Episodi
-
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's Monadology proposes that the universe consists of simple, indivisible substances called monads, each possessing perception and appetition. These monads, differing in quality, are distinct from one another and represent the entire universe from their unique perspective. Leibniz argues for the existence of God as the necessary substance that grounds the existence and harmony of all monads, establishing a pre-established harmony between the physical and moral realms. This harmony ensures that the actions of monads, governed by final causes, align perfectly with the laws of efficient causes in the physical world. Ultimately, Leibniz's system envisions a divinely ordered universe where all things, both physical and moral, work together in a perfect and preordained system.
-
Leibniz argues for God's creation as the best possible world, defining God's attributes (omniscience, omnipotence) and explaining the relationship between God, individual substances (monads), and the universe. He distinguishes between efficient and final causes, highlighting the role of God's will and understanding in governing events. Finally, he addresses the nature of human free will within this predetermined yet harmonious system.
-
Episodi mancanti?
-
The first rationalist we will cover is Rene Descartes. Descartes details his methodical approach to doubting established beliefs, aiming to construct a firm foundation for truth. The excerpt covers his skepticism, his four maxims for reasoning, and his proofs for the existence of God and the human soul. Further, it summarizes his physics, focusing on the motion of the heart and the distinction between humans and animals. Finally, it discusses the reasons behind his decision to publish his work, expressing both confidence in his methods and reluctance to engage in fruitless controversies.
-
The Meditations introduces Descartes's innovative method of achieving certain knowledge by systematically doubting all previously held beliefs, ultimately establishing the Cogito ("I think, therefore I am") as a foundational truth.
-
The second of the "British Empiricists" that will be covered is George Berkeley. George Berkeley's A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge argues against the existence of matter, asserting that all things exist only in the mind of God. He refutes the concept of abstract ideas, showing how they are based on language rather than genuine mental constructs. Berkeley contends that sensations are not copies of external objects but are directly perceived and, therefore, reality is fundamentally perceptual.
-
The third of the "British Empiricists" is John Locke, also known for his political philosophy and his Treatises on Government (check out our episode on the second treatise). Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding, presented here in excerpts, explores the origins and nature of human knowledge. Locke argues against the existence of innate ideas, proposing instead that all knowledge stems from sensory experience (sensation) and reflection on mental processes. He details various types of ideas, including simple and complex ideas, modes, substances, and relations, analyzing their formation and potential for error. The text also discusses the nature of personal identity, free will, and morality, ultimately aiming to establish a framework for understanding the limits and capabilities of human understanding.
-
Kick off the new season Rationalism vs. Empiricism with the empiricist David Hume. A Treatise of Human Nature explores the nature of human understanding and the passions. Sections cover topics like inference, belief, probability, causality, and the will. The text further investigates the nature of identity, reason in animals, and the origins of morality, ultimately proposing a system based on experience, custom, and the imagination.
-
Hume's Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding is much shorter than the Treatise but is known to be more precise and clear. Hume argues for an empiricist and instrumentalist approach to knowledge. He emphasized the role of experience and custom over reason in forming beliefs, notably concerning causation and miracles.
-
Plato's Meno primarily explores the question of whether virtue can be taught. Socrates and Meno engage in a discussion that examines various definitions of virtue, ultimately concluding that it is neither innate nor learned but rather a divinely bestowed gift. The text also introduces Plato's theory of reminiscence, suggesting that learning is a process of recollecting pre-existing knowledge from a past life. Finally, a substantial section analyzes Plato's theory of Forms, comparing it to the philosophical approaches of later thinkers.
-
Plato's Republic explores the nature of justice. Socrates, through dialogues with various interlocutors, investigates different definitions of justice, ultimately arguing that a just life is superior to an unjust one, both in terms of individual well-being and societal harmony. The discussion extends to ideal forms of government, education, and the soul's composition, utilizing metaphors like the allegory of the cave to illustrate philosophical concepts. Key themes include the importance of reason, the pursuit of knowledge, and the ideal state's structure, with significant attention paid to the role of philosophy and the limitations of art and poetry. The text also examines the cyclical nature of political systems and the corresponding characteristics of individuals within those systems.
-
Plato's Crito is a dialogue depicting a conversation between Socrates.and his friend Crito in prison, shortly before Socrates' execution. Critourges Socrates to escape, emphasizing the negative consequences for Crito and other friends if Socrates remains. Socrates, however, refuses, arguing that escaping would violate his moral principles and break a social contract with Athens. He believes it is always unjust to return evil for evil, and that even the threat of death does not justify compromising his commitment to justice. The dialogue explores themes of justice, civic duty, and the importance of upholding one's moral principles even in the face of adversity.
-
Plato's Apology is a transcription of Socrates' defense speech at his trial in Athens. Socrates recounts accusations leveled against him, including impiety and corrupting the youth. He defends himself by explaining his philosophical method of questioning those believed wise, revealing their lack of true knowledge. Ultimately, Socrates accepts his death sentence with calm dignity, asserting his commitment to philosophical inquiry and belief in divine guidance. The text explores themes of truth, justice, and the examined life.
-
Plato's Phaedo is a dialogue exploring the immortality of the soul. Socrates, awaiting execution, presents various arguments for the soul's pre-existence and continued existence after death, engaging his disciples in philosophical debate. These arguments draw upon Pythagorean and other philosophical traditions, including the theory of Forms and the concept of recollection. The dialogue also features vivid descriptions of the afterlife, presented through myths and allegories, and explores Socrates' own unwavering belief in the soul's divine nature. Finally, the text provides context regarding Socrates' final hours and his philosophical legacy.
-
This text is an excerpt from Plato's Timaeus, a dialogue focusing on cosmology and the creation of the universe. Socrates, Critias, and Timaeus discuss the ideal state, leading to Critias recounting a legend from Solon about Atlantis, a powerful island civilization destroyed by natural catastrophe. Timaeus then elaborates on Plato's theory of Forms, explaining the creation of the cosmos and its inhabitants, including humans, as a reflection of perfect, eternal ideals. The dialogue explores the relationship between the soul and body, and the causes of disease and imperfection, tying them to imbalances in the elements and the soul's journey. Finally, the text discusses the transmigration of souls based on their actions in life.
-
Plato's Symposium is a dialogue exploring the nature of love through speeches given by various characters at a banquet. The text provides an introduction analyzing the dialogue's structure and philosophical depth, followed by the full dialogue itself. Socrates' speech, recounted by Aristodemus, is central, presenting Diotima's teachings on love as a philosophical journey towards the eternal and absolute. Alcibiades'drunken arrival and praise of Socrates adds a comedic and personal dimension to the philosophical discussion of love.
-
Plato's Allegory of the Cave, uses the metaphor of prisoners chained in a cave, only seeing shadows projected on a wall, to illustrate the difference between perception and reality. The prisoners mistake shadows for reality until one escapes, experiencing the painful transition to the outside world and the illuminating power of the sun. This escape represents the journey of the soul toward knowledge and understanding, and the allegory explores the challenges of enlightenment and the potential hostility toward those who have attained it. The dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon reveals the difficulties of seeking truth and the importance of contemplating higher ideals. Finally, the allegory emphasizes that true knowledge is not instilled but rather discovered through the soul's inherent capacity for learning.
-
Book 12 of Aristotle's Metaphysics discusses his conception of the unmoved mover, an eternal and immaterial being. The unmoved mover is the ultimate source of all motion and change in the world. He argues that the unmoved mover is not affected by the world, but instead, is the final cause.
-
Aristotle's Metaphysics Book 13 discusses the philosophical problem of substance. Aristotle tackles the existence of mathematical objects, such as numbers and geometrical figures, and explores arguments for and against their existence as separate entities. He then critiques Plato's theory of Forms, examining the various arguments for their existence and the problems associated with them, including their nature as universals and separables.
-
Season Finale!! Aristotle critiques earlier philosophical attempts to explain the fundamental principles of reality using numbers. Aristotle argues against the idea that numbers, either as abstract entities or as "Forms," are the ultimate constituents of the universe. He challenges the methodologies and assumptions of thinkers like the Pythagoreans, highlighting inconsistencies and logical flaws in their arguments. His central point is that these numerical theories fail to adequately explain the diversity and change observable in the world, and that a more robust understanding of substance and potentiality is needed.
-
Aristotle examines multiple meanings of key terms, including "beginning," "cause," "element," and "nature," analyzing their various applications and relationships. He further defines concepts like "necessary," "one," "same," "other," "prior," "posterior," "potency," "quantum," "quality," "relative," "complete," "limit," "disposition," "having," "affection," "privation," "holding," "coming from," "part," "whole," "mutilated," "genus," and "accident,"clarifying their nuanced uses and interconnections. The work systematically dissects these terms, revealing the complexities of defining and understanding reality. Finally, Aristotle distinguishes between accidental and essential aspects of being.
- Mostra di più
