kishida.
For an official visit, Biden said, we're considering it. Hmm. Interesting. Very interesting.
Assange has been indicted on 17 espionage charges and one charge of computer misuse over his website's publication of a trove of classified U. S. documents almost 15 years ago. American prosecutors allege encouraged and helped U. S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning steal diplomatic cables and military files that Wikileaks Or WikiLeaks published putting lives at risk.
I want you to point me to one person who died within the government as a result of Julian Assange exposing the government and their corruption. Australia argues that there is a disconnect between the US treatment of Assange and Manning. Then US President Barack Obama commuted Manning's 35 year sentence to seven years, which allowed her release in 2017.
Assange's supporters say he is a journalist protected by the First Amendment, absolutely correct, who exposed US military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan that was in the public interest. Correct. Assange's wife, Stella Assange, has said that WikiLeaks founder is being persecuted because he exposed the true cost of war in human lives.
Absolutely correct. She has said that his health continues to deteriorate in prison and she fears he'll die behind bars. A British court ruled last month that Assange can't be extradited to the United States on espionage charges unless U. S. authorities guarantee he won't get the death penalty. Wow. The death penalty for telling the truth.
What kind of world do we live in? That's so crazy that they would even consider that for exposing the truth, exposing corruption, exposing war crimes, exposing an enhanced interrogation. Right? Hmm. So there you go. That would be amazing. That would be a great precedence to set. If you find corruption and you expose corruption, you should be celebrated, not given the death penalty.
Very straightforward. So I hope that happens. I will be So excited to hear if that happens. Like I said, that is the one thing that Joe Biden could do that you would hear my praise about is pardon, Julian Assange, maybe Snowden to throw him on the list, throw him on the list, and then I'll be very happy.
Right. So I hope to see it happen. I hope to see it happen soon. Joe Biden is leaving office office, you know, somewhat, uh, in the near future. And that would be pretty incredible to see that that man walks free. Alright, next situation. This is quite the segue. The godfather of AI warns us of death. Battle Robots!
Now, when I think Battle Robots, I don't know if you remember this, but there used to be the Battle Bots, I think, or Battle Bots Arena, or something like that, where all these kids would like, I say kids, they were probably like 35 year old nerds, awesome nerds, by the way, because the show was Sweet, but they would create these little Circular like Roomba looking things, but they would throw razor blades on them and like little mini chainsaws and like little I don't know missiles or some shit They would have saws on the side of them and like it was the craziest thing ever game show ever where they would literally physically fight these little tiny robots on remote controllers.
I mean, essentially, they were like glorified little RC cars with knives, which I guess is pretty terrifying in itself. But that's what comes to mind. When I think of this, I'm sure you remember that if you are over the age of I don't know. Twenty six. Twenty seven. I think it was even on like Nickelodeon or something at one point.
Like a Nick at night. I don't know. I'm gonna have to go back and watch some of those. Anyways, the technology is becoming more intelligent than people and could take over. Geoffrey Hinton says. Hmm. The world can encounter, the world could encounter major disasters before the use of artificial intelligent weapons is regulated in a proper manner according to Turing award winning scientist Geoffrey Hinton, seen as a pioneer of the AI technology.
The former Google engineer who quit the company last year compared the use of the technology for military purposes to chemical weapons deployment. And I'm going to go ahead and throw this article up for you here so you can follow along with me. And if you can't see it, that's because you're listening and not watching.
And if you want to watch, you can head over to YouTube right now and type in The Adams Archive and you'll find me. Maybe not, because of all the platforms, for some reason, YouTube seems to hate me the most. But head over there, you can actually follow along on the articles as I'm scrolling through these and see them with your own eyes.
But if you're driving, don't do that. Just keep listening to my silky smooth voice. The former Google engineer who quit the company last year compared the use of the technology for military purposes. I just read that, uh, to chemical weapons deployment, warning that very nasty things will occur before the global community arrives at the comprehensive agreement comparable to the Geneva conventions.
And I totally agree with that. I can absolutely see that happening. The third I spoke about is the existential threat. Professor Hinton said on Tuesday in an interview with the Irish broadcaster RTE News, emphasizing that these things will get much more intelligent than us, and they will take over. I'm gonna read that again.
The man who essentially is called the, the man called the Godfather of AI, just said that these things will get much more intelligent than us. And they will take over. The computer scientists highlighted the impact of AI on disinformation and job displacement and also on weapons of the future. One of the threats is battle robots, which will make it much easier for rich countries to wage war on smaller, poorer countries, and they are going to be very nasty, and I think they are inevitably going to be.
And we see that kind of with the way that you see drone strikes, like the drone strike thing has completely changed the war landscape that we've seen between the war in Ukraine, uh, what we're seeing in Israel, like. Drones have changed the game. You can sit back in some hut somewhere and some, you know, trailer in a military base and fly a, fly a plastic plane over somebody and then blow them up or kill them, uh, pretty wild stuff.
So yeah, if you think about how much that has changed warfare. Now think about how sentient ish AI robots armed with machine guns. With immediate reaction times and unbelievable strength and perfect accuracy. Yeah, that's terrifying. One of the threats is battle robots. Just said that he urged governments to put pressure on tech majors, and, uh, especially in California to conduct in depth research on the safety of AI technology, rather than it being an afterthought there should, there should be government incentives to ensure companies put a lot of work into safety.
And some of that is happening. Now, the scientists also highlighted huge benefits that AI can bring to humanity, particularly in healthcare, adding that one does not, that he does not regret any of his contributions to the technology. Despite the mounting interest in AI, several high profile picture, uh, picture figures, wow, in the tech industry have warned about the potential dangers posed by the unregulated adoption of the technology.
Hinton, who quit Google last year, has waged a media campaign to warn of the risks. Tesla CEO Elon Musk, Apple co founder Steve Wozniak and Joshua Bengio, who is considered an AI pioneer for his work on neural networks, were among the top industry figures to co sign a letter last year calling for aggressive regulation of the AI sector.
Now I'll stop reading that to you and tell you this, AI battle robots could be a very bad thing for humanity. like probably humanity ending or it could also be very good for war. And by good for war, you know, my stance on war by now, I think it's useless. I think, but I also think that it will not go away.
War is not going to go away. So to me, I had this thought the other day. And there was an interesting little rabbit hole I found myself down where, think about this. What if AI robots were now the only soldiers in major wars? If you think about it, if their reaction time is way better, if they're literally unkillable, if they are extremely strong compared to humans, they're way faster than us, their accuracy is perfect, they have AI algorithms telling them exactly when a threat goes to reach for anything at any time.
They can kill you from like, two miles away, probably like, it's just literally not going to be a fair fight. So during the time, maybe the near future, the near ish future, we're going to develop these weapons. If we haven't already, and my hunch would be that we already have, but if we haven't developed this already in the very near future, robots, AI battle bots are essentially going to take over the battlefield.
Now, if they do that, and we're in wars with other countries who have essentially replaced their entire fighting force with robots, AI robots, then what if the war was entirely fought between robots? Because essentially, what you're saying is establishing absolute dominance, because if our robots can kill your robots, and our robots could definitely kill all your people, right?
There's no contest, there's no conversation, right? So if our robots just obliterate China's, then China knows that we could essentially just have our robots kill all of them instantaneously or something like that, complete control, right? So, What if wars were no longer fought with people? What if they were only fought with robots in a safe arena esque type of situation?
10 on 10, let's say. 10 US robots versus 10 Chinese robots, and they just fight it out in an arena because then we essentially know we don't need hundreds of thousands of these robots. But if we could just come to a gentleman's agreement, That once the, once the octagon shuts and the robots fire, fire up their engines and whoever is the last robot standing, that country wins the war.
Cause we already know the end result would be if you take that to its furthest extent, that their technology is better. And as a result of your technology being better, you could essentially kill everybody within our country, or we could kill everybody within your country. Interesting thought experiment.
And I kind of just want to see AI BattleBot war arenas as a sport, like betting and like drinking on the sidelines to, you know, two different jerseys, USA flags in the background, China with their, you know, little dinky Chinese flag. And, and, you know, we're drinking beer and they're doing math equations on the sidelines.
I don't know, however far you want to take that analogy. I think it's a cool one. I don't think it's the utopia that's gonna come of this, but nonetheless it's a fun thought experiment. But it does seem to make some rational sense that it could get to that point. There's a sci fi book there you could write, but if you do, at least attribute me in your, you know, your acknowledgments.
Anyways, that's, that's the side tangent when it comes to AI battle bots. Uh, but that's terrifying. Robots could potentially kill us all. I don't know what I think is a bigger threat, whether it be AI or, you know, You know, nuclear bombs, the problem with that scenario that I just gave you, though, is it's not going to be nearly equal, right?
There's still countries who haven't figured out nuclear bombs, right? They don't have the nuclear stockpile that we or Russia or China does. And so if we send these battle bots into, I don't know, Afghanistan or a place where they don't exactly have that much It's not fair. It's just complete dominance and control.
There's nothing you can do. Go watch Terminator. You know where it goes from there. Now on a completely different note, going from non sentient metal objects that are going to act sentient and have the possibility of, I don't know. murdering us all. There's also this flip side of things, maybe equally as terrifying, which is that I came across this article the other day that said that plants scream while they're being harvested.
This new study finds. Now there's something about scream and harvested in the same sentence. That just doesn't quite sit right with me. Now I'm not saying I'm going to go vegan, but I think you're given some vegans, some more ammunition. So let's go ahead and read this article. Um, I actually came across this cool website, Indy 100.
com. I find a bunch of different websites to source some of my news articles and try to do some research for you guys. And this one had some, it had like the top 100 articles and discussions that are being had. Seems like a cool way to kind of source some, some interesting material and find some conversations.
So check it out. Indie100. com. No association. Um, vegetarians, we're afraid we've got some news. Vegetarians, we're afraid we've got some news that you're probably not going to like. Plants emit sounds akin to screams. When they're distressed, according to a new study, I actually got it backwards in the way that I said that a little bit earlier.
Yeah. I guess this is ammunition for carnivores, not vegans. It plants emit screams when they're distressed. According to a new study, I have the most terrifying visual picture in my head right now of a little baby plant, just screaming, uh, they allegedly produce clicking noises that humans can't hear without the use of scientific equipment.
Research has found the research, which was published in, uh, cell back in 2023 showed that plants produce these noises in times of acute distress. Lilac Hadany is an evolutionary biologist at Tel Aviv University. Hadany said, even in a quiet field there are actually sounds that we don't hear, and those sounds carry meaning.
There are animals that can hear these sounds, so there is the possibility that a lot of acoustic interaction is occurring. Plants interact with insects and other animals all the time, and many of these organisms use sound for communication. So it would be very suboptimal for plants not to use sound at all.
That makes sense. The findings show that plants which are distressed have incredibly high pitched popping noises, while unstressed plants do not emit these noises. emit these noises. The study's definition of distressed includes plants that were having their stems cut or were dehydrated. However, it's not yet clear how the plants produce these noises.
Now that we know that plants do emit sounds, the next question is, who does? Might be listening. We are currently investigating the responses of other organisms, both plants and animals, to these sounds and we're also exploring our ability to identify and interpret the sounds in completely natural environments.
Comes after a new study suggests that Western industrial diets may be changing the ways that humans digest plants. As modern diets lack fiber, cellulose found in fruits and vegetables is changing. Hmm. All right. So, that's a terrifying mental image, and now I feel a little bad for, you know, all the, all the weeds that I ripped out of the, the concrete when I was in the military.
Um, anyways, yeah, so now when a vegan comes to you and says, oh, you're hurting those animals. Well, just let them know that plants scream when they eat them, literally, according to this study. I don't really know where to take this from here. It just seemed pretty terrifying. And I had a lot of weird mental images of plants screaming while, while somebody was eating a, I don't know, one of them anyways, really not a ton of places to go from there, but I'm just letting you know, that's more of an FYI than a discussion piece.
Now, it is a discussion piece is the fact that Alex Jones has now come out and said that he's going to be pursuing a lawsuit against the FBI and the CIA for conducting a essentially a hit job on him, including the 1 billion settlement that he was forced to make. Now, it says.
Let's go ahead and see which one we should start with. Alright, it says that Alex Jones, Alex Jones joined Louder with Crowder Wednesday to discuss the massive expose by Sound Investigations, showing a CIA operator Or CIA operatives admission that the FBI and CIA vindictively targeted Jones for destruction.
Jones explained the footage could significantly bolster a free speech lawsuit against the federal agencies for a violation of his civil rights, with which he's hoping tech entrepreneur Elon Musk could assist since the law firms coming after Jones are the same coming after Musk. Now I do want to look a little bit into the sound investigations because it was very very Project Veritas esque.
So let's go ahead and we'll take a look at them in just a minute. But this is from Sound Investigations. If you go to Twitter it's Sound I N V E S T I G is their handle. So. Sound investig. Says breaking CIA officer, former FBI boss, uh, boss can put anyone in jail. Set them up. We call it a nudge. FBI did what we wanted with Alex Jones.
He took his money away, chopped his legs off. Estimates 20 undercover FBI agents at January 6th, works with some of them now at the CIA. Whoa. Let's watch this video.
You can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do. How? You set them up. Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot? Yeah. We get really close. We call it a nudge. A nudge. A nudge. Mmm. Sometimes you just gotta give them a quick little, just to see what happens. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow.
Nothing. Sometimes you just gotta give them a quick little Just to see what happens. We're putting up a fake social media thing to like really get people mad. Alex Jones? Yeah, so, we were after him. You are? He did what we wanted. Which was what? Took his money away. Chop his legs off. Took his money away, chopped his legs, is a contracting officer at the CIAO.
Lennis. Worked for the FBI in 2021 and 2022 in the San Diego office. Moved on to Homeland Security where he conducted asylum interviews at the southern border and now works for the CIA managing multimillion dollar contracts across government agencies and private. I work for, um, I work like this, um, I'm not supposed to tell people any job.
If I say intelligence, what do you think? CIA? Yep. Oh, you work for the CIA? I do. That's incredible. That is the worst CIA officer ever. So I work in a field where you're like, not really supposed to tell people what to, what you do. But when I say intelligence, you say central intelligence. agency? Yeah. Wow, you're a tough cookie to crack.
That is the nation's best my friend. Let's listen to that one more time because that was amazing. Sector Vendors. I work for, um, I work at this, um, I'm not supposed to tell people. You're not supposed to tell intelligence. What do you think? CIA? Yep. You work for the CIA? That's me. I do work for the contracting officer.
So I deal a lot with, like, different agencies. We're contracting with, like, uh, Directorate of National Intelligence to do stuff. We do Navy, Army, many of them, really. I just, FBI, I used to work for the FBI, so. We went through the FBI, Abby. They're like, here, you used to work there. Oh, I'm permanent. I'm staff.
I'm good. Well, why do they call it contracting? Because I do the contracting for them. I do all the legal contracts. I fly out to vendors and evaluate them. I love the agency. I like the Bureau too. The Bureau was a lot of fun. I got to do a lot of cool stuff at the Bureau. I was the guy in the back of the truck in the van.
Oblenus spoke to an Undercover Sound Investigations reporter about his work experience involving near entrapment and his employers involvement with political commentator Alex Jones legal battles. As long as the Bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put pro lifers in jail whenever they want.
Yeah. You think that's on the agenda? We can, we can You can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do. How? You set them up.
You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse. And once they act on that impulse, then we call that entrapment. It's a fine line. Does the Bureau practice entrapment a lot? We get really close. Not officially? No. We get as close as we can. We get as close as we can to it without doing it.
So they can entrap some of these pro lifers into doing things that they don't care about. Japan gang, yeah. We call it a nudge. A nudge. We call it a nudge. Mmm. Sometimes you just gotta get a quick little, just to see what happens, right? And how does that happen? You put a post out there, or you have someone fake it.
Profile, say something that triggers, that we know is going to trigger one, right? Like, we, we already know your history. If we're to that point, we already know everything about you. So we're like, oh, this'll piss them off. Oh. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow, right? Like a railing.
Like a, oh. So when a railing happens, then sometimes the bureau behind it Yeah, sometimes.
So that's interesting. So he's saying essentially that they would put out social media posts to try to get certain individuals to bite on it. I'm not sure how you could put somebody in jail for a reaction to a social media post. Not sure what he would be alluding to there, but the fact that a CIA intelligence contracting officer just stated basically publicly and without any friction that the CIA conducts nudges or entrapment campaigns around people they disagree with the ideologies of That's pretty concerning Make an influence that you're influencer that you're after you like a I don't know like um I don't even know these names.
Like a Fox News person, or like a Tucker Carlson, or like a Uh, oh, I'm sure he's Right. The youngest one's I think that's the loudest. Like that, what was his name? The one that said, uh, the, uh, San Diego didn't happen. Alex Jones. Yeah, so, we were after him. You are? Are you still after him? Yeah. Why? Because he's broke.
He got found guilty. And had to pay like a hundred million dollars. So what, why were you after him? We're not anymore. Just to get the money for them? Yeah. Was that court case used? Was that a CIA case? Sure it was. That was an agency thing? Well, actually it was a defamation case. So it's a civil, not government.
But we were looking at all of his followers, commenting, following, like, who's that gonna make us take the break? So, even though it's technically not our, well, not the agency, definitely, but the Bureau, for instance. Yeah, that's not our purview. It's a civil, it's a civil matter. But, since they got all this access to his stuff, and it's there, what can we go find?
And did you find anything? I can't tell you. Oh, God. But, so, you know, it's just kind of like, you know, Realize the opportunity that you have so with Alex Jones So he's essentially saying that during the civil case. They got access to all of his documentation over the Sandy Hook allegations And I'm sure you can't point to one thing Alex Jones said that pissed off the CIA It was probably a lot of things but within that list of things was obviously that the ability to find the silliest things potential civil legal case to completely bankrupt a man who was just doing his job in trying to expose potential corruption and mass weaponization of proven tactics that have been absolutely leveraged and at least proposed to be leveraged, right?
If you go back to Operation Northwoods with the CIA, they proposed and it went all the way up to the president. To conduct fake mass shootings, one literally on a military base. And they were actually going to pay people to conduct it. Right? So not faking a mass shooting, that's far more difficult than actually doing the mass shooting.
Right? When you looked at the situation in Russia, what happened? They found people who were broke. Right? Maybe this was, maybe it wasn't the CIA. But maybe it was the CIA. Mm hmm. Who has a track record of potentially finding people who are in a position that they can then bribe to do an act that would be in line with what they would want to see happen to cause something that they want to cause.
And then they find them on telegram and then they convince them to do the thing through words and money and enablement, right? Just a little nudge, just a nudge, right? So in the case of Sandy Hook, right? The dumbest thing they could have done, the dumbest thing anybody could have done, was try to fake it like a movie, right?
That's just, there's so many loose ends. It's far easier to convince somebody who's already on a bunch of psychological medications, who's already, you know, maybe having some sort of mental breakdown, who's already talking about it on forums to just Yeah, what if this did happen? What if this showed up at your house tomorrow?
What if I gave you plans to conduct that, right? Like, there's a lot of ways to do it without creating a Hollywood movie scene, right? This isn't the moon landing. Right? So this man is literally admitting here that what they did was they weaponized the government. Right? Weaponize the CIA. Weaponize the FBI.
Weaponize the judicial system in order to gain insight, dirt, and knowledge. And then go after Alex Jones, cut him off at the legs, which means the judge who conducted it, the prosecutors, all of that should be appealed at this point with this new evidence. You were watching him long before anything ended up happening?
Probably. It wasn't my office, but I mean, we would have been well aware of what he was doing. And the goal with him was what? Just to bankrupt him? Oh, pretty much. And we let the families do it. What? We let the families do it. Were they encouraged to do that by the Bureau? Like nudged? We don't encourage people, but like, we just say, there's no federal statute being broken.
But you do have the option for a civil, for a civil case. And it's a pretty good case. In our opinion. So, oh, that makes so much sense. I have a cousin who's a lawyer. So that's a lot of these cases, they're kind of encouraged by the FBI? Yeah, like, there's nothing federally, federal law we can Interesting.
Let's see. Just gonna kind of scrub through here so I'm not making you listen to this loud background restaurant. But, let's see if there's anything better. Oh, here we go. January 6th, then we'll move on. Alright, here we go.
Maybe it won't. It essentially says, how many people do you think the FBI or the CIA had in the crowd? And he said, I'm talking, they maybe had 20, 20. You needed a thousand to get rid of that crowd. That's where we're stuck on here. So there you go. That's the situation. Now, Alex Jones responds to this on Louder with Crowder.
Discusses this at length in an interview. Let's see if we at that. Lemme ask if you have a lawsuit planned yourself. Um, yes. Can you explain that to people so they understand what it is that you're Yes. And, and Steven, I apologize for going on and on, but, but I can just, just lemme just finish that last go.
I'll get into that. My point is justice depart. IRS, uh, law firms, uh, rig courts, who are not allowed to defend yourself. This is the cocktail they've used against Trump. It's the cocktail that they're now using against everybody. And absolutely, the only reason I want to sue them is to get my name back. I don't even want money, but I want to be able to call Oblevis in.
I want to be able to call their other lawyers in. I want to be able to call in the PR firms because the mistake they made was run their mouth. I mean, the lawyers in Connecticut and Texas. And by the way, the Texas Crips, the same ones suing Elon Musk, by the way, they got up at the courthouse steps when they won their cases, the judge had already found me guilty and then told the jury to find me guilty for a bunch of money.
They said, our mission is to silence him. We don't want money. And that's now happening in the bankruptcy court where the judge is like, wait, the law says you can get money. But the law doesn't say you get to silence people. And so basically there's now findings about to be made public that they're dealing in bad faith.
So that's an inside baseball. But, but yes, I've talked to several different civil rights law firms and I've had four conversations with four law firms, uh, since this just broke, uh, uh, I was talking to him before it broke. So in the last week, they just broke a day and a half ago. It seems like a million years ago now.
And so it's a big deal. You know, it's all God. Yeah. You're opening up the mouths of these evil people to then expose themselves. The Bible says the pit they dig for you is the pit they will fall into. And so absolutely. I don't like taking on the FBI and the CIA, but if somebody's on top of you breaking your nose and punching your eyeballs out and gang raping you and running over you and backing over you, All you can do is fight back.
That's why when I saw the targeting of you a few years ago, I called you. We're already friends then. And I said, listen, don't let it get to you because you're successful. You're one of the top talk shows. You're a populist. People love you. Do not, I know you're smart, but you haven't been through a lot of this yet.
You've been through some stuff. I said, I know the cut of this jib. I know the signature. This is 100 percent the Justice Department, the CIA. They create the narrative. They look at things. They go, we'll take this and we'll take that and we'll make Alex Jones the guy that bullies kids and pees on graves.
Exactly. And then we'll make Steven Crowder this guy that, you know, literally, uh, breaks women's necks and human sacrifices them and it's just all made up and then they just hype it and hype it to, to, to, to, to, to take what you're known for being smart and being funny. Alright, so there you go. That's his response.
He's essentially going to go after the FBI and the CIA for conducting this, uh, this nudge operation, right? Uh, now, again, I think that was pretty good work. Like, I think that's some of the better investigative journalism that's come out more recently, even above what OMG is doing. Uh, what I've seen more recently from James O'Keefe, which is, you know, OMG media project Veritas is essentially dead in the water.
I haven't seen a single project Veritas thing come out, uh, in probably a year since they got rid of him. Uh, but let's look, I just want to look at their, the sound investigations, Twitter account. Hopefully they're only 23, 000 followers. Uh, investigating corruption in adult industries and more. Hmm. Wow. And since they posted that, that has 6 million views on Twitter.
Hmm. Very interesting. Uh, And look, they have more posts. They posted about the Pornhub, C Suite, Executive, uh, Uh, Very interesting. Okay, cool. Sound investigations. Good job. Good on, good on James O'Keefe for encouraging people to start doing this, right? That's real journalism. Absolutely incredible. Okay, let's touch on this.
But before we do that, I just want to remind you that you're still here, still here listening to me. And if you haven't left a five star review, I'm watching you. Not really. Not like the CIA, but I am I am I do feel your presence right now And if you haven't done it yet, I know you want to just do it Just tippity tap that button and I also know you want to head over to Ronan Ronan basics calm and check out the website It's still a little bit of a work in progress.
Most of the things are still on backorder But at least you'll be familiar, roninbasics. com, and I'll let you in on a little clue, something I'm pretty excited about, is that every single one of my order, every single one of the products that I sell will come with it in some way, shape, or form, a QR code.
And on that QR code, it can lead you to become a Ronin affiliate, where you can make any a percentage of every person that you help protect themselves from modern technology. So just by buying one of my products, you'll get a QR code that will be sent to you and you will make a percentage of every single sale.
That has ever made by anybody you encouraged to do so. So you can even make some money. Think about that high quality products, protect yourself from EMF radiation, get rid of corporate and government tracking. How could this get better? You ask? Well, what if you have made money off of it? What if you did that?
That'd be pretty cool, huh? So, RonanBasics. com, and this will start, again, the thing that I will have go live, that will no longer be on backorder, or presale, is going to be the wallets. Alright? Um, pretty awesome designs. They look super sharp, very high quality materials, RonanBasics. com. Check out the wallets that are there and make your order today.
And I can start shipping it out as early as late next week. And I will include with that a QR code for you to share the love with all of your friends and family. All right. RonanBasics. com head there right now. U. S. company hoping to bring back dead extinct animals. This article says U. S. company hoping to bring back the dodo and the mammoth.
But here's why it won't be like Jurassic Park. I like how they're already going on a PR campaign. But here's why it's not going to turn into velociraptors tearing you and your children to shreds. Here's why. Let me explain. My name is James Robinson, news reporter for SkyNews. com. Let me tell you why this is a great thing for humanity.
That we're going to bring back woolly mammoths. And also saber toothed tigers. And also maybe Velociraptors. Let me, let me, give me five minutes of your time and I shall convince you, sir, that bringing back extinct animals that the world no longer was able to, to need or was able to sustain at sizes much larger than animals that we have today, in an environment that is constantly surrounded by humans that are not like they were before, let me tell you why introducing Extinct animals back into the ecosystem is a great thing.
Okay, I'm listening, James. Tell me. Well, the idea of scientists bringing prehistoric creatures back to life with some clever DNA trickery might sound familiar to fans of the 1993 Hollywood blockbuster Jurassic Park. Yes, it does. But for Colossal Biosciences, a company that hopes to reintroduce extinct species such as the Dodo and the Mammoth, I like how they find like the most cuddly little stupid things that they could come up with, right?
We're not gonna do those big scary animals, right? We're not gonna weaponize Tyrannosaurus Rex's, right? We're just just a little Dodo. They're stupid and harmless. That's all. Maybe a little woolly mammoth So you can give it a little belly rub But not velociraptors. We would never do that. We would never.
We would never. That's a terrible idea. We would never do that, guys. We would never start an island for rich people to go hunt velociraptors. To pay us millions of dollars to go start our own Jurassic Park Island, where you could view Velociraptors, T Rexes, Bronchiosauruses, Triceratops, and, and all of your childhood dreams come true.
We would never do that and monetize it for our benefit. Just dodo's. And little belly rubs for the woolly mammoths. That's all we want to do, guys. Don't worry about us. Just dodos. They were stupid to begin with. We'll start there. But for, uh, it, it says it is more than just a film script. It's a reality, and one that could be just years away.
We've got all the technology we need, says Ben Lamb, chief executive of the firm. Based in Dallas, Texas. It's just a focus of time and funding. And we are 100 percent confident we can bring back the Tasmanian Tiger, the Dodo, the Mammoth. The science behind the project is simple. Work out the genes that make an extinct animal what it is, and then replicate those genes using the DNA of a close existing relative.
Right? We're not God. We're just creating animals out of thin air. With our bare hands. Creating life. The very existence that maybe, just maybe, we may alter a thing or two there. Maybe make a purple woolly mammoth, because people love purple. Right? But we would never. Not the big scary stuff, guys. Don't worry about it.
It's almost reverse Jurassic Park, says Mr. Lamb. Right? In the film, they were film filling in the holes in the dinosaur DNA with frog DNA. We are leveraging artificial intelligence and tools to identify the core genes that make a mammoth a mammoth and then engineering them into elephant genomes. Right?
We're not, we're not filling in the DNA with frog DNA. That's um, such a huge part of this and all of the concerns have to do with the frog DNA. So we're not going to do that. Wow. Uh, that is the technical part, but there are some other practical hurdles for Colossal to overcome. Namely, once you have a mammoth cells, do you birth a real life mammoth?
The answer, according to Colossal, is in the womb of an Asian elephant. Hmm. But it is a process that could take nearly two years, even after they've worked out how to do it. Each of the different projects have different challenges. The mammoth is really around gestation, which is around 22 months. The dodo gestations, it's pretty great.
They said we are using surrogate chickens. The hardest part is cultivating the primordial germ cells. So after about 4, 000 years. When could we see the return of the Mighty Mammoth, a creature that fell victim to human hunting? This is our fault, guys. Let's bring him back. And the changing conditions brought about by the end of the last Ice Age.
We are well into the editing phase, said Mr. Lamb. We don't have mammoths yet, but we still feel very good. About 2028. Geez. Away from the lab, led by Rona Hisoli, Colossal's head of biological sciences, there are a few issues to overcome, including where the newly returned species will live once they're born.
Mr. Lamb said Who gives Who the fuck gives you the right? Mr. Lamb who gave you who gave you the right to do this? How do you how do you say? Oh, I'm gonna be the guy to challenge nature to say hey I know this happened in the past in history, but guess what? Not on my watch, my name's Mr. Lamb. I'm gonna reverse engineer the cells and become God, and start to create animals that haven't been around for thousands of years.
Without any regard to how this will affect our ecosystem, without any regard to what the actual predatory aspects of this might look like, without any concern for anything other than, this shit looks pretty cool, maybe I'll do that. How is there not, and also by the way, what stops them from doing this with Neanderthals?
There's a weird situation. Oh, no, all you need is a surrogate mom and we have Neanderthals back Isn't there like little people too? Like we I remember I went to the museum. I think it was in San Diego Some some museum that I was at and they had a literal like little person dwarf That was another homo sapien esque type of figure What's to stop them from doing this.
With that, are we gonna bring back Neanderthals and dwarf homo, you know, homo sapien esque creatures, and just see how that works out for us. I could just see, let's go. Let's go into a new scenario. We went from battle bots to Neanderthals being regenerated into life. Maybe. Maybe let's cross them both together.
The battle bots. And the only way to, to combat that is to bring back to life the strong, the, the eyebrow having Neanderthals, right? We were the reason they're gone anyways. Just bring them back. We'll see. Well, they're going to back us up. Right? If, if all hell breaks loose with the AI robots, let's just keep further experiment with us being God, you know, discount the metal God that we're creating.
And let's just say, Hey, we're going to bring back the enderthals to fight off the AI robot battle bots. Maybe that's the end result. Right? But literally, do you think they're going to stop a mammoths? Do you think they're going to stop at Dodo's or whatever they said, whatever the other one was. No, they're going to do everything and anything they can, which includes.
Includes dinosaurs includes other, uh, Homo sapien ask creatures like the Neanderthals, right? That is going to happen if we are going down this road. We are opening up Pandora's box. Where these scientists are acting as if they're gods, where they believe they can do whatever they want without repercussions, without government oversight, because they're moving fast enough now to where we can't as humans be able to take in the information and what they're doing and have corrective measures and, and guidelines for them to follow, which says, Hey, maybe it's not a good idea to re introduce predatory species into our current state ecosystem that haven't been around for thousands of years.
Maybe that's not a good idea. Maybe it's not a good idea to create a hyper intelligent Metal figure that could break every bone in your body and has no emotions. Maybe not, you know Where do we start to put where do we start to draw the line, right? If it's not hyper intelligent godlike metal creatures, and it's not bringing back extinct creatures and developing Animals from scratch and changing their genetic makeups with with the metal God filling in the blanks Right?
Like, there's so many sci fi books that I could create out of this, it's ridiculous. And most of them, if not all of them, end terribly for us. Right? We better hope the aliens show up and save our asses from these dumbass scientists trying to extinct humanity while bringing back dodo's and creating metal gods like AI.
Battle bots. Jeez. Our ultimate goal is to put all the animals we make back into the wild. He says new tools in the fight to protect nature. Colossal thinks the work is not just about rewilding animals previously lost to the world. The company is currently working with Dr. Paul Ling at Baylor college of medicine to create a vaccine to eradicate the deadly.
E E H V virus, which kills about 20 percent of baby elephants. It is also working closely with the university of Alaska and the university of Stockholm on radiocarbon dating of American mammoths, as well as sequencing their genome, the largest study of its type ever undertaken. Now what's interesting about this is that guess what they're getting to help convince you in their propaganda campaign, that this is a good thing.
They hired the guy. There's a very famous documentarian named Teton. Not named Teaton Ridge, but James Reed, you've probably heard that name before and if you hadn't go look up his IMDB and you'll probably be pretty familiar with it. You know the Documentary that was very very famous region recently The my octopus teacher is now been commissioned to create a docu series about this medical technology company The new Jurassic Park says the company has teamed up with Oscar winning my octopus teacher James Reed's underdog films and Teton Ridge Entertainment to produce a multi year docu series about Colossal's work.
The firm bills itself as the world's first de extinction company has raised some 225 million dollars in funding as it works to resurrect species like the woolly mammoth and the dodo. The announcement of the docu series comes on the heels of Colossal hiring former legendary Entertainment executive Emily Castell as chief marketing officer.
Among other duties, Castell will help guide the company on its foray into the entertainment world. Teton Ridge Entertainment will finance the first phase of production with the intent of finding a distribution. Coming to a Netflix near you! The real Jurassic park. I like how every time they mentioned this, they also mentioned dodo's and woolly mammoths.
Like they, I guarantee you that marketing executive CMO probably did a huge survey market analysis where they tried to figure out what are the least intimidating things that we could run our campaign on to not immediately sound the public alarms around us playing God, and that just so happens to be the woolly mammoth and the dodo.
Right? Transparency is core to Colossal's missions and goals. Of course it is. So working with the right filmmakers to chronicle our journey was incredibly important. Right? So this is just a big propaganda campaign. Huge money budget, big propaganda campaign to convince you that this is a good idea and we shouldn't be sounding the alarms over this.
Okay,
now, the last topic that we're going to discuss today is going to be that the Everybody was talking about this week about the solar eclipse, right? There was all these conspiracy theories about the solar eclipse, right? It's going to be the end of times. It's going to cause all these earthquakes that the, all of the technology is going to go out.
It's there's going to be this, there's going to be that there was all these conspiracy theories. And I didn't come out and say much about it at all. One, because I was too busy, busy building Ronan and have my head buried in the sand to sit and create content about it. Yeah. But two, I didn't really see the correlation, right?
I know there's a huge buildup and it's in the air. Something's going to happen very shortly, very soon. I don't disagree with you. Uh, and side note, I listened to a podcast between Theo on Theo Vaughn's podcast, uh, this past weekend where he interviewed Tucker Carlson, probably one of my favorite podcasts I've listened to in a very, very long time.
And Tucker Carlson sounds the alarm. It's the third time I've said that in like three paragraphs. It really does. Sound the alarm bells around the potential for mass EMPs causing mass chaos by an external enemy. And there's some really sobering thoughts and ideas around, get a plan in place, because when all hell breaks loose and you can't call your mom, you can't call your dad, you can't get a hold of your kids, you can't get a hold of your brother, your sister, your mother, your best friend, what are you gonna do?
Do you have a plan in place? Do you have a place to meet up? Do you know where to source your water from? Do you know how to get out of the city properly? Do you know where to go hide in the woods? Do you know those things? Because if you don't, and I certainly need to put together this plan as well, but you should have a plan.
You should have some food storage. You should have a way to filter your water. You should have some of those things, right? Go listen to that podcast. Really, really well done. But anyways, uh, all of these conspiracy theories around what's going to happen after the eclipse. Now. Being somewhat interested in astronomy and and the cosmos and everything that's going on in the larger universe around us This eclipse is pretty cool to me I like looking up in and seeing that and and kind of being able to feel extremely small in this mathematical equation that is reality going on around us and I appreciate being able to witness that and I think it's pretty damn cool People that shit on the Eclipse are the same people that shit on New Year's resolutions.
Like, you're just, you're just lame. So, I wrote off all these conspiracy theories. And, I didn't find any of them interesting. I didn't see any one of them that convinced me there was going to be something that went down. But what I did see, after the fact, excuse me, is this article. And I saw a video about it, that was pretty well done.
And it explains how the Eclipse could have potentially been artificially created. And that sounds crazy. But let me tell you how this article comes from the European Space Agency, and it says face to face with sun eclipsing proba three, there is a satellite technology rotating around the earth right now that has the capability to cause a pseudo solar eclipse.
This is real technology. It's online. Look it up, the article is face to face with sun eclipsing Proba 3. And here's what it says. It says,
through exquisite millimeter scale formation flying the dual satellite making up ESA's Proba 3 will accomplish what was previously a space mission impossible. Cast a precisely held shadow from one platform to the other in the process of blocking out the fiery sun to observe its ghostly surrounding atmosphere Now this should be fairly easy and simplistic to go back and see if prior to this thing being created was there a projected solar eclipse.
It's just a mathematical equation, right? I'm sure somebody way smarter than me knows how to calculate it. But this should be able to be validated. I haven't done that math myself because it would take me 20 years of learning math and you know, maybe getting Neuralink in the, in the process to help me understand it.
But there's probably a way to validate this. So I just haven't gotten that far, but there are some interesting names for these things. One of them is called the Occulter Spacecraft because there's two satellites that make this up. And it says, ahead of the Proba pair launching together later this year, the scientists who will make use of Proba 3 observations were able to see the satellites with their own eyes.
Members of this team will test hardware developed for the mission during an actual terrestrial solar eclipse over North America. Next. April dun dun dun. The two satellites are currently undergoing final integration in the premises of RedWire near Antwerp in Belgium. They are paid a visit by Proba3 science working team, a 45 strong group of solar physicists coming from all over Europe and the wider world.
Many of these experts are regular visitors to terrestrial solar eclipse around the globe, but looking forward to the new perspective Proba3 will open up on the faint solar corona. This mysterious region is important as the place where coronal mass ejections are created, vast eruptions of charged particles that trigger solar storms, as well as influencing the velocity of the solar wind, which is central to determining space weather.
The satellite hardware was quite something to in close up, or in close up. I was particularly struck by how close the camera had on the coronagraph spacecraft is to the solar array. So those are the two names of it. Coronagraph? And the other satellite's name is Occulter. While the array relies on high solar illumination, the camera has to remain in complete darkness with no stray light whatsoever.
It really brings it home how precisely that small shadow cast by the Occulter will need to be maintained in place. We also got to peek at the carefully machined edge of the Occulter spacecraft's disk, normally kept under protective cover before launch. Interesting. Now this is pretty long. Let's see if we can find out and explain how it goes.
Exactly does what it's supposed to do.
So it says there are telescopes that incorporate internal occulting discs to obscure the solar disc. The problem is that these internal occulters still experienced light spilling around their edges known as diffraction, blotting out the extremely faint signals of interest, right? So it looks like one, uh, one satellite in front of the other, both positioning itself in front of the sun and creating this.
Pseudo eclipse, right? An artificial eclipse, it says. It says Damian Galeno, ESA's Proba 3 project manager, notes the best way to reduce diffraction, uh, is to increase the distance between the occulter and the chronograph, which is precisely what Proba 3 is going to do. Interesting. By definition, full scale end to end testing of PROBA3 is impossible here on Earth, but the meeting here heard how the same set of filter wheels developed by PROBA3 will be used to observe the solar eclipse over North America on the 8th of April 2024 along the Liquid Parallel Crystal Imaging Technology.
The filter wheels allow observation of the corona in different polarization angles, like switching between different polarized glasses. Uh, the nice about observing during an actual eclipse is we won't need any occulter to gain insight of exactly the kind of results we are going to get back from Proba 3.
Now why would they want to do this? Right, why would they want to cause proba 3? A solar eclipse. It says, uh, Assuming the sun's output influences Earth's climate, it's important to measure any variations we precisely can. Probe 3 is due for launch this autumn. Like, what's the purpose of this? Why are you doing that?
Why do you want to? And here's a actual good, uh, Explanation as to what it's doing and how it's doing it and so you can go check that out Look up the article name, but the
last thing I'll show you is a video here This is a two and a half three minute video that explains hopefully verbally what's going on If it doesn't I'll read you what it's saying
Says proba mission for precise formation flying demonstration and sun Proba mission that we're developing for the European Space Agency and we have two main objectives The first one being at the demonstration of formation flying technologies And the second one is to allow for the observation of the inner solar corona.
Robo3 consists of two spacecraft. One of them has a telescope which is pointing towards the sun, and the other carries an occulting disk. What we do with the formation flying is to position the disk in front of the telescope such that the solar disk is occulted from the point of view of the telescope.
And it allows to see exclusively the much fainter solar corona. Besides that, one of the main challenges is the accuracy with which we want to achieve the formation. Positions need to have an accuracy of a couple of millimeters and pointings of a thousandth of a degree. And all of that while both spacecraft are flying at speeds between 1 and 10 kilometers per second.
The last challenge will be the autonomy with which we want to achieve that each spacecraft is an in Basically it sends some instruction for the next seven days and from that point onwards spacecraft will work on their own. This has required the development of some specific technologies to make up all the spacecraft to communicate with each other, synchronize and cooperate, not only under no In GMC and attitude control systems and information flying.
Anyways, we're not going to listen to that whole thing. It's amazing how proud these people are of themselves just randomly doing stuff for no seeming purpose. without any understanding of what the actual implications are of their actions. Seems to be quite the theme with science today is like, everybody's a mad scientist.
And there's these situations, right? The mad scientist, like, trope, essentially, is playing out right before us right now in so many instances, and, you know, between nuclear bombs and AI battle bots and resurrecting extinct species. Gosh. And pseudo artificial solar eclipses. Like again, why would they want to do that?
What's the purpose of that? What's the value of this? Why would you want to do that? It's crazy. It's crazy. But guess what? The world's crazy. And everybody's gone mad. And last but not least, you know, like I said before, make sure you have your, your, I'm not correlating it to this. This is just weird to me.
I'm not sure why they would want to do this. They don't seem to explain why they would want to do this, but they can do it. So when people are saying, oh, it's an artificial solar eclipse, or, oh, it was fake, or, oh, this, oh, that. Yeah, you sound silly. But then you actually find something like this and you're like, Hmm, that's interesting.
If nothing else. It's interesting. All right. That's all I got for you guys. Thank you so much for listening. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart, and I hope you have a wonderful. Thank you. Adams Archive.
-
Welcome to the Adam's Archive, where host Austin Adams brings you on a thrilling ride through today's hottest topics! Brace yourself for a rollercoaster of updates and breaking news as we delve into the Homeland Security raid on P. Diddy's homes and uncover the potential Libertarian party run by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Join us as we navigate the aftermath of a devastating terrorist attack in Russia and peel back the layers of intrigue in the eye-opening Nickelodeon documentary, "Quiet On Set." But that's not all – stay tuned to explore Austin's latest venture with Ronan Faraday Goods. Get ready for an action-packed episode you won't want to miss!
All the links: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
Ronin Pre-Sale: https://subtlegoods.typeform.com/to/RzGDOegb
Substack: https://austinadams.substack.com
----more----
Full Transcription
-
Support my new company Ronin in our Pre-Sale:
Protect Yourself & Your Family from the ever present surveillance state where corporations, governments and predators can track your location instantly, access your private photos in seconds and steal your entire life in the blink of an eye.
Choose Privacy.Protect yourself from the invisible threats of the modern world with faraday products that hide your location and shield your private data from unknown threats.
Choose Safety.Whether you are a mother of 3 children looking to protect your family from the reality of everyday life, or a military operator looking to vanish in a combat zone, we've got you covered.
Choose Health.Shield yourself from the daily barrage of cancer causing EMF's being emitted by your cell phone and 5g technology with our EMF blocking apparel and faraday hats.
Click here to support me in this new venture and if you order all three items I will personally send you a 10% off coupon code that is good for life
----more----
Welcome to "Adams Archive," where the glamour of Hollywood meets its darkest secrets.
Host Austin Adams invites you on a gripping journey behind the velvet curtain, where the sparkle of stardom often hides chilling narratives of intrigue, misconduct, and mystery. In this thought-provoking series, we delve into three compelling stories that have sent shockwaves through the entertainment world and beyond.
Joe Rogan's Murderous Guest: Explore the unsettling revelation of a guest on Joe Rogan's podcast who was later discovered to have a severed head in his freezer. We'll analyze the implications of such associations in media and the responsibilities of platforms hosting controversial figures.
P. Diddy on Trial: Delve into the legal battles surrounding P. Diddy, where allegations beyond the music mogul's glittering career surface. From lawsuits that hint at dark practices akin to Jeffrey Epstein's to whispered tales of a hidden side to Hollywood elite circles, we unravel the complexity of P. Diddy's ongoing legal drama.
Ryan Garcia Exposes Elites: Follow the shocking allegations made by professional boxer Ryan Garcia, as he claims to have witnessed and been a victim of heinous acts by some of the entertainment industry's most powerful figures. Garcia's claims shed light on the purportedly sinister undertakings within elite circles, echoing the fears and concerns about the influence and actions of the rich and famous.
Why Subscribe to "Adams Archive"?
"Adams Archive" isn't just a podcast; it's a mission to uncover truth and foster discussion on topics that are often left in the shadows. Each episode promises meticulously researched content, engaging storytelling, and a commitment to integrity. Austin Adams ensures that no stone is left unturned, providing listeners with an immersive experience that's as enlightening as it is enthralling.
Don't miss an episode of "Adams Archive." Subscribe now on your favorite podcast platform, follow us on YouTube, Substack, and social media to join a community dedicated to uncovering the stories behind the stories. Your support enables us to continue this important work, bringing light to the darkest corners of entertainment and beyond. Thank you for being a part of our journey to seek truth and justice in an often-misunderstood industry.
All the Links:
For easy access to all our content, episodes, and exclusive updates, visit https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams. Here, you'll find everything you need to stay connected with "Adams Archive" and be the first to know about new episodes and special content.
Join us as we peel back the layers of Hollywood's glossy exterior to reveal the truths that lie beneath. "Adams Archive" is more than just a podcast—it's your gateway to the stories that matter.
----more----
Full Transcription
b
Adams Archive. Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we're going to discuss some pretty wild events. Now it's been a few weeks since our last episode and I'd like to formally apologize to you for that.
Life gets in the way. Some new adventures that I have been pursuing simultaneously. So just trying to juggle it all while we go through some changes. Here on the Adams archive as well. So thank you for sticking around. I'm glad you're here today because we're going to discuss some wild shit, and I will even give you the update on everything that I've been working on in the background.
And if you follow me on social media, you might be privy to it already. So we'll discuss that, which is pretty cool. But first, we're going to discuss Joe Rogan having a guest on just one month ago, who has now been found to have had a severed head in his freezer. Thanks So we'll discuss that, obviously.
The next thing we're going to discuss is going to be the bill that may make TikTok unavailable in the United States as it quickly advances in the House. Now, this isn't a new idea. This is something that's been discussed before. This is bills that were presented by Donald Trump prior to this. This is no new conversation, but we'll discuss why it might be interesting in the conversation today.
After that, we're going to have a discussion about some deeper and a little bit darker topics. And as always, the more you stick around, the darker and deeper things generally get. So as we segue from those conversations, we're going to move into a conversation about a few more recent celebrities that are exposing the elites the same way that Jeffrey Epstein did.
Now, in a couple of different manners, one calling it out in a way that is seemingly, I would say positive, you know, positive in the meaning that they are not a part of it, and the other being a part of it. And you may know these names, one being the famous boxer Ryan Garcia, and the other being P.
Diddy. Some pretty crazy stuff going on there, which is Stuff we'll get into. I'll give you a brief synopsis, which is the fact that Ryan Garcia, famous boxer, young, good looking dude, 200 something boxing matches, unbelievable boxer, has had a recent tirade on X where he just goes off about Bohemian Grove, saying that he was tied up by guys in black robes and made to watch some horrific events.
Again, at Bohemian Grove. So. pretty crazy stuff. We'll look at the tweets, we'll look at the videos that he actually talks about these things, and that will move us into a conversation about P Diddy. P Diddy is having a more recent judicial situation where a former producer that he worked with, Lil Rod, seems to be the all time worst rapper name ever.
It almost seems satirical, but I digress. Lil Rod has filed a lawsuit against P. Diddy as well as Universal Records and a bunch of other people in association with what seems to be a honeypot Trap, similar to what Jeffrey Epstein was doing. And they actually named Jeffrey Epstein in the doc documents in the court documents of this 73 page document, which I'll actually walk you through.
I have it. I highlighted that I went through it, did my research for you guys. So I will share all of that with you as well in the show notes today. So you can actually take a look at it. All right, then. That's it. All right. So that will be our discussion for today. Go ahead, hit the subscribe button, leave a five star review.
And before I jump into it, let me tell you what I've been up to. So I have recently launched the pre sale of my new company called Ronin and Ronin is a Faraday goods company. And you might say, what the hell is a Faraday Goods Company? And that's a good question, because I didn't know what it was up until four months ago.
Four months ago, I did a deep dive, and you may have recalled the episode that I did on 5G and EMF radiation. And ever since then, it's just been bothering me. The, the amount of data that we discussed, the amount of harmful effects of these things, and, and also, Simultaneously, while I was doing that, we started to hear more and more about it.
Joe Rogan's been talking about EMF radiation. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been talking about Wi Fi radiation poisoning. 5G's been talked about by people like Andrew Huberman, who's also talked about EMF radiation from your cell phone. So, Faraday products are products that protect you from the EMF radiation that's happening all around you all of the time.
Very likely on the thing that you're listening to right now is also doing this to you, which has, has very harmful effects, including cancer causing blood clots, DNA damage, tons and tons of things like that. And there's only one way to protect yourself. And it's called Faraday products and Faraday products are a specially lined material that Pretty decently difficult to source.
And so you can find apparel, you can find hats to protect your, your, you know, most important asset. There's a lot of different utilizations for these things, but what Ronan will be doing is we'll be offering EMF radiation protection. Apparel and hats, starting with hats. Okay. So we'll be coming out with 10 foil hats, kind of like tinfoil hats, but a little bit better.
And these will be baseball hats and beanies that will protect you from EMF radiation. We'll also be coming out with Faraday backpacks. Now, again, I said, there's a couple of uses for Faraday products. One being apparel and protecting yourself from wifi radiation and EMF radiation from your cell phones and 5g.
The other being that it completely shields all inbound and outbound communication signals. So, one thing that we know about this cell phone that we all have right here is that it's tracking you everywhere that you go. Who's using that information you might ask? Well, corporations, governments, and even just nefarious types of individuals all around the country and the world.
They'll track you, they'll take your data, they'll steal your private photos and videos and leverage them against you, they can steal your credit and debit cards, they can do all sorts of atrocious things, unless you have a Faraday device. Product to put that in. So Ronan will be creating backpacks, Faraday backpacks in which you drop your laptop, your cell phone, your iPad, your wallet, whatever it is, and it completely shields all inbound and outbound signals, making you just basically vanish from all of those tracking technologies that are following you every single place that you go.
Alright, there's a limited time pre sale of these products. I do not have them in my possession. I am ordering them in an initial pre sale order for you guys. And it's only going to be people who follow me on social media and people who buy them. Listen to the podcasts that are available for this presale.
Okay? There's limited spots available. I already did the presale launch on Instagram and a few other social media, so there's a few spots left that I wanted to get out to you guys as well. So I'll include Ronan's presale link in the show notes for you. I've never promoted basically anything on this podcast, and I don't know how many episodes I never ask for you guys to, to, you know.
Support some outside company, but I will ask you to support my company, and I truly believe in the mission that Ronan has, which is going to be to create harmony between the harmful technology and the pace of innovation and technology today, and actually providing you with a healthy lifestyle surrounding those things that we're not just going to get rid of.
Okay, so I do ask you if you are interested in these things, go order the presale. It'll be the first thing in the show notes. Go check it out. Click that link, join the presale launch, and I would appreciate it from the bottom of my heart. All right, that's what I got for you right now. Now, without further ado, let's jump right in.
Into it,
the Adams Archive. All right. The very first topic that we're gonna be discussing today is going to be that Joe Rogan had a guest on his podcast just one month ago, who has now had been found to have a severed head in his freezer, along with a torso in a bla or a blue. bin that he was toting around that there's photo evidence of him Toting this bin around through a door.
So let's go ahead and read this article And let's find out what this is really about now the individual in question here with somebody who is a former, former inmate, and he's, was on the podcast with Josh Dubin, and I've actually loved the podcast with Joe Rogan and Josh Dubin, where essentially what he does, Josh Dubin is a advocate and a lawyer who basically brings on people who are wrongful convictions.
and gets them out of jail and then starts this conversation about wrongful convictions and, and how a large percentage of individuals who are in jail right now could very well be innocent. And so they, his organization does an amazing thing, which they go through all of the, the different cases that they're sent.
They do some deep dives into the information that are there, and then they help get these people out, which is an amazing thing. I love the work that Josh Dubin does, but. Maybe in this instance, they should have left this guy in jail. Okay. So Sheldon Johnson, a former Joe Rogan show guest is a 48 year old youth counselor for the Queens defenders who spent 25 years in prison for attempted murder and robbery.
And he was introduced on the Joe Rogan experience in February by his friend, Perlmutter Center from Legal Justice executive director, Josh Dubin. And he was saying that he was a marvelous human being who was wronged by the system. Johnson was also photographed shaking hands with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
However, less than a year after his release from prison, Johnson was arrested in New York on Thursday after police found a severed head in his apartment freezer and a torso stashed in a bin. The victim, identified as 44 year old Colin Small, spent time in the same prison as Johnson and may have had a beef with him, according to the New York Post.
Small was reportedly heard by neighbors pleading for his life on Tuesday evening before several gunshots rang out. In security footage following the incident, Johnson could be seen carrying cleaning supplies in a blue bin to the apartment where Small's remains were found, before leaving in a blonde wig.
Great disguise. Rogan received criticism from viewers when the episode with Johnson aired with critics accusing Rogan and Dubin of downplaying Johnson's violent criminal history. Very interesting Now, I'm pretty sure I've listened to this episode I know I've listened to several episodes with Josh Dubin and again really like the work that he's done I'm not sure if this is the individual that I'm thinking of that I listened to last But I'll definitely go back and listen to this one because this is a wild situation, right?
It's like Even if this guy wasn't guilty and maybe this is the argument that could be made around this is that jail prison time Makes you a terrible person it can find you it turns you into an animal All you are is surrounded by people who are violent criminals who are absolutely the the And even, and this isn't to detract from the fact that there are wrongful convictions, and that the for profit prison system is the absolute worst thing in the world, that causes hundreds of thousands, if not millions of families a year to be in agony, agony, for no good reason.
I've stated my positions on the justice system before, as somebody who was, you know, planning on going into the justice system and becoming a lawyer, criminal defense lawyer, my take on the entirety of this. And the reason I wanted to go be a criminal defense lawyer is because I don't believe in the justice system in the way that it stands today.
I believe there's so many wrongful convictions. And I feel like even the ones that are convicted, are generally convicted for profitable corporations, and not because it's a true way to help them better themselves and their lives and be a better person for themselves. In society. I don't think that happens.
I think there's a very, very marginal percentage of people that come out of jail as a better person or come out of prison as a better person as when they went in there. I just don't think it happens. There's no system, there's no processes in place that cause that to be the case. There's no reform that's happening.
It's a place to essentially imprison people, to throw them in a jail cell and allow them to be a number that corporations can profit off of. And so, to me In this situation, let's go back to the original discussion being had here, which is that in this situation, even if he wasn't guilty here, even if he wasn't an attempted murderer, as he was convicted for prior to him getting out for a wrongful conviction, they very well, in prison, could have made him this way, just shown by the fact that the person that he went after and murdered was actually somebody that went to jail with him, went to prison with him.
And so, that to me, it shows that like, It didn't help, did it? Even if he, and let's just say he wasn't the person who committed that initial crime, it made him the type of person that they made him out to be to begin with. Even if he wasn't. And he probably was, now that we know he's this type of, he's got this in him.
That's some gangster shit, but for sure, for sure, Seems like he did this one. I don't think he's getting out of this one at all. All right. So a pretty wild situation. I wonder what this I wonder what Joe Rogan's response will be to this because that's a not a good look for Josh Dubin. I wonder what Josh Dubin's response to this as I wonder if he's come out and had some some conversations because Joe Rogan as there's very few guests that Joe Rogan has said or had on consistently.
Joe Rogan has Josh Dubin on his podcast at least once a quarter. And he says that he does that because he believes in the cause. He says that he does that because he believes that there is a injustice happening in our justice system. Absolutely is. And I agree with him 100%. This isn't a good look though.
There's probably, there's probably I don't know, a hundred situations that could have been bad that couldn't have been this bad of a look for them. So anyways, wild situation. I'm sure there's going to be more information that comes out in this. There was some photos that leaked that showed this, Interesting stuff.
So I didn't go and find any clips. I doubt there's going to be anything that like alludes to this or is even interesting compared to this. But, I would say you should still go check out Josh Dubin's situation and his organization that he leads there. Because they still do good stuff despite, I don't know, getting a man out of prison who severed another man's head.
Not a good look. Anyways, all right. So the next thing that we're going to discuss here is going to be that there is a new bill looking to ban tick tock and, and it says the measure gained the support of house speaker, Mike Johnson on Thursday and could soon come up for a full vote in the house. I don't know why I said vote like that vote.
Podcast when this happened. A couple years ago, and I'll tell you my position on this. I haven't read really much into this. We'll read it together and we'll, we'll kind of have a real reaction for you here. Cause I don't know the context of this bill or why they're trying to pass it personally. I do know that the last time it was because there's like military and, and espionage happening in there and situations where they're tracking our military members and leveraging the data against them.
And, and they believe that it's a security issue with our own civilians, that they're gathering all this data and they're, they're infiltrating our youth and putting in all of these themes of like terrible societal constructs that are, are degrading our society as a whole. I don't disagree with any of those, but I also don't think that tick tocks the only one doing that and I also think that if our government is going out of their way to pass a bill because they're concerned about the security measures and the spying and the, the, the utilization of data weaponization of data, right?
So if our government's concerned about China weaponizing tick tocks data against our citizens and surveilling us. utilizing that technology. What I should be far more concerned about and what you should be far more concerned about is the fact that our government uses every social media platform to do the very same thing.
They just don't like it when other people do it to us too. It's like, if they're concerned about other other governments weaponizing social media against our citizens, it's because they're already doing it. It's because they know what they can do with that. Information and we already know that they're connected, right?
We already know the information came out about the FBI connections with Facebook Instagram Surrounding the election. We already know that they essentially had the the twitter files and stuff you know after the twitter files were released that they were working with all of the three letter agencies and the government organizations and the White house and they all had a basically a secret email thread where they were telling people a specific post to take down and I'm sure several of mine were one of them Absolutely, because the second I posted a video about Hunter Biden and the whole situation, I think I pulled it from InfoWars, and I reposted it on my Instagram, I was vanished, gone.
So shadowbanned for I think about seven or eight months. It really like crushed my momentum. With the podcast with the Instagram with everything very disheartening it hurt my feelings a bit But I bet say about eight months you couldn't search my account. You couldn't find any of my videos there would get no view It was terrible.
I had like 30 something thousand followers at the time. It wasn't like I did nobody followed me. It was pretty wild But anyways, let's go ahead and read this bill. That's my take on it is essentially if they're concerned about it Somebody else doing it to us. It's because they already know and are doing it ten times worse than what they're doing it They're thinking China's doing it to us for right.
Anyways, a bill that could lead to the popular video sharing app. TikTok being unavailable in the United States is quickly gaining traction in the house as lawmakers voiced their concerns about the potential for the platform to surveil and manipulate Americans. Could you imagine a government surveilling and manipulating American citizens with social media platforms?
No way. Say it ain't so. We better get that TikTok out of here. Because there's no way our American social media platforms do that to us. It's only those Chinese communists over there that that surveil and manipulate Americans with social media. The measure gained support of House Speaker Mike Johnson and could soon come up for a full vote in the House.
The bill advanced out of committee Thursday and unanimous bipartisan vote 50 to nothing. Wow. I find a another bill that's passed like that in a while. The White House has provided technical support in the drafting of the bill. The White House Press Secretary Kain Jean Pierre said that TikTok legislation still needs some work to get to a place where the President, Joe Biden will endorse it.
Yeah, because you know, if you go read that bill right now, it's probably like, yeah, we'll ban TikTok and we'll also allow another 3 million immigrants to come into our country and also vote. The bill takes a two pronged approach. First, it would require ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, to divest TikTok and other applications it controls within 180 days of enactment of the bill.
Or those applications will be prohibited in the United States. Second, it creates a narrow process to let the executive branch prohibit access to an app owned by a foreign adversary if it possesses a threat to national security. It's an important bipartisan measure to take on China, our largest geo geopolitical foe, which is actively undermining our economy and security.
I think we're actively undermining our economy and our security. Just as much as China is. Our critics also claim the app could be used to spread misinformation beneficial to Beijing. Former President Donald Trump attempted to ban TikTok through executive order, but the courts blocked the action after TikTok sued, arguing that actions would violate free speech and due process rights.
Hmm. So interesting that all these things that Donald Trump tried to do four years ago Biden's trying to do now, build a wall. Don't do that. Well, now Biden's saying that we should build a wall. Ban TikTok. No, don't do that. Oh, well, now Biden's trying to ban TikTok. It's like everything that Trump foresaw and tried to attempt to do.
That was, Like defaced and demeaned by the Democrats is now being enacted as if it was their own idea. Just like how in the State of the Union Address, Joe Biden was sitting there acting like he wanted immigrants to not immigrate. Jump over our border. Like basically saying we're, we're going to protect our border.
Like, Oh really? Cause you were the very person that allowed this to happen over the last two years. And now that we're coming up on an election and we have essentially the same amount of illegal immigrants that have entered our country as the total population of 33 States. That's how many immigrants that we have in our country today is the, They total up to the same amount of population that we have had over our borders in the last, since Joe Biden started in office, 33 states worth of populations of individuals that are now in our country, undocumented, illegal aliens.
Hmm. Critics also claim that the app could be used to spread misinformation beneficial to Beijing. TikTok raised similar concerns about the legislation gaining momentum in the house. This bill is an outright ban of TikTok, no matter how much the authors try to disguise it. This legislation will trample the First Amendment rights of 170 million Americans and deprive five million small businesses of a platform that they rely on to grow and create jobs, the company said.
Yeah, I really don't think that TikTok cares about the First Amendment, to be fair. The bill's author, Republican Mike Gallagher, the Republican chairman for the Special House Committee, focused on China, rejected TikTok's assertion of a ban. Rather, he said it's an effort to force a change in TikTok's ownership.
He also took issue with TikTok urging some users to call their representatives and urge them to vote no on the bill. I did see that, that there was a big there was like a, a, a notification on TikTok, That's having all of the users of TikTok send or call their representatives. It says the notification that urged TikTok users to speak up now before your government strips 170 million Americans of their constitutional right to free expression.
The notification also warns that the ban of TikTok would damage millions of businesses and destroy the lives of countless creators across the country. Today, it's about, it's about our bill, and it's not intimidating members considering that bill. But tomorrow it could be misinformation or lies about an election, about a war, about any number of things Gallagher said.
This is why we can't take a chance of having a dominant news platform in America controlled or owned by a company that is behold of the Chinese Communist Party and their foremost adversary. Now, I don't disagree there. I just don't think that's the sentiment of this. I just think that if you were concerned about that, you just, you know, honestly get rid of all social media platforms.
Our world would be much better. And I, this is an avid user of social media. That's how I've grown my podcast. That's how you know about me, likely. Get rid of it. It'd be better for my children, it'd be better for your children, it'd be better for your grandchildren, it'd be better for our country. Get rid of all social media.
It's a fucking cancer on our population, on our society as a whole. It's terrible for children, it's terrible for adults, it makes people lazy, it sucks up all of your time, and it hijacks your dopamine system so that you feel the need to, like, I'm just as guilty of it, like, pffft. I try to be better about it, but just like everybody else, I'm just as guilty about it.
And sometimes I sit there just and I go on tiktok. I go on instagram now and it's like just Maybe the way that I you know, I consume my feed and and for this podcast and stuff, but it's just political bullshit I don't know. What's more fake american politics or Pro wrestling like it's it's so irritating even though a lot of the influencers a lot of the the top people in the Republican influencer space and the Democratic influencer space.
They're all full of shit They're all being pushed to you know, say certain things about certain topics and they're all being paid to do So they're all terrible at marketing with their shitty t shirt companies. They're, they're all just repost bullshit videos that are regurgitated from other accounts without any value or narration on them.
It's just trash, like, trash, trash, trash, trash, trash. That's all social media is. And so, yeah, sure, ban TikTok, but ban Instagram and Meta and, and, you know, Axe, ban them all. Get rid of them. We don't need them. Let's, let's, let's use a fucking phone to call somebody instead, like, let's, let's go back, right?
Like, you wanna talk about, you know conservativism? Let's get rid of those, get off my lawn! You know? Anyways, as I get older, I just have come to accept the fact that I'm an angry old man. And that's okay. I think that's probably the right way to be in today's society anyways. All right. Not sure what's going on there.
Okay, cool. So let's move into the Ryan Garcia situation. So Ryan Garcia, professional boxer, has come out on, on a Instagram, or I'm sorry, a ex tirade, tirade, calling out celebrities. Dropping names like Oprah Winfrey, saying that he was tied down in a forest by men in black robes and forced to watch some horrific acts conducted on children.
And I'm sorry, like trigger warning, whatever you want to say, there's some terrible stuff here, guys. I'm sorry. It's not like if you want to skip ahead 15 minutes, but it's, it's, it's pretty serious stuff. So the Ryan Garcia. Pro boxer, very, very active, has a fight April 20th. Now some people are saying that he's doing this to promote his fight.
I don't think so. If you hear this guy's voice and you know what he's going through right now, I don't think that he's faking this for fight promotion. I also just don't think he's that smart. He's had 240 pro boxing matches. So he's probably has a lot of brain damage too. Now I don't think that means or diminishes anything that he's saying because everything he's saying we already know to be true.
We know that. All of the celebrities and politicians and most powerful people in the world meet in Bohemian Grove, or at least they did. Till it was infiltrated and now everybody knows where it's at and how to get there. But at least they did, right? I think who was it? It wasn't Kennedy. Was it Truman?
I think it was Truman said that it was the most faggoty place on earth. That is a direct quote from a former president that Bohemian Grove is the most faggoty place on earth. Excuse my 2020, you know 2010 language there's apparently we're not allowed to say that anymore, but the president said it So, you know blame him not me anyways And so what this, if you don't know about Bohemian Grove, it's a whole rabbit hole and I'm sure I've done a whole episode on it at least once, or had some deep dives into it.
Essentially all these politicians and all these most powerful people in the world, very well known, been infiltrated, we know this happens, they all go there, they dress up in robes, they gather around this owl statue, this like 30 foot tall owl statue. Might be exaggerated, but it's probably pretty close to that huge owl statue.
And then they light on fire while they're in a circle in their robes with masks on this effigy that is supposed to be a sacrifice to the owl God or Malak, right? The, the, Baphomet, the, you know, the evil entities of the world. They're doing a satanic ritual out in the woods. Very well known, well documented, Go Google it.
Alex Jones at one point infiltrated it with a video camera and found them doing this effigy, found it happening live. So you can go go do that research. It's there. It's real thing. Okay, so he talks about it and says that he was brought there, taken by men in black robes, and I'll let you him tell you some of it here.
All right, here you go.
I don't give a fuck any. Hold on one second here, guys.
Anymore where
all right here we go. Hey, bro. All right. Talk to us. Oh, I don't give a fuck bro. They help Okay, and so this was after an initial release of, so I'll start from the beginning before I play this video for you. It needs a little bit of context. Ryan Garcia said that his phone was taken from him, that he was forced, his money was taken from him, all this stuff.
He posted a video, like there was a video saying, it's kind of a weird situation, it was like, we got him, we slid his throat, something like that. On Ryan Garcia's Twitter, like they, they took over his Twitter. They said he still has his, their, his Instagram. We slit his throat, 666, Satan, the devil, whatever.
It was like this super weird, random tweet that went out. Okay. That happened like 12 hours later, after some people thought he was dead. Ryan Garcia posts a video. And in this video, he looks completely disheveled. He looks like traumatized and he basically says, I'm okay, guys. I can't really talk about what's going on, but I'm okay.
Just wanted to let you know, I'm not dead. Okay, then he starts to release information about Bohemian Grove and what these people did. Andrew Tate then goes on and says, let's do a live, I'll let you share your story. They jump on a live and here you go. They made me watch little kids get raped. I don't give a fuck anymore.
Where?
Bro, they fucking took me to the fucking woods, bro, and they fucking tied I'm not fucking joking, bro. I have fucking proof, bro. I don't give a fuck. Bro, I fucking will show you every fucking video you could ever fucking believe. Bohemian Grove is real. They fucking tied me down and they made me fucking watch, dawg.
I absolutely don't give a fuck anymore. Yes, I fucking lost it. They're raping little kids. He doesn't want to take us all, so let's go. Come on, Ryan. He doesn't want to take us all. Bro, fuck this dude, dude. Who? Who? Bro, you know the higher elites, bro. You already know who they are, bro. You know the path you're going down is dangerous, my friend.
I don't give a fuck. I don't give a fuck. They can't touch me. I'm a god. Well, that's the first point of contention, because I care about you a lot, and I can assure you, from my own personal experience, that they can touch you, which is the worst part about it. Bro, no, they can't, bro. Alright, so come touch me, you fucking bitch.
You have proof of these things on You have proof of this on your phone? Yes, of course I do. The fuck you talking about? Of course. If Alex could get a fucking video from the Bohemian Grove, of course I could.
Well, I have to be careful what I say, because I'm in the middle of a judicial process right now. You want me to get you out of it? Bro, my door gets kicked in if I say what I'm thinking. Okay, well I can help you get out of it if you want. I know people. Tell
everyone at home then. Start from the beginning. When did this happen? Where did this happen? What exactly did you see? Why have you tweeted the things you've tweeted? Let people at home understand you. Because I don't give a fuck, bro. They rate me, right? I was two years old, they rate me. I have proof of that too.
Why have you tweeted the things you've tweeted? So you have to honestly appreciate Andrew Tate. Like, you know, I love everybody shits on Andrew Tate. I've shit on Andrew Tate rightfully in some situations, but you have to appreciate the way he's organizing Ryan's thoughts, right? He's obviously much more articulate, much better at having a conversation than the emotionally heightened state, at least that Ryan's in right now.
So again, you have to appreciate about how he's going about this. Even saying that, you know, be careful the path that you're going down, my friend, this is a dangerous one and they can touch you. You're not untouchable. You're not a God. They can get you. And that's the scary part, he says. So here we go.
Tweeted the things you've tweeted. Let people at home understand you a little bit more. Because I don't give a fuck, bro. They rate me, right? I was two years old, they rate me. I have proof of that too. That's where it all started, bro. Jeez. Okay, you do know there's going to be certain people who believe and I'm Ryan, you know, I like you speaking for years, you know, there's going to be people who believe you're just saying this because you've, I don't know, had a mental breakdown or taking drugs and you're repeating some of the things you've said on the internet and they're going to not believe you unless you come at it very coherently.
Andrew, Andrew, I'll go to the fucking Romania and take a drug test in front of your face. Bro, you don't want to come here. You don't need to remain in jail. It's not your fight camp. But I'm just asking, like, you're gonna have to tell a far more coherent story from start to finish for people to truly understand that.
What you're saying happened is what you saw and that this is not some sort of episode or anything else. This is my advice to you as a brother. I'm trying to make it, if you want people to believe you, you're gonna have to come along and explain from the absolute beginning exactly how it happened, who was involved, how you got there, what car you were in, where you were standing, everything.
Of course they're gonna want that and I have all the information possible. Okay, so when you're releasing it, how you're releasing it, or are you keeping it for yourself? Because it looks like you don't want to keep it for yourself. I don't. At the right time I'm gonna release all of it, but at the right time I'm gonna do it.
They're already calling me to tell me to stop. I don't give a fuck, dude. I've already had a meeting with them.
I'm gonna let you sit with that, Andrew. With who? All right, bro. Well, I want you to know that either way, I'm praying for you, and I hope that Thank you, bro. You know, and I mean that. I don't give a fuck, bro. Alex Jones has been saying the same shit, and they try to get The only reason they can't stop me, because they listen to the devil.
I listen to God. God gave me authority. It's over for everybody, bro. Now, again, to Andrew Tate's point, and you probably won't hear me say that very often, but he does seem to be in some type of Mental breakdown, but obviously, you know, just by the way he's speaking is very Emotionally heightened his voice is shaky, but wouldn't you be Like, if you were sitting in front of, when this was going on, there's 26, 000 people hearing you talk about being raped as a child, like, wouldn't you feel that way?
Wouldn't you be heightened emotionally? Wouldn't you have a mental breakdown if that happened? Like, and again, nothing he's saying is crazy. We already know that these things were happening. We already know Epstein was real. We already know Bohemian Grove is a super creepy, weird place where they have satanic rituals.
And, you know, To, to Andrew Tate's point though, like, are you just puppeting, are you, are you just parroting the situations that you hear online? Are you just parroting what, the information that you have heard from other people talk about and just like stringing these together? But why, why would you do that?
Why, why, what would be the purpose of that? That, that's not going to help him. You know, it's, it's really not good PR for his fight that he says that, and, and honestly, no man's going to come out and say, I got raped. Like, there's very little of the, you know, Me Too situation happening in men in highly visible spaces.
And we'll find that out more with what we see with P. Diddy. And the Lil Rod situation coming up is like, this guy was tormented for years by this man. Lived with him and didn't speak up because that's like, not generally what men do in this situation. It's just not. Especially people who are very in the public eye.
It's, it's, it's embarrassing, I'm sure. And, and something that you have to contend with in a different way, especially when you're highly visible like these people are. So again, you would have a mental breakdown. You would be heightened emotionally. You would stutter over your words and be, you know, use a bunch of swear words when you're talking and like, You would do those things, regardless, so I don't think that detracts from his opinion, and I don't, you know, this guy's also had a bunch of fights, so I don't think he's like the most articulate person in the world, I'm sure he has some serious head trauma, but I don't think that means that he's not telling the truth.
And so, As we go further into this, let's go ahead and read some of the tweets that came from him. Now there was a whole 25 minute live that he did that I listened into. You can go to his Twitter right now and listen in. He did a full live video. You know, maybe I'll play a few minutes of that for you guys here.
But the most recent conversation that he had is, is this one, which says that I'm not talking about anything else other than fighting. He's in the fight camp right now. He has a fight in the, like six weeks or so. So. Let me start you from the timeline beginning. Here is the video that I was talking about if it's still up of him essentially saying I'm, okay.
I'm alive. They took my phone. Okay. Here's where it starts Hey guys, it's me ryan I'm here to explain what's going on I'm, not in possession of my phone. I can't get access to my instagram My cards are locked And i'm just being real Oh, you know I'm being real, taking advantage, and I personally wanted just to send out a video to the people that love me and my fans, family that's concerned that I'm okay.
I'm not dead. I believe in Jesus. All those are lies. And, you know, in jail, they're blocking my cards. I can't access my money. Nobody's hitting me back. I don't know what's going on, but just know I'm okay, look. He was being targeted by some organization or some group of people that are obviously somewhat powerful if they can get into all of his accounts, if they can freeze all of his bank accounts, if they can get into all of his social media accounts, if they can cut off his communication with everybody at one time.
It's obviously a pretty powerful entity, right? It's not just some random guy next door. And you see the look on his face. He looks, like I said, disheveled. He looks concerned. He looks like meek, almost. Which is not generally the case for a guy with 250 pro boxing fights. Like you just hear it in the sound of his voice.
He sounds a little scared. Which rightfully, if somebody goes onto your account and says they slit your throat, it freezes your bank accounts, all that stuff at one time. So, and this is where it all started. This is where it all got triggered to, to begin. And it sounds like from there, he's just like, all right, And he's going to just say everything that happened that he's been holding back in fear of these organizations that are potentially going after him.
And that's speculation, but that's what it seems like to me. It seems to be some, you know, you don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to kind of take that out of the context of what's happening. Now he posted a bunch of other things. that all got deleted. Now, I don't know if he deleted them. He says that they got deleted off of X, but I do have those tweets and I'll read them to you.
It says, if they post my phone, I will post on someone else's. It's in plain sight. It's trying, I'm trying to screen record the rules of devil worshiping and they are deleting it. Can someone DM me their account info so I can tweet? They are going to attempt to stop me. I'm going to set up a drive a live drug test to prove that I'm not trippin I feel like crying because i'm giving everyone info.
They already know but they refuse to believe do you want proof now? I'll get it asap he said If they take my phone, I will post on someone else's. More you ask, or what's up? It's that three Disney workers, school athletic, he posted screenshots. Three Disney workers, school athletic director among 219 arrested in Florida human trafficking sting.
Wow. And that was posted from 2023 September. So just a few months ago, he said, please help send prayers. I'm calling all prayer warriors. You think you'd be you think you'd be quiet if they killed kids and showed you and did it over and over. I'm done. I have lost it. And so have you. My pain is unbearable.
I can't describe I will be killed soon. Hurry find you think you you think you'd be quiet if they killed kids and showed you and did it over and over and over. I'm done. I've lost it. And so have you. My pain is unbearable. Wow. So, pretty dark stuff there. But then he went on to say that they auction off kids.
That's one of the next tweets. He goes on to show that a video from a Bohemian Grove situation. He starts saying that I didn't kill myself. I love God and my kids. I love Jesus. I'm healthy and I have no medical issues for the record. I'm with my wife, Drea. All the other stuff is cap. For you who are not Gen Z, like me, cap means a lie.
You're welcome. Let's see what this is. Says I'm changing. Let's see. He brought up the Vatican as well as Oprah Winfrey. He said, how many more kids will y'all allow this to happen to? And then he posted some posts from the Catholic church abusing children. He said, why do you think that in all scary movies, they are always use a priest from Catholic churches because they are molesters and they allow you to disrespect God.
Hmm. So wait, I'm the bad guy for calling out an institution that has an unbearable or unbelievable amount of rape and molestation. And I'm the bad guy. I'm the crazy one. So everyone's getting real quiet now. Interesting. He, he, he also said something along the lines of, and I say along the lines of, but I'm just reading it verbatim.
They actually have the files on Jesus, the Ark of the Covenant, the giants, the clones, the aliens files on everything. They are the ones. That let me in. Now, again, sounds pretty crazy in the way that he's going on this, like, tirade, back to back to back to back to back tweets. You know, I have my beliefs on almost every one of the things that he said there, which are definitely reasonable.
Clones, check, we know that. Ark of the Covenant, super weird and interesting situation there. The Giants, we talked about the Nephilim. Alien files, we know that to be true. But when you put it in this unarticulate way, where it just sounds like you're ranting like crazy, it does sound crazy. Because when you put it all together, it is crazy.
But it is crazy when you put it all together. But bitch, we live in a crazy world. All of these things have a potential of being true. But he's just not very good at discussing it. At least in a way that's believable, right? So he keeps going on and on talks about Gaza, all of this and that. So, so after a little bit, he does have a live that he's like, all right, come on here.
Ask me anything. I'll play a little bit, just a couple minutes of that for you guys and just kind of go move around on the video. So I'm letting anybody ask any question for the time being to whenever we get off. How do we start this? People are coming in. People are coming in. Hello guys. I don't know how to run a space.
I don't even know how to do this. How do you do this? How do I let people speak? They said the request, how do you let them speak? Oh, all right. So let's get this part. I'm, I'm, I'm going in on everybody.
Wait, Brian, so to all the people that are asking why you don't show the clips, can you answer? No, there's, just so you know, there's 674, 000 listens to this audio. So it's not like this is some random weirdo, right? This guy's very, very well known celebrity athlete. Is there a question for them? I can't show the clips.
They're already out there. I mean, there's so many clips. It's unbelievable. I know everybody wants me to put out my evidence, but I can't put out my evidence or else they're going to come after my family. So I choose not to. Oh, you can speak on me.
Gummy, whatever your name, Gumi. Gummy don't want to speak. Bro. Oh, there you go. Can you hear me? Yes.
Hello. Everybody's like, yo, put the drink down. Okay, fine. I won't fucking drink, but I'm still gonna tell the truth. Sober or not. I have more balls than you. I put my ball sack on everybody. . They told me they're gonna, they told me they're gonna make an example on me that because I say Jesus so much, they're gonna pit me on the cross and they're gonna crucify me in the whole world and say, yep, this is what we do.
This is what we do. Hmm. So please help me out. I don't, I mean, if it's that, if that's what's supposed to happen, let God's will be done, not mine. I'm okay with that. And this is the truth. Have I lied about anything else? Nothing. So why would I lie about that? Ryan, I'm a father of two kids. Yes. I'm saying this because I'm worried about my children.
Okay. Okay. Keep doing what you're doing. Keep clear. Ryan, listen to me. Listen to me. You know me. I've talked to you about mental health. Don't worry, brother. Nothing's going to happen to me. Here, Patriot speaker. Yes. As I'm going to just add, it's 25 minutes. You can go listen to the full thing. I was like, yeah, I'm serious.
Why? So I'm going to commit and I'm going to do it. And I just did it. I was just like, God gave me the authority and the power to do it. And I seized it through amongst all the, the locks and all the people trying to confuse me, throw me off, say, what you're doing is a little this and that. I'm like, who cares?
Watch what happens. And look at everything's and Ryan, if they think you, if they think you lying, bro. I just want to drop this on people real quick cause they don't, they don't, you know, I want to put this out there real quick cause I talk about this shit a lot. You got an executive order right now, one three eight one eight.
I'll say it again. One three eight one eight that addresses human rights abuse and human trafficking that was done in 2017 and that's why all these motherfucking people coming out the woodworks and shit. And a lot of CEOs and shit stepping down and all this shit. I got the FC names, if you want me to start dropping them.
Exactly. Oprah. What? Who cares? I do. What do you mean? That's what I'm saying. That's what I'm saying. And this is, this is all. Alright, so I'll leave that to you. You can listen through that yourself. I don't want to bore you with a 25 minute Twitter space with Some, like I said, less than articulate people discussing these things.
But, but I do think that it's worth a listen. There's some value in what he's saying. Again, the delivery is not very well done. And I think that's what Andrew Tate did a good job trying to hone him in a little bit and go tell us your evidence. Tell us why we should believe you. And here's the thing too.
Let's say Ryan Garcia is lying. How many celebrities with millions of followers are going out there and even driving awareness to this? So like let's say he wasn't tied down in a forest in Bohemian Grove And maybe he has some mental health issues and maybe those mental health issues are Exacerbated by getting into these rabbit holes that are very very real of very real things happening right now around the world That we know about right we find out more about it with with P Diddy, right?
But maybe let's just say he's lying Even if he's lying, even if he's having a mental breakdown, even if he's gone way too far down the rabbit hole and he can't handle the truth of the reality of what these people do to children. Which is a horrific thing and it's put me into terrible, you know, like a depressive state having to do all this research on these things and having to deal with the, the, the reality that these things are real and there's very, you know, horrific things happening right now around the world.
I remember when I found out about Operation Underground Railroad and which is the, the movie is written about and this was before the movie came out, there was documentary about Operation Underground Railroad and the things that they were doing. Now, I'm not going to get into a whole thing about the, the situation with the owner and the guy who's depicted in the movie and all of that stuff, because there's a whole candy worms to open up their too.
But I watched the documentary before I heard about it from anybody. I knew some people that were involved in these types of these types of task force and had tremendous respect for them and wanted to learn more about it. And as soon as I got done watching that, I was so deep in the hole. That I would have quit everything just to go save and rescue children that I would have joined a task force I actually put it in an application with them to be a part of their their team that goes and does that It's probably still sitting there somewhere where right now and they never got back to me, which is okay, I guess But I was ready to drop everything and I was ready to do something about it What is a more noble task than to save these children going through these things?
There is very real situations There's warehouses around the world that that are Have children without social security numbers that are being literally bred for this type of situation. And it's, it's horrible, and I'm not going to take you there right now. But, I will say that it can take you down a very dark, dark path.
And you have to be emotionally and mentally stable and capable of handling the knowledge. Because once you learn that, it's very difficult to navigate the everyday world knowing that this is happening underneath the surface. And so again, even if he's lying, even if he, this didn't happen to him, even if, let's say he's a celebrity with a lot of head trauma who's going into a mental breakdown.
I'm still glad that he's raising awareness because everything that he's talking about is very real. Even if it didn't happen to him, I don't give a fuck whether it happened to Ryan Garcia, but I do know that this happened to someone, somewhere, someone's child right now in this world at this very moment.
Who cares if Ryan Garcia is telling the truth? What I care about is that there's being awareness given to the situation, that maybe he is telling the truth. But regardless of whether he is or he isn't, I'm glad that he's bringing awareness to this because this is a topic that should be discussed by every celebrity with every connection everywhere across the country, across the globe, at all times, until it's rectified.
And the light has been shined on the darkness enough to where it is. escapes into a deep dark hole and never presents itself again. That is what I would want. And I'm happy that he is, he is causing this potential for this to, to, to occur because there's very, very few celebrities, but we're actually seeing a lot more, which is becoming a theme in this situation.
There was more recently a video that came out talking about how Matt Reif and another comedian were being forced to enter the being forced by two executives saying that they'll make them famous and all they have to do is perform a sex act on them. That's a wild claim too. But we know Harvey Weinstein existed.
We know that there's these gatekeepers in Hollywood and the music industry, P. Diddy being one of them, as we will see a little bit later. This is a very real thing, even if for adults, even if for people who want to be famous. They have to have blackmail on you. You have to become a part of their little scheme.
You have to have, you know, some questionable sexuality, and that's just the reality of the Hollywood and the music executives and the world that we live in, the high level politics, like even Madison Cawthorn talks about the orgies that were happening in Washington DC, right? We know these honeypot schemes are happening all around the world.
We know that, right? This is all true shit, guys. Like this is, yeah, again, Maybe the not most, maybe not the most articulate way of putting it. But everything he's saying is true, whether it's, it happened to him or not. And so, hundreds of, hundreds of thousands of people watched this one video. 700, 000 people now have more awareness about what's going on in the world.
And again, some of those people might not be able to handle that truth. But as long as it's being talked about and discussed, they have to hide it. They have to, they have to go into some far corner of the reality that we live in to do these things. They have to get out of the public light, the Epstein's will no longer be able to navigate the social circles that they, he did.
Jeez, can't talk. Because it's so in the public space. I write everybody knows that about Hollywood. Everybody knows that about the music industry. Now, everybody knows that about high level politics and the elites and the Virgin Islands, like the Brussels or the, you know, the Branson's and the Epstein's that like, everybody knows those things now.
And good, keep talking about it until something's done, and they go away, or they're all killed off, or they're all in jail. That's all I want, right? And so good, if you do that to children, you should have the worst things happen to you. Right. If you're a part of that, that world. Okay. So that's the situation with Ryan Garcia.
There's, there's more to come. He says he's not talking about it. I'll give you one segue out of this, which is the fact that, Well, let's go ahead and let's listen to this clip first. Then I'll segue between Ryan Garcia and P Diddy. Cause PD is really the deep dive for today. And I'm not sure how, how long we'll be able to discuss that, but I do have a full 30 or 73 page legal documents highlighted outlines for us to discuss today about these very things.
Okay. But first, let me tell you why I started Ronin. So after learning about EMF radiation, doing the deep dive into 5g, right. Here's my, my quick little pitch for you. The reason I started Ronin is because I looked for these Faraday products myself. Okay, I went online, I found there's, there's three or four of them that are out there.
And one of them has decent design, but they're so expensive. A backpack is 850 literally. Okay. The other ones, when it comes to the apparel hats, that type of thing, their design work sucks. It was never anything I would want to wear and also very expensive. It was 90 for a hat, which is like, I'm not fucking spending 90 on a hat, especially if it looks like shit.
So, and so. Having the background that I did, and I do I decided to, you know, I have a pretty heavy marketing background. And so I sourced the supplies and found a way that we can create these products and create them in a way that they're going to be affordable, in a way that they're going to be a design that I would actually be confident and comfortable wearing.
And, and once I have these products shipped, you will not see me on this video without a Ronin hat on my head and you will love them too, I promise. So I made affordable and Actually desirable designs with these Faraday products that I've worked alongside this manufacturer for months and months to build.
And so again, I ask you, there was only a few more spots left on the initial order and I'm doing it at a steeply discounted rate. The hats, I believe are about 40 to 45. Normally they're going to be a little bit more expensive than that, but nowhere near 90. So less than half of the cost in the, in the material, to be fair, the material that's, Lined in these is somewhat expensive.
And that's really where some of the cost comes from. But I do think that some of the other organizations are just taking advantage of the fact that you don't know any better. So if you get it right now, it's half the cost of anywhere else. Both the backpacks is a fifth, a sixth of the cost. It's 180 for the backpack.
And it's, it's. 45 for the baseball hat 40 for the beanie. Okay, only right now though because the prices are going to go up It's not going to go up like a hundred percent and up to their prices. I promise But I do have to make some margin on this what i'm really trying to do guys is just be able to get that first Bulk order so I don't have to spend thousands of dollars out of my pocket to get the bulk order to start doing the campaigns for you guys to get you to Get on this train because I truly believe that the effect that we can have in the country if we get any Everybody with a Faraday bag and everybody with an EMF blocking hat.
One of the 10 foil hats, I believe that there will be a massive disruption in the way that we interact with technology and our health and everything will be much, much better as a result. So I'm super excited about this. The website is being launched as we speak. Don't purchase from the website because the prices are higher than what you'll get it for at the pre sale launch.
But if you do want to go check out the website and the work that I'm doing there, that's going to be launched very, very soon. It's Ronan. It's RonanBasics. com, R O N I N B A S I C S, RonanBasics. com, and you can check it all out there. All right. I appreciate you guys. I love you guys. Thank you for the support.
Go to the, the website. Go to the show notes here right under where you're listening to the podcast and you'll see that it'll be the very very first link will be the pre launch sale of Ronin and I'll be tracking seeing how well you guys respond to this because again, I know my podcast listeners. I know you guys.
I love you guys. I've been talking to you and for, you know, over a hundreds of hours now. So I know you guys will love this too. And I know you'll support me. So thank you so much in advance. All right. Segway back to creepy Hollywood and music executives. Here's the video about Matt Reif. Here we go.
Comedy Kat Williams The dark side of hollywood is finally being exposed Thanks to one of the true kings of comedy kat williams You know before I became wealthy in business. I actually had a somewhat successful career in stand up comedy I was on the way up I was invited to a meeting With some Hollywood executives along with some now famous comedian and we were offered the chance for a deal at online stardom.
But the only way to receive the contract was by sucking both of the execs off. I immediately got up and walked to the door. But before I could even exit, the other comedian was sucking. Both of their d k simultaneously. That guy's name was Matt Reif. And that's Alpha King rule number 799. Just because someone is more famous than you, it doesn't mean they're better.
They might just be gayer.
It doesn't mean they're better, they just might be gayer. No, I don't think I believe this guy. But if this is marketing, this is great marketing because I've never seen this guy's face before, but his delivery is honestly too good. It's too practiced. It's it, there's very little emotion in it. It's, it seems to me like this is, this guy's full of shit, but a pretty good comedy bit if he is nonetheless.
But. I didn't hear that whole video all the way through. So that's, that's pretty funny. Tom Segura and I think Duncan Trestle did a video. Making fun of this. Like I thought everybody knew you had to suck a dick to get into comedy. Like that's just the rule. And I think Matt Reif went and like blocked the guy who posted this Dom Lucre and all of this stuff and drama.
I like Matt Reif. I think he's pretty damn funny. His crowd works amazing. I have nothing against the guy. I think this is pretty funny. And Hey, if you had to suck a dick. for hundreds of millions of dollars or whatever that dude's making and you're happy to do it. I got nothing against your man. Do you, my friend?
It might not be more, better comedy. You just might be gayer. Oh, that's so funny. But if Reif is, he's a comedian, Again, a younger guy probably in his early 20s, mid 20s at this point sweeping the world on Tik Tok and all this stuff and got promoted a ton, like. Went into stardom like there's only a couple people who have really gotten super famous out of nowhere in the last couple of years It's like that out.
What's her name? the podcaster Shit, why am I blanking on her name right now? The really good podcast whatever her name is, you know who she is on Instagram She just basically interviewed every largest celebrity ever Mark Cuban Drake, oh god, why can't I think of her name right now? Anyways, Bobby, that's what it is.
Bobby Althoff and then Matt Reif. Like those two people got famous, like overnight. Seemingly no reason I met rice, talented Bobby is somewhat funny but not really enough to, to become that famous. So definitely some questions to be had there. But he did mention another thing, which is that there's a bunch of high level celebrities, like very, very well known people starting to have these conversations now.
Ryan Garcia, Cat Williams you know, the P. Diddy situation is coming up. Ice Cube was just talking about it. Like all of these people are starting to have these conversations about the underworld that is Hollywood and fame. Now again, I don't think I believe this guy. This guy seems to be, you know, before I was a super wealthy business executive, I tried my hand at comedy and just didn't suck enough dicks to be successful.
Like, eh, you're probably not that funny, buddy. But it's good marketing nonetheless. If you're into that kind of marketing. Okay. That has 25 million views, by the way. Pretty crazy. All right, so that brings me to the next point, which is that Ryan Garcia posted something about P. Diddy just Minutes ago, like literally an hour ago as I was doing my last second research on all of this And he posted this I heard Devil Haney is bringing P.
Diddy to training camp to spar First one to tap out wins doghouse rules. Now that starts to gain some context as we start to talk about this. Now Ryan Garcia did he's say he's only going to talk about boxing, but the fact that he's bringing up P Diddy right now in the midst of this legal lawsuit about sex trafficking and the manipulation of minors and like all the stuff we're about to go into.
It's pretty, pretty good on Ryan Garcia's part that he put those two together. Still talking about just boxing, by the way. So an impressive you know, sub, sub tweet there by Ryan Garcia. I'm not sure sub tweets still a thing. I remember it was like in 2011 when I used to actually use Twitter.
Speaking of, if you do have a Twitter, you should follow me, the Austin J Adams. I just got one, like. Never really used Twitter at all, but I'm using it consistently now, so all my content's there. So, the Austin J. Adams on Twitter. Anyways so there's a picture of P. Diddy, and I'll show you right here briefly if you're on YouTube.
You'll be able to see it, but and he tweeted out again, I heard Devil Haney is bringing P. Diddy to training camp. Basically saying that, you know, cause P. Diddy is, Gay. He talks about having sex with Meek Mill and Usher, allegedly, within these court documents, all this stuff. So, yeah. Alright, so let's go ahead and segue into the Usher situation.
So, or I'm sorry, well, is kind of Usher's situation too, but P. Diddy's situation. So P. Diddy has a lawsuit against him by Lil Rod. Lil Rod, being the producer for P. Diddy during some of his movies. Recent work. And so the allegations against him are pretty wild, but this isn't something new. P Diddy had a lawsuit against him by his former girlfriend Cassie for very, very similar things, almost exactly the same things that he's talking about here.
And so no, nothing really new coming out, but it is some, some, there is some new information here. That's definitely more alarming. And Epstein's name is mentioned like four times in P Diddy's legal documents. So let, let's start it like this. P Diddy has a lawsuit against him. For being the Epstein of the music industry.
Essentially setting up and wiring his whole home. His entire house, every single room with cameras so that he could spy on politicians, musicians, celebrities that come to all of his crazy house parties that he would recruit sex workers and underage minors to drug them and then have them go do whatever they're going to do in these bedrooms and record it.
So he has blackmail on everybody in the house. The industry, all the celebrities, all the politicians, everybody who came through, everybody who he drugged essentially, and then would hire these prostitutes to come into these parties and go off with these celebrities, go off with these politicians into these rooms that were wired with cameras so that he could then have blackmail.
And this is corroborated. There's proof of this and evidence of this in the hearing and in the legal documentation that I'm about to show you. And so we can take a look at that. And start to walk through it together because it's, it's unbelievable. Some of the stuff that's in here and we'll start it from the beginning.
All right. There's, there's video evidence, there's photos, there's screenshots that show that he used blackmail and, and video recorded everybody in his house doing these sex acts and would manipulate maybe manipulate. It's not the right word, but would coerce. These music artists and celebrities into, doing like gay acts for power and like all of this stuff.
So let me go ahead and pull it up for you here. And we'll look at these documents together. Here we go. Let's see if I can get this into a full view for you. Full screen mode. Maybe not. Alright. Read mode. Maybe not.
Alright. So anyways, let's start at the very beginning of this. The allegations against P. Diddy are, are, are wild. But if you know about P. Diddy's history, again, it's, it's not that staggering. Because it, it all seems very, very believable. Because there's some of these things that have been allegations against him before.
Alright, so starting at the very beginning. This is Sean P. Diddy Combs V. Rodney Jones. Okay. The other people listed, this is case number 24, 1457. And I will include these documents in the show notes for you. It's 73 pages long. I'll include my highlights. You can check it all out there. Okay. So here we go.
says trigger warning. Yeah, for sure. There's some pretty crazy stuff in here that will definitely be triggering to, to some people if you've dealt with things like this before. So you've been warned.
All right, so here it is Rodney Jones verse Sean Combs, otherwise known as P Diddy. All right, and I'll walk you through all of this. with me here on the documentation. If you want this documentation, it's 73 page legal documents that I had to pay to get, but I'll, I'll upload my version of it with all of my highlights in the show notes for you.
So you can go check it out as well. Alright, so, we'll skip through some of this. This shows the defendant is Justin Dior Combs, is the son of Mr. Combs, and Ms. J. Combs was born on December 1993. Okay, anyways defendant Sean Combs is a rapper, right? We know that. P. Diddy, Puffy, Puff Daddy, Puffy, Diddy, Brother Love.
Anyways, we know who we're talking about here. Okay. Now the other people listed in here is the former CEO of defend of defendant Motown Records, and his name is defendant Ethiopia. Hab to Miriam is the former CEO and this is talking about Lucy and Charles Grange, who is a CEO of defendant of Universal Music Group is listed in this as helping cover up aid in the bad, the sex trafficking acts.
The next person is the Ethiopian Hab to Miriam. which is the chief of staff who would basically supply him with drugs, all of that stuff. Then his chief of staff, all these people are listed within here, universal records, love records, so on and so forth. Okay. So here's the summary. It says from September 2022 to November 2023, Mr.
Jones produced nine songs on Mr. Combs love album. Mr. Jones lived with Mr. Combs for months at a time, spending holidays, birthdays, and missing major family events. Mr. Jones resided at Mr. Combs residence located in Los Angeles, California, New York, and Miami, Florida. Mr. Jones also spent several weeks on the yacht rented by Mr.
Combs in the U S of Virgin islands throughout his time. As we mentioned those islands, huh? Interesting. Throughout his time, Mr. Combs, Mr. Jones Mr. Jones witnessed, experienced, and endured many things that went far beyond his role as a producer of the Love Album. The claims raised in this complaint have been corroborated through witness statements, video, audio recordings, and images that Mr.
Jones has in his possession. Mr. Combs required Mr. Jones to record him constantly. On several occasions, Mr. Combs took Mr. Jones's cell phone and began recording himself. As a result, Mr. Jones has secured hundreds of hours of footage and audio recordings of Mr. Combs, his staff, and his guests engaging in serious illegal activities.
Mr. Jones secured irrefutable evidence of the acquisition, use, and distribution of drugs, ecstasy, cocaine, GHB, ketamine, marijuana, and mushrooms, displaying and distribution of unregistered firearms. Mr. Combs provided laced alcoholic beverages to minors and sex workers at his homes in California, New York, and the U.
S. Virgin Islands and Florida. Mr. Combs chief of staff, Christina Corriman, instructing her staff to retrieve drugs so she can provide it to Mr. Combs. Christian Combs drugging and sexually assaulting a woman, Mr. Combs detailing how he planned to leverage his relationship with Bishop T. D. Jakes to soften the impact on his public image of Cassie Ventura's lawsuit, Young Miami's cousin or assistant sexually assaulting Mr.
Jones, actor Cuba Gooding Jr., a sexually harassing and assaulting Mr. Jones is listed in the P. Diddy case. Rapper Redacted I'm Mr. Combs yacht consorting with underage girls, sex workers and r and b singer, redacted in Mr. Combs Los Angeles home consorting with underage girls and sex workers, chalice rec recording studio shootings.
So this talks about a situation essentially, where in 2022 p Diddy was at a writers and producers camp, and it was his son and Justin's friend. named G. Mr. G is a 30 year old 30 year old tall African American male. In addition, there was other musicians present at the camp. The writer had spoken to several musicians who attended the camp.
Mr. Jones was approximately two feet away. It says one evening during the camp, Mr. Jones, Jay Combs, his son and G were in a heated conversation. That conversation was moved out of the studio and into a restroom adjacent to where Mr. Jones was sitting. Mr. Jones was approximately two feet away from the bathroom when gunshots rang out.
Mr. Jones recalls hearing multiple gunshots. Mr. Jones immediately went into a state of shock and feared that he would be shot next. Mr. Jones genuinely believed that he would be shot through the door due to how close he was. After the shooting ended, the crowd gathered around the restroom. When the door finally opened, Mr.
Combs and Jay Combs exited. Jay was lying on the restroom floor in a fetal position, holding his stomach and bleeding out of his hip and leg area. Everyone stood around, looking up. At G, Mercer stood around looking upon G. Frustrated by the lack of aid, Mr. Jones dropped everything and began to place pressure on his gunshot wound.
As he was applying pressure to his stomach, Mr. Jones realized that G was gushing blood from an area near his hip and leg, and he decided to lift him up and place him on the toilet. He also forced Mr. Jones, so it says that Mr. Jones lifted him and brought the ambulance to the front of the studio. At the time, Mr.
Combs and Justin disappeared to another part of the studio. Mr. Combs gave strict instructions to inform the police that he had done not, had nothing to do with the shooting. He also forced Mr. Jones to lie to the police by telling them that Gee was shot standing outside the studio by a drive by assailant.
Now from this, and they actually post all of the articles, that the all of the witnesses who spoke with the, with this writer anonymously due to fear of retaliation from Mr. Combs. They agreed to speak publicly when subpoenaed. Hmm. Mr. Jones says he has clothing that actually show it. They show the photos of the shooting and where it was taking place saying that he was not shot outside that it was not a drive by and it was done by P Diddy or his son.
Then it goes on to talk about how he was sexually harassed and assaulted by P. Diddy. Said that they took a place in LA, New York, Florida, and in the Virgin Islands. That he was around him while he was naked, that he would be groped by him in his, groin and butt area. He attempted to groom Mr.
Jones into engaging in gay sex. So what it says next, it says throughout the 1990s he basically said that he looked up to Stevie J, was the guy who is named in the lawsuit, the Mr. Jones and as a result of finding out, P. Diddy basically said that he went as far as to share a video of Stevie J penetrating a Caucasian male without a condom.
This was done to ease Mr. Jones anxiety concerning homosexuality. According to Mr. Combs, this is a normal practice in the music industry. Look, even Stevie J is doing it, P Diddy said, to Lil Rod about having gay sex. This is a normal practice in the music industry, he says. Now this is something we've heard whispers of in a while, right?
And even in this situation, there's a listing of names that were redacted, essentially that say that, you know, people are speculating that P Diddy had sex with Meek Mill and Usher. That he has on camera as well. And then Meek Mill went on this like weird tirade on Twitter as well saying that he, you know, I'm not gay.
I love vagina. Like this whole weird thing.
So this is where it starts to get interesting and insert where some of the sex trafficking situations come up, the underage minors, all of that stuff that we talked about. So essentially what would happen is he would recruit this guy to go and have conversations with sex workers and have them, you know, he basically had a, a, a sign.
So even when he was in the, booby trap on the river, wherever the hell that is, he would, he would tell him to go to this. Strip club and where his bad boys baseball hat and that would be a signal to the prostitutes that he's trying to recruit them essentially to go to his parties. Now what they would do at these parties is interesting and that's where the sex trafficking comes into play here.
So essentially what they would do is they would go recruit these minors. They would go recruit these prostitutes to come over to his parties, his house parties and his, what do they call them? Freak parties, which was essentially like a big Gangbang orgy and then he would drug the politicians, drug the artists, the musicians, the the celebrities that would come over to his house, and he would have cameras wired everywhere.
So if we skip ahead a little bit, these pictures are two women that he allegedly was coerced and forced into having sex with. And if you look at these photos, maybe it wasn't as forced as he's saying here. But as we kind of scroll through here, it gets a little bit darker when you find out that he was essentially.
Saying that he would, he promised him ownership of his 20 million property. This is basically if he just went along with being groomed and, and got, you know peddled into this, this world of, of celebrities and utilized as his own kind of sex slave in this weird scheme. As we find out later with a name like Cuba Gooding Jr.
coming up. As we find out, he almost got trafficked too. But he basically was promised all these, all these, all these things. Amazing things would happen if you just go along with this, this scheme. Right, go find the prostitutes, go coerce these underage girls to come over and party with us. And then we're gonna get all these celebrities to come over and then we're gonna drug the celebrities.
They're gonna hook up with these prostitutes and these underage minors. They're gonna go to the rooms that I have wired with cameras. As we'll find out on page 33 of this, and then we have blackmail on everybody and everybody, anybody that we would want, and that gives us power, right? Blackmail is power, right?
So it says he promised him ownership of his 20 million property. He promised him access to record label executives. And then he would often switch up his approach, and this is where it gets crazy. He would go from promising him the world to threatening him with physical harm. Mr. Combs threatened to eat his face and said, I'm willing to kill my own mother.
What would stop me from killing you? Literally says that verbatim in this legal documentation, Mr. Combs threatened to eat Mr. Jones's face and informed Mr. Jones that he's willing to kill his own mom, Janice Combs, if he must, in order to get what he wants, so he wouldn't think twice to harm Mr. Jones. So let me get this straight.
P Diddy threatened, in a legal document, as we see here, listed, under oath, P Diddy threatened to eat this guy's face. Literally. And said he would kill his own mom. So what would stop me from killing you? That's a crazy thing to say. Absolutely wild, crazy. Crazy thing to say. Wild. Now it goes on to say that in addition to so, I don't even want to glance over that cause that's just like the most wild and crazy thing you could ever say to somebody is that you would eat their face.
That's a whole other rabbit hole, but we're not going to go down that one. It says in addition to sex workers, there was that, so it talks about, this is the next column, which talks about the drugs and illicit acts with minors and sex workers. So it says this was on July 2nd of 2023, so only like seven months ago.
Mr. Combs had a listening party at his home. He said that present at the party was an R& B artist, Jay Combs, sex workers, and underage girls. Mr. Combs requested female sex workers and required Mr. Jones to solicit them. An hour later, several sex workers appeared. In addition to sex workers, there were these five women in the crowd that were under the age of 16.
And then they have photo evidence of him. After being forced to drink a De Leon shots, Mr. Jones began feeling lightheaded. And recalls passing out and waking up at 4 a. m. the following morning naked with a sex worker sleeping next to him Screenshots of a video from that night are embedded below and here are the screenshots wild Okay Now it said mr.
Jones believes that mr. Combs was grooming him to pass him off to his friends This fear became a reality when p diddy introduced mr. Jones to cuba gooding jr While they were on Mr. Combs yacht, and there's photos of this in the legal documentation of him grooming and peddling him off to Cuba Gooding Jr.
You know, the fucking Nickelodeon star, the one from all the kids movies, the Iditarod guy, like, It says, During the introduction, Mr. Combs suggested that Cuba get to know Mr. Jones better. He then left him alone in the makeshift studio on the yacht. In evidenced by the video, of which screenshots are embedded below, Cuba Gooding Jr.
began touching, groping, and fondling Mr. Jones legs, his upper inner thighs near his groin, and small of his back near his buttocks and his shoulders. Mr. Jones was extremely uncomfortable and proceeded to lean away from Cuba Gooding Jr. He rejected his advances and Mr. Gooding Jr. did not stop until Mr.
Jones forcibly pushed him away.
It says that throughout his time with Mr. Combs, That he was Mr. Jones was under an implied work for hire agreement. Talks about all of the, you know, money he wasn't paid, essentially. But there was a portion in there that talks about how this is just what you do in the music industry. Everybody's gay, right?
He had sex with Meek Mill and Usher, allegedly. Like, everybody does it. It's just what we do, right? It's not gay. It's It's Hollywood, right? Like, I think that's gay. And so it goes on to talk about how Mr. Combs, we talked about eating his face crazy. But let's keep moving along here. It goes on to say that, there was another situation of a shooting that occurred a little bit before this, where, when he was dating JLo, where JLo essentially carried a gun into a club for him, passed him the gun after he got into an altercation with somebody, there is a shooting.
Where P. Diddy was arrested, so was J. Lo, after a New York shooting. And this was in, what, 1999. And then, he made it clear that he had immense power in the music industry and with law enforcement. He said Mr. Combs made it clear that his head of security, Fahim Mohammed, had the power to make people and problems disappear.
Now, this is where it gets really interesting, is once you find out about Fahim Muhammad. Fahim Muhammad is his bodyguard. Now, this bodyguard was the one that he said to all of his staff that if you ever get pulled over in L. A. or Miami, you need to just call my bodyguard, and he's got you. He'll get you off no matter what's going on.
This is also the guy that allegedly cleaned up after him after the shootings, after all of his, like, crazy and wild situations, escapades, And this is where it gets weird. So as you realize that. P Diddy was only 24 when he founded Bad Boy Records, one of the most famous and successful record labels of all time, right?
They brought on B. I. G., Notorious B. I. G. and Biggie. They brought, they like had the big, huge feud with Tupac, and we all know how that ended. And a lot of people think that it might've been P Diddy that did that, or at least called the shots to have that done. But at 24, you don't know shit about business.
How are you going to create the largest record label, especially while you're doing all this shit on the side, partying like crazy? But essentially what it was, is that he had a weird relationship with this music executive, who essentially groomed him and helped him to create this, record label. Now the guy that groomed him into creating this record label that was fond of P.
Diddy at just the age of 24 to help him create the world's one of the world's most successful rap labels ever also seemed to have some interesting ties to three letter government agencies. Now that starts to become weird when you find out that all of the rooms were rigged with video cameras and that he was Potentially dealing in a honeypot scheme to get blackmail on celebrities on music artists, right?
On politicians that he had over to these house parties that he just so frivolously threw in his face just to try to get him to have sex with him, right? Now, Fahim Mohammed is Fahim Mohammed has his own interesting ties to law enforcement and three other agencies. Fahim Mohammed has no real background in security, right?
There's no reason that he should have this job. But what he does have is an interesting tie to the Wharton school of business that he spoke at several times in the Wharton school of business, much like Yale has some very serious history in as being a recruitment area for the CIA. So when you look at You know, Ghislaine Maxwell's tied ties with the Mossad.
You look at P. Diddy's ties with potentially these high level record executives in this bodyguard who has ties with the CIA. It all starts to become a little bit clearer as we move from page 27 to page 33. We'll see if there's anything between now and then, but it is most interesting once you start to learn.
Oh, and here right in the P. Diddy. Paperwork right in the lawsuit paperwork against P Diddy. There is a side by side comparison photo of P Diddy and his girlfriend slash, you know, handler, Christina Karam and Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, right? Jeffrey Epstein being, you know, handled by Ghislaine Maxwell associated with the Mossad and P Diddy sitting here in this picture with Christina Karam.
Now, Christina. In this, actually, Christina was basically responsible for making sure that every one of his employees from the butlers to the chef, the housekeepers all walked around with a pouch or a fanny pack filled with drugs, cocaine, GHB, ecstasy, marijuana, gummies, Tucci, which is a combination of ecstasy and cocaine.
It said that, here's the, here's the comparison. It says, according to Mr. Jones, during the 13 months he lived and traveled with Mr. Combs, he witnessed Mr. Combs display and distribute guns from his bedroom closet in Miami, Florida, Los Angeles, California, the questionable individuals dressed in all black.
Hmm, that's interesting. And the title of this situation that says defendant Christina Karam is the Ghislaine Maxwell to Sean Combs Jeffrey Epstein, which is a interesting, like subtle hint at the association of circumstances, right? The Epstein style situation, the recordings, the blackmail scheme, all of it.
Very, very interesting that there's that side by side comparison. There's a point in this that they actually call it out a second time talking about how it could be even worse than what Jeffrey Epstein was doing. According to these legal documents, it says while living and traveling with Mr. Combs, Mr.
Jones discovered that P. Diddy had hidden cameras in every room of his homes. Every room of every home P. Diddy owned was rigged with video cameras. It says that P Diddy possesses compromising footage of every person that has attended his freak off parties and his house parties. Upon information and belief due to this treasure trove of evidence that he has in his possession, P Diddy believes that he is above the law and is untouchable because of the amount of blackmail that this man has.
It says that Jose Cruz is his IT director and is the gatekeeper to all of his recordings. It says that he stays out of the camera and from social media and the internet due to all of the incriminating acts he is required to record for P. Diddy. Wow. Now, As we move into the latter of the situation, You can start to put this together a little bit.
So P Diddy would have these huge, massive house parties and freak off parties where he would invite celebrities, politicians, music artists, all of those people to his home. He would then drug them and bring in prostitutes and underage individuals, minors to his home to then go off with these celebrities, with these politicians, with these musicians.
And then he would have blackmail on all of them. Meanwhile, with his. Super weird and nefarious associations with individuals who seem to have ties with three letter agencies. Doesn't seem like he's doing all of this just for his own right. Even if so, you could probably very easily have a, a trove of blackmail information, which is what literally it says here.
And sell it off to the highest bidder when needed, right? Crazy, crazy situation here. It said that she, let's see, I want to find the situation here where it talks about how it compares the again, one more time to Jeffrey Epstein. Because in the legal documentation here, it says that what Jeffrey Epstein P Diddy is doing is even worse, even worse than what Jeffrey Epstein was doing.
And I don't know how that is even potentially possible, but that's what it's saying here. So let's see if I can find that highlighted portion. And then we'll close it out pretty close to there. Let's see. Maybe I can control F this
Epstein. Let's look for that. Okay, so page 57. Hmm. Okay. Well, guess not. So, but I do know that it's in here somewhere. I'm not going to sift through these 73 pages for you. But I do have it highlighted in this documentation that shows that the legal representation for this man who's suing is P Diddy says that what P Diddy is doing with underage minors and his sex trafficking is worse than what Jeffrey Epstein is doing.
Here's your quick synopsis. P Diddy was running a sex trafficking honeypot scheme for celebrities, politicians, and music artists. He shot multiple people, one of them in the face in 1999 after being given a gun by J Lo, another one recently in 2023, just like seven months ago in his studio, got off all, all times.
Every single time he got off. Well, why? Why? Well, it seems like he got off because he has blackmail on all these politicians, on judges, on law enforcement agents, on, you know, all of these individuals, all of these celebrities, all of these politicians. He has blackmail on everybody in L. A. He runs L. A. with all this blackmail.
He is the, P. Diddy is the Epstein of Hollywood. Right. Epstein would do it with scientists and politicians and high level elites and all of those people with big money, right? He's the big money player. P Diddy is doing it to all the rappers, all of the musicians, all the artists. He has all these ties with the same people that Justin Bieber was caught up with, and you've seen them, what, what Justin Bieber's talked about in the past, like all of that, not only that, but he said he was going to eat this dude's face.
And then he tried to traffic him to Cuba Gooding Jr. What the fuck kind of world do we live in? Like, this is the deep dark shit that we're talking about, and this didn't even get into the serious details of the sex trafficking of minors. Right, but this is absolutely a honeypot scheme to create blackmail against famous celebrities, politicians, and music artists in LA, in Miami, and on some weird island in the Virgin Islands, like Epstein 2.
0, only worse, according to the legitimate legal document that states just that. Crazy, crazy situation. And with that. That's all I got. Thank you guys for listening. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart. I will keep you updated on all of these wild situations. Head down to the show notes right now.
Click the presale for Ronin. Support me. I appreciate you. I love you from the bottom of my heart. Go check it out. Get yours right now. Backpack. If you get all three, there's a 10 percent lifetime discount code that I'll send to you directly. Okay, so I appreciate you. I love you. Go ahead. Go there right now, hit that button right in the show notes and join the presale.
And I hope you have a wonderful day.
Adams Archive.
-
Welcome to The Adams Archive, a thought-provoking podcast that delves into the nexus of journalism, politics, and societal dynamics. Each episode aims to dissect the intricate layers of today’s most pressing issues, from the ethical dilemmas faced by journalists to the evolving landscape of global politics and the personal tribulations of public figures. With a keen eye on the implications of legal developments and the ever-changing digital domain's impact on free speech, The Adams Archive offers listeners a comprehensive understanding of the forces shaping our world.
Summary of Discussion Topics:
Journalism and Ethics: Navigate the challenging terrain of journalistic integrity, exploring the responsibilities of media professionals in an era of global connectivity and political tension.Political Dynamics: From legal battles over election eligibility to the intricacies of global diplomacy, get an in-depth look at the mechanisms driving contemporary politics.Societal Issues: Tackle the complexities of societal responsibility, legal precedents, and the collective quest for justice and understanding in the face of tragedy.Digital Discourse: Examine the critical role of digital platforms in shaping public discourse, highlighting the delicate balance between censorship and freedom of expression.Cultural Reflections: Reflect on the impact of cultural controversies, understanding how personal actions of public figures resonate within the broader societal context.Dive deeper into the narratives that define our times by subscribing to The Adams Archive. Follow us on our journey across platforms like YouTube and Substack, and join our vibrant social media community to engage in meaningful discussions. Your support helps us bring nuanced insights to the forefront, fostering a well-informed and engaged global community.
All the Links:
Connect with us and access all our content through https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams. Here, you'll find links to our episodes, articles, and ways to engage with our community. The Adams Archive is your portal to understanding the complexities of the modern world, inviting you to think critically, question freely, and explore deeply.
Full TranscriptionAdam's Archive. Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the 100th episode of the Adams archive. I appreciate you for being here so much. And I'm so thankful that I get to do this here for you guys. So again, thank you for being here. I'm so excited about what's to come for the Adams archive. I'm Happy with what it's been so far, but we have much more work to do.
So happy 100th episode to all of you, all of the listeners, all of the audience, all of those who have supported any of my shows, appreciated any of the topics that I've discussed, whatever it is you rock. You're awesome. Thank you for being a part of this. I appreciate it from the bottom of my heart.
Let's go.
And I think that's the first time that I've ever used a soundboard. So if you're new here, just know that you'll probably never hear that again. But thank you so much for being here. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart. And I love doing this for you guys. So let's go ahead and jump into it. On today's episode, we're going to be discussing some pretty wild topics.
So the one being that Tucker Carl is actually going to be releasing an interview with Vladimir Putin, which if you know my stance on this stuff, I think that's incredible. That's called journalism. Who'd have thought there was still some real journalists around, but as a result of this, he's gotten tons and tons of negative, feedback, both from the UK, potentially sanctioning him from being put on an NGO list, which some people are calling a kill list in Ukraine, uh, some pretty wild stuff.
So we will discuss all of that along with listening to the video by Tucker discussing the interview that he's going to be releasing. Then we're going to segue into another topic, which is the fact that Bill A bill in Hawaii could actually be the next state to boot Trump from the ballot, and we will discuss that.
After that, we're going to move into the situation that is actually going down with Prince Charles. Now King Charles, in his short reign, and he has been diagnosed with a life threatening disease. So we'll look back at some of the things that have occurred, and then we'll also talk about what would happen if King Charles himself, Mr.
Sausage Fingers, if you recall those photos that came out, were to pass away. So we'll look at that. Following that, that will move us into a discussion that will be our main topic for today, that we will be doing a deep dive on, which is the Oxford, Michigan shooter's mom has received a jury verdict for her alleged part defense.
In the murder of the four children that her son committed. And now you must be saying, like, did she kill them? What, what, what happened here that you would be doing a deep dive on this? And what I would say to you, when you ask that question, is that This is setting the wildest legal precedence that I have seen in my time of life and we'll jump into that.
What happened during the shooting, what his mom's part allegedly was in this for her to deserve a potential sentencing of 60 years. So stick around the longer you're here, the deeper we get. All right. So if you're new here, thank you so much. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart. Go ahead and hit that subscribe button.
If you are not new here, and even if you are new here for our hundredth episode, I just ask you, I know right now, how many reviews are in the Apple podcast and Spotify area. And it would take five seconds out of your day if you could just go there right now and leave a five star review. You don't even have to write anything.
I'm not gonna do that to ya. But if you want to, it would be pretty cool. Pretty cool. If you wanna get a little bit of good karma in your heart. It's one of the easiest things you can do throughout your day today. That's going to impact somebody that you know, and love positively. And all you have to do is go into Apple podcasts or Spotify, leave a five star review.
You can write something nice. If you like, tell me your favorite episode out of the first 100 episodes that we've done, but we have many more to come. So hit that subscribe button, leave a five star review and let's jump into it.
The Adams archive.
Alright, so the very first topic that we're going to discuss today is Tucker Carlson interviewed Vladimir Putin and the world is erupting in either positive or negative feedback for Tucker Carlson and some are going as far as entire nations trying to step up to the plate of stifling free speech and making sure that something like this, freedom of speech, never happens again.
Pretty wild stuff. So, here is the video. Let's go ahead and watch that first of Tucker Carlson preempting his interview. He got all of this backlash, and so he felt it was needed to come out and have a discussion about it. We're in Moscow to interview Vladimir Putin. Now I would say, in today's world, in the, the coal mine that is American journalism, the only canary, the only voice of reason, the only light within the tunnel.
It's Tucker Carlson. I cannot think of another mainstream, high, uh, high, uh, I don't know what the word is, high visibility journalist would even compare to Tucker Carlson. He is the man, the man for a reason, they kicked him out for a reason. Because he was just not playing by the playbook of the, the Murdochs and the, the rich elite of the world that owned the companies that he had to play on.
But guess what? Tucker Carlson realized something. Bitch, this is 2024. I don't need to be on cable news. In fact, it would be much better for my career and my pocketbook. If I wasn't. So he moved to Axe, releases every one of his podcasts and interviews on Axe. He'll be doing the same with this one. He'll also be releasing it, I believe, on Rumble.
And Rumble has been one of the only platforms that said, We will not stifle this at all. So has Elon Musk. So thank God for those two platforms, because they're one of the only places left for freedom of speech. So let's, let's, let's hear it from his mouth. And let's discuss it after that. Here we go.
Warren in Moscow Tonight. We're here to interview the president of Russia. Vladimir Putin will be doing that soon. There are risks to conducting an interview like this, obviously, so we've thought about it carefully over many months. Here's why we're doing it. First, because it's our job. We're in journalism.
Our duty is to inform people. Two years into a war that's reshaping the entire world, most Americans are not informed. They have no real idea what's happening in this region, here in Russia or 600 miles away in Ukraine. But they should know. They're paying for much of it, in ways they might not fully yet perceive.
The war in Ukraine is a human disaster. It's left hundreds of thousands of people dead, an entire generation of young Ukrainians. And it's depopulated the largest country in Europe. But the long term effects are even more profound. This war has utterly reshaped the global military and trade alliances.
And the sanctions that followed have as well. And in total, they have upended the world economy. The post World War II economic order, the system that guaranteed prosperity in the West for more than 80 years, is coming apart very fast, and along with it the dominance of the U. S. dollar. These are not small changes, they are history altering developments.
They will define the lives of our grandchildren. Most of the world understands this perfectly well, they can see it. Ask anyone in Asia or the Middle East what the future looks like. And yet the populations of the English speaking countries seem mostly unaware. They think that as nothing has really changed.
And they think that because no one has told them the truth. Their media outlets are corrupt. They lie to their readers and viewers. And they do that mostly by omission. For example, since the day the war in Ukraine began, American media outlets have spoken to scores of people from Ukraine, and they have done scores of interviews with Ukrainian President Zelensky.
We ourselves have put in a request for an interview with Zelensky, and we hope he accepts. But the interviews he's already done in the United States are not traditional interviews. They are fawning pep sessions specifically designed to amplify Zelensky's demand that the U. S. enter more deeply into a war in Eastern Europe and pay for it.
That is not journalism. It is government propaganda, propaganda of the ugliest kind, the kind that kills people. At the same time our politicians and media outlets have been doing this, promoting a foreign leader like he's a new consumer brand, not a single Western journalist has bothered to interview the president of the other country involved in this conflict, Vladimir Putin.
Most Americans have no idea why Putin invaded Ukraine, or what his goals are now. They've never heard his voice. That's wrong. Americans have a right to know all they can about a war they're implicated in. And we have the right to tell them about it because we are Americans too. Freedom of speech is our birthright.
We were born with the right to say what we believe. That right cannot be taken away no matter who is in the White House. But they're trying anyway. Almost three years ago, the Biden administration illegally spied on our text messages and then leaked the contents to their servants in the news media. They did this in order to stop a Putin interview that we were planning.
Last month, we're pretty certain they did exactly the same thing once again. But this time, we came to Moscow anyway. We are not here because we love Vladimir Putin. We are here because we love the United States, and we want it to remain prosperous and free. We paid for this trip ourselves. We took no money from any government or group, nor are we charging people to see the interview.
It is not behind a paywall. Anyone can watch the entire thing, shot live to tape and unedited, on our website, tuckercarlson. com. Elon Musk, to his great credit, has promised not to suppress or block this interview. once we post it on his platform, X, and we're grateful for that. Western governments, by contrast, will certainly do their best to censor this video on other, less principled platforms because that's what they do.
They are afraid of information they can't control. But you have no reason to be afraid of it. We are not encouraging you to agree with what Putin may say in this interview, but we are urging you to watch it. You should know as much as you can. And then, like a free citizen and not a slave, You can decide for yourself.
Thanks.
So quite a bit to unpack there. The first one being that he said that Americans don't seem to understand the implications of what is going on within this war. And I actually agree with him on this. And I say actually, because why wouldn't I? But I agree with him on this completely. The Americans don't understand the implications of this war.
Americans don't just think that we're like sending phony money over to Ukraine that has no effect on us. But there's a lot more difficulties that will arise from this in the future. One being that The brick has come out of this. The brick has become much stronger than that. Not a brick, like what you create your house out of.
Uh, but a brick is in the allegiance or the alliance between the world's superpowers that we are not a part of that being India, China. Russia, all of those countries that have tremendous influence, much of it economically in the world. And up until this point, the U. S. dollar has always been the standard of trade.
And there has been many alliances that have come out of this war that have shifted that. And when you see the three biggest superpowers behind the United States, Russia, China, And India all moving closer and closer together and starting to push us out of that conversation in the US dollar for you to think that that's not going to affect you is naive at best.
And so that's what he's discussing there. And I think he's right in saying that the US citizens don't really understand the implications of this because it's going to be not just the next coming years, not the next 234 years. This is the. Potential downfall of the um, not just the U. S. dollar, but the U. S.
in general from power. And that's a huge issue, obviously, for everybody. Our economic standings, our political standings, our military standings, all of it. Like, if you think about who are the U. S. 's biggest allies. Well, you have the UK, you have, I mean, like there's there's very few countries that you can point to that are the of the scale and power of just those three countries in and of themselves, right?
There's, there's countries Very few. I can't even think of another one that would, that every one of them that we're in an alliance with almost pales in comparison to those three countries. And so, that's a huge piece of this. The next piece of it saying that everybody has flocked. The post war war.
Flocked. to interview Zelensky. Everybody has, has gotten on their knees right in front of the man and let him just preach and preach and preach to the American people, propping him up as if he's not a five foot six comedian who wears leather pants and dances in front of everybody. And so they've, they've propped him up.
They've tried to make him seem like this bigger than life figure. And all that man has done is gotten on his knees and begged, pleaded. Cried to the American people for more and more of your money. Why? Why? Well, we all are starting to put the two pieces together with Ukraine's, one of the most corrupt places in the world.
Crane's one of the, the places where a lot of the, uh, bio labs that nobody wanted to admit were real are conducting horrendous types of experiments. On behalf of the, and commissioned by the United States of America, the Ukraine is where Hunter Biden and his father, the big guy, funneled millions of dollars into their family's portfolios.
So, there's a lot more going on here, and there's a lot more reasons that we have interest in Ukraine, and not we as in the American people, but we as in the political elite class within America. It generally comes down to, who'd have thought, money. It's not that they're trying to protect democracy.
Ukraine isn't, isn't even a democracy. The very first opportunity that Zelensky had, Zelensky was trying to Stifle his opponents, trying to get rid of them, trying to imprison them, trying to stop them from being able to compete against him during this time of war. That's not a democracy. That's authoritarianism.
It's obvious. So all these news medias have flocked to try and interview this man, flocked to try and take government money to go over there, have these conversations with Zelensky so he can plead and beg for more and more of your money. Not like we have a choice in the matter. Anyways. But another great point by him.
And so as we move more and more into this, he talks about how the government actually surveilled and put out news articles, say, like, going after Tucker Carlson for even having the audacity to interview Vladimir Putin. Not even for doing it, but for even Thinking about having a conversation with him and he's right in saying that there hasn't been any conversations at all with Vladimir Putin.
I have been reporting on Vladimir Putin and what's happening in Russia by going to the Russia Kremlin website and pulling the transcripts. From Vladimir Putin's speeches that he's given on the U. S., and I hope you've heard those, and if you haven't, go back and, you know, just look through the podcast archives of, uh, look for World War III, you'll see a few of them, where I've actually read the transcripts from Vladimir Putin calling out the West for eroding the nuclear family, calling out the West for not even knowing what a man and a woman is, calling, just completely embarrassing us, rightfully, and that's it.
Saying that you know giving the exact breakdown of the reason that he's he's doing the things that he's doing which Again, I like that Tucker Carlson said I'm not trying to convince you to agree with him I just want you to hear his opinion because that's what journalism is Journalism shouldn't be skewed one way or the other journalism should expose corruption within governmental institutions and corporations Journalism should offer you the the facts and the data and offer you and afford you the opportunity to be able to hear out Both sides and that's what he did here He tried to interview Zelensky and he tried and it did successfully interview Putin and so very very happy to see that this is happening and as a result of this as Expected, you know, he said with the very beginning of this is it's quite the dangerous quite a dangerous endeavor To be able to do so and I can't imagine the amount of threats that Tucker Carlson got as a result of this from very powerful Individuals and people
So, from this, there has been a ton of backlash from several different places. The first one being that the European Union has said that they are seeking sanctions and a travel ban against Tucker Carlson for his interview with Putin. Now, this comes from Brian Krasenstein on Twitter, and it says, I've never thought I would be defending Tucker Carlson as much.
So much within a period of a couple days, but once again, if you support freedom, then you support Tucker's right to interview Putin, just like many others have in the past, right? When you, when you go back, you see that there's been handfuls of, of journalists who have gone over and interviewed Vladimir Putin, but it's only now that you, there's an unspeakable, uh, unspoken rule that you can't go interview the subject of one of the largest military conflicts that have happened in the last, Sixty years.
So. If, if the, all of the people around you, don't, don't, don't talk to him, don't talk to him, you better not talk to him, if you speak to him, we're gonna have a huge problem, right, it's gonna make you start to question, well, why, why, what is your vested interest in me not speaking to this person, right, if you understand, like, when you think of, uh, abusive spouses, When you think of abusive parents or abusive friends, people who have psychopathic and sociopathic tendencies, the thing that they like to do is they like to isolate you.
They like to put you into a bubble that they can then create the environment around, they can create the reality that you live within. And they want to isolate you away from people who pop that bubble. They want to keep you away from people who would, who would question your reality in a way that would prompt you to do the same.
And, and, that's exactly what we're seeing here. The, the authoritarian government, that is the United States government, as well as the European Union, are trying to, they don't even want you to have a conversation with Vladimir Putin. They don't even want you to hear his side of things because What if it's reasonable?
What if what he's, the reason that he's going into this war actually has some merit to it? What if his criticisms of the West, what if his criticisms of the United States actually have value to them? What if we agree with a lot of the opinions of Vladimir Putin? Well, they don't want you to know. They have, they want you to stay in, in your little corner of silence and never hear from the man himself.
And again, I'm not saying that that's what it is, in that you're going to agree with everything Vladimir Putin says. I think if you go back and listen to some of the interviews and transcripts that I've read of Vladimir Putin, that a lot of the things that he's said is very reasonable. A lot of the criticisms that he has of the West are very reasonable.
And I think that's what they're afraid of here. Otherwise, why would a U. S. ally go to the lengths of saying that the single most visible and successful journalist within the United States probably ever Will no longer be able to visit their country. This is what this is. This is pressure. This is mafia style pressure on Tucker to not release the video, to not release the interview.
They don't want him to release this interview, but again. You have to reverse engineer that and go, okay, why wouldn't they want this interview to be released? Right? Why wouldn't they want their reality to be challenged if they're correct? It's the same thing that we see with the left. They don't want you to have a conversation about these things because they know when their argument is challenged that it very quickly falls apart.
The, the picture that they've created, the, the character. Caricature that they've created of Vladimir Putin will crumble the second that the largest journalist, the most successful journalist in the world, has a conversation with him. And all they're, they're, they're terrified of that caricature. Crumbling.
Because then what? What is, what's gonna happen if really, if people start to realize that these things that he is doing or saying are somewhat reasonable? That these criticisms are somewhat reasonable? That's what they're afraid of. Otherwise, why would they be going to these lengths? Right, it says, I'm sure much of what Putin will say will be lies, embellishments, and inaccuracies.
Well, why do you say that? Well, probably because you've been told to think that. Putin is the one. who should be sanctioned further, not an American who is asking Putin questions. The risks of this interview for Tucker shouldn't be sanctions from U. S. allies, is what this says. And I agree. I believe this guy is even a, uh, Democrat that is posting this, so surprising, but good, good.
Something we can agree on is the fact that free speech shall not be stifled. It is an American right. It is a God given right. It is a A right to humanity as a whole to be able to speak the words that they wish to speak without it being stopped by another human. And this leads us to the next part of this.
An absolute hit piece from CNN, where the anchor almost goes into tears talking about Tucker Carlson and his interview with Vladimir Putin. Here we go. We interview the president of Russia, Vladimir Putin. Tucker Carlson is lying from the streets of Russia, no less. Not a single Western journalist has bothered to interview the president of the other country involved in this conflict, Vladimir Putin.
That's a lie. Serious news outlets, including CNN, have requested Putin to interview over and over again. Most Americans have no idea why Putin invaded Ukraine, or what his goals are now. They've never heard his voice. Another lie. Serious news outlets, including CNN, have covered and, of course, reported on Putin's words since this war began, including one of his baseless justifications for the invasion of Ukraine, which he initially claimed was to stop the Nazis.
First, because it's our job. We're in journalism. Tucker Carlson is not a journalist. Not even close. And his former employer, in a court case, actually agreed. Quote, The general tenor of the show should then inform a viewer that Carlson is not stating actual facts about the topics he discusses, and is instead engaging in exaggeration and non literal commentary.
Two years into a war that's reshaping the entire world, most Americans are not informed. They have no real idea what's happening in this region, here in Russia or 600 miles away in Ukraine. For two years, real journalists have risked their lives to report.
That lady can barely even speak. I don't know why she's a news anchor, probably because it's the best that CNN could afford at this point with their, I don't know, 100, 000 viewers. I don't know what's more comical in that video. Is that news anchor about to be in tears or the fact that she twice called CNN a serious news organization and then tried to delegitimize Tucker Carlson for what?
For what? Getting the interview that she allegedly put in for that she didn't get? How funny and then to say that it's it's misinformation or that anything that has to do with the Nazi problem in Ukraine being unfounded. Right? Go, go look at the Azov regime, right? Like, this is absolutely fact that there is Nazis in Ukraine.
Fact! You can, you cannot argue that any other way. And, and so, it's just so funny. You see hippies after hippies coming out. Then there was, uh, This, which came out as well, which was a article, which says that Tucker Carlson on Ukraine NGO, Miro Travis kill list after his Putin interview, and it says Twitter claims fact checked American journalist, Tucker Carlson has been placed on the Ukrainian NGO, my orchard vets.
Kill list. Social media has come out in support of Carlson with users calling Ukraine president Vladimir Zelensky a dictator for using a Kiev based doxing website grossly nicknamed Peacemaker against Carlson following his interview with Russia's Vladimir Putin. And it has a screenshot from it there.
Read Ukrainian or whatever they speak. Um, but it says American journalist, Tucker Carlson has been placed on this kill list. My ultra vets is a Ukrainian Kiev based website that publishes a running list and sometimes personal information of people who are considered by authors of the website to be enemies of Ukraine, or as the website itself States, whose actions have signs of crimes against the national security of Ukraine, peace, human security, and the inter national law.
Although it has no official status, the website is regularly consulted at checkpoints to integrate government information systems. Social media has come out in support of Carlson with users calling Ukrainian president Zelensky a dictator for using a Kiev based doxing website. On Tuesday, Tucker Carlson, previously of Fox News, hinted at an upcoming interview with, uh, Russian President Putin.
This interview marks the first time a Western journalist has spoken with Putin since Russia's invasion of Ukraine nearly two years ago. The Kremlin confirmed on Wednesday that the interview indeed occurred. They stated that Carlson's stance was not in favor of Ukraine or Russia, but rather leaned towards being pro Ukraine.
American. An interview of Carlson's, uh, of Carlson's page on the website quickly went viral on social media, but the claims were sued and fact checked by other people online. It was revealed that his name had been put up on the so called kill list way back in June of 2023, proving that it had nothing to do with his interview with Putin.
Fair. Carlson is a well known conservative media figure, critical of the West's backing of Ukraine. He has also previously expressed support for Putin. The 54 year old journalist visits, uh, to the Ukraine Capitol has been. Or, I'm sorry, to the Russian capital has been thoroughly covered by local media reporting on his every move.
There are risks to doing an interview like this, Tucker Carlson said. Carlson mentioned that the commencement of the conflict in Ukraine, Western journalists have conducted numerous interviews with Zelensky, whom he repeatedly called a dictator. However, according to Carlson, these interviews are biased and Zelensky's advocacy for increasing U.
S. involvement in the conflict. Carlson labeled them as fawning pep sessions and criticized them for being propaganda. Because they are. Interesting. So, it's interesting to note, what they said there is that, Oh, oh, this happened back in June. This has nothing to do with his interview today. But, as Tucker Carlson stated, he was actually trying to interview Putin.
Right around that time. I forget the time frame that he said in there, but right around that same exact time, he also said that he went to go interview him. But he had all this backlash, so he decided not to. They were, they were bugging his phone. All of this stuff. So, there you have it. That's what's going on with Tucker Carlson.
Now, according to some reports that I saw, Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin could come out as soon as, well, if you're listening to this on Thursday, February 8th of 2024, today. And I'm recording this the day before that, Wednesday evening, uh, the 7th. And so, if that is the case, You all know I'm gonna listen to it and you better to go listen to it It'll be at X on X or on rumble I'm sure it'll be on Tucker Carlson's website as well And then I'll do a breakdown for you guys because that is a very very interesting interview that will occur Alright, there you have it.
There's the backlash. There's Tucker Carlson. This moves us into our next situation, which is that Hawaii could be the very next state to boot Trump from the ballot as they continue to try to find legal loopholes to make sure that your vote is not heard. And it says Hawaii bill to ban candidates for insurrection passes first hearing. So again, is Hawaii going to become the second state now to utilize a, a, the 14th amendment, which was passed to stop Confederate leaders who literally started a, a, a war within our country to overthrow the government?
To be used on somebody who caused a, and I can't even say caused, right? Like the, the, the, there's so many problems with this, but let's, let's go ahead and take a look. It says Hawaii bill to ban candidates for insurrection passes first hearing. It says a bill that could bar former president Donald Trump from appearing in November's Hawaii election ballots received considerable pushback Tuesday from his supporters, some of whom came to the state Capitol dressed in patriotic wear.
Senate bill 2390. Two, in Hawaii, introduced by State Senator Karl Rhoades, passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which Rhoades chairs, during its initial hearing. It could exclude political candidates who are disqualified by a constitutional or statutory provision. Trump's name does not appear on the bill, but his supporters invoked his name repeatedly during the hearing.
Yeah, obviously it's aimed at him. What? Alexandria Lum, a native of Hawaii and woman, said, We all know what this bill is about, and it's about one person in particular. Rhodes told the Honolulu Star advertiser. After the hearing, that Trump has been indicted for his activities on January 6th and leading up to it.
So it's hard to ignore the elephant in the room. Yeah, this, what, are they trying to say that it's not about him? Like, that makes literally no sense. If Joe Biden participates in an insurrection, it would apply to him too, Rhodes said. And nobody participated in an insurrection, you Idiot, there was no insurrection.
Nobody's been charged for insurrection. Nobody's been indicted for insurrection. Nobody's going to jail for insurrection There's been no single charge that has occurred. That is a insurrection charge in the last four years at all period yet there's trying to pass this this Ridiculous idea that that trump tried to overthrow the government what?
You know, remember the post that he posted on Twitter that got taken down where he was telling everybody to be peaceful and be nice to the police?
There was no inciting of an insurrection. There was no insurrection. It was a bunch of old geriatrics walking through the Capitol building, being provoked by law enforcement officials, hidden as as patriotic individuals, telling them exactly where to go and what to do so that they could plan this. All along, this was a ace in the hole for the democratic party.
This was an ace in the hole for the FBI and the CIA, which should just be obliterated just as Trump and John F. Kennedy have talked about these, these powerful countries within our country that have unchecked power and unknown, ungodly amounts of money. To me, this was all planned. They planted upwards of more than 50, I think somebody said hundreds of federal, of FBI agents within the audience of January 6, so that they could provoke this to happen so that they could do this exact, this was a strategic move for them so that one by one states could try to utilize and leverage this.
Two 300 year old law that was utilized against Confederate generals who caused a civil war, a legitimate civil war where brothers fought brothers, mothers cared for the wounded of individuals who were two states away while they died in their arms. Like it's, it's the, the 14th amendment was not meant to be utilized in this way.
And it's literally a legal loophole, just like they're trying to pin the other 91. Uh, indictments against Trump on is whatever in any way, shape or form that they can weaponize the judicial system against Trump and against you and against anybody else who speaks out against the government. They will, as long as it suits their agenda.
It says in written testimony, this bill not only restricts Donald Trump from the ballot, but also prohibits the electors and elect. Alternates from voting for their candidate. She said that bias and hate for Trump aren't good reasons to change our u. s. Constitution Rhodes told the star advertiser that most people believe the u.
s. Constitution should be followed including age and residency requirements and other like regulations under the 14th amendment section 3 of the 14th amendment states that a person who has taken an oath to support the u. s. Constitution and becomes involved in insurrection cannot hold government Office.
I'm confident the opinion expressed by the MAGAGARS is not the majority opinion in Hawaii, Rhodes said. Michael Golda, Judge, testified to the Stonewall Caucus of the Democratic Party in Hawaii in support of SB 2392. It's something that should have been in the books already, he said. You violate the Constitution.
You do insurrections. You attack our government. You do not get to be on the ballots and run our government. Okay, Abby Simmons, co chair to the Legislative Committee of the Democratic Party of Hawaii, also testified in support. We believe government officials should be held to the highest ethical standards as required by Article 14 of the Hawaii State Constitution.
Yeah, well maybe if they're, you know, involved in Chinese financial scandals, maybe they shouldn't either. Maybe we should invoke the amendment on that. Oh wait, we won't because we're not as low as this, this craziness. As to try to, to legally weaponize the judicial system against, well, illegally weaponize the judicial system against our political opponents, just like they do in Maoist China, just like they do in, in any other authoritarian state.
state, North Korea, right? Like this, it is so crazy and so saddening how far our, our government has fallen. Like not only it's, it's like, it's like if you, if you were in a situation where you're, you thought the world of your, your parents and your https: otter. ai Transcripts provided by Transcription Outsourcing, LLC.
It's like that's what that's what's happened to our government in my eyes is like I was such a patriot I was I was so somebody who was so patriotic and so pro america and so pro You know like freedom of speech and all the the the constitutional amendments and nothing could do you know? Like our forefathers and and the way that they wrote this is incredible And I don't disagree with that today that our Constitution was Written correctly and I don't disagree that we are the greatest nation in the world today I absolutely believe that but I do believe that our government has been hijacked by a bunch of people who want nothing but for our Constitution our government to crumble around us for their own power and money grab This goes on to say the Democratic Party of Hawaii said in the written testimony They believe citizens deserve the right to clean and transparent elections where public servants meet the requirements of the United States and state of Hawaii constitutions Yeah, whatever.
Alright, um,
Just trying to see if there's anything of value here. Interesting. This is the only way that they think they can beat them now. Because they already played their election, uh, little BS that they did last year, or last election, with the mail in ballots, with the overnight changes in votes, with the, you know, all the things that happened there.
And this is their ace in the hole, is they're going to try and get them removed from the ballot. So that he candidate, you can't even vote for the candidate of your choice. Right? And this, this brought this up to me, which shows something from Reddit, which was a, a post that I just recently posted myself, which showed this.
It says 10 Wars and it has the past five presidents before Donald Trump. And then it goes on to show Donald Trump and it says Zero wars, right? So you have, you have Donald Trump with zero wars, you have the last five presidents with 10 wars, and then you have zero indictments. against the last five presidents and 91 indictments against Donald Trump.
And you have to ask yourself, why? Why? Because that's what they want. They want more. They want, they want us to be in conflict because that's what makes us money. They don't want peace, and when you threaten their money, they threaten you right back with the entire power of the United States government behind them.
And that should terrify every single one of you. And that's exactly what's going on in Hawaii, is they are weaponizing the justice system. Just like they did in the first state that did it. Because if they do it to Trump, what stops them from doing it from any other potential candidate in the future?
Weaponizing the judicial system so that you cannot vote for who you want to vote for. And I believe that our Democracy, our voting procedures, the way that we view voting as a country today, has shattered. Like, I don't believe in our voting system. I will still vote. I will, because based on principle, I don't believe that it should be as, as, Uh, you know, can't say the word, but as, as fixed as it is today, but it is, it's absolutely a, it's a, it's a game that you cannot win through sheer voting.
It is not a true democracy. A true democracy would take into consideration the votes, and there wouldn't be all of this political lobbying, and there wouldn't be this two party system, and there wouldn't be one candidate for each one of them, and it wouldn't be, it wouldn't be this big money game. If we were to re engineer politics in a way that was truly for the people, it wouldn't have to do with who could gain the most money from the most corporations to gain the most support by the institutions that could then control them later down the road.
That wouldn't be it. It would be who's the most intelligent, articulate, Caring individual that we see as being powerful in their speech and capable in their actions that we would want to represent us on a world stage. And then we vote. And each vote counted the same. I still don't absolutely believe in the electoral colleges the way it is outlined today.
But, that to me is a true democracy. We don't have a true democracy. We have, uh, corporatism is the current state of our government today. And that moves us on to our next thing, which is going to be a completely different government type, which doesn't seem to be too far off. You know, the, the, the Royal families in the United States today is the Royal Democratic family and the Royal Republican family.
And whoever those families fix the show enough so that their son or daughters or brothers or sisters or friends from down the road can get into those political positions and so be it. But the Royal bloodlines in the US is the Democrats and the Republicans. That's what it is. But when we look at Buckingham Palace, it's a little bit different, but not too far off.
Which brings us to our next segment, and that is the fact that King Charles has been diagnosed with cancer. And if we followed the news since his inauguration, or not his inauguration, his coronation, you would find that there was All sorts of questions surrounding his health at the time. There was a picture that came out that showed his fingers that looked like absolute kibossas in the packaging and, uh, it made you start to question it right away.
It says King Charles has been diagnosed with a form of cancer, says Buckingham Palace. It's not prostate cancer, but we as was discovered during a recent treatment for an enlarged prostate. The king began regular treatments on Monday and will postpone public duties during it. The palace said the monarch 75 remains wholly positive about his treatments and looks forward to returning to full public duty.
As soon as possible. No further details have been shared on the stage of cancer or prognosis. Charles informed both his sons personally about his diagnosis, and the Prince of Wales said to be in regular contact with his father. The Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry, who lives in the United States, spoke to his father and will be traveling to the UK to see him in the coming days.
The King returned to London from Sadringham in Norfolk on Monday morning, and Palace says that he has started treatment as an outpatient. Although he reposes public events, the king will continue his constitutional duties as role as head of the state, including paperwork and private meetings. It is understood that his weekly audiences with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will continue and will be in person unless doctors advise that he limits such.
Contact. Hmm. Now, this kind of brings us to the conversation of like, what would happen? Who would the, who would the crown go to? And that, of course, is Prince William. Prince William being the same Prince William that we'll get here to a second who had some controversies around his name just one year Ago.
Hmm. This goes on to say that Prince William has also temporarily withdrawn from public engagements while he helped his wife, Catherine, the princess of Wales, as she recovered from abdominal surgery she had last month. But it was announced earlier on on Monday that she would return to public duties later.
This week, the King was seen in the church service in Sadringham on Sunday, where he waved to crowds and walked for about 10 minutes. Don't see anything of value here. It says U. S. President Joe Biden expressed his concerns and said that he would speak to the King. In a post on X, he later said navigating a cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship takes hope and absolute courage.
Joe and I joined the people of the United States Kingdom in praying that His Majesty experiences a swift and full recovery. Mr. Biden's son, Beau, died of brain cancer at age 46, and his long term friend, Republican Senator John McCain, died of cancer in 2018. Charles acceded to the throne on his death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth, in September 2022.
Hmm. The King and Queen are scheduled to visit Canada in May in Australia, New Zealand, and Samoa. Interesting. The palace has yet to confirm whether the tours will go ahead, with no date suggested. There you have it. There's your prognosis. And what we find from this is that Prince William would be the one that would actually follow his reign.
And there's been some interesting controversies around Prince William. And here it is. This happened in 2022. And it says that it's been more than a week since social media exploded with astonishment, glee, and far too many memes involving royals bending over in their polo kit. Over a scandalous and unsubstantiated rumor involving Prince William, an alleged affair, and a sex act that rhymes with jegging?
Hmm. If you somehow missed the story, catch up here. Let's catch up there. Uh, it says this particular maelstrom was kicked up by a recent blind item tip via gossip account, Des Moines, but the regal tittle tattle around William and one of his And Kate's circle of countryside aristocrats, aka the Turnip Toffs, Rose Hanbury, has been doing the rounds since about the time those sprayed on jeans were in vogue.
This salacious story was a trending topic on Twitter for nearly two days, and while William and the Palace haven't officially responded to it, their unofficial relations motto of never complain never explain means that they almost never comment in stories like this. There has been some interesting content emerging that could be seen as indirect response to the maelstrom scandal that captured the internet's imagination for a wild 48 hours.
Very, very interesting. So let's see if we can find the check out this article as a response to this. And see what it was about, but I'm pretty sure you can use your wild imagination to figure out what rhymes with jegging that will tell you about the affair that he allegedly had, according to this article.
Um, so I don't know if we need to dive into that, but I thought that to be pretty funny and the very next in line for. The throne seems to have had an affair where he may have been on the receiving end of not only the drama, but potentially something else, uh, that rhymes with Bilbo Baggins, just the first part of that.
Um, okay, so this will segue us into our next conversation and that would be the fact. that there was a recent situation. Well, I guess Prince William responded to this situation about his father, and I don't really care to read it, but if you do, it's on Fox news. And the title of the article is Prince William break silence on Charles's cancer.
Who cares? All right. So this moves us on to our next situation, which is going to be the deep dive for the day, which is the fact. That a mother in Oakland County, Michigan was found guilty for involuntary manslaughter. And as I mentioned earlier, this is the most, by far, the craziest legal precedence being set that I have ever seen.
Which is the fact that now if your son or daughter commits a crime, you can be found guilty. Alongside of them. This is the first that I've ever heard of anything like this. There's very little case law that supports this. Nonetheless, I did want to walk through it with you because I find it to be very, very interesting.
So let's pull this up. Imagine living in a home where you keep your car keys. On a hook by the door. A common slight in many households, this says. The setup is all too familiar. Now let's say one day, while you're not paying attention, your teenager grabs those keys, takes the car for a spin, without your permission, and ends up causing an accident.
Suddenly the blame shifts to you for simply having the keys accessible at home, despite never actually handing them over. With the intention of letting your child drive unsupervised. This situation mirrors the complexities surrounding the Jennifer Crumbly case. It brings into focus the intricacies, intricacies that are dancing between trust, responsibility, and foreseeability.
Within the family unit, it questions the extent of parental liability for their children's actions, particularly when indirect access to potential harmful objects leads to unforeseen consequences. The discussion isn't just about who left the keys out, but about the broader implications of responsibility and control in a world where accidents happen.
Now, to be fair, it's not really an accident what happened. I, nonetheless, I do think it's interesting to point out the similarities between the situation. The legal case against Jenner, Jenny, Jennifer, Jenner, Jennifer, Jenny Crumbly, the mother of the Oxford high school shooter, Ethan Crumbly marked a significant and unprecedented event in the United States legal system.
Jennifer Crumbly was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the 2021 shooting carried out by by her son, which resulted in the deaths of four students. This verdict represents the first incidents in U. S. history where a parent has been charged and convicted in relation to a mass school shooting committed by their child.
Here are the key facts surrounding the case against Jennifer Crumbly, the mother of the son. In the Oxford school shooting now, let me give you some context on this because I think that's important understanding the totality and and the the concern surrounding this case. Now, this is not me sympathizing with this mother.
This is not me agreeing that she did everything right. This is not me saying that this is not me saying that this situation could have been could not have been prevented by proper parental duties being You Taken within this context, but it is me saying that this is a scary, absolutely terrifying legal precedence to set in today's world.
So, here's the situation. Ethan Crumbly, Oxford, Michigan. The shooting occurred on November 30th of 2021. michigan. Ethan crumbly k injured several others. T was a nine mm sig Sawyer father and given to Ethan gift. Ethan pleaded guilt murder and terrorism, ack in the shooting. He was s Of parole. Jennifer Crumbley, his mother, was charged with involuntary manslaughter in connection with the shooting, making a significant legal action as it pertains to parental responsibility and such incidents.
She was found guilty of the charges, making it a landmark case regarding culpability of parents, their children's actions when involved. When it involves access to firearms, prosecutors argued that Jennifer and her husband, James Crumbly, were grossly negligent by failing to secure the firearms and ignoring warning signs of Ethan's potential for violence.
Jennifer Crumbly's defense contended that she was not directly responsible for the actions of her son and that the tragedy was unforeseeable. As of the updates, she was charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter, 15 years. Each. Totaling 60 years in prison as a result of this. So to me, this is a pretty serious case law being, precedent being set for case law in the future.
Which is the fact that if your child does something wrong, should you be held legally liable as their parent? And I think that my, my response to that right off the cuff would be no, your child has their own decision making your child has their own terrible potential for violence, but that doesn't make you as the person who birthed them, or as the person who housed them responsible directly for their actions.
And, and so this could be used in, in so many ways. And it, it parallels to me. The authoritarian legal system that happens in North Korea. If you are found guilty of going against the North Korean government, they don't just punish you for the actions. They punish your parents. They punish your cousins.
They punish your entire lineage as the result of your actions. Whether justified or unjustified.
And so, are we going to start prosecuting every parent of every child under the age of 18 for every gang member under the age of 18, which again is one of the leading causes of gun violence in the country? Are we going to go after the parents of every individual? In Chicago, who's under the age of 18 who committed murder, are we gonna do that?
Hmm. Are we going to charge the parent of every child who committed theft? Are we going to charge the parent of every child who committed any crime at all? Because if this is the case law, if this is the precedent that we're setting, you have to go back to every single murder, every mass murder, every shooting, every, every beating, every assault charge, every, every shoplifting, every, every charge essentially ever and prosecute the parents.
But where does it stop? Why just the parents? Why not charge? I don't know, the gun manufacturer, which I'm pretty sure they've tried to do in several instances. Why not charge the government for enabling all of this? Why not charge the school? Why not charge the company that created the car that got him there?
Why not charge the company who made the clothes that he was wearing? This all seems ridiculous, because it is. A human is its own separate entity with its own decision making abilities, its own potential for doing massive amounts of good and great things in the world, and also massive amounts of evil and terrible things in this world.
The decisions of your child do not directly, legally, at least shouldn't legally reflect the decisions of the parents. This is a conversation of nature versus nurture. Does your child have its own thoughts, its own ability to take action outside of the rights or the, or the, the, uh, the, the governor that is set by the parents.
And so here are the different arguments. Let's give you an outline of the case. The prosecution argued that Jennifer Crumbly was grossly negligent for failing to secure the firearm and ammunition at home, thereby enabling her son's access to the gun. Okay.
But that's not a charge in and of itself. They didn't charge her with negligence when it comes to firearms. They charged her with involuntary manslaughter. They highlighted that she and her husband ignored warning signs of her son's violent tendencies and mental health issues. Okay. Fair. Pretty sure if I recall correctly that her son was hearing voices in his head and The school went to them about it, and they didn't seek psychiatric help.
Okay, that's fair, but I don't think that means that she murdered these children, at all. It was also noted that she failed to alert Oxford High School that the family owned guns, including the handgun used in the shooting. Okay, I own firearms, absolutely not going to call and alert my child's school as a result of that.
Like if I called my child's school and said, Hey, uh, just letting you know, I own firearms. I'm pretty sure they would call the police on me because they would seem like a threat. Um, so those are the arguments for the prosecution. The arguments for the defense was Jennifer Crumbly's defense argued that it was not, she was not responsible for buying or storing the gun used in the shootings.
True. They contended that there was no clear warning signs that her son could commit such a crime, asserting that the tragedy was unforeseeable. And the defense argued that it was her husband James Crumbly's responsibility to keep track of the gun and that Jennifer did not see signs of mental distress in Ethan that would require psychiatric intervention.
Okay, fair positions. So to me, it's like, how, how do you take that from, like, and how do you give this woman 60 years? There's people who have literally curb stomped somebody to death and are serving less time than that. Like, you're sentencing, you're just sentencing this woman to death because she's, what, 50 years old?
Like, 60 more years? You're sentencing her to death. Says rationale behind the verdict. The jury, which included gun owners and people familiar with firearms. Found Jennifer Crumbly guilty of involuntary manslaughter in all four counts, one for each student killed. The conviction was based on the argument that Jennifer Crumbly's negligence in storing firearms and ignoring her son's mental health and behavioral warning signs contributed significantly to the tragedy.
This case can be seen as a potential precedent for holding parents accountable for their roles in enabling their children's access to firearms in shootings. But it says specifically school shootings, but I'm not going to harp on that because if this is the case, you have to go back however many times and prosecute the parents.
Manslaughter in Michigan carries a penalty of up to 15 years in prison. Jennifer Crumbly's sentence was scheduled for April 9th, while James trial on similar charges was set to begin in March. This landmark case underscores the legal and moral responsibilities of gun ownership and parental oversight, especially concerning securing firearms and attentiveness to children's mental health needs.
Okay, so let's look at some of the philosophical arguments surrounding this. One argument of this, being the argument in defense for Jennifer, Well, let's do the other side first, the argument against Jennifer Crumbly. From a moral standpoint, parents have a duty to care for both their children and society.
This includes not only providing for their basic needs, but also ensuring they do not pose a danger to themselves or others. Virtue ethics, which focuses on the character and virtues of a moral agent, would suggest that part of being a good parent is instilling moral virtues in one's children and preventing foreseeable harm that they might cause.
The concept of negligence highlights a failure in this duty of care. If there were signs of Ethan's distress for potential violence, ethical theories like utilitarianism, maximizing well being, would argue, well, this is very specifically philosophical, not exactly what I was looking for, but nonetheless.
The argument for the moral autonomy and unpredictability would say that the argument from a standpoint of moral autonomy that individuals are primarily responsible for their own actions. Basically what I've said. Ethical theories like existentialism emphasize the importance of individual choice and personal responsibility.
In this view, Ethan Crumbly's actions, though tragic, were his own, making it morally problematic to hold Jennifer Crumbly responsible for the actions she did not directly commit. Yeah. The principle of unpredictability, and that really comes down to the word of involuntary manslaughter. Involuntary meaning that I didn't even myself commit this?
Like, that's probably the bigger legal situation that I would harp on if I was the legal counsel of this individual is like, I would attack the word involuntary. Involuntary does not mean I didn't do it. Like voluntary means I did it purposefully. Involuntary means I did it unpurposefully. Right? Like, then, then, then how far can you take it?
You want to talk about the butterfly effect? Like, you ever seen the movie The Butterfly Effect? It's like, How far can we stretch the word involuntary until it means not only the mom, not only the dad, but the cousins, and the grandparents, and the, the, the, the owner of the house that they lived in, and the manufacturer of the clothing that he wore, and the gun manufacturer, and the car manufacturer, and the wheels that were on the car at the time that he drove to school, and the school for being there, and the desk that he sat in for not, like, how far can you stretch the word involuntary?
Because to me, and if we look at like the legal, what is the legal definition of involuntary? Let's see if we can get an answer on that. But to me, you cannot convict somebody of something for involuntarily, by proxy, committing murder or manslaughter against somebody else when they weren't even within a mile of the situation that you were, that the murders were conducted in.
Right? Like, how can you say that? It's such a legal situation. Stretch to say that this woman was responsible for these children's death. And a terrifying legal precedent to set because then, as we talk about the judicial system being weaponized against anybody and everybody that's political opponents, right?
And again, this is like, this is a tragedy. This is horrible. The kid that is responsible for this got life in prison, as he should have. If not, he should have got the capital punishment as a result of this. I'm not against that in this situation. He pleaded guilty. He said it was me. It was obvious that it was him.
It was a horrific act. Tip for tat, eye for eye, let the guy rot in jail, or eliminate the, the, the burden on, on our tax dollars for taking care of him after this horrific and tragic, terrible act. But to, to, to take this to the parents and say, you did this, you are responsible for this legally, like morally, maybe.
Morally, maybe you should have stepped in. Morally, you should have taken your child to see a psychiatrist. Morally, you should have locked the guns away. Morally, you should have done this, and you should have done that, and you should have notified the school, and you should have done, like, morally, sure, make those arguments.
And if we're talking about a Twitter thread where everybody's shitting on this mom for all the things that she should have done, Sure. Morally, she should have done more. But to set a legal precedence, which says that she is now responsible for those children's deaths legally and needs to pay for it through time in prison until she dies?
Is an absolute abuse of our justice system. And so I actually had somebody that, that I have a tremendous amount of respect for that I have done, uh, juujitsu with that is a police officer, has been a private invest, or not a private investigator, but, uh, um, um, an individual who has handled certain situations like this.
Um, but, but before I get to that, let's, let's go ahead and read this article. Which says, that should parents be responsible for child's mass shooting? The jury says yes. Hmm. Again, and it's not even like mass shooting because that's not the legal precedence that's being set here. It's should parents be responsible for their children's unlawful acts?
Jury says yes. Because it doesn't just stop at mass shooting. It's gonna be, if your child commits vandalism, if your child gets into a car accident and they're at fault, if your child, whatever it is, this sets a terrible legal precedence. And it says, A school shooter's mother is headed to prison after a Michigan jury found her guilty of involuntary manslaughter.
The verdict is the first of its kind in America, and puts the onus of responsibility on parents in a way that has never been before seen in a mass shooting case. The question of whether parents should be held accountable for the murders committed by their boys has reverberations that date back to the Columbine shooting in 1999.
Those 13 deaths in Littleton, Colorado are widely seen as the opening of a dark era in which American schools and towns have become shorthand for the mass murder of children. We shall see the effect over time, but if this does not get overturned by a court of appeals, and of course I expect there will be robust appeals, it sets an approach to parental responsibility.
And I think over time it could actually be a very Yes, that's, that's my, my legal standpoint on this is this is setting a crazy legal precedence, not just for this case, because there are some super weird things about this mom like they fled to a warehouse miles and miles away, because they heard the police were looking for them and like, Not smart, not the thing to do, but also this sets a, such a weird legal precedence.
Uh, the trial garnered widespread attention given the severity of charges filed against the shooter's parents. What the outcome portends to, uh, portends for similar tragedies in the nation's ongoing battle with gun violence in 2020 for the first time firearm related incidents were the number one cause of death among children and teens.
So, here is the situation. Here's the post that I found from somebody that I, again, respect highly. It says, I told them, and it finally happened. 30 year career, 7 spent as a detective. 4 of those 7 I investigated crimes committed by juveniles and against juveniles. And again, I'm using this just as a platform to have the conversation and see both sides of this.
No venom against this person for posting it. Highly respect them. Um, but I, it is an interesting person that I think has a lot of merit in this situation. More to speak on than I, who has a, a passionate opinion from a law enforcement perspective on this. Uh, and so here it is. It says, um, 30 year career, 7 spent as a detective, 4 of those 7 I investigated crimes committed by juveniles or against juveniles.
Every morning morning, there would be 5 or 6 new cases on my desk, crimes that took place Friday night through Monday morning. The story was the same. Usually, the parent of a 12, year old child, the phone would ring at 8am sharp. My child is out of control. You have to do something about it. I would politely and tactfully tell them their child was their responsibility.
To be a good parent, get involved in their lives. Get them in counseling. Basically, supervise them. They generally push back. I don't have time for that. You have to do something. I would end the conversation by telling them, You do know you are responsible for your child's actions until they turn 18. They often replied, I can't possibly be held accountable for what my little Johnny does.
Yes, you can. Today's verdict proves it. Accountability. Okay, so here's somebody calling the police and saying, My child is doing something that I don't agree with. I would like you guys to step in and do something. This person saying, Well, that's not my job, sir. That's your job. Okay, and this is why, to me, it comes back to a psychological debate, which is nature vs.
nurture. Is a parent truly responsible for every action that their child commits? And not even that, because the child's going to school. The child's being influenced by teachers. The child's being influenced by principals, by social media, by all of these outside factors. It's not just the parent in today's world.
In fact, More often than not, it's not the parent in today's world. Is it that the Reddit threads that they're on? Is it the Instagram followers that they have that are commenting on their stuff? Is it How many factors can you look at and say, Okay, we're gonna prosecute everybody this person has had contact with over the last six months for involuntary manslaughter and hopefully they all go to jail for 60 days.
It's like, how do you, how do you dwindle this down to its most important parts and say, okay, you, you, you, and you, you're all responsible for the actions of this individual down to the point where if they go to jail for murder, you're going down too, buddy. It's like a Rico case against the entire family.
Like, no, I, I just, I, I don't see that as being the case. And, and even when somebody's going to the, the police and saying, Hey, my child needs help and I don't know what to do, you're saying Good luck, bud. And in that case, like, what if that was the parents of, uh, crumbly saying, Hey, my child's going to, I'm thinking they're gonna do this thing.
Like, to what extent can you stop them? Can you lock them in a tower with a dragon in it for the rest of their childhood until they're 18 and you're no longer responsible for their actions? I just don't, I don't see this. as having a positive outcome. I don't see it. Like, I don't see case law that could be utilized in this way.
And if you look at the state versus Norman, 1989 in North Carolina, here's a case law against it, which says, although dealing with self defense, this case highlights the principle that individuals are primarily responsible for their own actions unless there is a clear, direct causation from another person's actions leading to the harm.
If this, if his mom, if the Oxford shooter's mom was shown in text message saying, go to school, Take this gun and shoot those children, then yes, she should go to jail.
And maybe not for involuntary manslaughter, that would be murder, right? But she didn't do that. That wasn't the case. They're talking about negligence. Which, if you go in that weird, confuscated, gray area of negligence, like, there's so many Crazy ways that you can take this. Another one is that, uh, People vs.
Kevorkian. In Michigan, the Supreme Court has addressed issues of indirect involvement in criminal acts, focusing on direct causation. While not primarily analogous, Kevorkian's case, which dealt with assisted suicide, emphasizes the necessity of a direct link between the defendant's actions and the harm that occurred.
Yes, for sure. Now, if we want to look at the case law against this, we have to go all the way back to 1944 and 1907. One being in Massachusetts, which is the Commonwealth v. Walensky, which said this case established that the precedence for gross negligence, where the owner of a nightclub was held liable for the deaths caused by a fire due to inadequate safety measures, The principle here is that the failure to prevent foreseeable harm can constitute criminal negligence.
Even that's so shaky. Like, so shaky. Like, you're going to give them involuntary manslaughter for everybody who died as a result of a fire? Maybe in 1944, I guess? Even still, that just doesn't make sense to me that that person would be held responsible for that. Maybe the person who lit the fire should be responsible.
Right? It's like if somebody, sure, if there's an arsonist and they go to a nightclub and they light it on fire, that person should go to jail if people die. The owner of the nightclub, for not getting their sprinklers changed on time, should not be responsible directly or indirectly or involuntarily for the deaths of those individuals to get 60 years in prison.
The other case law this points to is 1907. The Michigan Supreme Court case dealt with a man who failed to get medical assistance for a woman who overdosed in his home resulting in her death. He was initially convicted of manslaughter although the conviction was later overturned. The case however discusses the duty of care and how failing to act can lead to criminal liability under certain circumstances.
So to me, in my opinion this is going to get turned in the court of appeals. I don't see how this legal precedent can be set because it just is such a a pandora's box of issues legally that could cause a ripple effect and and a a Utilization and weaponization of the law against people who are just unknowing and not non participants in crime just due to uh, just due to their um relationship with somebody, which in and of itself is not a illegal act.
Like it's, it's crazy to me that this is, this is being set and she was convicted. And I guess we'll see the same thing happen with her husband until this goes through the court of appeals. And I could see this going all the way up to the Supreme court because the importance of the legal precedence is going to be set as a result of this case.
Alright, and that, my friends, is what I have for you today. I appreciate you. I love you. Look out for that Tucker Carlson video. Have a great day. Thank you so much for listening to the 100th episode of The Adams Archive, and I'll see you next time right here, wherever the hell you're listening, whether it's Spotify, Apple Podcasts, leave a five star review, subscribe, do what you gotta do, but have a great day, and I love you.
Thank you so much.
-
Welcome to "The Adams Archive," where we delve into the intricate weave of societal influences and global challenges. In our thought-provoking episode "Foundations and Frontiers," we explore the interplay between the development of political beliefs, the ethical quandaries of cloning, and the complexities of environmental activism.
Episode Summary: This episode offers a deep dive into the foundational elements that shape our political ideologies and how these perspectives intersect with contemporary issues like the ethics of cloning and the paradoxes in environmental advocacy. We take you on a journey through these interconnected realms, providing a nuanced understanding of these critical topics.
Segment on Political Socialization: We begin by unraveling the layers of political socialization. Discover how familial interactions, educational systems, and media landscapes contribute to the molding of our political identities from a young age.
Segment on Cloning Ethics: Venturing into the realm of biotechnology, we examine the ethical implications and societal impacts of cloning. This segment explores the moral dilemmas, regulatory challenges, and public perceptions surrounding this controversial scientific frontier.
Segment on Environmental Paradoxes: In our discussion on environmental issues, we confront the ironies and complexities of modern environmental movements. We analyze the actions and rhetoric of global forums and key figures, assessing how their approaches align or conflict with various political ideologies.
Call to Action: Dive deeper into these vital discussions by subscribing to "The Adams Archive" on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, and other platforms. Join our social media community for ongoing conversations and updates.
All the Links: Access all our content easily at https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams, your gateway to our episodes, social media, and additional resources.
----more----
Full Transcription:
Adams Archive.
Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we're going to go through some pretty wild current event topics, including the fact that the World Economic Forum in their meeting in Davos has decided that it is now bad for the environment for you to drink.
Coffee. Could you imagine that? Flying hundreds of miles across the ocean in your private jet, only to talk about how it is now bad for the environment for you to drink coffee. So we'll touch on that. After that, we'll get into a conversation surrounding how scientists in China have now successfully cloned a monkey for the first time that has survived in good health.
We'll talk about what that means, including the fact that there was 112 failed attempts, which is only, you know, pretty terrifying to think about. What the other monkeys went through to actually get there. Now, a lot of people are talking about how this is actually going to have something to do with human cloning, obviously, because that's the end result of all of this.
And there's some arguments that that's already happening. So we will talk about that. Then we will dive into a conversation about the current situations between Rhonda Santus dropping out of the presidential election, Nikki Haley getting peppered and just chirped. Constantly at all of the events that she's at, including the fact that, uh, there was a recent article that talked about how she had an affidavit come out from a recent accuser of her being an adulterer, uh, to her then active duty husband.
Uh, we will also touch on another man who starts discussing with her about how she's not going to be Trump and that she should be spending all of her hundreds of millions of dollars simply. Giving it to homeless veterans, which I guess I agree with. Uh, so we'll talk about Nikki Haley. We'll even talk about the fact that Nikki Haley said that she wasn't allowed in a beauty pageant because she was Indian because they didn't know where to place her, which is pretty comical.
All right. So that will be our current events. Then we will dive into the deep dive conversation this week, which is going to be the dark psychology behind voting. Now, that will include a conversation surrounding, uh, political socialization, which is basically the idea of how you got to vote the way that you vote.
Now, we all tend to think that we think for ourselves, but a lot of people don't understand the fact that there's a lot of circumstances that actually go into why you vote the way that you do. So, we'll talk about all that. And there's some pretty surprising things in that that I found when doing my research.
Anything from the music you listen to, to the social media apps that you use consistently, all the way down to the income class and the city that you grew up in. There's, there's so many little different things in here. And then we'll talk about some different dark arts techniques that politicians use in order to try to gain your So all of that and more stick around the longer you stick around, the deeper we get.
So go ahead and subscribe, leave a five star review, whether you're on Apple podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, you can join us on YouTube, by the way. Uh, if you go onto YouTube, type in the Adams archive, you can see all the articles, all the videos that we're discussing here, and I will see you there, but let's.
Jump into it.
The Adams archive.
All right, let's jump into it. The very first topic that we're going to be discussing today is going to be that the world economic forum. If you don't know the world economic forum is a meeting of a bunch of. Elites or multibillionaires that think that they can control the general population. They meet once a year in Davos in Switzerland and their fearless leader is the infamous Claus Schwab.
And so they got together this year and decided that the hot topic that they were going to discuss is the fact that it is now bad for our environment for you to drink. Coffee, like I said earlier, they fly hundreds of thousands, thousands of miles to get there in their private jets, just to tell you that you shouldn't be drinking coffee all the while they're the ones who are, I don't know, profiting from your extra, uh, ability to actually do things in the morning as a result.
So we have a video here, um, this comes from, uh, let's see, the title of this article is coffee is bad for the environment claims world economic. Members, and it says the consumption of coffee is causing CO2 to populate the earth to pollute the environment and unelected bureaucrats Attending the World Economic Forum claimed speaking last Wednesday at the globalist Confab in Davos, Switzerland Swiss banker Hubert Keller said coffee drinkers should be mindful They're contributing tons of co2 pollution into the atmosphere Hmm.
Basically, the coffee that we all drink emits between 15 and 20 tons of CO2 per ton of coffee, Cowher said. So, we should all know that. This is, every time we drink coffee, we are basically putting CO2 into the environment. Could you imagine? And one of the reasons is because most of the coffee plantations and most of the coffee is produced through monoculture, and monoculture is also affected by climate change.
Now at this meeting, they are the very biggest topic this year. So you can actually go to the world economic forums website and you can look at, they do a analysis of what are the biggest threats to the world each and every year, and lo and behold, this year's was. Climate change. Hmm. Now, that's obviously the next big money grab after the end of COVID 19.
Now, that's to be determined, I guess, when you have the variant X that's coming up and all that stuff. Um, but climate change is obviously the biggest money grab. And so when we look at conversations surrounding them trying to, I don't know, condemn you for drinking coffee. Just is unbelievable to me. Um, so this is, uh, this is the video.
It comes from that Swiss banker and his name is who cares? Here we go. For the session and you raised the coffee example. I'd love just to give you the chance to
Basically, the coffee that we all drink, um, emits between 15 and 20 ton of CO2 per ton of coffee. So, we should all know that. This is every time we drink coffee, we are basically putting CO2 into the atmosphere. Um, the other, and one of the reasons is because most of the coffee plantation, or most of the coffee is produced through monoculture.
And, um, and, and monoculture is also affected by climate change. Um, the quality of these nature assets is, uh, deteriorating quite rapidly.
Now that's a conversation for another day is like, what is monoculture, uh, monoculture agriculture is, it is absolutely, uh, a completely ineffective way to, to do things and it actually poisons your food there. There's a whole bunch of our stuff that you can read up on monoculture, um, agriculture, but. Just the idea that all of these pompous assholes go meet up in some mountain somewhere to tell you that you shouldn't drink coffee is absolutely comical.
Alright, that brings us to our next article, which says that, uh, this comes from, uh, the Telegraph. And this was something that came across, I had actually like a, a, a notice on my phone about this. And I, I've talked about some of these things before, whether it be the, uh, chimeras that were coming out of China.
Whether it was the sheep that was cloned, whether it was like the baby pods that they were talking about, uh, you know, basically taking, uh, the sperm of the father and the egg of the mother and putting it in this like pod that they were going to grow a human out of. Um, and then more recently even creating children from stem cells, which is the most probably dystopian of all of this, but this is just along those lines.
And so. In China, they cloned a monkey for the first time that survived in good health after 112 failed attempts. Now it says that Chinese scientists used the same method that made Dolly the sheep in 1996, uh, but it has lived longer than any other cloned primate. Now they, they, I think that they gave this thing a name, this one, not Dolly.
I think it's called Retro. Yeah, that's the monkey's name. The cloned monkey's name is Retro. A monkey has been successfully cloned by Chinese scientists and in the world's first has so far lived for two years. Researchers have cloned primates before using the same method that created Dowie the sheep in 1996, but none have.
Ever lived for long, either dying before birth or shortly afterwards. Now that was a conversation that I brought up last time, when we're talking about the human baby pods and you know, the, the human cloning is like, how many times are you going to go through this, whether it's the stem cell research, whatever it is.
How many research subjects, the chimeras fill in the blank. How many research subjects do you have to go through until you successfully create a clone? Right. And they say 112. I'm sure they would rather not have, have people. You know, beating down their door to shut them down. So I'm, I'm sure that number is multiples higher than what they're reporting there.
Just like I'm sure it would be if they started to clone humans, if they started these little weird baby pods, if they made these stem cell babies, chimeras, whatever it is, there's going to be a massive amount of casualties and gross scientific experimentation that goes into it. So to me. Anything and everything that revolves creating life that doesn't have to do with, you know, any scientist that's sitting there with a, you know, two beakers pouring them together or whatever the hell type of stuff they're doing here, um, is just sick.
It's, it's, it's sickening to me because the, the, the torture that they put these, you know, even the two days of the trying to clone, uh, these monkeys or the, the chimeras or whatever it is, is just the, the amount of agony and the, the torture that they must go through, uh, as a result of getting this one cloned monkey.
And, and, and for what reason, like what, what is the goal of this? Why, why, what is the problem that we have to start cloning things? What is wrong with reproduction current state? Well, I'll tell you what's wrong with that. You want to get deeper and deeper into that is, is you'll understand the idea that they don't want you and then this was something that I talked about with the baby pods.
What's the most concerning to that to me is that that's no longer your property, you, you, you know, you remove the mother and the father from, from the reproductive process. Then you remove the, the hormones that are released when that baby is born. And as a result, you, you remove the protective shelter, the, the, the hormones, the, the, uh, um, You know, the motherly instincts that come as a result of birthing a child, that come as a result of having a child that is half your DNA and half the DNA of your spouse.
Now you, I don't know, go to a government center and pay five grand or whatever, and now they get to create a baby on your behalf. Only by the way, it's not your baby. It's their property. They created it. You did not create it. And, and so that is one of the most Dystopian ideas let alone the idea that they can start to interject whatever types of CRISPR technology that they want to to make the the child the the Monkey, whatever it is more agreeable more likely to be and this will actually even lead us into our next conversation To be more agreeable to be less aggressive to have different in more More Uh, personality traits that are going to lead them to vote a certain way, that are going to lead them to act a certain way, that are going to lead them to be less or more docile and less likely to revolt, whatever it is, when you, when you take reproduction, and you give that to the government, right, you have China now cloning monkeys, for what end?
I don't think they just want to clone monkeys. That's obviously not the goal. The goal is to clone humans. But why? Why? So let's, let's finish this article. It says, however, a modified technique designed to create a stronger placenta has seen a rhesus monkey be cloned, be born and live healthily for more than two years, making it the longest lived primate clone yet.
The animal was labeled retro. Only one birth was successful from a total of 113 attempts. So, they tortured a hundred and twelve monkeys to create one. The process, called somatic cell nuclear transfer, involves extracting the genetic information from a standard cell and implanting it into an egg from another monkey that has had its own genetic material removed.
Now they have this cute little diagram of how they cloned this monkey, um, but who cares? To me, that's the whole conversation, right? I think that, you know, even brings up an interesting conversation about surrogacy and, uh, you know, IVF and like, there's, there's definitely more to be talked about there, but I do think to me, this is highly concerning because you see exactly where this is going.
We know what the end goal is, but why is that the end goal? Because we can, and I think that's probably the fair answer to all of these scientists, right? It's like the people who are commissioning these scientists to do these types of experiments. They have the goal in mind, right? They, they have an idea of what, what they want to do this for.
And it's going to be profitable, right? It's going to be a reason that they can make money off of it. Right? And that, that was the baby pods, right? Like imagine Epstein Island having a whole lower layer, uh, underneath his island of baby pods. Like just, just all of the horrific things. And if you haven't heard of like the.
Um, offshore, like, child trafficking stuff is just horrific, and, and they don't have social security numbers, they don't have moms, they don't have dads, nobody's looking after them, and, and, and, just, there's no reason to open up this box, there's nothing good behind it, absolutely nothing, what, what possibly could come from this that would be good, and then you get into the, the, um, Philosophical conversations.
Does, does this monkey have, or human down the road, does it have a soul? Is it, is it, uh, you know, is it from a religious perspective? Is it, is it a child of God? Is it, is it something that is going to, uh, have similar traits even? Is it going to be sociable? Like, there, there's so much that will go into this.
And, and just Why? Why do you want to do this? Right? But scientists want to do it because A, they're getting paid lots of money to do it, but also B, because they just want to see if they can do it, right? Scientists have a certain type of personality where they, they just want to see if they can make something happen, right?
You have a hypothesis, you put it to the test, and all of a sudden you're creating an army of Lifeless, soulless, monkey human hybrids. To me, there's just, there's nothing good behind that wall. And this is just another step towards that. Another step towards whatever it is the reason, right? There's so many different ways that you could go with that, that is completely dystopian.
And I can't think of a single good scenario that would come from Human cloning. I just can't. I, I, there's, there's zero, zero scenarios where that's a good thing for humanity. Especially in a world where they're telling us that we're overpopulating, when we're obviously not. The population's on a decline.
If, if we're overpopulating on our own and reproducing way too much, according to them, why are you trying to clone humans? What's, what's the point of that anyways. So let's segue into our next conversation. This one is more recent and about politics and what that drives us from the last conversation into, and what I mentioned earlier is they can change with CRISPR technology, how.
You might vote by changing certain personality traits. They make you a little bit less aggressive. They make you a little bit more agreeable. They make you a little bit more creative. And a little bit less, I don't know, uh, productive, whatever it is. There's so many little traits within your genes that are encoded inside of your body.
And one thing that I was wondering is what is nature and what is nurture, right? Why do we vote the way that we vote? And do we Um, and I say we just like Americans do, are we born likely to vote one way or the other? The answer is yes. Um, and we'll look at that in just a minute as to why, but before we do that, let's get a little bit of election updates because Ron DeSantis has officially dropped out of the presidential race and decided to endorse.
Donald Trump, and this comes from W. M. U. R. nine A. B. C. And it says, uh, it is clear to me that majority of Republican primary voters want to give Donald Trump another chance. You think I, uh, yeah, I'm pretty sure he just obliterated every single person, uh, within the primary, um, in the caucus in Iowa. And so, you know, he saw the vague drop out almost almost immediately.
We saw it. Ron DeSantis drop out almost immediately. And I think the Ron DeSantis hype train was like pretty good at the beginning. I would, it would be really interesting to look at the political marketing failure that was Ron DeSantis campaign, because he had so much political steam. He had, he had so many people behind him that were so pro Ron DeSantis that loved his ideas coming out of COVID.
He was like the COVID king. You know, all the while, while Donald Trump being, you know, was getting flack, was, was being talked down upon for the way that he, you know, gave a medal to, to Fauci, the way that he, you know, boasted about lockdowns and certain things like that is, is, and so simultaneously, Ron DeSantis should have come out of this, like with a ton of steam, with a ton of, uh, you know, traction going into the election, and, and now what we see is that it, as soon as Ron DeSantis opened his mouth on a debate uh, stage, he just got obliterated.
Even when we saw Gavin Newsom against Ron DeSantis and I'm not against Ron DeSantis. I think that again, his policies, that his track record during COVID was absolutely phenomenal. He was one of the only people speaking out one of the only people trying not to close down businesses. There's a lot of reasons that a lot of people should have been very pro DeSantis.
I think he shook the hornet's nest with Donald Trump. Right? And I think, you know, the desanctimonious, uh, tagline stuck a little bit. Um, but, to me, it's like, he should have, had he came out on the debate stage the way that Vivek did, had he come out with the track record that he did and a great marketing campaign, there's no reason that he shouldn't be the only one left.
But out of all four people that were on the stage and on the ballot for the caucus, the only one that's left now besides the obvious of Donald Trump is Nikki Haley, which makes absolutely no sense to me at all. She is. 100 percent the Republican Hillary Clinton. She, everything that comes out of her mouth is just a talking point from a war lobby.
And I haven't heard a single thing from her. I think she had like one good. Exchange on the debate stage. But all I see from Nikki Haley is a a reoccurring talking point that is everything and anything that the lobbyists want. And you saw the one the one area that Donald Trump I think they said that he lost by one vote and I think that it was even changed that the fact that Um, he he actually ended up winning that area I'm not sure but there was out of a 90 or 100 99 of them were for Donald Trump and one of them was for Nikki Haley and by one vote So what you saw is the democrats in the areas that they were in where they could they actually went and voted in the GOP caucus and voted for Nikki Haley, so if The Democrats want Nikki Haley, then why would the Republicans, right?
And if the war lobby wants Nikki Haley, then why would the Republicans? And if every big money machine from, you know, I I'm, I'm just surprised she doesn't have a Pfizer tattoo on her arm, uh, that she's showing off to everybody, but you already see her pandering to the left. So to me, it's, it's a little sad that the only two that we have left, because I do think that both Ron DeSantis and as much shit that I've talked about Vivek and, and all of the questions that I have about his history, whether it be about the Soros Foundation funding his, uh, his, his time at Yale, whether it be about his two years that he was on the world economic forums, young global leaders list only to, uh, tell them that, Hey, I didn't want that.
Take that down. The only one that was inconvenient from him and he wasn't using it to, uh, get, it. seed round funding for his pharmaceutical startups. Um, so as much as, as much as I've talked bad about Vivek, Vivek or DeSantis are just absolutely a million times better up potential candidates than Nikki Haley.
So what that tells me, especially if you understand that her husband. Is, isn't some tech mogul, right? He doesn't have billions of dollars. I'm not sure what her previous employment was, but I just doubt she has hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars to spend on one. I think it's New Hampshire, whatever.
We're going to see a video where some guy goes and calls her out and says, Hey, you're going to spend a hundred million dollars campaigning against Donald Trump. And we already know you're going to lose. Why are you doing that? Why wouldn't you just go spend that money to help homeless veterans? Well, the answer is that the political lobby is the one that's propping her up.
That's where she's getting all of her money. The only reason that Nikki Haley is even relevant, the only reason she's standing on any of the stages she's standing on, is because she's literally has the, the war machine's hand and the pharmaceutical industry's hand up her ass telling her exactly what to say in every one of these exchanges.
And so it's, it's, It'll be interesting to see how long she sticks around. How long will they prop her up? Because I, there's absolutely zero chance. Like I bet you, if you go look at the, uh, betting books and you look at the odds of Nikki Haley winning the 2024 election is just. Zero, you know, and if, and if there was any sort of reason, and I think this is something that Vivek said at one time or another that I talked about when he dropped out is the fact that, oh, well, they would never let Donald Trump actually, you know, get on the ballot.
Something's going to happen. And, and. I'm not saying something's not going to happen, this always could be that fact, and especially when you understand that Donald Trump is like one of the most, uh, contentious and hated people in the world to the most powerful people in the world, it's an absolute possibility that something not, not good happens, you know, he's been indicted for like the 115th time, um, but the idea that Nikki Haley would be the one left in the running, and maybe that's their hope, I don't know, why would you spend a billion dollars to If there's a 1 percent chance, I don't know, maybe if you have hundreds of trillions of dollars like Raytheon, and uh, you know, Pfizer does, so, I don't know, it's very interesting.
So there was a few conversations that came up about Nikki Haley. One of the ones that came up as a result was Nikki Haley made a comment. about her history growing up in the deep south, being brown. Now, I don't know about you, and maybe my eyes are deceiving me, but to me, Nikki Haley does not look brown.
She looks like a white Suburban mother. That's what she looks like. Now, she did grow up in a Indian family. I saw a picture of her family the other day, and her dad was in some traditional type Indian garb. And, um, you know, but she, you know, if white privilege was a real thing, Nikki Haley would have it.
Not saying that it's a real thing. But. Here, here it is. Here comes Nikki Haley saying that she was, she was teased every day for being brown while in the deep south and that she has black friends. Here we go.
We were the only Indian family in our small southern town. I was teased every day for being brown. So anyone that wants to question it can go back and look at what I've said on how hard it was to grow up in the deep south. As a brown girl, anybody can look at my record and see when Walter Scott was shot down by a dirty cop, how I made sure that the Walter Scott family didn't suffer because we put the first body camera bill in the country in place.
Anybody can look at the fact that when we had nine amazing souls die in Mother Emanuel Church, I did something that no Republican or Democrat ever wanted to touch, which was call for the Confederate flag to come down because it would take two thirds of the House and Senate and was an impossible feat.
I don't know what you're implying with that, but what I will tell you is, saying that I had black friends is a source of pride. Saying that I had white friends is a source of pride. If you want to know what it was like growing up, I was disqualified from a beauty pageant because I wasn't white or black.
Because they didn't know where to put me. So look, I know.
So let me get this straight. Nikki Haley was disqualified from a beauty pageant because they didn't know whether she was white or she was black. Now, I don't know If my math's off, just like my eyes are off, apparently, because I don't see a brown woman in the deep south, I see a white privilege card holding, uh, you know, suburban mom, but Nikki Haley was born in like 1972, I think.
And Nikki Haley would have been in a beauty pageant, let's say 16 years later, almost in 1990. Right, let's say she was 15, would have been 90, 72, 87, right? Like, was there segregated beauty pageants in 1987? Cuz I think I'm missing something here and and even if there was You think they're gonna have a white and a black category and then you're gonna be like, hey guys I would like to participate and then they would say, uh White black are you white?
Are you? Uh, you're disqualified, like, do you think how that that's really how that conversation went? Or do you think that Nikki Haley is a liar? Because I think Nikki Haley is just a liar. And we see that further shown by her actions, which we will see here in just a second, against her husband, which allegedly.
And I say allegedly because it's just a signed affidavit, just a signed affidavit, which, you know, means that if the person was lying, they would potentially go to jail, but just a signed affidavit stating that she cheated on her husband while he was, I believe, while he was active duty. If not mistaken, potentially even like deployed.
I don't know if that's correct, but I know he was active duty at the time. Um, so we'll go ahead and read that article. And that to me, like if, if you are cheating on your spouse, right? Like your spouse is you're like, if you have everybody in your whole world, and there's one person that you are going to give.
All of your trust to one person that you are going to be the most loyal to one person that you're going to Absolutely not do anything to hurt. It is your spouse, right? Like when you get into a Marriage you're doing it because well for a lot of reasons But you're doing it because you want to be with that person for the rest of your life Now if I'm your best friend and we've been best friends for 10 years 15 years and you cheat on your wife I know that if you're not loyal to her, you're not gonna be loyal to me If I'm your business partner and I find out that you cheated on your wife, I know that the first opportunity that you get to make a little bit of money that screws me and my business over, you're going to do it.
So I'm not going to be your business partner and I'm not going to be your best friend. I know that if you find yourself in this situation and you are also running for office, how can I trust you as a candidate? Right? So to me, that like, that goes back to the idea that if If somebody, Nikki Haley is absolutely bought and paid for, she's going to do the thing that is aligned with what is in her, her, not even her family's, not even her, her, her immediate family, but her best interest, Nikki Haley's best interest.
So let's go ahead and read this. This comes from the Postmillennial, and it says Nikki Haley allegedly cheated on her husband with lobbyist and communications consultant prior to South Carolina governorship. Yikes. Uh, court documents have revealed that Nikki Haley did in fact cheat on her husband before becoming governor, and that one of her lovers was a married South Carolina lobbyist.
She was Having an affair with a lobbyist. So not only are you taking their money, but you're also, you know, Haley repeatedly denied that she'd been unfaithful to her husband, Michael. When allegations first broke in 2010, they've been married for 28 years. And have two children together. According to the Daily Mail, the aforementioned lobbyist, Larry Marchant, Jr.
And Haley's communications consultant, Will Foulkes admitted in signed affidavits that they both, they had both on separate occasions had affairs with the then future government. So not one. But two people, both signed affidavits. In his affidavit, Marchant said that he and Haley had sexual intercourse during a conference in Salt Lake City in June of 20, or 2008.
I came forward publicly on this matter only after being contacted by the press and after hearing Rep Haley claim that she had been 100 percent faithful to her husband in response to the folks allegations, when I knew her statements were absolutely false.
Yikes. Um, so that to me says a lot, right? And that's not to say that somebody can't change and somebody can't, you know, go through a, a, a transformation and become loyal again. And, you know, I get it. Like, but that sounds pretty shady. stuff to me, right? And like I said, if you are going into that situation and you have your one person in life that is like, that's my guy, that's, that is my girl.
That is, that is going to be the, the mother of my children, the father of my children, uh, whatever that is, if you can't find it within yourself. To conduct yourself in a manner that would align yourself with that trust that would align yourself It's just how are you gonna run for office and and let alone just even talk about the optics of this That how easy is this for them to bring this up?
Now that's not to say that every single person that's been on one of these debate stages Doesn't have a ton of skeletons in their closet, which they do But this is one of them Right? And especially with like a lobbyist. It wasn't even like her personal trainer or something. I don't know. All right. Um, now I did have one last thing that I wanted to touch on and this is about Donald Trump.
Donald Trump sent out a statement on truth and it said a president of the United States must have full immunity. Without which it would be impossible for him or her to properly function. Now I found this to be an interesting statement. The reason that I think this is an interesting statement is I kind of wanted to talk this through with you guys and see if I agree.
And I don't think that I do. I don't think a president should have full immunity. I think that what, what is the, like, I believe that there are certain things that a president has to do. I think that the presidential role is inherently a criminal job. You have to. Murder people you have to you know engage with shady foreign entities You have to run the CIA and the FBI which just in and of itself is going to come with illegal illicit activities as they've shown a track record for for you know, however long since the you know, 47 when the FBI was or the CIA was created But to me, it's like how could I absolutely disagree with this?
I don't think a president should have immunity I think that yes, the job would be hard If you didn't have immunity, that's the job. You have to do it within the guidelines of legality, because if there's no, if a president can get into office and immediately become unhinged and have absolute full immunity for every action that they've ever taken, then, then, then what's, what.
What are we doing here? Like, you just get to murder people, you get with no repercussions, you have no barriers and guidelines to the way that you have to dictate your actions, you don't have to follow the Geneva Convention, like, what would make you think that the president should have full immunity? So, I'll continue his statement, give you the full context, but it says, Without much, it would be impossible for him or her to properly function.
Any mistake, even if well intended, would be met with almost certain indictment by the opposing party at term's end. I, I think in today's political landscape, that is true. That's what we're seeing here is that Donald Trump has absolutely been a political witch hunt. Uh, you know, how, how many indictments does he have now?
Like 30 or something. Um, how many states has he been indicted under? How many, how much of it is stuck? And really it's more about, to me, the precedence that this is going to set moving forward because then whoever gets out of office next time, same thing. Right. And so I understand the point. I understand the premise, but I just don't see how inaction that's an effective way to run a country.
Is there any country that operates that way? Maybe Russia. Maybe Putin has like absolute immunity in North Korea and China. But like, is that really what we're shooting for? Is North Korea, China, and China. Right. You know, Russia's type of, uh, you know, totalitarian regimes. I don't think so. Um, even if well intended, would be met with almost certain indictment by the opposing party.
Even events that cross the line, quote unquote, must fall under total immunity, or it would be years of trauma trying to determine good from bad. There must be certainty. Example, you can't stop police from doing the job of strong and effective crime, Trump said, prevention because you want to guard against the occasional rogue cop or bad apple.
You can't stop police from doing the job of strong and effective crime prevention. Uh, sometimes you just have to live with the great, but slightly imperfect. All presidents must have complete and total presidential immunity or the authority and decisiveness of a president of the United States will be stripped and gone forever.
Hopefully this will be an easy decision. God bless the Supreme Court.
And this says, if anything, presidents and politicians should be held to a higher legal standard, not a lower legal standard. And I think that his, his example of police, uh, just kind of defeats his entire argument there. I just don't see how that holds true because if you give police absolute immunity.
Then they're just gonna, like, I think that cops, people who sign up to be police are inherently good people. I do. I wholeheartedly believe that. I believe they generally have good intentions. But I also believe if you take a big enough sample size of people that there's going to be, as he quotes in here, bad apples.
And that doesn't allow you to Just randomly walk down the street and, you know, not follow the, the force escalation protocols that are called for being in the police force. You still have guidelines and those guidelines that police have are far more stringent. And, and they get indicted or they, they get perceived or prosecuted probably at a far higher rate than, than any political person ever as a result.
They literally have body cameras in the middle of their body that, that follows the every move. Right? Like, so, to me, the argument falls apart, and I think it's a little self serving. Um, again, I don't think Trump is going to be found guilty of anything, and I don't believe that he should be. But I also just don't think that the precedent of setting the example that the president just can absolutely do no wrong is a good one.
I just think it's a false premise, and that it will cause something horrific to happen, just like if you gave police absolute immunity. Um, the people who hold the positions of power, You know, with great power comes great responsibility, right? Spider Man. It's like you, you have to inherently have a microscope on you.
And the law has to be in place because without it, you could just turn it into a complete totalitarian regime. You could do whatever you wanted when you get, you could, and especially when you're determining, you know, the, you're the, the head of the entire largest, strongest military in all of history. So to me.
I just don't agree. Um, so now that we've properly set the stage of what is going on in our current political landscape, this is going to bring us to our deep dive of the week and the deep dive of the week is going to be on the dark psychology of voting and political socialization. So political socialization is the idea that essentially all of the things that happen in your life, all of the people that you've come in contact with, all of the key moments of your childhood, a lot of it has an impact.
on your voting and who you vote for and what political party you end up being a part of. Um, so we even have a video that I'll show you by Jordan Peterson, um, but let me walk you through this. So again, this is the go ahead and pull this up here for you says, um, so we're going to walk through this and there's a complex intersection of psychology and politics, and we're going to aim to unravel the intricate web of factors that influence our political decisions and voter behavior.
Our focus is the profound and often understated role of political socialization in shaping party affiliation and political identity. Now. Let's begin by understanding what is political socialization, right? Sounds pretty, uh, you know, political science y, like, college, uh, terms that you were supposed to memorize, and it probably was.
Um, but it's an important thing to understand. Because you have to see the other, at some point, the divisiveness has to clear. And you have to see that just across the aisle way could have been you. Could have been your, your dad, could have been your mom, could have been your, you know, otherwise things devolve into, uh, you know, what we saw in the revol or the, you know, things devolve into chaos and violence, right?
So, so, I think this is an important conversation. I think it's just an interesting one anyways because there's so many small, minute points, whether it be the music you listen to, all of those things that, that influence your voting behavior. Um, so, this process, which is political socialization. is which individuals form their political attitudes and beliefs.
And it's not a fleeting phase, but a cornerstone in our political makeup. It begins early in life, influenced by various factors. Our families, our education, our peer groups, the media, and significant life events. These elements do more than just mold our views. They embed deep seated political ideologies and preferences.
Consider the family. Often the first and most influential agent in the process. The political discussions at the dinner table. The voting behavior of our parents. The political climate that we grew up in. These experiences lay the foundation for our political leadings. And as we grow, we get educated, and we have peer interactions.
Those all come into play, introducing us to diverse perspectives and fostering critical thinking about political ideologies. Now you see with some children, right, some children just are going to do what their parents Raise them to do right. You're, you're in those, those political discussions. You have similar personality traits.
You probably are similar in the idea of like aggressivity and passivity and creativity and all of these personality traits that align with your voting behavior. So let's go ahead and jump into this. I'm going to pull up this video from Jordan Peterson and we can watch it together because I think it properly frames the entire conversation around this and I find it to be pretty interesting.
So let me go ahead and pull this up for you and we will watch it Political belief is determined in large part by temperament and personality, and that's very strongly biologically influenced. And so conservatives tend to be lower in openness, which is a trait associated with creativity, and higher in conscientiousness, which is a trait associated with industriousness and orderliness.
They tend to make good managers and administrators and lawyers. They tend to make good conservative business types. That's, that's their forte, that's their niche, and that's a valid Place to be and a valid thing to be and you know Conservatives aren't so good at being entrepreneurial, and they're not so good at being artistic and creative.
That's not their niche That's more the niche of the liberal end of the spectrum and as far as I'm concerned for the political system to function properly You need proper representation for all the temperamental types, and they need to be engaged in dialogue So but the thing is is that when the conservatives are saying well, you know especially when they're perhaps Thinking about leading the damn party, let's say, that they're worried about speaking their mind in a conservative manner.
That's just not a good thing. That means that something's gone wrong with our political system, and seriously wrong. You know, and the other thing that, another thing that I've noticed it, thing, you know, when, when this all, Some of you may know, and some of you may not know, that I made a couple of videos back September 27th.
I woke up one night, because I couldn't sleep, and I thought, I usually go and write if I can't sleep, because I've got something to figure out. But I've been playing with YouTube videos. I've been putting my lectures online since 2013. And by last April, they had about a million views. And so, I thought, wow, that's, that's really something, man.
You know, like, you write a book, and you sell a million copies, you're one happy character. And I thought, I'd A million views is a very large number of views. It really tuned me in to the fact that YouTube was something completely other than what I thought it was. But anyways, that night I thought, Oh, I'll get up, I'll make a video instead of writing it down.
So, okay, what else? Here's some things you might think about if you're a conservative. These I'll get up, I'll make a video instead of
These things have become What would you say? People are afraid to say them. Here's the first one. The fundamental assumptions of Western civilization are valid. How about that? You know, it's not
You think it's an accident? Oh, here's how you find out, okay? Which countries do people want to move away from? Hey, not ours. Which countries do people want to move to? Ours. Guess what? They work better. And it's not because we went around the world stealing everything we could get our hands on. It's because we got certain fundamental assumptions right.
Thank God for that after thousands and thousands of years of trying and because of that we've managed to establish a set of Civilizations that are shining lights in the world, you know now so we said two interesting things which he talked about is tray openness Right, which leads to creativity. And, uh, you know, and so when you think of all the main personality types, and Jordan Peterson has a really tremendous, um, personality test that you can actually go take online, I think it's like 6, it'll ask you like 300 questions, and it'll give you a score on your agreeableness on your openness on your, uh, all of these different, you know, traits, it's like the The, I forget the number of them, but there's, there's essential traits that build your personality profile.
And so if you understand that what splits the party divide is essentially to me at a certain stage of the conversation is personality traits. Right. If you're more creative and you're more quote unquote open, you tend to align on the left side. He even mentioned entrepreneurial being more liberal traits.
And you see that when it comes to like Silicon Valley and startups and, you know. The reason for that, and he talks about the people who are conservative being better managers, they're more structured, they're less creative. But the best and most creative ideas that do well in a startup environment are wild ideas that everybody will tell you are generally terrible.
Alright, take Airbnb, for example. Hey, let everybody crash at your house for a night and, you know, you charge them money and then you come back and your house will still be there. It's like, eh. That's kind of a weird idea. I don't, I don't think I'm going to, I don't think I'm going to do that. Or Uber, right?
I, I think you should press a button on your phone and then some random guy will show up and you should jump in his car and it'll take you somewhere. It's like, I don't think that's a good idea either, but they worked and they were crazy ideas. They were creative ideas and they were at the right time.
And it just so happens that much of the startup space trends. liberal and, and, uh, Democrat as a result. And much of the higher levels, the C suite of organizations and the, uh, high level managers and the people who actually run the operations of the business tend to be more conservative. And the reason for that is because they're much more structured in their thinking.
They, they tend to abide by, you know, uh, rule sets that tend to make things move along. If you're, if you're hyper creative, you can get. And you get too far out there and now you can't create a successful business. So the, the, the ideal world is you have a large amount of creativity and you can borrow some structural foundations to, to properly execute and build a idea into something that's great.
Like all of the great foundational leaders. And you think of Steve jobs, highly creative. You think of, uh, Jeff Bezos, highly creative. I don't know if Jeff Bezos would be a liberal per se, but, um, but they were able to borrow from both sides. They weren't hyper one side. They weren't hyper the other. And so what we're basically looking at when we're voting into a certain level, cause there's critical thinking and people who change their minds, but to a certain level, I would be really interested in maybe this is something that we can find out is what percentage of people change.
their voting registration from Democrat to Republican. And this is, let's, let's go ahead and find it out. I bet you there's been an answer. So let's go to chat GPT. And I will ask it for us. Because I yeah, to me, it's like we're almost looking at a spectrum of personality, when you look at the spectrum of political affiliation.
And, you know, there will be creative people who Vote conservative, and there will be highly, uh, structured and, uh, Structured people with, with low trait openness and high trait, uh, or low trait agreeableness. You know, I tend to, I was in the 1th percentile of disagree, of agreeableness. Meaning if there's a hundred people in the room, I'm the most disagreeable person in the room.
Who would have thought? Um, I, I would, I, but, uh, surprisingly Not surprisingly, if you know me, but I'm generally a very creative person. I have a lot of ideas. I'm very entrepreneurial So my openness and creativity was was fairly high So I'm kind of a unique hybrid human But I think that that it's interesting to think that through and determine, you know How much of it is personality and genetics, right?
So, let's see what percentage of people change from liberal to democrat and vice versa in their lifetime. And what age does this generally Right? And there's the, there's the old quote is I'll show you a, a, a young Republican and I'll show you a man without a heart and I'll show you an old Democrat and I'll show you a man without a brain.
That's the old school. Uh, that's the, because a lot of people trend more liberal when they're young and a lot of people trend more conservative as they get older. Some would say wiser, uh, but let's see what it says here. It says determining the exact percentage of people who changed their political affiliations.
Um, It's challenging. Several factors contribute to this complexity. Don't care. Don't care. Don't care. Um, let's see, give a percentage cause it doesn't want to.
But that's why you see the hyper, uh, successful small startups into Facebooks and Twitters and all this stuff trend, very liberal because in going to these ecosystems very liberal because well one, um, that the person starting that company is generally very creative. And two, the people Operating that company are generally in the tech space and and you're going to see people who are Um more introverted who have certain personality traits that are more creative that are going to find themselves in those coding type environments Um, so again another interesting one Uh, so I don't think it's going to give us a number here, but it says the terms live.
Okay. Don't care Let's see overall give a percentage Geez. All right. So let's, let's finish out a little bit of this video here and then we'll continue our discussion.
You can be pretty damn filthy and still be a shining light in this world, right? Because if you look around the world at the state of governance in most places, it's like the most Pathological corrupt and vicious thugs rule and to stand out as an illuminated light against that background isn't so difficult But nonetheless, you know, we're as good as it's got and unless we can come up with something better We should be very careful about messing around with that So why don't we start with the assumption that we're doing something, right?
One of the things we're doing right, for example, is that we actually value the individual, right? The individual has intrinsic value in Western societies. Do you know how long it took people to formulate that as an idea? And how unlikely that idea is that poor you, you know, useless, powerless you, with all your damn faults, you're actually worth something.
You're worth something to the point that the law has to respect you. Assumption number two, peaceful social being is preferable to isolation and to war. In consequence, it justly and rightly demands some sacrifice of individual impulse and idiosyncrasy. Because it's not and being more than normal and being and being unique and creative and contributing in that way is extraordinarily important But the fundamental point is is that social being requires the sacrifice of a certain amount of individual idiosyncrasy And that's a fundamentally conservative claim It's like you should be you should do what everyone else does unless you have a really good reason It's a good rule.
It's like, you do what people have done throughout time. You grow up, you find a partner, you establish a stable relationship, you get a job, you make yourself useful, you have some children, you do something productive and interesting with your spare time, and you try to act like a respectable human being.
That's what you do. That's a conservative ethos. If you have something spectacular about you that needs to be revealed to the world, then break some rules, man. Go right ahead. I'm dead serious about that. But most of the time, you don't. And even if you happen to be a special person, and you might be, 90 percent of you still isn't special.
So most of the time, you're still going to be following the rules. And the rules aren't there to oppress. They're there to keep us at They're there to keep us away from each other's throats. Because human beings are very warlike. And we're very We're very competitive and we're very aggressive. And if we are fortunate enough to have woven together a social fabric that basically renders us peaceful and cooperative, we should try disrupting that at our great peril.
Next.
No, I think that's an interesting one. What he just talked about is, is essentially like there's a, there's a familiar template for life of, of what is a, a, a fulfilling life template. And we're seeing people stray further and further and further from that. And he said that's a conservative leading ethos, right?
The fact that you should, uh, have a family. You should get a good job. You should have a productive hobby. All of those things, you know, you should be a productive member of society unless you're like super, super gifted in one area and you just have to dedicate every moment to it. You should probably have children, right?
And the reason that we do that is because, you know, one part of that to me is having children makes you see everybody else from a new lens. It even makes you see you from a new lens. Um, And this is in a lot of different ways, but the way that I have changed as a result of being a father is, is unbelievable, right?
You, you see, uh, uh, even somebody who's your own age, even somebody who's older than you, and you see within that person, the thing that you realize as a parent is everybody in this world is just A child acting as if they're an adult at any given stage of their life, like, at least that's what it feels like, like, everybody's just trying, man, like, it's, it's, it's, it's a tough go at life, and every single person is, is, at least attempting to do what they can with what they've been given.
That's not every case and there's some people who, who should probably try harder, but it doesn't mean that you shouldn't have empathy for them because it could be your child sitting on the side of the road asking for money. It could be you doing the same thing. If you were given a different life with a different set of skills and a different set of intellect and, and a different level of drive and, and all of these things.
So. You start to, you start to see the world and other people and society in a different perspective. And that can bring you to a more interesting religious conversation, but we'll leave that for another day. But another thing that I found interesting is, this is a thought that I had regarding my children, and I don't remember a ton of my childhood.
I wish I had a better memory. I wish I remembered, you know, the friends I had and how we played on the playground and um, sleepovers and, and uh, you know, time with my family and all of the fun trips that we went on and all of the things like that. And I do remember some highlights and I have it in there somewhere.
But it's not as, it's not as vivid as I would like it to be. And so, when you have a child, You have to realize too, and I think about this, it's like, it's very easy to write off your children's experience because it's like, oh, they won't even remember this, right? Like, oh, maybe, maybe I shouldn't have acted that way, but they'll probably forget it, because I forgot what my parent did to me in that situation too, right?
But that's a dangerous path to go down. But if you do, if you look at it from the right perspective, it's your children are the opportunity to live your childhood again only through the lens of someone who can actually appreciate it. And so, if you treat your child as if they are the opportunity for you to give your own inner self, your own inner child the opportunities in life and experiences that you, Wish you would have had or you wish you remembered.
You get that opportunity. You get to experience that thing again. And as a result, the world can open up to you. The, the creative, the, the, the way that you view everything can change. And it's a secondary opportunity to, to, to have that. If you can put yourself in the shoes of your children, and I'm sure the same thing goes for grandchildren and great grandchildren and so on.
It's really not that much so on after that, but you get the idea. So to me, it's like when you have children, you get to relive what should be and can be the most illuminating fun, exciting time of your life. There's magic and there's, there's mystery to everything. And there's so many questions that you want answered.
Like, uh, with my daughter, I'll sit there and she was asking me today, like, how was the world created? I was like, shit, that's a good question. Well, there's a couple belief systems and one of them is the religious and Christian belief system, which is that God created the earth and all the people in the universe and the stars and the sun in, in seven days.
And then there's a scientific perspective, which is the Big Bang Theory. And I tried my best to explain that pathetically, uh, but I, I explained those to her. And then she, she asked a better question when she said, is there other? Is there other things like our thing, like is there anything outside of what our, not our world, but our place, like everything, is there another everything?
And I said, well, I think what you're talking about is Like the multiverse theory or even like kind of like string theory, right? Like things can be happening simultaneously in a different reality. And so we got to ask Chad GPT to explain these things and like just the, the interest and, and mystery to her that is the, the surrounding world.
And, you know, I still feel that way that I don't know what the hell is going on. And for all I know, there's a firmament above us. And we, or for all I know, we really did go to the moon, like who knows anything, uh, which is, you know. Another interesting realization as you get older is a lot of history is just fabricated by the authors of large conglomerate organizations that wanted to rewrite history and in their way, I digress.
That's a side note, but to me, having children so important living life in a way that you are. That your ancestors lived, and there's a reason you have children. Your biology changes, your perspective changes, the way that you view the world, the way you view society, the way you view people, it all changes.
Everything, your perspective is so important, and the only way that you get that is by having a child, and having something outside of yourself that is a extension of you, that gets to go off into the world and face their own hero's journey as a result. And so Yeah, you better have a damn good reason, um, in, in all of that to, to get back to the, to the original point, which is that, you know, even Trending within the conversation that we talked about earlier of like the depopulation of the world and our trending downward spiral of population It's like there's one half of society that is absolutely outbreeding the other half of society there's one half of the political spectrum that is absolutely Having babies, not having abortions, not using plan B and living a happy, healthy, fulfilling life with children and grandchildren.
And there will be somebody by their side with food and flowers and comfort and jokes when they are dying.
And there's another half of the political spectrum that has fallen into the trap that you are. everything that matters in this universe, right? Go back to like postmodernism, right? Your perspective in your reality is the only reality. And they fall in for this trap that says like, well, I'm a girl boss. I don't need to be a mom.
Those stay at home moms are just whatever, right? Like fill in the blank. And this culture has been tricked into believing that the mom should be, you know, that the ultimate. goal isn't to be a, a mother or a father in life like that. That is everything. And they've been deceived into thinking that that's not the most fulfilling thing that you could accomplish in your life is, is pro creating and, and.
Creating something outside of yourself and giving that, that version of you, that extension of yourself, the opportunities and experiences that you weren't given, or maybe you don't remember or whatever, right? It's like such an important thing, but we are absolutely outbreeding the crazy. And eventually, the pendulum will swing right back in our direction.
I think in 20 years, we're going to see either a huge wave of non liberal. Uh, ideologies poke their head from the next generation because a very large percentage of people, much larger than any other time period of history, are deciding not to have children. And doing so through many means, including, you know, birth control and, and Plan B, but also abortions.
And, and doing so after the fact, and, and having, causing much, you know, there's, there's its own psychological effects that even come from that, so. Anyways, so important, very interesting to see him talk about that, you know, the conservative leaning ethos of creating a family unit and, and the value of that in today's world and And how that kind of even pertains to political ideology.
So here we go. Just a minute. Equity, equity. That's worse, right? Equity means Equality of outcome. It means that every single organization has 50 percent women and 50 percent men. Doesn't matter whether the men and women differ in their intrinsic preferences, which, by the way they do, the scientific literature on that is completely clear.
It was established by the early 90s. It was established in the Scandinavian countries, where they've done most to flatten out the socio economic Differentials, say, between men and women. Didn't get rid of the differences between men and women. In fact, they became exaggerated. The biggest personality differences in the world between men and women are in Scandinavia.
Just as the biggest differences in interest between men and women are in Scandinavia. Because when you get rid of the socio cultural differences between men and women, the biological differences don't disappear. They maximize. So, you hear the egalitarian, clarion call everywhere. Everything should be equal.
Everything should be equally distributed. We should strive for equity. It's like, wrong! Especially if you're a conservative. Wrong! What we want are just hierarchies of competence. Not everyone's a neurosurgeon. You know, if your father has a brain tumor, you probably want a hierarchy of competence for neurosurgeons.
So you can pick the one that's the best, so that he might not die. That's what a hierarchy of competence is for. For the postmodernists, there's no hierarchy that isn't based on power. Well, because they think the world runs on power. We need the best plumbers. We need the best contractors. We need the best Alright, so, yeah, and so that touches on another conversation, which, you know, there wasn't as much political socialization aspects within that that I was expecting, but, um, there are some interesting points there, which even talks about gender, right, there, there is a specific divide when it comes to voting percentages that are tied to gender, um, so just pulling up some of my Notes here, and we'll walk through some of those together.
So here are some of the statistics and formations of political affiliations. So here, here's what I have written up here. Um, political socialization and the determinants of party affiliation. So political socialization begins early in life. Influenced by a variety of factors including family, education, peer groups, media, and significant life events.
The family is often the first and most impactful. We talked about that. The party affiliation is often a result of long term political socialization processes. Individuals tend to align with parties that reflect their values, beliefs, and perceived Social identities, key issues such as economy, social justice, national security, environmental policies can be determinants in aligning with the political party.
Voters often choose parties they believe will be best addressing these issues according to their personal beliefs and values. Um, all right, so. impact of changing social and political contexts. Interesting, says that the political socialization is not static and can evolve over time. Changing social and political contexts, personal experiences, and exposure to new information can lead to a shift in political attitudes and party affiliation.
Yes, says research has shown that individuals who grow up in a politically active household are more likely to participate in elections and have strong party affiliation. So even starting at the the answer of do you vote? Well, if your parents vote and they found value in that, you're much higher likelihood of voting.
Surveys indicate that major political events, such as economic recessions and wars, can have a lasting impact on political attitudes and party preferences. Political socialization is Yep, and the interplay of personal experiences, we talked about that. Um, alright, so, geographic location. So people living in dense urban areas like New York City, San Francisco, often leads toward the Democratic Party, while those in rural areas, like, we know that.
But why? Right, what is it about that that makes it, you know, what I think that comes down to is that when you're shoving a group of way too many people into way too small of a space, then there's Not enough resources to go around and there's way too much, uh, oversight happening there. There's going to tend to be, well, economic disparity, right?
There's going to be people who make lots of money. As you see in every downtown area, there's like high rises with beautiful, uh, penthouse suites that are 5 million. And then there's also, you know, Shitty, slummy areas where homeless people are three minutes down the road, right? Also, occupational field, educational and field of study.
Um, it says that individuals with advanced degrees in social sciences lean Democratic, while those with business degrees lean Republican. Okay. Religious attendance. That's probably obvious. Um, consumer preferences and habits. It says a preference for electric cars. Like Tesla's might correlate with democratic leanings.
You don't say a social networks. If somebody's friends and family is predominantly democratic. They are more likely to align with the Democratic Party, and vice versa for Republican circles. So your actual social, social network in general, not social media networks. Um, attitudes towards change in tradition, travel experiences, hobbies and recreational activities.
This is, this is a good one. Enjoyment of outdoor activities like hunting might correlate with Republican leadings, while urban hobbies like yoga might. Be more common among Democrats. Who'da thought? Uh, life experiences. Someone who has benefited from social welfare might support Democratic. Yeah.
Psychological traits. Individuals with high openness experiences, which is what we talked about, have a, as a personality trait, might lean Democratic, while those with high conscientiousness might lean Republican. Dietary choices. Pet ownership. Sports. fanaticism, um, while fans of soccer or basketball could lean.
So this is great. Um, fans of NASCAR and college football are more inclined to lean Republican while fans of soccer or basketball lean Democratic. So, the two biggest pansy sports there is are generally Democrats. Interesting. Who'd have thought? I would have. Individuals with interest in organic gardening or native plant landscaping might lean Democratic.
Those who prefer traditional landscaping. Decorative preferences, literature choices, holiday preferences, tech usage, movie genres, commuting habits, craft and DIY interests. Um. Enthusiasts of crafts like knitting or pottery might lean Democratic, while those who engage in woodworking or metalworking might lean Republican.
Sleeping patterns. Early risers might lean towards conservative ideologies, valuing traditional structures and routines, while night owls could lean liberal, often being more open to experiences. and non traditional lifestyles. Isn't that funny? So if you take all these into account, let's, let's like really archetype this person.
A, uh, let's, let's just like start from the top. We have a, uh, a political, let's see, what did I say? Social sciences degree who doesn't go to church, drives a, a, a, uh, electric vehicle, um, likes to, uh, do yoga, nothing against yoga. I like yoga. Uh, Likes to listen to, it says classical jazz. Lean's more democratic.
That's interesting. Um, it says dog owners who are certain breeds like Labrador retrievers and German shepherds are more Republican while cat owners. With non traditional pets like reptiles might skew democratic. Wow. That's an interesting one. So a soccer loving reptile owning knitting and gardening, uh, Tesla driver.
Who do you think that is? Yeah. Well, but isn't that interesting? Like you can archetype these things and there's stereotypes for a reason. Like why, why does that matter if you would like to knit? Why does that make you a Democrat? If you like to hunt, why does that make you a Republican? It's such a weird, distanced correlation for me that, but the causation is just like almost too high, right?
Is it, you can't say it's causation. Obviously if you hunt, it doesn't, maybe it does. Like if owning chickens will definitely make you a Republican. Um, but, but it is, and I guess there's something to that. It's like realizing that you don't need daddy government, realizing that you can have intrinsic freedoms that aren't.
Just given gifted to you by those in power. No, they're they're your freedoms and and you are given those Regardless of what government says about it, right the we hold these truths to be self evident We were given these, these freedoms by God, not by the government, not by Joe Biden, not by, not by the, the tech overlords who determined censorship and what we can and cannot say.
No, we, we hold these truths to be self evident. We have a right to life, liberty. The pursuit of happiness. We have a freedom of speech. We have a freedom of, of, uh, to, to bear arms. We, all of these things that are the most important were rights given to us by God, not allowed by daddy. Right. And so maybe some of these things are just gateways, right?
I assume if somebody watched soccer, right. And you really like soccer, but then you watch, you know, watch some hockey or watch some UFC. You might realize that's a little bit cooler than soccer. If you start knitting and you see, uh, you know, uh, uh, I don't know, what were some of the hobbies? Um, whatever, whatever you want to say about a Republican.
Um, It's just so interesting to me that there's, there's such a correlation between personality traits, hobbies, interests, all of these little buckets that you can put on is just like a perfect archetype of the situation here. And again, this isn't anything against. Uh, this is against you if you net, sorry, like, there's some cooler things you could do with your time.
It's also against you if you like soccer or baseball over football or hockey or the UFC or jujitsu. Um, definitely against you, but not against you if you're liberal. I don't care what you vote for. Um, I do think there's some, you know, we don't need to get into all of that. I'm not going to apologize, but Um, I'm also don't, you know, cons, line perfectly conservative.
It's, but anyways, let's, let's go on. Language usage. Uh, concrete language could correlate with conservative leanings while preference for abstract nuanced language is, can indicate liberal. Clothing brands. Hmm. Vacation choices. Humor preferences. Gadget preferences. Social media behavior. Recreational reading material.
Artistic preferences. Parenting styles. Attitudes towards time. A more flexible and relative view of time might indicate liberal leanings reflective of adaptability and focus on present experiences, whereas a punctual, regimented view of time might suggest conservative leanings. Yeah, try that in the workplace, bud.
Uh, gender and voting behavior. The influence of gender on voting behavior and political affiliations is a critical aspect of electoral dynamics, reflecting broader societal trends in gender related issues. Uh, historical trends, gender differences, and voting patterns have evolved over time, influenced by changing social norms and the political empowerment of women.
Initially, women's voting patterns were similar to those of men, but over time distinct gender based preferences have emerged. Uh, Interesting. Uh, gender gap in partisan affiliation. Says the gender gap in partisan affiliation has been widening with women increasingly leaning towards the Democratic Party in the United States, a trend observed in several elections over the past decades.
Uh, the shift can be attributed to a variety of factors. Um, the presence of female candidates, particularly high profile positions, also influences gender based voting. Um, interesting. Statistics. It says, according to Pew Research Center, in 2018, U. S. midterm elections, 59 percent of women identified as or lean towards the Democratic Party, compared to 47 percent of men.
A Gallup poll showed that women by a margin of about 10 percentage points are more likely than men to prioritize issues like health care and gender equality. Interesting. Uh, so political tribalism is interesting. Uh, political tribalism is characterized by a strong in group loyalty and opposition to out groups has become a defining feature in modern democracies.
Right, we see this play out perfectly and, and I, I, I would love to see RFK Jr. It's, it's really too bad that he just dropped out, you know, and, and decided to be independent because I would love to see, uh, Robert Kennedy jr. Be the Democratic nominee. I would be just as happy to see him as the Republican nominee I I just think he to me he has the the Despite shortcomings in his affiliation and ideologies that would align closer to mine I do think he's the most reasonable candidate.
I do think he's the most capable candidate I do believe he has the track record that I would want to see of having a distinct Uh, issue with unchecked power, like the CIA and the FBI, to me, it is, you know, I don't think we're going to see a landslide victory for a third party, uh, candidate because there's just too much money and too much FRAUD for that to be the case, but too much money going that way even, right?
So social media amplification. So a Pew research study found that political polarization United States has increased dramatically over the past two decades with more people ideologically aligning strongly with their respective parties. So people are now even more entrenched in the idea of the two party system, which I just.
I don't, like I just said, I would vote for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. If it came down to it and he was actually a real candidate, like if he could actually win. I absolutely think that I, I would definitely consider the opportunity to vote for him. I think he's very reasonable. I love his stance on COVID and, and all of that stuff.
I, I don't love his stance on, you know, uh, gun rights and a few certain things that I've heard of and I believe abortion. He talked about, um, some things like that, that I just, I don't align with him on, but I think overall. The position of president is a, uh, is a, more of a, uh, a figurehead than anything.
And, and he aligns more with the figurehead that I would see demonstrating competency and the checking of power within our government than, than anybody else at this point. Um. So there's some really interesting subpoints that we could get into. Uh, you know, we, this has some things about media bias, only 3.4% of, wow, that's a crazy one.
So let's talk about that. Only 3.4% of US journalists identify as Republican. So 90%, 97% of journalists that are out there today are liberals, are Democrats. And you wonder why our media, and this even goes for like people writing for Fox News, I'm sure it's not all conservative journalists, like, that is crazy.
I just wonder why that, why that even would become the way that it is, especially in today's environment where like, the old school journalist is just the epitome of what I would like to see in today's world. Exposing government corruption and, and calling out the, all of the things that are wrong about our politics and, and everything like that.
Like that used to be the, the, the, the cigarette in their mouth with like an investigator's hat in a, in a notebook and they would go find the truth. Like that used to be the old school journalists. 97 percent of journalists are, are liberals. So how do you, how do you function in a society where 97 percent of the articles, 97 percent of the opinions that are being pushed into the public psyche are not aligned with 50 percent of the country?
And to me, it's just so wild that it is a literal 50 50 split. Like how does that even happen? The statistical likelihood that the political divide being a. Almost exact 50 50 split to where every year there's a potential that we might win or we might lose or they might this and they might that and like the percentage likelihood that it's a 50 50 shot is so unlikely to me like it just doesn't make any sense statistically that that that would be the split it just seems way more likely that 65 percent of people would be this or in 35 percent of people would be this and the next year right or four years from then You It's, you know, 43 to, you know, 57.
And it just doesn't, it doesn't make any sense that it's so close. And then that just, to me speaks to the tribalism that is today's modern political divide, because, and again, I think it definitely comes down to personality spectrums and it definitely comes down to some, but, but it also comes down to the fact that 97 percent of journalists identify as one half of it and are pushing constantly.
Right? That's the same reason that you see the big pushes for, uh, minority communities from the Democrats, for, uh, female communities from the Democra Like, they're trying to subsection and further tribal make it tribalistic, even more so than it has to be. Uh, but that's a wild statistic. Wild statistic.
That 97 percent of journalists are liberals. And that came from a survey done from, and that was from the Washington Times. That is crazy.
All right, let's move on here to the next portion of this, which is going to be, let's see any other interesting statistics. A study by Pew Research Center found that 77 percent of Americans believe that major news outlets,
major news outlets report with a bias, you don't say, highlighting widespread concerns about media impartiality. Analysis by Harvard University showed that coverage of certain political figures and issues varied significantly across different news networks, uh, reflecting a varying degree of editorial slant.
Yes, again, um, if you need a good news source, you should, and I signed up with ground. news, and they will show you, like they'll be able to tell you the article title, you can click it, it'll tell you how many people or what, what organizations with what political slant. Recorded what about that article or who reported none of it and it gives you all these really interesting statistics I highly highly recommend that more than anything else that I've you know news wise that I would recommend to you And then here's the more interesting part of this too, which is the psychology of political campaign strategies.
All right. Now there's, there's a whole section on this and this, and this actually might be a, uh, it's pretty long. I think this might be a discussion for a whole nother day. So we will do that emotional manipulation and political advertising. Um, the cognitive dissonance in politics, the, I want to give it its due and I, you know, got to go to bed at sometimes guys, psychology of political campaigns strategies.
Uh, countering media bias, all of that stuff. So, we will save that for another day. In the meantime, I hope you have a wonderful day. I hope you appreciated the conversation. I hope that I gave you some reflection on maybe why you vote the way that you do. And you start to question the construct that is your social, political identity.
And say, hey, do I agree with literally everything that everybody on this half of the country, agrees. It says I should agree with, or maybe I have some varying degrees of, of, of, uh, thoughts on these topics. Maybe there's a spectrum within my own thought processes that are on one side or the other. And, and, you know, I can't point to too many things.
That I, you know, uh, differ from, but I can point to several, several that I wholeheartedly believe, you know, when it comes to, uh, psychedelic legalization, when it comes to, uh, some social programs, I think there's some room for them. Um, but, but again, if I, you know, anyways, I hope I gave you some reflection and, uh, in the meantime, head over to YouTube, subscribe if you're there right now, I appreciate you.
Uh, subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, leave a five star review if you appreciated this conversation. I appreciate you and I love you. I hope you have a great day and I'll see you next time on The Adams Archive. Adams Archive.
-
Welcome to the Adam's Archive, where each episode is a journey into the depths of intriguing topics. Join your host, Austin Adams, as he unravels conspiracies, explores controversial legacies, and dives into groundbreaking events that shape our world. From the dark secrets behind historical figures to the revolutionary moves by institutions like the FAA, each episode promises a captivating exploration.
In today's episode, we peel back the layers surrounding Martin Luther King's assassination, exposing alleged conspiracies involving the FBI, CIA, and the military. We then shift gears to examine the debated values and controversies surrounding King's legacy. Brace yourself for a revelation as we unveil the FAA's bold move in recruiting diverse talents, exploring the impact on the aviation industry.
But that's not all—tune in as we reveal the winner of the Iowa caucus and discuss the potential global concerns raised by influential figures about Trump's 2024 election prospects. With in-depth analysis, exclusive revelations, and compelling storytelling, the Adam's Archive is your gateway to the most explosive topics of our time.
Don't miss out on the visual experience—head over to our YouTube channel, where Austin's charismatic presence accompanies each episode, providing a comprehensive view of the articles and videos discussed. So, whether you're on the go or settling in, join us at the Adam's Archive, where every episode takes you deeper into the stories that matter. Don't forget to leave a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, and remember, the longer you're here, the deeper we get. Let's dive in!
All Links: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
Substack: https://austinadams.substack.com/
----more----
Full Transcription:
Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adam's Archive. My name is Austin Adams and thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we're going to be doing a deep dive in the theme of today, which is actually Martin Luther King Day. You're not listening to it on Martin Luther King Day, but I digress.
It got me interested in the topic and I learned a little bit more about it. So now I want to share my findings with you. Which is the fact that Martin, Martin, Martin, Martin Luther King was actually, allegedly, not really allegedly, but allegedly, assassinated by the FBI in cahoots with the CIA and The military intelligence and the reason that this came about was because of a 1999 trial by somebody who is a whistleblower who said that he worked with the mob and was paid 100, 000 to hire a hitman for this job by those same individuals who moved all the moving pieces around.
To make it happen. So we'll discuss that. We'll dive deep into the situation. We'll also have a conversation about Martin Luther King in general. There's been some controversial conversations about his values and things like that. So we'll talk about that. And when it comes to some current events, we're also going to discuss this, which is the fact that the FAA is actively now recruiting people with severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities.
As a part of a diversity and inclusion plan. Don't worry. We'll talk about it. After that, we will talk about the next thing, which is the fact that, uh, the caucus is going on tonight in Iowa. So we'll just briefly super briefly touch on that because I believe we already have a winner and we will also discuss the world economic forum coming out and saying that the idea that Trump could potentially win the 2024 election is.
And I quote, and this actually came from, I believe, somebody, the, the, uh, head of BlackRock, uh, a woman there that was at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, said that it was a great concern, quote, unquote, if Trump won the election. Now, all of that and more, make sure you stick around, because the longer you're here, the deeper we get.
Alright, so, before you do that, uh, go ahead and Leave a review, Apple podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, wherever you're at, go ahead and click the five stars. If you're on Spotify or Apple podcasts, if you haven't watched the episodes before all of the stuff that I'm talking about here with you on the podcast is also available on YouTube, just with my beautiful face and all the articles and videos that we're watching up on the screen for you.
So if you're working, whatever you got going on, you're cleaning up the house, whatever you're doing. Put on YouTube, man, I'll be right there waiting for you. And you'll actually be able to see everything that we're discussing all the articles and everything there. All right. So without further ado, let's jump into it. The Adams archive.
All right, let's jump into it. The very first thing that we're going to discuss today is going to be that the FAA came out and said, And you're hearing this correct. The FAA said that they were going to start doing diversity hires for people who are severely and mentally incapable. That seems like the absolute worst idea in the world.
If there was any job that you would do, and I can actually speak to this, uh, and I'll get into more detail on that for you. But if there's any job that you shouldn't be able to do, this should probably be on the list. So here's this article. It comes from the post millennial and it says Biden's FAA is actively recruiting people with severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities as a part of diversity and inclusion plan.
Yeah. If you're terrified. Because when I was in the, the FAA certification process right when I was going through air traffic control school to be in the Air Force when I was in the Air Force, um, we wouldn't even when you went in and you got your FAA certification, you got this little pink card that showed that you were an air traffic controller.
You had to go through all these tests. The tests were quite difficult, by the way, so I'm not sure like my class of air traffic controllers from tech school at Uh, Biloxi, Mississippi did essentially, we had 24 people or 27 people or so when we started and by the end of it, eight of us graduated. So it's, it's not like this is easy stuff.
And then you go to your actual base and then even a larger amount of people wash out at their base, depending on what base you go to. Now, when it comes to the FAA, allowing severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities to be a part of this organization and these types of jobs, we're talking about.
People who have your lives in their hands at all times, when you talk about air traffic controllers and pilots, you need to be mentally sharp, you need to be mentally capable, you need to be able to make split second decisions that are going to choose life or death for hundreds of people at a time. And here's how I would explain air traffic control.
You know, some people, everybody thinks it's like the person with the cone sitting down on the runway. No. The air traffic controller either has one of two jobs. One's in a tower, one's in a radar facility. And if you're in the tower, you're basically working air traffic within maybe five miles around your base.
And if you're working in a radar facility, like I did, you work potentially up to 20, 30, even larger. Distances than that. So you're controlling. So when, when you're doing a radar facility, you see a screen when you're in tower, it's a little bit different and you use different tools, but when you're in the radar facility, you see basically a screen and it looks like a video game.
And there's little triangles on there with little, you know, letters and numbers. Next to them. And each one of those triangles could represent anywhere from two to 250 people. And your job as an air traffic controller is to, is to look and observe the altitude of the aircraft that you're looking at, check their, uh, the altitude, their speed, and then you're supposed to create.
Patterns. There's already generally pre created patterns, but you're, you're supposed to keep them within the air traffic patterns, tell them when there's traffic, give them the, the distance, the speed, the altitude of the traffic. And, and at the same time, you know, there were certain times in the air traffic facility when one person would be working upwards of 20 to 25 different planes at a single given time.
So you can imagine what that looks like when you're trying to maintain and track 25 small triangles and make sure that they don't hit each other, because if those triangles touch each other, you could have killed 500 people. Now, when we're talking about the FAA allowing severely intellectually and psychiatrically disabled individuals into the FAA, we're also talking about pilots.
Now, I don't know about you, but I just watched a recent Netflix movie and it's the most. It's like the highest net, the highest watched Netflix movie right now. Pretty sure it's like Sons of Snow or something like that and essentially what happened is back in the 1970s there was a pilot, a perfectly capable, unmentally handicapped, or severely intellectually disabled individual, a perfectly healthy individual, who was a pilot, who was the co pilot, and he hadn't really driven this plane through the area that they were in through these mountains and During the 70s, this, this plane was commissioned through the, the military to ride these like rugby players and their families all over to go play a match.
And when they did that, the co pilot was maintaining the aircraft and was lost just by 40 miles. And 40 miles seems like a really long distance, but when you're going 300, 400 miles per hour It's not. And so you could do that in 25 minutes, 20 minutes of just going the wrong direction, you're 40 miles off off path.
And so when what happened was this guy lowered his altitude and did so so much that he hit the tail end of the plane on the back of a cliff, broke the plane in half, it ripped the wings off of the plane and stranded these 27 people in this Horrific, mountainous, frigid, freezing area. And those people were there for 80, 81 days.
They survived in the climate where the temperatures would drop 80 degrees in one hour. It's a little graphic movie, so I'll give you that. Parental discretion. Don't watch this with the kids, and don't watch it if you don't have a or if you're a little queasy when it comes to, I don't know, cannibalism, because it's kind of a theme throughout it all, but this is a real story that happened.
And the only reason that these guys survived, a certain amount of them, survived was because of their, both their heroic acts, and The fact that they ended up cannibalizing each other and the story is truly amazing and in a testament to humanity and how certain individuals in that situation can step up into leadership roles and to, uh, you know, work alongside other people to delegate tasks and all these amazing things that they did together.
It's actually a really interesting case study on like almost, uh, uh, the, the antithesis of Lord of the Flies. And I think that's partially because a small portion of these individuals actually happened to be teammates prior to this. So they were already on their own side. They were all wearing a Jersey together.
They had some camaraderie. And so I think that's a, that's a big piece of it. But I also think that when you're in that situation, there's always going to be several leaders who step up and decide that they're going to speak for the group and that they're the ones that are most capable to lead them out of a terrible situation.
And you really find the character out of an individual when they're in a situation like that, and whether they step up or they look around the room to meet the eyes of somebody who's going to, and there's different people for different roles in life. And that's not to say that any one person is less than the other, but I do think that there is a certain gene within.
A man or a woman that makes them more capable leaders than others. And when you're in a situation that is literally life and death, you want to make sure that you have a capable leader. In this specific instance, they actually had the captain of their team that helped. Uh, take on that initial leadership role that they all kind of looked to throughout this film.
Now, it's truly an incredible film, and I know I'm getting off on a tangent here, but you should go watch it. Don't blame me, because I already warned you about the cannibalism stuff. All right, guys, like, don't, don't be messaging me, getting all mad at me for, but it's, it's a great movie, and, and it's definitely worth the watch, and it'll make you queasy for, you know, a few scenes, but.
It's worth it. It's interesting. And so, when you have somebody who's a co pilot and for 10 minutes looked the wrong direction and wasn't following the right, you know, path. Like, I don't know how many people were on the original plane, but it was probably at least 70 people died as a result of this tiny little mistake.
This isn't a cab driver, and even then, you probably shouldn't be a cab driver if you have severe intellectual disabilities. So when it comes to the FAA, the standards are high for a reason. Hi for a reason, and it's for your safety. So when you have Boeing with their 757s that came out flaunting in a video where all of their engineers are now women walking through a trade show in slow motion thinking they're all cool.
Meanwhile, they should have been in the back of a hangar with a screwdriver screwing on the windows or the door that fell off of the The airplane like every single piece of aviation has to be handled with extreme care from the mechanics that are working on a plane, obviously, to the FAA or traffic controllers that are maintaining your traffic and giving telling people where to go and how to get there and how to get there safely to the pilots that are actually sitting in that cockpit, making sure that you and your family land.
Without dying, that's a pretty important role, don't you think? And I don't think that that's somebody that I want to have severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities. And when we go back to my time in the Air Force, when I was an air traffic controller, you wouldn't, if you were feeling any sort of anxiety, or depression, or any lingering mental health issue at all, you would never, never go speak with a therapist.
It was a death sentence for your career. An absolute death sentence for your career. If you went to speak to a therapist, a psychiatrist, a psychologist, you would not be able, they would immediately strip you of, of your, your duties. You wouldn't be allowed to go do your job because now you're, you're at a risk and they can't risk having somebody with a medical history of any mental health issues or physical disabilities or intellectual disabilities because.
You can kill people, not even just like one or two. You kill lots of people in air traffic or as a pilot. And all of those decisions that you have to make are split second decisions. So, this is absolutely crazy to me. But let's, let's go ahead and watch this here. Or I'll read it for you. Which says, The Federal Aviation Administration places a priority on hiring people with severe intellectual disabilities as a part of the Diversity and Inclusion Initiative.
According to its website, the FAA claims individuals with targeted or severe disabilities are the most underrepresented segment of the federal workforce. Under its People with Disabilities program, the agency says, it actively recruits, hires, promotes, retains, and develops and advances people with disabilities.
The FAA targets the following disabilities as a matter of policy. Hearing. Vision, missing extremities, God, partial paralysis, complete paralysis, epilepsy, severe intellectual disabilities, psychiatric disabilities, and dwarfism. Could you imagine if you go to get into your plane and as you're boarding Delta flight, you see a blind, deaf dwarf with one arm sitting there ready to fly your plane?
That doesn't sound like a good idea at all. I am immediately grabbing my luggage and turning right around and exiting the plane. Because that's, I'm not trying to be ableist or whatever the fuck you want to call it, but there are certain qualities that, that make you capable of flying a plane and being deaf, blind, missing extremities, or being deaf.
Paralyzed seemed to fall under the category of the things that you wouldn't want from your pilot, I would say. Now, the FAA told Fox News that it seeked qualified candidates from as many sources as possible, all of whom must meet rigorous qualifications that, of course, will vary by position. Its website reveals that those with disabilities or those who have veteran status can be hired via non competitive or on the spot process as long as a manager files the proper paperwork, thus giving them preferential treatment in the hiring process.
The aviation industry has received further scrutiny from the public in the wake of Alaska Airlines door plug being blown off the sides of its two month old Boeing 737 9 Max aircraft, causing it to make an emergency landing. In a post on X, tech mogul Elon Musk asked, do you want to fly in an airplane where they prioritize DEI hiring over your safety?
He added, it's actually happening. People will die due to DEI. And I wholeheartedly believe we should just switch those. It's D I E, guys. When it comes to the FAA, at least, it's D I E. It's no longer D E I. So he posted that on X and then, uh, goes on to talk about how Boeing had that situation that occurred as well.
Now, they go into a whole history of Boeing's DEI program, uh, which is just as concerning as we see it all actually playing out now with the 737's door falling off mid flight. Flight, could you imagine and the people that were supposed to be sitting in the the aircraft next to that door that fell off I'm pretty sure like missed the flight or something like that Now it says the Alaska Airlines situation came on the heels of a shocking report in December Which showed that there was 19 instances where planes nearly crashed into each other at the airports in the first in the first 10 months of 2023 Wow.
This was the highest number since 2016. The report noted that the FAA had struggled to hire more air traffic controllers, and as the number of flights a day has gone up, the number of fully certified air traffic controllers is down 1, 000 people from 10 years ago. And that's when I was an air traffic controller.
It was literally 2013, 2014. Yeah. So interesting. Wow. Didn't know they were in that much dire difficulty that they'd hire somebody who's completely paralyzed to be an air traffic controller. The bar is Sticky tape on the ground. All right, and that leads us to our next conversation here, which comes out of, and I guess let's do this two ways.
We could do one of two ways. We can start with the caucus, or we can start with the World Economic Forum. You choose. I'll wait. Oh, you said you wanted to start with the World Economic Forum? Perfect, let's do that. So it says, from the post millennial, the potential 2024 Trump win of great concern to Davos elites at annual World Economic Forum meeting.
So, every year, if you didn't know, A bunch of multi billionaires of all these corporations across the world that all come together to conspire on how to control you, on how to eliminate your freedoms, on how to put you into a tinier and tinier box every year, and strip you of the ability to transport yourself from point A to point B, and figure out a way to continue to siphon money off of you, so they can pay it to themselves.
Oh, and also, you know, take every single power, uh, advantage that they can over the general public. They meet. In the, I think it's like the Swiss Alps in Switzerland and at Davos and all these people get together and they conspire together and they have these fancy looking meetings and then, you know, Klaus Schwab walks up there in his Star Wars attire and talks about how you're going to eat the bugs and you're going to, uh, Oh, nothing's I'm be happy with it.
Like all of that stuff, right? That's the World Economic Forum, if you didn't know. Sure you did, because you're listening to me. But, if you didn't know, there you go. Now, the World Economic Forum leaders, specifically from BlackRock, said that Trump becoming president is of great concern for them, when it comes to their annual World Economic Forum meeting.
And that's again comes from the post millennial, which says in 2024 GOP front runners, Donald Trump's potential return to the white house was of great concern to one elite and stoked fears and others at the earlier work at the yearly world economic forum meeting. In Davos, Switzerland, going to the into the Iowa caucuses, Trump is far ahead of primary competition in recent polls, the potential for him to become president of the United States against burden nervous discussions, thousands of miles away from the elite meeting.
You know, we've been there before and we survived it. So we'll see what it means. BlackRock Vice Chairman Philip Hildebrand said, according to Bloomberg. Certainly for a Europe, from a European perspective, from a kind of globalist, Atlanticist perspective, it's of course a great concern. You hear that, that word?
Globalist, right? European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde. Thought that Trump going back to his office, it was obviously a threat in an interview this week before the elite meeting that she attends regularly. The video's in, uh, French, so I won't play it for you unless you speak French, in which case go find it and listen to it yourself and then you can tell all of us what it says.
The former Swiss National Bank president also shared Lagarde's fears of Trump returning to office. Former Vice President Al Gore did not think it was a foregone conclusion that Trump would get elected. I don't think it's a foregone conclusion, he said. Yeah, well, thank you. I've Been through the process.
I've run four national campaigns over the years and seen it from that perspective. I've seen a lot of surprises over the years. The yearly elite meetup started this week and goes until January 19th. And as always, I do cover that in length as well, every year. So I'm sure we will be doing that also this week.
All right. Now, just because they just said that I would love to share with you that the Iowa caucus has been called and Donald Trump took just 34 minutes. To win the election or the caucus, whatever. Um, so let's go ahead and read a little bit about that here. And that is. Interesting to me because it was such a landslide that Donald Trump won in Iowa.
He won by 75 percent of votes within the first 30 minutes. Now this is supposed to get dragged out a little bit, but basically everybody's already calling it because they're saying that there was so many people. And I'm sure we have even more of a definitive. Statistic now, but there were so many people that voted for Trump out of the generalized first election counting that was happening within the first 35 minutes that they just went, eh, guess it's Trump, which is scaring the shit out of a lot of people, especially if you're in Switzerland right now.
Uh, so that's cool. What I found to be interesting was that following Donald Trump, at least at the time that I'm reading this was Nikki Haley, Nikki Haley. Surprised me by being in that position. And I guess she's kind of like the GOP, you know, the, if you want to use the word neocons or the, you know, the establishment conservatives, she's.
Literally the face of it. She used to run, she used to work at like the NATO or UN side of things. And, you know, all of that deeply entrenched in the swamp. And it surprises me that she's in second place at all, because everything that's come out of her mouth is just warmongering bullshit. Next up after her right now is Ron DeSantis.
Now, what's even more interesting than that to me is the fact that Vivek Ramaswamy is in fourth place behind DeSantis and Nikki Haley. For how convincing his speech is, it doesn't seem to be helping him much in the polls. There was a big spat this week and last between Donald Trump and Vivek, and I guess I said Vivek, but I'm pretty sure it's Vivek after I called him out a few times, but it's Vivek and In that spat, uh, Donald Trump basically said that Vivek is trying to go out and say that, Oh, he's, you know, there was a picture that came out of Vivek next to four individuals, uh, younger looking guys who were saying that, you know, Save Trump, choose Vivek.
Which is basically the idea behind that is the fact that Trump's not gonna be able to get near the White House, and they would never let that, so you should choose me because I'm the next best option. Now, I don't disagree with the sentiment of some of that. But, that pissed off a lot of Trump voters, and it also pissed off Trump, which Made Trump respond to him and basically just obliterate the vague fairly quickly I would be really interested to see them on a debate stage together.
I don't know if we will which is super sad to me Because it would be I don't know That's what democracy is is hearing two people stand up there and have an argument about their belief system so that we can decide Who's full of shit and who seems to be telling the truth? Now, the real answer is, they're all full of shit, none of them are telling the truth, but at least we get to feel like we partake in the process.
At least we get to feel like we heard them speak from their own mouth and have some sort of verbal combat with the other individual that we're deciding between. And I think that's important. But it's telling, as we go into all of these debates, that there has been no Democratic debates at all. There has been no debates with Donald Trump in them.
There has been no Joe Biden speaking out about what's going to happen. Now that's a super interesting one because we still have no idea who's even going to be the front runner. I believe there's more and more whispers now that it could be Michelle Obama, however, which would make for a very, very interesting election.
I think that might be one of the only ways that you would see Trump have a difficult time winning. And specifically, and only because of perception. It's like, Oprah, Michelle Obama, I don't know, who else? The Rock, Mark Cuban. Like, those would be like the four people that I could see even giving Trump a hard time, potentially, if they actually showed up and debated him.
Now. There you have it. There's your update on both Trump and the caucus. And I think that we will be seeing these landslides pretty consistently as the time goes on in the conservative party because Trump's just trounced absolutely destroyed the vague. And that to me is the only possible individual that It could have gone toe to toe with him in any way, shape, or form.
So now it's like almost a race for second, which is what everybody's saying about this. It's like, yeah, we're watching this only specifically because we want to see who comes in second place. And, and hopefully, you know, honestly, I would rather have a vague than DeSantis or Nikki Haley. And, and I'm, I'm not against.
DeSantis, his presence throughout this election cycle has just been absolutely atrocious. It was sitting on the debate stage getting just pummeled, pummeled by Gavin Newsom in their debate. Just watching that was so difficult. I just prayed. That Vivek gets the same opportunity. And again, I'm not a Vivek supporter.
In that way, I have a lot of questions about Vivek and his sincerity. And, uh, there was actually even more news about Vivek that came out this week in his snaky little ways. Which is the fact that one of the companies that he owned, the one that made him much of his money, was a pharmaceutical company, right?
We know that. But also, what ended up happening was he basically bought the rights to a dead pharmaceutical drug that lost all of its clinical trials, never went into the third phase of trials, and then, basically, this was for dementia, purchased the drug, and I think this was under Roivint, And purchased the drug and then put it back through trials.
Only this time there was one difference in the way that he put it through trials. He put his mother on the team that was conducting the trials. Lo and behold, after a few rounds of. Running these scientific trials, suddenly there's this amazing breakthrough in the dementia world and this medication could have gone and been an amazing thing.
The stock jumps up to almost 200 per share from almost nothing. Then, as it goes through the third round of trials, the stock plummets because it doesn't pass the third rounds of clinical trials. What we call that is a pump and dump the I there was their entire idea was to purchase this pharmaceutical drug make it appear through Scientific swindling which is basically all sciences today anyways, especially when it comes to pharmaceuticals over literally anything and then Pump up the stock by putting out some some PR information sending your son on a PR Trip to go to speak on all of the best talk shows and you know his Silvery slick little tongue.
And then as soon as right before you're supposed to go through that third round of clinical trials, you drop all your shares and that leaves all of the money, all of the money that's lost to the individuals that don't drop it in time. And that's exactly what they did. So he's just a pump and dump little schemer.
So thought that was interesting. Something I learned this week as well. All right. So, those are your main topics today, but there was one last thing that I think will segue us into the Martin Luther King conversation. And this actually is interesting because it comes from Robert Kennedy Jr. at a speech at Hillsdale College, in which he calls out another situation where the powers that be attempted to assassinate individuals who didn't fall in line, which perfectly segues us into our conversation about Martin Luther King.
So, here's the video, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaking at Hillsdale College. And this is actually interesting because JFK is, you know, um, is actually the one who allowed, uh, the FBI to conduct its wiretapping on Martin Luther King. Now there's a reason behind that, that he was trying to basically allegedly expose.
The fact that Martin Luther King wasn't a communist and all these claims and that a lot of that, but we'll get to that in a minute. But it is just funny that we're speaking to his nephew or watching his nephew speak about the topic that he was the one who, you know, allowed the wiretapping. Anyways, here we go.
Watch here as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. drops an absolute bombshell about the federal government and well, just watch because it's pretty wild. Then in 2001, in June, the CIA sponsors the first of its pandemic simulations. It simulates a biological attack on Washington, D. C. by Saddam Hussein.
This is in June, 2001. That simulation got, got international press, and a lot of the CIA people like Judith Miller from the New York Times was promoting it, going around doing all the talk shows. It, uh, it triggered two Senate hearings, one by Joe Biden's committee. And that hearing was in September 2001.
What happened in September 2001? The 9 11. So that hearing was going on during 9 11. As soon as 9 11 happened, the neocons, which were working on all this stuff with the CIA, Pulled out the Patriot Act, a 350 page statute from a shelf where it had been waiting for a while. And in one week said, we want to pass this in a week.
There's only one member of Congress who read it, which was Dennis Kucinich. And he went crazy. And said, you have no idea this is the end of American democracy if you do this. It allows the CIA to spy on Americans. One of the things the Patriot Act did is it did not get rid of the Geneva Convention or the Bioweapons Treaty, but it said no federal official can be prosecuted for violating those two statutes.
So it reopened the bioweapons arms race globally. And when the, a week after, when the Patriot Act was being debated, and it was being held up by two senators, There was an anthrax attack on the U. S. Capitol. It was blamed on Saddam Hussein, and although the neocons all said, see, we were right in the pandemic simulation, Saddam Hussein attacked us.
And we used that as a justification to go to war against Saddam Hussein. And within two days, we passed the Patriot Act. Who got the anthrax? Two Senate offices. Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy, the two senators who were blocking the Patriot Act. The FBI did a one year investigation. They said this anthrax was unique.
It was Ames anthrax and there's only one place in the world it could have come from, Fort Dietrich, the CIA lab.
Damn. Bomb. Shell. dropped by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. there. That is absolutely insane. Now, if you grew up in the area, the era that I did, or even after you remember being terrified of anthrax, you remember hearing about how, Oh, somebody could just send you a letter and all of a sudden you're dead on the ground, dad.
But now come to find out that that entire scare, the entire anthrax scare that we recall that's sifted and that's, that's seared into our memory was because two senators held out on the Patriot Act because they said it would end democracy. And as a result of saying those things and deciding not to approve it, they had of all of the senators that were there, those are the only two.
Individuals who received the letters with the anthrax in it as a threat saying pass this or else and as he just said in the very end there, the fact that not only were they targeted, that was obviously blatantly clear why they were doing it, but also the only way, the only way That that could have, or the only place that that specific type of anthrax could have come from was Fort Detrick with this CIA.
This is what you have to realize, is when you're dealing with these organizations, especially, you know, and I say especially back then, and that could still be perfectly well the case. That nothing has changed, and they're still absolutely conducting this type of thing. They're probably just a little smarter about it, and the documents are classified for another 30 years, right?
Because every 30 years, you're going to go, Oh, that was in the 1990s. That was in the early 2000s. They wouldn't do that to us now,
guys, right? They, they wouldn't do that to us now, as all the senators are in a room, looking at each other, hire a specific, uh, a specific intern to open up all your mail, right? Like, it's so crazy to see that the lengths that they went to, you know, To go to combat anybody, anybody. going against their wishes.
And even that's interesting what he said about the fact that they had a 350 page bill already written for exactly this type of situation. And then they utilize that emergency situation to pass whatever bills they wanted. And they could have put anything in there. And what he said is that there was only one person who read the damn thing.
Because how do you get a week to sift through 350 legal pages, which is a nightmare. But that's your job. How isn't it that everybody read through those? How is it that they didn't come with, if I'm in that position, I'm coming, I'm taking all of those documents, I'm going home, and I'm putting a flashlight down on it with a highlighter.
And then I'm, I'm taking those and writing notes into a journal, and making, writing down my thoughts, and then coming back to the table and going, here's what's wrong with this, here's why you shouldn't pass this, and make an actual argument. But that's not what these senators do. They are told, here's the package, you pass it.
Now when anybody has a brain in these positions, you know, we talked about Madison Cawthorne a couple days ago, or a couple episodes ago, where he spoke out against some things that were happening, and guess what? With a 95 percent general re election cycle for a senator, he didn't, he was one of the 5%. And he was super popular among the people.
Um, so, if you don't do what they say, you're not They're going to make you do what they say, whether it's through blackmail, like we talked about yesterday with or yesterday, we talked about it last episode. It seems like yesterday on Friday. Um, we talked about Epstein blackmail, right? We talked about now, even physical threats like anthrax, or even what we'll see from here from Truman's, uh, FBI here is the fact that they sent Martin Luther King a letter and they sent Martin Luther King a letter basically saying kill yourself And if you don't somebody else will do it for you within 34 days, and it won't be as pleasant That's an actual letter, and actually, I'm sorry, that was Hoover, um, that sent, that sent that letter, uh, but terrifying what these organizations are, are willing to do to hold their power and to make their decisions be unquestionable, right?
You can't, you can't say anything back against these organizations or else, well, or else what? Well, or else we'll kill you with anthrax. Don't even read it. Because if you do, your moral compass will get in the way. Just pass it. That's all we need you to do. That's why you're in your position. It's because we paid for you to be here.
Now pass the bill. Right? That's all they want you to do. They don't want you to think. You're not there to represent the American people. You're there to represent the globalists, like we talked about with the World Economic Forum. You're there to represent the lobbyists. And you're there to represent the people that gave you your money to get there.
Not the people who voted for you quote unquote To be in your position. No, because that's not how you really got there. You got there because you had a 25 million dollar donation from BlackRock And I found this to be interesting too and this is a side note while I'm waiting for some other things to pull up here, which is the fact that George Soros has traditionally gone after local level officials because the cost to lobby people into positions of power in Washington is so much more than it is to do it locally.
If he wants a DA in, in, I don't know, Chicago, he can get one there. If he wants a judge in Des Moines, Iowa, he can get one there at a much lower cost than actually trying to get somebody into a presidential position and get something somebody into a Senate position. It's much easier for you to get somebody into a local run.
Then you are into a national one. So this leads me to where this all started, which is the fact that on Martin Luther King day, the FBI posted on their Twitter account, which is quite ironic. First of all, but let's go ahead and read what they had to say. The FBI posted on January 15th of 2024, this MLK day, the FBI honors one of the most prominent leaders of the civil rights movement and reaffirms its commitment to Dr.
King's legacy of fairness and equal justice for all. Well, guess what? That got hit with a community note and I will share it with you because it's absolutely hilarious and I'm so glad that this exists. Here it is. Let me go ahead and share it on the screen for you here. So here's the tweet from the FBI and here is the Community note, which says the FBI engaged in surveillance of King attempted to discredit him and use manipulation tactics to influence him to stop organizing.
King's family believed the FBI was responsible for his death. Praise the community notes gods that this got posted because in one community note on X, they absolutely obliterated the FBI absolutely obliterated them. This, this has to go down as the single greatest community note in Twitter X history is the fact that the FBI got community noted as being the potential perpetrator of Martin Luther King's death.
Directly under their tweet. Now I would love to go look at the comments of that because that has 3. 7 million views, but this leads us into our next conversation. Did the FBI assassinate Martin Luther King? Well, by the end of this, hopefully you have your answer because I know mine. So let's begin this at the very beginning of the situation.
I'll give you a brief breakdown and then we'll walk through some of the pieces that we pick up along the way. Alright, so, I have some of this written down, so bear with me, but I wanted to organize this in a way that was easy to understand the totality of this situation, because once you get into the details, whether it's JFK's assassination, whether it's Martin Luther King's assassination, whether it's Bobby Kennedy's assassination, whether it's John Lennon, all of these become so complex and confiscated because that's the goal.
All they need to do is create enough enough doubt around the situation that they can just continue doing their job. So here we go tonight. We're peeling back the layers of a story that quite frankly, the mainstream media is too timid to touch. The assassination of Martin Luther King jr. Now. You all know the official story, the one that's been neatly packaged and sold to us by the FBI for years.
But what if I told you there's another side to that story? One that's been shrouded in government secrets and mystery. First, let's set the scene. Martin Luther King, the face of the civil rights movement. A man who is no stranger to the specter of death. In 1958, he survived a near fatal stabbing. In 1963, post JFK's assassination, he eerily predicts a similar fate for himself.
This isn't just a footnote in history, it's a chilling prelude to what's to come. Now fast forward to 1968, King and his Southern Christian Leadership Conference comrades are in Memphis, Tennessee, advocating for the rights of sanitation workers. It's a noble cause, but it turns out to be King's last. On April 4th, at the Lorraine Motel Room.
Room 306, a room that practically had King's name on it. His life is tragically cut short by a sniper's bullet. The FBI story? James Earl Ray, a convicted criminal, acted alone. Sound familiar? But, let's not be so quick to swallow the narrative. Ray is captured, and the stories we're fed is that he's a lone, racist gunman.
But hold on! Ray soon recants his confession, reclaiming that he was just a pawn in a larger game orchestrated by a shadowy figure named Raul. This is where the plot thickens. Consider this. The King family, not satisfied with the official account, starts digging deeper. They uncover enough anomalies and inconsistencies to file a lawsuit against Lloyd Jowers and various government entities, alleging a sprawling conspiracy behind King's assassination.
And in a stunning turn of events, they win the case. Testimonies during the trial implicate not just Jowers, but also the FBI, the CIA, the U. S. Army, and even elements of the mafia. Now let's talk about the evidence. The rifle that was supposedly linked to Ray to the linked Ray to the crime scene was never conclusively matched to the bullet that killed King.
So, the bullet that was lodged in King's head when he died was not a match to the specific rifle that James Earl Ray allegedly used. Now, then there's the mystery pattern of deaths and intimidations. Witnesses, key figures, anyone who dared to challenge the official narrative met with untimely and suspicious ends.
Also sounds familiar to JFK's now doesn't it? Is this just a series of coincidences or does it point to a desperate attempt to silence the truth? Ray's own story, frankly, is riddled with holes. Here's a man with a limited understanding of firearms. A low military marksmanship score suddenly pegged as a mastermind, capable of executing one of the most significant assassinations in American history.
We start to ask some more questions. Then there's the hasty manner in which Ray was pinned as the lone assassin almost immediately. Authorities find him in case closed. But the discrepancies are glaring. Questions about the ballistic evidence, the rush to judgment, the odd sequence of events post assassination.
Is a jigsaw puzzle with far too many missing pieces. Now consider the broader context. This is the 1960s, a time of turmoil, of government distrust of agencies known for court, for covert operations and dirty tricks, the King's family lawsuit. And the subsequent verdict didn't just raise eyebrows. They blew the lid off the official story, suggesting that Martin Luther King's.
Junior's assassination was not the act of a lone, hate driven gunman, but the outcome of a deep rooted, multi layered government conspiracy. So let's dive deeper. Ray's narrative of being manipulated by Raul presents a picture of a man who was unknowingly set up to be the Fall Guy in an assassination that was part of a larger and darker agenda.
This Raul character, who remains shrouded in mystery, is said to have directed Ray's actions, including the purchase of the alleged Murder Weapon. It begs the question, was Rey just a pawn in a much more complex game of high stakes political chess? And let's not just gloss over the rapid response that was given in conclusion by authorities.
Almost immediately after King's assassination, the focus narrows on Rey, with little exploration into any alternative leads. or motives. The evidence, such as the mismatched ballistics, Ray's lack of fingerprints in the alleged sniper's nest, and his dubious claim from escape from prison paints a picture of convenient scapegoating rather than a thorough investigation.
The mainstream media also ignores the broader climate of the time, a period rife with political assassinations. Civil unrest and a deep mistrust of government agencies in this context, the idea of a government linked conspiracy doesn't seem so far fetched, does it? The King family, meanwhile, steadily, steadfastly, maintained that Ray was not the true assassin.
They contended that his role was merely a diversion, a cover for a larger conspiracy involving government agencies and other powerful entities. Their victory in the civil trial against Lloyd Jowers and various government entities was just a win, wasn't just a win in court, it was a public declaration that the truth about King's assassination was far more complex than the world was led to believe.
Now, let's talk about the aftermath. Before we do that, I do want to discuss one thing. Who was this Jowers fellow? Lloyd Jowers was an individual who was connected with the mafia, who alleged During this court hearing that he was given a 100, 000 to hire a hit man to kill Martin Luther King. He was told at the time that he was given that money that there would be no police presence around.
They told him the exact place for him to be in. And when you look deeper and deeper into the situation with Martin Luther King, there's a ton of questions around this. First of all being they moved. Martin Luther King Jr. from his existing hotel room into another one, one with a balcony view. Interesting.
Also, within this time, there was government assets on the ground in the area surrounding him. Not some security force, just random government assets on the ground. Similar to what we would say, I don't know, February 7th? Is that what they say? Or January 8th? What's that date again? Hmm. So, there's more and more questions to be asked here.
Right? Now And again, the, the, the connection between the government, the CIA and the mafia is so bizarre during this time. You talk about all of the situation with Jack Ruby when it comes to JFK and the connection there. It just seems consistently a narrative that the CIA was working alongside the mafia to conduct these types of hits.
Let's look at the aftermath of King's assassination and the series of mysterious deaths that followed. Key witness individuals with potentially damaging information suddenly and conveniently got out of the picture. It's a pattern that's too consistent to be mere coincidence. It's almost as if someone was tying up loose ends, ensuring the official narrative stayed unchallenged.
Let's not forget the peculiar handling of the crime scene. The swift removal of potential evidence. Like the tree obscure, obstructing the alleged shooters view and the immediate intense focus on Ray as the sole perpetrator. It's as if the authorities were more interested in closing the case than covering the full story.
This is where the mainstream media often fall short. They don't dig deeper. They question the narrative handed to them, but that's not how we operate here. We look at the facts, the inconsistencies, and we ask the tough questions. So, let's look at some more of these details here, november 1964, after their earlier efforts to discredit Martin Luther King Jr. are unsuccessful, the FBI prepares to send Dr. King an anonymous package containing a document that will come to be known as the poison pen letter. FBI intelligence chief Bill Sullivan himself takes some plain unmarked paper.
And pretending to be an American Negro, types out an anonymous threatening letter. addressed simply King. The letter began by calling Dr. King a fraud and warned that the demise of his reputation among the public was fast approaching. The package also contained an audio tape, a compilation of FBI surveillance allegedly of King engaging in multiple extramarital affairs.
The document's ominous closing, according to some scholars, Suggested that Dr. King was given a deadline of 34 days to take his own life or suffer the humiliation of the tape's release. The interpretation of this by the people that investigated the FBI later and by just about everybody who has gone through these records believes that they intended for him to commit suicide.
The FBI sent the package anonymously to Dr. King on November 21st, 1964, but it went unopened for over a month because King was in Oslo, Norway, accepting the Nobel Prize. The first person to eventually open Sullivan's threatening package long after Christmas is Mrs. King. King and his associates. When they listen, there you go.
So. The FBI went to blackmail, that is blackmail, blackmailed Martin Luther King Jr. to try to get him to commit suicide in order to escape the humiliation of his own infidelity. And we talked about honeypot schemes when it came to Jeffrey Epstein in our last episode, and it seems to be the case here. All they did was, you know, potentially, had somebody go and show a lot of interest into him that was very attractive for lots of money.
Had them sleep with her, him sleep with her, and then recorded the transaction that was occurring. And now they have blackmail to get him to do whatever they want. Now, obviously, it's probably not a fair exchange to either die or suffer humiliation of being an adulterer. But, they thought it was enough.
And so And they're still doing this today, right? We saw that with the Anthrax, like they would even go further lengths than this to get their way. And their way has not changed, whether it was back then or today. They're still doing the same things, guaranteed. Maybe it's changed technologically in the fashions that they're doing it in.
This is the same old tactics, it's the same old company that has been doing this since their inception in 1947. And I think the FBI is obviously a different time than the CIA, so I'm thinking CIA there. But same difference. Right? So, that goes into the next conversation, which is surrounding who was James Earl Ray?
And why do we think he's innocent? So let's bring up that and we'll discuss that video, because here it is. This is actually from the trial, which occurred that we were discussing this entire time. And he, let's go ahead and here we go. Let's watch it.
Item of evidence to with the rifle that allegedly a comparison was conducted of the bullet material removed from Dr. King with the 12 test bullets that could be adequately analyzed. This comparison revealed that the gross and unique characteristic signature left on the 12 test bullets by the James Earl Ray rifle was not present on the death bullet.
There you have it. If you were to say Mr. Hathaway, what are your recommendations here today? I would say I continue on, try, uh, attempt the um, cleaning. It may or may not help. And secondly, I would attempt to get those FBI tests to see the earlier tests compared to the test of 30 years later.
This is them conducting the testing for the ballistics to match when they fire the rifle.
Which forensic science in the 90s and earlier was such horseshit. And I'm speaking about things that sucked then and suck now. I'm sure it's not. I'm sure it's much better now than it was. But just seeing these guys sit in the lab and be like, well, there's no scratchies on here. And so there's scratchies on that one.
He must have killed him. You see them now be stopping them at different points. I'm
going to just take it up to slightly higher. That's what we're going to be working on. There you go. So that was just the forensic science surrounding it. Let's see if there's any other conclusion. There you go. Yeah. As you can see, we can get much better. But, you have to make your own evaluation on that.
Of course, I think there's other ways you might come to,
you know, the same conclusion on it. Different, different ways.
All right, so there you have it. There's the video of the ballistics and forensic science surrounding the rifle, not matching either. And then to top it all off, let's finish out with this video here from 1977, listening to James Earl Ray himself.
So you heard, uh, you heard the news on, on the radio, is that the way you heard it? So you were driving, you left at that gas station at 2nd and Linden. What, about 6 or? I don't have any way of knowing, I think it was around that time, but I don't even know if it's Linden, I know the approximate area it is.
I've seen the map on the inquirer. And you were going back to, uh, to pick up this man that you say is Raul? No, I was just waiting the car back. So you heard all this confusion, turned and flipped on the radio, they said Dr. King's been shot. Uh, at that, did you think you were set up at that point? Uh, no, I was headed towards, toward New Orleans when I had the radio on.
I used to keep the radio on. I think, uh, I didn't, I have too strong feelings about the, the shooting. When, when you met Raoul, you, did you, you didn't know any other name for him? That's the name that he said was his, and that, that's all you ever knew? Yeah, I never did. And you met him where? Canada. Up in Canada.
And, uh, and you just met in a saloon, or? It was a saloon in a waterfront area of Montreal. You never became good friends, then? No, I wasn't good friends. Just business. These were all aliases, I assume. You don't think Raoul was a real name at all, then? No, I've got some pretty good information. Papers in there saying there's Raul, San Diego or something, New Orleans, supposed to be, uh, him, but I don't have the FBI, that's material from the FBI files, but I don't have no, uh, nothing to substantiate that.
So you think their mind was made up when they got you? Well, it had to be made up, uh, they couldn't, uh, Um, well I don't know what, if there was any penalty for, uh, extraditing someone fraudulently or not, but So there's his discussion around who the figure was that was Raul that helped to set him up that gave him the money to purchase the hitman and basically set up the whole scheme for him.
That was the liaison between him and either the organized crime organizations and the FBI. So that's. That's the story in a nutshell, right? There's lots of little minute details. There's documentaries that have been done on this, that you can go check out yourself, but I wanted to give you that higher level.
There was a lot of moving pieces, a lot of things that, that came up that changed, uh, that caused, uh, Martin Luther King to find himself in that situation in that time, that was the strings being pulled by these organizations. So I had a few of them written down from some of my research on this, and it starts like this, This.
So, the FBI wiretapped and spied on Martin Luther King. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover tried to blackmail Martin Luther King, and the FBI covered up his death and investigated themselves. In a 1999 civil trial, they determined the FBI was involved in his assassination. Sure, we talked about that. Then they created a federal holiday, um, in his name.
Right? What is it besides that? Let's look at some of these here. The King family friend and attorney, William F. Pepper, won the civil trial, which found that the U. S. government agencies were guilty of being part of a conspiracy that resulted in the wrongful death and assassination of Dr. King. The damning positive evidence, or body of evidence, presented to the jury, During this trial suggests that US governmental complicity, which the jury obviously found extremely credible and included testimony about the following.
The US 111th military intelligence group were at Dr. King's location during the assassination. The 20th special forces group had eight, had an eight man sniper team at the assassination location that Usual Memphis police special bodyguards were advised that they weren't needed on the day of the assassination.
Regular and constant police protection for Dr. King was removed from protecting Dr. King. Just an hour before the assassination military intelligence set up photographers on the roof of a fire station with clear view of dr. King's balcony dr. King's room was changed from a secure first floor room to an exposed balcony room.
Memphis police ordered ordered the scene where multiple witnesses reported. As the source of shooting cut down on their bush or cut down on their bushes that would have hit a sniper. So Memphis police ordered the scene where multiple witnesses reported as the source of shooting to cut down the bushes.
That would have hit a sniper along with sanitizing a crime scene. Police abandoned investigative procedure to interview a witness who lived by the scene of the shooting. The rifle Mr. Ray delivered was not a match to the bullet that killed Dr. King and was not. Cited to accurately shoot so there's some additional evidence from this trial that came out and obviously that's pretty damning and It goes right alongside the situation, you know You talk about John Lennon being assassinated this way for speaking out against the the war machine you talk about JFK you talk about all of these People that were speaking out to power finding themselves in the same situation Now here's an interesting thread, and this will be fairly quick.
Um, and it comes from somebody on Axe. So again, take it with a grain of salt. But it says that born in 1929, Michael King was the son of a black preacher known as Daddy King. In 1935, Daddy King renamed himself after Protestant reformer Martin Luther, subsequently changing Michael's name to Martin Luther King Jr.,
none of which was legalized in court. Hmm. So his real name was not Michael. It was Martin Luther King Jr. Uh, interesting. Um, there's a, uh, Martin Luther King Jr. Was a n notorious plagiarizer, so that I've typed up a few examples below. However, there are many such cases. Uh, the first public sermon that King gave in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church was plagiarized from a hully by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Foste entitled, life is What You Make It.
Uh, the first book that King wrote, Stride Toward Freedom, was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed according to documentation released and assembled by sympathetic King scholars. Four senior editors to the papers to Martin Luther King Jr. stated that Martin's writings were at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary, judged retroactively by standards of academic scholarship, are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism.
We get the point. Uh, As long as it's not the I Have a Dream speech, right? King's Ph. D. dissertation, A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wyman, contains more than 50 complete sentences plagiarized. from the PhD dissertation by Dr. Jack Boozer. According to the Martin Luther King papers, an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center of Nonviolent Social Change, whose staff includes Widow Coretta, in King's dissertation, only 49 percent of sentences in the section on tillage contained five or more words that were King's own.
Okay, so Plagiarizer, right? Probably many people back then when they're going through school. Probably many people today using ChatGPT. This says that there's a article that says, Trained, Handled, and Surrounded by Jewish Bolsheviks. And it points to a old newspaper article. I can't exactly make out the, the, let's see if I can get in here.
The Augustus Courier, the Augusta Courier, um, from August, uh, and from Augusta, Georgia. Um, it says Martin Luther King at Communist Training School. Uh, the article says, let's see, yeah, we'll move on from that, but interesting. I've talked about a few examples of the Communist infiltration of King's movement below.
Most notable is the fact that every move I'm okay. Made was dictated and approved by the Jewish handler, Stanley Levinson, who referred to King as a slow thinker and refused to let him act alone. Interesting. In fact, the entirety of the civil rights movement was largely orchestrated and funded By Jews, what?
Many examples of this can be found in Benjamin Ginsberg's The Fatal Embrace, I will list a few below. Hmm, I mean, I'll take it at face value, I guess, but I'd just, I'd have to do more research to substantiate that. Examples of the Jewishness of the Civil Rights Movement found in Benjamin Ginsberg's The Fatal Embrace.
Jewish organizations worked closely with civil rights groups during the 1960s in their struggles. On behalf of voting rights and for the desegregation of public facilities and accommodations, Jewish contributors provided a substantial share of the funding for such civil rights groups as such as the NAACP and CORE.
Jewish attorneys were at the forefront of the legal offensive against the American apartheid system and Stanley Levinson, a longtime official and fundraiser of the American Jewish Congress, became Martin Luther King's chief aide and advisor, having previously served as a major fundraiser for Bayard Rustin.
Interesting. Jack Greenberg, head of the NAACP legal defense, was the most important civil rights attorney in the United States. And, let's see, uh, Jewish individuals were, I mean, okay, I don't see, okay, what does that have to do with anything? Um, because remember, diversity is such a blessing to America, it had to be enforced at gunpoint by the 101st Airpoint Division in Little Rock, Arkansas, during the forced racial integration of high schools in 1957.
Uh, I mean, yeah, but it still should be done, right? Like, what? Um, Martin Luther King Jr. was also a well known sexual degenerate. Evidence was made available to the public when Trump instructed the National Archives to release documents pertaining to JFK's assassination. And again, not wholeheartedly buying much of this, although this is obviously true.
The FBI documents that were unsealed. Um, but I'm not sure if it goes into detail on the sexual deviancy of him. Uh, it says he typed up some of the Information regarding King's degeneracy below. Evidence was also provided that King frequently used grant money to pay for alcohol, drugs, and prostitutes. Uh, worth noting that the man most responsible for the FBI probe in the MLK was an assistant director, William C.
Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal and says, I, that initially I was 100 percent for King because I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader. Um, okay, not seeing the sexual deviancy. Uh, in February 1968, while running a workshop on urban leadership in Miami, King hired prostitutes with funds from the Ford Foundation.
He then engaged in binge drinking and group sex acts, which the FBI describes as deviating from the normal. Okay. The FBI relates how King participated in another drunken sex orgy in Washington, D. C. back in 1964. The sex acts were both natural and unnatural. Not sure what that means. According to the FBI and were performed for the entertainment of onlook.
In 1960 this was a pattern for King who according to the FBI has Continued to carry on such sexual aberrations secretly while holding himself out to the public view as a moral leader and religious conviction I mean, that's fair The FBI documents reveal that King had a sired a baby girl out of wedlock with a wife of a prominent Dentist in Los Angeles, uh, King was known to participate in orgies, especially those involving prostitutes, usually paid for by grant money.
The national civil rights museum, she's putting on display in two bedrooms of Lorraine motel where King stayed that night before he was shot has declined to depict in any way. The occupants of those rooms doing so according to exhibit designer, Gerald Esterhold would be close to blasphemy. The reason Dr.
Martin Luther King jr. spent his last day on earth, having sexual intercourse with two women at a motel and physically beating and abusing a third. Let's see the substantiation on that. Um, J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information on King's degeneracy and the communist connections was provided to the President and to Congress.
Conclusive information from the FBI files was also provided to major newspapers and news wire services. Were the American people informed of King's real nature? Hmm. Uh, not sure I buy some of that, although these documents that were released from the JFK stuff seems to be pretty well substantiated. Um, Very interesting.
So on that note, I still believe that he did a fair amount of good stuff regardless of the Articles he copy and pasted for his PhD dissertation, which I don't blame you for and if you're getting into sexual orgies Who cares? Although the fact that you're married with children probably isn't a good look and you shouldn't do that And yeah being a prominent leader of a you know, religious situation while doing those things probably not a good look either But I don't think that takes away from You know, the substantial, uh, impact that he gave during the times of segregation.
Right, there's a reason. Now, I don't, I, obviously, the reason they gave him a federal holiday is because of the ideologies and impact that he had. But also, it was a little bit due to the fact that maybe they murdered him. That could have been it, too. So that is what I have for you guys today. Thank you so much for listening.
I appreciate it from the bottom of my heart. Head over to the sub stack. Austin Adams dot sub stack. com. Get signed up there. Uh, find me on Instagram, YouTube, rumble, Twitter X, all the places. Um, and I'll see you there. All right. Thank you guys so much. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart. I love you.
Have a great day.
-
Welcome to 'The Adams Archive,' where host Austin Adams takes you on an enlightening journey into the heart of global conspiracies, cultural enigmas, and political intrigue. This podcast series sheds light on the most thought-provoking and underreported stories, exploring the unseen forces shaping our society and global politics.
Unravel the complex narrative of Taylor Swift's alleged involvement in psychological operations, diving into the blurred lines between celebrity influence and political media manipulation. Explore the mystery of underground tunnels beneath a New York synagogue, probing their origins and potential purposes. Analyze the intricate dynamics of recent U.S.-UK joint military operations, uncovering their geopolitical motivations and strategic implications on a global scale.
Dive into the art of media manipulation, examining historical and contemporary methods used to control public perception. Discover the profound influence of music and arts in shaping cultural narratives, reflecting on how artistic expression has been employed for political messaging and propaganda.
Join 'The Adams Archive' for episodes that challenge perceptions and reveal the hidden truths behind current events and historical narratives. Subscribe on your favorite podcast platform, follow our YouTube channel for engaging visual content, and get exclusive insights through our Substack newsletter. Participate in our dynamic social media community for ongoing discussions. Whether you're a conspiracy enthusiast, a curious observer, or a seeker of deeper understanding, this podcast is your portal to the untold stories of our world. Tune in, subscribe, and be part of our journey to uncover the hidden truths beneath the surface.
All Links: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams
Substack: https://austinadams.substack.com/
----more----
Full Transcription
Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adams archive. My name is Austin Adams. And thank you so much for listening today. On today's episode, we have some wild topics to get through. And I'm excited for it. So the very first topic that we're going to talk about today is going to be that the Pentagon actually responded to the idea that Taylor Swift Is a PSYOP.
So we'll look at what the response was. And that will actually look at the history of this because the fundamental idea around that is that there's a, uh, forces that be within our government that want to manipulate the art within our culture in order to influence the culture itself. And so we'll look at the history of that, whether it be Operation Mockingbird by the CIA, whether it be the CIA teaming up with certain artists during the cold war era, we'll look at all of that together.
Then. We'll jump into the next topic, which is going to be that there was some pretty shady stuff found in New York, which actually ended up being an underground tunnel underneath a Jewish synagogue, I believe. So. We'll look at that and why it's pretty, pretty crazy stuff. So there's a couple of theories on it.
We'll actually dive into the history of the specific group, because the specific group that we're talking about is a little bit different than your average, uh, Practicer of Judaism. Um, so we will look at that as well. And then we will dive into some breaking news here, which is that the United States. In hand in hand with the, uh, with Britain have the UK have actually, uh, conducted operations overseas against Houthi rebels, which some believe may be the spark of a war against.
So we'll look at the history of that as well. So all of that more, but first I need you to go ahead and subscribe. If this is your first time, I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart, subscribe. And if you are here for your second time, third time around. 100th time, whatever, because we're actually about to hit that 100th episode.
I believe we're on episode 96 right now, which is pretty wild. But thank you for being here. I appreciate you. I love doing this for you guys. Uh, we'll have some cool stuff coming up. Some interviews, some really awesome things that I am working on in the background. So thank you for being here. Leave a five star review and let's jump into it.
The Adams archive.
Alright, so the very first topic that we're going to discuss today is going to be that the Pentagon actually responded to the idea that Taylor Swift is a PSYOP. Now personally. I think this probably couldn't be more accurate. And so the reason that I think this, I think this is actually a lot of a part of the public psyche today surrounding Taylor Swift.
We see everything that's happening with Taylor Swift and Travis Kelsey and Pfizer and her recently saying that she believes that Joe Biden has done a great job and will continue to do a great job. And he's exactly what our country needs right now to stop the divisiveness like That the only way that you are saying such a thing, even if you voted for Biden and you wholeheartedly believed in him at the very beginning of this, uh, I don't think there's a person out there who is not either protecting their, their ego by, you know, not admitting that they are wrong or, uh, or Are being paid off and the likelihood that you're being paid off if you're a multi whatever billionaire this Taylor Swift is at this time and a super famous actor, actress, musician, artist, whatever is probably pretty, pretty high if you're still sitting there banging the drum of Joe Biden, or you're just worried about not getting another job again.
So you don't have to worry You go along with the, the river that is Hollywood. So it's, it's, it's crazy to see how far these people can go. So here we go. Let's go ahead and read this article. This article comes from the Post Millennial and it is titled, let me go ahead and pull it up here for you. It is titled, Pentagon Claims Taylor Swift PSYOP Speculation is a Conspiracy Theory.
Hmm. Okay, you have my back. Attention. All right. This article says after Jesse water show on Tuesday, where he said the government has been turning Taylor Swift into an asset through a Psy op Pentagon spokesperson, Sabrina sign has denied the claim. An idea that first came from human events, senior editor, Jack Posobiec quoting from one of Swift songs and the statement to politics sign said, as for this conspiracy theory, we are going to shake it off.
Wow, catchy. She continued to make other Taylor Swift puns in her statement, which stated, but that does highlight that we still need Congress to approve other supplemental budget requests as Swift Lee as possible so that we can be out of the woods with potential fiscal concerns. Haha. On December 6th, 2023.
Right after Taylor Swift won the Time's Person of the Year award, Posobiec posted to Axe, the Taylor Swift girlboss psyop has been fully activated in her hand selected vaccine show boyfriend to dink lifestyle to her upcoming 2024 voter operation for Democrats on abortion rights. It's all coming. Uh, and that was in response to the Time Person of the Year being Taylor Swift.
And I'm pretty sure that used to be Man of the Year? And now it's person of the year. I don't know. Pretty sure I heard that following the post ax Posobiec had Evita Duffy on his show, where they talked about why Swift could rally support for president Joe Biden in the 2024 election year. She's a girl boss.
She has lots of failed relationships where she blames the man every time. Duffy then asked, why are we pushing Taylor Swift? Here comes a clip from Jack Posobiec. Uh, and let's go ahead and watch it here.
Evita Duffy from the Federalists joins us now. Evita, they've just named Taylor Swift the, uh, you know, she's, that's basically her song that was used for that ad, which is a mix of Taylor Swift and Barbie, just named Taylor Swift times person of the year, uh, I
was out about a month ago. You had a great show where he talked about the Taylor Swift army coming online for the 2024 election. Is this at what we're seeing now? Are they activating
The Taylor Swift psyop. Yeah, it's not. It's not just happening now. This has been happening for pretty much a year. They've been pushing Taylor Swift on us. The corporate media has these articles fawning over her. She's like the greatest thing that's ever happened to humanity. Meanwhile, her music's pretty mid.
Um, if you, it's actually something actually to break down of her music and, uh, the melodies, she has like the same melody progressions over 20, over 20 different songs. Um, she's always complaining about the same melodies. Okay, I'm going to have to question how old this girl is. If you're going to use the word mid, you better have been born pre or post 2000.
You better be under the age of 23. If you're going to use the word mid, I'll just leave it at that. Anyways, I actually agree with it. So so if you understand what tick tock did when tick tock First started, TikTok artificially inflated the views, at least this is the idea that people have been talking about, is it took a few select amount of influencers and it artificially inflated the views that they were getting on the platform.
Those people then, who felt like they were a big deal, went and talked to people about it and told people how many views they were getting on TikTok. As a result, a bunch of people fled into TikTok. And so. What they've and they cared about the original a few official people that got their views artificially inflated I think one of the names of the girls is I don't know There was one girl that started tick tock as like the tick tock girl and now nobody really cares about her, right?
She just did like a dance and whatever and then all of a sudden she got like a billion views And so the way that they did that is they artificially inflated the views they artificially created celebrity And then they made those celebrities influence Be valued by the mass public, right? And so I think that that's exactly what happens with Taylor Swift here, I believe, because Her music to be fair is pretty mid.
Although I am cannot say that with a straight face and never will But Taylor Swift's music is garbage. It's terrible. She's a great Performer and by performer, I mean she has a great team of people around her with fireworks and laser shows and All of that, but I did Taylor Swift is a very Un impressive musician, completely unimpressive to me in the fact that she is the single most.
highest earning musician, music, musician of all musicians is astounding to me because she's just a performer. Anyways, so that to me lends into the idea. The same way that we will look at this in a minute is they artificially inflate these people's viewership. They, they get the mainstream media, the mainstream radio stations, the mainstream award shows to all.
Pump these people up, pump them up, pump them up. Meanwhile, these people are just puppets for whatever they say, from the powers that be, goes. And so that's where this idea of it being a PSYOP comes from. So let's finish out this clip, if we can, tolerate this girl's vocabulary, and then we'll continue on.
In breakups over and over again, these songs, Jake Gyllenhaal, somebody who she wrote the song all too well about, which is like a 10 minute song where she complains
about a man that she dated for no joke, three months. This is not a musical mastermind. The media is pushing her on us constantly. And if you say anything negative about Taylor, the media, the Swifties and Taylor Swift herself.
Okay. I think I know what she's going to say. A misogynist. And here's why I think that is. Taylor Swift is the perfect.
Okay, Taylor Swift's music is absolute trash. So the only way that she got into the position that she's in is if she's working with the government. So here's the, here's the rest of the article. And it says, and this was December 6th that this conversation happened on Real America's Voice. But it says, uh, Waters posted a clip of his segment to Axe on Wednesday where he had, uh, he said an idea was floated at a NATO meeting in 2019 where Swift could combat online misinformation.
So maybe here's some actual evidence of this potential Taylor Swift's the biggest star in the world. Sorry, Gutfeld. She's been blanketed across the sports media entertainment atmosphere. The New York Times just speculated she's a lesbian. And last year's tour broke Ticketmaster, a tour that's revenue tops the GDP of 50 countries.
Wow, I like her music. She's all right. But I mean, have you ever wondered why or how she blew up like this? Well, around four years ago. The Pentagon's Psychological Operations Unit floated turning Taylor Swift into an asset during a NATO meeting. What kind of asset? A psy op for combating online misinformation.
Listen. You came in here wanting to understand how you just go out there and counter an information operation. The idea is that social influence can help, uh, It can help, uh, encourage or, uh, promote behavior change, so potentially as like a peaceful information operation. I include Taylor Swift in here because she's, um, you know, she's a fairly influential online person.
I don't know if you've heard of her. Yeah, that's real. The Pentagon's PSYOP unit pitched NATO on turning Taylor Swift into an asset for combating misinformation online. This is nothing new. In the 1950s, the government strong armed Louis Armstrong into doing propaganda tours across Africa. The CIA did the same thing with jazz singer Nina Simone, except they did it without her really knowing.
In the 70s, Nixon enlisted Elvis in his war on drugs. He gave the king a badge and named him a covert federal law enforcement agent. Michael Jackson was tapped by Reagan, using his song Beat It and his public service campaigns against teen drinking and driving. Michael Jackson persuading minors not to drink, anyway.
So is Swift a front for a covert political agenda? Primetime obviously has no evidence. If we did, we'd share it. But we're curious. Because the pop star who endorsed Biden is urging millions of her followers to vote. She's sharing links. And her boyfriend, Travis Kelty, sponsored by Pfizer? And their relationships boosted the NFL ratings this season, bringing in a whole new demographic.
So how's the PSYOP going? Well, as usual, Biden's not calling the shots because he doesn't even know who Taylor Swift is. He's confused her with Britney Spears and Beyoncé. You could say even this harder than getting a ticket to the renaissance tour or, or, or Britney's tour. She's down in, it's kind of warm in Brazil right now.
Former FBI agent Stuart Kaplan. Wow, that is brutal. Stuart, is this feasible?
Jesse, the deployment of a PSYOP in the United States in this day and age is still illegal. Um, the national security law prohibits the deployment of PSYOPs or using an operative for psychological warfare. However, if I was running Biden's management perception team, I would identify someone who would align themselves with my agenda, such 600 million followers.
I would target her, I would engage her, and I would get her what, get her to do what we used to see as like public service announcements, and that type of enlistment, that type of solicitation is analogous to the old days of deployment of a PSYOP. And so in modern times, with these people having such influence and such, you know, immeasurable amount of followers.
She can potentially, single handedly, swing voters because of just the amount of followers that she potentially can influence. So the answer is yes, Jesse. Wow. And I completely agree, right? We see even back historically between Elvis and Louis Armstrong, this has been done before. This isn't a new tactic.
And so as we go on, we'll see. And I wanted to kind of Preempt this for you. And he talked about it a little bit with Travis Kelsey, all of, and even behind that was the tick tock. There was a whole trend around the Travis Kelsey, Taylor Swift relationship situation on tick tock, right? People were going crazy.
Girls were making jokes to their, their husbands and their boyfriends. And those were going viral. And I talked about this last time is If anything is going quote unquote viral and you think it's organic, the likelihood of that is probably low. If it's the number one most, most popular trend at the time, it's very likely that that was at least in some way, shape, or form even allowed, potentially, if that's the word you want to use, instead of being stifled, they at least allow it to happen because it fits their agenda.
And if it didn't fit their agenda, they would slap it with a big misinformation, disinformation, or at the very least, they would shadow ban the content. And so we know that at this point, and as we start to look at more around this, I guess there's even more. situations, but it says, uh, and I wonder if we can look at the response, but that was crazy.
The fact that the Pentagon PSYOP organization within the Pentagon actually came and pitched the idea. They pitched the idea that they could use Taylor Swift to conduct a PSYOP against the American people. That's an, that's actual footage available right now. I had no idea before watching that. And that is.
Just crazy. So as we go back in history, I wanted to start to have a discussion surrounding this and see historically what ways has art and Culture been manipulated by governmental forces to align their agenda with yours. And so we can go back and we can look at this in a few different ways. And historically there has been not only Elvis and Louis Armstrong, but historically there's been many.
Many governments that have done this from Nazi Germany. And I listed a few here after doing some research and under Adolf Hitler, the Nazi regime used music as a propaganda tool to reinforce its ideologies and suppress any opposing or non Germanic. cultural expressions. Jewish musicians and composers were not only banned from performing, but many were also persecuted and sent to concentration camps.
The regime particularly promoted classical composers like Richard Wagner and Ludwig van van van Beethoven, who were seen as epitomizing Aryan and Germanic culture. Music played a pivotal role in Nazi rallies and events being used to evoke emotions of pride and nationalistic fervor among the masses.
Hitler Youth was also heavily indoctrinated with music that promoted Nazi ideology. So there's one. The Soviet government, under Joseph Stalin, reinforced strict control over the arts, including music. Composers like, forgive me, Dmitri Shostakovich and Sergei Prokofiev faced severe restrictions and were often compelled to adapt their compositions to fit the state's demands for music that glorified socialism and the Soviet state.
The government established the Union of Soviet Composers, which played a key role in censoring music and ensuring it adhered to the principles of socialist realism. Music that was considered formalist or bourgeoisie I don't know if I pronounced that right at all, was condemned and composers risked persecution if their work did not align with state ideologies.
You even go back to Footloose, right? If you eliminate music, it has an effect. There's a reason that we sing in church. There's a reason that every religion across every country, across every historical timeframe ever incorporates music because music influences. And so if you can make one person the most influential musician in the world and then utilize them as a puppet to parrot the opinions that you want them to hold that align with your agenda, why wouldn't you do that?
The Cultural Revolution in China is another example. Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution sought to eradicate Chinese traditional culture, including its rich musical heritage. Western classical music was also banned. Instead, the government promoted revolutionary music, particularly the eight model operas that were sanctioned by Zhang Qing, Mao's wife.
Those operas and revolutionary songs were designed to glorify the Communist Party, Mao Zedong's leadership, and the revolutionary spirit of the Chinese people. This was part of a broader attempt to reshape Chinese culture and align it with the Maoist ideology. In another example, people have talked about this before, I'm not sure if there's any evidence of this, just the same way that we can't say there's any evidence of the Taylor Swift Society, but people have talked about how when it comes to black culture in the Late 1980s talking about how rap music and not particularly any type of rap music, but well, I guess particularly a type of rap music, which was the, uh, you know, the violent and drug riddled gang, uh, promoting.
type of rap that became popular. And we even see this today with the Travis Scotts, how much Satanism is incorporated into our music scene today. It's bizarre, but it's not bizarre because it's intentional. And so when you go back to the 80s, even the times where the government was literally pushing crack cocaine into the ghetto areas, low income black communities, the very same time that rap music became what it was, and I love rap.
I even love late 90s or early 90s rap about gangster shit and drugs and gang stuff. But like, it, you can't deny the fact that it influences culture. It influences how people act. It influences how people want to be when they grow up. How do, how, what makes them cool? What type of clothes should they wear?
What should they aspire to? Well When all you hear about in music is selling drugs, making a bunch of money, how good they make you feel and the type of girls that you get when you do it. What do you think you're going to do? Right? It goes hand in hand. Culture is music and music creates culture. And so, um, this goes on and on.
I have other ones which talks about the apartheid South of South Africa. During the apartheid era, the South African government used music as a tool to support its racial segregation policies. Cambodia used it, Iran after the 1979 revolution, North Korea, and North Korea music is used as a tool of state propaganda to an extreme degree.
All music in the country is strictly controlled by the government. Why? Why would they do that? They wouldn't. And of course they wouldn't do that here in the United States of America with us free people. Right? Our government would never do that. Songs are written in North Korea to glorify The Kim family, and the Workers Party of Korea, often incorporating themes of loyalty, patriotism, and devotion to the leaders.
Music is used in schools, workplaces, and public events to instill loyalty to the regime and reinforce its ideologies. There is virtually no exposure at all to international music, and creating or listening to non state approved music can result in severe penalties. And when we talk about severe penalties in North Korea, we're talking about generational imprisonment.
Not just you go to jail. Your sister, your brother, your mother, and your next three generations go to jail. Like, horrible, horrible stuff. And so Music has always been utilized as a weapon by governments, always, and to assume that we're just so far along that our government would never do that, they would never utilize our culture, our music, our art, our movies, against us in a way that would not be in our best interest?
No, they just let us do whatever, and wherever our culture goes, they're perfectly okay with it. Yeah, okay. And, and again, this is going to be an unraveling for everybody, and I think this is maybe a really good next one that we can get into as a society, as we've already unraveled the pharmaceutical industry, the medical industrial complex, the government, the politicians, the big money, the lobbying funds, all of that has happened.
Now, as a society, I think it's time for us to realize that our culture has been infiltrated for decades. The music you listen to, the movies that you watch, the TV shows on Netflix, the articles that you read, the news media that you take in, every single piece of it, the art that you consume, the art on your walls, all of it.
The most famous artists have historically, in some way, shape, or form, and we go back to even the, the, the idea of post modernism. Post modernism is a somewhat new artistic theme, and we're seeing that artistic theme. Play out today in our own culture, culture is shaped by art. So that's where they start, right?
Postmodernism is the idea that there is no true reality. You have your truth. I have my truth and there's no two plus two equals five. And so when you realize that that's what they want to instill in your subconscious so that consciously you accept it when they tell you that a male is not a male. A male is a floating soul with no gender binary, and women are just women, and you can just declare it by standing on top of a desk and saying, I'm a woman now, even if you don't have ovaries or the ability to reproduce.
So that's postmodernism in action, and that's one way that they took art and implemented That subliminal idea into your subconscious so that later it can be activated and weaponized against you. And so you could say, okay, I don't know any examples of that, Austin. I couldn't imagine our CIA working alongside artists.
Well, let me clue you in, my friend. For decades in art circles, it was either a rumor or a joke, but now it is confirmed as fact. The CIA used American modern art, including the works of such artists as such as Jackson Pollock, Robert Motherwell, William de Kooning, and Mark Rothko, right? Oh, a Rothko, right?
You know, like the pretty sure that's like the square and a circle or whatever, as a weapon. In the Cold War. Interesting. In the manner of a renaissance prince, except that it acted secretly, the CIA fostered and promoted American abstract expressionist paintings around the world for more than 20 years.
The connection is improbable. This was a period in the 1950s and 60s when the great majority of Americans disliked or even despised modern art. President Truman summed up a popular view when he said, If that's art, then I'm a Hot, hot and taught. What is a hot and taught as for the artists themselves, many were ex communists, barely acceptable in the American, in the America of the McCarthy era, and certainly not the sort of people normally likely to receive us government backing.
Why did the CIA support them? Because in the propaganda war with the Soviet union, this new artistic movement could be held up as proof of the creativity, the intellectual freedom, and the cultural power of the United States. Russian art strapped into the communist ideological straitjacket could not compete.
So basically what the idea was that our artists, the way of capitalism is just so much better than everything else. This free expression, the environment of freedom and democracy and all of this stuff is so amazing that we just allow brains to thrive. And artistic expression is just so much better here in the United States.
And so they took Upwards of 20, what are they? It's 20 million and purchased this art specifically to prop up. It's like if you, if they funneled money into us companies. Through shell companies so that they could say that, Oh, but look at our democracy. Our organizations, our shell companies are so much more successful than Russian companies, because look at how much money they have.
Well, you gave them the money so you could make that argument. That's the whole point. The existence of the policy rumored and disputed for many years has now been confirmed by the, for the first time by former CIA officials, unknown to the artists, the new American art was secretly promoted under a policy known as the long.
leash arrangement, similar in some ways to the indirect CIA backing of the journal encounter edited by Steven Spender. The decision to include culture and art in the U S cold war arsenal was taken as soon as the CIA was founded in 1947. This made that the appeal communism still have for many intellectuals and artists in the West, the new agency set up a division, the propaganda assets.
Inventory, which at its peak could influence more than 800 newspapers, magazines, and public information organizations. They joked that it was like a Wurlitzer jukebox. When the CIA pushed a button, it could hear whatever tune it wanted to play across the entire. The next key step came in 1950 when the international organizations division was set up under Tom Brayden.
It was this office, which subsidized the animated version of George Orwell's Animal Farm, which sponsored American jazz artists. Opera recitals, the Boston symphonies, orchestra, international touring program. It's agents were placed in the film industry in publishing houses, even as travel writers for the celebrated photo guides.
And we now know it promoted the America's anarchic avant garde movement. Abstract. Expressionism. Initially, more open attempts were made to support the new American art. In 1947, the State Department organized and paid for a touring international exhibition called Advancing American Art, which the aim of rebuting Soviet suggestions that America was a cultural desert.
But the show caused outrage at home, prompting Truman to make his hot and taut remark in one bitter congressman to declare, I am just a dumb American who pays taxes. For this kind of trash, the tour had to be canceled. The U S government now faced a dilemma. The fill in the fill Philistinism combined with Joseph McCarthy's hysterical denunciations of all that was avant garde or unorthodox was deeply embarrassing.
It discredited the idea that America was sophisticated, culturally rich democracy. It also prevented the U S government from consolidating the shift in cultural supremacy from Paris to New York since the 1930s. To resolve the CIA to resolve the dilemma. The CIA was brought in. Hmm. Very interesting Now this goes on and on and on.
This is an article written by independent Independent dot co dot UK and the title of it is modern art was CIA Weapon and it was written written on Sunday the 22nd October of 1995 Super interesting article, I absolutely think that you could dive into more of the history of that, but I just want to give you that background.
That's just one aspect of it, where our CIA has been a part of influencing culture through art. Now we can go into the next part of this, which is called Operation Mockingbird. And Operation Mockingbird was the hand in hand CIA operation between journalists, news networks, and Hollywood. And I myself need to do a deeper dive into this, but I had just recalled about this when talking about the Taylor Swift conversation and honestly, I didn't think this conversation would go that long.
I usually have some warm up articles sometimes before I get into the deep stuff, but man, this is so interesting to me that I think we could probably sit here for five hours and talk about this. But it really is a culture death. You go back and listen to music, go back and listen to Led Zeppelin, go listen to a CDC, go listen to any of the, the great musicians of the 1970s and early eighties before the, the, the, the fingertips of the CIA started to get into our music and.
We have done nothing but go downhill as a society musically. There's very few examples that you can give me that would even rival any of that. The very first, I'll give you a side story, go down the memory lane real quick. When I was maybe, oh, I don't know, 8 years old, 8 to 10 years old probably, my grandparents, Took me on a train ride to Chicago from Detroit to go see my cousins And I had just gotten for the train ride a new Walkman.
I believe it was a gray Sony Walkman and My dad took me to go get my very first CD for my Walkman and I ended up getting the Led Zeppelin discography So all I listened to for probably Six months was every Led Zeppelin song ever and that is still to this day my favorite album I have the vinyl upstairs right now that I listen to greatest band of all time in my opinion anyways Trip down memory lane, so We have had a cultural death an artistic death here in the United States that has been unfolding for decades you even want to talk about architecture and I would love to do an interview with somebody who could speak more on this because I'm not an architect and I don't know the history of architecture But to me you go back and you look at even go back and look at Roman times Greek times go back and look at the Gothic eras and and go back and look at Pyramids like there go back and look at any history of time in the last 2000 years, and you will see if you took a time machine every 100 years, you would see beautiful architecture, cathedrals, and and political buildings and and courthouses and schools and all of these things are so beautifully created because when people used to create architecture, they used to do it to, to please the gods.
They used to do it because there's a frequency within the building that you're in. And when you walk up to it and go through that door, there's a feeling that should be associated with that. And that is dead in the United States. Go drive your car around and the only thing you're going to see is a box and a box and a bigger box and a taller box and a wider box and you drive your box by the boxes and you see the boxes and you walk home to your box and you open up the box door to get into your box room to go into your box kitchen to create something in your box oven and pull something out of the box fridge to It's an endless cycle of squares in, in our culture, in our architecture.
And it's, it's so sad to me to see that we just, that that's what we live in today. And so when we look at whether it's Project Mockingbird, whether we look at the CIA working hand in hand with the art within the Cold War, whether we talk about the, the historical aspects of music. There has been nothing but death of creativity in the United States.
Every piece of culture that has been brought here has slowly dwindled and died, and it seems to me like it died at the hands of the organizations that are being funded by our tax dollars so that they can diminish our creativity, and so that they can control You are subconscious, and I think bringing it full circle back around to Taylor Swift is that's exactly what has happened.
Here and now I do have a full article on the project Mockingbird. Let's see how far into this Well, we did 38 minutes on Taylor Swift
So I think we can move on but I did find a substack article because it was actually a little bit interesting It's called a media manipulation the operation Mockingbird. It was written October 14th 2024 and it is from the reveal revealed. I Substack so revealed I dot substack. com and it looks like they do a pretty I don't know decent breakdown I haven't read through it all yet, but I think 38 minutes on on Media manipulation and Taylor Swift is probably a good start.
So On your own time, feel free to go watch that. Here's a quick video on Project Mockingbird. Then we'll move on
real concern That planted story is intended to serve a national purpose abroad Came home And were circulated here, and believed here.
Because, uh, this would mean that the CIA could manipulate the news in the United States by channeling it through some foreign country. And we're looking at that very carefully. Do you have any people being paid by the CIA who are contributing to a major circulation American journal? We do have people who submit pieces to other, to American journals.
Do you have any people paid by the CIA who are working for television networks? This, I think, gets into the kind of, uh, getting into the details, Mr. Chairman, that I'd like to get into in an executive session. Uh, at CBS, uh, we, uh, Had been contacted by the CIA. As a matter of fact, by the time I became the head of the whole news and public affairs operation in 1954.
Ships had been established and I was told about them and asked if I'd carry on with them. We have quite a lot of detailed information, uh, and we will evaluate it and we will include any, um, evidence of wrongdoing or any evidence of impropriety in our final report and make recommendations. Do you have any people being paid by the CIA who are contributing to the National News Services, AP and UPI?
Well, again, I think we're getting into the kind of detail, Mr. Chairman, that I'd prefer to handle in an executive session. Senator, do you think you named the new plan? So the answer is yes. Uh, that remains to be decided. I think it was entirely in order for our correspondents at that time, uh, to make use of, uh, C.
I. A. agent, uh, chiefs, uh, of station and other members of the executive staff of C. I. A. as source. Alright, so there you have it. You can go, uh, read it through the article there, um, find it on Substack, uh, reveal. i. substack. com. Alright, so, let's move on. on from that into the next topic, which is going to be that in New York over the past few days, there has been a A bit of a debacle and one specifically between the Hasidic Jewish community in New York and the New York police.
So the New York police showed up to a synagogue in, let's see here, let me go ahead and pull it up.
All right. Basically what happened is the police showed up and they decided that they needed to shut down a underground. Tunnel system in New York, underneath a place of worship where these Hasidic Jews would go and congregate. And the idea behind this, the mainstream narrative is that the secret underground synagogue tunnels were causing destabilization of the buildings that were surrounding it.
So that's the mainstream narrative that's come out in the last day or so. And nine of these Jews were arrested. And now I do want to preempt this with. Love my Jewish family. I'm not Jewish, so I don't technically have Jewish family, but you know what I mean? Love Jewish people. I love Christian people. I love Muslim people.
I have no affinity towards any one class over the other. I have my own personal spiritual beliefs. I don't think that any religious beliefs in and of themselves make you a great or a bad person. I believe that there's Terrible people who are Jewish, and there's great people that are Jewish, there's terrible people who are Christians, there's great people that are Christians, there's terrible people who are Muslims, and there's great people who are Muslims.
I've met them all. Mostly good people across the board. I can't even look at one and be like, Hey, I've met a bunch of people in this. No, every religion has bad apples. Just like you can say, you know, there's a bunch of people who say, Oh, police are bad. No, they're not bad. There's bad people everywhere in every occupation, religion, uh, country, uh, whatever it is.
There's bad people everywhere, in every type of thing, but mostly people are good, mostly people intend good, and I, so, there's your disclaimer, as we go into this, because it's a very, um, very sensitive time, for this specific culture, and I get that, and so, I'm just going to preempt that. There's your disclaimer.
All right. Now, everything from here forward is just me talking, but, uh, understand it from that framework. Um, so just as we were discussing, there has been a Jewish synagogue. That was creating underground tunnels. They were digging, digging, digging underground tunnels. And so the idea from the Jewish community that was there, and this is a very specific Jewish community.
It's the Hasidic Jews, the, uh, I can see if I can pull up the exact names of them here for you. Cause it, it does matter because the specific culture is known for having to deal with some very specific, uh, um, pushback in certain situations in this small area. So this specific. Uh, Jewish culture, I believe is a, um, more Orthodox culture and I actually have a whole thing here, but to me, it's of Russian descent and So here's the general idea is that they were digging these holes and they claim that they were digging these holes because they were six.
They started digging these holes six months ago because of the COVID restrictions or they dug them during COVID because they wanted to Uh, congregate and practice their faith during a time where they were being told, no, you cannot do that. Okay. Now there's a secondary theory, which is that they are digging these tunnels because the person that they, the, the, the Messiah, I believe that they believe in says that you have to consistently expand your place of worship.
And maybe I'm getting that wrong because we'll get into a thread here in just a moment. Um, but let's, let's dive into the timeline of this. So on January 8th, videos circulated that showed a tunnel network under the Lubavitch, that's the specific one, the Lubavitch HQ in Crown Heights and several Jewish men being arrested.
More videos show another Jewish man escaping through another tunnel and a group. resisting officers. The building was shut down afterwards. Initially, the claim was that the tunnels were made to pray during COVID. This, according to this thread, okay, and this thread is not, this is not CNN. This is not Fox.
This is not, um, it's not a news organization. So In, I guess, everything you hear from every organization because I'm talking about those two, too. I wouldn't believe Fox or CNN on everything either, but this is the individual account on X, so take it with a grain of salt, but this seemed to be the most, uh, factually and organized article that I could find on this.
It says initially the claim was the tunnels were made to pray during COVID. This is most likely false. Neighbor with Mikva access, as of six months ago, no work on the tunnel had begun. Since renovation was the main reason the tunnels were noticed, they could have Um, and now they add some receipts here, which says that the tunnel found burrowed under the women's section of 770, possibly destabilizing the building.
And there's three, four other articles that are attached to this to back up the idea that they were just stating there. And so the next thing that it states here as we go into that, and so that's the, the general idea is that they were saying, Oh, we were doing this. During COVID because we weren't allowed to worship.
Well, it seems to be that that was according to this false because these tunnels weren't started, but six months ago now where it really started to get some fuel on the fire is during one of these videos, as these people are. Resisting arrest. There was a, quite the scene. They're flipping over pews and creating these wall barriers as the police are grabbing them and they're pushing back and forth.
And like this, this, the whole chaos ensuing inside of the synagogue. And as that's happening, a guy is breaking down the walls and like a police officer is like, or is breaking down the walls and starting to pull people out of it. And one of the, the, um, Jewish people that are there pull out a mattress and on this mattress, this is a soiled mattress that looks to be whether it's old blood or, uh, feces or something that's on this mattress.
And it seems to be a small mattress. Um, Uh, that some people were saying was meant for, uh, a child and that's kind of what it looks like. Okay. But we won't make any assumptions yet, but that's, that's what's probably one of the biggest fuels of the fire. Now, the other thing that was very questionable about the situation is one of the people, one of the Jewish guys was escaping and he went through the tunnel system and he came up, right?
Next to a child's museum. Hmm. Now that's not to say that there's children in the museum, but it is to say that the museum is meant for children. And so there has been theories that these individuals were using this for some sort of human trafficking. Okay. Now again, unfounded, a couple of weird coincidences and.
Here's the side part. If these people were just digging tunnels so that they could pray during COVID, more power to them. That's awesome. You should do that. Fuck the government. They can't tell you what you can and cannot do, especially when it comes to your religious practices. So, wholeheartedly believe that.
If that's what they were doing, awesome. They should do it. Um, but, there's a lot of skepticism around maybe some more nefarious reasons why this was happening. And so, as we go deeper into this thread and deeper into this article, It starts to talk about some of those things. It talks about the mattress, talks about the, um, the pushing and shoving that ensued, I believe nine people total were arrested that were a part of this synagogue.
so the next portion of this says, The contents of the tunnel are very disturbing and don't seem like items extremists students would keep. A mattress with a dark stain was found. A baby high chair? Was found as well. So that's a weird one. The crowd protecting the tunnels isn't small. They are also aren't of student age.
Here's the full video of the tunnel network that we have access to. The video shows passageways that extend that aren't explored. It's unclear whether the other passages might contain does this tunnel network look like something done in six months? So it's absolutely does not look like something done in six months.
So let me share this with you here. Um, this is. It looks old, almost, to me. It looks like it's been used. There's, there's like, old chipped paint hanging off of door frames, and there's a big, uh, like, sand Let me go ahead and expand this for you here, but there's the, the high chair, there's what looks like some wheel barrels, a bunch of just stuff thrown around, cinder blocks thrown around some carved little tunnel doorways that they're crawling into now with a flashlight.
And so as they walk back, it's just a crawl space now, essentially from the more. Substantial part of it that is where could have been where that person came up into that right right outside of that Children's Museum. So that's bizarre. I don't think this was built six months ago. Again, I'm not a archaeologist or whatever the hell you need to be to date that stuff.
But it says where does the tunnel exit to using geomapping one of the tunnels exit near the local Children's Museum. It's also unclear how large the tunnel network is and where the other passages lead. As more information comes in, we will know how extensive the network is. And they show you the photos as to how they know this.
This is where the video where the guy came out of it. This is the photo where they actually found that same portion of it. Um, discussion of the tunnels online has been avoided by many accounts. Some accounts claimed the tunnels were even fake. Israel War Room labeled such discussions of the tunnel anti Semitic.
They claim that it's just a simple building code violation. Hmm, then why are we getting in, like, fights and arrested over building code violations? You get a fine for that. You don't get arrested. You don't get into pushing, shoving matches with the police over building codes. It says the label conspiracy theorist has been applied to people who believe tunnels could have been used to harm kids.
No explanation has been given for the stained mattress and baby high chair in the tunnels. Is the conspiracy or is there more to the Brooklyn community? Research reveals a dark history of sexual assault in the Brooklyn area. If you do speak out about it, you are shunned from the community and harassed.
Disturbing testimony in the article speculates that the number of young boys sexually assaulted could be as high as 50%. The community is, and there's four different articles that it attaches there. The community is very secretive and will oftentimes cover up or silence people who have been assaulted.
The community is very religious and strict. If you go against the grain, the community turns against you. Hmm. And they have a video about this specific here with a religious look at the Satmar sect. John, good morning. Good morning. Fascinating case. And it's a case that's being watched closely Anthony, not just because of the allegation that a trusted community leader sexually abused a young girl.
He was assigned to help, but also because the trial has.
Hmm. Okay. So it sounded like maybe a different name of a different sect. That he was mentioning here, but within the Brooklyn area, a specific Jewish Pull back the veil, concealing the inner workings of a closed community. The trial of the Alright. So, here's shuns those who have been traumatized. They send threats to the survivors, harass them, and have total control over their lives.
Police confirm it is very tough to get convictions and to have victims. While we wait for more information, here are some of the questions I and many others have about the tunnels. What was the liquid on the stained mattress? Why was there a baby high chair in the tunnel? Has a full forensic analysis been performed in the area?
Where does the tunnels lead? Hmm. All good questions. Do any security cameras have clear view of entrances to the tunnels? If so, have they been subpoenaed? Have there been any people who reported this before the renovations in December 2023? Who anonymously tipped off the fire department? Who used the tunnels?
How many minors entered the tunnels? Have any minors displayed behavior of a survivor upon exiting the tunnels? Okay, this is like, it's very specific. So, there's, there's the thread for you. Now, as we go into the culture surrounding this community that we are referencing here, which again is not just the normal Orthodox Judaism, it's not, um, it's a specific religious sect within Brooklyn.
It's a very small, tight knit community, um, that are, uh, uh, uh, uh, Hasidic, uh, Yadkivik, right? Is that the name of it? So, very specific, uh, religious sect. So it says, okay. Once upon a time, it says, okay, for real. Once upon a time in Eastern Europe, a movement called Shabbat was founded. Its founder was Rabbi Schnur Zalman of Laity.
This was in 1812. He was many things, among them a genius, Talmudist, and rabbi, the Kalbalist and mystic, and the rarest of things, a true original thinker. A Kabbalist, sorry, a Talmudist, meaning he follows the Talmud, um, and a rabbi and a Kabbalist and a mystic. So, there is a really interesting conversation surrounding the mystical Judaism, uh, there is a whole subsection of, of Judaism, uh, and historically much more prevalent.
Back then, but that believed in mysticism and there is certain sections of this that still do, but like literal magic, um, while a true original of, and one of, in my opinion, the greatest philosophers and theologians in the history of humankind, he was also profoundly devoted to his own teachers in the Hasidic tradition and saw himself as the natural successor.
The Hasidic tradition was founded a couple of generations earlier, and one of the prophecies is connection and devotion to a master in Hasidic parlance above all. Hasidism love and devote themselves to their rabbi as the one who helps connect the soul of the Jew with godliness. Okay, sounds a little bit like Catholicism, right?
The aspect of Hasidic Judaism made into a lesser extent continues to make some people nervous. However, it has also been extremely thoroughly defended and broadly accepted as a legitimate manifestation of Judaism, which always has its Moses, Rabbi Akiva, and Vilna. And again, this is a single account. This isn't a religious text.
This isn't a official person that is sitting here giving me this information, but it is, seems to be pretty legit to me. Um, but I haven't done a ton of research on the theology behind Hasidic mystic Judaism. Um, Rabbi, Rabbi Schnur Shabbat, uh, Rabbi Schnur Zalman Shabbat movement. So it's the Shabbat.
Hasidic Judaism is one movement within a much broader Hasidic world full of dynasties of Rees, which each of their own rich traditions in ways, and it's R-E-B-B-E-S, not rabbis, although it is not a widely studied, they're al always emphasized point has has Hasidism Hasidism as part of their devotion.
Generally see their rabbi as a Masonic figure. The word is loaded and makes people extremely uncomfortable. It may worth pausing briefly to explain that Hasidism is seen by, um, the founding of the movement as a redemptive revelation of Torah, a movement whose original Geist is to raise the Jewish people from the spiritual and physical malaise of exile and return them to their deepest soul and identity, a holy nation.
with God. The more that holiness and redemptive soul is brought into the world, the more the time of the general redemption, the macronism of that inner redemption draws near. The rabbi is a Torah of flesh and blood, that general reality in state instantiated in a holy and saintly individual. Uh, so much for the brief explanation.
They said fast forward to the 20th century, the descendant of Rabbi Schnur Zalman, Rabbi Joseph Yitzhak of Lubavitch survives imprisonment. and near execution by the KGB in the Nazi bombing of Warsaw, and after much deliberation, moves to New York City. Wow, that's wild. the known reasons for this choice are varied.
Some are spiritual, New York becoming a center of influence on world Jewry. Not sure that's a word. Um, and some are very pragmatic. The Jews of the U. S. are already monetarily feeding most of the Eastern Bloc Jewry. Thus, the sixth Lubavitcher rabbi, Lubavitch is a tiny town in Belarus that has the home of the longest surviving branch of the Shabbat movement, um, comes to Brooklyn and moves into 770 Eastern Parkway in Crown Heights.
The sixth rabbi passes away in 1950 and is succeeded by his son in law and distant cousin, Rabbi Menchem, Mendel Schneerson. In 1951, though he doesn't live in the building, 770 is where his office is located and remains the HQ of the Shabab movement. Now you have to understand the Shabab movement in the U.
S. in 1951 can practically fit into a single small room. It is a tiny poor immigrant community, remnants of a world for that the Nazis and Bolsheviks destroyed between them. They had nothing, no resources, no connections, barely any English, a tiny immigrant community in what was then a prestigious middle class Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn.
What they got in 1951, however, was capital L leadership. Not sure what that means. The 7th Rebbi, henceforth the Rebbi, declares in his first official speech as Rebbi that this is the generation that will bring a final end to exile and usher in the messianic age. He declares this about a long room full of people.
He then sets about changing world Jewry. Again, don't know if that's a word. Books could be written about the Rebbi and have been, but suffice to say the Rebbi creates from nothing a mass movement devoting to hunting down and love the Jews that Hitler hunted and hatred. I'm not going to read all of it.
hunting down in love, the Jews that hunter, that Hitler hunted in hatred with bringing Torah and mitzvoth, in love. The commandments to every single Jew. Shabbat centers, so it sounds like they're trying to just expand among all of the Jewish people. Shabbat centers with no central funding whatsoever, by the way, are opened all over the world.
The rabbi pushes and pushes for a single Jew to perform a single commandment. He seeks to revive a broken and orphaned generation. He expands Shabbat and massive global movement. All of this is just an atheist, know nothing All of this is just what an atheist know nothing can appreciate about the Rebbe.
He barely slept and was totally publicly devoted to other people for decades. Stories of Jews and non Jews meeting with him are countless, and always he emphases the imminent redemption and how to get there. Okay, now it says we get to the sensitive part of the story, but I'm going to try to stick to simple public fact.
The Rebbe's emphasis on, um, The Messiah grows greater and greater in his final years of leadership. The Rebbe passes away in 1994. The Rebbe's Hasidism very much believed, and believe, that if anyone in this generation was a candidate to become the final Redeemer according to Jewish law and tradition, it was and is the Lubavitcher Rebbe.
However, following the Rebbe's passing, as the dust settles, there is a bit of a split. Some hedonism fervently believe that spreading the awareness of the Rebbe as the Redeemer is a core part of bringing about the Redemption. They are the Masik, Mes, Mesh, Ikitism. M E S H I C H I S T I M. Their flag is yellow and ubiquitous.
The majority of Hasidism and ever growing consolidated core of Shabbat official organs believe that this is not the Rebbe's will. Okay. Um. Now another issue, 770, the home and place, let's see if there's anything specific we want to get into here. Uh, now you know a lot about a certain subsection of Jewish culture that you probably never needed to know so much about.
Um, another thing you should know is that even beyond the, by now, old distinction between, uh, the maschicatism and the anti S, as they are known, Shabbat is highly decentralized and full of typical politics. Territorialism fights over money and all sorts of very human issues. Okay, uh, let's see what else.
Um, this person is very thorough in their study of this. Um, and so, to the current contremps, you have a global, decentralized, massively successful organization that runs charities and synagogues and helps Jews with problems, physical and spiritual, all over the world with an official HQ partially occupied by something like a street gang.
Sounds like we missed that part, but I'm not going to go back for you. Um, and so, uh, This basically just says they're not above violence to claim their own turf. There's a big turf war between that split off between one subsection of this and the other subsection. In any case, this week, the actual ownership of 7770 called the cement trucks to repair this damage and stop the progress on the expansionism.
Um Interesting.
Uh, basically it says that as a result of this expansionism and taking over this territory, they wanted to, uh, start breaking into, uh, the, the, so basically one portion of this subsection lives in the top floor and one portion lives on the bottom floor. And so, uh, you have a global decentralized, right?
Like a streaking. This, uh, Fat Tim. have taken upon themselves in recent months unilaterally to expand 770. Their way was doing was starting to break into an adjoining basement. The main synagogue of 770 is in the basement and old decommissioned ritual bath. Or mitzvah. 770 is indeed, which a mikvah is basically where you're supposed to go bath, bathe yourselves.
Women are supposed to go there before they have their period. Men are supposed to go there before and after they have sex. It's like a, it's like you cleanse yourself in this area. Um, 770 is, Uh, is indeed far too small for the massive number of people who wish to pray there, study there, or something that more and more Hasidism have been seeking a proper solution to for years.
However, a bunch of teenagers breaking down walls in their free time, you be the judge. In any case, this week, the actual ownership of 770 called in the cement trucks to repair this damage and stop the progress on the expansion. Um, the Fatim responded territorially, the police became involved, and you have videos of Yeshiva students escaping arrest through sewer gates.
I think that's most of the factual context. You're welcome. Wow! Uh, okay. Super super interesting. Uh, if you wish to read more about these topics, here are some good books. The Philosophy of Shabbat by Rabbi Nisan Mindel, The Rebbe's Army by Sue Fishcough, and Rebbe by Josef Tolskien. Hmmm. Very interesting.
Uh, the broad interest in this story on Twitter and beyond is largely antisemitic with filth like this, uh, is a dime a dozen. Looks like something was, uh, deleted there. Um, interesting. Okay. So this makes much more sense to me and I think was probably. important to actually get into the details on, uh, then, uh, then long term human trafficking under the streets of New York.
Uh, so we have come to a conclusion and that is I vote. Not human trafficking. That is my, that is my conclusion here. I have debunked this, uh, maybe not completely, but it seems much more likely that that was the case, is that there's a bunch of territorial, uh, Jew fights going on and they're fighting over territory and expanding their territory and the landlord called on them and they were digging into the basement and now we see what we have.
A little weird that there was a high chair. There, so there's your competing threads, I guess, and one thread being these, uh, this Jewish sect is creating underground tunnels for human trafficking, the other one being this is a territory war between very somewhat poor, um, and, uh, emotionally charged organizations for territory.
Um, so that, that seems to make a lot more sense to me guys than, than underground human trafficking. Jewish rabbis. I don't know. Um, but there is some articles out there of, of, you know, just as you can find for Christians and Catholics of wrongdoings, which if that's the, the ruler that you measure everybody's affiliations by, then you can basically say that everybody is running a human trafficking organization then, I guess.
All right, so let's move on. The last thing that we're going to talk about, and we're going to talk about this somewhat briefly, is the fact that, uh, and let me go ahead and actually just pull this article up, because I haven't been, I haven't had time to read through this completely yet, because this just happened.
So, this is breaking news, is the fact that the United States and the UK coalition conducted a strike on Houthi rebels. A joint strike, and So, as this article loads, we'll learn more and more, but I guess the, the, uh, the concern around this is that the reason that, the concern around this is obviously that the Houthi rebels are backed by Iran.
Right? So, this is, this comes from Fox News, and it says, hold
this over a little bit. Alright, this comes from Fox News, where it says, as it loaded and unloaded on me, um, That the U. S. and U. K. coalition strike Iran backed Houthi targets in Yemen after spat of ship attacks in the Red Sea. So you've been hearing this back and forth, right? The drone strikes, and the aircraft carriers shooting down the drones, and all of this has been going on with these rebel militants that are backed by Iran.
And so what I think is interesting is it's always Iran backed militants. Is, is, are Ukraine, in every article by Russia, U. S. backed? Ukrainian militants? Do they? I'm sure they understand the proxy war just as much there as we do here, right? So if we're calling that every single thing, it's not it's not a war with Houthi rebels.
It's a war with Iran. And that's what they're preempting for us. And that's that's what the priming that we're seeing here is before they put Houthi, they put Iran backed and that's for a reason. So Yemen's Iran backed Houthi militants have stepped up attacks or commercial on commercial vessels in the Red Sea and
It says the United States and Britain carried out a series of strikes on military organizations and locations belonging to Iran backed Houthis in Yemen early Friday in response to militant groups ongoing attacks on vessels traveling through the Red Sea. Fox News is told that there were attacks on more than a dozen Houthi targets by air, surface, and subsurface platforms.
The attacks were carried out with support from Australia, Netherlands, Iran and Canada, a U. S. defense official says the U. K. contributed aircraft. President Biden said he'd authorize strikes in direct response to unprecedented Houthi attacks against the International Maritime Vessels in the Red Sea, including the use of anti ship ballistic missiles for the very first time in history.
These Houthi attacks, Biden said, have endangered U. S. personnel and its allies and have threatened freedom of navigation. These targeted strikes are a clear message that the United States and our partners will not tolerate attacks on our personnel or allow hostile actors to imperil freedom of navigation in one of the world's most critical commercial routes.
I would love to hear President Biden say imperil freedom of navigation together. That would be impressive. I will not hesitate. He said to direct further measurements to protect our people. And the free flow of international commerce as necessary. The strikes came shortly after the White House called a lid on President Biden's engagements for the evening as he was not expected to discuss the matter publicly.
It follows news that the Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin had not notified the President or other officials of his whereabouts for several days. Okay. A joint statement from the government basically said that the strikes were intended to disrupt and degrade the abilities of the Houthis use to threaten global trade and the lives of international mariners.
Okay, um, the big question people have around this is the concern of getting into an engagement with Iran. That seems to be on everybody's mind, because if Iran steps in, right, then then the domino effect happens, then China could invade Taiwan simultaneously, as we're in this engagement with Iran, and then Russia and in the invasion in Ukraine, and then, right, you have all these these These pieces right when you play chess you move pieces in a position so that the second the You can cause a break that you're ready to go right you move your your Rook into a certain position so that he both has a defensive position and an offensive position But maybe you leave him there for ten moves Right?
Maybe you get you give him some time while you put other pieces in position, and then there's always a certain time in chess where all hell breaks loose, right? At least when I play, I'm not the greatest chess player, but I enjoy it. But it always seems like it's like waiting, waiting, waiting, go. And I think that could be what people are concerned about here is that we're seeing this waiting.
And the second that the the The second the United States begins, excuse me, the second the United States begins an engagement with anybody, then we're divided amongst several, several positions at one time and that's not a good thing. So the response to this by Hezbollah, the Hezbollah could strike in U.
S., Intel officials warn and this is at the same exact time. Time. Lebanese terror group Hezbollah may attack American troops or diplomats abroad, or even strike the United States at home, officials told Political Wednesday. Hezbollah could draw on the capability they have to put people in places to do something, i.
e. easy immigration into the United States. It is something to be worried about, that official, as well as three other anonymous ones that publication cited. Said that the Iran backed group would likely hit American targets abroad first. The terror group was more capabilities than others in the region, according to the officials, such as a more expansive international network.
Many officials in President Joe Biden's administration do not believe that Iran wants a broader war, but they have been working to decrease tensions in the Middle East. Still, recent events have contributed to fears that the conflict between Israel and Hamas could spread into surrounding countries into the Middle East.
Along with its campaign in Gaza, the Jewish state has exchanged fire with Hezbollah since Hamas October 7th terror attacks. On Tuesday, Hezbollah hit an Israeli base using drones, and the Israel Defense Forces killed three of the terror group's members in southern Lebanon. Hezbollah has said recent attacks on the Jewish state are part of a response to its apparent killing of a Hamas.
FBI Director Christopher Wray said in early December that the general threat for foreign terrorist organizations has evaluated since October 7th and elevated, telling a Senate panel that he saw blinking lights everywhere I turn.
Interesting.
Very interesting. In, uh, 1983, Hezbollah conducted bombings of the U. S. embassy and marine barracks in Lebanon during the country's civil war, which saw Israel invade it a year. Now, one thing that's interesting about this, as we go back, is that, uh, and this comes from the Post Millennial, as I was doing some research on this, it says, Trump designated Yemen's Houthis as terrorists.
One day after taking office, Biden reversed it. So, the same organization that, you know, we're talking, we, we are, Now engaging in warfare against Donald Trump had them identified and designated as a terrorist organization. And Biden said, no, no, no, not that. And now all of a sudden we're, you know, bombing them.
Um, so found that to be interesting. I guess we'll have to wait and see. I'm not going to dive into that article. If you want to go read it, you can go to the post millennial. But that, my friends, is a scary potential, but I've said this before, and I'll continue saying it, you know, be prepared for whatever.
Live your life as if nothing's going to happen, but be prepared if it does. And so, There, there is some very serious engagements that are happening. I don't know what to make of this one yet. We've just heard about it today. Time will tell, but until next time, don't listen to Taylor Swift. Put on some Led Zeppelin.
Hope that Travis Kelsey drops the ball. And if you are in New York and you see a man with a, uh, a, um, you see a Jewish man pop up from a sewer. Don't worry. They're just in a territory dispute with their neighbors. All right, guys. Thank you so much for listening. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart.
Head over sign up for the substack austin Adams dot substack. com. You will be getting some emails. More recently, I just brought on somebody new to help out with that stuff for me so that we can get more content out to you guys. Uh, Anyways, subscribe, leave a five star review, and have a wonderful day.
Thank you.
Adam's Archive. Adam's Archive.
- Mostrar mais
