Episodi
-
The Spanish flu was a global pandemic that occurred in 1918-1919, caused by an H1N1 influenza virus. It spread quickly and infected about a third of the worldâs population, leading to millions of deaths. The virus was especially deadly because it affected healthy young adults, not just the elderly or sick.
Except, well, that isnât true.
The official story is bunk.
The flu was a man-made disaster. It was not the germs that killed, but the vaccines and suppressive drugs administered by the authorities.
âEleanor McBean, author of The Poisoned Needle
So, if the official story is bunk, what is the truth?
There was no virus
Michael Bryant, in his outstandingly researched article, Exploding the Spanish Flu Myth, notes that the Spanish flu wasnât caused by a virus, but by the harsh environmental conditions of World War I.
In other words, there was no evidence of a deadly pathogen spreading between people.
Jerm Warfare is no holds barred and you should support it
What happened, as Michael explains, was a collection of war-related consequences.
I mean, isnât it a total coincidence that WW1 and the Spanish flu ended around the same time?
Factors like chemical warfare, overcrowded and unsanitary living spaces, and mass vaccinations created the perfect storm for illness.
The primary vectors to âthe Spanish fluâ were:
* chemical warfare toxins affecting soldiers and civilians
* overcrowded and unhygienic wartime conditions
* experimental vaccines and medical treatments
The vaccinations given to American soldiers during the war sparked a wave of illness like weâve never seen before, one that conveniently distracted from the political and economic upheavals of the time.
âFrederick T Gates (Rockefeller Foundation)
It was always the war
Young, healthy men were the hardest hit, not because of a virus, but due to the brutal conditions they faced.
Why would healthy men ranging between age 20 and 40, mostly soldiers and war staff, be most affected?
Because it wasnât their immune systems failing them; it was the toxic stress of war.
People quickly forget the brutal introduction of trench warfare, chemical weapons, and modern tech like machine guns and tanks, leading to massive casualties and horrific conditions for soldiers and civilians.
Additionally and somewhat crucially, as Michael highlights, thereâs no pathogenic evidence in historical records suggesting that a virus caused the Spanish flu.
The Rosenau Experiment
The Rosenau Experiment, headed by Harvardâs Milton Rosenau and funded by the US Public Health Service, aimed to show that the Spanish flu was contagious.
It failed.
Not one of the 62 healthy volunteers became ill. More volunteers were used later, and they didnât get sick either.
Basically, they inhaled the breath of infected patients, had secretions from the noses and throats of the sick rubbed into their eyes, noses, and mouths, and even received blood injections from sick patients.
Nothing happened.
Nobody fell ill.
Rosenau concluded that he had no idea what was going on.
We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted⊠Perhaps⊠we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.
âMilton Rosenau, 1919
Some of the talking points of our conversation included:
* Understanding the Spanish flu and its misconceptions
* The role of World War I and its impact on health
* Chemical warfare and vaccination campaigns during the war
* The Rosenau experiment and disease transmission
* Demographics of Spanish flu victims and causes of death
* Bacterial infections, masks, and the cover-up of real causes
Is it unreasonable to suggest that the primary cause of deaths attributable to the Spanish Flu was everything related to WW1
âMichael Bryant
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.jermwarfare.social
Steven Young is an author, theoretical physicist, and musician.
In our conversation, he talks about how science has become a false religion and why alchemy is an important element of science that's been mostly forgotten.
đș Steven's bio, links, other info, and full video here.
-
Episodi mancanti?
-
Anthony Levatino is a former obstetrician-gynecologist (OBGYN) who performed over 1,200 abortions and now speaks out against it.
â ïž As an aside, I recommend listening to my conversation with Eden McCourt on the case against abortion.
Some folks argue that unborn babies are not babies, but this is both a stupid and convenient argument to make themselves feel better and to shift the responsibility onto others, so they feel less guilty about their sexual behaviour.
đș Watch the video of this podcast here.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
John Perkins, now an author, is a former âeconomic hitmanâ (EHM) who wrote about his dark career in his explosive memoir, Confessions of an Economic Hitman.
Basically, he would convince governments of developing countries to take on massive loans that would leave them shackled to US government and corporate interests. These debts gave Americans the power to control those countriesâ politics and economies from behind the scenes.
Johnâs work took him around the world, from Indonesia to Latin America.
In Indonesia, for example, he helped justify large loans by presenting skewed economic forecasts. These projects, which were supposed to lift countries out of poverty, often led to economic dependency and social unrest.
For clarity, the huge loans that John facilitated came primarily from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The projects would end up benefiting American companies, like engineering firms, but the host country would be left with crippling debt it could never repay. So, while infrastructural development did occur, it came at a stupidly high cost.
Debt slavery, in other words.
In his book, John describes how leaders who resisted American control often faced severe consequences. In Panama, for example, Manuel Noriega, who initially cooperated, became a target when he refused to play along. His downfall was engineered through economic and political pressure, and eventually, military intervention.
John also recounts the mysterious deaths of leaders like Ecuadorâs Jaime RoldĂłs, who stood against American bullying. Can you guess what happened to him? It just so happened that he died in a plane crash.
Total coincidence.
Globalisation isnât all good
â ïž I need to quickly distinguish between globalism and globalisation.
Globalism is an ideological, geopolitical, and economic attempt to centralise the world under one-world governance (Agenda 2030). Globalism is not your friend.
Globalisation, on the other hand, is the interconnectivity of the world through travel, business, the internet, and so on. It is neither good nor bad, but simply a result of technological progress. Like a sword, it can be double-edged.
Through his work, John witnessed firsthand how globalisation was used as a tool for empire-building rather than mutual prosperity.
The projects he was involved in prioritised the interests of multinational corporations over the well-being of local populations and their environments.
Put another way, the pursuit of profit and power can devastate countries and their people, nature, tradition, and pretty much everything.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
The Most Dangerous Superstition by Larken Rose slams the belief in authority, especially government, as the most dangerous lie in society.
He argues that this superstition leads to mass violence, oppression, and enslavement because people mindlessly follow orders from those in power, just like a cult.
He insists that individuals must take responsibility for their actions and stop bowing to government control. In other words, you canât vote your way to freedom and prosperity. Politicians, no matter what they say or how they act, are just actors on a stage.
"If you can convince the people to accept and rely on âauthority,â you donât need to force them." - Larken Rose
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
Planet Lockdown, by James Patrick, is a superb documentary about the worldâs current situation, featuring interviews with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors, lawyers, protesters, a statesman and a prince.
James started filming it early in the COVIDâą era, and it was the first of its kind that I saw. I remember watching it towards the end of 2020 and asking my wife if she thought the âpandemicâ was, in fact, real. Until then, I had thought it was real but neither deadly nor anything to worry about.
Planet Lockdown changed all of that.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
Micah Siegel is the youngest guest ever to appear on my podcast. As I type this, he is 12 years old.
Deciding that mainstream educationâboth private and publicâsucks, he chose a unique path for his learning: he left school because itâs a waste of time. Public schooling is mostly just state propaganda.
Excellent decision.
We adults can learn a lot from him.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
Harry Turner is a British war veteran who couldnât handle Afghanistan, so he packed his bags and went to the Amazon jungle to either die or find a new purpose in life.
Thankfully, he didnât die and instead found a new purpose in life: nature.
Wildcat is an Emmy-winning documentary that follows Harry's emotional and inspiring story of redemption. It's available onâwait for itâAmazon Prime.
âĄïž Please subscribe to my Substack and check out my official website.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
Anyone who has followed my work since 2020 knows about Denis Rancourt (read his Substack here) and our numerous conversations about COVID-19 and climate change.
But especially COVID-19.
Or rather, COVID-1984 (to borrow from Hrvoje MoriÄ).
I recommend listening to his conversation about all-cause mortality data across several countries, showing no evidence of a pandemic, and his conversation about vaccine-related deaths in the Southern Hemisphere. (Plot twist: the jab was neither safe nor effective.)
The following conversation, however, is the crĂšme de la crĂšme. Denis and his colleagues have published their most extensive paper to date, analysing all-cause mortality across 125 countries throughout the entire alleged COVID-19 pandemic.
We already know the conclusion (that there was no pandemic), but the scientific journey is the fascinating part.
The duration of the âpandemicââ2020 to 2023âis based on the declaration made by the WHO. (Speaking of the WHO, make sure to listen to my conversation with WHO insider Astrid Stuckelberger.)
The massive paper
The paper in question, Spatiotemporal variation of excess all-cause mortality in the world (125 countries) during the Covid period 2020-2023 regarding socio economic factors and public-health and medical interventions, is over 500 pages and has a really long title.
They analysed all-cause mortality data from 125 countries, covering about 35% of the global population.
What they found is an excess mortality rate of 0.392% during 2020-2022, compared to 0.97% during the 1918 Spanish Flu. (As an aside, I strongly recommend my podcast with Michael Bryant about the Spanish flu scam.)
India, not included in this study, had an excess death rate of 0.26% in 2021 alone.
The paper projected 30.9 million excess deaths globally from 2020-2022, with 16.9 million deaths related to the rollout to the jab.
Denis noted that the large variations in mortality rates were inconsistent with a viral outbreak. Clustering, which is not typical of viral behaviour, was apparently observed. Put another way, if a so-called virus spreads through a population, there shouldnât be pockets of sickâor deadâpeople.
Now what?
What was the cause of excess mortality, in that case?
* The jab: Repeated injections, including booster shots.
* Stress: Lockdowns and significant socio-economic changes.
* Medical interventions: Ventilators, certain drugs and denial of various treatments.
âWe conclude that nothing special would have occurred in terms of mortality had a pandemic not been declared and had the declaration not been acted upon.â
- Denis Rancourt
Talking points
Denis covered what was in the paper and touched on the geopolitical link between the COVIDâą era, wars, climate change and the sinking Western empire.
* Looking at the apparent spread of COVID-19
* Primary causes of excess mortality
* Challenging the notion of a pandemic
* Association between vaccines and excess mortality
* Excess deaths and the nonsense surrounding global warming
âThere was no pandemic. A virus does not wait for political announcement in order to decide to start killing people.â
- Denis Rancourt
âĄïž Producing high quality media isnât cheap. Please support my work by joining our private community. We have chat groups, live shows, resources, solutions, webinars, and more. Itâs USD 10 (monthly) or less with the annual option.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
I've avoided covering this idea for a while due to, I suppose, my own misunderstandings. Additionally, very few people know much about it and, those who do, have declined my podcast invitations, which didn't help.
But thereâs something profoundly intriguing about this topic, so I eventually found someone willing to demystify it for me.
Danny Carroll is a practitioner and author who didn't decline.
Read the full accompanying post here.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
It's not like he needs an introduction, but for the handful of people living under a rock, Alex Jones is an American show host and founder of InfoWars. He was born in Texas in 1974, dropped out of college and began his career in media as a public-access television host.
His rise to fame coincided with 9/11 and was one of the first people, in broadcasting, to suggest that it was an inside job. And he was correct.
Actually, he's been correct about a lot of things. đ€Ł
The Great Reset
The Great Reset is a breakdown of the 2030 agenda(Sustainable Development), primarily focusing on its goal to centralise global power and diminish personal freedoms.
His book exposes the globalist framework, led by technocrats like Klaus Schwab and Yuval Harari of the World Economic Forum (WEF), showing a huge disconnect between their Malthusian plans and, well, reality. He shows how itâs all aimed at restructuring world economies, political systems and societal norms under the guise of recovery from the fake pandemic.
The elites think their plans will bring global stability and progress, but the rest of us think itâs a bad idea.
Alex also unpacks the role of advanced technology, particularly mass surveillance and artificial intelligence.
He warns that technology, while obviously beneficial, is being twisted into a tool of compliance and manipulation, stripping away privacy and sovereignty.
Scott Adams made a similar observation in his conversation with me.
He talks about what he calls âthe digital gulagâ, where dissenting voices are silenced and individual freedoms are curtailed under the guise of security. Consider YouTubeâs obsession with removing videos and banning channels (like mine).
âIn the twenty-first century the price we pay for ignorance about ourselves will increase dramatically, because governments and corporations are now gaining unprecedented abilities to hack and manipulate human choice.â
- Alex Jones, The Great Reset (2022)
The Great Reset is an agenda to monitor and control the world through digital surveillance, digital IDs and social credit scores, replacing free enterprise with technocracy and centralisation of pretty much everything.
The Great Reject
Avoid it.
Donât be a victim.
There are ways to buffer against all this nonsense.
* Avoid mainstream media.
* Educate yourself on economics and get out of debt.
* Invest in real estate and hold assets like gold.
* While Iâm on the fence here, I kinda think that, in the short term, cryptocurrencies might provide a censorship-proof alternative to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
* Understand the agendas behind wars and donât take sides.
* Avoid major political parties.
* Stay healthy and fit.
âAs Iâve said before, the answer to any question for these globalists seems to be more globalism. Got a pandemic? How about managing it badly, then claiming you need global control to fix the problems you caused? Got climate change? Well, thatâs because we havenât given them enough power.â
- Alex Jones, The Great Reset (2022)
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
John McAfee was an entrepreneur and computer programmer best known for creating McAfee Antivirus software (which Iâve never used).
He joined me on my podcast a couple times.
âJohn McAfee was larger than life. Visionary, genius, and pioneering in software development, he forever changed the world of cybersecurity.â
- David Kaye, international cybersecurity expert
Quick bio
John was known for his outspoken views on politics and technology and was involved in several legal disputes. After creating McAfee Antivirus, he left the company in 1994 to explore ventures like smartphone security software.
He was a libertarian and ran for the Libertarian Partyâs presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020, and criticised government surveillance and the war on drugs. Speaking of which, he was arrested multiple times for drug-related charges and implicated in a murder in Belize.
In 2020, he was arrested in Spain for âtax evasionâ and was Epsteined in his prison cell in June 2021.
âMcAfeeâs contribution to computer security is undeniable. He was ahead of his time, creating solutions long before others realised the importance of protecting systems from viruses.â
- Larry Magid, tech journalist
Conversation
I donât believe that he killed himself and neither does his wife Janice.
She joined me for a very heartfelt conversation in which she chatted about:
* how they met
* how the government went after them
* the trumped up charges against him
* the botched hit attempt on his life
* poisoning of his dogs
* his arrest and death
* the Spanish authorities refusing to release his remains
âThe things we think we own, in reality, own us.â
- John McAfee
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
Dr Eugene Michael Jones (commonly known as E Michael Jones) was an Assistant Professor of American Literature at St. Maryâs College and is widely known for his critical views on contemporary cultural and religious issues.
I consider him one of the best in his category.
He was dismissed in 1981 due to his anti-abortion stance, leading him to leave academia and start a magazine, initially named Fidelity and later Culture Wars, which focuses on the disarray in the Catholic Church including the subversion of the Catholic faith. (As an aside, I recommend listening to my conversation with Frances Leader.)
Literature
The meaning of the term âholocaustâ has evolved over time, he argues, adding that various literary and propaganda influences including TV shows and films have shaped our understanding of history.
The word âholocaustâ hadnât really been used by anyone until around the 1970s, and as Jewish historian Norman Finkelstein pointed out to me, almost nothing had been written about it for the first 20 years.
It took about two decades to write a book about 'the Holocaust', but only three months to write about the sinking of the Titanic. I find that very strange.
Put another way, what âholocaustâ meant a few decades ago is not what it means now. Dr Jones explains what he means in his conversation with me.
He points out that some of the most influential WW2 figures like Eisenhower, Churchill and de Gaulle did not mention gas chambers or the genocide of Jews in their memoirs.
Hang on.
What?
Why?
Let's pause there.
Iâll type it again for emphasis.
Adolf Hitler was absolutely hated by the Allies, yet the three most significant Allied leadersâChurchill, de Gaulle and Eisenhowerâsaid absolutely nothing about either death camps or extermination of Jews in their extensive post-war biographies.
Why?
Wasnât that a lost opportunity to completely bury the FĂŒhrer?
To make matters more interesting, the Red Cross found no evidence of gas chambers in Germany. More specifically, itâs a three-volume investigation called the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, published in Geneva, 1948.
Itâs a lot of reading but itâs freely available at archive.org. You can find a summary here.
âThere is insufficient evidence to justify the statement regarding execution in gas chambers.â
- Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1943, Vol. I, pp. 416â417
Conversation
He (rightly) suggests that there is extreme suppression and censorship of discourse, allowing pretty much only Jews to openly discuss this particular historical event.
Why are people jailed for asking questions about a world war? As of 2019, around 19 countries criminalise anybody questioning the Holocaust.
If something is true, why does it require state protection (with force)?
It is a criminal offence to question or âdenyâ the Holocaust in the following countries:
* Austria
* Belgium
* The Czech Republic
* Canada
* France
* Germany
* Greece
* Hungary
* Italy
* Israel
* Liechtenstein
* Latvia
* Lithuania
* Luxembourg
* Poland
* Portugal
* Romania
* Russia
* Slovakia
* Switzerland
Why?
Iâll repeat myself: if something is true, why does it require state protection?
As Norman Finkelstein (who lost family members in the camps) told me, the Holcoaust is an industry.
An industry built on stories that have changed over time?
âEisenhowerâs Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchillâs The Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulleâs three-volume MĂ©moires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this vast body of writing, which totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory sections), published between 1948 and 1959, there is no mention of Nazi âgas chambers,â a âgenocideâ of the Jews, or âsix millionâ Jewish victims of the war.â
- Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus, University of Ulster, 5 Dec 2005
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
â ïžJohn joined me for two short conversations between 2020 and 2021. For simplicity, I merged them into a single video.
He was scheduled for a third appearance on my podcast, before heâlike Liam Neesonâwas âtakenâ.
Background and death
He was involved in a bunch of legal disputes (probably because he was over the target) and was known for his politically incorrect views on, well, everything.
After creating the hugely successful McAfee Antivirus software, he left the company in 1994 to explore other ventures, like smartphone security software.
John was a libertarian and ran for the Libertarian Party's presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020 and was a critic of government surveillance and the war on drugs.
He was arrested multiple times, including for drug-related charges and was also implicated in a murder investigation in Belize where he had been living, following which he was arrested in Spain in 2020 on charges of 'tax evasion'.
John was found dead in his prison cell in June 2021, in what was ruled as a suicide (surprise surprise).
His wife doesn't believe he committed suicide.
Neither do I.
I suspect he was Epsteined.
Janice (his wife) joined me for a very heartfelt retrosepctive conversation, to which I recommend listening.
From having his own drug lab in a jungle in Central America, to marrying a prostitute whom he met on the Mexican border, to being accused of murder, to running for American president, John was indeed a colourful character.
âPut this Jerm motherfucker on repeat!â
- John McAfee
A bit more
There's a lot about him online, so I won't repeat it here. Instead, I'll recommend the following documentary because it's so damn good.
He was neither left-wing nor right-wing, but he was definitely the middle finger. Resisting the establishment and buffering against its attempts to control and surveil our lives is something for which we should always strive.
However, it's a minefield and, unfortunately, John stepped on a mine.
âThe only real security that a man can have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â
- John McAfee
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
The below photo, taken by Keith, is a survivor and soldier of the Forces for the Democratic Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) standing guard during âpeace negotiationsâ with the United Nations (UN) in the eastern Congo.
To be clear, a lot of Rwandans were murdered during âthe 100 daysâ of April 1994. Probably hundreds of thousands more than the official account.
Thatâs not where the myth(s) are found.
Quick background
The myth(s) are a multilayered consequence of US-backed propaganda and international confusion resulting from deliberately skewed reporting.
Put another way, the mainstream narrative is that the Hutu-led government orchestrated an ethnically-driven genocide of Tutsis (with a few moderate Hutus thrown in for good measure). We are told that around one million âcockroachâ Tutsis were murdered by the Hutus after the aircraft carrying President JuvĂ©nal Habyarimana was shot down on 6 April.
Except that, well, itâs nonsense, and Hotel Rwanda is a propaganda piece.
For example, Hutusânot Tutsisâmade up the majority of those slaughtered.
What actually happened was a multipronged, violent coup dâĂ©tat backed by various international interests including Uganda and the United States. A genocide was one limb of the entire body. A Western-backed civil war was another limb.
Paul Kagame, coincidentally, has been the president ever since.
Keithâs photos
Keith Harmon Snow, a former lecturer at the University of California, is an award-winning photojournalist and war correspondent.
Here are some of his harrowingâbut beautifulâphotos from his time in Central Africa.
He has spent a considerable amount of time in various African countriesâincluding Rwanda and Ugandaâand has a profoundly deeper knowledge of Rwandaâs history, politics, and culture.
Conversation
â ïž At around 36 minutes, he says that the Inyenzi launched a series of attacks against the Juvenal Habyarimana Hutu-majority government in the 1960s. This is an error. He meant to say the GrĂ©goire Kayibanda Hutu-majority government.
âThe mediaâs the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and thatâs power. Because they control the minds of the masses.â
- Malcolm X
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
Jason Christoff runs an international self-sabotage coaching school that teaches students about mind control, brainwashing, behaviour modification, and psychological manipulation.
He argues that key players, using manipulative psychology, are responsible for the current social decline we see around us and that we can overcome all of it through acquiring beneficial knowledge and improved health.
In other words, stop being a blame-shifting loser and, instead, start taking responsibility for your choices and decisions.
Why?
Because, he argues, you will become a better version of yourself.
âWe are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.â
- Aristotle
Talking points
* Self-sabotage makes one's life worse and difficult to change.
* The ruling class uses mind control to keep people in a state of self-sabotage.
* Facing pain and failure is necessary for personal growth.
* Repetitive consumption of media is harmful.
* Transhumanism and the manipulation of gender roles destroy masculinity and feminity.
* Taking control of one's physical health is crucial.
* We must build the 'five pillars of strength'.
âDonât let the fear of losing be greater than the excitement of winning.â
- Robert Kiyosaki
âĄïž Support my work by joining our underground network. We have chat groups, webinars, Q&As, live shows, and more. Iâll also give you a personally signed cartoon print of your choice.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
Stuart Fischbein (Dr Stu) runs a website and podcast called Birthing Instincts.
More specifically, he is an OBGYN (Obstetrician-Gynaecologist) with over 40 years of experience who specialises in breech and twin births and supports VBAC (Vaginal Birth After Caesarean).
In other words, he has delivered a lot of babies in both hospitals and homes, promoting the latter due to it being safer and healthier.
âWhen you end up meddling with birth, you end up needing technology.â
- Dr Stu
Personal thoughts
Had my wife not been pregnant at the time, I wouldnât have considered this talking point. On a road trip, she found Dr Stuâs podcast and we listened to a few episodes.
We kept nodding at what he said and I realised I needed to get him on my podcast.
It turns out that, paradoxically, this topic is rarely discussed while being the most important moment in life. Literally.
How weâre born shapes our entire life.
Think about it.
Good birth conditions, for example, mean better health and growth, physically and mentally. Bad conditions can lead to lifelong issues.
I dare you to subscribe to my SubstackâŠ
Itâs all about fear
We have been taught to believe that hospital births are safer than home births. Theyâre not. Weâve also been taught to believe that itâs all about âgetting the baby outâ when itâs a helluva lot more.
Read this paper called âHome Birthâ with an Obstetrician: A Series of 135 Out of Hospital Births for a study of the dangers of both home births and hospital births.
If youâre too lazy to read it, the conclusion is that home births are no more dangerous than hospital births. In fact, due to the high number of medical interventions, hospital births can sometimes be more dangerous because of the increased risks.
As Dr Stu notes, the establishment has, over the last century or so, duped men and women into believing that childbirth is a medical condition needing clinical intervention. Hospitals are for treating patients when something is wrong. Is there something wrong with childbirth?
No.
Childbirth is not a medical condition.
Why rush to the hosiptal, then?
Only in the rare case of a genuine emergency. (The definition of âemergencyâ has broadened so much that almost everything is now labelled as one.) A little over a century ago, the majority of births took place at home. Today, almost all happen in hospitals.
What changed?
I strongly recommend watching the documentary The Business of Being Born. It came out in the early 2000s, but it's more relevant than ever.
The point is, there is a lot of missing information, probably by design. My guess is that our decision-making might look different if we were more knowledgeable.
âThe whole medical system is not designed for wellness. It's designed for pathology.â
- Dr Stu
Conversation
Very importantly, Dr Stu adds that medicine absolutely has its place but that we should challenge the over-medicalisation of childbirth.
He covers a few talking points, including:
* Men discussing pregnancy and birth
* Decline in academic standards
* His journey to home births
* The etsablishment's opposition to home births
* Too many interventions and C-sections
* Long-term effects of medical interventions
âThe medical system is geared to get these women to get on the assembly line of getting delivered.â
- Dr Stu
âĄïž Support my work by joining our underground network. We have chat groups, webinars, Q&As, live shows, and more. Iâll even give you a personally signed cartoon print of your choice.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
I have had a number of conversations about what happened on 9/11. After all, other than COVIDâą, itâs one of the biggest events in my lifetime.
Actually, I would argue that the COVID era was the biggest event in world history, although 9/11 is certainly a close contender.
That being said, the official 9/11 story is very obviously nonense.
âIn a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.â
- George Orwell
What actually happened?
To be clear, the towers did collapse and there was an explosion at the Pentagon. Put another way, there was a tragic event and a lot of people died.
Itâs the specifics that matter, however. For example, what caused the towers to collapse and did an aircraft crash into the Pentagon?
And more alarmingly, did two Boeing 767s fly into the Twin Towers?
Yes, thatâs a real question. And no, jet fuel doesnât collapse buildings, especially if there were, you know, no jets.
Have you ever slowed down the official footage or looked at stills?
It looks ridiculous, like something youâd see in a cartoon.
Mark Conlonâs work
Mark is one of the few people Iâve come across who has deeply investigated the narrative surrounding the Twin Towers and, more specifically, he argues that neither of the two Boeing 767s crashed into the towers.
I strongly recommend going through his website.
âHe who controls the media controls the minds of the public.â
- Noam Chomsky
Understandably, nobody wants to ask questions for fear of being labelled a clown. I mean, we all saw the planes fly into the Twin Towers.
Or did we?
Thankfully, Mark not only asks questions and attempts to answer them.
âI have seen nothing that has convinced me that the official narrative is correct. In fact, I have seen a great deal that suggests it is not.â
- Richard Gage, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
âĄïž Support my work by joining our underground army fighting the good fight. We have chat groups, webinars, Q&As, live shows, and more. Iâll even give you a personally signed cartoon print of your choice.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe -
Laura Aboli chats to me about transhumanism, what it is, why it's a terrible idea, and what we can do push back against it. Everything is not doom and gloom.
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe
This is a public episode. If youâd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.jermwarfare.social/subscribe - Mostra di più
