Episódios
-
The plaintiff bought a painting from the defendant, and when he got home and compared it to the Craigslist ad, he noticed the colors were way off. The plaintiff asked for a refund, but the defendant refused, so he is suing to get his money back. The defendant says the plaintiff bought a very specific painting, and he seemed satisfied when she delivered it.
The plaintiff hired the defendant to fix a dent in his car. However, the plaintiff claims the defendant lost his car key, which is expensive to replace, so he is suing. The defendant says he doesn’t owe the plaintiff because he fixed the car and left the key in the cupholder just like he told him.
The plaintiffs rented a house from the defendant. When they moved out, the plaintiffs claim the defendant illegally withheld their security deposit and billed them for smoke damage even though the defendant knew they were smokers when they signed the lease. The plaintiffs believe the defendant is just trying to take advantage of them, so they’re suing. The defendant insists the plaintiffs caused extensive damage, and he’s countersuing for additional repairs.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff says the defendant hit her tiny dog with a cane, and the dog ended up losing an eye. Her dog had one surgery already and needs at least two more. She’s suing for vet bills. The defendant argues the dog lunged at him while he was walking his dog, so he was just protecting himself.
Then, the plaintiff brought her expensive designer watch to the defendant’s jewelry store to get it fixed. She claims the defendant lost an important screw and damaged the watch while he was repairing it, so she needed to bring it to the designer for better repairs. She’s suing for the cost of the repairs. The defendant admits he lost the screw and offered to get her a new one, but she left before he could do it.
Plus, the plaintiff used to rent a home from the defendant. He says the roof collapsed on him and his wife, but the defendant still won’t return his security deposit, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff left the place in a complete mess, so she doesn’t owe him anything.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
Estão a faltar episódios?
-
The plaintiff is an entertainer and recording artist. He says he hired the defendant, a publicist, because he promised the plaintiff exposure and magazine shoots. However, the plaintiff claims the defendant is a scammer who didn’t help him with his career at all, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant insists he worked very hard to get the plaintiff’s name out there. It takes years to a build a career, and the defendant believes the plaintiff is just impatient.
The plaintiff has known the defendant since he was in elementary school, and she hired him to do some flooring in her house. Unfortunately, the plaintiff claims the defendant didn’t know what he was doing and damaged her floor and furniture, so she is suing. The defendant insists he’s a union carpenter who properly installed the floors, so he denies owing her anything.
The plaintiffs rented an apartment in the defendant’s house, but they say the defendant failed to notify them that a registered pedophile lived next door. Since the plaintiffs have two small children, they decided it was unacceptable and didn’t want to live there anymore. The plaintiffs are suing for rent money paid, as well as the security deposit. The defendant insists the plaintiffs are responsible for checking who the neighbors are.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff shared an apartment with the defendant, but the plaintiff says the defendant’s boyfriend practically lived there. The plaintiff couldn’t take it anymore, so she moved out. Unfortunately, the plaintiff says the defendant owes her money for a security deposit and unreturned belongings, so she’s suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff is a control freak, and she moved out without any notice. The defendant is countersuing for a real estate broker’s fee.
Then, the plaintiff bought a truck from the defendant, and the guy assured her the transmission was in perfect shape. However, 15 minutes later, the plaintiff says the vehicle broke down, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant says the plaintiff dropped off the truck on his property, blocking other vehicles in his driveway, so he is countersuing for storage and towing charges.
Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to repair a leak in his room. The plaintiff claims the defendant botched the job, and his ceiling is now destroyed, so he’s suing. The defendant claims he properly fixed everything he was hired to do, and the plaintiff should sue whoever worked on the roof, not him.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff lived in the defendant’s rental property and claims she paid for various improvements the defendant agreed to reimburse her for. Unfortunately, the plaintiff claims the defendant hasn’t paid her back, so she’s suing. The defendant says the plaintiff is a close family member, and he denies owing her anything.
Then, the plaintiff says the defendant made a deal to sell herbal tea through his Facebook group and promised him an $885 profit on a $1,000 investment. However, the plaintiff claims the defendant scammed him, and he never got the profit, so he’s suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff jumped the gun, and the product is still selling.
Plus, the plaintiff purchased a van, and it came with a warranty from the defendant. When the van broke down, the plaintiff claims the defendant didn’t honor the warranty, and he was forced to spend big money on a new engine, so he’s suing for the repairs. The defendant says he tried to help the plaintiff, and he denies owing him anything.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff hired the defendant’s moving company and claims he damaged two pieces of her bedroom set, so she’s suing. The defendant says the plaintiff didn’t inform him about the damage until days after the move, and he denies owing her anything.
Then, the plaintiffs gave the defendant money to hold onto for safekeeping while their bedroom was being painted. The defendant then told the plaintiffs the money was stolen by a thief, but the plaintiffs don’t believe her, so they’re suing. The defendant insists a robber did steal the money, and she even filed a police report.
Plus, the plaintiff says the defendants were tenants of hers, but they were a nightmare to deal with. The plaintiff alleges they damaged the house and didn’t pay the last month’s rent or the water bill, so she’s suing. The defendants insist the plaintiff was the real nightmare, and she has a reputation of illegally withholding security deposits.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff claims his good friend of seven years won’t pay him the balance she owes on a TV he sold her, so he’s suing. The defendant alleges the plaintiff told her it was a gift. The defendant believes the plaintiff is only chasing her down for the money because they don’t spend time together as often.
Then, the plaintiff says the defendant, her former roommate, owes her money for utilities, so she’s suing. The defendant insists the plaintiff conjured up this lawsuit out of the blue, and he denies owing her anything
Plus, the plaintiff hired and paid the defendant to build her a new deck. Unfortunately, the plaintiff claims the defendant took off with her money and never did the job, so she’s suing. The defendant insists he told the plaintiff it was going to take time to obtain the permit for the deck, and all of a sudden, she changed her mind and demanded her money back.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff and the defendant were in a relationship for almost six years. While they were together, the plaintiff claims she gave the defendant money so he could bail his nephew out of jail. The defendant hasn’t paid the plaintiff back, so she’s suing him to get her money back. During their relationship, the defendant says he felt like the plaintiff’s personal ATM because he paid for everything, so he believes he shouldn’t have to pay her back.
Then, the plaintiff alleges the defendant illegally towed his car, scratched his bumper in the process, and charged him an outrageous fee, so he’s suing. The defendant insists he had every right to tow the plaintiff’s car because it was illegally parked.
Plus, the plaintiff purchased granite from the defendant and had him install it in her kitchen. However, over time, the plaintiff claims the granite turned black, so she’s suing for a refund because she believes it was defective. The defendant insists he has never seen anything like this in his 30-year career, and he believes the plaintiff didn’t maintain the countertops properly.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff says he and the defendant used to be in a relationship and lived together until the defendant kicked him out. The plaintiff claims while they were together, he paid for a car, phone, and nail clippers that she hasn’t returned, so he’s suing. The defendant denies owing the defendant anything and insists she owns the car.
Then, the plaintiffs rented an apartment from the defendant. Soon after moving in, the plaintiffs say the building inspector condemned the place, and they were forced to move again, so they’re suing for their security deposit. However, the defendant insists the plaintiffs had the building wrongly condemned and moved out of the blue.
Plus, the plaintiff gave the defendant a deposit on a sofa bed, which initially cost $399. After the defendant took the deposit, the plaintiff claims he upped the price and said the sofa would cost $499. The plaintiff demanded her deposit back, but he refused, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant insists the plaintiff purchased the sofa bed on layaway, and then she said she didn’t have the money to pay off the bed.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff bought an iPhone on eBay from the defendant. He claims the phone was stolen and stopped working altogether. He’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues he bought the phone from someone else, so it’s not his responsibility to pay the plaintiff back.
Then, the plaintiff and defendant live in the same apartment complex. She says the defendant’s dog attacked her dog, and now he refuses to pay. She’s suing for vet bills and lost work. The defendant argues the plaintiff’s dog attacked his dog, and he doesn’t owe.
Plus, the defendant bought an ATV from the defendant. He claims the ATV had a cracked engine, so he’s suing for a refund. The defendant argues the plaintiff test drove the ATV and knew it had issues, so he doesn’t owe anything.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff brings her daughter to court. She says she loaned her daughter money after receiving a lump sum of money, but when she confronted her daughter about it, her daughter shoved her. The plaintiff claims her TV broke when the defendant pushed her, so she’s suing for the balance on a loan and damages to the TV and laptop. The defendant argues her mom started the fight, and she doesn’t think she owes anything because the money was a gift.
The plaintiff was at the defendant’s home when the defendant backed into her car. She says her bumper got destroyed, but now the defendant won’t pay, so she’s suing for car damages. The defendant argues he never hit the car because she didn’t even see it happen. He claims she hit a snowbank, so he doesn’t think he needs to pay.
The plaintiff paid the defendant a month of rent but then learned the building had bed bugs and the electricity wasn’t working. She says she wants her money back because when she moved in, the electricity didn’t work, and the defendant refused to fix it. The defendant argues the plaintiff popped the circuit breaker, and he doesn’t give full refunds.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff and his dad went to the defendant’s house to visit her, but when they got there, the defendant’s dog started barking at him. The plaintiff argues the dog jumped and bit him in the face, which caused him to get eight stitches. He’s suing for medical bills and pain and suffering. The defendant argues the plaintiff ignored a “beware of dog” sign and leaned down to pet the dog. She doesn’t think she owes the plaintiff anything.
The plaintiff bought some beds from the defendant’s store for herself and her daughter. She claims the beds that were delivered weren’t the ones she ordered, and the delivery guys refused to take the wrong beds back. She’s suing for a refund. The defendant admits the beds delivered weren’t the correct ones and he is sorry for that. He claims he told the plaintiff she could wait for the beds to arrive or get different ones, but the plaintiff just kept demanding a refund.
The plaintiff bought a car from the defendant. She says the car overheated after five days, and the defendant gave her another car. Two weeks after she got that car, the brakes failed, and she caused a five-car accident. She’s suing for her money back. The defendant doesn’t believe the brakes on the car failed.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff rented a home from the defendant. She says the home caught on fire and ruined all her belongings, but it started from an electrical fire. She claims the landlord won’t pay her back for her property that was destroyed, so she’s suing for the cost of belongings, pain and suffering, and the remainder of her security deposit. The defendant argues the fire was not electrical. He says the plaintiff stopped paying rent while he was in the process of evicting her
The plaintiffs are a father and daughter. She says she parked in front of the defendant’s home, but there were spikes sticking out of the curb and her tire popped. She and her father claim it is up to the defendant to pay for the damage because it’s the homeowner’s responsibility. They are suing for the cost of a tire. The defendant argues the plaintiff crashed into the curb, so he doesn’t owe anything.
The plaintiff says he and his girlfriend bought bedroom furniture from the defendant’s company. He claims the day before the delivery, the defendant said he wouldn’t deliver half of the furniture unless he wanted to pay extra. He’s suing for breach of contract. The defendant argues the defendant changed his mind at the last minute about wanting the furniture. He claims he didn’t do anything wrong.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff says he dated the defendant for years, and he sold her a computer. He says they broke up because she’s a pathological liar, so he’s suing her for what she owes. The defendant says she met the plaintiff, a hairdresser, when he did her hair, but he’s crazy and has sued her multiple times. She claims the computer was in lieu of plane tickets she bought to travel to England.
The plaintiff says he’s a DJ who sold 25 tickets to an event the defendant was throwing, but the defendant is stiffing him on his cut, so he’s suing. The defendant says he didn’t hire the defendant and doesn’t work for the club, the plaintiff is suing the wrong party
The plaintiff says he rented a property from the defendant, but the man kept his security deposit to use for landscaping. He maintained the yard, so he’s suing for his deposit. The defendant says the plaintiff neglected the yard and the bushes were overgrown, so he deducted the cost from the security deposit.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff says she was walking her dog when the defendant’s dog mauled hers. She says her dog was badly bitten and injured. She’s suing for vet bills and pain and suffering. The defendant argues the plaintiff’s dog was the aggressor because his dog was on his property and his dog was just defending himself. He’s countersuing for dog medication and harassment.
Then, the plaintiff used to be close friends with the defendant. He says he sold a car to the defendant, but now he’s refusing to pay. He’s suing for the balance due on a car and a speeding ticket. The defendant argues he made the payments. He also says he let the plaintiff stay on his couch for three months while he went through a rough patch with his wife. He doesn’t think he owes the plaintiff.
Plus, the plaintiff says she stored her washer and dryer at the defendant’s home. She argues the defendant gave away the appliances, so she’s suing for the amount the defendant owes her for the washer and dryer. The defendant says she got rid of them because she moved and the plaintiff never came to pick up the washer and dryer.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The plaintiff and defendant used to be very close friends. She says the defendant asked her to buy a phone and put it on her account, but the plaintiff said she would do it only if he paid the bills. She even reported it stolen because he wouldn’t pay, and now she’s suing. The defendant is countersuing for pain and suffering and defamation of character.
The plaintiff and defendant used to be close friends. The plaintiff says he loaned the defendant his car, and when he brought it back, the vehicle was damaged. He claims the defendant broke the heater and the gear shift, and now the car won’t stop. He’s suing for damages. The defendant argues the plaintiff told him beforehand that the car had issues.
The plaintiff says she has known the defendant for a very long time. The defendant says a cat gave birth to kittens in her backyard, so she gave them to the plaintiff to take care of. The plaintiff argues she took care of all the cats, so she’s suing for vet bills. The defendant says she helped pay for cat food for a year.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
The defendant brings his mom to court. He says his mom illegally signed his name to a lease on an apartment they were all living in, but she paid rent late. He’s suing for unpaid rent, a bedroom set, and cleaning fees. The defendant argues her son knew about the lease.
The plaintiff was in a band with the defendant. He says he and his band played a gig at a bar, but the defendant hasn’t paid the plaintiff his share of the money. He’s suing for what he’s owed. The defendant argues the plaintiff quit the band and made them cancel a show. He’s countersuing for the money lost on the canceled gig.
The plaintiff brought her new truck to the defendant’s car wash. She says her truck came out of the wash with a big scratch on the side. She’s suing for damages. The defendant argues the company washed over 400 cars that day and no other car had that issue. She also says she only uses soft materials, so it would be impossible to get the type of scratch seen on the car.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff worked for the defendant’s company as an exotic dancer. She says she invested in the defendant’s new sex toy business, but she hasn’t received any of her investment back, so she’s suing for her money. The defendant argues the plaintiff knew the return on investment would take more than a year, so she doesn’t owe the plaintiff anything.
Then, the plaintiff bought a car from her co-worker. She says the car worked fine the first time she drove it, but then it started breaking down. The plaintiff argues the car can’t be driven safely, so she’s suing for her money back. The defendant says he never saw any issues with the car, so he doesn’t owe her anything. He’s countersuing for lost wages.
Plus, the plaintiff hired the defendant to install silencers on two of his rifles. He claims the defendant took too long get the parts assembled, so he’s suing for the balance on his deposit. The defendant argues he let the plaintiff know it could take a year to clear a background check to get the silencers.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff is suing the defendant, her ex-boyfriend and the father of her daughter, because she claims he owes her money for an eviction fee and apartment bills. The defendant says he broke up with the plaintiff because he wanted a better life, and he believes the plaintiff is just suing him out of spite.
Then, the plaintiff hired and paid the defendant, a plumber, to do some work in his home. Unfortunately, the plaintiff claims the defendant sent his inexperienced assistant to do the job, and everything was ruined, so he’s suing for a refund. The defendant insists the plaintiff is lying, and he denies owing him anything. The defendant is countersuing for the balance due on the bill and slander.
Plus, the plaintiff says the defendant, the owner of a dry-cleaning business, ruined his leather varsity jacket, so he’s suing. The defendant claims she followed the instructions on the fake leather jacket, and she believes the plaintiff is a scammer looking to make some money.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices -
First, the plaintiff was supposed to go to Puerto Rico with the defendants. Unfortunately, an argument ensued before the trip, so the plaintiff ended up staying somewhere else. Now, the plaintiff claims the defendants won’t return her money, so she’s suing. The defendants insist the plaintiff bailed on them a week before the trip even though the deposit was nonrefundable. They are countersuing for airline tickets and a vacation rental.
Then, the plaintiff rented space from the defendant for his exercise and dance studio, but he says he was forced out because the defendants demanded a 33% rent increase. The plaintiff is suing the defendants for the return of his security deposit. The defendants claim the plaintiff tried to secretly move out and sublease the place to someone else. They’re countersuing for back rent and additional repairs.
Plus, the plaintiffs claim the defendant’s pit bull killed one of their puppies, a Cavalier King Charles, so they’re suing for value of the dead canine. The defendant says she was in a fenced-in yard, and the plaintiffs allowed their dog to enter.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices - Mostrar mais
