Episodi
-
DDDD Army - Thank You for 200K
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The video reflects on the 2003 Iraq War, calling it one of the greatest disasters in recent U.S. foreign policy. It emphasizes that the war was initiated under false pretenses â namely, the Bush administration's claim that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, which later turned out to be untrue. The war led to the fall of Saddam Hussein but came at enormous human and financial costs: thousands of American troops killed, tens of thousands wounded, trillions of dollars spent, and massive suffering for the Iraqi population.
The discussion then draws a comparison to the current situation with Iran, suggesting troubling similarities. Despite intelligence assessments â including those by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard â indicating that Iran does not currently have a nuclear weapons program or an order from the Ayatollah to begin one, Trump has repeatedly claimed otherwise. When questioned, he dismissed these intelligence assessments, saying theyâre wrong.
The commentary criticizes Trumpâs erratic and self-focused approach, noting his repeated shifts between threatening military action and pursuing diplomacy. It also questions the motivation behind potential U.S. involvement in a war with Iran, suggesting that just like in 2003, the true aim may be regime change rather than preventing nuclear proliferation.
Ultimately, the piece warns that if U.S. leadership ignores current intelligence â as it did in 2003 â it risks repeating the same catastrophic mistakes, this time in Iran.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Episodi mancanti?
-
In the early morning, 23 Iranian missiles struck various Israeli targets, continuing a pattern of escalating missile exchanges between the two countries. Both Iran and Israel are hitting each otherâs infrastructure, including nuclear sites, IRGC facilities, and energy and scientific institutions.
Despite Western media framing Israel as the dominant power, the analysis suggests that Iran is more resilient than portrayed. Iran can endure heavy strikes, while Israel must achieve specific military goals to claim victory. The conflict is likened to two heavyweights exchanging body blows, with both sides suffering significant damage.
A key point discussed is that air power alone may no longer be sufficient for a decisive outcome. Even U.S. involvement may not guarantee success, due to the sheer volume of Iranâs enriched nuclear materialâeven a 90% destruction rate could still leave Iran with enough for a nuclear weapon.
This may explain Donald Trumpâs sudden shift from threatening unconditional surrender to signaling openness to diplomacy. Itâs unclear whether this is a genuine change in strategy or just a pause to build more military force.
Meanwhile, Israeli damage is more severe than publicly acknowledged, with suppression of images and reports inside Israel. Recent Iranian strikes have:
Damaged a major Israeli science institute (June 16 & 20),
Hit a key research facility,
And crippled Israelâs fuel refining capability, creating a serious fuel deficit that could impact both civilian life and military operations.
The speaker warns that Israel is in a more vulnerable position than widely believed, and the narrative of Iranian weakness may be dangerously misleading.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The segment discusses former President Donald Trumpâs fluctuating public deadlines and statements regarding potential U.S. military action against Iran. He has repeatedly shifted timelinesâfrom claiming heâd end conflicts within 24 hours, to vague new two-week âdecisionsââcreating widespread uncertainty. Analyst Patrick Henningsen argues this delay may be strategic rather than genuine, possibly tied to logistical military preparations and Israelâs need to restock air defense systems like Iron Dome, with U.S. assistance.
Veteran journalist Seymour Hersh reportedly claims an operation is imminent, possibly as soon as the coming weekend. There are indicatorsâsuch as repositioning of U.S. personnel and equipmentâthat suggest preparations are underway. Henningsen warns not to trust Trumpâs public statements, recalling previous instances where negotiations served as a smokescreen for attacks.
Israeli PM Netanyahu has openly acknowledged deep U.S. involvement in defense efforts, with U.S. pilots, ships, and missile systems already active in Israel. This suggests the U.S. is already co-belligerent, even if not formally declaring war.
Media narratives claim Iran is exhausted and weak, but Henningsen rebuts this, pointing to how even Yemen managed to resist a U.S.-led air campaign. If Yemen posed challenges, Iranâvastly more powerfulâwould be a far greater problem. He expresses skepticism about Western mediaâs pro-Israel slant and warns that Iran likely has tens of thousands, potentially over 100,000 missiles, making a long conflict likely and costly.
In conclusion, the situation is volatile, Trumpâs unpredictability is dangerous, and U.S.-Israel coordination suggests escalation may be closer than the public is being told.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
In a recent discussion, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu stated that the U.S. is already heavily involved in aiding Israel during its conflict with Iranâthough not offensively, yet. The U.S. is contributing through missile defense systems (like Patriot and Aegis), ships offshore, and even pilots assisting in intercepting Iranian drones and missiles.
Commodore Steve Jeremy, a UK Royal Navy veteran, explained that this support is significant but still defensive. He warned that if the U.S. were to shift to offensive operations, Iran would likely retaliate directly against American forces, escalating the conflict dramatically.
Key takeaways:
U.S. Support: Currently focused on defensive rolesâair defenses, ammunition, intelligence, and interceptorsâbut not conducting offensive strikes.
Potential Escalation: If the U.S. crosses into offensive action, Iran may consider all bets off and retaliate broadly.
Israelâs Vulnerability: Despite having advanced systems like Iron Dome, Davidâs Sling, and U.S. support, Israeli defenses are porousâmissiles still get through.
Iranâs Strategy: Likely using older, less effective missiles to exhaust Israeli and U.S. interceptor stockpiles before deploying more advanced weapons.
Defense Fatigue: The Westâs air defense systems, including ship-based Aegis, are limited by the number of interceptors. Sustained barrages could overwhelm them quickly.
Resource War: The confrontation may come down to which side runs out of missile supply firstâIsrael's interceptors or Iran's offensive weapons.
The situation is precarious, and though the U.S. hasnât fully entered offensively, its deepening involvement brings the region closer to broader war.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The video underscores that while the Iran-Israel conflict is currently dominating headlines, it's only part of a larger web of global tensionsâincluding the Russia-Ukraine war and rising U.S.-China competition in the Indo-Pacific. The speaker emphasizes that all of these geopolitical theaters are interconnected, and U.S. actions in one will inevitably impact others.
Key Developments and Arguments:
đč Trumpâs Delay on Iran Strike
Breaking news from the White House: Trump will wait two more weeks before deciding whether to launch strikes on Iran, citing the "substantial chance of negotiations."
Skepticism remains about whether this delay is genuine diplomacy or strategic misdirection.
đč Missed Opportunities for Peace
Trump had a viable diplomatic pathway earlier in the year with Iran through negotiator Steve Witkoff, and Iran was reportedly open to limiting uranium enrichment (under 3.67%).
That potential deal was underminedâlikely by Netanyahu and Israeli hardlinersâwho opposed any deal short of full Iranian regime change.
đč Israelâs Real Objective
According to the speaker, Israel does not want negotiationsâonly the complete dismantling of the Iranian regime. This explains their opposition to the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) and their influence over U.S. policy shifts.
đč Legal and Ethical Concerns
Under international law (specifically the NPT, or Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty), Iran has the right to peaceful nuclear development. Israel is not a signatory; Iran and the U.S. are.
The U.S. pushing for a zero enrichment policy is a legal overreach and, if enforced by war, would violate both international and constitutional norms.
đč Strategic Contradictions
The speaker warns that the U.S. cannot claim to uphold a ârules-based orderâ while violating it when convenient.
He criticizes past U.S. military interventions (Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya) as disasters, arguing that repeating these patterns in Iran would be reckless and based on failed logic.
đč Foreign Influence & Escalation Risks
Netanyahu reportedly talks to Trump âalmost daily,â strongly influencing U.S. policy.
Meanwhile, Russia and China are actively supporting Iran (e.g., Russia increasing personnel at Iranian nuclear facilities, and China delivering military aid).
These alignments raise the stakes for global war, not just a regional one.
Final Takeaway:
Despite Trumpâs public pause for negotiations, the speaker suggests that real diplomacy was already sabotaged. The current pathâfueled by Israeli pressure and U.S. maximalismârisks a war that lacks legal justification, global support, or strategic wisdom. Instead, it threatens to repeat a history of costly, destabilizing U.S. military ventures.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Donald Trump made vague and contradictory statements about potential U.S. military action against Iran, suggesting Iran is already defeated and calling for its "unconditional surrender." He downplayed Iranâs defenses, claiming U.S. and Israeli forces have total air dominance. In response, Iranâs Supreme Leader firmly rejected any imposed peace or surrender, warning of serious consequences if the U.S. intervenes.
Col. Douglas Macgregor, a former Trump advisor, harshly criticized Trumpâs view as delusional and uninformed, driven by misleading advice from the same establishment figures who misjudged the war in Ukraine. Macgregor argued that Iran is gaining strength while Israel is growing weaker under heavy missile fire. He warned that assuming Iran will collapse is dangerously naĂŻve, and that U.S. involvement could backfire severely.
Macgregor accused the U.S. "three-branch system"âCongress, the military-industrial complex, and mainstream mediaâof spreading the same false optimism they used with Ukraine. He noted voices like Lindsey Graham and Jack Keane are pushing for limited airstrikes to neutralize Iranâs nuclear program, but Macgregor warned that the conflict is already a full-scale war. Iran, he said, now sees destroying Israel as essential to its own survival and will retaliate forcefully if the U.S. joins the fight.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Donald Trump has issued a series of inflammatory posts on Truth Social indicating the U.S. now has âcomplete controlâ of the skies over Iran and suggesting he knows the location of Iranâs Supreme Leader, calling him an âeasy targetâ but stating they wonât strike âfor now.â He also demanded âunconditional surrenderâ from Iran, implying potential U.S. military action if provocations continue. This follows a national security meeting after his abrupt return from the G7 summit.
Analyst Larry Johnson, a former CIA official, reacted with alarm, saying Trump appears poised to launch a war against Iran without congressional approval, a decision he calls reckless and politically disastrous. Johnson warns this could split Trumpâs base and likens it to the Iraq Warâcalling it another conflict based on misinformation. Prominent Trump allies like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Charlie Kirk have voiced strong opposition, fearing it will destroy Trump's presidency and damage the U.S. long-term.
Tucker Carlson specifically warned it could mark the "end of the American empire" and expressed disappointment that Trump resorted to personal attacks rather than addressing criticism. Johnson echoed this frustration, calling Trump âthin-skinnedâ and ânarcissistic,â and stated he now regrets voting for him. He emphasized that Iran, unlike Israel, complies with international nuclear inspection protocols, and suggested that Trumpâs rhetoric is dangerously close to fabricating a new war under false pretenses.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
The speaker sharply criticizes Israeli and U.S. military claims and strategies, particularly those surrounding the current conflict with Iran and broader regional tensions. Key points include:
Israeli Air Superiority Claims Are Disputed: The speaker calls Netanyahuâs claims of air supremacy over Iranian skies "mythology" and "coping," arguing Israel has failed to suppress Iranian air defenses. He asserts any successful operations were carried out by Mossad or special forcesânot the air force.
Israel Lacks True Military Power: The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) are described as a small, rigid force lacking the capacity for modern combined-arms warfare. Their past record (e.g., 2006 Lebanon war) is used to argue their inadequacy in facing a modern, well-armed opponent like Iran.
Negotiation Rejection is Ideological: Despite Israelâs vulnerable position, Netanyahu refuses negotiations, citing failed talks with Iran and internal pressure from religious and political fanatics. His political survival is allegedly tied to continuing conflict.
U.S. Involvement is Risky and Growing: The speaker warns that the U.S. is already indirectly involved (e.g., refueling Israeli jets) and risks being dragged into a larger war. He criticizes U.S. officials like Blinken and Sullivan as dangerously incompetent and disconnected from military reality.
Lindsey Graham's War Advocacy is Condemned: Grahamâs call for total destruction of Iranâs nuclear program is described as reckless, criminal, and ignorant. The speaker accuses him of being a warmonger serving lobby interests, not the American people.
Hope in Some Dissenters: The speaker finds a glimmer of hope in figures like Rand Paul and Thomas Massie, who warn against escalation and oppose deeper U.S. involvement.
Core Message: Both Israeli and U.S. leaders are dangerously miscalculating their military capabilities, underestimating Iran, and risking catastrophic escalationâpossibly even nuclear warâbased on ideology, delusion, or political self-preservation rather than strategic logic.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker paints a bleak picture of life in Ukraine during the ongoing war, claiming that:
Ordinary citizens are suffering: Many are struggling financially, only able to pay for basic communal services. Mothers are trying to smuggle their teenage sons (14â16 years old) out of the country to avoid conscription, fearing for their lives.
Conscription is aggressive: Men over 22 are reportedly afraid to leave their homes due to forced recruitment. There are instances of people being beaten by conscription officers, and women are sometimes seen physically defending their male relatives from being taken.
The public desires peace: The speaker argues that most Ukrainians do not support continued fighting and that the narrative that they want no compromise is false. They are tired of the war and want it to end.
Zelenskyâs support is overstated and enforced: Only those benefiting from the war, like state-sponsored journalists and corrupt figures, truly back President Zelensky. Honest political opposition is allegedly crushed, with critics imprisoned and afraid to speak publiclyâeven for things as simple as social media likes.
Corruption and inequality: Allegedly, $15 billion has been paid in bribes to allow men to flee the country despite the exit ban. Zelenskyâs inner circle is accused of enriching themselves during the war.
Suppression of dissent: The speaker describes Ukraine as a dictatorship where polls cannot be trusted, political prisoners are held without due process, and Russian speakers face persecution.
Loss of faith in leadership and the West: Many citizens reportedly feel abandoned by both their own government and Western allies. Promises to hold or protect cities often went unfulfilled.
Religious freedom curtailed: The Russian Orthodox Church has been banned, creating further discontent, as many Ukrainians were adherents.
Zelenskyâs peace rhetoric is seen as hollow: Though he talks about peace, the speaker claims his actions contradict his words, blaming everyone else while continuing a war most Ukrainians no longer want.
This account reflects a deeply critical and possibly pro-Russian viewpoint, portraying Ukraine's leadership as corrupt, dictatorial, and out of touch with the publicâs desire for peace.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
BREAKING: ISRAEL Strikes IRAN Israel has launched Operation Rising Lion, a broad and targeted military campaign aimed at dismantling Iranâs nuclear threat and eliminating high-ranking IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) personnel. The operation includes missile strikes, air defense suppression, and assassinations of Iranian leaders and scientists allegedly involved in a clandestine nuclear weapons program.
Key claims from Israeli officials include:
Iran is allegedly 15 days to a few months away from developing a nuclear bomb.
Iran has enough enriched uranium for up to nine atomic weapons.
Israel struck with force due to this âimminentâ threat.
Major developments and assertions:
Heavy damage reported in Tehran, including the collapse of an entire apartment building where IRGC officials were believed to be located.
Israel is reportedly targeting not just military infrastructure but also civilian areas used by military and scientific personnel.
There has been no confirmation or public evidence of the intelligence behind the urgency, leading to skepticism about the credibility of the claims.
US Response and Political Fallout:
The United States was not involved, reportedly warned Iran in advance not to target US forces.
The White House and Trump administration (including Trump himself) have distanced themselves, with Trump allegedly rejecting Israeli efforts to gain US participation.
Concerns are raised that Israel may be trying to provoke a strong Iranian retaliation to pull the US into the war.
Commentatorâs Warnings:
The speaker strongly urges that the US must stay out of the conflict, regardless of any future Iranian retaliation.
Emphasizes that Israel must face the consequences alone if it acts unilaterally.
Warns against American politicians and pundits (e.g., Lindsey Graham, Mark Levin) who may try to push the US into war on Israelâs behalf.
Notes inconsistencies in Israeli leadershipâs claims about the immediacy of the nuclear threat (some say 15 days, others say months or a year), suggesting possible fabrication or exaggeration.
Bottom Line:
This was a preemptive and aggressive Israeli military strike based on the belief Iran is close to nuclear weapon capability. While some support the move as necessary, others see it as a deliberate provocation that risks wider war â with strong arguments made that the US must not be drawn in.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
In the current phase of the Ukraine-Russia war, infantry operations are extremely grueling and deadlyâespecially for Ukrainian forces. Ukrainian troops often hike long distances to reach frontline positions, choosing dawn, dusk, or bad weather to reduce exposure, but even then the journey and logistics like casualty evacuation are highly dangerous.
On the Russian side, they continue launching mass assaults using "expendable" infantry, often on motorbikes, but suffer high losses. Ukrainian drone teams and artillery often eliminate entire Russian assault units before they reach the "zero line." However, if Russian forces do reach entrenched positions, it becomes hard for Ukraine to dislodge them due to thinly spread infantry.
Thereâs a tactical and technological arms race between both sides: Ukraine often innovates, but Russia quickly copies and scales new tactics. One example is fiber-optic drones, where Russia had the early advantage.
Regarding artillery, its primacy has declined, replaced in large part by drone warfare, especially FPV (First-Person View) strike drones. Artillery still plays a roleâespecially in difficult terrainâbut drones now cause the majority of frontline wounds. For example, recent field hospitals report that 90% of injuries come from drones rather than artillery, a reversal from even a year ago.
Manpower is Ukraineâs biggest strategic weakness. Russia has a much larger population and a seemingly endless supply of infantry. Ukraine, however, struggles to replenish combat-effective troops, especially infantry. Ukrainian infantry now spend weeks in exposed frontline positions because even the trip back is too dangerous. These conditions are more miserable than World War I trench warfare, with even bathroom breaks proving deadly due to drone surveillance.
Meanwhile, Russian forces, though still taking heavy casualties, have more numerical flexibility and increasingly use sacrificial assault tactics. Ukrainian infantry, in contrast, are often stuck holding increasingly thin lines, with no realistic rotation or relief. The saturation of drones and the infantry imbalance together define the brutal current state of the war.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker critiques Western narratives, particularly those from figures like Senator Lindsey Graham, about Russiaâs intentions in Ukraine and the broader post-Soviet space. Key points include:
Media and Narrative Critique
The channel claims to present full context and direct quotes from global actors rather than using misleading soundbites.
Criticizes mainstream figures for claiming, without evidence, that Putin seeks to "reconquer the Soviet Union."
Asserts Putin has consistently stated his key goal is security on Russia's western flank, not empire restoration.
Putinâs Stated Goals
Security concerns: Opposition to NATO presence near Russian borders.
Consistent demands: Since 2015, Putin emphasized implementing the Minsk Accords to protect ethnic Russians in Ukraine.
2015 to 2024 evolution: Russiaâs demands have increasedâfrom just Crimea to now potentially 5â8 Ukrainian regionsâas Western responses remained defiant or dismissive.
Claims Russia offered multiple diplomatic solutions (e.g., Dec 2021 proposal) that were ignored or rejected.
Russia's Military Buildup
Significant increase in Russiaâs production of tanks, APCs, artillery, drones, and munitions.
New bases being constructed on the western (NATO-facing) flank.
Western actions (e.g., arming Ukraine) are presented as justification for this buildup.
Western Weakness and Strategic Failure
Accuses NATO and the U.S. of depleting their own stockpiles by arming Ukraine.
Claims Russia is now militarily stronger than at the warâs onset in Feb 2022, despite its own losses.
Suggests Western policy has inadvertently strengthened Russia and weakened NATO industrial and defense capacities.
Frontline Military Update
Russian forces are actively advancing in multiple sectors across eastern and southern Ukraine.
Gray zones indicate recent Russian advances; some Ukrainian forces risk encirclement.
Russia appears to bypass strongholds rather than directly assault them, aiming to isolate and envelop Ukrainian positions.
Russia has nearly repelled recent Ukrainian incursions into Russian territory and is continuing to push southward in Sumy and other fronts.
Ukrainian defensive lines are reportedly being broken, with Russian forces nearing operational depth near cities and forest belts.
Conclusion
The speaker argues the West is mischaracterizing Russiaâs aims and failing to adapt to changing realities.
Warns against continued escalation and arms transfers to Ukraine without a coherent strategy or industrial replenishment.
Suggests future commentary will address calls for Ukrainian NATO membershipâstill being made despite escalating risks.
See Tulsi Gabbard's video:
I recently visited Hiroshima, and stood at the epicenter of a city scarred by the unimaginable horror caused by a single nuclear bomb dropped in 1945. What I saw, the stories I heard, and the haunting sadness that remains, will stay with me forever.
https://x.com/TulsiGabbard/status/193...Transcript
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The speaker argues that the United States is suffering the consequences of arrogance and delusional thinking in its approach to the Russia-Ukraine war. They criticize both Republican and Democratic leadersâparticularly Congressman Steny Hoyerâfor advocating continued U.S. support under the guise of âdemocracyâ and âfreedom,â accusing them of pushing a reckless agenda that ignores the actual balance of power and risks nuclear conflict.
The speaker emphasizes that:
The U.S. underestimated Russiaâs resilience and overestimated the effectiveness of Western aid.
Russia has weathered Western weapons shipments and is now advancing steadily.
Calls for more action (e.g., boots on the ground) are not only foolish but could lead to nuclear war, which is considered inevitable if NATO troops directly engage Russian forces.
Instead of questioning American âstomachâ or resolve, leaders should ask if they have the wisdom to avoid a war that can't be won.
They advocate:
Immediate withdrawal of U.S. support.
Letting Ukraine and Europe come to terms with their limited capacity without America.
Accepting geopolitical reality rather than pursuing fantasy goals.
The speaker concludes by urging Donald Trump to end U.S. involvement immediately for Americaâs safety and national interest, warning that otherwise the U.S. faces either defeat or nuclear escalation.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
In a recent appearance on the New York Post's new podcast Pod Force One, President Donald Trump expressed declining confidence in reaching a diplomatic deal with Iran. He suggested that delays and changes in circumstances over the past two months have made him pessimistic, hinting that if diplomacy fails, military action could be a last resort.
The commentator warns that such action would be unconstitutional without Congressional approval, citing the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Act of 1973, which limit the presidentâs authority to launch military attacks unless the U.S. is directly attacked or Congress authorizes it.
The discussion criticizes the idea of attacking Iran, emphasizing that:
Iran does not currently have nuclear weapons and claims not to be pursuing them.
The Director of National Intelligence (DNI) confirmed no evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program.
While Iran has increased uranium enrichment to 60%, this is still below weapons-grade (90%).
Any attack would not only be unlawful but also unnecessary and counterproductive.
The speaker also underscores that Iran is not an imminent threat to the U.S., arguing its actions are driven by regime survival, not aggression. The real pressure, they claim, is coming from Israel, which sees Iran as a threat and has taken repeated aggressive actions against it. However, the U.S. should not be drawn into conflict on Israelâs behalf.
Trump's earlier rhetoric in March and April 2025 indicated he was nearing a decisionâpossibly peace or war. His envoy, Steve Witkoff, had optimistic meetings with Iranian representatives, and talks focused on limiting uranium enrichment. However, recent developments appear to have stalled progress, reviving Trump's hawkish tone.
In conclusion, the commentary urges restraint, constitutional adherence, and avoiding unnecessary conflict, noting that Iran lacks the military-industrial capacity to sustain a war and does not want one.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
discussion centers on a provocative article claiming Russia has effectively won the war in Ukraine and NATO can't stop it, with former U.S. military advisor Col. Douglas Macgregor largely agreeing.
Key points:
Russia's Slow Advance Was Intentional: Macgregor argues that Putin has deliberately avoided full-scale aggression to prevent escalating into direct conflict with NATO or the U.S. He believes Putin still wants post-war diplomatic and economic relations with the West.
NATOâs Power Overstated: The guest and the article assert that NATO would lose in a direct war with Russia, despite NATOâs public statements to the contrary.
Shift in Russian Strategy: Following Ukrainian attacks on Russian military and civilian infrastructure, Russia has intensified airstrikes. There's speculation Putin may officially escalate the conflict from a âSpecial Military Operationâ (SMO) to a âCounterterrorist Operationâ (CTO), which under Russian law could justify targeting Ukrainian leadership.
Zelensky Seen as a Barrier to Peace: Macgregor characterizes President Zelensky as irrational, detached from reality, and uninterested in peaceâaccusing him of prolonging the war for personal gain.
Western Media Criticized: U.S. media, especially ABC News, is accused of failing to challenge Zelenskyâs claims and promoting a pro-war narrative.
Call for Russian Decisiveness: Macgregor suggests the war will only end when Russian forces take Kyiv and remove Zelenskyâs government. He believes the U.S. and Europe are not in a position to respond militarily, so Putin should act decisively now.
Overall Message: According to Macgregor and the article's author, Russia has strategically outmaneuvered Ukraine and NATO, and unless there's a dramatic changeâlike Russian troops taking Kyivâthe war will drag on needlessly.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
The conversation critiques Western misunderstandings of modern military operations and operational planning, especially in the context of the Russia-Ukraine war. Key points include:
Combat Effectiveness Misunderstood: Western commentators, particularly those without military experience, misinterpret military retreats (like Ukraineâs) as tactical when in reality they signify losing ground to a better-equipped adversary.
Modern Warfare Misconceptions: The idea that drones dominate modern war is rejected. Traditional heavy artillery, such as battalions of self-propelled guns, still inflict far greater destruction. Drone strikes are limited in scope compared to massed artillery fire.
Operational Planning Requires Integration: There is no "wonder weapon." Victory comes from the coordinated use of multiple military systemsâdrones, artillery, electronic warfare, logisticsânot from isolated technologies.
Media and Political Narrative Failures: Many in Western media and politics push a narrative disconnected from battlefield realities, often to serve political aims (e.g., propping up a side despite military disadvantages).
Russian Strategy and Restraint: Russia is portrayed as operationally and strategically advanced, evolving since 2022. Despite provocations (e.g., British involvement in Ukrainian strikes), Russia exercises restraint to maintain legitimacy with the Global South and avoid escalation.
Zelensky and Western Leadership Misread Putin: Zelensky claims Putin doesnât want peace, but critics argue Putin is simply not willing to stop while holding a military advantage. Stopping now would forfeit that edge.
Broader Implications: The discussion warns that if roles were reversedâsay Russia supporting an enemy during a U.S. warâthe U.S. would not show the same restraint. Yet Russia, being âjudicialâ and strategic, avoids overt retaliation to maintain global diplomatic leverage.
In essence, the segment argues that real-world military planning and effectiveness are being poorly understood in the West, with consequences for both battlefield success and geopolitical narratives.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
-
President Trump, responding to violent protests in Los Angeles following a controversial ICE raid on June 6, stated he may invoke the Insurrection Act, depending on the situation. The raidâparticularly at a downtown LA Home Depotâsparked outrage due to the heavily militarized appearance of ICE agents, resembling combat troops, which escalated public fear and unrest.
While Trump emphasized law and order, he acknowledged the need for careful enforcement that doesn't fuel further chaos. The protests highlight underlying social fractures and have intensified federal vs. state tensions, particularly between Washington and California.
On June 7, Trump issued an executive order deploying 2,000 National Guard troops under federal authority for up to 60 days, signaling a serious federal intervention. The situation reflects deep divides over immigration enforcement, public safety, and the appropriate use of federal power in local conflicts.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
- Mostra di più
